/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53031776
>B-B-B-B-B-B-BBBUT
>UR A BULGARIAN TRANNY
>NOW SEETHE WHILE I LOSE 25% IN TWO WEEKS

Considering the absolute media blackout of LINK, I’m inclined to disagree. If you were correct they’d be marketing to normies way more to fleece them out of their money as well. I ultimately believe they would prefer a few autists making it over a lot of normies.

I'll give you a couple of answers I've filtered over the years to be true, from the few times I've gotten a fudder in a rare moment of clarity:

1) Turbo autists who figured out the need for externally connected smart contracts very quickly, and who now seethe at the entire world for failing to understand it like they do. Chainlink is sort of like a metaphor for their general inability to integrate with society, where they are rational and right and it's the world's fault it's so irrational and dumb..
These people fud because in their mind the world should have figured out LINK in 2019 at the absolute latest, but failed to, and so they'll seethe and rage at everyone and everything as a way to express this frustration.

2) People who had LINK stacks but lost them swinging, or gambling, or in a CeFi collapse, or who simply got fudded out of LINK back in 2018 and have been furious ever since. They will never buy LINK because they can't buy it at $0.30 like they had the chance to back then, and then basically rage at people continuing to hold because "if I can't make it then neither can you"

3) People who try to profit off taking an oppositional position to LINK. Usually grifters like the CLCG/Honeycomb/API3 guys, or NEXO, who are charlatan fraudsters and basically parasitic animals to Chainlink just like there are many fraudster teams that are parasitic animals to ETH. They fud because muddying the waters about Chainlink lets them shill themselves, it doesn't go much deeper than that.

4) The seriously mentally ill, like Michael, who also fits in category 2) but has now made a large part of his online identity "being a link fudder" and can't really distance themselves from that because it's the only way they can consistently get attention online, which they crave.

>>53031776
Yep.
Chainlink is nothing but a smoke and mirror partnership scam at this point, no different from VeChain.

Basically they claim to be partners with XXX to feign legitimacy, but in reality they have no partners, no actual business revenue from their software services, and their primary business is in fact dumping millions of premined air tokens onto the spot markets.

>>53031833
>no reference
>Former Google CEO and Swift Strategy Director at Smartcon
Pick one

>>53031776
Full disclosure I hold LINK but i agree there’s something “curious” about how heavily it’s been shilled to /biz/ in particular. In addition, Eric Schmidt’s entire focus after retiring from the corporate world has been to find innovative ways to raise money for Democrat party politicians. I find myself wondering if that’s purely a coincidence to his involvement in Chainlink

>>53031868
What about SBF? He was there too. And Machinsky the year before? All they are missing now is heckin Elon

>>53031938
I refuted the pic he posted. In regards to the scams that clung to Link, something I posted earlier was: all you had to do was buy Link, self custody and then wait. But patience is something a lot of poors lack. Which is why they were separated from their funds.

>>53031957
how much chainlink to buy?

>>53031961
How did you reply to that almost instantly? Bot?
Buy as much as you’re comfortable with, I’m not going to tell someone how they should use their money.

>>53031776
gigantic psyop is the best way to put it. is there anywhere else on the internet where you have two opposing factions posting threads every single hour? 24/7 you have the shills, paid shills and fudders and paid fudders stinking up the board with their useless drivel. similar to what you're doing. let me be frank, you can post as much as you want, maybe some people will sell maybe some people will pick up on the psy op and buy more, i can also make that same argument for the opposite argument. you can shill as much as you want, some people might think its a psyop and start selling, you might even get a couple of believers. i can similarly make the same argument for myself, am i fudding or am i shilling right now? its been close to 6 years now and what does chainlink have to show for it? nothing but a staking pool that has capped out at less than 10% of the total supply. and here is the kicker, you can't even withdraw, nor can you claim your reward. so what is the fucking point? i guess it goes to show that you can have all of the information in the world, but that won't help you if you're getting yelled at from all sides. will you trust a fatman who has an unproved record and only has 1 major release in ~6 years? or anonymous faggots spouting shit from their fingertips? unless of course you staked lol, you're kinda shit out of luck, can't withdraw or claim rewards indefinitely, but to also counterpoint that, those stakers are currently only securing one data feed, meaning that currently 2.5% of the total supply is securing the eth/usd price feed and that number could climb to 7.5%. but what about the other price feeds? what if those start requiring staking? what if ccip needs staking(its a consensus mechanism, so it absolutely does)? long story short, i already staked so im stuck bro go bother someone else.

>>53031776
>Yorke Rhodes III attends smartcon
>has nothing to say

>>53031776
This guy gets it. I've literally never seen a single linkfag outside of /biz/, even on twitter

>>53032008
Sergey Nazarov was a well-respected figure in the world of cryptocurrency, known for his work as the head of a major project called Chainlink. But despite his many accomplishments, Sergey struggled with feelings of discomfort and unease in his own body. After much contemplation and soul-searching, Sergey decided to transition and become a woman. It was a difficult and emotional decision, but Sergey knew that it was the right thing for her.

As she began her transition, Sergey faced many challenges and encountered a lot of negativity from those who were not supportive of her decision. Some in the crypto community were resistant to the idea of a trans developer, and Sergey faced a lot of backlash and criticism. Despite these challenges, Sergey remained determined to succeed in her chosen field. She worked hard to prove herself and show that she was just as capable as any other developer, and her efforts paid off.

Over time, Sergey's talent and dedication won over her critics, and she became the first female trans developer in the crypto space. Her story inspired many others to be true to themselves and to follow their dreams, and she became a role model for trans individuals everywhere.

>>53031957
>clung

Come on man, Sergey promoted them. Thats a big difference

>>53031833
This is exactly it, the diaramas and diagrams on their website changed so much from early on, it used to be institutional focused and now it's shitcoin focused. What changed?

>>53031868
Here are the facts:

NO Google partnership
NO Swift partnership
NO Gartner, NO IC3, NO Docusign etc. etc. ad nauseum.

You fuckers were had. These partnership scams pumped the price to $50. You could have sold.

Chainlink is literally the new VeChain: promoting partnership scams to its idiot bagholders while dumping on them relentlessly.

>BUT, BUT SOME HOMELESS MAN THAT LOOKED LIKE ELON MUSK STUMBLED INTO ONE OF SERGEY'S 3-HOUR LECTURES ABOUT NOTHING, TESLA PARTNERSHIP CONFIRMED!

I have more fucking respect for XRP niggers than you LINKcels at this point.

Go on yahoo comments and/or investorhub for any highly discussed stock and theres 24/7 fudding/shilling. There is not a world conspiracy suppressing the 25th shitcoin.

>>53032111
They used Link for publicity and seemed legit at first. A lot of anons got out at the first signs of corruption and warned everyone else to get out. I remember smug anons saying they would not because of their “heckin rewards”. I’ll level with you and say it’s ridiculous the Chainlink team never made a statement about it but at the end of the day every single person who used those platforms knew the risk and accepted it.
>>53032119
SWIFT is going to use CCIP for international CBDC’s. These high level players were salivating at the thought of Sergey helping them achieve cross chain interoperability on the tokenization of real world assets. Just watch: https://youtu.be/NWxfeQA3lI4
I know your goal is to sway newfags from buying because you have to know I’m never selling at this point. So hopefully they do some DD and watch this. Your plan failed buddy ol’ pal.

>>53031797
I disagree BECAUSE it's /biz/. When this all started, the people here were way ahead and way smarter than norms, tards and jeets. There were ETH winners, BTC winners, and people becoming wealthy from Ans, Litecoin, and other bullshit. What will slow them down before they become the new elite? Perfect, make up a stupid useless token that makes it look like they found THE crypto to own. Guess what happened? Smart anons bought LINK instead of the shitcoins and garbage, and guess which one went up a ton? If these crumbs were remotely true, LINK would've been the biggest gainer. Instead, it's a small gain and the bull run and crypto had the door shut

>>53032229
>SWIFT is going to use CCIP for international CBDC’s.
They are not.

>These high level players were salivating at the thought of Sergey helping them achieve cross chain interoperability on the tokenization of real world assets.
Nice little fanfiction.

>Just watch: https://youtu.be/NWxfeQA3lI4 [Embed]
No. Some academic talk is not evidence for legally binding financial/technological partnerships. Post some evidence for claimed partnerships instead. Oh that's right, THERE IS NONE.

>I know your goal is to sway newfags from buying
I don't care if more idiots get burned. I held 15,000 LINK from 2017-2020 and I'm graciously informing any remaining bagholders that this is nothing but smoke and mirrors, no different from VeChain eternal bagholders now.

Furthermore, in light of the coming regulation, LINK is 100% an illegal security operating offshore just like FTX, and selling illegal air tokens to Americans and Europeans, which just like FTX, is 100% illegal almost everywhere in the world.
2023 is the year of shitcoin genocide.

>>53032314
You again eh?
>I held 15,000 Link and perfectly bought the bottom and sold the top.
Sure you did buddy thats why youre fudding in a Link thread in 2023. We’re done here.

The Company had private investors before they launched the ICO.

It was an open ICO, without any kind of OTC VC deal. It came out at the end of the ICO boom too, and at a period where crypto VCs were relatively small fishes compared to now. The few crypto VCs were instead backing complete dogshit that died in 2018.

Despite the immense backing of swift, WEF endorsement etc. the team was surprisingly lacking in public VC connections. The major part of the 2018 era biz enthusiasm was due to how surreal it all felt. If you did basic due diligence and put various pieces together, it was blatant how huge and legit critical it was, yet no one was talking about it outside of biz, and it lingered in the rank 150 for a couple of years.

The few VCs that were in the ICO exited very early. You have to remember what it was like between 2017 bull and 2018 bear. Blockchain had no utility, no applications yet. Just white papers.

The irony of course is that actual developments in the smart contracts space mostly occurred thanks to chainlink itself. But VCs then didn't see it or cared.

The only VC that bet big on it was Framework. A small new fund with no other connections, just a couple of rich dudes with FANG experience and daddy's money. They missed out on 2017 and the early ICOs but they saw it like biz saw it, and they went big on it, and the early projects that adopted it like synthetix.

That was the birth of defi. The first real utility in smart contracts, and how crypto recovered from bear to bull again, which allowed new L1s narratives, yield farms etc. There would have been no bnb or ftx success without defi.

Framework significantly derisked over the years but still remain close to those early defi players to some degree. They since tried flipping and betting on shit like NFT gaming garbage, probably losing already. They're just like the other VCs retards now, it's about connections instead of actual flair.

Other VCs don't want to touch link.

>>53032273
Your timescales are much too small. The dog coins pumping was completely inorganic and most likely to try and get people to fomo into garbage. Link has always been a multi year play.

>>53031776
no they aren't. not with some of us around. and we're around and here. don't worry, we'll always be ready for you ding dongs getting psyopped.

you're our little fuckers anyway. even the little fuckers from reddit who want to just try this site. we'll be here ready to provide what you need and what you need to know. it's our duty.

>>53031797
if they did that normies would eventually start reeeing and the whole operation would be blown wide open

>>53032434
Even if the pump was caused by VC's and FTX, it doesn't matter. Notice all the "this is a LINK board" posts. Again, think about who is saying that. They're trying to catch /biz/ up in a trap that doesn't go up, making money is the only thing that matters in crypto and LINK buyers didn't make anything for the last 2 years

>>53032467
Are you the one posting crumbs that lead to nowhere for almost 6 years now? I haven't even brought up

>Eric Schmidt appearing at a conference and then slipping back into the shadows
>Inviting SBF to your premier conference two months before he blows up the entire industry
>How Celsius was going to change the landscape of finance with Chainlink's help
>Buying Cornell tech with millions of $ and hyping it
>The Facebook "slides" on Sergey's laptop
>Libra being included in LINK diagrams
>Announcing a bunch of 2022 products and releasing a half baked version of one product
>The Gemini proof of reserves hype
>Putting companies like Fidelity, SWIFT, DTCC, Oracle, Microsoft in the conference headliners just to announce nothing

It's been non-stop psyops since this project made its way to /biz/

>>53032074
> never seen a single linkfag outside of /biz/, even on twitter
Kek this has to be bait. Twitter Link community is thriving. Fudders like you hate it because you get blocked as soon as you start with the obvious fud
>inb4 that makes it an echo chamber
No, it makes it well balanced and informative. /biz-style fud in there barely exists as everyone just filters it out. It's far superior for sensible discussion, though i still like biz for its silliness

>>53031888
Trips of truth
Also find it wierd how biz, a board full of white supremacists and neo Nazis thinks that these progressives would just hand them the golden goose.

>>53033889
This is exactly why it's 100% a psyop. Handing a bunch of anons tens of millions of $ to go against special (((interests))) and become elites with unlimited financial resources? Not a fucking chance. That /biz/ can't figure out why, 6 years into this, they're not getting traction with this project is the surest sign. Ask yourself, if SWIFT was real, why isn't LINK market cap 5? Why was Sergey never going on CNBC or Bloomberg? Why did LINK never get attention during the DeFi bullrun despite the billions it supposedly enabled?

Op is on the money. What was the reason for the crumbs? I was 25 when I bought link, I’m now over 30 and all those crumbs failed to change my life

>youre not meant to have this
>this is the future of the 4th industrial revolution and lynchpin of the new financial system
>all the elites and insiders know about this
>$5 (-90%)
Lol yeah naaaah

>>53034173
Anons are starting to get it. Imagine believing something /biz/ "wasn't meant to have" would be $5 after all these years. Imagine that VC's would let /biz/ buy for pennies instead of piling in and pricing them out. Imagine thinking billionaires like Eric Schmidt and Mark Cuban wouldn't horde all of the tokens if this was what the crumbs suggested it was

>What is a Psyop for $1000

>>53033889
>just hand them the golden goose.
Link is the most fudded token on this board and always has been. This thread is just another example. YOU are fudding it right now. We missed a fucking bullrun. JUST HANDED? It's been 5 years and I'm not rich yet. This has been stressful as fuck. They even try and scam us by shilling Aave and whatever else so you need to take a haircut or lose all your stack.

You're such fucking liars. I'm never selling. Fuck you, pay me.

>>53034674
You sound like me years ago. Eventually you’ll start to understand it’s never going back up

>>53034783
Literally bottom signal

>>53033889
>>53034075
lol stupid bots this isnt pol
not to see we truly belief different things, but msot here have no desire to save the world like pol does
before nubiz most threads ended up on the conclusion that biz preferred endresult is fucking off to some isolated place and never having to interact with normies/clownworld ever again
after the coof this sentiment has only grown so much stronger

we here arent a thread to any government

>>53031776
Nobody would even bother performing a psyop against biz because biz doesn't fricken matter. People here are so fricken paranoid. All the alts are down big. Link isn't doing anything special.

>>53032331
So no argument, huh?

Fucking shitcoiners ALL get the rope in 2023.

OP is uncle aka u/anstothemoon on Reddit. I'm guessing he didn't get invited to family xmas this year and has all this free time.
Say hi to that tranny Eric wall.

>>53034896
Pure seethe kek

>>53034839
>not to see we truly belief different things
>but msot here
>we arent a thread

holy shit is this a bot or a jeet? kys

>>53034860
All of the crumbs and focus on making this a LINK board disagree with that sentiment. Many anons with 50k stacks have been in crypto longer than moonbois and are somehow poorer. I wonder why they were targeted

>>53035019
That last sentence may be the most Jewish shit I've ever read. I bet you twirled your side burns with glee after typing out that low blow strawman demoralisation tripe.

>>53031776
The people who bought in 2017/2018 were not separated from their money. If it was a psyop, it was a shitty one that saved me from roping in 2018-2019.

>>53032434
The dogcoins were CZ arbitraging OKEX and Huobi washtrading to milk roundeyes on Kraken. He used the proceeds to finance a meteoric rise in BNB's market cap. You could watch it play out in trade volumes each time.

LINK has always been a multiyear play and lost the last run to "fundraising" done by HQ. It might well lose the next one too if they aren't able to profit off of network fees and air drops. If they are though, we've had our ducks in a line going on half a decade now.

>>53034075
Why didn't ETH flip BTC? Why did the BNB walled garden DeFi LARP give proper DeFi a run for its money? It's all people shitting in their hands and throwing it at the wall. Horoscopes and toddlers. Speculation until it isn't. And even then look at mining stocks running close to the industrial value of what they're pulling out of the ground. It doesn't have to make sense because it's dumb shit speculators and AIs trading mass hysteria.

If you think it's logical you're further away from understanding it than the average LINK FUDDer who's just doing it as a cope for something they get but hate with every fiber of their being.

Also your point about giving a bunch of people 10s of millions is some dumb fucking shit. Millions of people got millions off of real estate pretty recently to create asset valuations for use in collateral. LINK is nothing by comparison.

these threads make me more bullish. I dont know why. Its some sort of conditioning. im going to spend more of my wagie on some stinkers.

>>53034674
Ha, well said anon. Of course, Now that we're entirely staked there's nothing they can do about it.
I felt palpable relief when I staked my entire stack, It's out of your hands then. Fortune will deal with it. We just sit and watch the stack grow wekk by week.
You are staked, right?

>>53035438
>I'm going to dump my entire $400 pay check into this failing shitcoin that's soon to be regulated out of existence!

That'll show them.

>>53035547
Wow feels so comfy and relaxing making $3 per day that I cant even sell am I right fellow stake marines

>>53035598
>$3
Kek you stackleteers just need to keep stacking, You'll get there!

>>53035598
he is obviously talking about the future pricing of said receive asset
dont be too dumb

>>53035438
You sound delusional man

>>53031776
>>53032112
>>53032273
>>53033679
>>53033818
>>53034075
>>53034615
>>53035019
>"chainlink discussions are a PSYOP," says the faggot who spams the board 24/7 along with the same 5-6 esl posters backing him up while filling the catalog with other fud threads about a token that they deem is unimportant
yawn
how many other threads have you made in the last few hours?
were you one of the ones stuck posting here on Christmas?
i have 14k staked, how does that make you feel?
if i made a thread about it would you spam it with 20 angry replies about blue cube bad while also claiming that you don't care?

>>53031776
didn't read a single word of your post. LEGENDARY cope

Ever since I started fudding Chainlink I felt my soul slowly leave my body. I'm like a person who is no longer sapient, nothing more than a collection of meat and preprogrammed directives. I'm no longer capable of making decisions, it's strange.. and it's like it comes from somewhere else. For example: the shills say something and I just FUD, I no longer think what's "right" or "wrong". Interestingly, I don't even believe in right or wrong anymore only worse and more worse.

It's like what happened to Phineas Gage. Possibly part of my prefrontal cortex has been irreparably damaged from FUD. My entire personality has changed since fudding Link and becoming a Fudlord. I am no longer the same person, my hopes, dreams, and wishes have all vanished. Now I only care about destroying Chainlink and financially exterminating the marines.

I have nobody to blame but myself, although I'm no longer capable of blame as I can no longer think for myself. And the worst part? I actually like it.

>>53035574
5ptbid
>>53035696
3ptbid

Keep going. Please. My resolve only becomes stronger.

>>53036172
Based anon. I’ll buy a few link tonight too.

>>53036172
yes truly at this point nobody here is selling and there arent any newfags left
so i do wonder why they still bother at it

>>53031776

Delusional Fudders. LINK is going to lead the bear market again, just like last time.

>>53036172
your resolve wont be so strong, when this thing hit $1. 2017 fags bought at .$0.15 - 1, your pain point is below $1, and you know bear love tormenting you.

>>53031776
never selling never steaking

I have 60k Link staked. I'm never unstaking any of it, ever. I know i've made it, and now I just sit back and do nothing, just watch it grow 2800 Link over the next year, at which point i'll consider selling a few of those rewards.
I don't mind telling you all, it feels extra-good to be in this position, and telling you all about it. I can anticipate the squirming rage of all those fudders who tried, to no avail, to persuade me against this.
It's too late and I'm there. I've crossed the finishing line and there's nothing any of you can do about it. How about that? Now kiss my big white arse.

>>53037572
>2800 Link over the next year, at which point i'll consider selling a few of those rewards
well to be fair you still arent sure you can do anything at this stage
locking rewards was a pretty retarded choice, but outside of that little detail yes 60k staked is making it

>>53037620
>you still arent sure you can do anything at this stage
What do you mean? I want them staked. That was always the plan. See, there's this notion fudders are trying to peddle that we don't want our tokens staked for any length of time. It's nonsense. I'd happily commit to a 10 year lockup. The other wonderful think is that I never bought any Linkpool, and have no need to be concerned about third party providers now anyway. If anyone can look after my tokens, it's CL. I have nothing to worry about. Feels good man.

>>53031776

It literally went from $0.09 at ICO to $53. Many bought at $0.30 to $0.50. 100x is solid as fuck considering most don't even do that much. You can see analytics. Not that many people made money from Shib. A few select people made a lot. However, a lot of people did get life changing gains from LINK just not "Fuck You" life changing.

>>53031797
They are telling us what they are doing. The elites have too. They can also release the information and then try and to hide it. Its their belief system. Either through apathy or ignorance if you don't understand they believe the onus is on you and not them.

CBDCs are going online soon. Testing phases around the world are underway. This is how they wear people out emotionally. Demoralization tactics through building you up emotionally for a release and then delaying it or creating long periods of waiting times so you second guess yourself. Hiring paid actors to encourage selling at low price points through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

I do think that staking was kind of a trap and many will miss on an ideal selling point over the next 12 months though.

>>53037700
i was talking about the rewards, still no real clarity there
everybody wants access to the rewards

>>53037961
> ideal selling point over the next 12 months
Nice bit of fud there. Ok so what price are you selling at?

>>53037961
>This is how they wear people out emotionally
o this worked wonders, completely drained emotionally, the euphoria of last year so close to making it (my own number) i could taste it then this year its been rough to see it snatch away so violently
but what they didnt count on was that this would only harden my not selling stance
anyways 12 months seems a bit early, 24 maybe

>>53037979
I'm not FUDing. I just didn't stake because 12 months is a long time and I'd go bat shit if we pumped to $150 or something which is where I'd take some profits. Many were staking everything they had and it didn't make sense. Sure if you have 35,000 LINK then stake 7,000 and have 80% left over to work with. 5% isn't worth it and its unclear if you get the BUILD tokens but that would be the real reason to stake anything at all.

>>53038029

Maybe, but crypto moves so fast I think we could be surprised. Honestly, its good to be paranoid in this regard and have options imo.

So many scams that initially felt safe has robbed so many people of their holdings especially with LINK. Bancor, LPL, Celsius etc

>>53036506
Now this is what I call cope 3

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays everyone. Hope you've got some New Years resolutions lined up.

>>53038173
Is this the digital dollar pilot? Or the conclusions from swift poc in October?

>>53038332
SWIFT poc in October.
Full doc:
>https://files.catbox.moe/9lenly.pdf

I've never seen any real discussion of link outside of /biz/. Every time I've seen it elsewhere, it was just reactions to a pump or a dump. And among the crypto-havers I know IRL, none of them have any chainlink or think about chainlink at all. Y'all got played.

>>53038503
How many crypto people outside of /biz/ crowdsource a corporate email to get access to an industry publication from SWIFT in order to go through it sentence by sentence and compare it to historical documents in order to see how the language and framing is developing?
There's a reason we are a decade ahead of everyone else.

>>53038173
MAJOR league cope, did you read the OP? Everything I've laid out is just one long string of bullshit, you're continuing it. You are part of the psyop. In 5 years you'll post new "crumbs" from the Bank of Japan and berkshire hathaway and expect us to believe they're secretly using Chainlink

This psyop is incredible and persistent. To anyone on the fence about what I've posted, look at this thread for proof that this is one giant psyop. Oracle, JPMorgan Onyx/Christine Moy, Digital Asset + Blythe Masters, Microsoft/Yorke, Wolpert/Baseline, every single day some "crumb" is thrown to this group of ducks called /biz/ and they eat it up everytime

>>53038566
>Everything I've laid out is just one long string of bullshit
Most honest fudder

>>53038582
lol got em

love the concern troll FUD

>>53038582
run along now anon, I think you have to prepare for tomorrow's crumb psyop. Is it going to be the Bank of Singapore this time? What about the DTCC? BNY Mellon? I know you have an arsenal of obscure pdf's ready to go but we are exposing you in real time

>>53038609
One thing you never find in these pdfs is any mention of chaninlink whatsoever.

>everything is about /biz/
Some of you guys are delusional.

>>53038633
checked. I wonder why Chainlink is not explicitly mentioned? Could it be that these developments are happening without Chainlink and the psyops are using them to garner more support? Ask yourself, if any of these institutions were using LINK, wouldn't it be hard to prevent insiders from buying up a bunch of tokens, and start an ETH run ($1->4 digits after EEA announcement)

Chainlink joined the EEA, btw, and it went down hard. ETH is the real insider coin, LINK was the psyop to stop you from buying ETH

>>53038503
Most bullish thing i have read on this board in 3 years

>>53038690
>Could it be that these developments are happening without Chainlink and the psyops are using them to garner more support? Ask yourself, if any of these institutions were using LINK, wouldn't it be hard to prevent insiders from buying up a bunch of tokens, and start an ETH run
You have literally destroyed chainlink's relevance with that one sentence. Bravo. No doubt some angry shill posts will follow yours soon enough.

>>53031776
Newfags won't know how factual and correct this is because it looks like copypasta fud.
Where is docusign? Where is Gonser? Just disappeared in a cloud of farts.
Literally none of the "breadcrumbs" have ever materialised. None of them. Any of the few big wins Chainlink have actually had, like their close relationship with Aave, have almost surprised this board completely and were never predicted or leaked.

>>53038609
The gymnastics you guys have to pull to make it seem like Chainlink is some obscure and pointless nothing token are amazing. Do you ever feel bad for lying or is it just second nature at this point?

>>53038730
The burden of proof is on you to prove that chainlink isn't a nothing token.

>>53038690
AVAX is the actual true insider coin, Ethereum was killed to make room for it.

t. bought LINK at 17 cents and found some of the most legendary chainlink breadcrumbs back in the day

>>53038730
do u feel bad for scamming newfags? The token is literally fucking useless

>>53038748
>AVAX is the actual true insider coin
You mean ICP? That coin will kill LINK and AVAX both.

>>53038750
The token is not only useless but not needed.

>>53038760
>You mean ICP?
nope
>That coin will kill LINK and AVAX both.
no it wont, ICP is just a scam to steal money from retards so they dont buy LINK and AVAX. kinda like XRP and Cardano and other scams. they even tried to fool us with ROSE.
most newfags of course never figure any of this out and thats why they dont make it.

>>53038789
I can tell you definitely won't make it by dismissing ICP. I can't be bothered to spoonfeed newfags though, just enjoy being poor.

I hope you're all having a great holiday season.

>>53038796
>just enjoy being poor.
already made it. you on the other hand, nope. ngmi.

>>53038746
The burden isn't on me to do anything. I don't care if newfags, you, or anyone else buys Chainlink. I don't see why you insist on lying about it, though, that's all. I don't go into XRP threads and lie about their token.
>>53038750
I've never scammed anyone. Chainlink is a fantastic purchase, though, but I don't care if newfags buy it. It's really not a big deal.

Why do fudders always know so much about Link and its development? They know all about the crumbs, connections and everything about Link. Yet they always claim to never have owned this "unneeded scammy erc20 shitcoin" or that they bought at ATL and sold at ATH, and of course they never provide a single screenshot of their sell order.

And they keep making tons of threads everyday about some token they don't care about. Staying for hours to reply to everyone else. 90% of Link threads here are created by these fudders, yet they claim it's because "Chainlink Labs Ambassadors shitting up their board for half a decade"

>>53038842
They're mentally ill, I think. I hope dude poster is okay and gets the help he needs.

>>53038730
>gymnastics
>n-no you

Anon I'm not the one that has scammed newfags for years posting obscure, sketchy pdf's on a Japanese egg frying board

>>53038842
I don't invest in precious metals or own any palladium but I still spend a couple of hours a day on obscure precious metals forums, researching everything I possibly can about palladium as an investment, just in order to tell the people buying palladium that they're idiots, and telling other people to stay away.
It's perfectly normal to obsessively fixate on an obscure asset that you don't own, anon, and dedicate hours a a day to talking about it and obsessing over it. Everyone does it.

>>53038842
all that is why I dont take fudders serious. the whole argueing for hours over a coin they dont hold is my big tell. all that does is scream I HAVE THE TOKEN AND AM TRYING TO GET YOU TO SELL CUZ I KNOW MORE ABOUT THE COIN THAN THE DEVS ALMOST AND HVAE ALL THIS OLD INFO AND YET I DONT HOLD THE COIN! yeah thats not sus AF.

>>53038885
>Anon I'm not the one that has scammed newfags for years
Neither am I.

>>53032008
>is there anywhere else on the internet where you have two opposing factions posting threads every single hour?
Here's a thread on a bodybuilding forum that's been going since 2006 (16 years straight) where two main guys plus their supporters are arguing back and forth who is the best bodybuilder, Dorian Yates or Ronnie Coleman.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=69359.0

It has 44,053 Replies 2,801,828 Views and 1763 pages.
They haven't come to a conclusion yet. Hope this helps.

>>53038885
I got scammed into making money. That's crazy man

>>53039075
he resembles a plate of general tso's chicken. therefore he wins

>>53039112
Yes, the black man is superior.

>>53035547

>>53039269
Is this really another Michael account?

>>53039269
That's another one of michaels account lmao

>>53039269
oh top fuck

micheal is literally a Canadian? Judging by his posts he gives some awful advice and seems to get off on the russian/ukraine war with no life

>>53039081
>making money
>$50 to $5 in a year

>>53039402
My link tokens cost .30c a piece. I think I will.be okay holding this investment.

>>53037927
Lowest link went, other than that cz scam dump, was $0.11. If you bought at 0.30 or 0.50, $50 was the only exit point rivaling the gains made in meme coins.

>>53040956
>>53040956

That is false. ICO allowed for $0.09 not $0.11. They gave extra to people during ICO which dropped it below $0.11

all true anons a fat russian has been scamming me for years and this is the first year I didnt profit wtf?

>>53031776
Spot on, I've been saying this for years, it's an obvious psy op to make midwits lose money

>>53041650
yea from $50 to 5
>b-but i got it under 30c
ill see u there soon.

>>53031776
Thanks for the warning I sold.

>>53034075
I just made a new rule for myself. I'm going to count how many link fud posts I read in a given day, only ones, that appear paid for, and I will buy 1 LINK per post.
I don't make a ton of money, but I'm around $100k after taxes and before bonus.
Im looking forward to this method of accumulation

>>53043096
no life loser kek

There's no reason why any enterprise would trust a shady Russian company with their "decentralised oracles"

updated version

>>53043420
kek, based

>>53043420
Kek

>>53038051
>stake 20%
I staked the best part of 60k Link and only kept back 1500 Link for selling (if we moon) over the next 9-12 months. Keeping out 80% is really short sighted. Selling 80% of your stack at $150 is short sighted. I was always playing the long game, though. I think you may regret your decision, but good luck.

>>53032395
Thanks for the informative post anon.

>>53044190
Second that.

>>53034615
>>53034173
You're both fucking brainlets and here's why: normies don't care about the underlying technology of link or why it's so important when it comes to enabling all these different smartcontract usecases. Literally all they see is 'number go up' and then they fomo in. If number doesn't go up then it may as well not exist in the normie's eyes. Normies don't live on the internet all day like biz neets nor do they have the time to research chainlink or smartcontracts or defi, so it's very unlikely they will even hear about link until it moons 1000x. Not to mention that normies only buy what everyone else around them is buying or what their retarded charismatic celebrity figures tell them to, and link is about as far from mainstream as you can get. So the price only being $6 is the PERFECT way to ensure they don't get in and find out about it.

Also: smart money has much longer time preferences considering most of them are already wealthy. They aren't regular anons like you and me worrying about their rent or credit card bills. They don't need it to moon in months. They're playing the long game to shake out those who are impatient/need liquidity.

>>53031888
>Eric Schmidt’s entire focus after retiring from the corporate world has been to find innovative ways to raise money for Democrat party politicians. I find myself wondering if that’s purely a coincidence to his involvement in Chainlink
Holy fuck
Also SBF being at Smartcon and the dancers putting their balls in our face...
I unironically don't feel so good...

>>53032229
>SWIFT is going to use CCIP for international CBDC’s. These high level players were salivating at the thought of Sergey helping them achieve cross chain interoperability on the tokenization of real world assets.
That doesn't make sense in the context of centralized systems desu

>>53044470
>That doesn't make sense in the context of centralized systems desu
Yes, anon. This new Swift system is about to change that context. Haven't you been following developments? CBDCs need interoperability. You need to read up on this.

>>53031776
>crumbs
Dont do this to yourselves. Dont turn into XRP or GME schizos.

>>53044592
while CBDCs are inevitable right now, it means more need for privacy solutions in defi

>>53038874
>anyone who doesnt join a cult that loses all of their money needs professional help

Good lord dude. Do you hear yourself

>>53032273
Nobody gives a shit if a few Bizlets hold Link you absolute mongoloid, you think they started one of if not the biggest project in crypto just to take some breadcrumbs off the table of a few autists?
Give your head a wobble.

>>53044432
How about the way they pretended to hire dozens of HR roasties when they don’t even have a physical office building anywhere? Were they even real people??

>>53047641
>bulgarians and powerful unknown entities are conspiring to suppress and fud us sisters1!
>no one fucking cares about /biz/ you mongoloid rolf
the duality of the LINK bagholder

>>53038842
I never understood why people say this like it's a gotcha. It reveals how out of touch you are.

Do you have any idea how many salty, burned holders there are here who took too many tabs of hopium and hate themselves for it? No one who sold would be full of that kind of venom. They are wrestling with the truth that they need a 10x to make it back to ATHs, and nothing is guaranteed, and if it is going to happen they know it will be years. I marvel at how people still insist this isn't the obvious cause of the majority of this persisten fud. LINK can shake it all off with real price action but it hasn't done that since 2020.

>>53044085
Not really, I'll be able to still open longs with my cash position and hopefully by that time I can open options on LINK. There is one choice right now, Premia and it kind of sucks imo.

If a better options service opens I'll probably sell less than 80% and buy puts. Everything moves in cycles there is no reason to not take some profits after exponential gains instead of watching it trickle all the way back down. I'd probably buy back in a lot if I make a successful swing. If not oh well

>>53048373
the longer sergay ignores the token price, the more people will join the ranks. The die hard fan will eventually flip

>>53044394
Yeah I'm really worried about laymen making the toke price go up too fast. Good thing it isnt still $50 they might notice and buy up the whole supply!