/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53012268
BTC is -69% from ath. You really think Link can hold $5.30 if Bitcoin sees -80% from ath, like in 2018? 2023 looks bleak as hell, without CCIP in Q1, Link will see no news. I don't expect any peeps about ccip until the digital dollar pilot concludes in March. We break or bust on what if anypositivr news comes out from CCIP based on the conclusion of this pilot.

>>53012558
I shouldn't have to make these posts, there should be anons shouting about it but I guess that's where current sentiment is. I don't even see a reasonable chatter about it on Twitter.

Many of the digital dollar pilot participants are publicly associated with chainlink in one way or another. CCIP will connect 11k banks to all properly equipped blockchains. Everest ID initiative is a key component of this system on the user side.

Merry Christmas to anyone living under a rock. This is the most relevant hopium link holders have to cling to.

>>53012656
>Everest ID initiative is a key component of this system on the user side.
lmao, the utter delusion

yes bro, all these financial institutions will buy that low volume low liquidity dead Uniswap shitcoin with the worst price chart in all of crypto and then use that barely working Everest wallet on the Everest chain on the Everest platform to scan your Everest identity to send this Everest stablecoin while using Everest ID coins to another Everest wallet, the future of finance bro

>>53013074
Kek

>>53013074
Non-duplicable on chain identity is necessary for KYC'ing with something like CCIP enabled SWIFT integration. That doesn't mean it would be the -only- ID mechanism available. But I'm sure you already knew that, considering you are clearly posting in good faith.

>>53013134
of course that proving identity is and will be important, but thinking that a big institution will pick a dead project where they have to buy 250K of some dying uniswap shartcoin and then stake it in order to be able to execute such operations is just straight up retarded

>>53013228
Oh yeah, like how institutions have to pay gas for user transactions? It will all be seamless and interoperable with many solutions for different needs. Incredible you are choosing to be this way on Christmas. Have some self respect, anon.

>>53013272
>like how institutions have to pay gas for user transactions
what a dumb non analogy, this isn't gas it's that retard Bob picking some arbitrary number of dead low liquidity Uniswap shartcoins which you have to lock up just in order to have full access to all features

and why 250K? why didn't Bob make it 500K? 750K? might as well put it at 10 million, then the epic institutions will finally buy all your bags am i rite lmao

>>53013074
It's over for this globohomo shitcoin.

>>53013272
will link fail? will it ever get to tripple digits?

>>53013317
I can tell you struggle to sleep at night knowing that CCIP and SWIFT are working closely together.

>>53013612
why would I struggle with that? that's good news to me

>>53012656
thanks for the hopium I was about to sell please dump on my face more sergey

>>53013621
Yet you're kvetching over DiD. It is all a holistic interoperable system. Sounds like you're burned up anon. Merry Christmas.

>>53013632
>It is all a holistic interoperable system
Everest could stop existing this very day and it would change absolutely nothing for the Chainlink and SWIFT cooperation

4M marketcap and 30K daily volume, not even the janitor of SWIFT gives a fuck about Everest let alone anyone of any actual importance

>>53013672
If you aren't keen on any and all ID solutions going into the next few years, you're just a retard. You should make a thread to war other people with your well thought out genuine concern for their financial well being.

>>53013692
so link and id are good bets for the next adoption phase of the tech?

So what your saying is this 5 means I’ll be a billionaire?

>>53012268
The fact that you idiots don't know how to read esoteric signs tells me Link is the midwit trap.

>>53013672
If it turns out you're wrong will you come back and eat humble pie and admit your Scrooge-like behaviour on Xmas day was not only uncalled for but completely misplaced?

>>53013692
>If you aren't keen on any and all ID solutions
I am. something like DECO alone is worth a shit ton. and before you start screeching yes I know that DECO and Everest are not the same le deduplicated identity I know

I also know that whichever solution wins won't require you to buy and stake 250K of a dead shartcoin in order to have access to its features

>>53013782
You're the only person nitpicking and screeching.

>>53013761
look Everest doesn't even have to be "the" solution at the end, potentially it could moon just on pure speculation of being said solution, but the reality is that there are absolutely 0 (zero) signs of any accumulation of anyone with any size at all, in fact it's only dying even more and more

do you know how little 4M marketcap is? dumb jeet projects have 5x that with no capital. a single mid sized whale could pump this alone in one day. yet you genuinely think SWIFT and Citibank and MasterCard and BNY Mellon are all preparing to buy a shitload of Everest to stake it and use Everest features with 30K daily trading bot volume. it's beyond delusional

>>53013796
>nitpicking
lmao basic facts are nitpicking eh

if someone wants to use Everest full features he has to lock and stake 250K Everest ID. Everest ID has 4.3M marketcap and 31K daily trading volume. all facts.

>>53012268
>According to TA

>>53012268
it's dead

>>53013831
The Link price action is pretty piss-poor but you seem ok with that. Why not Everest?

>>53013853
You're unhinged

>>53013898
imagine trying to legitimize your shitcoin by associating with chainlink of all things
nobody is buying your shitcoin man, let it go

>>53013890
notice that I haven't mentioned Everest price once, but its marketcap and daily trading volume.

for LINK even back in 2018 when it was in the 20-50 cent range there was a clear sign of accumulation, it wasn't at 20-30K daily volume for a year straight and magically went to hundreds of millions one day, things don't work like that. and now besides LINK huge marketcap and daily trading volume you also have clear on-chain analytics of big players only accumulating even more LINK at these price, basically all signs which Everest doesn't have.
in fact with Everest it's only further distributing even at these prices not being accumulated. not really a sign of big tradfi giants looking to get in

>>53013898
>You're unhinged
>>53013879
>it's dead
>>53013864
>>According to TA

>>53013991
>t. olgfag.LINK is done. We got our money and forgot about it.Happy memories. Good luck bagholders.

>>53013929
Okay, fair enough. I wish you'd said that earlier instead of the rather aggressive tone you took. It's much more convincing when you're polite and explain your position

>>53013919
This is a little a link thread with a reference to one ID project that I don't own. You guys are fucking retards merry Christmas

>>53014044
>>53014015
When will you retards realise that LINK is a thing that HAPEENED here not a thing that is HAPPENING. Its done. Before that there was ETH and the bigbrains have left this prajeet and vatnik scam spam sewer long ago and won't post about what's next here because LINK would have gone 10x higher if it was not for /biz/ faggotry and the board is full of repulsive plebbit gme and dogcoin buyers

>>53014333
It is done. You can sit and hodl it for five more years or realise that now. That does not mean LINK or sergay are done but your chances of making it from buying link and hodl are gone. You loose. Thanks for playing.

>>53012558
Considering weve been holding steady since bitcoin was at 30k, I think the BTC dumps are getting less and less effective. I don’t think they anticipated die hard autists to be accumulating much more.

>>53013074
/thread

>>53013919
Everest is interesting but it’s more risky than Link and Link is still risky.

>bancor
>linkpool
>now everest
just buy link for fucks sake you people are peak midwit.

>christmas day
>link shill thread
>all the paid jeets posting never said merry christmas
>not even a happy chanukah
>btw we are going up
really makes you think.

>>53012656
based everchad
anons are blind. they will see too late.
>>53013672
you are retard, that's ok

>>53013782
>FYI Chainlink’s zkKYC proposal is academically interesting, but will not work in the real world. Everest’s zkKYC actually is accepted by financial institutions (DECO’s is not), and we may actually be able to “power” their solution.

>>53016188
This is the sauce that proves /biz/ put the cart before the horse with link. Not a single enterprise used link in 2022 for operations

>>53017210
We invested in the iPhone before the invention of electricity

Fuck Everest and fuck the investors for funding them. I hope they fail miserably

>>53017210
Yeah you are wrong.

https://market.link/overview?searchView=true&searchSection=DATA_PROVIDERS

>Associated Press
>Accuweather
>CipherTrace
>TwelveData

https://market.link/overview?searchView=true&searchSection=NODES

Node operators
>DeutscheTelecomSystems
>Binance smart chain (BSC)
>Accuweather
>AssociatedPress
>TwelveData
>CipherTrace

and hundreds more

https://market.link/overview?searchView=true&searchSection=NODES

>>53017256

>>53013929
Good contributions throughout the thread thank you, anon. Can you cook us up some LINK hopium? What are your expectations for the next 2 years?

>>53012268
what happened to the christmas build airdrops

>>53013692
suggest some coins for id managment beside everest, it seems like the new hype train

>>53019071
everest is not "id management"
everest is identity

>>53013559
it's barely even begun.

>>53019244
so can you give a honest price prediction if they achieve everything

>>53020157
no

If Bitcoin dumps to $12.5k where will Link stand? Let's calculate.

According to TA, we are about to have a 30 % pump on Link which will take us to: $7.67

Bitcoin will dump down to $12.5 from $16.5

That is a 25 % dump.

Alts might get hit harder and dump 25 %

That would mean Link will remain at around $5.75

>>53012268
I'm sorry, but I am unable to predict the future price movements of Bitcoin or any other asset. It's important to remember that the value of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies can be highly volatile, and that investing in cryptocurrency carries a high level of risk. It's always a good idea to carefully consider your investment decisions and to consult with a financial advisor before making any investments. It's also important to be aware of the potential for scams and to be cautious when dealing with any financial products or services.

>>53013782
This a provisionbal patent application. Any anon with $110 dollars can file one of these for any batshit crazy idea that they have.
This means absolutlely nothing.

>>53022428
*provisional patent application

>>53017289
Running infrastructure so Sergey can print you tokens does not equal them using link.

I just bought 2.1 Linkies!

>>53022428
Wtf, DECO isn't real? Ari lied to us? They've all been pretending to work from home? Whoa fuck!

>>53012268
Yeah. because he was so good at making decisions, he ended up staring at a bench for 2,000 years in the same underwear. So fucking wise.

>>53013612
No one cares about CCIP. And it wont be a price catalyst just like staking wasnt. Link will go up in price if BTC does. Thats the only catalyst, just like every other shitcoin.

>>53023022
Hahahahahahahaha haha HAHHAHAHHAAHHAHA

>>53013743
yes