/biz/ - Business & Finance

Are you from the based department?

>>52991351
Enjoy your measly 50,000 in the future. Now stfu.

>traded REAL physically tangible united states dollars for FAKE numbers on a screen

>>52991351
>AMA
how does $1000 sound?

>>52991351
How does $200 sound?

if you really need 'decentralized' (none are) oracles
band > link
but both are shit in the end
and smart contracts are useless anyway
t. depressed and fuck you

>>52991351
Hey congrats anon
Thats the best investment there is

>>52991548
I just need price feeds for an options platform I work for bro and last I heard BAND token isn't introducing low latency oracle solutions for derivatives anytime soon.

>>52991409
chainlink provides even more fake numbers on a screen for people like me - buying picks and shovels here my g

>>52991700
you're buying worthless shitcoins my g

>>52991711
but with conviction!

>>52991772
congrats, what's the point of this thread? you want a pat on the back for being retarded with conviction?

>>52991789
just documenting my journey for my bizbuddies, why are you a hater tho fr

>>52991821
why is your journey worthy to be documented? so far it looks pointless and dumb

>>52991829
you literally don't have to read it. the real ones get it and if you don't it's cool too

this comment section is wild fr

>OP larping as a zoomer faggot shillink link
kys

There will be only bitcoin (bsv), there is ABSOLUTELY zero need for your useless erc-shittoken, sorry

>>52991891
>random reply guy is larping as a hater

closest ID to 'sergey' wins 10 LINK!

>>52991915
BSV? you mean BSC - binance chain?
could be, CZ is the goat and will save the bullrun

>>52991351
>>52991687
>>52991700
>>52991772
>>52991821
>>52991837
>>52991857
>>52991936
>>52991957
This is a demon.
Dysgenic freaks who succumb to shilling and hyper-hopium addictions become demons.
They always think they are winning no matter what happens.
As long as they're being stimulated according to the pattern that allows them to receive their circle jerk rewards nothing else matters to them.
There is no incentive for them to logically analyze anything, least of all themselves.
They can always just retreat back into their autism and receive the greatest false hopium they know and all else can be forgotten.
Shilling on demand accompanied by fake hopium, the most common forms of hyperstimulus, have deleted the souls of the majority of the link bagholders.
Chainlink is the jew's greatest weapon and its casualties are piling up and choking out real humanity.
We have to kill them all.

>>52991971
okay guy, relax. what's your
>logical analysis
of why LINK doesn't go to 1k?

Let's hear it

>>52991351
I have heard that CitiBank theorized that a utility token such as the Chainlink token (Ticker:LINK) could possibly exceed the market cap of Bitcoin in time assuming the continued adoption of DLTs.

>>52991351
Well done my G. 2023 is looking lit af for Link fr fr no cap

>>52991915
With the inevitable introduction of CBDCs, how will this one global chain interoperate with them?

>>52992047
>few

this is some alpha right here

>>52992065
on god fr - 23 is the year we stop playin

>>52992004
It's over bro, our Chainlink journey ends here. The Great Reset timeline has come at a crossroad with humanity. The magic is gone, the memes are stale, the shills have been uncovered, the agendas laid bare for all to see.
I-i-it's over marine...only tears from here.

>>52992092
>this is some alpha right here
how new are you? we've known about that for years now.

BRRAAAAP

>>52992127
get it together marine

>>52992171
some us of have lives and don't need to follow every little bit of 'news' because they have conviction from day 1 ;P

>>52992295
that new piece was spammed 24/7 when it was fresh, then it was brought up all the time sense then, for you to have missed it you most be quit new. also ignore everyone fuding link they are paid actors or fud for fun bagholders trying to psyup you into selling

>>52991700
I would never take advice from someone who says, "my g".

>>52992295
Have you planned what you're going to do with your multiple millions down the line. If you've even staked 1k LINK in v0.1 you're kingmade. 6k LINK would make you an unstoppable God.

>>52992072

>>52992072
2/3

>>52991409
>traded fake digital numbers on a screen backed by men with guns for fake digital numbers on a screen backed by autism
Really, you're betting on which force you think is more powerful.

>>52992072
3/3 Nchain have patented eveything anyone will ever need in the blockchain space, no one can do anything without nchain's patents. chainlink is a security too

>>52992890
The problem is that you think anon is aware of how fake his money really is.
Let him think that his crinkly cotton sheets are in any way more powerful than a bunch of code.

>>52992907
why are you posting pics of a mentally ill grifter who's main job is getting rekt in court?

>>52992907
>getting rekt
okay, he's satoshi no matter what you think

>>52991351
in ten years you will own a castle

>>52993012
bro cmon, he got called a schizo and got 1£ compensation to finally shut up in that case.. genuinely worried for you if you think CSW is anything than an eternally salty charlatan

>>52993333
check em craig

I'll give you a couple of answers I've filtered over the years to be true, from the few times I've gotten a fudder in a rare moment of clarity:

1) Turbo autists who figured out the need for externally connected smart contracts very quickly, and who now seethe at the entire world for failing to understand it like they do. Chainlink is sort of like a metaphor for their general inability to integrate with society, where they are rational and right and it's the world's fault it's so irrational and dumb..
These people fud because in their mind the world should have figured out LINK in 2019 at the absolute latest, but failed to, and so they'll seethe and rage at everyone and everything as a way to express this frustration.

2) People who had LINK stacks but lost them swinging, or gambling, or in a CeFi collapse, or who simply got fudded out of LINK back in 2018 and have been furious ever since. They will never buy LINK because they can't buy it at $0.30 like they had the chance to back then, and then basically rage at people continuing to hold because "if I can't make it then neither can you"

3) People who try to profit off taking an oppositional position to LINK. Usually grifters like the CLCG/Honeycomb/API3 guys, or NEXO, who are charlatan fraudsters and basically parasitic animals to Chainlink just like there are many fraudster teams that are parasitic animals to ETH. They fud because muddying the waters about Chainlink lets them shill themselves, it doesn't go much deeper than that.

4) The seriously mentally ill, like Michael, who also fits in category 2) but has now made a large part of his online identity "being a link fudder" and can't really distance themselves from that because it's the only way they can consistently get attention online, which they crave.

>>52993355
I'm a linkmarine but I have to say that Uncleoldfag is extremely based. One of the few people to make money on this board.

>>52991351
the last time i bought chainlink it was 42 cents

>>52991936
ROLLAN

>>52993333
It's gonna blow your mind that he is and always was satoshi

>>52991936
Roll

>>52993959
satoshi doesn't talk like a faggot and can prove access to his wallets though.

checkmate craig

>>52994383
wtf i thought this craig wright thing had been put to bed after those farcical court hearings? Jesus doesn't this guy know when to quit? Mind you i't his faggot boyfriend that's paying for it all, isn't it? Talk about sunk cost fallacy, holy fuck. Sunk dick fallacy as well

Why would you buy crypto when everything's about to come crumbling down? Especially when it's an unregistered security like chainlink

>>52991656
Kek. No. LINK has partners that perform way better, like ALBT. But you retarded linkies are too blind to see

With this dump to $6 I finally increased my stack to 5000 Chainlink tokens after buying 4000 at 50 cents

I will, at the very least, half make it

>>52992949
It's not the cotton sheets; it's the zog-bot army backing them.

>>52993355
I'm a 1) but understand the stupidity of the world now and have made peace with it. I no longer fud. I just zen it and sit here chilling for the inevitable which will come whenever the universe realizes the world is ready for it.

>>52994383
He has proven it to many people by key, but key is not identity, that's the whole point.

>>52991936
checkit

>>52991936
Stand back boys, I got this.

>>52995421
sdwcWDmk is Sergey in Polish

>>52991351
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Ethereum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>52995446
Back when fud was actually clever. Back when things like “cyber-techno machinations company” were obvious winks to the reader, things like “APIs, partnerships” were obvious jokes to anyone but the newest, most credulous midwits.
Compare that to the retarded, repetitive, low vibrational frequency seething of the last two years.

>>52995229
now you're just making stuff up. craig wright has never proven ownership of any keys related to satoshi wallets

>>52993333
Quads BTFO these retarded idiots

>>52995580
>low vibrational frequency seething of the last two years
*bulgarian spellcasters laughing in the shadows*

>>52996319
Gavin andresen, jon matis, calvin ayre

>>52991351
based

>>52994952
Who would win, 1 million niggers or a smart contract?

>>52991401
he's the CEO.

>>52997605
cohorts. why should anyone believe those guys?go back to your containment thread

based chainlinkgod thank you king

>>52997834
Nice cope

>>52991936
Yeaaaaah gimme dat

>>52991936
I am sir gay

>>52991936
Rolling.

>>52998057
nice namefag worshipping. you guys are desperate. your chain sucks.

>>52997605
that's not how this works you absolute retard. if he did prove ownership, everyone could verify is via the magic of a public ledger. how would it even work to prove it to just 3 people?

I'm actually angry about how retarded you are

>>52994993
this is the most based post in the entire thread
aside of course from OP acquiring a sui stack

>>52991936
Gib

>>52991936
rolllllllll

>>52991915
This message does prove SN believes in Moore's Law and that the current blocksize is a literal sabotage attempt by core.

>>52991351
He's already half a billionaire, Sergey is in no rush to deliver anything. It seems like he's hiring people aimlessly because he doesn't want to do the hard work anymore, only give talks and presentations to feel important. That explains the HR army (he doesn't want to face the consequences / do the work that a badly led workforce entails) and the delays (devs don't know how to actually solve the problems he declared solved on power point slides). The whole operation is just his ego trip now.

>>52991936
Mine.

>>52991936
Roll

>>52991936
Rollgay

>>52991936

ZURGEJ

>>52991936
Easy W

>>52991936
ROLL

>>52991936
BUMPERINO

>>52993366
t. Michael

I can't believe that in 1 year I'm going to have 350 more link than I had before, without doing anything. And this will continue, and the number will only grow, as long as I live.

>>53004133
Comfy

Sorry

>>53005305
bsv is bitcoin and you're gonna have stiff