/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52876769
nobody give a shit, go back

Yes, i noticed.

>>52876769
chainlink is dead. TNN

dead shitcoin

>>52876769
Yes

wish all these retarded nerd companies would stop hiring women as their marketers. WOMEN DONT KNOW SHIT ABOUT ANYTHING, FUCK THEM OFF COMPLETELY

>coin loses 90% of value
>lets get back to basics
>posts an overly complicated slide full of text no normie could read or understand
Theyre still shit at this

>>52876769
What I read is that the 20 HR roasties and 100 people they hired to shill Chainlink to legacy businesses have been a complete industrial disaster.
In 2 years they brought T-mobile, AP, Accuweather and... That's it. Probably 50-70 millions down the drain for 3 nodes.

I honestly feel mindbroken by this. Also this twitter post is dogshit.

>>52877005
>In 2 years they brought T-mobile, AP, Accuweather and... That's it.
They've been running nodes for months or even years; that's more legacy adoption than any crypto in existence ever got, including ETH.
And that's without even mentioning Swift.

>>52876769
they delayed ccip again, they are just trying to look active in other areas

>>52876785
Fpbp

>>52876769
Oof marines this is bad, they are very desperate, unsteak and redeem now!

>>52876947

I didnt say it was effective, just that it has potential. There has clearly been a change.
They just now need to dumb it down into bite sized pieces with normie retard friendly comprisons

>>52877048
Listen nigga. Most of this board holds some of this shit. Just deliver a product and stop fucking around with our funds. Get rid of Jonny and distance yourself from his cartel. Stop shilling here, it's a waste of our money and your time AND GET TO WORK!

>>52877218
>Just deliver a product
You mean like the absolute top oracle network?

>>52877048
70 millions for 3 nodes is pathetic. And I'm being nive considering Sergey dumped more than 140 millions tokens at a $20 average.
Probably cost him 150 millions to pay most of those useless parasites.

>>52877225
Half the top 20 dumped a lot more of their token supply than Sergey, but none of them can come even close to Chainlink's legacy adoption.

>>52877222
How much does Sergey pay you to not develop but browse /biz/ instead?

>>52877247
>oh noes, an irrefutable fact...
>quick, call him a paid shill!

>>52877237
>artificially inflated VC scam pump and dumps
vs
>just keep on dumping onto any buying pressure

anyone shilling chainlink without criticism is a paid shill. that includes stakers.

>>52877270
>anyone shilling chainlink without criticism
You said they haven't delivered a product yet.
That's just stupid, half of crypto runs on Chainlink.

>>just keep on dumping onto any buying pressure
Solana for instance dumped like 30x more token supply than Sergey.

>>52877225

If you think 70mm is a lot of money you have no right to share your opinion

this is dead, they got fools to stake and now they will dump while fools can't unstake. it will remain like this until they can unstake and then they will sell it being under $2

>>52877290
>>52877290
>You said they haven't delivered a product yet.
don't you fucking pilpul me, i never said that.
>Solana
>>52877270
already adressed, FTX probably used it to wash trade user funds thst vanished.

Sergey just dumps on the market for "funding" and doesn't discuss price for legal reasons playing the "Smart Con"

>>52877369
>i never said that

This you: >>52877218
>Just deliver a product
?

>Solana
>already adressed
Hell no.
Solana dumped like 30x more token supply on their holders than Sergey did; no amount of twisting and squirming will ever change that.

>>52877369

what is with you pol incels?
you hate niggers yet you cant stop talking about nigger cocks all day, and nigger sex.
You hate Chainlink, and you cannot stop talking about it all day every day either

>>52876785
>go back to the Chainlink board
And here we are

>>52877381
again with the pilpul? Filtered.
>>52877382
Oh no, did the niggerword trigger you? Does it annoy you Rory that I'm fucking with your scam? How much does the jannie cost you? Just some freely printed linkies I'd wager is enough.

>>52877322
Go take 70 millions km of CLL cock in your anus you smug clueless faggot.

OG BTC WHALES ARW LITERALLY PAYING DOOR DASHERS TO FUD THIS TOKEN NOT NEEDED ON CNBC LMAOOOOOO

>>52877432
>gets caught red-handed pilpulling
>accuses others of pilpulling
Classic

>>52877150
this
carrot dangling intensifies

>>52877495
Switched IP's I see. Ok, for anyone reading this thread afterwards before I filter you too.
Chainlink announced staking in 2019 and has now (more than 3 years) delivered some bullshit contract where you give Chainlink Labs control over your already paid for LINK in exchange for 4.75% more LINK. As a reminder this reward comes from the (freely) preminted supply of LINK that the team owns and has never hit the market. In the mean time the team now dumps about 50 million LINK per year on bagholders while delaying supposed product releases time and time again and it can be assumed that it's all vapourware.

As for Solana: Solana was created and pumped by FTX and most definetly used by FTX to launder the money they stole from users. End of argument.

>>52876769
This OP is ChainlinkGod testing the waters after this tweet. He's not gonna get away with it

>>52877573
No this OP is the guy that has been spamming threads about Chainlink marketing ever since Adelyn was demoted. Probably also the same guy that larped as the oldfag wallstreet guy who just stumbled on /biz/ and wanted to buy into Chainlink, as well as the anon last week who got called by a sales zoomer hired by Chainlink and was appalled at the lack of expertise. All very believable and organic.

>>52877561
>filtering people
fucking faggot lmao

>>52877561
>Chainlink announced staking in 2019
They actually announced it in the 2017 white paper, and gave a deadline earlier this year, and they delivered.

>As for Solana: Solana was created and pumped by FTX and most definetly used by FTX to launder the money they stole from users.
Solana dumped like 30x the token supply on its holders compared to Sergey, being tied to FTX changes nothing.
Also, what about the dozens of other cryptos that dumped more tokens than Sergey yet pumped harder than Chainlink? Uniswap, Fantom, Matic, etc. etc. etc.

>>52877639
I'm actually too lazy to do that kek

>>52877660
FTX dumped the Solana shitcoin on itself, do you know how money laundering works? Of course all the gullible retards also bought in after it pumped.
This is exactly what I mean, pilpul by acting retarded as if you don't understand this. Now FUCK OFF!

>>52877695
Now do the other dozens of coins that dumped more tokens but pumped in price anyway.

>>52877723
No, that was your argument you lazy fuck. Not my problem you brought up THE most obvious scam mr. pilpul

>>52877743
>No, that was your argument
My argument was "half the top 20" dumped a lot more tokens than Sergey, yet still pumped, see >>52877237

Solana is just one of them.

>>52877766
Yes and Alameda Research pumped a shitload of shitcoins with FTX money. >>52876770
It's all wash trading and Sam is going to prison for it while Sergey makes less money but plays the "Smart Con" while shoving it in your face and can probably walk away a billionaire scott free. He probably has more cash on hand than the richest man on earth.

>>52877799
So every coin that dumped more tokens than Sergey got pumped by FTX?

>>52877882
>>52877882
Well I don't know the inner workings of Alameda but yeah, to some extent is my conclusion. It's not like other CEX don't do this, they're just not as greedy and deluded like the tweakers at FTX/Alameda.

>>52877935
So why was Link uniquely not pumped by FTX?

>>52877946
Because there is this one sided giant sell pressure by Sergey anytime the volume (buying pressure) rises.

>>52877976
>FTX does not pump Link because Sergey dumps tokens
>but FTX does pump coins that dump a lot more tokens than Sergey

That makes negative sense.

CHAINSHIT IS THE ONLY CONFIRMED SCAM IN CRYPTO THAT NEVER PUMPS LMAO THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF JEWS REFUSING TO TRANSFER THEIR WEALTH

>>52878001
Bro trying to reason with a fudder is like trying to 69 an octopus. Even if you figure it out, nobody wins.

>>52876769
WHY DOES IT NEED A TOKEN

>>52878128
Don't have the screenshot handy, but Vitalik Buterin argues that oracle networks need a novel token to protect against Sybil attacks.

>>52878128
>>52878149
see pic
It's extremely basic human incentivization, and it only works when the price effects are restricted as much as possible to the proprietary ecosystem (i.e. with a proprietary token).

>>52878100
>like trying to 69 an octopus. Even if you figure it out, nobody wins.
Such a boomer joke, but I still keked.

>>52878001
>>52877976
That supposed LINK holder supposedly don't know what wash trading is is very fucking bearish. Now obviously you are shills but anyhow.
>wash trade is a form of market manipulation in which an investor simultaneously sells and buys the same financial instruments to create misleading, artificial activity in the marketplace. First, an investor will place a sell order, then place a buy order to buy from themselves, or vice versa. This may be done for a number of reasons

>To artificially increase trading volume, giving the impression that the instrument is more in-demand than it actually is.
>To generate commission fees to brokers in order to compensate them for something that cannot be openly paid for. This was done by some of the participants in the Libor scandal.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wash_trade

>>52878186
I know what wash trading is. We're talking about token dumps.

FTX supposedly does not pump Link because Sergey inflates the circulating supply.
But according to you FTX does pump tokens that inflate their supply a lot more.
That makes the opposite of sense.

Eric Schmidt scammed me into holding his bags

>>52876769
>If only they could now distance themselves from Chaintwinkgod
Never gonna happen. They recently posted his article on their official blog. Including his fucking nazi frog avatar. Official Chainlink website has an article written by a fucking frogposter. This project is a joke and will never be taken seriously.

>>52877369
>pilpul
>>52877218
>just deliver a product and stop fucking around with our funds
Retard

>>52878388
Seriously, I would feel a lot better about him if he dropped the frog imagery and just tried to blend in with the rest of the organization.

>>52877225
This. It's the only thing i can pardon Betraymoto for : using our cash to grossly overpay an army of woke HR roasties who accomplished strictly NOTHING but eating like like pigs on OUR dime.

>>52877322
STFU retarded nigger

>>52878388
pretty fucking embarrassing. Imagine institutions reading through it, and yet they have the balls to try and distance from the apparent nazi blue board.

>>52876769
>distance from clg
Nice divisive-fud attempt, but I'm afraid CLG is a well-respected ambassador for Chainlink and as such commands more respect than you with your fat belly and Dorito crumbs all down your front. Pic very much rel.

>>52878748
can't pardon*

>>52878791

>>52878791
>CLG in full dmg control
>so desperate he screencap the one plebbit fanboi he have on twitterino
You are pathetic my dude. Get off your high horses, you are the embodiment of the nothingburger. Cringe.

>>52878791
>signal/noise ratio just isn't the same
He is not wrong, but still an enormous faggot. Fact is that none of this would have mattered if the price action wasn't so abysmal.
>Muh Adelyn
>Muh marketing
>Muh HR roasties
>Muh Zachary
>Muh drum dancers
>Muh token dilution
We're just scrambling for people/things to point our finger at here at /biz/ to cope with the price action of the past 2.5 years. Fact is that things are chugging along at Chainlink and the reason for the shit price action is probably something along the lines of:
>retrace from blow off top
>no action in bull run because only marketmaker/cefi interest in Chainlink was on the short side, literally 0 interest otherwise

>>52878791

Biz has been right all along
>right about LINK
>right about NEXO being zeus
>right about market suppressing LINK and the DEFI wallets(Celsius and FTX)
>right about Chainlink needing to change marketing strategy(demoted Adelyn, changed it up lately)
>right about staking and not needing to buy LINKPOOL despite jonny spamming the board for years inorganically rugging a few dumb anons

And now guess what? Right about Chaintwinkgod too. They need to distance themselves from him unless he tidies up his fucking act but better to just avoid.

All he does is repackage biz content and spoonfeeders in a more midwit way to make himself proud. He does more damage than good. I’ve seen his fud “rebuttals” which amount to condescending scoffing and better than thou(not good for a “brand ambassador” is it?) or just sperging midwit paragraphs and failing to address it when anons on here can dispel the same fud in a single sentence

>>52878883
>if the price action wasn't so abysmal.
There's a very obvious reason why price action is abysmal.

Yep we are pumping bois, congrats marines we are fucking back!

>>52878899

Chaintwink god is pumping his dildo into his little twink body

>>52878797
>>52878844
>>52878880
>>52878883
^^^^ Ha ha so easily baited! Look at the screeching trannies all teased from their little holes by a titbit. Too easy to rile these losers. Look at this wall of shite >>52878883 kek you can imagine him sitting there in his piss stained pyjamas and little crusts around his mouth, hunched over his keyboard, clacking away, furiously muttering obscenities. Lol this shower of losers really are too much

Just opened the thread. Is it worth reading or is it just the usual fudding seething retardation?

>>52878904
>Chaintwink god is pumping his dildo into his little twink body
Chainlinkgod is cringe and should in no way present Chainlink in an official capacity, but this thinly veiled homo erotic obsession with him is weird as fuck

>>52876769
>chainlink offers to be the useless jewish middleman between the blockchain and data
no thanks

>>52878938
>should in no way present Chainlink in an official capacity
Have some self-awareness; /biz/ is the absolute last place you should be whining about who gets to represent Chainlink.

>>52878923

Idk what is worse. Him or you for getting mad at people hurting your favourte e-celebrity.

Imagine being a nuthugger for chaintwinkngod of all people

>>52878931
It's funny toward the end becuz you have CLG having an aneurism after we called him a useless nigger.
Look at this >>52878923 kek. Typical of his self fart huffing. Imagine being egomaniac when your only accomplishment at life is being a namefag shilling for a vaporwave token.

>>52878931
Not worth. >>52878180 pic is interesting if you didn't catch it last year.

>>52878923
You think you're slick, but it's pretty obvious what you're trying to do here.

>>52878948
/biz/ is as good a place as any to discuss Chainlink figureheads. Just because we are anon does not mean we can't criticize some namefag on Twitter

>>52878965
>/biz/ is as good a place as any to discuss Chainlink figureheads
After 4 years of wall-to-wall Chainlink fud, it really really REALLY isn't.

>>52878968
Please expand on why it is un-self aware to shit on CLG on /biz/. What does FUD have to do with it?

>>52878975
Regardless of where you stand on Chainlink, whatever you think CLG is doing wrong, /biz/ has been doing a million times worse for many years.

>>52878965
Alright thanks for saving me a lot of time

>>52878968

It still has a better “noise to signal ratio” than anywhere else. Even if oldfags are bored and stopped posting/ spoonfeeding and are just waiting. In honesty there isnt much to discuss, just waiting. All we can so is constructive criticism at this point to speed things along.
We long passed the chasm.

The reason twink god thinks the noose to signal ratio is better on twitter is because he gets high on his own farts and repackaged biz screenshots and thinks that counts. Hes totally oblivious to the festering shit outside his own posts

>>52878983
Why should I, as an anonymous individual on /biz/, refrain from criticizing something because /biz/ as a collective has been doing worse for many years? Not to mention that /biz/ has never been an official channel for Chainlink so this comparison is moot anyway.

>>52878990
We can't have threads on /biz/ without derailment because there are multiple mentally ill posters who see it as their heavenly duty to rack up dozen pbtid if someone dares mention that other projects diluted their tokens more than Chailink, without it having an adverse effect on the price (like in this thread). Or when someone points out that Chainlink marketing isn't nearly as bad as portrayed, instant 30pbtid. At least Twitterfags have the ability to build an echo chamber and drown all that noise out, which can be a plus if you can't handle it.

Point is that noise has gone x10 these past 2 years while signal is barely existent on /biz/.

>>52879003
You can do anything you want on here, but ad-homming people just instantly becomes part of the noise pile.

>>52878990
>It still has a better “noise to signal ratio” than anywhere else
I truly don't think so. Virtually every Link thread gets shit up by one of the resident 50pbtid id swappers.

>>52879062

Maybe my experience is just different. I still make a ton of threads putting in some effort and have conversations with non retard anons plenty. Sometimes those conversations are instantly dismissed as “FUDDDSD” when its really just a critical discussion.

Maybe if i were just a reader the experience would be different. I filter out those 50pbtid id swappers pretty easily because by now they are stale and easy to spot due to their repetitive language.

If someone manages to critisize marketing or some aspect without saying “sergey scammer fat lier delay 5 years 5% homo $6 chainshit rosties” i know they arent a fudding fag and its a legit discussion

>>52876769
The whole twitter strategy the last few years as been abysmal. An absolute failure that's hard to describe in words.
I know multiple people who have been on CT for many years now and the common thread among is them is:
>no idea what Chainlink is or does, other than associating things like hacks with 'failed oracles'
>they fucking HATE Chainlink with a burning passion and 'marines'
Congrats on this, seriously. Especially when CT collectively moves billions in liquidity towards various shitcoins.
Yes, I hold link and I'm fucking livid.

>>52879100
>If someone manages to critisize marketing or some aspect without saying “sergey scammer fat lier delay 5 years 5% homo $6 chainshit rosties”
This never ever happened in my experience.
Literally every single "muh legit criticism" poster eventually outs himself as a "TNN fat scammer HR roasties" fudder, like in pic related.

>>52879122
>I know multiple people who have been on CT for many years now and the common thread among is them is:
>>no idea what Chainlink is or does
And yet Chainlink has more integrations and partners than literally any crypto out there, short of maybe ETH.

This necessarily means that what you're saying is completely horseshit.

>>52879122

Thats the difference between echo chamber and biz.
The only reason chainlink is despised on biz is because its price is lower than desired and still its talked about non stop all day every day.

Back when it was doing very well in 2019-2021 people on twitter hated LINK even though it was going up because chaintwinkgod and his nuthuggers were just that fucking irritating. Even biz hated on them from the moment they popped up.

>>52876769
I'm in digital marketing and specialize on social media algorithms. And the sad truth is Chainlink's twitter rating is completely fucked and it's pretty easy to see. All of their posts get almost the same amount of likes (around 1k) and they spam out posts 3-5 times a day. The reason for that is that the people who interact are the same group all the time, it's just the core twitter link marine fan base. When behavior like that is detected by any algorithm nowadays, it's actually bad for the content creator. The algorithm is taught to think these kinds of sites are niche and not interesting to the average user. So the algorithm doesn't recommend it to anyone who isn't already interacting with the related hashtags and keywords. News sites are inherently different and do well, same goes for meme sites. Those are pages where the majority of interaction comes from non-followers because people are more likely to share the content outside their circle, tag friends who aren't followed to the pages and so on.

If Chainlink wants to reach the general crypto audience, they need to start a new account I'm afraid. Or maybe let Sergey post more generally, and just in between shilling LINK. But he's way to passive to be a thought leader and influencer to bring people into the project, exact opposite are Vitalik and Charles.

>>52878949
>e celebrity
Hardly. He keeps his identity anonymous. That's the polar opposite of being a celebrity. You lot cant stand him because he's way too big brained for your tiny minds. The cope is off the charts. Try harder, lad.

>>52879151
>Back when it was doing very well in 2019-2021 people on twitter hated LINK even though it was going up because chaintwinkgod
What the absolute fuck are you even saying.

Also, even in 2018-2019-2020 when Link was absolutely blasting, /biz/ was wall-to-wall Link fud just like it has been during the past two years.
Hell, the entire Zeus Capital report was 99% /biz/ fud from that time.

>>52879180

STOP MAKING FUN OF CHAIN LINK GOD

>>52879180
I honestly think this entire gay little hate campaign against CLG is coming from someone like Chris Blec, who gets his ass handed to him publicly by CLG on a regular basis.

>>52879128

As said, i fond at least one poster having good criticism with when i make a decent thread. Maybe its cause i make the threads. I definitely see people do one liners in them when we have back and w calling me a samefag tho.

That said yeah your pic is a common experience too

>>52879062
>ad-homming people just instantly becomes part of the noise pile.
Don't care, I don't have a strong opinion towards CLG anyway. Just think they never should've hired him in an official manner so it's easier to distance from him/his branding when neccesary.

>>52879144
>This necessarily means that what you're saying is completely horseshit.
Both can be true at the same time. It's just that many anons still operate under the impression that Chainlink needs or wants to market to normies (aka CT). It's obvious they are trying really hard on one hand to get programmers and projects on board (by doing hackathons, tons of guides on youtube etc), and on the other hand get institutions on board as node operators and data providers (which we can see in the form of AP, Deutsche Telekom etc etc). Besides these two, anons here would also like Chainlink to court crypto twitter and pajeet Telegram groups solely because it would pump the price. This is just something Chainlink have shown many and many times again that they will not do, as it would not help them progress any of their internal goals.

>>52879224
>Both can be true at the same time
No, they really can't.
Virtually all of these hundreds of crypto projects that end up partnering with Chainlink learn about them the exact same way you and I learned about Chainlink; from public forums, social media, crypto events, etc.

>>52879052
Thats what happens when you scam people. Dont promise massive gains only to have your “bear market coin” drop 90% you fucking piece of shit

>>52879177

This is what i mean. There are multiple interesting and decent criticisms and discussion/posts a day like this, but often they are dismissed as the “chainshit roastie” brigagde in disguise and called fudders. No. Learn the difference.

We crossed the chasm already, and its largely a waiting game. All there is left is to try criticise and discuss aspects to lead to success.
The chainlink team is definitely bloated, and whether thats a good thing or not is up to you but imo it clearly can create information flow issues and blind spots in the company. However i see steps to improve it lately.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this anons point was completed unconsidered till lately. Why? We know adelyn was not too great as the project grew. She was the CMO, why would she have researched these insights if she thought she was doing a good job?

>>52879144
>le heckin integrations

Hang yourself, seriously. Remember when you fucking IDIOTS used to argue that spamming every scam integration on twitter 6 times a day was “marketing”. God theres so many losers here its amazing

>>52879265
>Remember when you fucking IDIOTS used to argue that spamming every scam integration on twitter 6 times a day was “marketing”.
How is it not?

i know this is insane to say but i actually feel a slight wind of bullishness from this.
Like i can see a very faint light at the end of the tunnel.

>>52879246
Imagine if every coin ever shilled on /biz/ that is now down from ATH, would have posters dedicated to making 10-15 threads and 40-50 posts daily because they got "scammed" lmao

>>52879247
You're being stubborn for no reason.
>>I know multiple people who have been on CT for many years now and the common thread among is them is:
>>no idea what Chainlink is or does
>>And yet Chainlink has more integrations and partners than literally any crypto out there, short of maybe ETH.
Both can be true. Chainlink doesn't market to CT, so it's understandable that CT is clueless while actual projects and companies are integrating Chainlink.

>>52879297
Even if what you're saying is true, then those people that guy supposedly knows must be people who ONLY get their crypto information from Twitter.
Because if all of those hundreds of partners didn't learn about Chainlink on Twitter, they must've learned about them literally everywhere else.

>>52879276

Its boring marketing that gets completely lost in the algo and ignored.
They could do better, like bundling it up into an external blog post and bloat their own website where it wont matter.
They could do so much better its painful honestly. It was fine very early on when it was clawing users to climb to the top. Now its the standard already. Of course people are going to use chainlink. Thats how they need to be marketing themselves honestly.

>>52879323
Tell me how other coins marketed better.

>>52879297

Chainlink has tried to market to CT man, and adelyn just did a bad job. Wake up. Why the hell do you think they even made chaintwinkgod an ambassador and sponsored all them fags, and tried to appeal to them on Smartcon marketing?

Adelyn was a literally who harvard graduate with only experience in TINY seed round small little startups. Her marketing skills finish there. Unfortunately chainlink outgrew that approach about a year after she joined them

>>52879320
Fair, but I think there is a huge difference between people looking for projects to invest in and teams/companies looking for a specific solution to a problem they are experiencing. The information out there on Twitter and in blogposts will reach the second group way easier, as it is specifically designed for them.

If Chainlink wanted to market to the first group they would use very different language and topics for their tweets/blogposts (token burn! +10% APY for staking! android and IOS wallet app! referral program now live!)

>>52879375

Does eth tweet about every single user it has? No. That is ridiculous and it’s ridiculous for the exact same reason it’s ridiculous for chainlink to make that a core of their marketing on twatter at this point

>>52879276
It’s pointless, noone read them.
They should make kino IBM like commercials.

>27 posts by this ID
>Hasn't said nigger or fag even once
Hmmmmmm...

>>52879384
>I think there is a huge difference between people looking for projects to invest in and teams/companies looking for a specific solution to a problem they are experiencing
When the people looking for projects to invest in do their surface-level research, they'll find out that probably most of the projects they're considering are working with Chainlink.

>>52879414
It's fairly easy to id this poster by his arguments. To imply he is a "Chainlink Labs" employee is retarded. Huge cope by fuddies who can't fathom that people enjoy discussing (or "defending") their investment online, opposed to obsessively shitting on it.

>>52879144
>intergrations
lmao "Chainlink partnership sir!!!" is the biggest meme in crypto.
Obviously there are a few legit interesting integrations, but for the most part its been a huge joke.
>>52879265
Exactly.

why continue with Chainlink when you could start from 0 with a new project like Portus Network, the ICO will follow, it's still a Blockchain Oracle with different approaches than Chainlink.

>>52879469
>lmao "Chainlink partnership sir!!!" is the biggest meme in crypto.
lel guess what, 99% of Chainlink's crypto integrations are the same things that give ETH, Matic, ... their only reason for existing.

>>52879426
>When the people looking for projects to invest in do their surface-level research, they'll find out that probably most of the projects they're considering are working with Chainlink.
"This L1 will beat ETH!" "Wow, that means if I buy x tokens I will x20 my portfolio if they reach ETH's marketcap! I will now shill this fact to everyone on ct and in my telegram groups"

Even if Chainlink ever wanted to market to these people, they would have to beat the above because that is what surface-level research entails for the average CT fag. Spoiler: You can't condense Chainlink enough to get this kind of hype around it. Only good price action will attract these people to the project without them understanding it.

>>52879572
If these same people do their surface level research into Link, they'll find a lot bigger upside potential than any L1, not in the least because of Swift.

>>52879596
Yes, in a perfect world the average person wouldn't be a complete retard. Getting upset that this isn't the case will not help you.

>>52878884
Chainlinkgod is a faggot but this is fucking retarded to think CLL need to distance themselves from him. He doesn't have any impact whatsoever on the project beyond a few opinion blogs

>>52879614
The problem is you're trying to argue that these people are thinking logically.

>>52878893
>There's a very obvious reason why price action is abysmal.
Enlighten us

>>52879631
Well, what happens 99% of the time when something big happens for Link?

>>52879572
>Only good price action will attract these people to the project without them understanding it.
Exactly.
So all you need to do in order to suppress Link regardless of all the massive news, is to make sure it dumps whenever it gets massive news.

>>52879626
They are thinking a certain way. We can observe this and draw our conclusions from it. This doesn't mean I think it is logical at all. It's logical to them, which is what matters when you want to analyze the behavior.

>>52879676
Which has been proven to be very successful.

>>52879713
>They are thinking a certain way. We can observe this
We can only observe outcomes, not underlying rationales.

>Which has been proven to be very successful.
Extremely.

>>52879177
Chainlink doesn’t need social media.

>>52879643
It usually coincides with some black swan event

>>52879790
Yes, isn't it funny how that works?

>>52879810
Hilarious.

Chainlink network is poised to capture 100B revenue. If the tokenomics work like they should a token price over $1000 shouldn't be out of the question. Wealthy people in SWIFT, WEF, banks, Google etc are aware of Chainlink. Why is the price action so bad? Is it because:
1. Macro market environment is bad
2. Institutions and the people inside are still wary of the regulations and don't want to take position until things are more clear.
3. Chainlink haven't done a lot of work with SWIFT and banks yet and they want to see the technology work first.
4. The tokenomics won't actually work like we think and SWIFT will use the technology like public good. (The shadow fork)
5. ?