/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52683011
Invest heavily into street cleaners and water purification.

>>52683011
MAXIMUM KEK
IS THIS THE /BIZ/ HUMOR THREAD?
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>52683145
real money is in underdeveloped countries
you are a retard if you think you can have same growth rate in 1st world.

>>52683348

>>52683405
You cannot have the same growth rate for variety of reasons.
for example how do you increase electricity output in usa by 100%? it requires a lot of infestments
how do you increase electricity output in a village in india that runs with one generator? you just add another, voila output is increasaed by 100%. Growth is far more possible there
3rd world does not guarantee high returns but thats the risk you are willing to take

furthermore 1st worlders don't have kids, bunch of elderly farts who produce nothing and consoom little except for drain on healthcare are not good for economy in the long run.

>>52683499
>Infestments
C'mon Sudhir, who are you fooling. If India was to be a superpower they would have already been. You have been rugpulled from birth.

>>52683011
india and china were both raped by british people 100 years ago, but china is now much more successful than india
why?

>>52683011
>India in 2070
>its literally an unihabitable wasteland with daytime temperatures of +70 centigrade and no water because they wouldn't stop pumping coal out in an attempt to become superpoopers.
lol

>>52683619
>raped by British
>had their country made by them
Pick one. China has always been the most populous place on earth, and for most of history has had one of the most powerful GDP - even in the 18th/19th century. India didn't exist as a nation until the British created it out of warring princedoms and city states.

>>52683011
>Profit off of
>*Profit from
Nigger

>>52683011
Invest in bnb. Shitcoinscammers depend havily on it. Imagine 100 million jeets shilling on biz. That would only be a fraction of the real possibility

>>52683011
idk man do you think you're going to be alive in 2070?

>>52683605
>If India was to be a superpower they would have already been
And they were, read some history dumdum. India and China historically were more powerful than Europe and Japan. Modern day situation is backwards and perverted and enabled entirely by US bankrolling their allies.

>>52683605
what I'm saying is correct
if you want high returns you need to put into places that has potential, not guarantee but potential of high return.

whats up with this cope about how everything must be number on in 1st world? cant you just admit in some parts it is quite natural that 1st world to lag? by the sheer reason of it is 1st world?
developing under developed countries is more easy than improving developed countries. stop taking offense on every trivial shit

>>52683605
If Ukraine was always a shitty place and now it's a superpower because USA gives them billions and trillions. You can become a superpower in a year

>>52683011
>>52683348
That is true. The thing is India is not underdeveloped - you get what others give you, which is about right. White people rule the world cause they were succesfully building their civilizations over centuries. Curiosity and drive to development were a key. Indians lack mental capabilities to organize and invent. All you can do is sloppy copying so you're never gonna take the lead.

You had luck that British conquered you and brang industrial revolution along. Otherwise you wouldnt be different than african niggers living in mud huts to this day.

>>52683011
India has the most fertile lands in the world, just imagine if they murdered a billion of Dalits and used the space to cultivate for the upcoming famine.

>>52684223
pottery

>>52683011
>How do I profit off of India becoming the biggest economy in the world?
I'm not going to say that's impossible but as always lets think about what that even means.
India has >4x the population of the USA, so if their economy was of equal size, they'd still be making 1/4 as much as Americans so a much larger chunk of their income would be spent on necessities instead of disposable income and luxury goods.

>>52683499
6% growth of 50 is 53.

>>52683011
Tbh I like India the most if I had to buy into an economy outside the US. They are an expanding economy, some of the wealthiest people are coming from India now. Coupled with the fact that they don’t have democracy means you can probably find some good returns. Trouble is I know nothing about how their finance system works or where to start

>>52683348
This is actually the truth and you are high iq. Investing in 1st world countries is like investing in Btc and Eth, there won’t be as much multiples on your investment as they are already so big while investing in the emerging economies are like buying ICP or Chainlink. They have so much more room for exponential growth.

>>52684801
whites only ruled for last 400 years, 500 if you strech a bit you think your current situation as historical inevitability which is wrong
your schizos try to portray egyptians and mespotamians white due to this schizo belief

british for example lived in absolute shitholes before roman conquest but when they dominated the world no one cared about romans, just food for thought

>>52685166
sure don't get me wrong some developed world can really get you good returns too, especially usa where it has more 3rd world shitholeism than say europe, less labor rights etc which enables more returns.
>>52685323
But when you tell that to the mr 16 year old firstie he takes offense I'm serious some of these people are absolute nuts
>how dare some village in africa has a higher chance of improving itself than my high tech saturated city!