/biz/ - Business & Finance

i can't wait until the fed dabs on linkies and sends your coins to pennies

wouldnt touch link unless it got to $4, really $3

chances of getting in post early-access? of that 25-75 mil how likely is it all getting filled in early-access?
>t. linklet 2022

>The most important asset in crypto
based LPL chad

>>52461816
lmao we dumped our $0.20 bags at $50. i rebought 100k at $6 but already wish I hadn't and am slowly buying 10% of the supply of Fringe Finance.

if you don't have 100K LINK, you will never make it. 5M FRIN and you're good senpai.
GL!

>>52461877
Will market buy 100K if LINK goes to $3

I can't wait to stake my 250 link and earn 1 link per month ($6).

Taking a shit on my bosses desk tomorrow.

An expensive Chainlink hurts Sergey's business, children. Link is only useful buying Chainlink services which he wants to become industry standard. Stop trying to hurt Sergey

>>52461816
I'm not getting my hopes up. I bet a nuke will drop the same day as staking.

>>52462109
That will be $1000 per month some day

>>52462133
18 decimal places

>>52461816
So it’s six years now since 1k eoy was supposed to happen. Anon you got scammed

What day does their tokenomics drop?

Link please?

I keep buying Link even though I have over 60k of them lmao
Fud just had this weird effect of making me dig my heels in harder. Whenever I do that it always ends up in my favour eg vaccines. The more they've told me I must take them the more I said fuck you. Guess I'm lucky to be wired this way. I guess a few of us are huh

>>52462163
The Bulgarian ESL trannies have never fully translated the white paper.

>>52461816
you heard it here folks, only two more weeks

but the thing is the version being released is beta and it's capped at 25M LINK. I don't get why you're bullish.

anyone else afraid they wont get in unless they pay 1000 gwei fees on the first block?
only 3.5k marines with 7k LINK will get in

>>52462535
>I don't get why you're bullish.
Because I have a brain and am not Bulgarian

>>52461816
this pump is unsustainable. this pump is dangerous. this pump is exuberant. this pump is irrational. this pump is foolish. This pump needs to be shut down and sold and forgotten. This pump went on far too long and far too high, but the irrational market exuberance is finally coming to an end. And what a bitter end it will be for all those too greedy and proud to sell everything.

>>52461816

My body is ready.

https://youtu.be/L70jsue-wEg

>>52461816
Are they really suppressing LINK just because it's all kikes in charge and they don't want people that say kikes to make it? We're all just kidding, you know, it's just locker room talk. You can let us have 9 figures, we won't do anything.

>>52461816
It's crazy how dramatically the board has changed. There's basically no hype right now and even in the wake of what is perhaps the highest profile blow up in crypto history that everyone unanimously agrees could have been avoided in a world where PoR is the standard and staking confirmed for release in a few weeks nobody cares. In a way Chainlink feels more underground now than it did in 2017-2018. The media/crypto influencer/VC conspiracy to ignore and marginalize Chainlink was successful.

>>52463148
I feel like it's 10% malicious conspiracy and 90% everyone is still so retarded that nobody really knows why smart contracts are exciting, even after all this time.
Look at all the "crypto hedge funds" and shit that blew up on the back of FTX. People in charge of literally billions just held them on a CEX.
The unbelievable, profound and universal ignorance of nearly everyone in the crypto scene has far exceeded my wildest expectations.
When everyone is that fucking dumb, it's easy for the few remaining bad actors to succeed in keeping hype away from LINK.

>>52462056
thanks just bought 100k

>>52463186
You could honestly be right. Even if that is the case I remember the amazon paper Bezos wrote to shareholders about his stock price
>The stock market is a voting machine short term. A weighing machine long term.
Even if it doesn’t happen immediately I’m not selling. I agree with that post that most crypto investors have the attention span of a goldfish when in reality the people who made the most money (most often) were holders who believed in their projects.

: - )

>>52462024
100K is the suicide stack. 1M is the make it stack

>>52463136
>Are they really suppressing LINK just because it's all kikes in charge and they don't want people that say kikes to make it?

Actually yes kek, but even they have their timelines they need to meet

Fucking kikes

>5 discord trannies desperately trying to create hype for beta staking after 6 years of holding
>muh retarded market participants cannot appreciate le tokenomics of le most important asset in crypto
perhaps they will once it breaches $2
rope yourselves disgusting tranny niggers

>>52463851
just filter link threads if they make you so angry, bro. you gotta look after your mental health.

>>52461816
Link's tokenomics have been in full effect since the first day of mainnet.

>>52462271
>I keep buying Link
I bought at ath when you guys won't stop talking about it, it's still hanging their in my portfolio, i dunno maybe I'd buy more if it goes low to $4, but rn, Ride is my next target, the cloudbreakers game is going to be a bang.

>>52463851
cope and seethe nolinker scum

>>52461816
SERGAY TURNED INTO A COUCH; IT'S OVER

>>52463487
>the people who made the most money (most often) were holders who believed in their projects.
>Prospectively
Still going to be the case with people that believe in projects with high pump potential in the next bull run e.g. privacy projects that may become more relevant as speculations around regulations increase

>>52463186
>>52465802
>he unbelievable, profound and universal ignorance of nearly everyone in the crypto scene has far exceeded my wildest expectations.
Everyone just wants ease and convenience. CEXes provides that to some extent. In the same way, there is a general conclusion that no one in crypto cares about privacy which is wrong. If the options to be private comes easy, the impression will be different.

>>52463911
How true is that

>>52465856
Based

>>52466626
Nothing ever happened on mainnet without the token.

what would cause the token to reach $1000 each? thats a $1trillion marketcap

>>52466626
Not true at all, otherwise why would they need to release Economics 2.0?

>>52461816
>almost 2023
>chainlink still useless, pivoting every year
nobody cares about your shitcoin get lost

>>52468546
>thats a $1trillion marketcap
yes

>>52463734
facts. it was always this way. OGs = ICO buyers only
imagine buying post-Coinbase listing and thinking you're early

2 more weeks?

>>52468546
Only circulating supply counts, so with 90% of tokens locked in contracts and pools it's just a 100B mcap, literally not even that much. Hell, useless crap like doge came close to that valuation..

>>52470549
AAPL has $2tn and AMZN has $1tn market cap. I think Link is great but it is not going to generate more revenue than either of those companies anytime soon. In 5-10 years when the crypto space is capturing more financial traffic it will be worth that, but I'm being realistic.
It's a good buy now but even reaching $100bn marketcap right now would be based on extremely optimistic growth projections.

Not to mention we are only a few months into Great Depression 2.0.

I'm holding Link for my kids and grandkids to have a shot. Not for me.

>>52473728
bitcoin hit $1 trillion mcap and it literally generates 0 revenue

>>52461816
Not gonna lie i'm pretty excited about being able to stake. I don't even care about the price. But can you imagine if stacking was released in April of 2021? We would have easily hit $150

>>52463148
Chainlinks PoR only works for wrapped tokens you dumbfucks, it doesnt work for bank accounts/exchanges.

>>52474159
I'm just trying to be realistic so we don't get (further) demoralized if it doesn't happen. Nobody would love the price singularity more than me though.
Hang in there, it was always meant to be a steady climb commensurate with network growth.

>>52474159
this is the most midwit take ive ever seen in my 30 year old boomer lifer

>>52461816
>>52462708
>>52473728
I am not bullish, I am beyond bearish.

Chainlink is a globohomo shitcoin of the highest order and is going straight to zero.
Your days of shitting up biz with your astroturfed psyops are over. You've been found guilty of using DARPA bots, paid shills and sybil attacks to push the WEF agendas, and for that you will pay with your miserable life.
You shills and bagholders will be financially EXTERMINATED and there is nothing you can do about it except watch in horror as it all comes tumbling down. The ride ends here for you linkies, the game is over.

>>52463186
even on a tv show albeit with top tier advisors like billions they showed proper opsec as the crypto storage for the big boys, yet the actual big boys acted like mega retards really makes you wonder

>>52463148
you really think this is coming soon, have they released any real details yet about staking, let alone a date when you can unstake
this ftx debacle has probably set their timeline back quite a bit, no fud just have to be realistic at this point

>>52463148
>>52463186
Yeah, it’s been a painful blackpill to swallow. This place is so awful to visit now, the infestation of shills/Pajeets/scammers, the dominance of CT/influencoooors has really degraded the quality of discussions here. Really sick of it. The first one is whatever, you kinda expect that but I’m really sick of CT and the amount of faggots that take their word as gospel. Let’s not even get into how many of you niggers on CT who are browsing this very thread so you can screencap and post on Twitter.

Kinda makes you have mixed feelings about all of this. Given how fucking stupid most people are how can you argue that humanity doesn’t deserve the CBDC hell that awaits us? How is it possible that we’re still seeing centralized scams gaining so much power and influence and collapsing everything? Obviously there’s evidence to suggest that FTX wasn’t an organic operation, but still by and large most faggots in this dumb industry enabled their success. I’m looking at all the niggers on CT who put their referral links in their bio and blatantly shilled FTX over the last 2 years. All of these guys should be named and shamed and each one minted as an NFT and when Ari finally releases assassination contracts there’ll be a bit of a deterrent for these niggers.

So many things have happened in the last 2 years that is directly at odds with the ethos of cryptocurrencies and decentralization. How was it possible that VC backed projects in ended up becoming so successful? How is it possible that people actually handed over their money to Celsius, BlockFi and Nexo and not have any suspicions on how they conducted their business? I just don’t get it. When you dangle easy money in front of dumb, poor people the results are absolutely disastrous.

>>52462024
>we

>>52468958
Are you actually retarded?