/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52305621
atleast we had 2 days of decent pumperino before the next blackswan

>>52305802
haha yeah december is going to be crazy...

>>52305621
LINKies are the most funny bagholders in crypto history. I can't wait for someone in 5 years to do a youtube documentary 'Link-Marines'

Cohencidence after cohencidence after cohencidence after conhencidence...

>>52305621
Don't worry. Chainlink will be back in top 10 soon by the process if elimination

>>52305873
haha yeah really makes me think

Fuuuck, I thought it would sustain at $7.00-$7.50 until Wednesday. Gone are the days if me getting giddy and shifts on the dollar level than the pennies we see shift now... I had hope that the prophecy was come true. Fucking always a coincidence that an exchange just so happens to blow up around this time.

You know what, think of the bright side. FTT and SOL are having catastrophic losses.

oh look

$6.66

>>52306357
not anymore wheres bottom?

Chainlink and Sergey are so fucking reckless. If they had just focused on the base protocol and got full staking out the door then Link would have at least partially decoupled from BTC and instead be driven based on the fees the network earns. But nooooooo, that fat fuck had to chase his fucking side projects and leave his token over-exposed to any movement in BTC. Absolute fucking disaster.

>>52306459
will it ever recover?

>>52306523
>will it ever recover

>>52306523
Until full staking is released, Link is totally at the mercy of BTC. If BTC dies, then Link dies. Sergey calls Chainlink a security company, yet does zero risk management around the price of his token which drives his whole network.

>>52306380
$3.33

>>52306585
sers my hole village

>>52305621
Link is simply not allowed above 9 USD.

>>52306585
If Sergey even acknowledges the price of the token, he'll end up like XRP and LBRY

>>52306798
No one said he needs to acknowledge the price, he just needs to get full staking out the door so the Link token value starts to become dependent on the amount of fees the Chainlink network generates, rather than being at the total mercy of BTC movements.

>>52306871
Funny how only Link needs this.

>>52306884
Well Link is supposed to be driven by fundamentals right. Staking ties the fundamental value generated by the network to the token. Or are you suggesting it's actually a shitcoin that should have its value driven by speculation instead?

>>52306943
>Well Link is supposed to be driven by fundamentals
All cryptos are "supposed" to be driven by them.
Funny how only Link isn't allowed to make speculative gains.

>>52306953
Kinda what happens when the team itself says it doesn't do speculation, and then hides away for years. What do you expect? This is why you bought Link right, because it didn't do any of the hype and instead focused on the fundamentals. Don't know why you're complaining when you literally got what you wanted. You should instead be asking Sergey why it has taken so long to get a public test version of staking out. You should be asking where CCIP is.

>>52307000
>Kinda what happens when the team itself says it doesn't do speculation
Bitcoin and ETH devs did the same.

>hides away for years
Except Chainlink spent years tweeting ab out every single crypto project (no matter how small) that integrated them as Chainlink gradually took over Defi.

>>52305621
>dumps the most
>recovers the least

>>52305621
Anyone who still claims that Link suppression is a cope is a paid tranny fuder.

On the other hand, staking in december means we only have to hold out another two weeks kek.

>>52307302
>Bitcoin and ETH devs did the same.
Except for the fact that Vitalik is heavily active on social media, has outlined multiple timelines and roadmaps, discusses Ethereum concepts with the community, all of which drives interest and hype in the product.
>Except Chainlink spent years tweeting ab out every single crypto project (no matter how small) that integrated them as Chainlink gradually took over Defi.
Posting about literal who projects does nothing for Chainlink's own exposure. Who the fuck cars about LlamaFinance, or Ladyluck gambling scams. Just another example of terrible marketing strategy.
No matter how you try to spin it, Chainlink has absolutely fumbled the ball with their strategy. Slow to release products, minimal marketing, zero risk management, it has been a shambles and it's reflected in their marketcap standings. The fact that the survival of the whole project is solely at the mercy of BTC just further drives home how recklessly even the most basic of risks have been handled. Crypto is supposed to be a new step forward, yet we're making excuses for a team that supposed to have hired the smartest people in the world yet have underperformed.

>>52307542
>Except for the fact that Vitalik is heavily active on social media, has outlined multiple timelines and roadmaps, discusses Ethereum concepts with the community, all of which drives interest and hype in the product.
lol but Sergey hasn't?
See pic for instance, he trots out the trillions in derivatives market cap at every single speaking event.

>Posting about literal who projects does nothing
lel first Chainlink was hiding, but when I prove they weren't hiding it doesn't count?
You're retarded.

>>52307542
Are you a nulinker or something? Why don’t you just sell at this point instead of crying like a bitch?

>>52307578
>See pic for instance, he trots out the trillions in derivatives market cap at every single speaking event.
Wow, a picture of the derivatives market cap. Please tell me what % of that market cap Chainlink currently services? What % of those derivatives are currently on-chain? Bro why doesn't Sergey just post a picture of the world's GDP too, maybe a chart showing the transactional value of money, what about a graph of the number of grains of sand on all the beaches. Guess what, it doesn't mean shit.
>lel first Chainlink was hiding, but when I prove they weren't hiding it doesn't count? You're retarded.
Oh boy, this is the pinnacle of Linkies intelligence. Thinking that posting about partnering with Dave's Corner Store is going to get them an influx of interest. No wonder Link is struggling, the absolutely dumbest fucks are supporting this project. It makes sense that Linkies got fucking bodied by Celcius and Bancor, they saw easy targets and took advantage lol

>>52307785
Says the retard that bought the top lmao

>>52307679
>Quick, ping the discord, we need backup on /biz/ stat! 10-4 10-4, all trannies to report for duty, we need to defend Sergey!
Oh you Twitter fags are too easy to rile up

>>52307841
>defending Sergey
I have never done this and you are clearly too emotional to think straight. I honestly think you should sell though because you are clearly not built for buying and holding investments.

At the same time, wouldn't this be a boon for some late retail and institutions to get it before staking gets released? We all know that FTX was the last big player that was also part of the gang that was shorting LINK in order to keep their liquidity up

>>52307863
>doesn't deny he's a Twitter fag yet pretends to have never defended Sergey
Lol you lads are constantly on Sergey's nuts 24/7, any hint of dissent over there and you're all frothing at the mouth to prove you can deepthroat Sergey's cock the most. What's your Twitter handle? Is that you Fishy? Or is it Don? Can't be rtj since he'd be spamming hundreds of pics and links to random shit he knows nothing about.

>>52306871
sorry, v0.00001 beta of our first testnet of the beta of the second and preliminary to the alpha of possibly v0.00002 of staking is the best i can do. small dev please understand

>>52307895
No.
CZ is.
And he isn't content to own 1% of all LINK. He intends to do all in his power (and get additional backing from the CCP if needed) to destroy and replace it with something he (and his handlers) can control.

Link/btc will be green by EOD, this is no Mt Gox situation, FTX was small compared to binance and most of their volume was amadela market making

>>52307785
>Wow, a picture of the derivatives market cap
And Sergey has been telling us Chainlink is likely to tap into that for years.

>this is the pinnacle of Linkies intelligence
lmao so you were a fudder all along.

You said they were hiding, in reality Chainlink have been shilling at the top of their lungs.

>>52308228
>And Sergey has been telling us Chainlink is likely to tap into that for years.
And yet, he hasn't tapped even a tiny bit of it yet. Not even after 5 years! You just confirmed that Chainlink has underperformed massively. Remember when Sergey said 2020 was the year, oh then it became 2021, then 2022, now it's 2023 and beyond.
>You said they were hiding, in reality Chainlink have been shilling at the top of their lungs.
No roadmaps, no timelines, but shilling literal who dogshit scams is a win in a Linkies mind. Hahahaha dumbest retards on the planet, no wonder you guys lost money on Celcius and Bancor. I've got two more projects partnered with Chainlink for you to shill on Twitter, $ligmaballs and $suckdeeznuts hahaha

>>52308309
listen cuckie, I understand you're losing thousands right now, but no need to vent out your frustration on others

>>52308309
>And yet, he hasn't tapped even a tiny bit of it yet.
Neither has Vitalik.
Your point was Vitalik shilled his project, and so did Sergey.

>No roadmaps, no timelines
There go the goalposts.
You said they were hiding, and they weren't; they were shilling at the tops of their lungs.

Setting up roadmaps is a recipe for disaster 99% of the time, just look at ETH and their staking/sharding/... roadmaps.

>>52305621
token not sneeded

>>52308326
haha too easy, too too easy.
>>52308330
>Setting up roadmaps is a recipe for disaster 99% of the time, just look at ETH and their staking/sharding/... roadmaps.
Except Ethereum is currently number 2 ranked crypto and managed to complete a massive move from PoW to PoS while also having EUR 100m bonds transacted on-chain, whereas Chainlink is languishing outside the top20 and can't even give a simple start date for staking that's supposed to begin next month. Wow those roadmaps sure held back Ethereum, they should have followed your advice and just gone radio silent for years. Maybe Vitalik could instead have shilled 2,000 ERC-20 shitcoin scams in the mean time.

>>52308459
>Except Ethereum is currently number 2 ranked crypto
... because they set up countless roadmaps which they then famously failed to meet?

>>52308459
so how much did you lose, methcuck?

>>52308461
Oh, is Eth still PoW? Did I just dream is managed to go PoS? Wow crazy. What's the release date for staking? Oh wait, it's not even proper staking, just a public testnet 0.1 version lol When's v1.0 coming out? CCIP?
>>52308465
I lost my nuts in your mouth last night lol

>>52308599
>Oh, is Eth still PoW?
lmao, they spent years missing roadmap deadlines.
And ETH dumped every time another deadline got missed. ETH would unironically be valued higher right now if they had never issued any roadmaps whatsoever.

>>52307863
Nah. You got bodied in that argument and now youre being petty.

>>52308228
>likely

So he hasnt at all, and hes bragging it might happen? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Dear god the SEC is gonna steamroll this scam.

>>52308664
>and hes bragging it might happen?
Yes. It's called shilling.
The other guy said Sergey didn't do shilling, but he absolutely does.

>the SEC is gonna steamroll this scam
He shills the network, never the token.
He never even remotely associated "success of the network" with "token price going up".

kek the crippletard went to get his phone

another perfectly good fud thread ruined by this seething faggot. SAD!

>>52308224
i hope so anon, do you know how long it took to get to $9 to where we are now? 48 hours ago I'd got to bed and see link at $8.10 only to wake up at $8.70. Not sure if I'll see drastic movement in a while.

Though if the rumours were true that FTX was like Celcius, NEXO, and Voyager just dunking on LINK to prop up liquidity then I'll get happy. Though I'm not sure CZ is doing the same as well....

>>52308622
>T-trust me, Eth would be higher, n-no not like I said Chainlink would be higher this year too
Absolutely not trusting anything you say on performance, ETH has delivered and they're ranked according to the value they provide. Whether speculative or fundamental, they've been able to capture it. Chainlink hasn't, Chainlink has underperformed. Deal with it.

>>52308785
>T-trust me, Link would be higher if they set up roadmaps

>>52306871
Been away, didn’t Sergei say steaking would be out this year way back in January? What happened?

>>52308789
>bro just trust the team bro, I know they say "truth not trust" but you just have to believe bro, Sergey would never betray us, just 5 more years bro, no don't ask questions, you might make Sergey angry

>>52308937
>Sergey is hiding!
>ok so he isn't hiding, but he didn't issue roadmaps!


This exchange has been so much fun.

>>52308966
>Sergey isn't hiding, he's out here shilling scams!
>Roadmaps don't matter, you just have to believe!
>No I won't take Sergey's cock out of my mouth!
Yes, very fun exchange indeed.

>>52308966
Youre end of the exchange is desperation, grasping at straws. Also, staking 1.0 wont be released untip 2024, if it even exists.

>2 moar years marinesth!!!

>>52309049
>>Sergey isn't hiding, he's out here shilling scams!
He's shilling literally everyone who integrates Chainlink.
Since all of crypto pretty much partnered with him, many of them will be scams and/or busts.

>>Roadmaps don't matter, you just have to believe!
Oh they matter; when you miss them you lose credibility.

didn’t read not staking rise up SBFsisters fellow OG 2017 ICO 300k link marine here selling all of it

>>52308908
It didnt come out and the team went silent per usual. Unless you count their stupid ass daily twitter “updates” of pure fluff / scam “integrations”. Then at the end of smartCON opening speech, fatboy casually mentioned a test version would be out in December. Its not the actual staking though so dont expect coin price to go up. The team is paying the interest rate from the funds they stole from retail last year. This project is dead.

>>52309097
>Since all of crypto pretty much partnered with him, many of them will be scams and/or busts
So Chainlink partners with mostly scams and projects that will go bust, huge endorsement right there!
>Oh they matter; when you miss them you lose credibility.
What's better, a roadmap that gets updated on a regular basis as developments occur (a.k.a Eth), or radio silence for years in an industry notorious for scams and rugpulls? Hmmmm such a tough choice

>>52309165
>So Chainlink partners with mostly scams and projects that will go bust, huge endorsement right there!
"hurrr Chainlink bad because crypto bad!!"

>radio silence for years
Except Chainlink has been shilling itself relentlessly for years.
Radio silence was late 2017.

>>52309192
>"hurrr Chainlink bad because crypto bad!!"
We've been waiting for all the good stuff, but where is it? Where's all the traditional finance derivatives coming on chain? Where's all the huge insurance companies? Gaming? Shipping? Where anon? 5 years and counting yet zero of the good stuff Sergey keeps harping on about has happened.
>Except Chainlink has been shilling itself relentlessly for years. Radio silence was late 2017.
Tell me you're not an OG Link Marine without telling me you're not an OG Link Marine. Anyone who was here when Link first launched knows that the team was radio silent until after V2.0 of the whitepaper dropped. /biz/ was basically begging for any scraps of information, and only in 2021 did they start to try and ramp up the communication. But it was too late, who wants to get interested in a project when the whole market begins to tank. Chainlink could have positioned itself in people's minds in 2019 & 2020 after mainnet had dropped, but they decided against it and chose to hide away. Now they want attention and they can't get it since no one cares now, especially since their own token has dropped almost 90%. Shot themselves in the foot massively.

>>52309340
>We've been waiting for all the good stuff, but where is it?
In pic.

>Anyone who was here when Link first launched knows that the team was radio silent until after V2.0 of the whitepaper dropped.
Chainlink was shilling itself to high heaven way before that, you complete turd lmao.
They had the first Smartcoin nearly a year before whitepaper v2.0, what the fuck are you even saying.

"Radio silence" ended when the github went public, and Chainlink started tweeting and blogging about everything.

i have 60k link. honestly... we have to wait 2025 for another pump. we are in limbo for the next 3 years. it is devastating as i waited almost 5 years, that i ll have to suffer for another 3

>>52309413
Ah yes, the TVE metric, whatever happened to that TVL metric they were using? Oh it tanked and made Chainlink look bad? Quick better switch to another made up metric to hide our failures. TVE isn't even an accurate measure, since it double counts borrowing and swap transactions (original transaction + repayment), let alone the issues with transaction timing.
>Chainlink was shilling itself to high heaven way before that, you complete turd lmao.
And yet no one knew what Chainlink was, what the oracle problem was, who Sergey was lol Oh yes, they were totally marketing themselves all those years, you just saw Chainlink everywhere!. You know there is a world outside your discord right.

>>52309560
>Ah yes, the TVE metric, whatever happened to that TVL metric they were using?
They were using "total value secured".
I guess they liked the sound of "enabled" more.

Also, I thought you wanted Sergey to shill?

>And yet no one knew what Chainlink was
There go the goalposts again; we were talking about "radio" silence.
That ended in early 2018.

>>52305621
Alright so can we get 1 fucking pump without some sort of apocalyptic event ruining everything?
Can LINK pump without a global "pandemic" shutting down the economy for 2+ years?
Can we get a pump without a massive war in Europe erupting, threatening to escalate into WW3?
Can we get a pump without some massive black swan event crashing the entire crypto market?

Jesus FUCK just give me a break
At this rate you will see me on the news very soon

>>52309666
HONKHONK. The universe is laughable
Also checked

>>52309639
Except TVL, TVS, and TVE are all totally different metrics with different limitations.
>Also, I thought you wanted Sergey to shill?
What people want: "Chainlink is proud to announce Link staking going live on the 3rd of December, with a guaranteed 5% return + disbursement of BUILD tokens. The available pool size will be increased by 5m tokens each fortnight, and the current roadmap is to release v1.0 within six months"
What people get: "Chainlink is proud to announce $catpisstoken will use one VRF call to mint NFT's which it will then try to market scam users"
>There go the goalposts again; we were talking about "radio" silence. That ended in early 2018.
So according to you, massive marketing and shilling was going on and yet it failed so significantly that literally no one outside of people who bought Chainlink tokens knew who they were. That sounds like a colossal under-achievement, an absolute failure, disaster of the worst kind.

>>52309838
>Except TVL, TVS, and TVE are all totally different metrics with different limitations.
TVL is locked tokens.
TVS and TVE are pretty much the same thing afaik.

>What people want: "Chainlink is proud to announce Link staking
>What people get: "Chainlink is proud to announce $catpisstoken
You want both, obviously.

>So according to you, massive marketing and shilling was going on and yet it failed so significantly
Chainlink trended upwards for two years against the entire market starting in mid-2018 and culminating in reaching rank 5.
I'd say it was a massive success.

>>52305621
DRNS

>>52309878
TVS and TVE is nowhere near the same thing lol WTF do you really think Chainlink was securing more than 6 trillion! That's 7x more than the current crypto marketcap! No wonder Linkies are delusional if this is what they believe.
>Chainlink trended upwards for two years against the entire market starting in mid-2018 and culminating in reaching rank 5. I'd say it was a massive success.
Just like EOS, they were ranked 4th! Huge success! You must be heavily invested in EOS. How about BCH, they were the 5th ranked coin! OMG anon, all these successful coins, how rich you must be!

>>52310153
>TVS and TVE is nowhere near the same thing lol WTF do you really think Chainlink was securing more than 6 trillion!
TVS is snapshots while TVE is over a period of time, but they measure the same thing.
TVE is more accurate since snapshots don't represent what's actually going on.
Also, the number is bigger so it's better for shilling.

>Just like EOS
There go some more goalposts lmao

You said Chainlink's marketing didn't do anything, but the reality is Chainlink started a 2-year uptrend against the market almost immediately after radio silence ended in early 2018.

>>52310246
>TVS is snapshots while TVE is over a period of time, but they measure the same thing.
Lol wtf, they don't even measure close to the same thing. TVS is the aggregate amount of TVL within all protocols and platforms that depend on the proper operation of an oracle network to protect user funds. TVE is the aggregate monetary value of transactions within a given time period. TVS is asset value, TVE is transactional value. Totally different. Like saying cash in the bank and velocity of cash are the same thing lol
>You said Chainlink's marketing didn't do anything, but the reality is Chainlink started a 2-year uptrend against the market almost immediately after radio silence ended in early 2018.
So why is Chainlink now 21st even though they've been marketing more heavily in 2022? Should be number 1 coin now right according to you. 1,500+ scams shilled and counting!

>>52310503
>TVS is the aggregate amount of TVL
TVS is "smart contract value secured", i.e. literally everything Chainlink mainnet does, i.e. all transactions. Locked tokens are only part of that.

>So why is Chainlink now 21st
Because of pic related.
The fact is that immediately after Chainlink started shilling in the first half of 2018, Chainlink trended upwards against the entire market for two full years.

>>52310789
>TVS is "smart contract value secured", i.e. literally everything Chainlink mainnet does, i.e. all transactions. Locked tokens are only part of that.
Oh boy, you better not let ChainLinkGod and The_Crypto_Oracle hear that you think they have the wrong definition of TVS? https://smartcontentpublication.medium.com/defining-total-value-secured-tvs-in-decentralized-oracle-networks-c0a946f1c40
>The fact is that immediately after Chainlink started shilling in the first half of 2018
Chainlink didn't start shilling in the first half of 2018 retard. ICO was in Q3 of 2017, the team went radio silent until mainnet in mid-2019 which was then followed by the Google pump. The token pumped a bit near the end of 2020, but then the dumps started, and by the 1st Jan 2021 Link was already down to rank 10 and heading lower.

>>52310503
chanlink will hit a 1000$ end of 2023 retard whatever you say otherwise

>>52311156
>Oh boy, you better not let ChainLinkGod and The_Crypto_Oracle hear that you think they have the wrong definition of TVS?
Hey, I'm going by Chainlink's own tweets and press releases, which talk about "smart contract value" and include VRF, Keepers, ...

I didn't do any kind of deep dive into this, and it really does not matter in our discussion.
If anything, it proves that Sergey is always looking for the biggest possible numbers to throw around in his effort to market his product.

>the team went radio silent until mainnet in mid-2019
The team went radio silent until early 2018, when their Github went public and they started tweeting and blogging relentlessly about their integrations.

>>52311382
>I didn't do any kind of deep dive into this, and it really does not matter in our discussion.
Just admit you were wrong bro, no need to try and dodge.
>The team went radio silent until early 2018, when their Github went public and they started tweeting and blogging relentlessly about their integrations
Relentlessly? They had one integration per month, maybe 2 max. How is that relentless? How many of these "integrations" popped off massively? Streamr, Bodhi, Naka Chain, Katallasos, Mobilum, DSG, STKtoken etc etc. Other than that they announced their attendance at Devcon 4, a couple of hackathons, and probably the highlight of the year being Tom Gonser becoming an advisor.

>>52311644
>Just admit you were wrong
The actual words and images released by Chainlink say I'm right.

In any case, it doesn't matter regarding the point about marketing. If anything, it proves my point that Sergey does his utmost to market his product by actively looking for the biggest numbers to throw around.

>Relentlessly? They had one integration per month, maybe 2 max. How is that relentless?
That's when they started tweeting about virtually every single integration.
And that's also when Link started its 2-year uptrend against the entire market.

>>52305848
im currently working on a book. documenting everything, from all the technological benefits, the lore, the fud, the marines. everything will be in this book, its still untitled though, i've just been working on the story board. it revolves around a character named Jack Wo and the trials and tribulations that he has had holding link, from him swinging and his participation on an anonymous image board.

>samefag thread
Are we just not allowed to shitpost in peace
Why must you shit up the board with your incessant samefagging

>>52311736
>The actual words and images released by Chainlink say I'm right.
Lol I'm sure it made perfect sense to you in your own head anon, however your delusional mind isn't reflective of the real world.
>That's when they started tweeting about virtually every single integration. And that's also when Link started its 2-year uptrend against the entire market.
In early 2018 right, that's when you're saying this all kicked off. The massive marketing and shilling strategy that amounted to a grand total of 3, yes a whole 3, tweets in the first half of 2018! They then followed that up with another 30 tweets in the 2nd half of 2018! Wow 30 tweets, unfortunately most were about events like Devcon and hackathons, but 30 tweets anon! Huge!

>>52312047
>however your delusional mind isn't reflective of the real world
The argument was about you claiming Sergey didn't market enough.
Moving from TVS to even bigger numbers with TVE means Sergey is marketing bigly.

>The massive marketing and shilling strategy that amounted to a grand total of 3, yes a whole 3, tweets in the first half of 2018!
The integrations started coming in the second half, precisely when Link started trending up against the market.

>>52312113
>Moving from TVS to even bigger numbers with TVE means Sergey is marketing bigly.
So just switching to a different metric only because it's bigger than the previous one is good marketing? Sergey should switch to TDL, Total Deluded Value, the aggregate of all the deluded valuations in the heads of Linkies. Imagine the size of that number!
>The team went radio silent until early 2018, when their Github went public and they started tweeting and blogging relentlessly about their integrations.
>The integrations started coming in the second half, precisely when Link started trending up against the market.
Which one is it anon? First half of 2018 or second half? Might want to get your story straight first.

>>52311939
Put me in book

>25pbtid argumentative little prick is incapable of even conceding the tiniest little point and keeps trying to hammer it down
Imagine my shock!

>>52312004
i know what you mean

>>52312376
>So just switching to a different metric only because it's bigger than the previous one is good marketing?
Because it's bigger AND more relevant.

>Which one is it anon? First half of 2018 or second half?
Github first half, hence the end of radio silence.

>>52312654
my ode to you will be Jack posting on that board asking for his post to be capped.

>>52312887
Thank you.

>>52312687
>Passive aggressive micropenis Linkie frothing at the mouth when someone questions his project
Imagine my shock!

>>52312861
>Because it's bigger AND more relevant.
Oh it's more relevant now, how come you didn't say that before? Sounds like you just tacked that on to try and justify the fact that you believe "bigger number = better marketing". Can you explain how TVE is more relevant, and make specific reference to why Chainlink double counts borrowing and swaps in its metric.
>Github first half, hence the end of radio silence.
Ah you're forgetting the Pivotal Tracker though, that was live and public from Nov 2017. If Github is marketing then the pivotal tracker is marketing too!

>>52313143
>Oh it's more relevant now, how come you didn't say that before?
haha what?

>Ah you're forgetting the Pivotal Tracker though, that was live and public from Nov 2017
Pretty sure the Pivotal only went public in early 2018, and looking through the archives confirms this.
They were working in private on both Pivotal and Github before early 2018.

>>52313143
>"If Github is marketing then the pivotal tracker is marketing too!" he said snarkily
It's over Chainlink bros... The fudders won

>>52305621
The current price is irrelevant and the future is really all that matters.
We know that the world is on the brink of implementing various digital currencies, when this happens LINK will begin to soar, all they're trying to do at the moment is shake us out, I ain't shook.

>>52306604
I wish, I'd be on that like stink on shit.
Seems to be around $6.

Just from scanning the board I figured we were sub 15k btc and sub 5 link already. Even if it hits those levels it’ll likely bounce back quickly. Removing cancer from the space hurts in the short term but is bullish long term, just a bunch of chicken littles and greedy bobos that want to make sure their buys get filled.

>>52313937
>Moving from TVS to even bigger numbers with TVE means Sergey is marketing bigly.
This what you said right, moving to bigger numbers is better. Yet we know that's not true, so why didn't you start with saying it's more relevant in the first place, instead of going for the incorrect "bigger is better" approach. Still waiting for you to explain how it's more relevant and describe the issue with double counting.
>Pretty sure the Pivotal only went public in early 2018, and looking through the archives confirms this.
Except it was the github that went public in early 2018 as can be seen from the spike in code frequency at the moment they switched it to open source, the pivotal was available in 2017 since that was where the Jason Parser meme started, as that was one of the implementation tasks in Dec 2017.

>>52313954
It was over for you the moment you entered the thread and decided to type a response, I had won since I was already under your skin.

>>52314481
I skimmed 2 of your comments and knew exactly who you are. It just baffles me that you like to spend your whole day in these threads impersonating a brick wall while at the same obviously getting angry over it. What a peculiar way of self flagellation.

>>52314568
Oooooo you know exactly who I am aye, well, who am I?

Also the autists who keep spamming about marketing just sell your link and kys already do us all a favor

>>52314712
>Oooooo you know exactly who I am aye, well, who am I?
>t. Disgruntled Linkie #4821 who has fixated on a plausible external source for his misfortune and won't shut up about it
Marketing could've been better, it is not the reason your life sucks. Go build something.

>>52314819
I built a house inside your head anon. Living rent free at the moment. Go rage on your discord about it.

Thanks for the laughs, kinda bored now. Happy staking! (if Link survives until then)

>>52314151
>losing 90% of value because the team cant produce a test version of their product is immaterial bro
>i i its da next amazon!!!

You have no shame

>>52314959
>>52314994
The only type of anon so dopamine starved they’d spend all day trying to fud their own investment is a discord tranny, the projection is amusing though.

>>52314568
>no one can criticize their investment unless theres a hidden agenda

Such a lame argument. Thats why you get called a cult. Grow up

>>52314994
>30 posts spread over 8 hours
>Thanks for the laughs, kinda bored now.
Yes anon, bet you have much better things to do today! Don't forget to cope and seethe when you remember you didn't sell the top.

>>52309838
>"Chainlink is proud to announce $catpisstoken will use one VRF call to mint NFT's which it will then try to market scam users"
hahaha, so true lol

>>52314568
idk i'm passing through here and the guy laying it on the lankys was entertaining enough for a read, i have no personal agenda against the poor bastards, sometimes reality is funny

>>52314481
>Yet we know that's not true
Of course it's true.

>the pivotal was available in 2017 since that was where the Jason Parser meme started
People were already calling Link "just a json parser" in October 2017, and the first Jason Parser meme in relation to Link was in November.
I'm pretty sure the Pivotal only went public in early 2018, there's zero mention of any pivotal tracking before that.

Rank 24.... home...

>>52315349
fudders:
>Sergey doesn't shill!

also fudders:
>why does Sergey shill every integration?

>>52315045
I have no fear and will never sell.