/biz/ - Business & Finance

token not needed

>>52203719
But it actually is though. Its just strange.

>>52203704
Just be patient

>>52203704
*Dumps
Every other coin would x2 in a day

The first greatest fud campaign is Chainlink. The second greatest was the vaccine epidemic.

give it time young pikin ;)

>Chainlink is so broke from employee bloat that they're entering cash contests

HAHAHAHAHAHA

>>52203719
/thread

>>52203704
Idk but I've gained some serious grey hairs this year as well as legitimately questioning my sanity. Nothing makes any fucking sense anymore.

>>52203842
Are you actually retarded?

>>52203840
Just another 5 years guys and we might hit double digits. Of course our sats/gwei charts will forever be icp tier.

>>52203842
The HR roasties need their Christmas bonuses, please understand.

>>52203719
/thread

>>52203704
Participating in a hackathon that is open to the public does not mean that anyone serious is using your project. Or, more succinctly, >>52203719

>>52203868
Is that what you ask yourself before buying LINK reese's peanut butter tokens?

>>52203852
>>52203915
How to Tell if the Chainlink Token is Needed

Step 1:
Evaluate if Chainlink nodes are performing services for clients, Y/N. If "yes", then the only token that Chainlink's network allows them to be paid in is LINK, meaning that the clients serviced must provide payment in the form of the LINK token for the services in question. Congratulations, you now understand LINK. If you have contentions with this or are merely curious, proceed to Step 2.

Step 2:
Not a necessary step. If you have a problem with Step 1, this is where you come to have a meltdown. Apparently, if you have come to this step on the pretense of contentions with Step 1, you cannot leave; you remain stuck in Step 2 for the apparent remainder of your life while everyone who understood and accepted Step 1 either bought LINK and became prospective of LINK's exciting opportunities across all platforms utilizing or relating to distributed ledger technology, or didn't and moved on. You may think that Chainlink's network could, in theory, simply accept other forms of payment than LINK, and you are entitled to this opinion—however, it is not how things work, and to say that this could be the case is as speculative as saying that Ethereum miners could, theoretically, if only it were coded and introduced into Ethereum's protocol, accept payment in the form of some other blockchain's native currency. For anyone stuck in Step 2, it is apparently incomprehensible that this will not come to pass; seeing any evidence that the LINK token is, in fact, already very firmly embedded into Chainlink's routine operations allows the subject to stay fresh in their minds. The ongoing success of the Chainlink network likely ensures that they will remain stuck on the matter for as long as they live.

>>52203889
Icp has never been 13x though

>>52203795
i accept that they dont want me to own LINK
their efforts wont stop me

sirgay going to betray us all again and dump link to raise funds for a fucking contest

Its simple really. Over 100,000 wallets hold over 1k LINK. No way in hell the world can handle that many new millionaires at once. God wont allow it.

>>52203704
>web3 buzzword that means nothing
if chainlink service was needed they could ask for fees paid in ETH or stables, the fact is they dont have nowhere near a finished product and never will

>>52203973
kek i love this pasta and how linkies think that other blockchains talking to chainlink contracts deployed on their very own chain should pay in some super volatile token. it's like opening a shop in the USA and demanding customers to pay in rupees.
chainlinks token will by definition never be needed since chainlink is never supposed to be a blockchain that runs native contracts.

>>52204604
That’s not how it works though. Before we would reach $100, something like 90% of wallets would already have sold let alone at $500

>>52203719
Fpbp

>>52204604
Real estate created a couple standard deviations more millionaires over the past 2 years. Many smart enough to put that capital to work. 100,000 people having 100-500K USD in accessible funds means nothing in 2022. A minority of them having 10K+ LINK means even less.

>>52205367
I can't believe you had to explain that. The Link cult really attracts some bright folks eh. And just a PSA to you idiots, there is no grand conspiracy amongst world leaders holding down your little token. They don't give a fuck about a bunch of buzzwords and TVL graphics...

So many cryptos with losers just like you have done 1000x, you aren't special, and if you ever do come into a few million, literally no one is worried about your pussy ass doing shit. Hilarious that a bunch of NEETs that can't even bench their own weight think they're gonna become some kind of formidable force because they can now afford a decent house. HAHHAHA holy shit the delusion.

>>52203994
I'm just saying how the chart just flatlined and hits a new atl every other week. That's what my fucking sats chart looks like with link.

>>52203704
Did you hear the news? XRP Flare is in partnership with Google to release an oracle network with all major tech companies and also partnership with JP Morgan to get the tech into all of finance. We won, linktards have lost.

>>52206019
seethe

>>52203719
Yep pretty much, not realizing this is how i got fucked out of lifechanging money

>>52203719
>https://docs.chain.link/docs/data-feeds/price-feeds/#solidity
>mfw he's right

>>52206072
If you’re a nulinker faggot you have no position to talk about waiting 5 more years

>>52203704
Because I own it. It can never moon. I'll never sell though unless someone wants to buy mine for some ungodly amount to end the curse.

>>52204797
>super volatile

Its so stable it literally prevents the whole market from pumping

>>52203842
Sergey has been seen knocking on car windows at traffic lights asking if people want guntjobs for $20

>>52203704
wagmi

>>52203704
> token not needed
and
> incredibly centralized oracles

>>52206885
kek

>>52205367
Ok dipshit. Where do those tokens go?

>>52208305
>centralized oracles
Wasn't this a selling point for Binance's oracle?

Bros, is Chainlink worth buying or have I missed the boat? 100 billion tokens is a lot.

>>52203704
Deutsche Telekom is a dying globohomo shitcorp the likes of Deutsche Bank and others. This is beyond bearish.

>>52208605
Good time to buy anything that'll still exist in 3 years anon

>>52203719
FPBP

>>52208605
It won't x100 but it will X5-10 next bull run.

>>52206072
>That's what my fucking sats chart looks like
So you're a newfag and a topbuyer. Spare me your opinion.

>>52204797
18 decimals, retard

serious question... are you people seriously stressing and sperging out about all the price action and stuff? I just buy and forget and occasionally buy more. I dont care if its 25$ or 2$ because im waiting for the eventual pump. do none of you just buy your tokens and plan to hold for years? seems like all this omfg the price the price is coming from people that want it up so they can sell off. idk I just dont get this manic panic over its price movement when its going to eventually deliver. and if it doesnt I guess I just dont care cuz ive been also investing in other tokens and investments for years so I dont have to rely on JUST chainlink. you guys didnt actually unironically put all your eggs in one basket right? I seriously hope you people are all just playing some massive discord joke pretending to be upset over these prices and all the stress and grey hair and hemoids and relationships you killed over it are just troll posts. I cant think you people are actually sperging out over this shit

>>52203719
based

FUCK linkies

>>52203842
>>52203927
>>52204573
Chainlink is organizing this contest with Deutsche Telekom, retards.

>>52203704
the grassroots punk ethereum community said no
pic related

>>52204748
vitalik and sybil said this wont work.

>chainlink hovering around $8 for a month
how did sergey know?

>>52205895
black pill inbound: being a millionaire today is meaningless. aim higher

>>52209906
big if large

>>52209428
most people who bought in early are trying to escape the rat race

>>52203704
whoever is suppressing the price should be beaten down, seriously
this is beyond ridiculous

>>52209988
surprising there is no one incel enough to act on this information from the chainlink community. come on glowies activate us. we know what to do. rise up fellow incels

As an official incel from the internet I demand action. This price suppression from the grassroots punk Ethereum community shall not stand!

Mark my words I will have vengeance!

Incels, engage FULL INCEL MODE now!

>>52203719
exactly.

>>52209428
>duuuude just lose all your money

This is your brain in a cult

>>52210150
Rise up fellow incel take action you know you want to. I cant and I wont stop you from taking action. be a real man. do it.
this is financial advice

>>52210150
why do you care so much what others invest into? I even said I am invested in more than one token. Did you read that or did you just see words and type out a shitpost? nothing I said implied im in some cult just a fellow investor hoping for a payout. stop writing made up narrative in your head and posting it as fact you fucking peasant class.

>>52210269
The duuuuuude poster is clinically retarded

>>52210269
You need to join the cult fren come on you'll feel so much better

>>52203737
we are on the cusp of WW3. niw i spend my days listening to frontline reports and stacking food. would have been nice to enjoy the last days not working my fingers to the bone, but here we are.

>>52204604
actually only around 20k wallets hold over 1k link

https://ethplorer.io/address/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca#tab=tab-holders&pageTab=holders&pageSize=100&holders=210

>>52203704
Same as a few other coins with huge partnerships and no price action. We will have our day though anon. Biz will be dead but very fun that day.

we'll be coming home soon anons

>>52203704
Most people in the market do not care about this shit at all, and the ones who do care, already knew about it well in advance and have bought accordingly. It’s literally the definition of priced in.

>>52210269
>duuuuuude you cant comment on my investment if youre not in le cult
>duuuuude i i its not a cult!!!! But seriously, stop criticizing my cult or Ill have to downvote

>>52210284
Says the guy trying to pump a dead -90% scam

>>52211958
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/Duuuuude/
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/Duuuuuude/
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/Duuuuuuude/
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/Duuuuuuuude/
Kek you literally have no life

>>52212118
Yeah, I'm sure your life is so much richer hyping up this chudcoin. You're going to make it any day now!

>>52212175
Can you point to where i did that

>>52212273
If you're spending enough time in LINK threads that you start thinking you're recognizing posters (you probably aren't, "duuuude" is a common expression), then you are obsessed. Why don't you focus your energy on getting a partner and fixing your life rather than spending all your energy defending some obscure cryptocurrency on /biz/ and being racist on /pol/?

>>52212300
I’ve never posted on pol, i have a partner, i own a house, i have a good job, and a lot of link too. Naturally, i enjoy reading about my investment on the one place on the internet that seriously discusses it, or used to. The duuuude poster appeared relatively recently. Go fuck yourself, retard.

>>52212402
Cope and seethe, linkchud

>>52203737
>5 years later
LOL JUST TWO MORE WEEKS!!!!

>>52212118
Hahahahahaha. Guy keeps a running log of random forum posts. Nice “having a life” there broooooo. Fucking loser, nice projection. It takes ten seconds to make a post on here.

>>52212402
>partner
Wtf does that mean

>>52212469
Haha malding

>>52212604
Oh he changed ID for the 3rd time

>>52212642
it means he's a faggot

>>52212988
He holds LINK so that was obvious

Who is selling at these prices? Nobody in their right mind should be selling at these prices.

Seriously, who????

>>52210031
The jew.

>>52210571
So you mean to tell me they are going to let 20k become millionares for no reason?

>>52214125
In the grand scheme of things, 1 million isn't that much money.

I didn't think I could become more demoralized

>>52215134
Someone is actively doing this shit specifically to spite Link, you can't convince me otherwise.

>>52203795
> blah blah blah
> fud fud fud
> ...but whatever you do don't think it's BULGARIANS behind this post!!
> hahaha you and your BULGARIANS
> Because we're not BULGARIANS, or anything, if that's what you thought hahaha
In all my years on the chans I have never seen any obvious group of shills so rattled by being called out. Come on, Krasimir, you are fooling nobody, everybody know you are Bulgarian, and you are dragging shame over the proud, Romani people. You guys were Kangz, you know. Gypsy kangz, but still!

Yes, but not until all the "millionaire" boomers lose it all when the housing market crashes, we are simply taking their place. 20 thousand millionaires when millions of people lose everything isn't going to be much.

>>52203731
Ok so when is the last time you used your link tokens?

>>52209428
Yes who cares about waiting for 5 years and only ending up with 7$ right

>>52215134
Unreal. Just absolutely unreal

>>52208539
Where all other value goes during a run up, straight to Israel

Its the jews you fucking idiots, they killed 2 billion dollar franchise and a money maker just because of one tweet, what the fuck you think they gonna do about potential thousands of new millionaire antisemites? Youre seeing it now, they have unlimited money to short link

>>52215267
Have you ever noticed how repetitive the fud is? How it's, you know, kinda the opposite of innovative?

>>52215174
The right chart is being manipulated by the major holders who have inside information, the left is not. It's that simple. Though it looks like you can profit way more on a pump and dump chart, it's pretty fucking hard during a bear market.

>>52215498
Also, mostly opposite of the truth. It's lazy and silly fud desu. Can only fool the uninformed.

>>52215506
Link had the biggest pump and dump out of all alts pretty much.
You literally cannot be elitist about Link's price action, it simply looks like a scam that publicly exited.

>>52208598
The selling point for those was that you don't need another token because of the centralization. Link oracles are centralized, but need another token. That's worse.

Helo sers am og link marine 2017 big stack many link coins.
Token not needed sers.
Am will not stake never sers.
Coin is bad down 9x vs ethrieum sers.
Sergei is big fat man eat big mac sers.
Only 3% apy sers.
Bad coin evil wef illinunimatti sers.
If you not fud like me you are chainlink labs employee shiller sers.
Am dont care about your shitcoin bagholder sers.
Fake googel blog and eric schidmt sers chainlink labs paid them for advertisting sers.
Am not bulgarian sers why the blind angry at nexo?

>>52203704
Link holders are absolutely delusional.

Link is the perfect normie coin. It's got a cool logo, it's $7/coin, and "muh oracles" is just technically sophisticated enough for normies to understand but too sophisticated for normies to dive deep enough to realize Link just isn't needed.

If smart contracts actually start being used in the real world (no, making ERC-20 scamcoins doesn't count) then some will require Oracles. But an Oracle is just a JSON parser with some voting mechanisms baked in. It's not something you need BILLIONS of dollars and YEARS to develop. It's not something you need "partnerships" for. You sit down, write the code, and you're done. Chainlink isn't in the Oracle business. They're a branding machine. Their sole objective is pumping the price of their asset, Link. An asset, by the way, they own 60% of. Yes, 60%.

When the time comes Oracles will be written on the native platform (probably Ethereum) and they'll use the native token (Ether). No one is going to need Link, no one is going to buy Link. Nobody will care. This project, along with all the other fad-projects will fade into obscurity. I won't speculate on price, this entire market is an irrational frenzy. Perhaps there is still room to grow, more money to be made. Just know you stand on 0 fundamentals and in the end fundamentals will prevail.

>>52215536
Private PnDs don't happen over the timescale of years, and usually not even more than a month. Link saw macro price movement mostly in line with the rest of the market, with the largest spike on the btc chart happening back when it was trading between $8 and $20 in the 2020 summer, when everything was fucking crazy.

>>52215583
I wrote this pasta years ago

>>52215593
>Link saw macro price movement mostly in line with the rest of the market
Link has been eating shit compared to the rest of the market since September 2020.
The price action since then makes it look like a literal scam that got abandoned.

>>52215603
based contributoor. i think my greatest contribution to /biz/ was the jason parser meme. if anyone has access to an archive and wants to verify, basically i made a "my dad works with Jason Parser" joke and it got no replies, so I tried it again a week or so later, it got about 3 people laughing at it, then it found its own legs from there.

>>52215637
Nice.

In a drunken stupor i also started and heavily spammed the what language do you speak at home reply to badly written fud. I kept that going for days. For some reason, I enjoyed that one more.

>>52215603
>>52215637
>haha fud funny haha
>WTF PRICE GO DOWN?? WHY????

>>52215629
It went down 70% vs BTC, just like other well known scams such as LTC (-80%) and XMR (-75%).
Only a few actually kept up with the meteoric rise of BTC and ETH.

>>52209428
They are all kids or retards. I invested 1k to chainlink in 2017 and diversified later. If chainlink price 2x and gives 5% apy it would give me nice passive income already. And I wouldn't quit working even I got 10m.

>>52215655
Tongue in cheek Jason Parser memes are completely different to 2020+ paid ESL seethefud.

>>52206473
>100 words on an Malaysian knitting forum
Or
>You losing 90% of your net worth
Yeah I'm sure you're the calm one here lmao

>>52215657
During the past 2 years, Chainlink was THE most bullish crypto in existence, by far.
Yet its price action looks like a scam that got abandoned two years ago.

This is not about "slow but steady wins the race" or "at least we avoid PnDs", it's about systematic attempts to destroy the project.

>>52215689
In the end there's no difference, it's all negativity at this point.

>>52215698
I would be very surprised if any of the people who were laughing about memes back then are actually involved in the fud any more. The fud has a very sort of industrial, impersonal, call center energy to it these days. I mean I'm sure there are a couple of retards still fudding but it would be, like, a handful.

>>52215710
You'd be surprised. There are people unironically posting HR roastie fud all the time.

>>52215752
He's saying that those people aren't the same that did it back in 2017-2019. Nulinkers and the Twitter crowd are a plague and I can fully understand anyone that hates linkies based on interacting with those morons.

>>52215774
>He's saying that those people aren't the same that did it back in 2017-2019.
I know, and I'm saying it does not matter at this point. Negativity is negativity.

It's all fun and games in the early beginning since not many people are paying attention anyway, but at this point it's genuinely harmful to add to the overwhelming chorus of negativity already emanating from malicious actors.
Not to mention it's retarded at this point to do anything even remotely hinting at keeping away new money.

>>52209428
Heh. No certainly not me lol. Imagine going all in on a single speculative asset. You'd have to be crazy. Or unfathomably based. I know I sure wouldn't want a large chunk of the infrastructure that will power Web 3. Not me sir.

>>52215788
Of course it doesn't matter now and I agree with your other point. I stopped the meme fud around 2019 and urged others on every platform to start shilling instead, but people just kept spewing bullshit that became less and less funny and just obnoxious.

>>52203704
Because currently noone is willing to pay $500 for a token. Hopefully at some point people will buy it for $500 because they need it, not just for ponzi speculation.

>>52212604
It took me less than 5 minutes to search the archives to see that you have been posting non stop about link for weeks now. Loser. And i used the word partner because that’s the word the person i replied to used. Obviously it’s my girlfriend. Kek you “people” are so pathetic

Im never selling

$81k 2026

>>52215710
The early fud was just funny. Designed to be just about believable to keep Twitter and Reddit away but hilarious after a quick bit of research.

Now the fud is just bitter. This thread has plenty of examples.

Inb4
>Price action bad
>Missed bullrun
>Etc etc

>>52215710
Its paid jeets and romanians shilling now

>>52216164
Stuff that included a clear wink to the audience, like Chad O'Fork, was great.

No one would even worry about the fud if Chainlink actually delivered what they were supposed to. 5+ years just to release a testnet version of staking? Absolute dogshit.

>JASON PARSER

>>52215809
Absolutely; at this point after two years of brutal price action the contrarian thing to do is to shill Chainlink to the same satiric degree as it was fudded in the early days.
But actual fudders don't want to be contrarian, they just want to hate on Link and see it fail.

>>52215818
Now apply that logic to BTC, you complete moron.

>>52216225
Also Jason Parsers shadowfork,

Price of a coffee cup

Old FUD was soulful and kino

>>52216248
After two years of brutal price action, it's time to apply that creativity to over-the-top shilling instead.

>>52203704
Calm your balls boyos, inasmuch as I need that massive price pamp but then the market instability makes it kinda hard but then hodling is paramount and ama do just that. As I also save say 60% of my hodling in Sylo smart wallet alongside Tezos and ETH and the rest of LINK be all in on staking on CEXs.

It's just not. why is bitdao still under-valued? So many questions we will never have answers to.

>>52214125
I guess you're trolling but 20 thousand people is laughably small. Its 4% of the population of Ireland, which is the 124th biggest country in the world. Its a quarter of our biggest stadium full.

>>52215134
Even if it isn't a conspiracy, why does the most demoralizing shit possible always happen to Chainlink?

>>52216401
Why anon, whatever do you mean?

>>52214125
>for no reason
For holding 1k LINK, that's a reason

>>52216414
That's precisely what I mean. Assuming there is no grand plan to suppress LINK and demoralize its holders. It would have such unfortunate timing that it would be hard to believe

>>52216436
I'd love to see some kind of statistical analysis for the likelihood of this shit happening for 99% of all Link news.

>>52215651
Based board shitter. I started the interlinked meme, I am mentally devastated meme, sibos toilet meme, steve posting, mom demands rent and I have x link meme and bunch of others

>>52216499
Love most of your memes, rent one is a classic for sure

>>52203731
no need for token

>>52216590
Tell it to Vitalik.

>$300
>$500
kek

>>52216499
>>52216287

>>52216287
I have been doing some basic shilling on Reddit recently, started before smartcon.

With the news link has had recently; Schmidt, dtcc, bny, swift. It's more about making it easy to understand.

Market is stil controlled by millions of users and their 100usd a month.

>>52215698
>Yet its price action looks like a scam that got abandoned two years ago


Do you know why this is the case? Have you made an effort to know why it was abandoned? I mean, most folks here know the truth, and it's unarguably true. I'm not trying to fud; in fact, I'm still holding, and it's one of the best oracles. I give it credit. Regarding data service, I will count on Ocean and Geeq. L1 chain, I will count eth, sol, and dot so on. I have fav in every aspect. Let's just hope for the best possible outcome from this point on as the dwindling market keeps fading.

>>52216931
Be gone currynigger

>>52209428
shut up chud. you will NEVER be a woman

>>52216879
>Market is stil controlled by millions of users and their 100usd a month


Precisely, whales. The space is just full of manipulation. Take a look at the 750m short squeeze liquidation. The highest ever in 4 hours. These are all manipulations. The truth is that everyone can't be smart. That's the ballgame. There must be someone at the receiving end.

>>52209927
>>52204604
there's literal millions of millionaires in the world

even if LINK hit $1000 overnight absolutely nothing would change. you are not important. learn some humility.

>>52216879
>Market is stil controlled by millions of users and their 100usd a month.
Exactly.
Not to mention people like Elon who pick up on shit they want to talk and meme about from places like twitter, reddit, etc.

>>52216931
I'm 100% convinced that most of Link's shit price action is because of all the negativity across all social platforms.

>>52214125
>>52204604
why do you think they are fudding so hard?
it's like financial natural selection. only the toughest will survive

>>52216947
Be gone, redditor, maron. What do you think, you shitposter? Maybe a bot

>>52212118
topkek, the more u's he types the more angry and raging his posts get. The $8 question: is he paid to post this or just a mentally challenged angry retard?

>>52216978
The more regular low-value investors are involved, the less of a say whales have.
Keeping out "muh normies" is begging for whale manipulation.

>>52217013
>>What do you think you know shit poster?*

>>52212118
Lmfao duuude poster BTFO

>>52203704
>partnership announcements with extremely mid German companies

That's straight out of the IOTA playbook. Whatever happened to that absolute shitcoin? Same fate probably awaits Linkies.

>>52217136
>Deutsche Telekom
>"extremely mid"
Not even remotely usable, even as satire.

>Iota
Except Deutsche Telekom is literally running a Chainlink node right now, you can check for yourself.
Iota never got anything close to that, just some showcases at trade fairs years ago when major companies did a lot of similar things.

>>52216994
>I'm 100% convinced that most of Link's shit price action is because of all the negativity across all social platforms.


Kek
Despite the negativity, the number of users keeps soaring. My major concern is: why is it not correlated with the price?

Or could it be a false record, or what?

>>52217136
>Mid
Zoomer begone, fr fr no cap

>>52216994
>I'm 100% convinced that most of Link's shit price action is because of all the negativity across all social platforms.
WTF? You seriously believe that a few "Buglarians" have the power to absolutely control the price of the LINK token? Not the fact that a team who based their whole identity on delivering fundamentals (a.k.a no hype) hasn't actually delivered on the fundamental feature that attaches network value to token price. Stop blaming mystical "Bulgarians" for Link's shit price action, and start blaming the team instead. 5 years, 500+ employees, $2.5b in funding, and yet they can't even get out a testnet for their main value capture feature. Absolute fucking failure and a shambles of priorities.

>>52217061
That's not possible because the normies are skeptical about the space now, and they allow whales to move prices in the direction they want.

>>52216792
No thanks
I have 40k link and thus, link is never going beyond $25 ever again since that would make me a millionaire again. Universe doesn't allow it

>>52217175
Replace "Deutsche Telekom" with "Bosch" and you literally sound like a IOTA fanboy from ca. 2018.

>>52217204
>Haven't delivered
Staking starts next month. You know this, yet still act as though you didn't. We all know you hold Link and that's why you're in the thread. Question is, why the fud?

>>52217347
>Staking starts next month
A.k.a they haven't delivered it yet. So my statement was 100% accurate and factual. Why don't you hold the team accountable?

>>52217013
I will call out any currynigger that tries to engage in sincere sounding discussion while shilling his scams (Geeq)

>>52217448
>Why don't you hold the team accountable?
Because I'm not a complete moron like you are

>>52217448
Accountable for what? I don't own shares of Chainlink. I own a stack of utility tokens, hoping that the network will be a success. What gave you the impression you had some sort of say in a company you are not employed or own a share of?

>>52217912
*employed by

>>52217448
>A.k.a they haven't delivered it yet.
>Why don't you hold the team accountable?
It's all about time preference. Also lmao @ thinking buying a token places you in any kind of position to hold anyone or anything accountable. You pretty much have 4 options as a crypto "investor": hold and be patient, hold and seethe, sell and stop caring, sell and seethe. To each their own I guess.

>>52217185
>Despite the negativity, the number of users keeps soaring.
Yes, because Chainlink is simply what is needed.

>why is it not correlated with the price?
Because of all the negativity across all social platforms.

>>52217204
>You seriously believe that a few "Buglarians" have the power to absolutely control the price of the LINK token?
Not "a few Bulgarians", literally all of the fud across all platforms for years.

>>52217208
Normies are still in full control of the space, look at Doge, QNT, XRP, ...

>>52217279
You're ignoring the power of memetics.

>>52217302
When did Bosch ever actually adopt Iota like Deutsche Telekom adopted Chainlink?
Also, when has Bosch last associated itself with Iota, like Deutsche Telekom is doing now with Chainlink (in addition to running nodes for the last two years without interruption)?
Also, there's Associated Press, Accuweather, Swisscom, ... on top of that.
Not to mention Swift.

Chainlink has actual adoption, Iota never did.
Chainlink not only has much more and broader partnerships than Iota, they also run much deeper.

>>52217204
>hasn't actually delivered on the fundamental feature that attaches network value to token price
How is the bitcoin network value attached to the coin price? Or ETH, XRP, ADA, QNT, ...?

Bitcoin + Whale Bots following the Powell and Musk narratives

>>52217866
>>52217912
Lol so mad you had to reply twice.
What utility have you used your Link tokens for so far? Can't stake them yet so no utility there. Sounds like cuck behaviour to me, paying people for a product and then being too weak to even ask why they're taking forever to deliver it. Why are you so scared of calling the team out for not delivering? Lets everyone know that you're just a beta bitch. Imagine letting a pussy like Sergey walk all over you.

>>52218115
And you screeching on an anonymous imageboard makes you not a cuck? If anything it makes you a cuck with high blood pressure.

>>52218115
Go back

If holding Link tokens meant you could hold Chainlink accountable for your profits/income then that would imply the Link token was a security. There seems to be no evidence for this that I can see, and anyone who has some evidence should perhaps contact Gary Gensler and get a little pat on the head for your help.

>>52204604
>god
I am Your god
And I will allow it

>>52215267
embarrassed for you, especially considering there's no helping you. Too far gone...

>>52215498
>duuuuuude everyone is in le conspiracy against our le segret investmant!!1111

>>52218115
Imagine being such a shit human being you'd try to trick people into selling their Link stacks. That's what you do, at no benefit to yourself, other than some twisted sense of achievement. You're basically a cunt, and it's just a shame there are so many like you roaming the world.

>>52216164
>the fud is just bitter

The "fud" you're referring to is just people discussing the reality of what's happening. Wake up you sheep

>>52218133
>>52218135
Damn look at you, rushing in to defend a beta bitch. Have I offended someone important on your discord, so much so that you feel the need to rush in and protect their honour? You simps are pathetic

>>52206652
>>52209380
I bought in 2018, it spiked up in sats, crashed down, and now it's going to flatline like the icp chart. What the fuck is so hard to understand about that.

>>52218219
Why do fudders talk so… weird? It’s borderline uncanny valley.

>>52218138
Well if Link price stays low then staking fails as a security system. So yes, Chainlink is accountable for my profits because if staking fails then Chainlink fails. Congrats, you're just arguing for the failure of the project you support.

>>52217032
>mommmm i'm destroying le fudderz!!!!!
>mommy I'll have my usual PB&J with the crust cut off for lunch

>>52218231
No one believes you

>>52218219
>>52218234
>4 options:
>hold and be patient
>hold and seethe
>sell and stop caring
>sell and seethe
You are either option 2 or 4. So I'm left wondering, why would you sell and seethe? Alternatively, why would you hold Chainlink and "hold the team accountable" by endlessly bickering with anons on 4channel.org? The only logical conclusion from either of these two scenarios is that you have no life.

>>52217937
>duuuuuuude you HAVE to get scammed and like it!!!!

The Link cultie folks. Fascinating the level of absolutely cuckoldry

>>52218286
If Sergey and the chainlink labs are scammers then they are the worst scammers in history of mankind lmao.

>>52218248
You guys are gay as shit. My wallet rank is like 5k something.

>>52218244
>>52218286
Another "hold & seethe about it" anon. You really have so little other drives in your life that you spend your team posting "duuuuude" in LINK threads ad nauseum and being butt mad 24/7?

>>52218286
I love holding link because it makes 3rd worlders like you seethe to no end. Rent free

>>52218314
time*

>>52217618
I'm not startled by your low IQ. It's obvious that it is inherent in you, Maron. I'm holding those bags I mentioned, including Ocean, Fet, Ren, and many others, and I see nothing wrong with voicing my thoughts and concerns about any project.

Mind you, my stack of link surpasses what you think you have. I'm among the early birds that bought and sold at some point, and I'm buying with an average price of 13 dolls.

I don't get it. I think many coins are dogshit, like XRP, matic, kleros and more. But I don't go around fudding them because I simply don't care. I have no vested interest in them so I'm not going to waste any time on them.

It begs the question, who would relentlessly fud chainlink for several years now? People wouldn't do it for free, it doesn't make sense for a rational person to do so.

>>52217969
>Yes, because Chainlink is simply what is needed

Well, let's see what the future holds for it cause I'm positive about it and the L0 solution with an innovative data management solution. Many cricket here might find the projection offensive, but that's it. If they can't get in, they should fuck off.


>Normies are still in full control of the space, look at Doge, QNT, XRP

What is "whale" in your context? Is it those that hold 3/10 of a particular project or 1/1000 of BTC? We are just following their print. Those who miss path lose.

>>52218460
every shitcoin gets trashed here, xrp, xmr, btc, eth, ada, icp, matic you name it
matic is currently pumping hard yet people still shit on it rn, go check the polygon threads
this argument always sounded stupid af to me

>>52218460
I honestly think the last wave of fudders are just retarded nulinkers buying the top.

>>52218460
This place warps minds
People come here desperate to make money after being pol or b tards first
Since they lack a financial education, they latch onto the most shilled project with the best memes
When they realize they’ve been duped they turn on the group but since they were shut in losers to begin with, they don’t act rationally and just move on
Plus, the hold some tiny amount of link themselves and fantasize both about the price exploding so they’re rich and the price dumping so that other people get wrecked and they can buy more
It isn’t rational, it’s sociopathic.

>>52218560
There are retards fudding every project but you can’t compare the amount of useless fud that plagues every link thread. Even now, most link threads are fud.

>>52218189
>Link falls from $52 to $5
>"Why are you trying to trick people to sell"
Holy fuck you have zero shame, literally defrauding people for 90% of their investment. Really hope you didn't shill Link to anyone in person, basically a death wish

>>52218593
But I bought under a dollar.

>>52218280
Anon, why would you immediately rush to 4channel.org to defend someone from your discord who is too pussy to ask the Chainlink team why they're so slow to deliver? Did they ping you requesting your help? Did you immediately jump online and rush to this thread in order to show your dedication to your discord hero? Did you literally drop everything you were doing to defend their honour on an anonymous image board? Oh yes anon, what a life you have!

>>52218593
Total cunt confirmed.
I've had enough of this odious little shit. I'm out.

>>52203704
>another """partnership"""
>price dumps
eternal pain

>>52218615
Cool, I bought @ $0.19

>>52218583
I insist you check out the rest of the board, and I challenge you to find me a single shitcoin that doesn't get fudded to death
link had the largest community in here, and it is also one of the worst performers of the last 2 years, it makes perfect sense that people grew tired of it

>>52218215
>11 posts
>Absolutely nothing of value said

Bitter. Why?

>>52216241
>testnet version of staking
No such thing.
Unless you want to claim that mainnet was also a "testnet" in May of 2019.

Chainlink delivered its main product (oracle network) a year and a half after the ICO, and look at what it became today.

>>52218816
>I challenge you to find me a single shitcoin that doesn't get fudded to death
Go look at the XRP general. It's all people being extremely positive about their investment.
A few weeks ago after Sibos we also had some Quant vs Link threads, Quanties shill their coin to high heaven.

Yes, every project gets its share of fud, but Chainlink is absolutely unique in the sense that its own holders are fudding it too. Because they were gaslit into thinking it's "funny".

>>52203842
>entering
You mean giving away...

>>52218989
I do not understand why you people try to gaslight so relentlessly
>>52219002
>>52218892
/xsg/ has basically been a fud echo chamber ever since the lawsuit dropped
t. former holder of that absolute shitcoin

>>52218645
Hey, you do you anon. If you need a place to vent just say so. Just don't go around pretending your venting is in any way holding Sergey & Co accountable for whatever you're disgruntled over.

>>52218816
>>52218989
Let me give you a specific illustration:
So a few weeks ago Swift explicitly partnered with Chainlink. This news directly shits all over Quanties and Cripplets

But how do Quanties and Cripplets react?
>SWIFT WORKING WITH QNT/XRP CONFIRMED!!!!!!
Pic related.
Completely delusional, but intensely positive.

Now how did Linkies react?
>hurrr another poc?
>durrr Swift is dying anyway
>hlfrrrrr partnerships are so 2017
>ngmmrrrr normies don't know what Swift is

THIS is why Link has been underperforming for so long now.

>>52218915
>v0.1
>one feed only
>no delegated staking on nodes
>no user fee rewards
>no slashing
>super-liner staking not in-effect
>somehow not a testnet
Mainnet in 2019 was 1.0 so was a proper release. Staking is still in beta phase unfortunately until v1.0, they're just doing a public test phase with v0.1.

>>52219069
Mainnet started with a single feed and three nodes, and no features other than a heartbeat and basic averaging.
Was that a "testnet" too?

>>52219039
>/xsg/ has basically been a fud echo chamber ever since the lawsuit dropped
Scroll through the thread you linked right now.
There are a handful of negative posts, and the rest is all positive.

If you go in there right now and point out to them that the ONLY reason Ripple got fucked by the SEC is because their execs shilled the token price, literally NOBODY will agree with you, and a bunch of them will argue with you until 404.
Meanwhile, say "token not needed" in any Link thread and you'll get half a dozen posts agreeing with you.

Every project gets its share of fud, but Chainlink is absolutely unique in the sense that its own holders are fudding it too.

>>52219066
>Let me give you a specific illustration
I just gave you one and you just ignoted it lol
>>52219114
you are literally grasping at straws, go check the archive for the other generals, or even better yet check out every thread being made about xrpeepee outside of /xsg/, nothing but bitter fud, which again is NORMAL
sentiment follows price action, there's literally no reason for any optimism until it does something, that's how every market works
anyway you can believe what you want, from my pov all of this negativity towards link is absolutely warranted

>>52219039
>>52219114
>say "token not needed" in any Link thread and you'll get half a dozen posts agreeing with you

lel I just checked, and the first post itt is "tnn" and it has 9 people agreeing with him.
And that's just one of the "tnn" posts itt.

>>52219114
Mainnet had all the tools for anyone to spin up a DON, connect to a data feed, and start providing data. All the features for it to work were present, hence "mainnet".
What security does v0.1 provide when there is no slashing? None, so it literally doesn't work as intended, therefore "testnet".

>>52203704
No one is interested in this shitcoin

>>52219187
Just sell then, why are you bitching about it so much?
>>52219196
>No one is interested in this shitcoin
>230 replies
Lol

>>52203704
You’re being dumped on by bigmac man. You’re cucks

>>52219170
>I just gave you one
What?

>>52219170
>you are literally grasping at straws
Go through that thread you posted: >>52219002
and find me fud.
I'll wait.
(shitting on some youtuber doesn't count)

>sentiment follows price action, there's literally no reason for any optimism
And yet cripplets are exceedingly positive.
Which is why XRP moons every time some marginally positive news comes out about the lawsuit.

>>52219218
>You’re being dumped on by bigmac man.
Worked for Solana, Matic, Fantom, Uniswap, ...

>>52219218
You forgot to switch your IP
Rookie mistake

>>52219257

kek I recognize you now, 100+pbtid autist
did cl pay for your pass as well? Lol
>trust me guise only link gets fudded here, much bullish!
your gaslighting attempts won't work on me pleb, like I said I used to hold that pos so I know what I'm talking about
basically every community in crypto has the same mindset, link is literally nothing special and no amount of spam shilling will make anyone change their mind, but keep on shilling anon, you have to get that bonus after all

>>52219187
>All the features for it to work were present
The same exact thing is true for staking.

>What security does v0.1 provide when there is no slashing?
Reputation and alerting, initially.

>>52219303
>trust me guise only link gets fudded here
I said only Link gets fudded by its own holders.

I'll prove it: go through that thread you posted: >>52219002
and find me fud.
I'll wait.

>>52219257
top kek

>>52219069
>super-linear staking not in effect
I keep being told super-linear staking is bad for the token price. Why is it a bad thing it is not in effect?

>>52203704
so sergey pissed away another 600k to get chainlinks name next to tmobile. notice this announcement says nothing about about the companies actually agreeing to use chainlink for anything substantial

>>52219303
Also,
>1 pbtid

You switched IPs when you shouldn't have.
Rookie mistake.

>>52219303
100 pbtid autist is a LINK fudder, see image >>52217194

https://archived.moe/biz/thread/51262173/#51268956
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/51262173/#q51267162

>>52219303
>did cl pay for your pass
That’s so deliciously ironic coming from someone who just swapped IDs

>>52219506
That "hurrrr is Chainlink paying you???" phrase also highlights how he thinks everyone who's positive about Chainlink is somehow being paid by Chainlink.

He's a literal unironic fudder who wants to gaslight you into believing Chainlink isn't actually fudded harder than anything else in crypto.

>>52219372
>The same exact thing is true for staking.
Except it's not since all those features I listed are missing. You can't even stake on a node, so how can a node be punished if it has zero collateral staked against it.
>Reputation and alerting, initially.
Both of which have been available since the very first node was spun up. Nodes have been curating a reputation since their first participation in a DON, and is not something magically brought in with the v0.1 release.
So no extra security is being added with v0.1 over and above what is available today.

>>52219721
>all those features I listed are missing
Mainnet didn't launch with any "features" either.
It was literally one feed and three nodes.

>reputation and reporting have been available since the very first node was spun up
Haha you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

>>52208605
1 billion, r8gytard
pic related

>>52219734
Holy fuck, your mental retardation is off the fucking scale. Spinning up a node is a feature, creating a DON is a feature, connecting to a feed is a feature. Doesn't matter if it happens once, or 10,000 times, it's the same fucking feature. According to your logic, Chainlink has over 1,500 individual "features" now, since you count every feed, every node, and every DON as a separate feature. Absolute fucking idiocy. Do you also count every VRF call as a separate feature too? Did Chainlink add 417k different features this last week for all the VRF calls that were made? If this is the pinnacle of Linkies intelligence it's a fucking low bar. I haven't even got on to the fact that you think nodes don't have a reputation currently. Like reputation is some concept that has never existed before v0.1 comes into effect.

>>52219965
>Spinning up a node is a feature, creating a DON is a feature, connecting to a feed is a feature.
Locking up tokens to support feeds is also a feature, that's what staking is.

>you count every feed, every node, and every DON as a separate feature
No, all the features that were added to mainnet since day 1 are features (OCR, threshold signatures, low-latency feeds, proof of reserve, VRF, etc.)

But do tell me more about how reputation and reporting were already in place on day 1 of mainnet fucking lmao.
And be sure to use run-on sentences, that's always a good look.

>>52220057
and your reddit spacing is a better look? You don't fit in on this board and its obvious you are being paid to post here.

>>52203719
This.
And 60% of the premined tokens are held by the corrupt owner.

>>52220073
Protip: that’s not reddit spacing.

>>52220102
protip: you're a bagholder

>>52217969
>When did Bosch ever actually adopt Iota like Deutsche Telekom adopted Chainlink?

They did "adopt" it in the same way DT are "adopting" Chainlink right now, from the sounds of it: some smart-sounding higher-up from Chainlink probably talked to some not entirely technical higher-up from DT about how blockchain/web3/decentralized-something-something is The Future™ and how you have to Get in Early™ and then said higher-up in DT probably got some bored fresh university hire that took a blockchain 101 course to set up a server somewhere in DT's basement with some vanilla Chainlink node software running on it and that's about it.

Does running such a node benefit DT's core business in any way? No, it's just a trial balloon. That can easily be scrapped if it doesn’t go anywhere (protip: it won't, just like all of IOTA's trial balloon "adoptions"). The only tangible benefit they'll get from it is that someone from marketing gets to write a blurb on DT's website about how they are not just some boring fuddy duddy German telecom company, but no, they're now actually pioneers of our bright internet-of-something-something / Smart Contract™ / Smart Devices™ future.

>>52220057
Locking up tokens to provide collateral TO A NODE to support feeds is a feature. Guess what isn't in v0.1, staking on a node.
>But do tell me more about how reputation and reporting were already in place on day 1 of mainnet fucking lmao
Are you seriously arguing that none of the nodes currently servicing Chainlink feeds have any reputation at all? And that they cannot currently raise an alert against each other if they think one of the nodes is reporting bad data? You've got brain damage anon, literal brain damage.

>>52220180
Holy fucking cope lmao.

Bosch adoptoin of Iota:
>n/a

Deutsche Telekom adoption of Chainlink:
>running literal Chainlink nodes for over 2 years

Wallà

>>52220073
>Reddit spacing is when formatting
No. Reddit spacing is double entering after every line break. Newfag.

>>52220199
>Locking up tokens to provide collateral TO A NODE to support feeds is a feature
Locking up tokens to a pool is a feature too lol. It's the exact same thing, only with a pool in between.
When moving the goalposts goes terribly wrong.

>Are you seriously arguing that none of the nodes currently servicing Chainlink feeds have any reputation at all?
>And that they cannot currently raise an alert against each other if they think one of the nodes is reporting bad data?
You're fucking retarded lmao
This is about systemic reputation and reporting, not fucking emailing each other.

>>52209428
I do the same, just buying along (not only LINK), since the only price that will matter is when my portfolio lets me retire anyways, I'm either at that point or not. dunno about the others, but yes, I personally just shitpost along the desperation of others when I'm bored. its always fun to spread fear on investments of this board in general.

>>52220255
Jesus fuck just say you don't understand staking. Locking up tokens in a pool does nothing unless that pool is then allocated to one or more nodes. You literally have to attach the collateral to the node, otherwise you have no idea what collateral to slash in the event of a bad data report. Fucking absolute basics 101 and you failed it big time. The roadmap even fucking says "node delegation" in v1.0.
>This is about systemic reputation and reporting, not fucking emailing each other.
Oh so now you're agreeing that reputation and alerting does exist but they're just adding a new process to it. Congrats on confirming I was right, maybe time for you to shut your mouth.

>>52220180
>IRLfagt ID
Kek

Binance and FTX are making their own oracle tokens, no one wants to use link anymore.

>>52203719
this
if the token was needed the price would be going up

>>52220399
Why are you still here? Just sell lol

>>52220399
>Locking up tokens in a pool does nothing unless that pool is then allocated to one or more nodes.
... you don't say.

>reputation and alerting does exist
lel via email or discord, sure.

>>52220399
> Locking up tokens in a pool does nothing unless that pool is then allocated to one or more nodes.
That’s quite literally what happens in v0.1

>>52220643
No, v0.1 doesn't attach collateral to nodes since node delegation doesn't come in until v1.0.
Plus v0.1 doesn't actually provide any additional security since slashing isn't enabled, so there is no risk of losing collateral due to bad node performance.

>>52218615
>duuuuuude i i it doesnt bother me that lost a few hundred thousand because my cult said its good. HODL marinesth

>>52218460
>nooooooo you cant spend a few minutes a day talking about le cult
>spends hours each day whining about le fudders

The irony is unbelievable

>>52218915
>the team literally calls it testnet
>duuuuuude i i its not a tesnet

HAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHHA holy shit

>>52220801
>Duuuuude you have to be extremely agitated 24/7 and blame everyone but yourself for not selling the top
Never selling means having to deal with losing paper gains. Trying to sell the top means potentially missing out on paper gains. Pick one or the other and. stop. fucking. seething. and. malding. you. pathetic. cuck.

>>52220831
This is some ridiculously desperate firefighting if it isn’t bait

>>52220801
>>52220831
>>52220853
dude if you feel this bitter just do what any normal red blooded American would do buy a gun. once you have
a gun you earn the power and respect of everyone trust me bro it really works

>>52220831
>a few minutes
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/Duuuuude/
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/Duuuuuude/
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/Duuuuuuude/
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/Duuuuuuuude/

Just face it linkies, you missed the last stop to get off the ride. More and more exchanges are developing their own oracles and link will just become a distant memory. Should have sold long ago. Still a useful project that a lot of other projects use but as time goes on it will be needed less and less. By the time the bull market comes link will truely be token not needed but sneeded.

>>52203731
>But it actually is though

Yeah, it's the only way Sergey can raise funds because Chainlink is certainly not earning anything from Oracle services.

>>52218560
have you actually read a matic thread? its 99% positivity and "stay poor" jeet nonsense. you're either baiting or retarded, don't care which.

band up 135% keke

>premine token with no actual usecase
>shilled by a google faggot kike
VC's dont buy tokens on the open market. They are given vast amounts at a massive discount to dump on actual bagholders. Sir gay has been so aggressively giving away and selling his own premine to anyone who can keep his vaporware project relevant, that it would be impossible for Chainlink to see any serious upward price action.

>>52221284
If you see the entire market as a scam and think crypto is a fad that will never see mainstream adoption then that’s a fair take, but if that’s the case why would you buy it at all if you’re not an insider? Otherwise it’s just literal gambling. And if you have that negative a view of the market, why bother responding to a 280 reply link thread? I think metals are a complete midwit investment trap but you’ll never see me wasting time in /pmg/.

Because the dextools/coinmarketcap/coingecko etc charts say it is in fact not a $500 altcoin? Retard.

>>52216499
I started the taking credit for memes meme, glad you like it

>>52220720
>v0.1 doesn't attach collateral to nodes since node delegation doesn't come in until v1.0
The staking pools in 0.1 literally apply to the ETH/USD feed nodes.
Node delegation refers to third parties choosing specific nodes to stake, rather than a pool.

>v0.1 doesn't actually provide any additional security since slashing isn't enabled
v0.1 provides reputation and reporting.

>>52220944
>>52220963
v0.1 is LITERALLY on mainnet.

>>52221284
>with no actual usecase
see >>52216739
and unironically end your miserable existence.

>>52220944
>>52220963
>>52220853

The market knows its not needed, simple as

>>52222942
lel but the XRP, QNT, fucking Band tokens are needed?

The Link token is literally REQUIRED for every single individual transaction by Chainlink mainnet, which is after ETH the most widely adopted and used crypto network in existence.

>>52222983
its not a question of need it is a question of can I pump hype and dump on a slave class that would not go and buy a gun and hunt these vcs down and gun them down in cold blood.
retail are cowardly slaves that deserve to be dumped on because they never resort to hunting down the few and gunning them down in cold blood. vcs have been doing this for years they know retail are literal retard nigger cattle.
face it we need new tokens.
we need the vcs to seed those new tokens with capital.
and we need them to hype it as the future so that everyone is duped so the whales can unload their seed tokens for a profit.
thats it.
thats all that is needed.

>>52222983
Yeah. Do you know nothing about economics?
Link is not needed because it sells itself as a solution to a problem which doesnt exist.
No normie is out there thinking "god I wish this app was trustless truth, I really wish we had decentralized oracles so I can check the weather with my phone app!"

Also the chainlink project had its foundation built on quicksand from the start. Its not decentralized at all entirely centralized and controlled by sergey, all nodes must submit to sergey, any elite can approach him and tell him that a node providing facts is just misinformation and it will be blacklisted or link will face sanctions. Utterly useless and fucked at the axiom level

>>52223161
blockchains cant talk to each other.
blockchains have no secure access to apis without chainlink.
and all the rest of the feature creep they tweet about.
inb4 the price feeds are not exciting enough dude lmao its a financial space the price is the only thing that matters

>>52223134
Well Chainlink gets massive amounts of hype from massive people and corporations, but the problem is that this hype gets cancelled out by BTC whales.

>>52223161
Chainlink is the second-most widely adopted and used crypto by the crypto industry itself.
If it's a "solution to a problem that doesn't exist", then all of crypto is even moreso.

>>52223205
if btc dominates the market like this then it was never meant to be. there is no future for crypto. no new tokens no hype no mars no space mining. its all a lie.
but your previous image was about the stock market dumping and not btc
>btc and the stonks are correlated bro
and now you can just blame the jews like every other normal person. or the swiss banking elite up to you >>52223205
>If it's a "solution to a problem that doesn't exist", then all of crypto is even moreso
this. burn it all down

>>52216989
You are looking at it in terms of USD. But in my opinion it won’t be viewed that way. If le elite are bringing in some new financial paradigm, which clearly seems to be the case, and everything is re-valued in terms of BTC, or LINK, or gold or whatever… then 1,000 link holders might be the equivalent of someone with 5 billions dollars in this new world. How do you guys not understand that this is what’s happening? I literally bought in 2018 because autists here were saying this would get rid of the middlemen, and white collar paper pushers that cost companies untold billions in dead weight. I was buying into something that was changing the world into a world I won’t know part of. I wasn’t buying to get rich like ETH holders did in the old world. It was more for not ending up in some UBI camp. Sure, I thought maybe it would rocket up to $1,000 while things were still the same and we might have gotten a few years of debauchery in the one world before they brought down the hammer. But then the covid scam hit and now it’s all changed. Everything is fucked. But at least I won’t be eating crickets in some concentration camp with all the former CPA’s and formerly well to do housewives.

>>52223237
>if btc dominates the market like this then it was never meant to be. there is no future for crypto. no new tokens no hype no mars no space mining.
What the fuck are you talking about, tons of cryptos have massive moons against BTC.
All that happens when BTC dumps acutely is everything automatically follows for a brief amount of time due to arbitrage bots.

>your previous image was about the stock market dumping and not btc
I posted no such image itt, but that has indeed happened as well.

>>52223311
See Kek agrees with me.

>>52203860
SAME.
fuck crypto. stocks. society. insiders.

>>52209988
i bet it's sergey himself like others mentioned. along with CZ and SBF and any big names.

>>52223311
>>52223344
Witnessed 1KEOY

>>52203704
did you really think they would allow 3,000~ neet frogposting retards on 4chan to become billionaires? all you faggots need to sell first to disperse your 10k+ stacks down to shit piles to be more easily controlled.

>>52223311
>>52223344

Kek agrees with you twice

>>52203704
you dont need the token. the chainlink network is working right now and staking isnt even developed, thus you dont need the token. chainlink is on the ETH network.

>>52215287
>When was the last time you used your TCP/IP connection?
Imagine thinking like this brainlet that you will "use" your LINK tokens vs the tokens getting used behind the scenes while you just press your little phone buttons like you always do and watch magic happen.

>>52223887
>omgz you guys they wont allow us to get rich oh nooo!!!!1

>>52224150
>LINK is the kind of token that is used behind your back
the betrayal is real bros

>>52215295
it was ~$50 at one point. y'all got greedy.
seethe & cope.

>>52220963

>>52217618
Who the hell are you? You want to fidget over you calling him out? Scallywag

>>52203704
>Tranny Mobile

WELP

>>52223161
I am curious about the 2/23 multisig. That's the most damning FUD I've found.

Old and busted. I'm sorry stinkies. And it's not like stink is flawless. Remember ladyluck coin? lol

>>52224150
So nobody is using them, it's piggyback a congested POS chain, whilst pic related

>>52223887
nobody is buying or using, their devs are entering 600k contests