/biz/ - Business & Finance

man I bought 100 at $1 of these bad boys and forgot about them I'm going to sell them for some LINK

it's useless, the whole board is obsessed with shitlink and will keep ignoring QNT

>>51719322
the real flippening

SCAM, GILBERT IS A SCAMMER. PETS.COM of crypto

>>51719322

>>51719487
Your calculating for BTC in a bear market low friend. 3,5x that to start.

>>51719355
QNT is useless, yes

>>51719487
That would be very nice.

>>51719818
you have to imagine a world in a few years where the cryptocap will be 10-20x what it is now. in that context qnt can easily have the marketcap of btc now in a bear market

what does the token even do

>>51720216
like link, nothing. but it will be considered a better store of value for enterprises than inflating fiat

>>51720216
https://www.lcx.com/what-is-qnt-token-by-quant/

>>51720823
Cool I read that and then wanted to buy some but it seems like that exchange doesn't have enough volume so I looked around for the exchange that offers QNT with the lowest fees and found coinmerto, gonna use that instead.

>>51720881
>buying qnt on a cex
nogga just use uniswap

>>51720881
coinmetro is utter shit. just use kucoin there is no kyc

>>51721135
and pay fees?
>>51721179
>coinmetro is utter shit.
Why? explain in detail

>>51721280
>Why? explain in detail
you have to pass kyc and they dont have a lot of liquidity

>>51721306
I see, well kucoin seems shady and I can't trust them with my money. You have to pay kyc to order food these days so I'm not sure why you're so mad.
I realize you might live in a 3rd world shithole and don't own a passport but most of us don't have this issue.

>>51719355
QNT is actually useless. I hold equal amounts of qnt and link and even though LINK is bad about deadlines, we at least have a tremendous amount to show for it. We can see the feeds. We can see the VRF, keepers, OCR requests. We can trace the activity cross chain. You can see it. You can interact with it.

QNT hasn't shown an iota of proof they are doing literally anything. Community gateways were due a year ago, he said they were late because of covid and brexit A YEAR AGO, now Gilbert won't even address these in telegram and instead just has his mods ban you. They pushed some bullshit update on twitter last month about QRC-721 setting the standard for NFT's, yet you can't find a single NFT that was minted, supported, enhanced, or anything happening using this new "standard".

You can see the difference in the threads that hit /biz/ and the posts on twitter. Link posts you'll see people arguing about the technology at a technical level. QNT posts you'll get esoteric retards talking about things they can't prove, can't show, and then they inevitably fall back on these retarded partnerships that sound official but really aren't (digital pound foundation, anybody?).

Please, show me one single tangible thing that shows things are being built and done? Show me one fucking NFT built using QRC-721. Show me ANYTHING.

You can't because it doesn't exist.

The funniest thing is that tokenomics have clearly changed. The token isn't nearly needed as much as Gilbert implied. They completely removed all tokenomics information from the website (the same website update that was promised 7 months ago to provide MAJOR updates).

The token will be used to buy licenses, that's it. Licenses for what seems to be absolutely nothing.

Bumping and wondering the best way to buy without kyc

>>51721374
Don't buy it then. It's pretty simple. The people that do buy it probably believe in the future of it.

>>51721377
jfc how incompetent can you be??
Any dex on ethereum. as for cex MEXC or w/e

Qnt will never be adopted. It’s one of those coins like xrp who had 10 years and no adoption but pumps becuase muh banks.

>>51722330
Ok, where do I get non-kyc ETH then?

>>51721336
kek kevin, you dont leave money on kucoin, you just send small amounts, trade and cash out to your wallet. imagine wasting time to pass kyc to trade on an exchange with shit liquidity

>>51722304
If QNT bagholders had a string attached to them "well then dont buy it" "why are you here" would be one of their phrases.

They can't possibly have a good-faith conversation and answer questions. Sad.

For what it's worth, im not buying it anymore and haven't for years.

>>51722343
I'll bet you 2 QNT and 10 XRP that both get adoption.

>>51722366
call metamask support ser

>>51721374
qnt is just a gamble that it will become big among institutions. just look at gilbert connections and the partnerships they are building. they aren't trying to impress retail because retail is not their target so they dgaf to explain anything, they are busy securing partnerships at the highest level

>>51722382
I understand what you're saying. It's doing fuck all at the moment. But it's part of the schizo future system, you either believe in it or you don't. Its pointless arguing over it.

>>51722330
ramp.network allows small credit card buys without kyc. like up to 300 usd iirc
moonpay too i think.

>>51722448
>they aren't trying to impress retail because retail

Fundamentally and unequivocally false. Gilbert pushed community gateways on retail all year last year by EOY, dumped a shit ton of QNT, stopped in December, and came in and said it wasn't happening and to stop asking about it (literally).

"they aren't trying to impress retail" is the biggest non-falsifiable cope you can possibly reply with. What a great way to explain literally having nothing to show for bagholding for almost half a decade.

>>51722475
Thankfully ser, you are redeemed.

>>51721374
>we can't see shit!
yeah, it's a closed source project anon
you want proof of adoption? it is beyond a doubt the best performer of the market for 4 years straight
>>51722493
I have a lot of fucking money, it's literally at $130 and my average is $0.30 lmao
>nothing to show for
ironic coming from a shitlink bagholder

>>51722493
who cares about gateways, just let them deal with institutions. companies often have to change plans. you don't just secure a partnership with oracle or central banks without anything to show for it. i believe it will be absolutely massive
>>51722534
>you want proof of adoption?
and importantly, decorelated from other crypto asset

>>51722534
Your reading is as bad as your argument. I've held QNT and LINK for exactly the same amount of time. My average is around yours.

As soon as this has another retard pump over $200 im out for good. Eventually the music will stop and you will get caught holding the hot potato.
>you want proof of adoption? it is beyond a doubt the best performer of the market for 4 years straight

Moonboy shit. You can't address anything I said. Vaporware tokens will moon until they don't. This is news to nobody.

For anyone watching, please keep this in mind. QNT simps can't possibly address anything you bring up because they have no answer for it. They can only insult you and hope you don't pay attention to their lack of substance.

https://quant.network/news/overledger-2-2-12-makes-nfts-easy/

Show me one QRC-721 NFT, moonboy.

>>51722493
Yep. This is my problem with Quant. No tangible metrics. No data. Just a “trust the devs” response every time.

It pumps because of the low token supply and low float so if you’re making money on it congrats.

But fundamentally there is no future with quant. All these “institutions” and “government CBDCs” are going to go with Chainlink and SWIFT, who are creating the standard for interbank / blockchain messaging and transfers. CCIP IS THE OVERLEDGER.

Quant already lost, but there’s still money to be made in a ghost project I guess, as long as you keep up the speculation and “hope for the future” without revealing actual progress

>>51721374
exactly, I tried looking into quant and couldn't find shit

it's baffling that QNT is pumping while Link stagnates after the announcement that swift is potentially using CCIP which simply slurps QNTs entire usecase while it's just 1 of many usecases Link provides, I'm assuming the community simply doesn't understand the ramifications

>>51722372
>you dont leave money on kucoin, you just send small amounts
Poorfag moment. Anyway that's what I said, you don't trust it enough to keep your funds in why would I trust it to even deposit MY funds in

>>51722625
it's simple, it's basically closed-source, they are a company dealing mainly with other companies. they dont need the same level as transparence as link since they aren't catering to defi. you should see qnt like some kind of shares of the company

I feel bad bc i fudded my brother out of it at 50, he saw it one of these onions mouth crypto shill youtube channels ...
Vapour seems obvious but you cares when it pumps :(((

>>51722689
poorfags are actually the one using coinmetro because the lack of liquidity doesn't hurt them (poorfag orders)

>>51719322
it's up 7%

>>51722633
>these “institutions” and “government CBDCs” are going to go with Chainlink and SWIFT,
Disagree. Chain Link and swift will only solve part of the problem. There will still be a need for nostro vostro accounts.

>>51722728
You are confusing volume with liquidity, coinmetro has plenty liquidity and you would know that if you weren't a massive poorfag.

>>51722625
>For anyone watching, please keep this in mind. QNT simps can't possibly address anything you bring up because they have no answer for it. They can only insult you and hope you don't pay attention to their lack of substance.

I don't hold any QNT, but I was curious and went to their telegram to ask questions regarding its usecases and what it does exactly.. I was banned by the admin within 5 minutes. Gluck for those holding and grats to those who've made it, but be careful with this one. I'm not trying to imply that the project isn't legit, but this anon is making some solid points in comparing chainlink to quant.

Usually whenever a project performs this well, you'd assume it's due to some type of significant service that their providing to the ecosystem.. I can't find anything and neither can its supporters. All they've given me is the partnership with siabank whatever that is.

Chances are QNT is just pumping due to a big CT influencer mentioning it;

https://twitter.com/Pentosh1/status/1569317058369789952

>>51722706
>it's simple, it's basically closed-source
The chains they claim to work with aren't. Why can nobody find a single ounce of evidence on any of these chains? Where are the overledger transactions? Where is anything?

They interop with all blockchains, yet nobody is stepping up to prove me wrong.

Do you not find that weird at all?

>>51722738
>coinmetro has plenty liquidity
thx for the laugh retard
>>51722751
>Where are the overledger transactions?
i'm not even sure it will be public. but honestly i dont care. it's just a gamble it will become huge in the future. at the end of the day it's closed-source garbage but i'll sure make money if it pumps

>>51722812
>closed-source garbage
We do agree on this partially. Still, we can't use the "closed-source" excuse when QNT is supposedly interoping with all of these very public, very viewable blockchains.

It doesn't matter how closed source they are, if they are doing transactions cross-chain, we'd see it somewhere.

>>51722812
>thx for the laugh retard
Are you retarded?

This article is unrelated to quant, but it outlines requirements for real usage:
https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/2022/09/21/privacy-enabled-crypto-applications-are-coming-for-enterprise-but-not-overnight/

>>51722864
oracle wouldn't shill interop if quant had nothing to show for it, just my 2 cents

>>51722706
>you should see qnt like some kind of shares of the company
if a Linky said this about their token they would be ruthlessly bombarded with TNN vitriol, for some reason Link is held to a higher standard than any other project

>>51722864
lmao, this is how enterprises operate anon, have fun waiting for DECO
>the music will stop!
>LINK will reverse!
ok, keep drinking the koolaid
this is exactly why QNT is the one; midwits like you get filtered by muh nfts and muh open source
nobody cares about these things, and if they care, they're utilizing it in private dlts
please, sell all of your stack and keep holding shitlink

>>51722924
shitlink brought that to themselves by selling to gullible retards like yourself the "definitive truth" bullshit that exist nowhere

>>51722883
open a qnt chart on cm and just watch the bids and asks. are YOU retarded?

>>51719322
A quantum resistant?

>>51722923
oracle also pushed gravelcoin. the oracle relationship isn't nothing, but its not the "defacto" solution like qnt simps pretend it is. its one solution among many they are playing around with.
>>51722928
not a single attempt to refute anything i said. very nice

You could very easily make me look stupid by posting one of the things I asked for above. You would be the hero of the QNT world. Who knows, maybe your favorite qnt twitter shill will give you free patreon access for his epic bread crumb connections.

>>51723377
i have honestly no idea if they have a product or not but from the hints in their tg i believe they will deliver. gilbert seems like a serious guy with serious connections. i am not emotionally invested in this project like the quamfy retards who think quant is the best crypto project ever, i just have a bag just in case

>>51723377
>You would be the hero of the QNT world
anon, get off your high horse and touch grass, I don't give a dime if you are convinced or not or if I "win" an argument on the internet
all I want is to make money, QNT goes up, I'm happy

>>51719322
>mfw i almost sold my poorfag stack of 4 QNT at $110 a few weeks ago
Phew, almost got priced out.
>>51719487
Guess ill rope if it ever hits 5 figs in a few years

>>51721374
Yeah. What puts me off is a lack of tutorials or any footage of Overledger in operation. If you build a Blockchain operating system you'd put some examples of it in action out there, even if you didn't you'd expect somebody on earth to upload something. How do you sell software licenses without any demonstration of your software in action.

You can tell Quant is legit though by reading through the patents. I guess it is just not a workable state yet.

>>51721374
Imagine if we were deluded enough to all in QNT instead of LINK. Fucking hell

>>51725427
>What puts me off is a lack of tutorials or any footage of Overledger in operation
>I guess it is just not a workable state yet.
or maybe it is and they only show it to potential clients. how it works may not supposed to be public.