/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51706151
But I thought it wouldn't be ready for years and years? Some kind anon with clearly shaky control of the English language informed me that they were struggling to even get it started, but on your link I can clearly see it working on the testnet.
Who do I believe?

>>51706335
Nobody

https://goerli.etherscan.io/address/0x2681f959bECE0e908A330cfd1be1Dd601866991F#code

>>51706151
what test did they showcase? what chains did they involve?

>>51706151
explain this to me like i'm retarded

>>51706485

goerli and rinkeby

>>51706580
atomic swaps, for real this time

>>51706753
what the fuck is an atomic swap

cats are small niggers covered in fur

>>51706888
My cat is so well behaved that she puts any nigger to shame. You've only known nigger cats because they were raised by niggers, spiritual or otherwise.

>>51706888
Without opposable thumbs they are a goofy nuissance that easily contained for amusement, contrary to their brown humanoid counter part

>>51706446
https://rinkeby.etherscan.io/address/0x80aa9e26BddB4d8f2E9CBC46Db3292dbD6b0506E#code

>>51706151
> ccip

>>51706887
I've never heard of it but from the name I can tell you with 99% confidence that it's for swapping tokens on different chains with someone in a way where either the operation goes through on both chains (you both get your swapped tokens), or the operation fails on both chains (you both get your tokens back). Right now since there's no communication between chains it can be left in an inconsistent state where one person got their token but the other didn't, for example.

>>51706887
basically this >>51707065
One of the many pre smart contract era terms, like colored coins or child chains, Ideas that finally come to life after 9 years

>See? See? I pee!
And yet nobody cared

>>51706151

Anon just delete this. Nobody cares about useless, stupid, stinky chainlink (ew)

>>51707161
I care about being able to flip my btc through an atomic swap to xmr.

>>51707253
how exactly do you think you will be able to swap btc to xmr when neither btc nor xmr have smart contracts?

>>51707373
btc wrapped on some chink chain and xmr wrapped on another chinkchain without any kyc or aml involved to get it in a clean account

>>51707429
No one will ever voluntarily give up XMR for BTC's though

>WE WAITED 6 YEARS FOR PONG
it's over

Here's a video of the demo:
https://twitter.com/datos_extremos/status/1575551254629355520

>>51707138
picrel of what happened a bit earlier

>>51706151
>live on test net
>live
>test net
yikes

IT'S
AALLLIIIIIIIVVVVEEEEE

>>51708931
THEY DUMPED 700 MILLIONS PER WEEK AT THE TOP OF THE BULLRUN TO PLAY PONG ON RINKEBY???????????????

>Anti-Fraud Network

Well, I don't think we're gonna see CCIP before staking. 2023 Q1 earliest imo

7.85

>>51708931
Better angle. Thanks

>>51706151
Based cat asserting dominance over its vegan owner.

>>51706151
>turned my back for a minute
>while holding camera facing the cat
Staged.

>>51706580
That animal is a cat and that bowl is full of rice and the cat is urinating in it.

>>51710183
>>51711116

>>51706151
1 cup of long grain rice is enough for 2 people with a little left over. 20 cups is enough for 40 people, what the fuck.

>>51707373
https://unstoppableswap.net/

>>51714005
>americans

>>51706151
>CCIP demo
> it's all on rinkeby

great crosschain capabilities you got there linkies

>>51708931
CCIP is amazing, I can't believe they have the presentation to this guy to demo it

>>51706151
imagine owning untrained pets, absolutely disgusting

>>51715993
t. didn't actually watch it

>>51716009
yes I did, now tell me what other chain was involved here

>>51716021
They literally say in the first seconds of OP's vid, retard.

>>51706151
chinese communist internet peepee

>>51716072
Chainlink was another chain?

who was chain?

>>51716090
Tell me you're joking. Just tell me.

>>51716104
>i am autistic and need to be told someone is joking

>>51706151
>cat ruins food
>owner doesn't get mad
>is calm enough to take a photo of it
>probably finds it cute or some shit
They deserve their pee rice.

>>51716110
Well that other guy definitely wasn't joking, so at a certain point I just have to ask.

>>51716072
no he says this is etherscan on rinkeby, what the hell did you hear maybe I missed it I genuinely would like to know

>>51716119
he was fudding and most likely for the joke of it
I get why you're frustrated tho anon, I'm tired as fuck of all this shit as well

>>51716104
I am a joke to you?

edit. thanks for the gold kind stranger
edit... this might appear under a new IP
edit... fuck niggers

>>51716123
>this is etherscan on rinkeby
And what's this: https://goerli.etherscan.io/address/0x2681f959bECE0e908A330cfd1be1Dd601866991F#code

Now tell me what a nice guy I am for not mixing too much of my cum into that spoonful of information I just fed you.

>>51716149
I can haz pong blockchain now?

>>51716149
how to install two player pong game on blockchain?

>>51716171
>open BSV blockchain in Excel
>copy-paste Pong.exe in line 30, row 2
>???
>benefit

>>51716149
function ccipSend(uint256 destinationChainId, Message memory message) external returns (uint64);

ok this is actually cool thanks (but really cant see or hear anything in the shitty vid in the op)

>>51716179
line #235 start pong game seems broken as the function is set to false so the game wont boot is there a command line hack to get around this?

>>51716201
>line #235
My Excel doesn't scroll that far down, are you sure you're in the right program?

>>51716207
I tried to install it with MS paint but it wont boot :( Do I need to install the blockchain on my Mac?

>>51706151
Just wash the piss out. Just going off the picture I'd say it hasn't had time to be absorbed by the rice yet. It'd be worse if it was cooked rice.

>>51716213
>Do I need to install the blockchain on my Mac?
Only if you actually know your Mac address.

>>51716219
If I tell you my MAC address will you fix the blockchain so I can finally play pong?

>>51716225
Just send me your version of the BSV blockchain, because everyone has a different version.
My contact details are in the PM I just sent.

> +2 years for RC version
> +2 years for stable version
> +4 years for customer adoption
See you at $3 next year

>>51706151
I fucking hate cats

>>51706151
This is what you get when you don't raise your cat and teach it to respect you. You are the dominant cat. It is your territory. You allow them to live there. My cats don't fuck with me and still like me and somewhat fear me when it is appropriate. They are awesome and let me pet their tummies ferociously without them attacking me because they know i'm there to protect and guide them, not to attack them. Yes you can raise and teach a cat many things but most of you are all too beta to achieve this.

>>51716239
lol what happened to my post?

>>51716317
Cats are the niggers of the animal kingdom

>>51706446
>>51707038
so what's it do?

>>51717262
You mean dogs

>>51717301
kys

>>51717301
dogs are to well meaning to be niggers. They are good bois working the field and feeling bad when massa hit them with cane. Cats on the other hand start to rip your crib to shred and piss on your carpet given the chance

>>51717334
>loud
>annoying
>needy, can't be left alone for more than a few hours
>constantly beg for food
>break out into barking fits if someone walks past your house or if it hears a noise in the distance
>dumb as fuck
>smell like shit
>eat their own shit
>eat random objects that aren't even food
>attack people
Dogs are niggers and you are a nigger loving dogfucker.

>>51707711
six years for a test net and an alpha also a proof of concept for something they were already working on for the past six years

>>51717262
Aren't niggers the niggers of the animal kingdom?

>>51717585
>proof of concept for something they were already working on for the past six years
This is about CCIP, anon.
You tried.

>>51717607
anon, its a poc. This should have been tested and ready to launch this smartcon. the team had six years and millions of dollars from ico then more millions from dumping tokens. Tripple a game company's can come up with a product in much faster time frame

>>51717666
>its a poc
A poc for Swift, the largest banking network in the world, and it's about the absolute key to pretty much every single innovation Swift is currently working on: interoperability.

>>51717702
its been six years and millions of dollars and they dont have a profitable product where is this okay in any other industry?

No i know nufag. ive been bag holding since ico. you dont need to read the literature to me

>>51717736
Chainlink is about to bring crypto to the legacy capital markets, and vice versa.
And you're crying about it.

>>51717750
you're still not answering my question you mutt. sergey and smchid himself said its another decade. which makes sense since they dont have a product for market

>>51717788
So sell

>>51717810
you still dont have an answer to my question

>>51717821
I want you to sell though

>>51717826
you already bought my bags . answer my question

>>51717494
>need a good owner

>>51717736
>where is this okay in any other industry?
This isn't any other industry anon.

>>51717860
It's ok in any industry

>>51717885
anon you have to have a product to sell. in this case they are selling api pings. They cant do that with whats available, since the network is being subsidized by the team (the money they got from dumping the price of the token)
>>51717890
the money faucet is turned off

>>51717913
>anon you have to have a product to sell.
This is crypto, no one's selling any products anon.

>>51717952
everything is a product

>>51717736
>its been six years and millions of dollars and they dont have a profitable product
1) it's 5 years

2) the larger feeds have all been profitable for over a year now.

3) Cardano is the same age and only released its ETH clone a few months ago. Ripple is a lot older, and still doesn't do a single thing other than being speculative.
Chainlink is infinitely more functional and usable than them, yet look at the rankings.

4) even if Chainlink actually didn't do a single thing right now (so no mainnet serving 95% of all the value in Defi), this CCIP thing with Swift alone is more than worth waiting a few years.

SEE SEE I PEE I SEE PEE

>>51709820
>7.68

>>51717967
>>its been six years and millions of dollars and they dont have a profitable product

>1) it's 5 years

beta version of staking is going to be released december. my guess the sergey has been acting its going to be the last week of the month. so yes six years before BETA STAKING.

>2) the larger feeds have all been profitable for over a year now.

then staking should be live now instead of being subsidized

>3) Cardano is the same age and only released its ETH clone a few months ago. Ripple is a lot older, and still doesn't do a single thing other than being speculative.

not sure why you're bringing up this shit chain

>Chainlink is infinitely more functional and usable than them, yet look at the rankings.
yes when its fully working.


>4) even if Chainlink actually didn't do a single thing right now (so no mainnet serving 95% of all the value in Defi), this CCIP thing with Swift alone is more than worth waiting a few years.

not really most linkers missed out on last bull cycle because sergey said staking was dropping this year. Not the last day of the year btw

In all seriousness what kind of price action do you anons expect in the next 2-4 years?

>>51706151
Heres a real insider leak
After ccip chainlink will stop providing data feeds on l1s that dont subsidize gas
Theyll require those protocols native on l1 eth to ccip their price feeds from arbitrum or whatever

Either way, you fucking pay

>>51718023
>so yes six years before BETA STAKING.
That would make it 5 years and three months.

>then staking should be live now instead of being subsidized
The larger feeds are not subsidized, they have been profitable for a long time now.
And you don't know what staking is even for.

>not sure why you're bringing up this shit chain
Look at its ranking.

>yes when its fully working
It is fully working; 95% of oracle-based value in defi is from Chainlink.
The remaining 5% includes Uniswap, Maker, TWAP, ...
The current Chainlink working product is an absolute monster.

>most linkers missed out on last bull cycle because sergey said staking was dropping this year
The last bull cycle ended in early November of the PREVIOUS year you complete moron.

>>51718023
Everyone but Dog coin retards and people that bought ETH sub 100 missed last bull run. Bitcoin did a whopping x3 from previous ATH and the world got fucked by corona. The last “bull run” was pathetic but maybe that’s the only kind of gains we will see anymore now that we are at the market caps we currently are at. Unless derivates begin being traded like on wall street in the crypto market.

>>51718053
this has been foretold for a long time, sergey cutting the free drug dealer samples and reducing the oracle addicts to begging

>>51718059

>That would make it 5 years and three months
beta staking is droping in december which is the last month of the year.

>>then staking should be live now instead of being subsidized
>The larger feeds are not subsidized, they have been profitable for a long time now.

so then staking should be live right now then right?

>And you don't know what staking is even for.
nu fag pls
>>not sure why you're bringing up this shit chain

>Look at its ranking.
idc about shitdano


>It is fully working; 95% of oracle-based value in defi is from Chainlink.
but its not because staking is not live


>The last bull cycle ended in early November of the PREVIOUS year you complete moron.
it didnt end early it was a double top you cuck

>>51718121
>beta staking is droping in december which is the last month of the year.
Which is 5 years and 3 months since anyone was able to invest.

>so then staking should be live right now then right?
You're flipflopping from "feeds are not profitable" to "feeds don't have staking".

>idc about shitdano
No, you only care about Chainlink; which is rank 21 right now, and you completely gloss over the rest of the top 20 which is 99% vaporware and scams.
You hold Chainlink to a MASSIVE double standard.

>it didnt end early it was a double top you cuck
I didn't say it "ended early", I said it ended "in early November", my brown esl friend.

>>51718174
>>beta staking is droping in december which is the last month of the year.
>Which is 5 years and 3 months since anyone was able to invest.
yuo're one of those retards that argue the minutia just to be right even though you understand my point arnt you?

>>so then staking should be live right now then right?
>You're flipflopping from "feeds are not profitable" to "feeds don't have staking".
im not really you just dont understand my point.
>No, you only care about Chainlink; which is rank 21 right now, and you completely gloss over the rest of the top 20 which is 99% vaporware and scams.
link is a scam at this point because if they had anything working the network would be live and fully functional

>You hold Chainlink to a MASSIVE double standard.
i hold them to one standard. Do what the fuck you say you're going to do. Not work on another white paper when you didnt finish what you set out to do in the first one

>>it didnt end early it was a double top you cuck
>I didn't say it "ended early", I said it ended "in early November", my brown esl friend.
kek well you got me there

>>51718249
>yuo're one of those retards that argue the minutia just to be right
You were off by a whole year lol

>im not really you just dont understand my point.
Your point changed from "feeds aren't profitable" to "feeds don't have staking".

>if they had anything working the network would be live and fully functional
The network has been live and functional since May 2019, and currently serves 95% of all oracle-based value in Defi.

>i hold them to one standard
Yes, and the rest of crypto to another.

looks like we got ourselves a good ol' autist showdown boys

these arguments can go on for days, I guess this thread is staying up for a while

>>51718312
more like three months but you can think you won the discussion idc at this point.


Your point changed from "feeds aren't profitable" to "feeds don't have staking".
if feeds where profitable then staking would be live right now. instead sergey is still subsidizing the network. why is staking not live anon?

>2019
they have been working on this since 17 and a couple years prior to that if you're in the know.

>>51718312
>Yes, and the rest of crypto to another.
no you're the onyl one bringing up other projects. if we make a deal and i dont deliver im not going talk about the guy standing next to me.

>>51718425
>if feeds where profitable then staking would be live right now
This makes zero sense, and clearly shows you have no idea what staking is even for.

>>51718458
Sergey himself said on January 1st that profitability on certain DONs on certain chains has gotten sufficiently to the point to release staking. If you have a problem with that logic then take it up with the big man.

>>51708936
more views than smartcon

>>51718458
ok buddy

>>51711116
kek underrated

>>51718492
This reasoning requires you to believe Sergey and disbelieve him at the same time.
You believe him when he said "nodes are profitable" on January 1, but you don't believe him when you said "staking isn't out yet so nodes are not profitable".
Literally Schrödinger's Sergey.

>>51718579
bruh, wtf is your point anymore? if the nodes have been profitable since Jan 1st where the fuck is staking?
very simple question

>>51718425
Steve said in the panel yesterday how long they’d been working together. I think he said since 2015 but maybe it was even earlier. I remembered thinking we were coming up on ten years.

>>51718579
the amount of mental gymnastics you're performing to be right is comical .

>>51718579
I'm not the other anon you are arguing with, I'm just saying that Sergey himself said that reaching the milestone of having certain oracle networks be profitable was the catalyst for the upcoming release of staking. I don't know if they are waiting to release staking until a greater percentage of DONs are profitable, or if it's irrelevant and they delayed for some other reason.

>>51717597
kek

>>51718592
>if the nodes have been profitable since Jan 1st where the fuck is staking?
Obviously there is more at play than nodes simply being profitable.

>>51718594
It's an extremely simple contradiction.

>>51718608
>I'm not the other anon you are arguing with
You joined his argument.
He's saying nodes are only profitable when staking is released.

>>51718625
>You joined his argument.
No I didn't lmfao, I simply made clear that there is a relation between the timeline for staking's release and node profitability. I didn't say anything more than that.

>>51718625
then why was the newfound profitability the milestone for announcing staking in Jan 1st?

>>51718625
>He's saying nodes are only profitable when staking is released.
kek thats what you're understanding?

>>51718642
>No I didn't lmfao
This: >>51718458
is the post you replied to.
Notice how the greentext literally says "if feeds were profitable then staking would be live right now".

>>51718650
>kek thats what you're understanding?
You LITERALLY said "if feeds were profitable then staking would be live right now".

>>51718646
It was obviously a milestone, yes.
Notice that even if Sergey literally dropped staking right then and there at the time of the January 1 announcement, the argument already falls apart since nodes were already profitable prior to that.

I came back to the board thinking that made a mistake selling last year. The facts is that Chainlink continues as in 2017, nice literature but no product. We have in front of us hard years in equities, so being in liquidity is the smartest thing.

>>51718680
you sir, are a master of avoiding the actual argument presented to you
wow
you could just say, "I don't know shit" instead of wasting everyone's time

how is this even an issue? just lower your slippage and turn your gas up completely defeats MEV bots. once again token not needed. linkies cucked by the slippage setting on uniswap

>>51718680
if they had a working product and weren't subsidizing everything it would be live now. instead we got lawyer speak in the beginning of the year about steaking being released this year( no one was expecting it to be the last day of the year).
they have been working on this for fiver years nine months and still dont have an actual product delivered thats profitable. Again if they way the network is right now and it was profitable staking would be live right now, not a beta version.

>>51718650
>kek thats what you're understanding?
You also said "if nodes were profitable then they would have staking instead of being subsidized".
Clearly showing that you think node income is derived from staking.

>>51718713
It's very simple: the anon I was arguing with claimed that if nodes were profitable then they would have staking (instead of being subsidized).
As if nodes cannot be profitable without staking being released.

>>51718730
>if they had a working product and weren't subsidizing everything it would be live now
Then explain how nodes can be profitable without staking being live.

>>51718741
>Then explain how nodes can be profitable without staking being live.
sergey is paying for them by dumping on us

>>51718741
>Clearly showing that you think node income is derived from staking.
why have staking? ib4 muh collateral yah i get that, but the network pays out in the token. its used for payments as well as collateral nufag

at this point im just entertaining you

>>51718784
>sergey is paying for them by dumping on us
But he said nodes are profitable.
Was Sergey lying when he said "nodes are profitable", but not lying when he said "nodes being profitable allows us to move ahead with staking"?

>>51718724
You solved it bro lmao

>>51718802
why is a full version of staking not live after fiver years and nine months anon?

>>51718802
>he said "nodes being profitable allows us to move ahead with staking"?
????
then where is staking?
is this a troll?

>>51718704
>no product.

>>51718836
>>51718845
Nodes can be profitable before staking is released.
It's not that hard to understand.

>>51718859
>whers staking?

>>51718873
Staking not being released yet changes nothing about the fact that Chainlink has a massive working product right now already.

>>51718872
by sergey dumping the token and paying nodes. Which means no reason for staking which means no product because the network is not actually working . its being propped up.. by sergey

>>51718902
>by sergey dumping the token and paying nodes
No, the larger nodes are actually profitable.

>>51718890
that sergey is subsidizing.
>>51718909
then staking should be live right now and not starting a beta phase

>>51718823
oh nice argument. have you never used a DEX?

>>51718922
No argument here bro, just publish your findings and you'll be cryptofamous.

>>51718921
>nodes cannot be profitable because staking is not out yet

>>51718946
>he said "nodes being profitable allows us to move ahead with staking"?
>10 months later no staking in sight
????

>>51718960
Can nodes be profitable before staking is released?

>>51718970
only if sergey pays for them by dumping the price of the token

>>51718977
>only if sergey pays for them
So outside of Sergey, staking is the only way nodes get paid?

>>51718931
>publish findings
this is cryptocurrency. if it works just release it. fucking academic scammer jews
>smartcon
>smart con
it is very. enjoy sucking sergeys sloppy dumps and 1 dozen 500k fat hr roasties

>>51718988
since the network doenst have a working version of staknig yes. wheres staking anon?

>>51719007
For someone who doesn't have the faintest clue how Chainlink staking works, you sure are looking forward to it.

>>51719067
all we get from you link shills is snide remarks like this when we are trying to HELP YOU LEAVE THE CULT.

>>51718047
Chainlink will become the industry standard of web3. I’m thinking around 12 bucks is a fair price

>>51706151
>itt people literally talking about equivalent of OP's cat piss

>>51718249
LISTEN TO THIS ANON AND DONT LET PAID SHILLERS ERM I MEAN COMMUNITY ADVOCATES BRAINWASH YOU

>>51719539
Yes, listen to the dumb fuck who thinks staking is a source of node revenue.

>>51719644
>staking is a source of node revenue.
it literally is
I can't even tell who's baiting anymore

>>51719689
>it literally is
Tell me how.

>>51717666
>developing a buggy piece of shit game that's just a clone of better games is exactly the same as enabling interoperability among all blockchains and integrating with SWIFT

No.

>>51719689
I hope by now your face is the same hue as your id color

>>51719644
you're actually a retard

>>51720487
Tell me how staking is a source of node revenue

>>51720502
read the white paper. the first one

>>51720648
I did.
It doesn't say staking is a source of node revenue at all.

>>51720677
post a screen shot. i know you just changed id's you moron. you're still wrong

>>51707138
I see pee

>>51720677
>The ChainLink network utilizes the LINK token** to pay ChainLink Node operators
for the retrieval of data from off-chain data feeds, formatting of data into blockchain
readable formats, off-chain computation, and uptime guarantees they provide as op-
erators. In order for a smart contract on networks like Ethereum to use a ChainLink
node, they will need to pay their chosen ChainLink Node Operator using LINK tokens,
with prices being set by the node operator based on demand for the off-chain resource
their ChainLink provides, and the supply of other similar resource

>>51720715
>post a screen shot.
Post a screenshot of something that isn't in there?

>>51720741
Yes, that describes node fees.
Now post the part where it says staking is a source of node revenue.

>>51720741
stop spoon feeding this retard.

>>51706999
>spiritual nigger

>>51717262
Cats are the Americans, dogs are niggers.

>>51717597
YES

>>51717597
They speak human languages, but so do Huskies and parrots, fair enough.

>>51716179
I Laughed Out Loud

>>51709803
Lmao try 2024

indeed, indeed i urinate