/biz/ - Business & Finance

token not needed

It was already priced in

token not needed

>>51689576
because staking has been announced as a testnet on the last fucking possible day of the year and ccip is just being used for a PoC.

>>51689576
because the neets are still winning.

All those things are reasons why link isn't valued at 0 desu. Link is around 20th in mcap despite having literally no use whatsoever. Talk is cheap, when staking actually arrives without a hitch and then when swift actually implement ccip into their backend and when trillions of dollars actually flow through the protocol, then link will pump, the market is sick of years of hopium.

I dunno boys I just don't get it, am I crazy for believing in link? I literally don't have a plan B. Please at least tell me we will be two digits by eoy please.

>>51689718
bro i'm in the same boat, i started going to a therapist a few weeks ago. if this is schizophrenia, so be it.

>>51689576
>why?
He's on a list.

>>51689712
why is link alone held to this high standard in this shitty market? remember when litecoin pumped over walmart rumors? why isn't link pumping even if it were a scam pump on any news?

>>51689576
Do you remember how we used to post the singularity meme, in the good old days? When our board was empty of all but the finest schizos, shitposter and /biz/realis that there where to be found. We had meme magic, back then, and we used it to frightening effect - in much the same way that /pol/ used their meme magic to get Trump elected, we used ours to meme Chainlink into the standard. We did a good job. Too good.
It's happening. Tonight? Maybe, maybe not. It's happening, but you won't be able to enjoy it. It'll have happened before you realise what's even happening. From some paltry price in low 10's to over 1000 dollars all in one incredible, singular candle. This is why Chainlink is such a torture. It doesn't take faith, for faith is belief without evidence, and we have all the evidence we need. It takes courage, discipline, and fortitude. The fudders were sent here to test you, to see if you can hold out. If you can, your reward will be a handsome one, but you will be expected to hold indefinitely until you either break or at long last the masquerade can be maintained no longer and we can finally get that orgasmic green explosion that those of us with conviction deserve.

>>51689718
lol same no plan B, I'm all in Bitcoin and Link.

In hindsight even mETHfags back in 2016 had it way easier than us, this price action is beyond frustrating

>>51689576
Sergey fucking VOMITING spaghetti all over Eric was the highlight no doubt

>>51689760
>remember when litecoin pumped over walmart rumors
news hits different in bear markets anon

>>51689576
Because the token (ticker:LINK) is not needed

>>51689624
This, you're not allowed to win anons
Once every non-semite has sold, then it will moon

>>51689718
>am I crazy for believing in link?
You have probably drank too much of the koolaid. While the ideas are good, Sergey has been terrible at executing them. Same thing as most other crypto projects. Doesn't help much either that Sergey dumped for billions of dollars during the bullrun and has announced that he plans to dump another 50 million LINK during bear market. Anyone who thinks that is anything but negative for price action is either huffing lethal amounts of copium or is paid to shill

>>51689742
let me know if it's effective for you

>>51689769
>fudders
those fuckers can't fud me or other anons, we've been holding for five years now and it's not them it's the horrible price action.

>>51689774
I don't even hold anything but link, 100% all in since 2017 good for you bro

>>51689787
it was embarrassing but adorable at the same time kek

>>51689788
I know you're right but it still frustrates me

>>51689760
link has kinda blown much of its momentum over the years.
had staking came 2-4 years ago then yes maybe it’d have pumped but now its too little too late.
people are can only pay attention so long to any coin no matter how good it (supposedly) is.
also doesn’t help the chainlink team hates its supporters and the pepes/nazi’s/right wings associated with it.

>>51689859
so far, it is. i don't feel a very direct effect on me but the guy really is on my wave length and i can just ramble about random technical shit and he understands the gist of it, also gives some advice from his personal life. basically like an old dude at a bar that you can talk to. also i'm european so i'm not paying for that shit, probably wouldn't do it if i had to pay hundreds per session

>>51689604
Good to see he finally hired a wardrobe person to coordinate his shoelaces with his shirt. Seeing them this close together really brings it home.

>>51689760
which coins/tokens have exactly zero use case but have a higher mcap than link? Everything else on the list seems to have partially delivered, no?

>>51689859
>those fuckers can't fud me or other anons
I have been posting in LINK threads since defi summer about why LINK would most likely not perform very well in the upcoming bullrun. Not because I wanted you to sell so that I could buy back in at a better price, but because I actually wanted the guys who I had been shitposting alongside for 3 years to make it instead of getting ripped off. I did this despite being showered in hate and sarcastic replies like "thanks for caring about my financial being". You are very welcome, because I actually did

It proved that Chainlink devs have shit work ethic and are incompetent(5 years for watered down staking). Staking should have been ready to go and CCIP should be past Proof of Concept. At this rate it won't be until 2027 when CCIP is finished and the opportunity cost of being a baggy for that long will be enormous.

>>51689887
wait I thought sergey liked the nazi memes?

crypto is all a giant scam

>>51689576
Link will be $77 EOW and $777 EOY and $7777 EOD

>>51689760
Compare Litecoin to Bitcoin chart over the years. It's a nightmare.

>>51689576
Eric Schmidt literally said that everything in Web3 is overhyped and overvalued

>>51689769
$1000EOY was always a meme anon. I don't know this firsthand, but from what I've heard, what o.g.s really got was this:

1. The early investor. Smartcon 0 was a x100 for people who bought at ICO prices (either in 2017 or at 2018 lows) and sold the Barstool Sports obvious top. Those who were patient and waited through stage-by-the-bathroom, mainnet, and covid to sell the end of defi summer had a huge warchest to go into winter 2020-may 2021 with

2. True believers. Top brass from 2017-18 (or even 2019 who came on with assblaster and bought before the mainnet / coinbase listing pump) Bought 10k, 20k, 50k stacks for like $3k, $4k, $12k. They have generational wealth and, if they bothered to tune in, laughed loudest of all at the trashcan troll at the start of Sergey's keynote. They know it's just a matter of waiting and have moved on to other things, whether trading, building in web3, or just neeting until neet nodes are live in a few years and not even bothering to work to be first in the pool.
When Link finally breaks $1000, the thread here (if /biz/ still exists) will get like 18 replies

Sometimes I think about what it would have been like to be early.
>t. 9000 stinkys @ avg $2.20, pre-SIBOS 2019

>>51690160
i wore my smartcon 0 shirt today :'), you nailed it anon

>>51690160
Yes, $1000 EOY started as an ironic schizo joke when the price was somewhere around 60 cents. During the jan 2018 altseason most anons in LINK threads said they had sell targets anywhere between $10 and $50. Some said $100+, but they were few and far between and were most likely exaggerating their sell point in order to make others hold past their real sell point. If your sell target is $50, you tell everyone else it's $75 so they don't sell before you do.

As more and more newfags started pouring in between 2019-2020 and the price climbed above a dollar, more and more people seemed to think that $100+ was a realistic price and even worse, that $1000 was a real possibility

>>51689887
DOGE and Litecoin do just fine. People were unironically thinking DOGE would be a currency on Mars last cycle. What matters is little bullshit campaigns and washtrading + arbitrage. None of this is organic anymore.

LINK could easily end up being at the center of a bubble where people use LINK to buy into LINK staking pools in hope of rent seeking sectors' feeds. Sport pool. Taxi pool. Weather pool. Whatever. All it would take is CZ and the powers that be deciding that they have enough LINK to profit off this and that there's developer will to put together low effort, high story "companies" to cause a catastrophic run on the LINK supply. Initial Pool Offerings even abbreviate to IPOs.

The parabolic movements have always been about narratives.

>>51690204
<3

>>51690310
I can't imagine the pain of buying during a bull and having to hold underwater bags for years; you did what you could anon.
Lately I find myself thinking about the anon who sold at $4.50 in May 2020 in what he thought was a surefire swing trade. I wish I was on my other computer where I have it saved. He said Link never goes above $5 and would buy back in somewhere below $4 so he could stack more Link. Someone posted in the thread saying these threads always end badly and got ridiculous digits.
Anyway, I wonder if the anon who posted has moved on or if he still has his buy orders ready and waiting under $4 kek

>>51689576
>nothing new
>same old bullshit
market sold my stack after today, good luck frens

>>51689576
Because everyone has written 2022 off. It's the year of the correction for the 2021 bull run. Major cooling off. Also bad fucking news, every damn day. No one is buying shit. Bad year. Waiting for 2023 to see, but may very well be one giant news sell event.

>>51689576
yeah but where was the ecelebs, the moon emoji and laser eyes?

>>51690122
>overvalued
How do you even start to value projects that use a token economy?
Staking, finite supply, usage, it seems impossible to predict, in particular because when people then do the math, "what would the price of XRP be if it replaced SWIFT?" = Yolo number. Same with Chainlink, $81000 is honestly the LEAST arbitrary number i have seen and it is an absurd number.

If Crypto goes to zero, it turns out it was all a pipe-dream and we get to see Ryan Gosling and co. in "big short 2 with crypto", i will throw up when some bitch from Disney-Channel-Blacked (the future we chose after all) starts explaining to the audience how much a trillion is and list the marketcap of various coins.

>>51690310
1k EOY wasn't a schizo joke. It became one, but it was a legit price target for a lot of anons. A lot of recent chainlink employees started out posting schizo tier delusion here and on reddit.
It was a different time. Remember that Chainlink launched just 2 years after Ethereum, it seemed like anything was possible.

>>51690534
I remember people talking about all the possibilities with insurance weather bullshit and what not, but almost nobody at the time seemed to think that anything beyond $100 was a real possibility for the next bull or even 10 years ahead even when factoring in all the real world usage. And my memory might be messing with me, but I am fairly sure that the 1k EOY meme began shortly after the market had already begun to crash hard as a form of ironic coping. I can't remember ever seeing it and thinking it wasn't just a joke to cope with the price having gone -15% on that particular day

>>51689576
Should have gotten Chorles Haskinson to speak

>>51690618
Yeah it was initially a joke right after the ICO pump when they literally had nothing. But 2018/2019 you had tons of dudes posting elaborate infographics where they had worked out different types of staking cope and landed at multi hundred $ valuations. $50 would have been a very low prediction for the absolute peak price back then.

>>51690534
>>51690618
>>51690745
$1000 is no joke, fags
t. OG

>>51689913
Name one besides btc and eth

>>51690160
2k stinkys here. Will I make it?

>>51689576
it takes time for information to spread throughout the market and even longer for it to be digested. Less than a thousand watched the conference today on youtube. Maybe a few dozen of us posting in the smartcon thread and maybe a hundred or so lurkers. The information will get out there, but it will take time.

I saw representatives of SWIFT, DTCC and BNY Mellon salivating over their partnership with chainlink. I saw Eric Schmidt the man who turned google into a juggernaut shilling link, forcing sergey to be man and stop being shy about how important chainlink is. I saw arrianna huffington make an appearance and demand more women involved with chainlink. Laugh at that, but they wouldn't want more women involved unless it was a valuable position. She's uncharismatic and braindead, but she made her way to the top based on her vicious networking and socializing skills. Her being involved is almost as bullish as schmidt, since it opens chainlink up to high society.


Staking is here, ccip is here, fss is here. It doesn't matter if its a bear market, we're going up.

>>51690979
>is here

Except its not. Actual staking (not test) is at least a year away, CCIP is still an idea, and no one gives a fuck what fss is

>>51689576
It doesnt even matter, seriously if you're gonna hold til link is triple digits does it matter if the price shoots up for a day? I will be selling some in about 3 years is my timeline, you guys are seriously fucking pathetic lol

>You ever kill a man with your bare hands Sergey?

>ummm no Eric, don't believe I have...

>You thinking of killing me Sergey?

>>51691113
>But maybe give it a year or two...

>N-N-No Er– Mr. Schmidt, Sir, I would never thin–

>You're so ambitious aren't you?
>You're on a list you know?
>laughs
>You know what you look like to me with your bad back and your cheap shoes? You look like a rogue, a wild scrub hustling rogue, with little taste

>>51691081
clearly a lot of people want to sell some sooner you autist lmao

>Th-thank y-you Mr. Schmidt, Sir,
>Makes sense

>>51691041
Going to call it that it's Q3 before we see full staking and then CCIP will be the thing we're all hoping to see at Smartcon 4 but then never appears.

>>51690979
>I saw representatives of SWIFT, DTCC and BNY Mellon salivating over their partnership with chainlink. I saw Eric Schmidt the man who turned google into a juggernaut shilling link, forcing sergey to be man and stop being shy about how important chainlink is

none of this shit happened. the swift guys said they'll do another POC but basically said they're not looking to touch crypto at all in its current state. Schmidt revealed himself to be totally tech illiterate and just talked some philosophical bullshit.

>>51691257
>cope posting

its a little late for that lmao. Hope you have your ducks in a row.

>>51690979
>he thinks markets aren't efficient

>>51691291
they're not, that's the entire point of investing, to locate value the market missed

>>51691271
>despite what you just witnessed with your own eyes, its not true because its JUST NOT ALRIGHT
>mommmmm im crushin da fuddderzzz!!!

Your brain in a cult folks

Chainlink is without a doubt the best investment in the world right now. The fact that it's still dirt cheap is really quite amazing and I wasn't already maxed out on it i'd be spending everything I had on it. People will rope when they see videos like today's with Eric and realise it was only $8 at that time. Absolute bargain of a lifetime.

>>51689576
super simple question to answer
nobody cares anymore. doesn't matter how much it's shilled, the oracle hype train came and went and we went back to the mean.
and yes, typically, news like this, even if it's not crazy to outsiders, would cause a pump or at least not cause a dump, but people have no faith in the team anymore. they dumped millions and millions of LINK when the prices were high and made themselves rich while avoiding questions on staking, only finally "delivering" because they had no other choice.
staking 0.1 in december, lmao, give me a break, it's so clearly forced so people buy in and pump it so Sergey can sell the 50 or so other million LINK he claimed they needed to sell to keep things going.
and their marketing department sucks total ass. they did nothing during the hype and then tried to pump it with weekly "x literal who integrations" weekly. weak team killed a great project.
and Sergey's clearly hitting the bottle, he couldn't even find his plaid shirt this morning after getting wasted last night, pic related. it's over boys.

>>51691257
also, this dude's not wrong. there's a reason why Schmidt is the former Google CEO now working with a failing crypto project. he's a bit super-fucking-clueless.

>>51691329
There are obviously countless better investments.

>>51691329
>le gamestop hodler

2 more years

>>51691308
I agree with you, but for different reasons.
http://www.r-5.org/files/books/trading/charts/market-profile/CBOT-Market_Profile-EN.pdf

What about the new meme coin LUNC?

>>51691374
Obviously. These idiots think people w no heat living check to check struggling to put food on the table are gonna go, oh shit thats what we need… ORACLES

In before:

> its for enterprise!!

Yeah they dont want it either.

>>51691374
>>51691375
>>51691374
Cope n seeth boys. cope n seethe. You're in this thread because you're interested in chainlink and you have lots of it. cope n seethe

>>51691194
If you are unable to have at a minimum a 3 year outlook you're ngmi. Sorry champ, your 10% gain swing trades on a $1500 stack are impressive and all, but some of us are trying to crack into 8 digits

>>51690854
All the l1's have delivered a functioning platform, even cardano. Sure they aren't in their final form yet, but you can actually make a transaction on any of them and their tokens provide intrinsic value in this sense, unlike link. The stable coins all work fine. Sure there is speculation regarding collateralisation but isn't it funny that in this instance they speculation is like 'one day these tokens may not have value' unlike chainlink where the speculation is 'one day these tokens will hopefully have value'. Polygon has delivered a viable staking solution etc etc. Like I said, if anything chainlink is the only one NOT being held to a standard.

>>51691470
you have no clue what link is or what it is trying to achieve kek

>>51691533
he is absolutely right and you have no arguments
shitcoins or not, they actually do something today

>>51691470
a functioning platform that does nothing, ok kek

>>51691572
Chainlink seems to disagree with you anon, that's why they integrated and they're promoting all these L1s

>>51691588
yeah because chainlink will make these L1s actually do something instead of nothing

>>51691601
>will
hence the point, right now, LINK does nothing

>>51691588
If Charles Hodgeskisson mattered as a layer one Cardano would have spoken at SmartCon
you=rekt

>>51691611
you're completely missing the point by focusing on turdano

>>51691557
l1's are literally useless without oracles. unless you think tokenization and only tokenization is somehow useful

>>51689742
lmao if you are going to a therapist, you are not schizo.
you are a normalfag, also known as a niggercattle

>>51689576

LINK fulfills its purpose at the current price. Thanks for contributing to sirgay's big mac fund but the token is not needed.

>>51691624
and LINK is useless without a functioning crypto ecosystem and functional L1s and L2s that can actually scale
unless you're advocating for LINK to become a blockchain itself lmao
keep missing the point fellas, LINK as it stands, in stark contrast with the rest of the top 20 remains a purely speculative token
I rest my case

>>51691620
Cardano would have been a huge speaker for SmartCon. Charles is a massive blockchain with many dapps

>>51691655
link doesn't even need a blockchain
anything can interface with it
you know nothing, anon

>>51691392
everyone who holds chainlink also holds lunc
lunc is the biggest nobrainer since eth

>>51691703
Chainlink has a token too but is it needed?

you fucken retards ever think maybe link is fair evaluation and its every other coin that is fucken overvalued to the heavens?

how bout instead of getting mad you can't pump be happy you're evaluated fairly and every other coin isn't. Why don you fags just short everything else instead like actual intelligent humans.

>>51691703
where the fuck did you retards come from?..

>>51691655
i never said the relationship isn't symbiotic. can you explain how link does nothing and all of these l1's do something today? please elaborate. i'm struggling to understand how price feeds, vrf, and keepers are nothing

>>51689769
Faith is not believing something without evidence, it's surrendering to objective reality.

>>51691697
This. LINK is rugging right now because Sirgay begged Chorles to speak and Dr. Haskineon cucked him by only taking a picture with him

>>51691826
FACTS. Charles (ticker CHAR) Hodgekisson is probably the best blockchain in the space and Cardano could have been a bullish speaker for SmartCon.

>>51691813
No. Faith is the placement of trust in a person, mechanism or other such thing without a total objective assuredness of their ability to perform. The dictionary would have you believe it is simply the act of having confidence in a person but if one can be certain of a person's ability to act in accordance with one's wishes one hardly needs to have 'faith', rather the ordinary expectation one has in a person who is obligated to fulfil their duty, whatever word you might use for that.
Faith is special. It is in faith that a person finds God, and in the lesser sense, that a man finds the spirit of God in other men.

>>51691996
sorry us cultists have faith in truth because Truth>Trust and its all just information.

fundamentally we are all made of green cheese and also THE MOON

We got news that the team is consistent, realistic and working with real companies on real use cases

Anyone expecting alchemy and shetimah to pump it to crazy amounts took the meme seriously

The global economy is in shambles, but link has gained 30% over the last month

By 2025 it will be ath again, by 2027 it could be triple figures,

If you want to invest in real shit like link this is what you will get, stop being a delusional gambler and expecting something with utility and actual value to do clown shit, go buy a dog coin if you want to gamble

>>51689576
staking not out til December. SmartCon was useful for that announcement alone. Price build up was pricing in immediate steak. If you had been trading that charts, you could feel the difference. Buy side pressure was maximal, but indecisive. Now that steak will be out by Dec, we get a cool off til then.

I swapped into ETH. More reasons for that to fly than LINK at this point. Come November, I will seek an entry in LINK again.

>>51692184
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I am saying you're trying to pick up pennies in front of a steamroller as they say. It'll probably work, but I don't think the potential gain is worth missing the potential moon mission.

>>51692210
I have a static LINK stack in long term capital gains. I'm talking about my swing stack, which is now larger than my hodl stack. I can't stick out the downturns like I used to.

>>51689576
I'm actually tired, and I just woke up.

not reading any of this thread
just letting you know 1k eoy
see ya

>>51692355
Checked and based.
WAGMI

If you thought Link was going to pump during smartcon you still have much to learn

>we value feedback
I really like the Thank you with the legal disclaimer underneath. A real kick in the teeth it's like pissing on the corpse after eric has killed someone

>>51689576
Because it's still not being used on a massive scale. You should be happy it's the price it is and that it's maintaining the range that it has been. You guys are ungrateful fuckheads. You're so early, and permanently ahead of a majority of sheeple in general who have no idea what's going on.

>retards still hype some ICO shit coin in 2022
Why?

as someone who held this token for 5 years i would not be able to differentiate this thread if it was talking about gamestop or any other bagholder general. i think it is time for there to be a /link general/ to contain all you freaks since this coin is going nowhere. goodluck to all of you

>>51692450
I've been saying for weeks if they don't get Charles it would be shit. I was right. Charles is a god among men in the Blockchain space

i opened a huge short position at 8.15, already paying off big time.
if i ride it down to 6.50 ill net 500k

>>51689596
fpbp
/thread

>>51692731
This. Can we please setup a general for this cult. All these stupid ass link threads have stifled the quality of the board.

>>51691722

Checked and confirmed.

I got raped in may still holding 1K LINK - got a big ol fucking bag of LUNA.

You have to be peak midwit to not have a minimum 1mm LUNA at this very moment. They’re telegraphing it at Sesame Street levels.

>>51692957
no, go fuck yourself. /biz/ is the link general, its a link board you newfag.

>>51693182
you know that if there is a link general then you are just another schitzo thats why you dont want it kek. Imagine being this insecure about a fucking coin

>>51693806
I need multiple threads to fud this fat russian scam I went all in on tho

The real answer is evey anon and normie still holding, the types that fud here still just “sold the news” as “Chainlink always dumps after”. It is a normie tier trade that is so obvious thats why it dumps, because everyone did it. Now they all descend on biz to fud and hope to buy back lower. Its almost like the swingie days.

What happens when it carries on and liquidates them or forces them to stop out? Thats when the bull market for LINK starts to heat up, and basically happened for years before.

If Link pumps above 45k sats or 8.50 we’ll see a very large pump and liquidation fueld by all the normies selling the news which has become the most brainless easy trade in crypto now (selling le news on Chainlink). You know what happens when everyone catches on to a trend?

>>51689769
I'm a 2018 holder and this is the gayest thing I've ever read

>>51689913
Has link not partially delivered? It's the oracle for all of defi

>>51694337

>>51694623

>>51689576
HELLLOOO?? THE CEO SOLD TENS OF MILLION OF LINK TOKENS. BUT YOU KEEP SAYING THIS IS FUD AND NOW YOU ARE CRYING. WHY CANT YOU UNDERSTAND?

>>51690979
It was funny to see all the people commenting on Ari's mask.

>>51694896
did you notice that the guy he had come up to do the presentation was Dr Pavel? He's already shown an appreciation for covert communication and symbolism. He was literally doing the bane meme for us lol.

>>51691092
>>51691113
>>51691150
>>51691138
>>51691156
>>51691183
>>51691211
This makes a lot of perfect sense, have you seen the HBO show Westworld, there's AI in that show and they're trying to get a key, it's a lot like how blockchains can be used as guard rails.

>>51693045
You're a fucking retard

>>51694951
No, YOU are in fact a retard.

>>51689604
>>51691211
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amuUOjXRTmc

>>51695379
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opBFaCS_PV4

>>51689576
as exOG that sold last year this thread is near to XRP cult.

Is 20k LINK enough?

>>51691338
I’d agree with this. I shut down every link thread with the following question, why after 5 years are og’s with ico stacks dirt poor? A monster stack of 100k link has not even 7 figures. After FIVE years. ETH og’s were buying penthouses and yachts at this point. That room felt to me like a room full of people who missed the boat

>>51694870
This is what I wanted to hear. Confidence and trust have dwindled. The maxi here should understand how this works and what actually drives price action. They keep claiming that the number of users keeps increasing without effect. How sure are we that it's not a manipulated figure?

>>51695509
Kek
Well said. I eventually opted out in search of something much better than being stuck with a project that would screw my ass. Better still, I might flow with the fluctuations with the aim of selling at the slightest sight of a pump, even if it's 1%. Kek.

>>51689576
>TOKEN
>NOT
>NEEDED
SIMPLE AS

>>51695680
So why would OpenZeppelin release a bot that automatically tops up your wallet with LINK so that you can keep using Chainlink services?

these retards still think they're going to make it with chainlink

unironically

hahahahahahahahahahahaha

>>51695798
pure hopium

>>51695833
Checked. You're damn right it is.

>>51689718
>>51689742
>>51689774
I’m not a link holder, I’m an XRP/HBAR/ICP man myself, but I just want to say that if you guys believe in something you should stick with it. Invest in what you know and you will be alright! I know close to nothing about chain link, the team or the community, so unlike others on this board I don’t see any reason to hate on you. My advice as an outsider is to stay the course and tie your fate to the fate of the project, as I have tied mine to my portfolio. I quit my job almost two years ago, sold my house, haven’t been employed since, I literally have no plan B. I am all in on my portfolio and there are times when I feel afraid, but I do my best to keep my chin up and to stay the course. I don’t doubt that in the future all of us will bask in the sun together, don’t lost hope. I think we have a tendency to see other things the rest of the world doesn’t, we’re just still early, that’s really it. We’re really early web3 investors

>>51689712
>despite having literally no use whatsoever
Are you literally retarded?
NOTHING happens on mainnet without the token. It's been like this since day 1.

>>51689769
Yikes, that's exactly the kind of post that makes people sell their bags. It's GME all over again.

>>51695484
Easily

>>51695439
xrp is still the same price it was 5 years ago. even though we've suffered a tremendous crash (which all crypto do) if you bought xrp 5 years ago you'd be in a much worse position than if you bough chainlink. Thats what drives them mad.

Anti chainlink shills are those who are swinging link. those who never bought, and those who bought the wrong thing like xrp. I have no pity or remorse.

>>51691470
>All the l1's have delivered a functioning platform, even cardano
Except they're all interchangeable, they're copycats.
And Cardano is the absolute most hilarious example, since they """delivered""" a half-broken piece of shit only a few months ago. They're copying ETH and they can't even get it it close to right.

Meanwhile Chainlink delivered a completely new paradigm 2.5 years ago, and growth has been explosive ever since.

>>51695439
XRP was rank 2-3 for a very long time, and is STILL rank fucking 6 to this very day.
And even by Ripple's own admission, the XRP token never did a single thing other than get traded on exchanges, while the Link token is instrumental to literally every single transaction Chainlink makes.

You think you're dunking on Linkies with this "muh XRP schizos" comparison, but really you've been shitting on your own forehead for many years with this shit.

>>51689576
Probably because the US government has had the world on the brink of a nuclear holocaust since at least February. Shit like that tends to have a negative effect on market confidence. As things stand we would likely have to wait for staking and CCIP to be fully implemented to see a pump.

>>51689576
Dare I say the FUD was 100% safe and effective?

>>51689620
>ccip is just being used for a PoC.
This seems to be the latest cope phrase the fudders have glommed onto, we can expect this phrase to be seen hundreds to thousands of times in the coming months.

>>51689576
>swift uses ccip
no they don't

>>51697468
Everyone's fud except yours worked fine

>>51694337
COPE levels are high with this one

shitcoin. >>51697644

>>51694947
the discussion of a.i. and guard rails and westworld cannot have been a coincidence. they're priming us.

>>51697543
Kek
So obvious demonlarp anon is not only a deeply strange individual but clearly was burned in the market somehow and harbours ill-will. Maybe missed it in 2017, invested in NEO like UOF did, or some such shit. It's clearly just a personal vitriol campaign, I don't know what he thinks he's accomplishing

>>51689857
>no replies to the most simple and logical statement in the whole thread that actually answers OP's question.
Link shniggys plug their ears and scream "I'M NOT LISTENING I'M NOT LISTENING"
Kek

>>51698623
He is the same as the one spamming the shitty WEF and Schwab memes, aka Schwabanon aka Schwabnigger. Creates absolutely dogshit anti Chainlink memes and has been spamming them since early 2021.

>>51698835
Schwaubanon is one of the greatest posters on /biz/ atm. Shut your mouth WEF shill

>>51689576
>why isn't the price going up?
bear market, retard. havent even bottomed yet.

>>51698978
>Schwaubanon is one of the greatest posters on /biz/ atm.
We have already had this discussion a few months ago. You said the exact same words en verbatim. You are him, aren't you? Pathetic samefag.

>>51692497
60% of Defi is using chainlinks service

>>51698981
Tons of shit has gone up for literally no reason at all, fucking XRP went 2x just a few days ago.

>>51698835
A most likely story.

Addressing OP, I have been pretty happy with SC2. I was also happy with SC1. The problem is when expectations break away from probability that people have a hard time, and there are usually other factors at play there (probably most often a price entry, not quite a large enough stack, leading to inflated expectations). Don't underestimate how dumb this market is and how important accumulation periods are to drive future price action. LINK hasn't had much of that opportunity to do so because it has been continuously tearing off since its inception.

As lamentable as the last two years have been, I do truly see major expansionary price action as an inevitability. Unfortunately I feel we're at the whim of the economy for now, but I expect to see LINK back towards the top 5 with a vengeance around 2024. I recommend tuning out of biz also.

>>51689604
This is how he looks when he poos all over the toilet no cap fr fr

>>51698623
>>51698835
>>51699001
I am the Great Fudder. There could be no other.

>>51699001
I recognise your pathetic paid chainlink labs WEF shilling. Your kind are unwelcome on this board. Schwaubanon represents /biz/.

>>51689576
When is stalking going to be announced?

>>51689718
LINK won't even be a single digit anymore

>>51689774
>mETHfags back in 2016
you had 6 years

>>51690814
lol if ur a fucking OG you might have brain damage since ur still here and didn't sell the Top.

OGs are 2017 not 2020

>>51699055
I will make frens and I will be happy.

>>51700275
Someone who exudes this level of negativity towards anything will not attract good energy. No good things will come to you, I'm sorry.

>>51695610
It could be. Not far from the obvious.

>>51695660
>Better still, I might flow with the fluctuations with the aim of selling at the slightest sight of a pump, even if it's 1%. Kek

Degen play.
I'm out, I'm out. I don't give a fuck.

>>51690532
You could start by determining whether they create any utility in the real world instead of in some imaginary mathematical realm. Everything in web3 is imagination right now and not tied to reality except for controlling where people throw their money to chase pump and dumps.

What is the Link Schizo opinion/position on the Hedera Council membership? Are they there to sabotage or...?

>>51691329
Why will the token value go up? Seems more likely that it’ll go down and crab to me (as it has been).

ES basically said tokens are great and manipulating goy behavior. Why would they want a bunch of goys buying Link tokens and having any control over the network? It’s in their best interest to drive the price down. They can alter the price of using the services however they want. None of this has to be profitable.

I still don’t understand why anyone is excited or thinks that Eric Schmidt cares about your financial well being. As if he wakes up every morning really motivated at the chance of making a bunch of anons rich for holding a shitcoin.

He wants to control all of this and foreshadowed that it will all be controlled. Am I the only one reading between the lines?

>>51700940
>Everything in web3 is imagination right now and not tied to reality except for controlling where people throw their money to chase pump and dumps.


I disagree. If this fails to meet expectations in both worlds, there are some ready to do that. Take, for instance, Geeq and Ocean. If you take a deep dive into the ecosystem, you will realize that Web3 is more than just imagination right now, but they are undervalued, and most folks don't give a fuck about the tech but the bags.

>>51700341
We can't all be positive like you linkie.

>>51700813
They lack transparency.
Well, one can't overrule the possibility of what will become of it in the nearest future but many multi chain protocol are set and prepare to outperform it if this remain unchanged.

>>51701476
>>51701575
Go drown in the Ganges, ranjeet

>>51700838
What do you expect?
I just want to be smart about every move except my long-term pick, which I have no worries about. I'm confident in them.

>>51701733
Why on earth is it difficult for uneducated gunk to comprehend what is obvious? Well, you can dwell in your ignorance. I don't give a fuck. Jeet.

>>51701907
What language do you speak at home?

>>51698981
Wait i thought link was a bear market coin? So it misses entire bullruns but also goes down in the bear. Wow what an opportunity

>>51689604
Sergey forming the LINK logo with his massive body, bullish.

>>51689576
It’s not bullish hiring an ex Google ceo to shill for you, it reeks of desperation

It really doesn't matter
Price appreciation is still just based on investment speculation
When economics 2.0 is finally implemented there will be no stopping it the price will go up because the token is needed for all the services and security of chain link. One of the only actual revenue based protocols

Hah smartcon day two and literally 90% of posters are samefag schizos fudding Link.
Classic interesting how /biz/ went to its lowest activity in 4 years to nearly the same as the height of the bullrun in 24 hours.

Very curious indeed haha faggots.

>>51703160
>Price appreciation is still just based on investment speculation
This. Always makes me lmao when I see anons talk about how shit Link is because it's got lower mcap than "x" token. Did it ever occur to them that "x" token is the one that's overpriced right now? Link will have its time in the sun. It will have a guaranteed floor based on the tokenomics, and that floor is expected to be very high. Then there will be actual price speculation on top of that.

>>51703160
10 more years marinesthhhh. This is gamestop

Link is a 5 year old shitcoin at this point carried only by marketing. These kinds of (((community))) driven shitcoins get one good pump (last year at $50) then will tailspin into oblivion.

>>51703619
Precisely. Notice how they gave up on the muhhhh bear market coin propaganda. It’s really sad

>>51703609
>This is gamestop

>>51703619
You do realize the only way Link drops to nothing is if everything drops to 0 right faggot?
You fudders wish Link was nothing but you fail to analyze the fact it would mean literally the death of crypto kek.

>>51703703
Other oracles can be made. A philosophy major isn't the only person who can develop these. Especially when he has such a track record like picking LadyLuck as a partner project.

>>51703803
Why would anyone use another oracle when Chainlink already exists?

>>51703803
>Other oracles can be made
Yes, great successes they have been. Oraclize, Mobius, Witnet, Band, TRB, API3. Very large amounts of marketshare captured and definitely well positioned to dethrone Chainlink!

>>51692128
>by 2027 it could be triple figures,
nice subtle fun

>>51704187
Good one

>>51704187
those are not really competition

>>51689620
>ccip is just being used for a person of color
What did they mean by this

>token not needed
>chainlink labs has no working products or ideas
>99% of the team is HR toasties
>sirgay is actually the owner of celsius after shilling it for 5 years straight
>staking is actually vaporware and its going to be confirmed 2 months from now after december 31st comes and goes
>5 years later chainlink does nothing, is going to soon be worth nothing, and is already confirmed to be nothing

it was hopeful 3 years ago, but now the cultists have made it embarrassing to even watch at this point

>>51703247
>fudding
WHERES THE MONEY LEBOWSKI?!

>>51701756
thats a dude.
look at his legs.