/biz/ - Business & Finance

>third announcement
Of course last mont h

december 2023

>>51680094
Two more weeks

SISTERS!!!

app out on oct 3
"community engagement"

Economy confirmed for rugging in December after midterms.

Can't wait for staking to only be available to a handful of sergey's friends and investors.

>>51680094
>Jan 1st
>staking will launch this year
>unironically launches at the end of december

i remember people calling for december as a joke, you cant make this shit up

>>51680247
this
fudders were completely vindicated

when was that announced? I'm watching smartcon live and he never mentioned staking.

>>51680322
journalists hold articles until a certain time
decrypt put the article up early
>>51680247
consensus staking announcement in june certainly looks unnecessary now...

>>51680322
within the past hour. decrypt leaked it early, roastie moment.

All my LINK is on an exchange rn, do I need to move it to a wallet? Or is it too late anyway?

>>51680094
hi adriana want some fug//

>>51680469
You have to check if you are eligible for staking first.
Only early buyers are allowed first

>>51680094
This was so depressing. Honestly i really could have done with some ok news for once in my life.

>>51680994
Sergey will likely throw a bone to early guys with a condition for being early, but it will mostly be based on stack size. I can't see the date that your LINK was bought being a limiting condition. There are many big players that didn't buy back in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, or even 2021 because they did not exist yet. This could create buy pressure. There's now incentive for non-node operators to have large stack sizes.

So it seems that the longer you held, the more LINK you are eligible to stake and the 7000 LINK seem like the absolute max, just from estimating how big the average stack is and how big the initial pool is. I guess the nodes also have their own eligibility sizes, which means you can probably get more than 7000 if you fill 3rd party pools on top of your max allotment.

AWS is a Ripple partner though

>>51681102
He said it would be based on the interactions with the network, so I assume there will be multiple conditions that have to be met.
One of them will be definitely early investors as an incentive and then huge networks, that used the token on a regular basis

I'm a complete retard. What does staking do now? I have 5k and holding it since forever.

>>51681596
the initial v0.1 will be risk-free yield farming, not more really. but still pretty big. it will be "backing" the ETHUSD feed i think and some others. i would say just take 5 minutes to read the staking blogpost from a few months ago, but tldr it's proof of stake but with oracle inputs, good inputs will be rewarded, bad ones will be punished and stakes will slashed

>>51681690
how bad is it to put your future on link staking? want to quit the rat race.

>>51681748
what do you think we are all betting on here bruh

>>51681120
So what happens if I kept my stinkies on Binance the whole time and moved it around to BlockFi plus lots of short term trades. Am I eligible?

>>51681120
seams just like a way to slash stacks of early autists from 4chan
remember there is no protection yet

>>51681808
you will see on monday. if not you have a second chance at the general lane or with v1 and upwards. remember 1b is all there is and most will be staked over time.

>>51681813
There is no slashing in the early versions.

>>51681813
it's the other way around, there is no real risk. and since it's in house, they could literally just reimburse you and would probably be forced to if they actually fucked up and wanted to have any trust left

holy shit he just said to tune into the swift talk to learn more about ccip

>>51681824
What is on monday?

>>51680094
I knew when he announced staking would this year back in January it’d be in December, I am still doubtful it even releases. Probably gets delayed and Chainlink dumps to $4.0

>>51680247
HOLY FUCKING SHIT AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>51681938
Early access approval process begins for staking.

>>51680094
The Top 3 Possible Chainlink-Staking Outcomes:

1.
>staking finally arrives
>unstaking requires Level 70 VAXXPASS™

2.
>mandatory staking
>lock-in period: 3 years
>may never unstake

3.
>no staking ever comes
>the Great Reset is dead on arrival and Chainlink goes to zero

>>51681929
this

>>51681929
When will it be?

>>51682354
70min~

>>51681120
Link to see if you’re eligible?

>>51680994
I bought in 2017 but how would they know that? Bought on Binance I think originally but hasn’t been there in years and I no longer even have that account

>>51682966
they will probably go for the external wallets that bought at presale and ico and have not traded it since

>3%

>>51683422
comfy

>>51683422
For a company that lets you invest into the future TCP/IP, that's a great long-term incentive

>>51680247
I have to admit he managed to over perform on the delay.
I thought this would be the strategy for CCIP but if staking is delayed until December then it could be worse for CCIP.
The other question is how long the v0.1 will last until v1.0 is supported.

>>51680469
Kek yours are on an exchange , i sold half of mine for MILE like last month because staking was taking so fucking long

>>51681120
>V0.1
>5 years later
>verified solely based on wallet activity
Even a fucking retard knows to move addresses occasionally for opsec purposes. This is what desperation looks like.

I SAID
I FUCKING SAID IN JUNE

I think at some point in the near future we should delegate an anon to run a node comprised of 1-5 link from every linkie on this board, and proceeds of that will be used to fund Big Mac meals for any anons who foolishly squander their link. Like anons who lost their shit in Celsius, and others who will not stake but blow thru their link funds in 1-4 years like athletes and power all winners do. That way they will never starve.

>>51680247
>>51680308
No, it was you. You are the fudders and talking out of your ass once again. Pathetic faggots.

Is 250 (Two Hundred and Fifty) Chainlink (Ticker: LINK) enough to make it?

I can sell some other coins and bring it up to 400 at best.

Only started DCA'ing 2 years ago.

>>51684621
>move addresses occasionally for opsec purposes
Give me an actual proper reason why. You can't because you don't know what you are talking about.

>>51686198
>he unironically can't fathom a single reason to change wallets
dusting attacks, wallet being linked to a certain KYC exchange, paranoia due to several txs done on a single wallet off the top of my head
your posts only serve to demoralize me further anon

>>51686198
oh, I actually know someone IRL who was stupid enough to share his seed phrase with his ex, he ended up having to reset his ledger seed phrase and consequently change wallets as well

>>51686465
Would it have made any difference if he was using a private wallet?

>>51686403
>wallet being linked to a certain KYC exchange
The most common way through which identities are compromised. Once the wallet address is known and tagged to an identity through KYC, that's the end. All the transaction history can be easily monitored and tracked without any restrictions

>>51686939
nah, he shared the seed bro
erc20, btc, fucking monero it doesn't matter

>>51680094
Flux is already AWS.of Web3.

>>51686939
>Railgun wallet
Private wallet is the solution for many things but not that.

>>51681120
I mean doesn't this show that early access will only be for like 2 or 3 weeks before general access opens in December? why do people care if they aren't in early access?

>>51680162
*months
well, almost.

>>51688555
Having a guaranteed vs a possible spot, for starters. Also, 7k LINK @1KEOY and 5% APY is an extra $13k income over those two weeks.

>>51680247
>new years eve
>well, actually guys, we ran into some trouble so we will have to postpone it to Q1 2023 but you will not be disappointed by the result. we would rather not rush something as important as this

>>51680094
>aws of web3
Still wondering how that will work out on the long-run, given the irregularities in transitioning from web2 to web3 due to the complexities in keeping a simple profile.

>>51687094
>ORE
Another reason why it's best to secure seed phrases and keys with an account protocol that limits users access to them.

>>51680094
I am checking that 666 in your ID since everyone missed it. We are all going to make it this year. Screencap this.

>>51680094
Dat ID
>666hajWo
Dark times ahead.

>>51691626
>666 hajj world order
inshallah brother I will see you at Mecca

How much will 3.5k linkies net me in staking pay outs per annum?

>>51680177
Gonna be some twitter engagement metric tool . Too bad for all you non twitter 4chan losers lmao. no stakey wakey 4 u! sad!

>>51680247
>>51680308
what industry do you work in where projects aren't completed at 90%+ the initial deadline every single time?

I’m never staking I’m selling it all and getting laid

>>51693596
Probably a shit ton. You are a pretty big guppie here on 4chan… but you’ll be a BBC with 3,500 to 99.999999% of the world

>>51693596
175 chainlink

>>51681120
Read the fine print..."if the pool has not been filled"

The pool will be filled in seconds.

LPL token needed.

>>51693596
how does $35 sound?

>>51689465
Math is not your strength.

>>51693596
350k a year

Does anyone know how to find their own wallet ranking? If 25,000,000 link can be staked initially, that means that around 3500 people can get in the first pool...

>>51680094
Staking 1.0 will be live just in time for Web5

If my link is on the avalanche C-Chain will I still be able to stake it?

>>51694451
Top 1000 are shown on etherscan Link token page under 'holders' tab (halfway down page). Don't know how to see 1000+ but post it here if you find out

best wallet to hold link if you hate eth?

STACKING AND STAKING DEM LINKZZZ
W
A
G
LINK
I
chain.link

>>51697384
I've got bad news for you kid

>>51680094
11k chainfag reporting in