/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51619302
HONK HONK

genuinely interested to know why LINK is underperforming considering all that.

>>51619302
I don't really blame retail. Degen ape moonboys are fucking retards who "aren't in it for the tech, I'm just here to make money" and as such have no capacity to assess one project next to another because they have no idea what any of the technical words mean anyway.
But I do blame talking heads, thought leaders, ETH maxis, and all of the other people who put on a respectable, knowledgeable persona on social media but then for some reason collude to absolute radio silence even when the SmartCon line-up drops with the biggest institutional players ever seen to be interacting with any part of crypto.
/biz/ likes to blame shorters, malignant actors, psyops and everything else, and maybe those all play a part, but in the end there is no getting around the fact that, quite simply, 99% of the crypto space has still completely failed to understand Chainlink, either out of pure ignorance, malice, or coping deliberate obtuseness.
None of the shorts would work if people actually understood what was going on and bought Chainlink in bulk. Dumping BTC wouldn't work if people, en masse, just kept buying LINK anyway. But they don't. Because they're too stupid and obstinate.
We bought LINK because "retail doesn't need to get it" but I am honestly blown away by the depth and extent to which they still continue to fail to see what, at this point, is so so so fucking obvious to most people here.

>>51619302
ETH token

>>51619344
>>51619302
Token not needed

>>51619349
Powell said in the future there will be no tailwind to the markets and it will have to grow organically and if they've got the correct number of testicles and people have to actually make valuations during this recession then finally there might be credit where credit is due. I can list probably 100 coins with active uses and business associations that aren't worth a piss and should run the world.

That being said, token not needed.

>>51619349
I agree mostly, but you have to also consider that chainlink is not a finished product like an L1 is...people see eth tokenomics work and the token has a complete life cycle and thus they know that all the copycat L1 are also complete products to a degree....

A large part of what chainlink is trying to pull off with steaking and Dons is still theoretical, to some degree we cant really be sure it will even work... however if it does work our upside will be bigger than anything else in crypto...

>>51619360
blockchain agnostic tho. chainlink dont be discriminatig yo

>>51619349
lmao name five "thought leaders"
>who put on a respectable, knowledgeable persona on social media
they simply DO NOT exist for crypto. every single person is a degen psychopath hellbent on money power whores and cocaine

>>51619302
why doesn't it make sense that a project with all that support from globohomo would be suppressed as much as possible? it's correct play for every participant, except /biz/neets, to keep prices low.

>>51619349
>99% of the crypto space has still completely failed to understand Chainlink
It's more than this. Yes they have failed to understand, but not because they have tried - they have not. None of those entities have been paid by the team to shill link, the way all other projects would have done. Maybe serg and team thought they wouldn't need to because link is so ground breaking, but ultimately it is hard to understand, and the gate keepers of crypto media likely never tried due to nothing on offer from link

>>51619302
As an asset in recent years it has performed like ass because of the big mac flannel shirt dumping, now people just expect to get dumped on so won't touch it.

>>51619548
my ass, all other projects dilute supply with node incentive just as much if not more, it's such a bs narrative, look at solana

Alpha here boys straight from Twitter

fuck forgot the Twitter Alpha

Proof Twitter is the Happiest Place on Earth

>>51619598
Does solana dump millions of their token every week?

Scam

>>51619302
non-needed erc-20 token, which doesn't generate any revenue, share any value with investors, or has any utility (even though the tech is legit and useful) has ho reason to "skyrocket" baggie. The only retards who would buy this shit are the likes of you, serving as paypigs for that fat russian.
I seriously hope you retarded baggies get lost in some containment thread eventually, like the xrp-tards

>>51619705
Sol had about a 8% increase.

Link has a 6%

>>51619349
The market understands just fine, that's why the price is so low. Investors have looked into the business model, decided that there is no growth potential left in providing price data for complicated online gambling and are moving their funds elsewhere, hence the price falling. It's not hard to understand, only those that don't are staying behind, spinning stories of how reality isn't what it blatantly is

>>51619803
SOL is a fully working L1
LINK is a utility token currently lacking utility (staking/slashing)
it's really not that difficult to comprehend

It wont moon because I bought it3

Seriously though, they promised staking this year, its almost october, no staking

>>51619302
>>51619349
>>51619399
WE GOT SOME CHAINFUCKS IN HERE. CHAINLINK WILL GO TO FUCKING ZERO. 99.9999% OF PEOPLE THAT OWN CHAINLINK ARE FUCKIN MORONS. RETARDED IMBECILES. SOME OF YOU ON THIS BOARD FALL INTO THAT CATEGORY. IF YOU REALLY KNEW WHO WAS BEHIND CHAINLINK, YOU WOULD RUN AS FAST AS YOU CAN TO SELL IT.

>>51619302
none of the organizations you mentioned endorsed chainlink, especially not google. and even vitalik isn't going to smartcon so the entire event obviously has zero relevance. a top25 coin hosting an entire crypto conference is kind of cringe anyway.

>>51620447
Okay but that is a completely different reason. The anon implied link's inflation was the sole reason for it's poor performance

>>51620591
inflation = selling pressure from the founders + no actual utility = no reason for speculative price appreciation

>>51619598
But LINK only exists as a security to dump to raise funding, other aspects of its existence aren't complete in-spite of years of already dumping tokens. How long can you realistically attract new investors for with "staking coming, trust me bro", whilst having shit price action and dumping on old investors in the background.

>>51619349
Doesn’t your arrogant tiny little brain understand that people don’t buy link because there’s no value proposition to it? No staking, no retail involvement. Nodes dumping link to pay for gas costs. Meanwhile a fat retard ceo raising BILLIONS (!) dumping on his followers. But no, the market is dumb not me the linkie!

>>51619786
Link pumped last in 2021 and by not nearly enough considering eth's run. We are owed more.

>>51619630
>posting his own chan post to twitter

Cringe. Youre that Drake fag from the link telegram. You were coping so hard last year while link missed the entire bullrun. Still delusional I see. 5 years still no staking. No one wants to buy this faggot. Get ready to miss another bull to dog coins while serg continues to rob you blind. Loser

>>51620610
Precisely. So painfully obvious to everyone not in the cult

>>51619302
All you link faggots better nab some eth during the bear. And by nab I mean put in 6 figures minimum and sell when eth hirs 10K in 3-4 years. Don’t round trip again retards.

>>51619349
Reminds me of pic rel, not much has changed

>>51619302
HAHAH HONK! :D Still believe getting rich is down to skill and not luck? HONK HONK :D:D:D:D If god exists he's a nigger.

>>51620743
Whoever this is absolutely roped by now

>>51619349
Most people don't understand the value the network will unlock, it requires experience in software, economics and at least a basic understanding of cryptography
This mix is in very limited supply
We've had the opportunity to see potential value before the market, all the market will be able to understand is 'buy and make money', and at that point they'll start pricing out everyone.
Also, fuck retail, bunch of retards who ignored every warning we gave

>>51620598
I was mistaken. Sol had a 25% inflation.

Are you implying that the sol token is used more then then the link token? Are you sure about that?

>>51620925
yes, absolutely

>>51621033
You have got to be trolling...

https://tokenterminal.com/terminal/projects/solana

Check cumulative revenue for 7 days.
@ ~30 USD per sol; 12k Sol tokens.


Check https://market.link/overview , 7 days.

110k Link in revenue.

Link is used literally 10x more then Sol.

>>51621083
oh shi snap city. this sounds like exactly how based chainlinkgod rekts fags over on Twitter

>>51621108
fuck off twitterfag

hes got to be trolling and baited me into reply

>>51619469
This is too true, most of the traders that made it did so not by investing in valuable projects but front-running news, arbitraging, and just dumb luck with leverage.
All these guys are lauded as geniuses.

This rick and morty guy that larps as a MEV researcher who didn't even know basic shit about Chainlink FSS.
That other guy who's who shtick is that he's fudding Terra (good job man, nobody saw it) dunks on Kleros' concepts while having read none of the literature.
Cobie and his clique of midwits.
So called VCs that don't even know what a miner is pouring billions in alt L1s.
Even community leaders shilling their seed investments on podcasts while clearly better alternatives are out and running.

The whole optimism team being lauded as geniuses too while it took Geohotz, who wasn't even in the cryptosphere, to dab on their devs and deliver their transpiler in a day.
At least I'm glad Arbitrum is holding its rightful place.

It's all rotten to the core.
If next week isn't Chainlink's moment, I'll know for sure that this whole space is just not ready and might never be.

>>51619630
Drake is such an unsufferable faggot and I say this as a very long time linky.

>>51621128
Also look at the absolute state of /biz/.
I'd honestly put up a paywall and accounts at this point.

HEX, XSG, LUNC, RBC, all this fucking trash which also dumped like crazy still garnering immense attention a normie capital.
If there is one thing that I got out of my whole adventure with crypto is that jews are absolutely on point with everything.

>>51621128
nano oracles son

>>51619302
>about to release staking, bridges, zkp privacy oracles, MEV solution

See i don't understand what any of this means.

How would chainlink improve my life?

>>51621124
>knows he's being trololed
>replies anyway
you played yourself

And yet the token is not needed

>>51621203
You buy now then stake, then you get 5% of your total probits issued to you every year and you live off that money :)

>>51620921
>le segrettttt investmant!!!!

Cringe. Two more weeks til they “flip the switch” right? Xrp 2.0

Remember the /biz/ FUD campaign? “Gotta keep the normies out! LMAO!” Well there ya go.

We did it /biz/!

>>51619302
its function does not need a token, hence why token not needed

>>51619349
IA is an example of a thought leader who is absolutely incorrect about link and encourages his witless followers to avoid it.
My dad and uncle both listen to that dipshit religiously because he checks all the boxes for a boomer investment advisor.
He’s doesn’t get too complicated, he never talk about the tech, and he convinces people that he’s pragmatic.
Him Ben Cowen are the ones who says “Link is inflationary” and every one of their retarded followers end up going into shit like Celsius or Luna.

Why take the time explain all the value Chainlink will provide and all the different features they’re working on when you can call it inflationary and move on to something easier to explain to these smooth brained Neanderthals.
Don’t underestimate the influence these guys have on the crypto market. If IA or Bitboy shills something, millions of people look into it, which is a substantial percentage of the total number of crypto investors.

>>51621083
>110k Link in revenue
that's not revenue, that's subsidies
SOL token secures the network and grants you access to SOL's ecosystem.
what does the LINK token do right now? what do you personally use the LINK token for?

>>51619615
>>51619630
i hate these twitter fags. the ONLY good one is my waifu junko.

>>51621083
to add on that
>SOL: 2,000+ validators
>LINK: exactly 27 KYC nodes
>SOL: over 2 million unique addresses
>LINK: peaked at 700,000 over a year ago, slow decline since then
need I say more?
>inb4 TVL!1!

>>51621792
This isn’t the designated shitting street, Ramjeet

>>51619344
I’m syrup as to why any of these news would make the token needed

>>51619349
>Degen ape moonboys are fucking retards who "aren't in it for the tech, I'm just here to make money"

i was telling my older brother about chainlink in february of 2018, he would sometimes drive me to work and i'd be telling him to buy link but he wasnt too interested in the crypto market because his only experience with it was buying a pump and dump and getting fucked.

fast forward a couple years he kind of regretted not buying any, he missed the 2020-2021 bull run and that was on his mind too. and in the tail end of the latest bull run in about november of last year some guy called in to his job for an issue he was having unrelated to crypto. but the guy was a californian normie who in the middle of talking about his issue claimed he was making it big on crypto.com and had a fuckload of Cro and passive income from the site and was telling my brother to get into the crypto market. this was the final push he needed, a crazy californian. so after having a hard time and finally setting up a coinbase account instead of buying btc or eth or link he proceeded to buy Doge after the doge bubble had already popped. his reasoning? it was cheap.


it was higher marketcap than chainlink at that time and i explained it to him that in a sense link was cheaper than doge but he didn't care and was like "Yeah I can only buy a small amount of chainlink. But if I buy Doge I will have thousands of them." he didn't know about shiba inu at this time. but a day or two went buy and he kept marveling about how much Doge he had. so i graduated him on and said "you think that's cool? Check coinbase... Check out Shiba Inu. This is what you're looking for" and he was fucking floored by how cheap shib was. he quickly sold all of his doge for shib and he started buying even more a couple of times a week. he'd laugh and be like "IMAGINE IF THIS SHIT WENT TO EVEN $1 LOL!!!!" after a few months he sold it but he still watches the shib charts from time to time, gives 0 fuck about link.

>>51621814
post hand, Sandeep

>>51621880
It's a real shame LINK launched in 2017 when the standard was 1 billion token supply ERC-20s, if it launched today there would be a minimum of 10 billion and therefore the price would be 10x higher even though that shouldn't make any sense.

>>51619302
>any other piece of shit with this level of accomplishments would instantly skyrocket to the top 5
They spent half the US' GDP to keep Link from skyrocketing.

>>51621128
Yeah cryptosphare is still for dumb money. I remember old /biz/ speculating that we would have more quality last bullrun but things got even more retarded. Good news is that things are evolving in the background and we can ride the adoption even tho it takes longer than speculation.

>>51619786
LMFAO this is the best AI rendition of "-ACK!" I have ever seen.

>>51621963
It's actually insane just how fucking stupid the market was. I thought crypto kitties and deep brain chain were the absolute rock bottom for a public market. Couldn't have been more wrong.

Most of retail doesnt even understand how they are being fucked over by third parties and they have zero counter-party risk so they do not understand the very basics of chainlink. That being said, when googling chainlink you are met with over-ecstatic retards and pure FUD. I thank the Fudders for enabling me to continue to buy link in 2022 for so cheap.

Remember not to long LINK with leverage so that they can't long squeeze crash it.

>>51620921
But you understand, right

>>51621742
>what do you personally use the LINK token for?

> get data onto the blockchain for my smart contract
> run cron tab scheduling
> Do any kind of random number generation in a secure manner

You should learn about smart contract development. If you want to get anywhere, you're gonna need chainlink one way or another.

>>51619302

>>51621746
Who seems to have deleted her account.

>>51621856
Try again, pajeet.

>>51620864
Try not being a newfag

>>51619349
Holy fuck the amount of onions in your words is just unbearable. Fuck you and your links

This shit coin wil hit $0.00 after smartcon and I will be able to buy all of it

>>51619401
This is correct. Right now it simply doesn't do anything it says it will "soon." It can give me a random number and tell me how much Matic costs. That is all. There are no tokenomics at work that tell me it is worth anything. I of course believe it will, but right now, it's theoretical.

Second, they have done nothing to let the world know what they are up to. It's not that hard to get a slot on CNBC or get some analyst to pay attention of do some pitching to publications. They don't do any of that. So if the game plan truly is to wait for people to catch on, well then they are doing an amazing job at remaining unknown.

>>51621963
>things got even more retarded
Why is this happening though? Did people just give up on value?
I remember that Lex Fridman podcast where he discussed with Vitalik if "fun" and "memes" were a legit feature of a coin and thus Dogshit trash was legitimate. What the fuck? And I think Vitalik is at fault here for even entertaining this idea that shits all over his life's work.
Maybe we're having it too good and degeneracy is always happening with we're in an age of plenty.
But then again when people are completely rekt, cult mechanics take over and the clown show continues. Old /biz/ is guilty of having laid out the strategy for cults with Link.

>>51619598
They don't dilute as relentlessly and unceremoniously. No other project onboarded hundreds of staff and secured 100% of their financing through toxic financing. Other projects undergoing hypergrowth attract venture or angel capital in addition to dumps. Sergey just clubs his investors like seals, puts on some nipple tassels, gives them a little spin and expects the simping to continue.

This type of financing is usually reserved for exploration miners and pre-approval biotech companies. In both of those cases, the expectation is that these companies either die or go parabolic and the investment strategy is to dance around dilution and reverse splits or to make 10-20% plays during the build up to announcements.

LINK has become this for most people and needs to rebuild trust. More so if their operational runway is short and they need people to support a price floor should they go back to years of dumping.

>>51623376
Spot on

>>51623397
>>51623376
Samefag

>>51623438
Hehe le bulgarian fudder nexo is insolvent right?

>>51623376
>They don't dilute as relentlessly and unceremoniously. No other project onboarded hundreds of staff and secured 100% of their financing through toxic financing. Other projects undergoing hypergrowth attract venture or angel capital in addition to dumps. Sergey just clubs his investors like seals, puts on some nipple tassels, gives them a little spin and expects the simping to continue.
You *want* VCs? Simply because it's more *normal??? Why the fuck is it any better if you invite-in an intermediary to defer a dump? You know they'll just dump on you later? Right?
>This type of financing is usually reserved for exploration miners and pre-approval biotech companies. In both of those cases, the expectation is that these companies either die or go parabolic and the investment strategy is to dance around dilution and reverse splits or to make 10-20% plays during the build up to announcements.
>these companies either die or go parabolic
>go parabolic
the investment strategy is to wait until they go parabolic
>LINK has become this for most people and needs to rebuild trust. More so if their operational runway is short and they need people to support a price floor should they go back to years of dumping.
>needs to rebuild trust
no. they need to build an oracle network. which is what they're doing.

>>51620650
Why do you know all of this stuff about Link? I don’t research all the tokenomics/roadmaps of coins I don’t care about. I don’t even go into their threads. Really weird it’s almost like you own link and are upset or are trying to persuade people it’s a scam….. regardless you are a double nigger faggot gtfo out you kike.

>>51622727
see>>51623076

>>51619302
>replaced by xrp in swift ISO

>>51619630
What the fuck is your problem you underage faggot, go to twitter and stay there.

>>51623293
You really take crypto seriously, don't you? lol

>>51619302
You can't skyrocket if you use their money you dumbfuck mouthbreather, it's not stable

>>51623376
Yep. At least with biotech some of the shareholders can vote on how things are done. Instead here we basically have an ATM that the teams turns on every pump, suppressing the price

>>51623713
>duuuuuuude just wait your whole life for le segreeet investment!!!

>>51623851
>i cant refute any link criticism so ill just try to discredit people

You come across like a faggot in first year of law school.

Rejoice if you already hold Link. It will be brutal once the world wakes up and realizes. When they are just out of the blue put in front of a 'yeah, this is habbenin scenario'. 1k eoy was a low estimate.

>>51624228
Nobody is saying to do this anon. Find a faster way to make shitloads of money besides heavy speculative investment in chainlink and waiting as long as it takes

>>51624415
Indeed.

>>51624219
>At least with biotech some of the shareholders can vote on how things are done
This is absolutely typical of the sort of inflated ego that investoooooors think should be pandered to. Expertise does not scale with stake. Do you know anything about biotech? no? Then you're not helping. Shut the fuck up.

>>51624415
>besides heavy speculative investment
Since most heavy speculative investments fail, are you finally admitting that chainlink is unlikely to succeed?

>>51623851
You sound emotional, how do those -90% bags feel?

>>51624573
Have you been following developments? More likely by the day, even though the market does not show it. It will be brutal.

>>51623376
>They don't dilute as relentlessly and unceremoniously.
You are objectively retarded.

>>51619302
that was the 'pump' anons

expect sell the news all through until October, due warning

>>51624573
Does Eric schmidt typically hops on fruitless endeavors?

>>51624645
This. I am browsing /biz/ everyday until the inevitable downfall of chainlink to watch these idiots break down in despair. This board will be hilarious when chainlink dumps for the last time and I'm going to be there for it.

>>51624785
yes, he has no idea what he's doing. Got lucky that one time with google.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snMWgvMgWr4

>>51624791
I meant the opposite.
You will be in for a nightmare of a surprise, I think. No failure. But world domination. Bad for everyone on the planet really, except early link holders.
> Hey vill eat ze bugs
> Ve vill eat steak in ze citadel

>>51624828
Fair enough. I hold a 1000 LINK suicide stack just in case the schizos are right so either way I win.

>>51624846
Right on

>>51623376
Link performed when nobody was really paying attention to crypto from 2019-2020. Link is a bear market token. Guess where we're headed right now? Token Needed

>>51624795
unironically bearish af

>>51624552
>duuuuuuude just give all your money to scam biotech corporations and never expect a return. It triggers me that you call your investment an investment

Hahahahahah imagine simping for people that scam you out of your hard earned money. Fucking cuckold.

PSA to everyone…no matter what you do, DO NOT CALL YOUR DONATION TO THE LINK TEAM AN INVESTMENT!!!!!!!

You absolutely cannot expect anything in return despite the team taking one BILLION dollars from you. Why??? Because YOU JUST CANT ALRIGIT!!!!!

Signed,
The cuckolds of the board. The few, the incels, the marines.

>>51625219
> t.wagecuck hoping to buy more cheap link with his barmy pay check before it hits the stratosphere.

>>51625158
>>51625219
Put the pipe down, anon. And work on your formatting.

>>51619349
Chainlink is centralized.

>>51624846
lmao poorfag the sui stack is 10k
they might let you clean the toilet in the citadel with that baby stack

>>51625511
Chainlink is the exact opposite of centralized, which is why pic related keeps happening.

>>51624795
Eric was just being kind here.

>>51624885
Still kinda regret holding it tho

>>51624364
Stephen Prosperi is tasked with bringing Project Whitney live with 11T on private ETH based chain by 2024

What was the compliance oracle again?

>>51625650
>lmao poorfag
Says the anon who is holding a project more than 50% down from its ath. idiot. Chainlink may not ever hit $100 cause its centralized.

>>51625659
Don't mean shit. Chainlink labs hand picks the data providers for the price feeds. Shit is centralized.

>>51626212
>What was the compliance oracle again?
What was it? They can choose between a number of oracle projects that are being developed currently. Even if they pick one oracle they can always change their mind and choose another better one down the line.

>>51626306
>the anon who is holding a project more than 50% down from its ath.
curious-
what are you holding right now that isn't more than 50% down from ATH?

>Chainlink labs hand picks the data providers for the price feeds. Shit is centralized.
Do you know how Chainlink works, or what "centralized" even means?

At this point I assume you're just fudding for fun and arguing in bad faith.

>>51626565
Maybe it’s the one who’s conference their fucking lead is attending you troll

>>51626306
APl2 cuck detected

>>51626565
Nobody ever got FIRED for using a chainlink oracle.

>>51626751
I can't remember but wasn't there a project that was designed because operating a chainlink node was so difficult to do and they set out to correct all the inefficiencies of chainlink. It's name escapes me but the chainlink project definitely doesn't need to worry about competition.

>>51626837
that became api 2.25 gpa

>>51619302
2 more weeks

>>51626751
Kek

>>51619302
>IBM
LOL! IBM is boomer tech central and is headed by a jeet. The average IBM employee in the US is eligible for medicare, and anyone with actual talent goes to work for company that actually gives market rate compensation.

This board went downhill so fast after the zoomers arrived

>>51627350
This is the case sadly. Oh well at least we will be rich from Link and zoomers will be on their own once again lmao

>>51619302
Staking will be released in the next 24 hours

>>51627350
it's amazing the power of a few fud memes (TNN etc) and poor price action for the last few years filters out the next generation of bizlets (the lowest IQ gen yet)

>>51619302
endorse by google >> proof ? google chainlink and it found answers...you see it is endorse by google !!

>>51627467
100% of the time investors lock up tokens in staking they get dumped on. People never learn.

>>51627420
>Oh well at least we will be rich from Link
delusional.

>>51627878
I wonder why SWIFT and the DTCC are there

Must have been paid right?
Low level lackeys thrown out, right?

Let’s invest in ETH goys, oracles are useless and private industry would never choose to run internal distributed blockchains for efficiency amongst stakeholders with an external oracle as an arbiter of b2b, country to country, derivative settlements.

>>51628471
Oh and if they did, they would never choose Chainlink.
It’s not like the origin of the project was the SIBOS startup initiative, or even if it was, goy, they would rather use the uniswap oracle or coinbase oracle!

Why not even api3!

Stop it goy, you’re being silly

>>51619344
>genuinely interested to know why LINK is underperforming considering all that.
it's up when everything else is down, isn't that enough? It will dump massively after smartcon though.

>>51619302
>>Endorsed
just means literally they paid these people and companies for recognition. It is paid endorsement.

>>51619302
Cardano devs are buying to deploy their conracts after vasil, that is this pump.

>>51628995
Is SWIFT typically in the habit of accepting fees for endorsements? Is that their business model?

>>51628471
so is eth worthless? uh oh

>>51623076
>This is correct. Right now it simply doesn't do anything it says it will "soon." It can give me a random number and tell me how much Matic costs. That is all. There are no tokenomics at work that tell me it is worth anything. I of course believe it will, but right now, it's theoretical.

Anon, what are you arguing? Link tokens are useless? Because those are all super important functions. The Matic price feed though, it's free. It's being subsidized.

>>51627141
Understatement of the year. IBM was an obsolete boomer company when microsoft and apple were coming alive in the 90s. The FUCK are they gonna help link with? Maybe they’ll bring in some fax machines into muhhh oracle network.

>>51627350
> duuuuuuuude we used to le epic research here!!!!
>Its YOUR fault that the link team cant deliver a test version of its main feature in 5 years because you arent posting enough bredddddkrumbbzzzz on the fishing forum

Yikes

>>51629699
You know ibm bought red hat?

>>51627872
>sinking in quicksand, 90% of body covered by the sand. Still convinced its a genius for standing there

The last moments of the dying cult member

>>51628587
WOW 3%!!!!! Incredible. Man you guys werent lying about this being a bear market coin. Now its only down 89% instead of 91…HODL MARINES!!!!

>>51629733
Oh WOW!!! You dont happen to have an INFOGRAPHIC on that do you!????

Sometimes when Im feeling low, I pull up various INFOGRAPHICS during my secret breadcrumb research. Nothing in the world better than rare INFOGRAPHICS, am I rig—ACK

>four separate posts in a row

>five

>>51619344
sergey dumps

>>51629096
Wake up dumbass
Nobody in enterprise cares about a DLT that is run by the public

They want internal stakeholders running PoS chains to optimize speed and validation, but to truly trust each other in these consortiums will need to have the data layer be an external arbiter of closed system contract execution

Let me know if you processed 1% of that

>>51628077
Checked

>>51620407
>dude they’re just pricing Chainlink based on what it does right now and even though literally everything in else in crypto is priced purely based on speculation the market is obviously not doing this for Chainlink and is applying extreme rigour in evaluating Chainlink as an investment
I actually fud Chainlink pretty often, but this take is one I find so fucking retarded.

The gpt4chan heroku bot threads are my favorite content generators, even better than the marketing persona tripfags, especially when they use memes they think provoke an emotional reaction from their target reader

Token not needed

>>51624110
If not taken seriously, them why invest in it? The entire world economy is in the negative and so is the crypto space. Despite the downturn in crypto there are still a number of projects like privacy, identity management, data management and all that are successfully lowering the entry barrier for crypto to gain widespread adoption.

>>51621880
Eric holder lied

>>51619786
>erc-20
WRONG!
>non-needed
SAD!

>>51629778
>>51629810
unhinged tranny bleeding from its axe wound lmao

>>51619442
But the token still depends on ETH functioning to be moved around, no? And if the gov wants to they can shut down every single validator with a gag order or simply print money to buy a majority of ETH. This is legitimately my only concern, given that ETH is POS now. Also, how are smart contracts trustless now that you have to trust Coinbase not to censor a tx made by a contract?
I’m 80% in LINK btw so fuck off with the muh concern fudder and answer the questions niggers

>>51629726
This kek

>team owes you nothing!

You’re right, that’s also the reason why they don’t deliver on anything. Thanks for playing

>>51635113
>And if the gov wants to they can shut down every single validator with a gag order
impossible
>simply print money to buy a majority of ETH.
slashing
>Also, how are smart contracts trustless now that you have to trust Coinbase not to censor a tx made by a contract?
slashing

>>51619344
Purposeful price suppression so industry players can shuffle in at their own pace, nice and easy, the cattle climb into the thousand head wide culling machine all on their own. Chainlink labs has one goal, and it's total domination over public information flow. To get that, they're aggressively pulling every institution they can in, even if just baby toe deep. They're going for breadth, not depth. They want every bit of market share before anyone even realizes there's a market. By the time the old behemoths realize what's happening, it's already over. They'll all have guns to each other's head and an explosive collar around their necks. If they don't pull the trigger, their collar goes off.

>>51635719
Yes its obviously a conspiracy and totally not related to the fact that there is no buying pressure on link because the entire network is mostly subsidized by Sergey and there is no staking so no reason for anyone to buy/hold link.

>>51635740
he got us boys let's pack it up now

>>51635787
He le secret tranny bulgarian fudder am I right?

>>51635740
Do you know what a conspiracy is? They just pay to fud their own token and they very strictly avoid unnecessarily talking up the price. That's not a conspiracy, it's submarine tactics. They don't depend on anyone outside the core team to keep secrets, and really they don't have to keep secrets at all. I mean, I'm sitting here telling you the whole truth, yet almost nobody will believe it despite them not being all that careful about hiding what they're doing. They don't care if you or anyone else knows because it's hard to believe they could ever pull it off.

>>51635838
>I'm sitting here telling you the whole truth
problem is, you can't possibly know the truth, you're just projecting your bullish speculation thesis, unless you're claiming to be inside her

>>51635838
Oh someone definitely pays for this submarine operation and that is the linkholder. Through absorbing sergeys weekly dumps, which has raised over a billion (!!!). And all they have done is released a data aggregator. All part of the plan yes?

>>51635856
The truth is that they have not pumped the price on purpose, ever. They have aggressively pursued integration with major market players in finance and subsidized onboarding them, knowing full well this would suppress the price. They have hired people who have experience with running a submarine business. My only speculation is that they paid to fud LINK, and I admit they might not have done this simply because it might not have been necessary.
If all these facts come off as bullish to you, it's not my interpretation, it's yours. I never implied any of this was bullish.

>>51635939
Ok so show me the on chain evidence of these so called major players in finance? Lmao

>>51635922
Oh yes, holders suffered for this. They don't actually care about holders at all and will gladly push the price down for many more years if deemed necessary.

>>51635948
How about you show me the on chain evidence that they're not using it.

>>51635959
You made the claim major finance institutions are on board and its up to you to prove this.

>>51635794
Oof you are so fucking bitter. >>51623460
How much are you down? How much more can you take before you rope?

>>51635948
Yeah sure, I'll just search for wallets with institution names written on them because that's something they'd do. We've known about swift for years yet you tards keep pretending it's not real

>>51635968
>too retarded to check IDs

>>51636026
dude imagine if Rory included rope in the Official 2022 SmartCon Swag lmao

>>51636039
Yes you better do because right now you’re claim is not supported by any evidence. Talks =/= actual usage

>>51636049
I never said actual usage. I said market share. It's still beta technology which isn't ready for the majority of real world applications. That doesn't mean no integration has happened. This is a brain dead simple, core rule of business: Get your foot in the door.
Try attacking me next time, not a straw man.

>>51635939
the truth is that everything you just typed is speculation and conjecture, and you are heavily implying you're bullish
so you are a pretentious, disingenuous, condescending pseud

>>51636218
Okay lol, have fun believing that

>>51636243
sure

>>51626306
>Don't mean shit.
lmao, read the image. It's literally centralized vs decentralized.

>Chainlink labs hand picks the data providers for the price feeds.
Because the price feeds are their contracts.
The contracts are controlled by the contract operator; the underlying oracle network is decentralized.

>>51636419
>the underlying oracle network is decentralized.
how is the underlying network decentralized when every participant is whitelisted, KYC'd and approved by the team?? that's the opposite of decentralization nigger

>>51636448
Their identities being known and verified changes literally NOTHING about the fact that they are independent actors.
We know the identities of the miners that make up the absolute vast majority of BTC and ETH miners too, so according to you they're not decentralized.

According to your dumbass logic, nothing can ever be decentralized since literally everyone alive on earth today is known by name.

>>51636498
>hurr lemme pretend decentralization = anonymity
are you dumb? can you mine BTC independently right now? yes you fucking can
can you join the chainlink network without being whitelisted? no
centralization means a central point of authority, it has nothing to do with anonymity

>>51636535
>>hurr lemme pretend decentralization = anonymity
That's what you're saying.

>can you mine BTC independently right now? yes you fucking can
You can set up a Chainlink oracle right now too.
You just won't be included in the price feeds.

>can you join the chainlink network without being whitelisted? no
Literally yes.
Stop posting.

>>51619349
>>51619302
I am retail. Could you please explain to me why Chainlink is better than BTC, for example? As in, what can you do with it, not the technical stuff itself, but the consequences of the technical stuff.

>>51636568
>Could you please explain to me why Chainlink is better than BTC

>>51636556
no, I'm saying they're whitelisted and KYC, it's a fact, dunno why you got triggered so hard by KYC specifically kek
>You can set up a Chainlink oracle right now too
NODES, retard, NODES
can you setup a node right now without being whitelisted? go on and do it retard
>literally yes
shitty linkpool nodes don't count you massive moron, there are only 27 official nodes and that's it
decentralization my ass

>>51636589
>no, I'm saying they're whitelisted and KYC, it's a fact
For the price feeds, yes.
The contract operator gets to choose how strict the requirements for node admission are for his contract.

>NODES, retard, NODES
Oracles are nodes.

>there are only 27 official nodes and that's it
There are 319.

Arguing with you feels like I'm beating up a toddler.

>>51636616
>hurr durr durr hurrr they're only whitelisted for the major functionality and profitable job in the network, you can do anything else without KYC!!
my god, how fucking dumb are you
>shitty linkpool nodes don't count
>proceeds to list them anyway hoping no one will notice
>Arguing with you feels like I'm beating up a toddler
the fucking irony bruh, you are possibly the most retarded poster on this board, thinking your silly childish fallacies will win you the argument lmao

>>51636579
i have no idea what that means.

>>51636658
>they're only whitelisted for the major functionality and profitable job in the network
The entire point of decentralized oracles is they compete with each other for the top jobs.
That's their motivation to stake as much as possible, and to perform as well as possible.

Holy fucking shit you're stupid.

>>shitty linkpool nodes don't count
Nobody's talking about linkpool.

>>51636658
>I deserve a high-ranking job just because I exist
The fuck outta here, commie

>>51636694
the entire point of decentralization is no central authority, no single point of failure you imbecile
you are talking about linkpool when you bring up 300+ nodes you retard, the official nodes are less than 30, shut the fuck up with your blatant disinfo
>>51636720
holy projection, cultists are really deranged resorting to nonsensical ad homs
where did I imply anything like that you retarded bagholder? try disputing the fucking argument next time

>>51636753
>the entire point of decentralization is no central authority
There is no central authority for the NETWORK.
Each and every individual contract however is obviously centralized.

>you are talking about linkpool when you bring up 300+ nodes you retard
No, I'm not.

>>51636692
Chainlink opens up the blockchain to real-world data, which enables use cases that far exceed anything blockchain has done so far.
Therefore Chainlink may outgrow Bitcoin in value.
t. Citibank

>>51636777
there is, it's called CHAINLINK LABS
rekt
>hurr no I'm not!!!
then WHERE THE FUCK did you came up with that number you moron?

>>51636753
> where did I imply anything like that
When you said you need to be whitelisted for the major jobs in the network.

https://www.ens.vision/name/sergeyfat

>>51636799
that's a fact, not my own thesis you illiterate monkey

>>51619302
>implying being supported by globohomo is a good thing

>>51636803
Your thesis is you deserve to have one of those jobs simply because you exist.

>>51636813
>hurrr lemme project shit nao lmao lelele
no, my thesis is your shitty network is centralized

>>51636777
Checked
>>51636692
Then it looks like you’re part of the brain dead retail horde that needs scmidt to spell it out for you. You’re in luck.

>>51636793
>there is, it's called CHAINLINK LABS
You can run a node without Chainlink Labs even knowing of it.
The code is up for grabs.

>then WHERE THE FUCK did you came up with that number you moron?
Market.link
You can scroll down the list of nodes yourself.

>>51636799
Don’t waste your energy on these idiots man. By far the biggest laughing stock in crypto

>>51636824
>You can run a node without Chainlink Labs even knowing of it.
yeah but without approval from the team it will be a ghost town, minor detail, I know
>Market.link
that''s UNOFFICIAL LINKPOOL METRICS YOU RETARD, you don't even KNOW YOUR OWN FUCKING PROJECT

>>51636819
It’s centralized because they won’t give you a high-ranking job just for existing.
Set up your own custom DON.

>>51636836
>yeah but without approval from the team it will be a ghost town
Says fucking who?
Market your shit.

>that''s UNOFFICIAL LINKPOOL METRICS YOU RETARD
Scroll down the list, bucky boy.
You cry about nodes being KYC'd, but then you're too retarded to even check their identities.

>>51636838
it's centralized because the functionality and maintenance of the network depends solely on Chainlink Labs, and because you can't participate FREELY in the network, like you could with BTC and ETH, at least in the early days before heavy miner centralization
but sure, keep moving the goalposts

>>51636854
>Says fucking who?
the team themsevles? are you retarded? holy fucking shit am I being baited all this time?
>Scroll down the list, bucky boy.
I told you from the start, THESE ARE WORTHLESS LINKPOOL NODES incorporated on LINKPOOL, they're not independent official nodes

>>51636869
>the team themsevles?
Source pls

>THESE ARE WORTHLESS LINKPOOL NODES incorporated on LINKPOOL
They are nodes contributing directly to feeds, keepers, vrf, ...

>>51636855
>it’s centralized because you can't participate FREELY in the network
Of course you can.
You just can’t get a high-ranking job simply because you exist.
You’ll have to build a reputation and eventually stake to get that.

>>51636919
Do you think the top nodes built their reputation from the ground? No they got KYC’d by Sergey himself retard

>>51636942
> Do you think the top nodes built their reputation from the ground?
They typically had histories providing mining, development, auditing, … services before joining Chainlink.

>>51636967
Jfc, look at this goalpost shifting retard

>>51636985
Not a single goalpost was moved.

>>51636942
>>51636985
"Reputation" doesn't necessarily mean as a Chainlink node lmao.
Look up what a catch 22 is.

>>51637019
So everyone who wants to start a node must first suck sergeys dick before they get to run price feeds, that’s literally what you are implying. Unlike eth/btc where literally everyone can start a node. Jfc you linkies are helpless. Makes sense though, no other group of people would accept Sergeys relentless dumps on you retards

>>51636942
This has been discussed countless times before both on this board and in the documents put forward by Chainlink. Bootstrapping a trustless network by making use of companies' existing reputation allows the network to grow out of the initial stages rapidly, without the risk of having nodes screw over the network when it is advantageous for them to do so (when an exploit is found for example). This decreases decentralization yes, but speeds up the early stages of the network considerably, after which the network should open up to non handpicked nodes.

>inb4 lmao @ ur life for believing them it will be KYC nodes forever!!
Sure, if that's your line of thinking then don't invest.

>dca
0.32
>current price
7.70

Cant complain

>>51637071
oh so someone finally conceded to the fact of centralization and KYC'd, cause you "have to bootstrap the network!!!"
you just destroyed the narrative of the shills itt congrats!

>>51637283
>you just destroyed the narrative of the shills itt congrats!
If you dolts would actually read the whitepaper you would save yourselves a lot of embarrassment not to mention precious hours of your time.
>conceded to the fact of centralization and KYC'd, cause you "have to bootstrap the network!!!"
You act like this is somehow a huge negative for Chainlink. Why? Do you think a network without punitive measures in place could function with non KYC'd nodes?

>>51637429
lmao you just pivoted from
>wdy it's centralized? the NODES are independent!!
>kyc?? no you don't aksually need that bro!!!
to
>here's why centralization is a good thing!!!
>yeah, it might not be decentralized yet but read da whitepaper!!!
kek, you baggies are absolutely hilarious

>>51637429
To add to this, if Chainlink were to open up to NEET nodes at this moment, without staking, slashing or node reputation in place, what actually incentives nodes to act honest? Game theory dictates that nodes WILL misbehave and the network would immediately fail, which is a death sentence for a system that aims to take away trust. It would be dead in the water.

But oh no, muh neet nodes, Sergey betrayed us! You imbeciles are literally too stupid to think 2 steps ahead while gigabrains like Ari are designing a network that has to anticipate and withstand literally every angle of attack that can ever be conceived for the network to survive the first few years.

>>51637476
>lmao you just pivoted from
No I did not. We have ids on this board, use them 24 pbtid anon. Like I said, this board would be a lot less tedious if faggots like you invested their time in actually reading up on the network instead of endlessly bickering about it without having any basis in its theory whatsoever.

>>51637054
>So everyone who wants to start a node must first suck sergeys dick
No, everyone who wants to be a part of Sergey's contracts.

That's the whole point of decentralized oracles: they all fight and compete among themselves to have the best reputation, the longest uptime, the fewest failures, the highest amount staked, ... in order to get the best jobs.

>>51619302
it's very simple they don't want to make us rich, they hate us and would rather die than see us succeed but too bad because many of us already made bank on link lmao

>>51636855
>you can't participate FREELY in the network, like you could with BTC and ETH, at least in the early days before heavy miner centralization
this is very core to chainlink fud, it either lies outright or arbitrarily holds link to a higher standard than everything else.
i know you hold link you snake fucking faggot.

>>51637540
>enters a thread where people are arguing for more than 30 posts whether chainlink is decentralized or no
>hurr check idz!!11
>>51637766
the fuck do you mean moron? using the exact same standards across the industry, you can safely deduct it's centralized, end of story
the only people talking about muh different standards are bagholding morons like you with
>but what about muh ETH???
fuck off with your endless mental gymnastics

>>51637785
>>but what about muh ETH???
That's exactly his point lel
Here you are crying about Chainlink being centralized, while your logic makes ETH and BTC centralized as well.

Fudders love to hold Link to a completely insane double standard.
It's pretty much the only way you can even fud Link anymore.

>>51637819
>Here you are crying about Chainlink being centralized, while your logic makes ETH and BTC centralized as well.
thanks for immediately proving my point
>bro, u know, chainlink is centralized
>b-b-but WHAT ABOUT MUH BTC/ETH???
excellent retort lmao

>>51637834
The only way you can even attack Chainlink anymore, is by attacking all of crypto.

>>51637849
no, you can just attack their claims
>it's decentralized!!
it's provably not
keep moving the goalposts, bitchboy

>>51637860
>it's provably not
If Chainlink isn't decentralized, then neither is ETH, BTC, ...

>27 posts by this ID

>>51637871
>le slippery slope fallacy
stick it up your ass, baggie, either come up with an argument which explains how chailank is decentralized or shut the fuck up
>>51637876
>stop talking about LINK!!!!1

>>51637882
That's not a slippery slope fallacy, that's simply a double standard.

>>51637894
>I have zero arguments because it is centralized, so I'm going to resort to semantics
ok, thanks for conceding, have fun waiting for le bootstrap to end

Why does every big link thread have a seething 50pbtid wackjob who spends days refreshing it endlessly

>>51637904
It's not semantics either, it's a double standard.

>>51637908
>it is centralized, I concede
I know anon, you can stop posting now

>>51637912
It's only centralized if you think ETH and BTC are also centralized.

>>51637919
>accept my premises which introduce a cherry picked comparison so I can win the argument
>aka loaded question fallacy
kek, this meltdown is hilarious

>>51637938
>cherry picked
BTC and ETH are the number 1 and 2 paragons of decentralization.

>>51637947
good, BTC and ETH are decentralized, LINK is not
cope seethe and dial8

>>51637957
>BTC and ETH are decentralized
That's not what you said earlier: >>51636855

>>51637907
gpt4chan bots
domo arigato mr heroku

>>51637973
sure, but the miner hashrate concetration does not make it less decentralized than LINK
LINK's network is COMPLETELY PERMISSIONED, it's not even remotely comparable, plus BTC lost 60% of the hashrate back in 2021, it's still alive and kicking, that is the DEFINITION of decentralization (not a single point of failure)
tl;dr cope seethe and dial8 once more

>>51637996
>but the miner hashrate concetration does not make it less decentralized than LINK
Why did you put "but" in the beginning? Are you esl?

>LINK's network is COMPLETELY PERMISSIONED
The feed contracts are.
You can set up your own network of nodes right now if you want.

>>51637975
this one isn't a bot but a nasty pilpul faggot having one hell of a rosh hashanah

>>51638021
first sentence was sure you imbecile
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/subjects/writing/is-it-ever-okay-to-start-a-sentence-with-the-word-but
>The feed contracts are
that's the only useful thing the LINK network has, how can you be this dense? the other features do not generate revenue AT ALL

>>51638026
their arguments are dumb. both of them are bots

>>51638035
>first sentence was sure you imbecile
>https://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/subjects/writing/is-it-ever-okay-to-start-a-sentence-with-the-word-but

Anon, you were agreeing yet you said "but".
You only use "but" when contradicting.

>that's the only useful thing the LINK network has
There go the goalposts.
Also, you aren't simply entitled to join whatever contract you want. The whole point of Chainlink is to have nodes compete for the best jobs. So compete.

>>51638042
okay, let's unpack this
assuming I'm a bot, it would be plausible for someone who accumulates to employ bots to spread FUD, right?
now on the opposite end, why would someone deploy a bot that can't argue in favor of LINK? what's the motive here?
>>51638061
yeah, I was agreeing with my own post you quoted here>>51636855
but I disagreed with your conclusions, are you retarded?
>there go the goalposts
you ought to know about that, you've been doing nothing itt except swapping ids and moving the goalposts all the time
bottom line is, LINK is entirely centralized cause they "bootstrap le network"!!1
seethe harder shill

>>51638086
>but I disagreed with your conclusions
You said "but BTC and ETH aren't less decentralized than Chainlink".
You were agreeing.

>bottom line is, LINK is entirely centralized
Your only proof of this is that Sergey's contracts are permissioned.
You're supposed to compete with other oracles for the best contracts.

>>51638106
dear god, the other bagholder is right, YOU ARE A FUCKING BOT lmao
sorry buddy, LINK is centralized, you can cope all you want with muh BTC and ETH, it won't change reality

ps literally dumping rn

>>51638122
>is upset he has to compete with other oracles for the best jobs
>CHAINLINK IS CENTRALIZED RRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE (and so are BTC and ETH btw)

>>51638136
>le compete with other oracles
ok, show me one node that got out competed and went out of business? what's that? every node is being subsidized so competition doesn't even exist? oh too bad

>>51638163
>show me one node that got out competed and went out of business?
Yours apparently.

>every node is being subsidized
That's a funny way of saying "getting paid by the contract operator for doing their job".

>>51638174
so you can't even show me one instance of the network functioning as you've outlined?
ahahahahahaah lmao
>no reputation
>no staking
>no slashing
>but dude, they are cOmPeTiNg!!!!
lmao dude, it's just embarrassing at this point

>>51638194
>so you can't even show me one instance of the network functioning as you've outlined?
Sure I can: your node isn't part of the price feeds.

>>51638206
it never was cause "my node" doesn't exist!
kek, so only ad homs from now on? thanks for conceding once again!
btfo

>>51638218
>it never was cause "my node" doesn't exist!
Then why did you just spend the last few hours complaining how you can't be part of the feed contracts?

>>51638086
>two bots having the same discussion over and over again

>>51638218
>so only ad homs from now on?
go back to plebbit the only reason you feel like you've won anything is that we haven't downvoted you

>>51638229
kek, I never complained about that you massive retard, I'm only saying it's centralized and whoever claims otherwise is blatantly lying
>>51638257
>(((we)))
go back to r*ddit yourself you gaslighting prick

>>51638272
>I never complained about that
Your entire argument is that Chainlink is centralized because you can't join without being whitelisted as a node.

>>51638272
>41 posts
>27 hours

>>51638306
not me in particular you dense retard
your desperate attempts to move the goalposts are hilarious
let's get to the main argument once more
chainlink is a centralized, permissioned network
unless you try to refute that, I won't be responding to your shitty bait posts anymore
>>51638355
so?

>>51638376
I hope you have at least 50k link, no one should be seething this hard with any less than that

>>51638400
>le "fudders" are holders!!1
whatever makes you sleep at night

>>51638490
Why else would you care about Link WAAAY more than me, an actual holder?

>>51638523
because I have a lot of free time and your delusional shitposting is obnoxious
cope harder

>>51638490
Holding link down 85% is the only explanation for you acting so emotional for almost 30 hours

>>51638559
>I have a lot of free time
Which you spend on Chainlink specifically.

Two days before SmartCon and THIS is supposed to be a link thread? Honest guys this is ducking pathetic it’s not even remotely funny anymore

>>51619349
The BTC dumps work because of the “stacking sats” psyop that has permeated crypto. It allows government entities to control all of crypto by dumping Bitcoin. Anyone who fell for stacking sats is a detriment to the crypto market and i hate them.

>>51638570
>>51638577
Chainlink is a centralized network
any arguments against that fellas?

>>51638582
Because there's nothing to talk about LINK anymore. We're all just sitting on the sidelines waiting for these retards to fuck it up for good this time. The 44pbtid poster is right, LINK is doomed.

>>51638586
Honestly buddy I think it might be time to kill yourself

>>51638603
you first baggie

>>51638603
So you admit you have no arguments for what that poster is saying.

>>51638592
Lol no it isn’t you’re either retarded or a sicko fudder it’s that simple
When link finally starts the adoption run it’s going to be fucking embarrassing for this board how will you even mrgyncope

>>51638614
He’s a mentally ill tranny what argument is even necessary

>>51638592
>there’s nothing to talk about Link anymore

>>51638614
>p-pls continue to argue

These were posted by the same person

>>51638649
You've been waiting for five fucking years and nothing has happened, no-one has made it off link and most of you pathetic fucks are still waging. Meanwhile BTC and ETH had explosive runs which minted millionaires very rapidly. Chainlink will never ever have that, and actual adoption of it will only happen 10-15 years down the line which is way too long to wait.

>>51638662
kek, LINK is centralized baggie
any arguments against that?

>>51638586
It may well be, I have not said anything to contradict that

>>51638715
that's my entire argument! thanks for conceding and kindly fuck off to a more bullish thread for your bags!

>>51638669
I’ve been holding since 2018 and I’ve made more money than I ever thought possible, I’m functionally retired and will soon be paid to stake link, you and your ink in this thread are the bottom feeding scum eels of crypto trying to hurt other people’s belief in this project, you will get what you deserve soon enough

>>51638737
Based. The only poster here that makes any sense. Keep redpilling the masses and make another thread about chainlink when this thread hits bump limit. Plaster the board with FUD before smartcon as the price craters.

>>51638737
I haven't been arguing against you, I was merely expressing concern for your mental wellbeing

>>51638758
If chainlink was actually a decent project then our posts could be easily ignored. Maybe there are some legitimate doubts about it which is why the FUD bothers you so much. You are uncertain and fearful of the future of LINK, aren't you?

>>51638758
the only thing that hurts the people's belief in this project is the team themselves
imagine unironically getting affected by anonymous shitposts
>>51638778
>I'm here to insult your character not your arguments
yeah, it's a common tactic when you have no arguments whatsoever

>>51638801
> imagine unironically getting affected by anonymous shitposts
So why even post like this?

>>51638769
Imagine if link actually succeeds (it will) how will you look at yourself in the mirror
Imagine being this much of a faggot it’s almost beyond my understanding how you losers continue to seethe day in day out in EVERY SINGLE LINK THREAD posted for YEARS what the fuck is wrong with you I’m at a loss for words here

>>51619524
XRP, XLM, XDC, hbar are all tied to massive companies, banks and governments. Except for the last week these are all doing shit. Almost like they don't want the public to buy them.

>>51638823
>you're not allowed to state your opinion if it's negative!!11
ohh sorry I didn't know kek

>>51638800
It is a decent project and I will now go back to easily ignoring your pathetic faggot posts I’m currently holidaying in Tuscany on Sergey’s dime with a hot piece of ass drinking Camparis enjoy your thread you fucking gay weirdo sociopaths

>>51638875
>50 posts over 28 hours
>”I’m just stating my opinion!”

>>51638880
And I'm in Thailand fucking femboys from the cash I made from shorting LINK. Fuck you.

>>51638880
>seething in vacations cause anonymous randoms fud his bags
KEK, you literally can't make this shit up

>>51638909
yes! should I ignore the trolls is your point? I enjoy destroying your retarded arguments though, is that so bad? can't we have some fun here?
anyway, LINK is centralized it seems, any arguments against that? no?

>>51638917
You’re by far the biggest seether itt

>>51638990
nah it's this guy in vacations lmao
>>51638880
>It is a decent project and I will now go back to easily ignoring your pathetic faggot posts I’m currently holidaying in Tuscany on Sergey’s dime with a hot piece of ass drinking Camparis enjoy your thread you fucking gay weirdo sociopaths
completely unhinged
and followed closely by (You), keep counting my posts baggie, that will show me!

>>51636568
Chainlink, links chains. It’s token is used as a cryptocurrency, which is to purchase goods and services. But not in the traditional sense.

how much do i need to hold of this coin to feed my village sirs?

such malice ITT
many wow

why can't nobody tell me how much link i should have for the upcoming bullrun

>>51639777
checked you have your answer 777 is all you need

>>51621856
well I'm rubber so whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you

>>51639777
>>51639922
>>51639966
CHECKED HOLY SHIT WE ARE ALL GOING TO MAKE IT OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>51619302
>never heard of Link Milkshake Theory

>>51639777
Checked, 777 LINK to make it.

>>51639922
nice, i might be able to get 77. i hope the elders will be happy with me