/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51606726
To outbreed blacks

>>51606726
Jannies, just go ahead and delete this before the pedos start slinking their way into the thread.

Rolling.

>>51606780
You get the fetus, congrats!

>>51606744
>trannoid cannot look at children without having groomer thoughts

Imagine

>all females
fuck, that's cruel

nvm there seems to be 1 fella, still thats 8 daughters and 8 too many

>>51606726

>>51606726
Why are those numbers so retarded.
It should be 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
not 6, 2,5,6,7,10,10,11, 12
talk about dropping the ball

>>51606836
those are men

>>51607135

>>51606849
are you blind? 3 boys

you dont need a high salary to raise kids retard

>>51606984
cancer autist nigger

>>51606780
Rollerino

>>51606726
You need a white woman faggot and it's not available anymore.

>>51606726
whenever I see white families with more than 2 kids I just assume they are ultra racists

>>51606726
When raising a large family it's actually worth it to have your parents live with you because they can give help and attention. Your wife is going to be busy as fuck and you will be too unless you inherited a lot of money because that's a lot of mouths to feed, bodies to clothe, tutors to hire, hobbies to pay for, birthday and holiday presents to buy, etc. I don't even know what kind of car you'd use to drive that many kids around. If I had to take care of that many kids I'd definitely look into getting a nanny to help.

>>51606726
Unironical kids aren't that expensive. You can pass clothes and toys down to the next. Only saving for university could be an challenge if you have 8. I think a social support net helps tremendously (parents looking after the kids while you go with one to the Docter etc.). When the kids are older they can help with chores or babysitting

>>51607204
You have to provide them place to sleep and live, and housing is fuckin expensive.
Food, meds and school cost too. Then you have hobbies / allowance.
And in worst case scenario they might turn out to be slobs who will never work a single day in their life, living off of your paycheck for the rest of your life because you don't have enough strength to kick them out.
And as a male you can always be divorced and be forced to pay alimony.

Personally I think I'll stick with putting my money into stock market. It's still much cheaper even when I'm down 20% YTD due to bear marekt.

>>51607204
I wonder if there's a term for it but as civilisation progresses the amount of resources needed for each kid increase exponentially, of course in the caveman times if you could scavenge some berries, roots and a dead rat once a week then you could have a dozen kids and not give a shit, nowadays you can have ten thousand dollars, unimaginable wealth for previous generations, central heating, plumbing, modern healthcare, literally the knowledge of humanity at your fingertips on computers and be still like "having a kid? nah man I just can't afford it"

>>51607204
multigenerational households are how we've raised kids for tens of thousands of years, the nuclear family is a complete sham and forces us to do insane things to make up for social communities that are necessary for raising kids

>>51606726
If I had a gf who looked like her I’d breed her that much too god DAMN I love white women.

>>51606818
Kek

>>51606726
>didn't stop at twin boys, all children within 3 years age.
Based beyond belief.

>>51606726
You get into economies of scale realistically. The tenth kid is going to be much cheaper than the first. They become self-aware too, they can actually take care of most of the associated labor for their siblings once the oldest ones start getting normal intelligence levels.

>>51606818
>>51606836
>>51607414
there is not single woman in that picture

>>51607172
This.
All of our grandmas and great grandmas had 7-10 kids.
You decide if you want kids or not, thats it.
Most of you clearly don't. You'd rather watch tv. Therefor you place freetime higher than raising a family.
It's not rocket science. YOU made that choice.

>>51607391
meh not entirely, there's always been 3 aspects to human society, agriculture, military and trade, people working in agriculture formed communes in which the entire commune was responsible for raising kids, soldiers earned good money working for the military and they could afford to have a single family home, usually with servants, merchants earned good money too so they could also afford to live as a single family, of course being a soldier or a merchant carries much higher risks than being a farmer but the rewards are much higher too
a society can be tilted in aspect or another, leading them to be called "communist" "fascist" or "capitalist" but all 3 will always be present in each society, nowadays though the world greatly tilted in the favor of trade, so the way that merchants live gets forced on everyone which can be painful for cultures and societies in regions that were more tilted towards communal lifestyles or military lifestyles

>get farm
>make kids work
>free labour + biological imperative fulfilled

yeah im gonna roll

>>51606836
Are you blind?

>>51606780
jesus christ biz...

>>51606726
12>5>7

>>51607391
The nuclear family encourages high mobility and economic growth as the man just needs to bring his wife and kids as opposed to also including his parents and extended family. In addition, this led to the ability to take on trades and crafts that weren't handed down within your family, they called these guys moving into new fields journey men. So don't knock it bro. Both the clan based and nuclear based family styles have their advantages and disadvantages.

>>51607187
ur gay kek

>>51606726
I grew up with 8 other siblings. Big salary helps but you can honestly offset that with welfare very easily these days, and working a side hustle under the table. It can work in basically any country as long as they don't have a ban on homeschooling (so no france or germany). Staying near grandparents is a huge help for watching the kids, but as the kids get older you can trick them into watching the younger kids for you, too. Handmedowns are great, and you'll want the mother to stay at home cooking meals (saves tons of money) (also she's not out "working" spending more money than she makes) and educating the children. Get bunk beds and you can comfortably get 4 kids to a bedroom, and with trundle beds you can get 1-2 more depending on the room size. So it's very easy to get 4 kids in a 2br apartment, or 8-10 in a 3bbr apartment/house.

>>51607148
7 girls.

>>51606726
>low tax high income country
This is good. Essentially you want to provide them opportunities. Good schools, "play money" for their own little projects, hire additional private tutors if necessary. You also want your family to participate in like-minded communities. That all costs money.
Some of your kids will later add to the family's wealth and social networks, making it stronger and provide it with more options.

The welfare path leads perhaps to many kids, but they all have uphill battles to fight later in life and most won't succeed. Upward social mobility already is hard, starting from the financial, social, and educational bottom makes it only harder.

>>51606726
I wonder how much their total annual income is to support a family of this size is. Also god dam she must look like an Arby's sandwich down there.

this thread is very 1 dimensional
of course you can 'raise' 10 kids being dirt poor and feed them goy slop or whatever. the world is not even close to how it was in 50's but that isn't the point. raising kids means giving them attention, guiding them to grow physically (food, exercise), mentally (problem solving, critical thinking), emotionally (introspective, empathy), and socially (play, networking).
there is a clear line between pumping out 10 kids and not giving a fuck about anything else and actually having time to raise kids in meaningful way.

>>51607925
One full time stay at home parent and a grandparent nearby for occasional babysitting is more than enough to give kids enough attention. Especially if you homeschool, and if you join a homeschooling group with other large families it gets even easier. So many kids for social interactions.

>>51607994
its maybe just enough for 1-3 kids max, not a chance for 8-10. they will become neglected in some way or another. its bad enough with just 1 kid for most parents.
the wife nurtures the kids, takes care of their basic needs, teaches basic skills and some entertainment etc. guiding should come from the father and it require good amount of attention and time.
outside of that you need to trust the judgement of every group they interact with that isn't your direct family, and this becomes more problematic in the current day.

>>51606818
Took's Law

>>51608035
I grew up with 8 siblings in the lifestyle I described. It was fine. Nobody was neglected. Children don't need 24/7 100% of an adult's attention. It's fine to just keep an eye on them while they run around outside screaming for hours at a time. Even infants sleep hours and hours every day.

>>51606726
Damn that bitch hit the wall at 11. YIKES

>>51608134
oh right you are the anon that advocated for living in squalor
look, if you want people to live like bugmen then whatever. easier to adapt to the pod life i guess

and i don't know how old you are but you need to think how different the world is from the time you were growing up. in times gone by, the difference in culture and tech was minimal. you didn't have to check if kids were accessing social media even 15 years ago. you don't keep check and the state will gets it claws into your kids.

>>51608182
Not squalor, we had a nice house and a yard, we just didn't go on tons of vacations or buy brand name clothing or eat out daily. As for social media, that's why you don't give the kids electronics and you homeschool them.

Dubs for 12

>>51608216
>just homeschool and everything will be fine
whatever m8, homeschool is a must regardless of how many kids you have today, but it only solves part of the problem. you seem ignorant to the perils that todays children face (and will face in the future) or at least seem 'blissfully' optimistic that 'everything is fine'.
>not squalor
considering that you advocated for having 8-10 kids in a 3br apartment im not quite sure what your idea of a nice house is.
and you did advocate for squalor in that post.

>>51607336
>allowance
Lol, lmao

>>51606726


The Americans aren't going to like this picture.

Abandon thread before they wake up and spam anti-White nonsense.

>>51606726
Let's break down your question
>Other than having a big salary, what do you need for raising many kids?

Well, salary is actually 50% of what makes a good family, if you have no money start accumulating on memecoins (VINU is doing hot right now with the recent listing) and then buy more serious coins for the long term effect.

>Is it better to move to a welfare oriented country or to a low tax high income country?

Low tax high income. Not only does it help you build a financial structure around your own work, if your wife works then you get far more money to work with, also doesn't hurt to teach the kids about real economics

>Or is staying near the grandparents the best financial strategy?

No. Just no. Depends on the grandparents of course but mine are a pain in the ass so i wouldn't even bother.

>>51606737
this. Whites are waking up and dis placing blacks.

>>51608404
good.

If you have too many kids, then it's hard to focus on them because they'll just get influenced by other people

>>51606726
Imagine breeding them all at the same time

>>51606737
Fpbp and based

>>51606726
Holy fuck, her husbands name is Gonzales. None of those kids are truly white.

>>51608819
Italians ain't white?

>>51606726
Time is more important than money

>>51608135
Many such cases

>>51606726
>oldest children are girls
F

>>51606726
Kill, kill, fuck, marry, kill, fuck, kill, kill, fuck, marry

white people having big families should be considered terrorism, imagine being a person of colour when this family moves into the street, horrifying

>>51608921
That's white supremacy yes.
We can only hope her husband isn't white

>>51608832
The flag in her bio shows Uruguay. So, no.

>>51607336
>allowance
you don't give them neetbucks you retard, you put them to work

>>51607367
just because you can afford newest iphone and and basedbean goyfeed, it doesn't make you wealthier than a caveman

>>51606737
nobody asked

>>51608134
Sounds like a good life. Don't listen to that other anon

>>51607570
and from 1800 till 1960 those people that moved into craft lived terrible poor lives
only in the historical complete aberration period of 1960 till 2008 was that lifestyle a net gain due to massive leverage effects of fossil fuels enhancing a craftsmens output
clan based structures are the only thing the anything below aristocracy has to make life worth it

>>51607204
college is a scam, especially today dont even bother better to make a family business and have completely dependable new people available for it

>>51607204
fixed it for ya

>>51606726

When you have 12 kids how can you really be there for them all and give them all the parental attention they need to grow up well adjusted people? Especially if you are working to support them you will have limited time with them and have to try and divy it up between 10+ kids.

4-5 is the optimal amount.

>>51606726
What an amazing woman

>>51606726

At least they aren't half black.

Shame about what those girls will turn into though. How many niggers will they please for the WEF?

>>51606726
My grandparents had 3 kids (were poor until my dad was 10, then became millionaires)
My parents had 3 kids (dad is a surgeon and has made high 6/low 7s for 7 years before I was born)

I don't plan on having a kid until I am at least 30, ideally 35, and don't plan on having 3 unless I am making 500k+ and have a net worth of 7 figures and a big house.
>have high paying job
>have years of good budgeting and a high net worth
>have a wife who can ideally stay and home and raise the kids (at least while they are young)
>have a big enough house to not go insane and live like sardines in a can
>use grandparents for some financial help when possible but expect nothing

>>51607336
>And as a male you can always be divorced and be forced to pay alimony.
Nigga what do you think the divorce rate is for people with 6+ kids? These are traditional people. This is the smallest of their worries.

>hobbies
There are free alternatives to every hobby, they just aren't promoted because nobody is making money.

>>51607204
This anon, I think Its mostly time, attention, and space, not money.

>>51607401
This is a pajeet or south American for sure

>>51607843

>Also god dam she must look like an Arby's sandwich down there.

With that many kids she probably a freak in bed assuming they aren't exhausted at day's end.

Real issue is finding time with that many fucking kids.

>You are officially old for realizing this

>>51606726
7, 5, 12, 11, 6 months

>>51607454
Grandma could stay home and cook/raise them while grandpa worked to support the whole family. Not anymore.

>>51610085
Then you never will. This is like boomers with 8 mill in their 401k afraid to retire at 68.

Young Mormon couples are having kids at age 22 in their bachelor's degree and it works out fine.

>>51610152
Why would I never have kids? I never understand the rationale of people who want me to pop out kids in my early 20s and kneecap my life trajectory. I'm not a woman

>>51607198
Lol why?

>>51610169

>I never understand the rationale of people who want me to pop out kids in my early 20s and kneecap my life trajectory.

*THIS* Goyim is going places, kids...

I think I could reasonably raise 4 kids with just me and my partner, anything more than that would require a live-in nanny or willing grandparent. Money wouldn't be as much of an issue, although I think there are diminishing returns at some point. The 7th kid isn't going to give you any new experiences that the previous 6 couldn't.

I’m never having kids

>>51610182
insightful post. go back
>>>/pol/

>>51610085
Literally idiocracy in play mike judge is a prophet KEK

>>51606726
This is disgustingly white supremacist

>>51609088
except that it does you retard

>>51606726
Theoretically speaking, what’s the limit? 25 kids?

>>51610380
Spoken like a true shitskin

>>51610447
There are historical cases of dudes with 100+ kids, but those men had multiple wives/concubines so at any given time they had a few in the oven (vs only one at a time with one woman).

>>51607336
>have to provide them a place to sleep and live
yes.
>food meds and school cost
Unless they have a severe medical condition they don't need fucking meds for most problems, they need a good diet and an active lifestyle. If you or your wife make enough to float it, the other can always homeschool them, or you and likeminded parents can spring for a combined homeschooling tutor to do the hard part of teaching a larger group of kids, outside of the (((public school shystem)))
>muh AlLoWaNcE
If they want goybucks for toys and snacks beyond what I can/will provide them, they can do chores and yardwork for the money. They'll learn work ethic, and hopefully learn how to work smart before they're old enough for real work.
>they could become a slob who never works
If they're raised right that shouldn't be a problem. Looking at my own upbringing, I've been working since I was 14, but my little brother has been a NEET his whole life, even when my parents had a financial emergency and they lost the house, they didn't make him work to help out. The difference? He was spoiled and got away with everything, whereas I wasn't and I had to work if I wanted more than a 2 dollar "allowance" for doing all of my weeks chores (and I didn't get paid if I offloaded any of them to my brother)
>worst case, divorce and alimony
If you make less than your wife it's your wife that can be forced to pay alimony in leafistan, and even child support if a judge gives the man the kids (rare, but it can happen and our courts are slowly getting better about applying family courts more fairly.)

>>51610544
Yeah, I was thinking how many a woman could have, maybe it’s possible to start at 15 and have one every year until 40, so that’s how I arrived at 25.

>>51607454
my silent and boomer grandparents made enough to raise 5 kids, own a home, own an RV, own a boat, own 2 fully working cars, and still have money to spare off of one parents working class income. My grandmothers didn't have to work so they had the free time to stay around the house and actually raise the kids as well as engage in homemaking pursuits like feeding the kids, making clothing for them, yardwork and gardening to supplement buying food, etc.

I'd need a 3 middle class income houshold to make the same ends meet in Canada today, and we're getting closer and closer to home gardens being banned because "ThE GoVeRnMeNt CaNt InSpEcT EvErY GuArDeN fOr SaFeTy." My municipality already banned food guardens in peoples front lawns because "BuT ThE PeStS!" while ignoring the shitskins who just leave garbage wherever the fuck they want.

>>51606836
If they are brought up right they’ll give chad grandsons

>>51607198
I think the same for Mexicans and Blacks
Fuckers are hella racists

>>51606780
Cunt I just spat XD

>>51609122
nigger

>>51606726
>All daughters
How many do you think will get blacked?

>>51608302
>Implying

Actual Americans like picrel. BBC spammers aren't Americans, end of. They're usually jews, chinamen, or picrel.

>>51608959
Uruguay is almost all criollo, right? That means they're White.

>>51606726
10 and 12 for me

for some reason 11 looks like a 16

>>51607198
Das rite.

>>51609122
Gay ass meme you fucking nigger

>>51610866
*Actual Americans like OP's post.

>>51607198
Lol that ashkenazi schizo gene in action

>>51606726
Wypipo be genociding and enslaving us. We wuz kangz n shiet befo whitey came and stole our kangnezz from us.
Dose blue eyed devils are oppressing us n shiet.

>>51610085
>waiting until 35
Enjoy your retards

>>51610169
Fucking retard. The amount of genetic defects that you will pass on doubles from 20 to 40. The older a father is the more likely his kids will have schizophrenia or autism.

>>51609088
didn't even mention iphones, did caveman have central heating? plumbing? medicine? eating nutritious meat 3 times a day? not just chewing the little muscle off a stray rat? access to thousands of years of knowledge at an instant? if they didn't then yes I am wealthier than a caveman, I am wealthier than a king a 100 years ago because no king on the planet could ever even dream of affording a little metal box that stories millions of books in it

>>51611386
The effect is negligible. The real concern is the age of the mother

>>51606737
I've been building my GF into a based trad wife and we are at the final phase.
She just said "i think we should start baby making next year"
This is it frens. I'm gonna be a dad and I'm gonna have so many white kids that are successful and tradpilled.

>>51606726
kids cost next to nothing to raise on a day to day basis. the only big and necessary expenses you have are medical expenses. if you happen to have a waifu who is down to give birth naturally at home and cook for the family you can do it on a shoestring. plan on having excess funds of just around $100 to $200 per month per child after they arrive plus a little cushion in the bank for emergencies

>>51607198
they look scandinavian, retard

>>51607336
take your meds, urbanite sex offender

>>51611349

This makes me want kids even more. I've been having weird fantasies about like a clan of 20 kids with some Eastern European woman but holy shit if it makes niggers and their cucked faggots in DOJ seethe?!

>>51610866
The guys saying americans post that shit and mutts law are part of the demoralization team/strategy, pay them no heed

>>51606737
This + having a big family makes evolutionary sense and you will never be happy until you have one

>>51611769
Clint Eastwood is an interesting case. He has at least eight kids with six different women

Uhg.. more white people to this world.
Yikeeees.
I can't even...

I'm torn on breeding. On one hand, I feel obligated inasmuch as I'm a human being. So I should have a kid, right? As animals meant to reproduce or whatever. But on the other hand, we're rational animals, which is something no other species can be considered. I often wonder if it's actually right to have a kid in a world like this. How much of it is a sense of obligation to please my mother who wants grandkids? How much of it is out of fear that no one will be around to take care of me when I'm older? How can I have a kid in good conscience when this world is such a blatant consoomer shithole?

>>51606726
>Other than having a big salary, what do you need for raising many kids?

You don't need this. Your kids aren't going to starve if you don't make enough money. Look at all the poor immigrants who have huge families rural religious minorities. They're able to have large families without big salaries just fine.

Also, economic research has shown that socioeconomic status is genetically heritable and largely unaffected by number of siblings, meaning that it doesn't matter much whether you have 2 kids or 5 kids, the wealth of your children as adults will be about the same either way because you'll still be passing on the same genes for intelligence and productivity either way.
proof :
http://faculty.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gclark/ClarkGlasgow2021.pdf
>This means there are some predictions that we can test with the lineage data
>shocks that increase family sizes should under most assumptions, reduce child outcomes since there will be fewer resources per child.
>family size and birth order, elements that would significantly affect the family environment for children, have modest effects on adult outcomes
>For occupational status, for example, the elasticities range from -0.03 to -0.09, implying that a 10% increase in family size reduces occupational status by 0.3%-0.9%.
>To illustrate how modest are the size effects in Table 12 consider figure 12, which shows relative adult occupational status as a function of completed family size for average families, and for the families of the rich. For families in the lineages of average or poor social status expanding family size from 1 to 12 reduced the adult occupational status of children by 7%. For rich families the estimated effect was greater, an 18% reduction. But in both cases the overwhelmingly strong predictor of social outcomes was the social status of the father, not the numbers of children in the family.

tl;dr your children will be as rich as adults whether they have one sibling or 6 or 10

>>51606726
>Is it better to move to a welfare oriented country or to a low tax high income country?
Or is staying near the grandparents the best financial strategy?

Obviously it will be far better to stay near your parents. Your parents will usually be able to help look after their grandchildren much more than moving to a different country.

Just marry a young girl who wants a big family, even better if she comes from a big family, and get started!

It's best to start young . The most you can marriage with a girl in her late 20s is probably 3 .

hkpp0pl5
Mormons are a unique edge case; their societal structure is that of mutual extortion; they're very insular and nepotistic and when you're born into it the cost to escape can be crippling. They have strong adherance to traditional family values so usually the woman is a fulltime housekeeper so they have kids young however the downside is lower income (if woman doesn't work) and limited mobility due to nepotism fatigue. It might be worth it to some but the structure of their society can be stifling to those who have real talent and higher earning potential (wasted time and opportunity doing useless things like attending temple and killing 2-3 years of your youth going to a 3rd world shithole spreading the word of Space Jesus) however the ability to find a good spouse might offset that. It is a crapshoot but as someone with a wife who earns more than me, I wouldn't take the LDS gamble and am currently starting my family in my late 20s.

p0v0+LRX
This- wife and I moved across our state and would gladly do it again. Economic factors change on a local/regional basis and it is important to be willing/able to move if the neighborhood starts to take-on a certain scent. A lot of people cripple themselves by being unwilling to move. Having grandparents around for childrearing is nice but not worth subjecting yourself to squalor.

>>51606726
There is just something incredibly eerie about this picture.

>>51611918
shut up shitskin. go fling more poo into ur drinking water and cheapshot more defenseless poeple from behind. theres a reason white areas are so expensive its because you niggers are not htere

>>51612227
>I often wonder if it's actually right to have a kid in a world like this.
>How can I have a kid in good conscience when this world is such a blatant consoomer shithole?
the thing is, if YOU, a rational and forward-looking individual do not have children, then OTHER dumb, terrible parents will have them either way.
so we enter into a sick and twisted game theory event in which the people who need to be breeding and making the next generation of (intelligent) humans are now forced between choosing money and family
do not think making a quarter million instead of making a family by 30 will make you happy while retarded goy-slaves pop out welfare-children
the f(x) of society will reach its limit with or without your offspring
the question is do you want the next generation to be retarded and raised by gibs or intelligent and raised by good, honest anons like yourself?
>Have a fucking kid and make him based.

>>51612325
It’s too late though too many nigger cattle

>Twins are mixed
Yeah she fucked Tyrone on that year.

>>51612337
so then rope, you pathetic defeatist

>>51612405
Not gonna rope I’m just saying we’re at the point of no return kek boy

>>51607198
cool post rabbi

Some fancy study done by experts now says it costs 300k to raise 1 kid from birth till college age.. Which considering how high things have gotten I can believe it. Why in hell would you want to have kids in today's world anyhow? Parents teaching them from the womb "its ok to be a girl if your a boy" "It's perfectly fine to tolerate it people" Jesus christ.. You know back when I was growing up (80's kid) such talk would get your ass beat. The only thing you really had to watch out for was AIDS.

>>51612965
>trannies exist so I don't want children
Your scope of focus seems a little narrow.

>>51612292
From the twisted mind of Jordan Peele...

>>51606726

imagine her pussy looking like that gagantua black hole in interstellar

>>51611853
Based and Clintpilled

>>51610447
The most children born to a single woman is often claimed to be 69, to a Valentina Vassilyev who lived in mid 1700s Russia. She is claimed to have had a bunch of twins, triplets, and quadruplets. Though it should be noted that record keeping was not the best in that time & location. There have been a number of better documented cases where a single woman has 30+ children, usually again having multiple sets of twins & triplets.

>>51610169
>>my life trajectory

Do elaborate. What kind of world-changing amazingness are you destined for?

>>51614283
Pussy =/= The fulfillment you get from a family with a loving and nurturing woman.

Kek, coomer deteched.

>>51606726
Residing in a non-metropolitan area for lower housing and other costs of living can't hurt. Trade off is fewer employment options as you get further out in the sticks, which may or may not mesh with the parents' skillset. If you're an engine mechanic or something else general/basic the locals always need, all's good. If you're something specialized like a speech therapist, you're going to need to be near a dense population center to be viable. Commuting long distances daily is a drag. Or maybe you can parlay your super-specialized talents into a remote work consultancy.

>>51610623
Real wages have been stagnant since the 70s, so I'm a little skeptical about the 'my parents / grandparents pulled it off just fine' angle.

>>51606726
>>51606780
Kek, rolling...

its not possible to have a child 6 months old and to be 20 weeks pregnant

>>51606726
Cute family. Staying near grandparents is very helpful as that is (in most cases) a reliable babysitter and a wealth of knowledge for your variety of new parent questions.

...rolling

>>51611446
>The effect is negligible


https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/link-parental-age-autism-explained/
>men in their 30s are 1.6 times as likely to have a child with autism as men under 30; men in their 40s have a sixfold increase.

Your kids will be even more retarded

>>51615125
Autism is hereditary. Men with autism are likely to mate later due to their delayed social development.

>>51608135
That's a dragon.

>>51615110
Grandparents need purpose and a place to pass off their culture. Youre just helping the jew globalists turn us all into dumbass goy spawn if youre not making an effort to connect them to their life before they came into being.

>>51612965
Anon, 300k was like a decade ago.

>>51606726
those 2 10yos are gonna be the biggest bros, surrounded by sisters. i wish i had a brother growing up.

>>51606780
i hat eu

>>51606726
Rolling for 5

>>51614346
Dio's mio... El denirocano...

>>51606791
>You get the fetus, congrats!
Rare ME embassy posting

>>51612272
>hkpp0pl5
>p0v0+LRX

>>51607198
okay reddit