/biz/ - Business & Finance

proof

>>5151293
its in the pudding

>>5151273
it's getting ready for the pump.

just bouth 1

>>5151320
nice just bought 100k

Correct me if I'm wrong.. isn't Bitcoin cash soon to be released on coinbase on January 1st? Wouldn't the volume be increase with a pump?

Nice got on early for a China pump.

Next coin on Coinbase

Screencap this

>>5151635
most people are expecting a dump but i wouldnt be so sure of it dumping.

i'll laugh so hard when lightning network is done and shitcoins like BTC and Litecoin lose all purpose for their existence and plummet down to zero

>>5151681
Me either, specially the floor it's hit. I'm kinda shocked not many people are talking about this, specially the amount of normies that bought coinbase recently. Pump shows likely,but you never know in this market.

>>5151635
Thank you. I've been asking this everywhere and nobody has given me a straight answer.

My guess is probably yes. The likelyhood that all BCH holders will drop their bags then and there are minuscule in comparison to all of the people who will most likely just continue to hold their BCH.

I personally don't like Roger Ver, and I believe he's making Bitcoin Cash look very bad with his angry immature outbursts, but BCH tech is light years ahead of BTC, and that's causing a serious dilemma for those who want to use BTC for it's intended purpose (fast, inexpensive, P2P cash system).

Either BTC implements an update to meet consumer demand or it will fail. Alts like LTC and BCH and XMR will take over. BTC will lose value.

TL;DR, I'd buy some BCH bags on a low before January 1st. Hold and set a stop loss for the 1st just in case I'm wrong about the majority dropping their bags. That's what I'm going to do.

I think it will moon by a good amount. Possibly 4x. Good luck.

>>5151802
No problem, it's definitely been quiet going to coinbase, coinbase kicked their own ass back on August 1st no doubt on that email they sent out.

I also see it at least reaching 5k if the pump happens. Those that been around since the hard fork seen what this coin can pump to BTCvalue.

People that want to dumpbags may regret imo

>>5151959

The only people I'm concerned about dropping their BCH bags are the ones who were early adopters of crypto. I'm talking the big guys, the whales who are sitting somewhere at at least one million USD or more, or those who when they receive their BCH/are able to withdraw from Coinbase will become millionaires.

If there's a lot of bagholders sitting in the six to seven figures range, I'm afraid they will drop enmasse then and there. But if there's enough friction there, meaning enough people looking to hold that outnumber the whales, at the very least, we will see slow growth. I think it will either a.) moon hard, given the sudden influx of money, the tech being better than BTC, less centralization than core, etc etc.

B.) whales in the six to seven figure range will cash out whilst at the same time the late adopters will outnumber the whales yet keep their bags due to confidence in BCH as a competitor to BTC, thus, we'll see growth in the price of BCH but not a hard moon.

Or worst case scenario,

C.) The number of whales and average bagholders looking to drop their bags absolutely decimates the price and value of the currency. The price of BCH goes down in a rapid decline. But I still don't see how this would be a long term thing either because like I said, fundamentally, BCH tech > BTC tech all the way around. There's no way of arguing against it.


I could be wrong, I'm not a pro or an economist but these are some of the thoughts I've had considering this.

Once again, good luck anon. Hope it works out for you and you make some $$$.

>>5151273
>20 minutes
>0/10 confirmations
I thought this was satoshi's vision

>>5151802
Lol? You mean the single time he was angry enough to tell someone actively agitating him to go and fuck themselves? And then brought the face of their business into it because they're a passive aggressive pussy who needs to be put into their place rather than being allowed to say whatever they'd like without consequence in fields that warrant them 0 credibility? Roger raped that faggot and eloquently represents himself and Bitcoin Cash. Maybe instead of watching a single interview you could research on your own, brainlet? Also, the only reason Bitcoin Cash exists is because he facilitated its existence through something called money, which I'm certain you have none of based on your lack of logical foundation. If you want to dislike someone, make sure it's at least warranted, or go back to normiebook where your name and face somehow put other normies under the impression that your opinion matters.

>>5151802
this.

>>5152394
fuq you talking about?
i just send from my ledger to binance for 0.01 cent fee and it showed up 15mins later

>>5152413
Awwww you gonna cry anon?

>>5152466

>>5152538
>ok shareblue team, we got anally raped on the battlefield today, seems like people realized BCH is better than our diahrreacoin, but thats OK! we just have to separate the creator of Bitcoin Cash from Bitcoin Cash in order to keep using our archaic subversion tactics! they'll totally work this time!

>>5152413

Roger isn't a developer, he got lucky and got rich off of it dude. Every time somebody tries to confront him about the tech and he can't give real answer he tries to deflect and change the subject. The guy is a fucking total moron.

> "Also, the only reason Bitcoin Cash exists is because he facilitated its existence through something called money, which I'm certain you have none of based on your lack of logical foundation. If you want to dislike someone, make sure it's at least warranted, or go back to normiebook where your name and face somehow put other normies under the impression that your opinion matters"

I'm not even shitting on BCH. It's a good alternative and serious contender in my eyes for BTC. However, I find this part of your post ironic, because this is literally the same type of behavior Rodger pulls every time someone tries to confront him on the tech.

> Hurrdurrr I'm a millionaire hurrrr I got monies stay poor fgtdhevekc

Never change Rog.

>>5152632
The devs of Cash are 10 times smarter than the devs of Core. Have you actually listened to any of them?

>>5151689
18 months!
18 months!
18 months!

>>5152539
>34 minutes for 1 confirmation
>this is what bch shills have been shilling

>>5152413
I hated Roger before it was cool. When he was shilling bitcoin he went around just blatantly lying to the media to cast bitcoin in as a positive light as possible. Same thing he does with bcash.

>>5152632
Except that wasn't his point. His point was that he can successfully run a business that can gross over $1MM with ease, while bitch-boy clogged-nose faggot can't gross $1MM while being in the back pocket of blockstream and core lmfao. His point made absolutely perfect sense and in fact was the perfect way to rub it in the face of some low-life piece of shit with an attitude who wants to condescendingly harrass him. 4 years ago Roger Ver openly stated that he did not support the roadmap for BTC and that if Core devs would not come to an agreement that was beneficial for the network that he would actively pursue hard-fork options. That was 4 years ago. The guy has done everything right, yet I hear these constant and often baseless negative opinions. At least go back to the mtgox excuse instead of the opinions without foundation lmao.

>>5152784


>0.02 Rupees added to your account

>>5151273
If this is the last change, does that mean you'll leave us alone after it also doesn't flip this time?

>>5153544
You wish

>>5151635
500,000 BCH will be released to the people who held BTC when it forked.
Of course the price will dump

>>5152295
Whales with vast amounts of BTC don't hold them on coinbase.

Already bought... great buy in price

>>5151802
>better tech
Those bags must weight tons to amount such delusion.

>>5153598
you think massive whales that live on private island give a shit about their bch? they don't even want to bother to move these coins from their private key. What about satoshi dude has over a million bitcoins, he alone could end bcash

>>5153621
according to andreas its all about utility. with btc core dropping vendors and bch adding vendors well, you see where this is going
>muh LN
yea ok

>>5153661
The fundamentals about Bitcoin Cash are changing rapidly.

>>5153661
lol, Satoshi is literally bankrolling BCH

>>5153684
>yea ok
So we agree that Bcash is trash and will never scale to fill its mission statement even close. Good.

>>5153692
yeah great fundamentals like emergency difficulty adjustments. Any time the miners want to mine cheaper coins they just wait for 6 blocks not to mined in 12 hours and then like magic POOF! the difficulty automatically gets dropped by 20%. when this happens blocks are mined at much faster rate. Enjoy your inflation with your shitcoin 2 halving in literally the next 2 years. Enjoy your shitcoin

>>5153778
see>>5151320

>>5153778
passive aggressive nerd language as per usual lmao.

nice try

>>5153797
Bitcoin does fine with inflation. What’s the problem.

>>5153797
its 144 blocks retard, study what you plan to FUD. But let me guess, you're a newcoiner, all in on LINK and think that it's perfectly okay for an ecosystem to be permanently crippled at the drop of a pin. LMFAO

>>5153565

Coinbase will add BCH to their exchange, the price will shoot upward friend.

>>5153812
It's a mathematical fact. Continue to live in your delusion. It's you who's going to lose it all, not me.

>>5153863
If it dips on Jan 1st I’m buying that dip.

>>5153879
thats why i have 4 spare btc hehe

>>5153870
>nucoiners never heard of Moore’s Law

saged Pnd

>>5153847
lol I sold 20 bch cash at .2. Thanks for the free 80k from cucks like you. Operation dragonslayer btw. I cant wait for this shit coin to crash so fucking hard on the first. Know what everyone is going to do as soon as the get their bcash? Oh look free money!! Sell that shit

>>5153661
Kek, Satoshi alone could end core

>>5153899
ayy lmao

>>5153902
The increase in both storage space and internet bandwidth has been radically decelerating in growth in the past decade. Assuming exponential growth on exponential growth that would be required for one gigabyte blocks is sheer lunacy. Enjoy your centralized China-coin.

>>5153976
>operation drsgonslayer

Cool story bro.

>>5154028
Both coins are controlled by China you retard. And the Chinese might be more rational than the blockchain idiots and their Segwit coin.

Miners control Bitcoin.

>>5153797
What?

I'm talking about THIS kind of fundamentals:

>>5100627

>>5152725
What devs? They forked bitcoin and changed like 4 lines of code.

>>5154069
You seem very eager for Bitmain to fuck you in the ass. I'm not. Bitcoin is not. Competition is already here and Segwit removed the unfair advantage of ASICboost.

What, no buy wall screenshot?

>>5154133
https://youtu.be/SyF_3SZKhY8

I could pull a random person off the street and teach them more about Bitcoin in an hour than this Core “Dev” knows.

>>5151689
The only people who spout on about how LN will fix btc don't actually know what LN does. Kinda like the people who said segwit would fix btc.

>>5151273
Trusting a coin that fucked up this badly from the very start. "
The original Bitcoin Cash “EDA” allowed Bitcoin Cash to survive as a minority chain but produces wild fluctuations of hashrate. This is problematic because it prevents consistently fast confirmations for users, and radically shifts the coin issuance schedule." But don't worry! everything is great now and this coin is the real bitcoin btw

>>5154160
You’re delusional if you don’t understand that hash power is king.

>>5151273

>>5154243
Without ASICboost and production bottleneck for mining hardware, Bitmain will not be the major player it currently is.

>>5153899

What's the point in waiting? The price is going to continue appreciating, especially when normies notice Bitcoin Cash is listed in Bitpay.

Also you may not have realised but the main crypto news sites have failed to create articles about Bitpay adding Bitcoin Cash - they didn't because they're owned by Blockstream, so the retarded masses are still mostly unaware of Bitpay's decision to add Bitcoin Cash AND to list it as the default payment method.

>>5153976
you're literally a larping 55 year old foreigner lmao but thats ok. Keep stacking that BTC! Maybe you should use your house as colateral for the largest loan possible as well!

bcrap will always be a counterfeit, a phoney creation.

>>5154300
my nigga i know bch will win but I keep btc as my insurance just in case. i got 50 bch 4 btc

>>5154359


How is bcash gonna win over LN is beyond my comprehension.

>>5153797
BCH difficulty calculates every block based on how long the previous 144 blocks took. This makes the wild swings in block times due to varying hashrate muchless prominent. If all the hashrate were to switch to bch at once, difficulty would rapidly increase.

>>5154419

>>5153826
that's a bear flag, right?

>>5154028
>8mb blocks would cut through the btc mempool like butter and wouldn't require another block size increase for a long time.
>nope, too big. Keep it at 2009 1mb levels pls.

>>5154419
With 1 gigabyte blocks every 10 minutes.

>>5154498
For maybe a month or so. What then? 16 MB blocks. Eventually you get to really big numbers that will completely crash the entire chain.

Let us clarify some things.

Cash is Bitcoin.
Core is Segwit coin.

>>5154511
With lower fees all around.

>>5154335
Not a stupid nigger like you who needs to LARP

>>5154550
Segwit = Superior tech
Bcash = Trash

>>5154566
and 3 nodes in China

>>5154578
>being this delusional

Segwit was created by Banks to control your Bitcoins.

>>5154619
That's just a lie. I'm not going to bother.

>>5154511
>>5154540
If 1gb block limit happened tomorrow, none of the blocks would actually hit 1gb for a very long time.

I don't understand the disconnect core fans have behind "every poor person should be able to run a non mining full node"(which does nothing, btw), and "poor people literally can't afford to actually use btc"

>>5154419

Because the LN is vaporware and is mathematically impossible to actually implement. Even if a bunch of retards and a nigger some how figure out some sloppy way of implementing it, it will be entirely centralized around a few nodes (aka cryptobanks)

Kill yourself shill

>>5154648
>30$ to buy a Coffee
>muh poor people
>muh decentralization

>muh lightning network
You mean your off chain Banking controlled network?

>>5154550

Hmmm, What do we have here

Scalability. Capable of millions to billions of transactions per second across the network. Capacity blows away legacy payment rails by many orders of magnitude

Price. All time high, meanwhile bcash stagnates

Hashpower. 13 exahash, enough said

>>5154698
Did you even read what I wrote

>>5154578
Bcash has VISA
Core has 30 min process time plus fees up the ads. Truly satoshis vision.
Have you read satoshi' s original papers ?? He said BTC would have major scalability than whatever visa was using to process transactions world wide. Not happening. The closest we can get is a coin that has the same speed and fees as a visa card that's why Bcash is superior for now. There still needs to be a true decentralized succesor

>>5154648
>which does nothing
Another lie. Node validates the transactions which means you can have 100% certainty that your money and trade is safe.

>>5154724
>billions of transactions a second

So 30 billion in transaction fee’s per second?

kek bitcoin cash threads are always the busiest

>>5154728
I was just clarifying more.

>>5154759
>Validates
>non mining node

Sorry friend, miners validate. And if the miners change their consensus rules, your meme node has zero say in it

>>5154609
1200 ABC nodes, 280 BU nodes, etc. It's only expanding, retard. Sorry your raspberry pi cant confirm transactions with 0 incentive anymore lmao

>>5154810
At least you could do your research first before you start shilling.

>>5154810

my meme node tells me the rules are violated and I go there to raid your silly government cucks mining farms to change to the original Nakamoto Rules as defined by Bitcoin core

Fuck off!!!

>>5154844
I was talking about the inevitable centralizatoin and data centers, not the Amazon web services instances bought by Bitmain.

>>5154877
The US Government doesn’t have jurisdiction in a China.

>>5154853
It would cause a chain split, guess who would mine on your chain lmao. Do you think the miners who are theoretically fucking you over will? LMFAO. Good luck beating out thousands of miners with 150MM USD in network difficulty for 2016 blocks straight i guess rofl.

>>5154300
I love how hairy her arms are,she must have glorious pubes

>>5154926
The reality is that Bitcoin doesn't need Bitmain. It's Bitmain who very desperately needs the economy.

The funny thing about cashies is that they can spam biz all day but it won't prevent Lightning Network from not happening. It doesn't even cause a pump of bcash. All that shilling in vain. LOL

>>5154799
buy signal. also checked

>>5151689
>LN
>peer to peer electronic cash system

Pick one, also it's never coming out.

>>5154989
>not
*

>>5154970
You ignored what I said completely lmfao. Your node does nothing but confirm. After the chain splits your chain will die because your node is not also mining based on your nodes' "legitimate chain". Once Bitmain releases the patents on ASICs Satoshi will dump his 1,000,000 BTC. Screencap this.

>>5154853
>>5154877
If miners change consensus, your node gets left behind. No hashrate? Your old chain dies.

>>5155026
Corecucks don’t understand anything about mining.

>>5155026
For miners to stay afloat, they actually need someone to buy their shitcoin. You can't mine if you can't afford the hardware, electricity and everything else that goes with it.

>THIS TIME
>IT'S DIFFERENT

>>5155054
And where do Devs fit into that equation?

People will choose which protocol they prefer, not devs.

>>5154300
Those are some disgusting arms

>>5152394
Post address and transaction ID or kys.

Non mining full nodes are only expensive relay stations. Electricity and data, those are your costs. You get nothing in return except maybe you make more connections in the network. But still, most miners are directly connected to eachother to reduce latency.

>>5155096
Yes, and nobody wants to use a centralized shitcoin.

BCH is waiting for BTC to crash. There can be only one king.

>>5155026
>If miners change consensus

this is what you cashies are doing on a weekly basis on your chain, meanwhile core chain is the original chain as started by Nakamoto.

you can check this theory easily, just run some old version of Bitcoin an you will see that it synces successfully to the Bitcoin chain and not to the bcash chain

bcash is the hard fork that arbitrarily changed the difficulty rule.

>>5155123
Full security and control over my money is not nothing.

>>5155136
>cost miner 30% to transfer segwit coins to exchange
>makes 100$ a day mining

So 30% of his profits go to fees.

High fee’s innately cause mining centralization. The thing you fear the most.

>>5154687
This.

>>5155206
If miners stop mining, the difficulty will go down, which will cause mining to be more profitable and more miners will start mining. It's not fucking rocket science.

Plus you are arguing against yourself as a payment channel like LN would cut those fees 1000x.

>>5155250
That's fake from r/bitcoin, jew.

>>5155282
>miners will support a network that tries to eliminate them

Are corecucks really that stupid?

>>5155136
LN will create centralized hubs. Heavily connected, large liquidity hubs. The more connections you have, the more money you need locked up to keep them open. This prices out small hubs as everyone will gravitate towards the hubs that grant better services. Literally turning bitcoin into a banking system.

I don't understand the hate towards miners. Core people want to replace a perceived centralized system with an actual centralized system controlled by special interests. Blockstream has a very real financial incentive to stifle bitcoin growth to create an artificial problem so that they can market their own solution for it.

>>5155190
That's not what it is, though. Surely you understand that if the entire network didn't agree with the rules your node was working with, that the coins on that chain would be worthless. Please tell me that makes sense to you

>>5155330
i was thinking this in my head but cant put it into words like you
>pic related
its me

>>5154300
i want to lick her arms

>>5151273
No thanks. Ethereum is the future.

>>5155330
Yes, that's a good argument. Bitcoin has problems and scaling is hard. Bitcoin Cash is just technically braindead solution to a very difficult problem.

Personally. I think Schnorr signatures and LN can achieve scaling while keeping money secure and censorship resistant.

If you want to push your pet conspiracy theory I'm not going to stop you. I just think that the probability of that being true is vanishingly low.

>>5155098
yea seriously wtf is going on with her arms?

>>5155416
>>5154956
>>5155098

Now I want to play with her light blonde hairy arms too damnit

>>5155443
kek
IOTA will destroy BTC with its unlimited scaling

>>5155479
50/50 of IOTA destroying itself first.

>>5155330
There are dozens of other problems as well with LN. Satoshi found a solution for one of the holy grail problem in CS, and BTC decided to depart it to doing Paypal over Bitcoin.

>>5155443
How is it a conspiracy theory that increasing block size to even 16mb today would fix the problem right now, without any increase in mining centralization, and then blockstream could play science experiment with btc? They are keeping blocks tiny to create pressure to force their solution on everyone. It's not a conspiracy, just take two seconds and think.

>>5155443
Corecucks don’t understand Moore’s Law.

>>5155504
Corecucks actually believe in shitcoins.

Color me surprised.

>>5155374
Yes, if I was the only one with my personal rule set, everybody would ignore me. That's true. The point of running a full node is exactly that, to ignore nodes that break consensus.

>>5155537
My math tells me that 16 MB blocks would increase the blockchain by 840 GB per year. Making it out of reach for most consumer hardware quite rapidly.

>>5155547
t. brainlet

>>5155610
Why are you so scared of Moore’s Law?

>>5155641
I think Moorse law stopped applying already.

>>5155479
>Unlimited scaling
>Can't reuse addresses
>Unproven tech

Yeah that should work

>>5155561
Which mining nodes do already. They aren't going to mine new consensus rules unless all the other miners do too. Your node only sits back and watches.

>bch being technically braindead solution
Almost the entire history of bitcoin, blocks were not full. Now they are, and instead of increasing size to keep them not full, we're supposed to let the network clog and work on a far off solution that risks the very fundamentals of what gives bitcoin value? Take 2 seconds and look up harddrive space and bandwidth today compared to 2010, and tell me with a straight face that increasing block size will increase centralization. I can buy a 50 dollar harddrive today that can hold 10 btc blockchains.

>>5155663
really only for processors based on silicone tech. Graphene is going to keep moore going strong in the next few years.... but this isn't /g/

>>5155641
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey

Median consumer level free harddrive space is 250 GB.

It's been close to that for almost a decade.

>>5155610
If blocks were actually full, which they wouldn't be. Please understand that a block size limit doesn't mean every block is that size.

>>5155685
This.

>>5155663
>being this retarded

>>5155711
What are SSD’s?

Do you have any other genius insight?

>>5155663
The sheer fucking state of people.

>>5155719
Yes, we will never know without trying, but the problem is that once done, we can't go back. I think it's very plausible that 16 MB would be rapidly filled with the boom happening lately.

>>5155711
Your own link proves you wrong anyway.

>>5155757
>>5155794
Please go and be a brainlet somewhere else. You are embarrassing yourself.

I think the "problem" is bandwidth and not data storage. I don't think Moore's law applies to that.

>>5155845
>http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey

Can you read?

>>5155789
There's always a boom when btc breaks new ground, and it always dies down, and levels at the rising average. Scaling to that rising average is what matters. Except that rising average is going to stop since people are no longer accepting btc, and ever more people are accepting bch. I know your mind is made up, but check out r/btc sometime. Check out the progress its making and the exciting times ahead. Then look at r/bitcoin and it's all moon boys and people who don't actually know what LN does except that it's supposed to "make tx fees go down".

Creating an artificial bottle neck to push a solution is no way to scale bitcoin.

>>5151802
There's no tech, all they did was hike block size, and it's not a long term solution. Everything else, all the whining about segwit, meaningless. No block size could handle Visa-level transactions.
Bitcoin is either going to start using offchain methods like LN, or it will crash and be replaced. The underlying tech common to Bitcoin and all its forks is itself garbage, and Satoshi was either indifferent or far dumber than bcash shills are willing to admit.

>>5155880
Total hard drive space is not the same thing as available hard drive space.

>Chinese exchanges surging
this is your final warning

>>5155941
>available hard drive space has any relation to Moore’s Law

Are you legitimately braindead?

>>5155711
does not matter what the median is. Not everyone needs to run a fucking node it does not add to security. Satoshi has said this.

>>5155610

LOL 0/10 made me reply

A 2TB HD is like $40.

I wonder who could make up such a non-argument and repeat it with a straight face.

>>5151320
Makes sense. Gonna throw in $1M

>>5155994
Either a shill or a dumb person, or a combination of both.

>>5156032
based

>>5156081

27 posts by this ID

You are racking it in today pajeet, you keep this up and one day you'll be able to afford a ticket on a rickety boat in no time.

I've realized why cashies are so desperate. They've got a much larger portion of their funds in BCH than BTC holders do. If BTC fails, the BTC holder still has most of their funds in the BCH chain, while if BCH fails, they have jack shit on the BTC chain.

>>5156175

>>5156175
It’s actually the opposite.

All the recent nucoin normies don’t have any BCH.

>>5156175
Am pretty sure it is the opposite. Most corecucks reportedly sold their BCH. kek

>>5156175

>>5156175
This is the most retarded thing I've read all day jesus christ

https://medium.com/@CobraBitcoin/thoughts-on-bitcoin-as-a-settlement-layer-c40cc1415815
what did cobra mean by this? is it a trap?

Uh oh! We're losing. Better stop replying to the thread so that the fact that we were massively raped by logic doesn't leak to the brainlets!

>>5151273
Last chance to get out of this fucking scam coin created by two scammers lmao

Why are Bitcoin cashiers wrong

what bugs me that they actually believe Bcash chain could somehow, become the actual Bitcoin. How could you not see that once Bitcoin "core" fails for some reason, Bcash is going to fail for the precisely same reason!

IF and only IF Bitcoin core fails due to the 1MB cap of Nakamoto then I'll acknowledge they actually were right.

Could you bcashiers elaborate your theory how it is gonna happen? How core fails due to 1MB cap?

By fail I mean Bitcoin price crashing and ceases to be used at all.

>>5156682
ayyy lmao

>>5156175
>$20 to send $1
>desperate
Try harder.

>>5156767
> 1MB cap of Nakamoto
Stopped reading there. The cap was only a function of the BTC price, nothing more.

>>5155250
Doesn't add up. If you get kicked out of USA no way Japan is going to let you in.

>>5154574
I'll suck your dick every day for a year for 10% of that

>>5156767
But Bitcoin Cash is literally Bitcoin. Its more Bitcoin than the current bitcoin is.

>>5153863
This is the pajeet meme being spread but Coinbase are only adding BCH for withdrawal.

>>5156940
They've been programmed on theymos controlled /r/bitcoin and bitcointalk.com.

Also shills up the ass. I FUCKING HATE JEWS!!!

>>5157254

Yes because Coinbase is immune to market forces, makes perfect sense. They'll totally not go bankrupt for ignoring what their customers and what the market wants. I think that would make them the only top exchange to not list Bitcoin Cash and allows a competitor to muscle in.

It's extremely unlikely that Coinbase won't list Bitcoin Cash.

>>5157507
>thinks the market wants bcash
>below .1 again

>>5152867
>tfw you realize roger ver IS satoshi

>>5156209
I have been on cloud fucking 9 since i realized this. God bless you coinbase devs. I'm so glad I didn't withdraw.

>>5154574
Cool. Make sure that you hedge yourself for the incoming waves of terror, rather than emotionally FUD yourself into bankruptcy. If I lost that amount based off of a small percentage of my capital that could have instead been used to ensure my current net worth sustaining value, I would kill myself. Don't do that to yourself. If you sold, fine, if Jan 1st, brings down the price, fine. Just make sure you hedge correctly so that you can NOT kill yourself regardless of the outcome. Otherwise idk, but just remember Bitcoin is smart money. Dumb people have been wealthy for too long and that's what is changing, the same will be said for BTC vs BCH. If you can hedge yourself correctly, do it, or don't regret it if you lose it all. By the way, it's not hard to input numbers in blockfolio, but regardless I don't actually care about how much money you may or may not have invested, so I'm not asking for more proof, we can play off the assumption that those are your legitimate holdings - fine. Honestly your portfolio is better than any of the other one's I've seen lately, but don't think that it's going to attest to your ability to make a "good" decision. In fact, your portfolio goes against your logic, which really is enigmatic. I'm going to assume you googled the top performing coins and entered them, which is not necessarily a hard thing to do right after Bitcoin sees a 15k bullrun lmao.

>>5156767
>become bitcoin
Brainlet detected. Bitcoin Cash has been Bitcoin since 2009. Let me tell a story:
>Mr Satoshi Nakamoto is a Satoshi. He has two sons.
>Satoshi Cash and Satoshi Segwit
I think I can stop my story right there.

>>5154740
Ecc is it

>>5151273
No, we don't want OP's bags.

>>5155641
Moore's Law is almost over (and it applies to processing power rather than storage anyway). If you actually look at modern laptops and PCs, high-end models come with SSDs rather than HDDs. And new SSDs currently have much lower storage capacities than HDDs and cost more per GB.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/the-end-of-moores-law-why-the-theory-that-computer-processors-will-double-in-power-every-two-years-10394659.html

>>5159647
>>5159830
Thanks for bumping my thread

>>5153696
Satoshi is an AI.

>>5155182
>segwit wasn't a fork that altered protocol
>segwit wasn't a hostile takeover of the network
>segwit doesn't decouple digital signatures from transactions
>segwit can be removed
>segwit doesn't violate game theory in mining

>>5154207
>Roger Ver is a developer of anything ever at all

Moon confirmed. Coinbase API.

>>5154799
You're getting a first hand look at decentralized warfare.

>>5155610
HOW WILL MINERS AND BUSINESS AFFORD ALL OF THESE $100 2TB HARD DRIVES WITH A FREE COPY OF ASSASSINS CREED?!

https://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100167523%204027%20600003269%20600361769%20600457700

>>5155941

>>5156815
Unfortunately Corecucks can only have 1MB cap of Nakamoto. I enjoy a 8MB cap of Nakamoto every morning.

>>5159830
>only SSDs are available on the market

>>5160456
This.

Corecucks BTFO.

In another thread they proclaim Bitcoin could not be a bubble because currencies aren't a bubble but yet completely overlook the compromised ONLY Dev team left proclaiming Bitcoin is no longer a currency. They are fucking beyond retarded.

I warned you corecucks about Bcash. You didn't fucking listen

I can't decide if I want to put my money on this or on ETH

shill me

>>5154799
Ye cos Segwit ain't Bitcoin