/biz/ - Business & Finance

I still believe it was the CIA along with some other fed agency. I have my reasons. One of which
>Satoshi Nakamoto = Central Intelligence
and immediately after being rolled out just COHENCIDENTALLY all darknet drug shops switched to BTC, and somehow magically these people started getting tracked and caught, hmmmm
>inb4 its Dorian Nakamoto
you mean the poorfag that wrote a book because somehow he doesnt have profits from his own creation?

>>51495829
also, heres dorian himself saying its not him
https://www.youtube.com/embed/VGSY3aBZx1s?autoplay=1&FORM=VIRE6&PC=SMSM

>>51495813
It was Adam Back, Nick Szabo and Hal Finney, working with the CIA using the NSA created SHA-256 algo.

>>51495911
Blessed dubs. The most quickest, rational answer Ive ever seen here.

>>51495939
You're welcome.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Finney_(computer_scientist)

>>51495954
what do you think of >>51495911 /OPs theory

>>51495813
CIA obviously

>>51495813
When you hear the name "Satoshi Nakamoto", many think of a Japanese man or male identifying individual. What if I told you think was because of your own bigotry? This man-dominated narrative has be able to thrive due to the unfortunate plague of "crypto bros" in this industry, and the fact that Satoshi herself has remained anonymous since bitcoin's birth. (One can only assume this is for her own safety, as a woman of her intelligence must know about the reality of violence against women in male dominated spaces).

Here are 5 examples that illustrate Satoshi identified as a woman:

Collaboration — in opposition to the male ego and competition. Instead of having one centralized point of transaction, the blockchain is built by multiple points working together in unison to create more security.

Inclusion — The bitcoin project is open source encourages all people to participate in its further innovation. Because it is anonymous by nature, nobody can be excluded from participating due to race, gender, or sexual orientation.

Values-driven — for the first time in history we have the ability to infuse values like generosity, equality and goodness into our currencies.

Community centered — the Blockchain is strengthened by participation from a diverse community, and the value of bitcoin is directly correlated to the diversity of it's participants.

Generosity — Bitcoin has inspired countless people to pay it forward and create good in the world. Millions of people around the world have benefited from the work and inspiration of one brave woman.

These are the values Satoshi instilled into the Blockchain. This was Satoshi's true vision.

>>51496989
Great b8 m8. 4/10 you almost put some effort into it. Now fuck off.

>>51495813
The dom of crypto

>>51495813
DARPA, isnt it obvious ?

>>51495813
A "Satoshi" individual never existed. The real "Satoshi" was multiple people; Bitcoin was created by the NSA and possibly several other agencies. It was not a 1-man project. It was a government project.

NSA paper from 1996: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm

>even talks about the "double spend" problem

Interesting to note is that there's a "Tatsuaki Okamoto" there. Not only does Okamoto sound similar to Nakamoto, but if you rearrange the letters a bit you can get pretty close to Satoshi Nakamoto.

TATSUAKI OKAMOTO
SATO__I _AKAMOTO (discarded: T, U and K)

The extra needed letters are S, H and N.

The NSA created SHA 256, which Bitcoin uses.

S and H can be found in "SHA 256".
Remove S and H from "SHA 256" and left is "A 256".
The 14th letter of the alphabet is N.
A is the 1st letter.
So "A 256" equals "1 256".
1+2+5+6 equals 14.
So, "SHA 256" = SHN <--- the extra needed letters missing in "SATO__I _AKAMOTO".

And no, the glowie Craig Wright isn't Satoshi, because a Satoshi individual never existed, however clearly he was involved in at least some manner. It seems he was later tasked with playing the role of "Satoshi" to keep the "Satoshi the individual" myth alive and to be a controlled opposition of sorts. This explains a lot of things.

>>51495813
A "Satoshi" individual never existed. The real "Satoshi" was multiple people; Bitcoin was created by the NSA and possibly several other agencies. It was not a 1-man project. It was a government project.

NSA paper from 1996: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm

>even talks about the "double spend" problem

Interesting to note is that there's a "Tatsuaki Okamoto" there. Not only does Okamoto sound similar to Nakamoto, but if you rearrange the letters a bit you can get pretty close to Satoshi Nakamoto.

TATSUAKI OKAMOTO
SATO__I _AKAMOTO (discarded: T, U and K)

The extra needed letters are S, H and N.

The NSA created SHA 256, which Bitcoin uses.

S and H can be found in "SHA 256".
Remove S and H from "SHA 256" and left is "A 256".
A is the 1st letter of the alphabet.
So "A 256" equals "1 256".
1+2+5+6 equals 14.
The 14th letter of the alphabet is N.
So "1 256" equals N.
So, "SHA 256" = SHN <--- the extra needed letters missing in "SATO__I _AKAMOTO".

And no, the glowie Craig Wright isn't Satoshi, because a Satoshi individual never existed, however clearly he was involved in at least some manner. It seems he was later tasked with playing the role of "Satoshi" to keep the "Satoshi the individual" myth alive and to be a controlled opposition of sorts. This explains a lot of things.