/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51466102
it was inevitable

everyone knew this since 2021 already tell us something new

>>51466102
I have a spare Hunnid should I add linkies to my portfolio?

>>51466102
>he knows

PRAISE KEK

>>51466161
Become a wholelinker. Its both suicide and make its stack.

>smug repeating inverse head and shoulders pattern
thanks op just bought 100k

>>51466102
Delusional

>>51466102
how did you get the future price chart?

>>51466102
Exactly but the first run was only wave 1.
Wave 3 is the most explosive leg, comprised of its own 5 part wave pattern.
I recall a poster claiming the gains buyers at 6 will receive will surpass the gains from 10 cents to 55 dollars
That's what he meant. Wagmi bros

>>51466660
Nice hopium

Reality has been faced

>>51466595
The oracle obviously...
jeez lol

the writing was literally on the wall of smart money moving into LINK post merge, good on the anons that listened.

>>51466847
Reality got hands on god fr

I only have 2.6K LINK. Will i become rich?

>>51466102
even if it pumps against btc at best it will crab against usd

>>51466102
We ought to short the Great Reset before it's too late lads. Don't let the shills convince you otherwise.

>>51467275
2,600 x 81,000 =

>>51466525
What’s a whole linker? I can’t sell for a loss, not a fag rather watch it go to 0 so the government can’t take it or other parties I’m in debt with. So I only add to portfolio never sell when it’s a useless amount of dollars. Should I still throw the 100 in?

>>51466102
Still going to bleed against the USD as the market goes down the shitter

>>51467132
so man anons that said it
so many paid fudders that refuted it
and so many newfags missing the train once again

sad many such cases, just like eth in last cycle

Reminder this anon predicted all of it.

>>51466102
>Chart is drawing an 'N'
Dare I say, based?

>>51466660
If the first run was wave 1, and wave 3 typically is 161% then we can expect peak of wave 3 to be around $8,800. Ill be honest bros I'd have trouble not selling at that point and buying an island or Slovakia or something.

>>51466102
it needs to breack the resistance and then we can talk

>>51467589
I wonder if he predicted August because that was when the merge was supposed to happen before it was pushed to September

>>51467813
that image is from 2021, correct me if i am wrong but wasnt the merge supposed to be in 2021 at that time
it cant recall exactly anymore, but even start of 2022 the merge was supposed to be in march/april
vitalik really dragged his heels on that one

>>51467906
>vitalik really dragged his heels on that one
I'd drag my heels too on the update that screams "We need the guy I hate in order to function correctly".

>>51467906
You’re right. They delayed a number of times. I forgot how many times vitalik kicked the can down the road

>>51467589
>>51467906
>>51467984
>>51468028
why will it pump?

>anemic pump on abysmal volume against a minor market downtrend
>catalogue flooded with bullish shitposts
kek, very organic guise, much bullish, just bought another 100k
see you back at $5 in 2 weeks

>>51468336
why not $0?

>>51468354
perpetual bleeding, endless unfulfilled promises, constant carrot dangling to ensure no one ever sells
it's a marathon anon, not a sprint

>>51466161
LINK is a sweet risk to take but whaever you are adding make sure you consider some based DAO token like RAIL. You gotta start making decisions on your assets.

>>51468376
I thought nobody cared about fundamentals?

>>51468446
you people do and that's all that matters baby!

>>51466102
Crosschain Interoperability will always scale just like transaction privacy regardless of the sentiments of the feds.

>>51468482
>gibberish technobubble
bot

>>51468203
Token will be needed

>>51468495
>I don't understand these words so they don't mean anything

>>51468599
checked
it has been needed since day 1 anon
to dump on you

>>51467589
what's the new ATH?

>>51466102
>Shows chart with the mother of all bear flags.
>Thinks it’ll go up

The cope is real

>>51468609
>Crosschain Interoperability will always scale just like transaction privacy regardless of the sentiments of the feds.
ANALise it for me please
>Crosschain Interoperability will always scale
what the fuck does that mean? "always"?? "scale"??
>just like transaction privacy
literally what????
>regardless of the sentiments of the feds
what?????
none of these sequences of words put together make any sense whatsoever

>>51468643

>>51466102
mfw it was all true. all of it

>doesn't realise Link has deep-state approval
>tries to fud Link with SEC
Oh dear, boys.... please try a little harder, just for me?

>>51468643
How's the weather up there in the middle of the bell curve

>>51468682
>>51468721
just admit you fucked up for once, there's no shame on that

>>51468643
Not gonna spoodfeed you
Stay poor
NGMI
!

>>51468737
there's nothing to spoonfeed me on, it's literally a word salad kek

>>51466102
I continue to hold LINK, but I also prefer to diversify, therefore I have had the opportunity to hold other reliable alts like Coti, CryptoXpress, Iris, and Glmr OP.

>>51467132
>wall of smart money moving into LINK post merge
Why is this though?

>>51469401
CCIP, staking, FSS, DECO, enterprise abstraction layer, and literal Illuminati leadership on a stage telling you to buy Chainlink (ticker: $LINK)

>>51469481
I am familiar with all of that; however, why specifically post merge? Was Chainlink dependent on Ethereum switching over to a proof of stake mechanism? I am not familiar with the technicalities of Chainlink, only the general vision.

>>51468495
if you did not understand this, then you're a fucking moron

>>51466102
I can't believe Link will actually moon.
TA anons, how high is the % of it not being an inverse head and shoulders pattern?
I mean it sure does look like it.
But
I don't trust TA on cryptos.
Why should it be different this time and actually meet our expectations?

>>51467275
I actually have less because I diversified into their partners ALBT. Still a decent investment though.

>>51469546
TA will be irrelevant this time around due to institutions flooding in and staying there. LINK is an enterprise middleware infrastructure token that some NEETs happened to hear about first. When the big boys start pouring in after SmartCon, it’s going to pump more than TA can predict

>>51469532
look at the eth/link chart. Chad move was to sell link for eth in aug 20 and buy back now.

>>51466544
checked and nice. I bought a couple hundred myself the other day. It's a good feeling and no mistake

>>51469695
>Just sell the top and buy the bottom bro!

>>51469532
>Was Chainlink dependent on Ethereum switching over to a proof of stake mechanism?
This is generally assumed to be the case but it's not clear why. Sergey has mentioned that they wanted to wait until nodes were profitable until releasing staking but by his own admission they reached that point some time ago. Maybe there are some higher level economics Ari dreamed up that make ETH staking necessary as a precondition for LINK staking to keep everything game-theoretically perfect but otherwise idk.

>>51469725
You still have a chance before we test 9 dollars again

>>51468495
I bet you cant recognise a bot when yoy see one ranjesh, anon was just emphasizing the importance of crosschain interoperability and Privacy in the cryptospace which are obviously two very important factors for mainstream adoption.

>>51469836
how does crosschain interoperability "always scale"? it doesn't even exist yet and interoperability between various L1s or L2s is completely unrelated to "scaling" of each individual blockchain
"transaction privacy" also doesn't "Scale", not to mention that it doesn't exist either unless we're talking about permissioned centralized blockchain systems
brainlets

>>51469695
Ya, I keep telling Jeff Bazos he should have sold all his amazon stock at the exact top of the tech bubble and bought oil stocks, and then bought back into amazon just before the oil bust....what a retard he is, stay poor Jeff Bazos!

>>51466660
sorry to break it to ya but link can stay the same price while btc crashes, making OPs graph correct. dont mislead people that chain goes up in USD when we are comparing it to btc.

>>51469834
I'm already all in

>>51469695
when to sell eth/Link chart? at ATH?

>>51469899
>interoperability between various L1s or L2s is completely unrelated to "scaling" of each individual blockchain
>interoperability between
>individual blockchain
That's the point retard. If blockchains can't scale, you can still create a network of multiple chains specializing in different areas. Interoperability is a must in this scenario.

>>51469815
I could see a few possibilities: 1 They just didn’t want to risk an issue with the merge causing issues with the aggregator contract at layer 1 that would somehow result in a Chainlink node being slashed incorrectly. 2. they wanted to be able to roll out staking in a way where nodes could be Eth validators/proposers, Chainlink oracle operators, and arbitrum validators while staking across all layers. 3 they wanted staking to release with Deco and CCIP and again wanted to make sure there were no issues with Eth resulting from Merge before opening the floodgates on cross chain requests.

>>51466102
kek, get real LINKcel

>>51471739
i think i just figured out another reason as well
we all know that link has been at least partially infiltrated by the wef, blackrock, and esg scores and one of the next big pushes is for decentralized crop insurance to fight global warming
how can you get the public to swallow the logic of using blockchain to fight global warming when everyone knows how wasteful POW is?
that's right, you wait until POS comes out

>>51467511
just do it and forget about it
1000 is a sui anyway so you're getting there

>>51466102
LINK be making my balls hard with its pamps, I hope things go back to normal to 2021 run and then these low cap gems like VRA, Azero, Metis and Ride gonna milk me the profits I lost on that stoopid LUNA downturn. Good thing that South Korean authorities have released arrest warrant on him.

>>51470266
When it reaches that level it’ll probably break through to be honest

>>51467589
I remember reading that and thinking it will never go to $10.

>>51472485
>get them to swallow it
Kek, any plebs that believe in the climate change bullshit don't give a shit about that kind of hypocrisy.

>>51473252
I think you’ll be proven seriously wrong

>>51473364
Anthropogenic global warming actually is laughable though. All you have to do is zoom out to see that we well within normal variations. Any actual warming would be indistinguishable from noise. The reality is that global warming is just another scheme to control energy markets, and thereby control the global economy. Except this time people will support it because they think you’re saving the world.

>>51467589
Impressive desu. Not that I buy his prediction that Link will pump if macros remain this fucked, but he did nail the greater market timeline perfectly.

>>51467813
He said he thought insiders would frontrun the November swift integration

>>51473681
I disagree, although I do think it’s overblown, but it doesn’t matter. I’m not talking about reality, I’m talking about the perception of reality- the stories we tell ourselves.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2022/05/24/countries-on-the-cusp-of-carbon-markets

>>51474306
>digital MRV
From the world bank link
> The key to successfully reducing global GHG emissions through carbon markets could be digital infrastructure that keeps verified data secure and ensures that reductions are accurately accounted and tracked.

>This digital infrastructure comprises Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) systems with GHG emissions and emission reductions data linked to national or international Registries. New and fast evolving technologies– such as blockchain technology – can further help ensure transparency and that carbon credits can only be claimed by one country: either the country that avoided or removed the GHG emissions, or the country that bought it in the form of a carbon credit for different uses.

>>51468748
The bank metaverse that CryptoXpress is building could increase demand for its one-stop service. What do you think?

>>51474437
I am inside moderation circles and will ping your IP and come to kill you

>>51474437
that company has a 15k 24h trading volume, so it's basically dead.
Why do even mention that one?

>>51474487
elegant solution anon. shame you wasted it on a pajeet emulating bot kek

Is it a good time to get into Link now ?

>>51474632
The second best time since 2017

>>51474632
nah shoulda bought at 52. not very biz like getting in now

>>51466102
Fingers crossed anon. First we gotta get above 4000 sats resistance

>>51469532
Because now the MEV mafia are out of the game.

>>51467906
By the way those delays were the reason why the initial announcement in January of staking and CCIP was not followed by the real product release.
POS was a requirement for the finance industry to use ETH and blockchains, and Sergey silently delayed the feature releases because of the merge delays.

It's finally coming to an end now.

>>51475032
>POS was a requirement for the finance industry to use ETH and blockchains
any more info on this?
is it because of the energy issue or something else?

>>51474364
did we ever even talk about this?
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/373781615365676101/pdf/Blockchain-Interoperability.pdf
>cmd+f "chainlink"
>4 matches

>>51475271
wake me up when this is actually implemented and not another whitepaper.

>>51475313
hope I can wake you up in just over two weeks

>Number go up because..... it just will ok!

I love link. But it won't go up yet. It's too soon

>>51475065
more transactions per second, so now their security is less. all blocks made rn were from a couple of rich conpanies. rn the traditional banking system is more decentralized then eth. welcome to globohomo, youll own nothing and be happy.

>>51469899
You essentially just stated the problem and why it we need crosschain interoperability and privacy.

>>51475325
not getting hopes up with link progress over years not weeks.

>>51469899
Do you even understand what scaling means.

>>51471658
Finally someone gets it, having blockchain solve several problems will only be possible if multichains access is seamless and interoperable.

>>51468435
>DAO token like RAIL.
I wonder where all the talks about DAO went but I believe they are still the best way to grow a stronger community and of cause railgun is one top privacy focused project.

>>51467340
Your leveraged $70 position will not make much of a difference unfortunately.

>>51468740
I think you might be retarded anon.

>>51474559
Kek. Some how reminds of the good old days when link wasn't a 110% sure bet. Now link and biz both have become predictable. That being link gonna make it biz not gonna make it. We're just waiting for the timeline to catch up

>>51474306
The age of narratives required common myths. Millenials are the last generation with a somehow common myth, zoomers and alpha are fractioned deeply in their perception of reality.

>>51466102
>>51466133
>>51466160
>>51466161
>>51466496
>>51466525
>>51466544
>>51466554
>>51466595
>>51466660
>>51466717
>>51466847
>>51466979
>>51467132
>>51467182
>>51467275
>>51467288
>>51467340
>>51467427
>>51467511
>>51467526
>>51467576
>>51467589
>>51467625
>>51467660
>>51467751
>>51467813
>>51467906
>>51467984
>>51468028
>>51468203
>>51468336
>>51468354
>>51468376
>>51468435
>>51468446
>>51468476
>>51468482
>>51468495
>>51468599
>>51468609
>>51468610
>>51468622
>>51468624
>>51468643
>>51468682
>>51468685
>>51468719
>>51468721
>>51468735
>>51468737
>>51468740
>>51468748
>>51469401
>>51469481
>>51469532
>>51469546
>>51469659
>>51469690
>>51469695
>>51469723
>>51469725
>>51469815
>>51469834
>>51469836
>>51469899
>>51469914
>>51470239
>>51470263
>>51470266
>>51471658
>>51471739
>>51471761
>>51472485
>>51472921
>>51473106
>>51473136
>>51473186
>>51473252
>>51473364
>>51473681
>>51473940
>>51474306
>>51474364
>>51474437
>>51474487
>>51474549
>>51474559
>>51474632
Overly optimistic Chainlink Discord shill thread. Right on time. How's the shift going, troons? Would hate to spoil it for you and make Sergey mad at you again.. :)

2x by 2024 is bullish?
Crypto changed

>>51478847
That's a lot more than 2x friendo, you may want to learn how to read a chart sometime.

WGMI
$8.88 EOD

if bitcoin could just stop shitting the bed for once while we pump that would be great!

>>51478847
Oh NO. Haha

>>51478985
DJ 2bags. If it is not $8.88 EOD I demand you deposit 1 LINK into my account.

>>51479740
Stop fucking begging every god damn thread, give me 500 link to dip my nutsack on this faggots face.
0x6E645BE8D89f59F6Fd193c315A50F375ab56B3DA

>>51479772
lol.
1) Ive never received anything. This is just a way of saying "put up or shut up"

2) If I was begging I would be a greedy fuck and ask for the amount you just did with my address flapping in the wind of which you will surely be banned for.

3) y u mad tho

>>51479829

>>51475065
Because of ideology.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/ethereum-merge-crypto-currency-sustainability/

Do you remember the environmental fud by the Pope and Elon last year during the BTC crash?

PoW is red = bad and PoS is green = good = ecology

It also allows some improvements, and it's better to wait for a final version of the protocol before deploying all your high risk contracts.

>>51479829
>Poo in loo
I don't care you post your address and "demand" 1 link every thread it's tired and no different than just begging.

Just stop it and I won't have a problem otherwise get fucked.

>>51479921
cry more nigger bitch.

By the power of KEK I summon 42

>>51479931
>Begs for money
>lashes out when told to stop
Fuck you indian fuck go scam some baby boomers or whatever you do in your off time and get the FUCK off this board.

>>51479947
cringe. go back to twitter

>>51479954
nigger tongue my anus.

>>51479966
Only niggers beg.

>>51479970
>posts his address and asks for 500 link
Congrats. you are the biggest nigger.

>>51479984
You tagged me first begging for money nigger, if you're gonna do it small do it big or don't do it at all, also get fucked you tranime begging troon what a fucking shocker.

>>51479987
couldnt hear you over how nigger you were by your own logic!

>>51479994
>Begs every day in every link thread
>changes his pictures and their metadata so he can't be tracked through the archive
>becomes unwound when exposed
Look you fucking troon you've shit on us for a year and now you beg for money I see through this bullshit and anyone who's been here for longer than a month should as well now mods do you job.

>>51480000
what a waste of quads.
but stay mad. You are powerless and I love it.
But also Ive never done what youve done here. >>51479772 lol, Cant wait to see if you you get banned and I do or dont.

>>51480000
Checked

>>51480019
I don't read chimp sorry now get off the board beggar you have no opinion here you are literally a tranny grooming troon and my quads of truth prove it.

>>51480034
no u fgt.

>>51480000

>>51480000
Nice quads. I think something is going on, with LINK of course.

>>51480210
It's our time, I predicted this earlier this year.
It's our time anon, prepare.

8

>>51475871
>multichain
ORE ID got this for asset management across multichain.

>>51480000
think i'm gonna check this one

>>51480019
also lick my butthole you stupid fucking idiot

>>51480411
Checked.

It’s interesting the price

>>51466102
its going to reject off that dynamic resistance and breakdown ultimately resulting in a fakeout because the token isnt needed

what value does the token bring?

>>51480504
What value does any token bring? You can gamble on it, retard.

>>51480529
That's about the type of response I was expecting

I lost 10k link on celsius

>>51480529
Gamble? Your bags will fizzle out in no time Rajesh. I am keen on projects with real value, like asset and identity management, just anything with real life solutions other than memes. kek

>>51480553
Here's something you weren't expecting: Nigger.

>>51467589
it would be more impressive if it was predicted before the bull run was almost over, otherwise it sounds like cope for underperfoeming

>>51475871
We will get there, I believe the crypto space has evolved and there are tools or protocols offering multichains access from a single point without having to expose keys or seedphrases, you just got to dyor.

>>51471658
I am sure desu doesn't even understand the concept of Blockchain or interoperability and how they are related. I wish I could school him using ore protocol as an example.

>>51480581
Hey fren what projects are you looking at for identity management? Have got ENS and ORE anything new I am missing out on?.

I have 30k link.
Will I make it?

STOP THE PUMP

>>51480753
In 3 years

>>51480776
fud

>>51480753
If you check my quads.

>>51480557
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA BULGARIANS WIN YET AGAIN