/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51370173
They are gonna list of for normies to pump our butts.. I mean bags

>>51370184
If you look at their wallet; there is all sorts of activity happening.

Good find. Wagmi lunchads

fuck ya anons, I have plays in lunc, wluna, and lunc over on osmo. 3 different kind of plays with 1 token, who could ask for more.

>>51370173
My cock is throbbing

>>51370173
2 bad Lunc is going to zero. They’ve sucked the bone dry

>>51370628
You sucked your mom dry

Is wluna getting pegged to 2una?

>>51370699
I keep hearing this and have seen zero reason to believe that even though I have shitloads of wluna on ps.

And why hasn't WLUNA become completely worthless yet after the bridge apparently closed? Remember last week how everyone was saying to unwrap? Looks like there are still a lot of big holders; Gemini, Coinbase, etc.

>>51370838
They are probably reusing the wluna contract. Its literally the most corrupt path possible.
Reuse it, make it look like laziness. OOpsies I am holding a ton of wluna. Sell. Oopsies, 2una crashed, we must save it!, do you know where a lot of luna money is!? In LUNC, quick better merge. Then when the merge is done, oopsies, I was holding a bunch of the cheaper token and now its worth 1000x because of the merge ---> cash out.

>>51370924
do kwon is a trillionaire in the making and mark my words once he gets there all investigation into him will stop.

>>51370924
But could it really happen? Is it really feasible for Gemini and Coinbase etc to "make" tens of billions of dollars like that?

Bumping for visibility. Why are the big exchanges still holding the ERC-20 version of LUNC?

found this 0x6ee1e3a55eff7d6bc84ace9e478920f4beeeae7b looks to be a fake contract but there are massive buys, not sure what to make of it

Holding a million just in case something fucky happens with it

>>51372116
That's what I mean... if they are buying then it must be for a reason?

>>51372141
Me too. Holding 2M WLUNA in my Metamask wallet.

>>51372268
I have no idea at this point anon. It could be a scam and these guys are just really dumb. Early eth holders throw money around like its nothing. This contract seems like its a scam straight up though, its called LUNC 2.0 what even could that be?

>>51372116
Interestingly, the supply is set at 10 billion, which is the stated goal for LUNC after the burns.

>>51370805
I left 1m wluna wrapped when i transferred to lunc just in case the schizos are right.

>>51372610
I've got ~44,000 left on Coinbase, it'd be hilarious if this thing pegs to WLUNA2.

>>51372610
Here's another

>>51372624
What are these screenshots from? Did someone really sell WLUNA at LUNA 2 prices?

>>51372618
Apparently there's a smart contract on place that already does just that. That's why you can't buy it anywhere or shuttle lunc to wluna. Anywhere you can find the price on it is either lying to you or stopped updating the price when the fork happened. With all the fuckery surrounding this chain I almost believe it

>>51372624
>>51372610
we need to see these on chain, I have seen them floating around, but we cant even see the txn id or the wallet to verify on chain data I guess we can check the contract and go to the date and find it manually, I will start searching

>>51372633
Some schizo called @zkdomains on twitter. Was a wluna dev I guess

>>51372648
>>51372647
>>51372642
>>51372633
and when are these prices supposed to equalize and update?

>>51372647
Ty Based smart anon. I just save inflammatory pictures

>>51372653
If it's in fact real I can only imagine the level of effort to keep this from getting out. My bet is on never.

>>51372653
no idea yet, thats been my biggest question. I will update with what I find on chain soon

wluna will be the biggest play of 2022

coinbase will pull of a massive jew move when they peg it to loona v2

Can I hold it on metamask or is it better on an exchange for some reason?

so im running into dead ends here
0xD0686C64334C9277836cB5AED1eeF01640Ab7E05
this is the wallet that the 2nd txn came to. we can see the luna come in
0x139f8bafa23d0671f374da62b45a5dd27351f6ef66f84d272815a4a6544ec186
(I think this is the txn)
but I cant make heads or tails of whats happening, mainly because of the bridge being used so the trail goes cold. The originating txn ID on the 2nd pic is
0x9f2795938afc36214edfcbc79a5fa06e1342566faaf8982f83373cf419a3dd6b
but It doesnt pull anything up on etherscan. I dont believe I fat fingered anything.

>>51373087
I am starting to think that the txns listed are the result of an oracle error. Cant be sure though, I am not well versed in the luna ecosystem I am trying to find more as I go here.

>>51373099
Thanks anon!

does anyone know where those pictures came from? Like what site can I go and grab info in that format. The more I think about it the less I understand. The pic says the txn went from luna to eth but has a "initiatingtxnid" that is eth formatted. Not sure how that comes to be.

bumping an interesting thread

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x139f8bafa23d0671f374da62b45a5dd27351f6ef66f84d272815a4a6544ec186#eventlog
also why does it look like there is already a burn on chain? I know they made a burn address but some of these txns seem like the burn is baked in

>>51373099
>>51373087
Thank you anon. Something weird is definitlt going on.

>>51373135
Wormhole.com/explorer

right now I am trying to find the contract for that terra bridge that is listed, its a terra address that ends in r2sf from that 2nd picture

>>51373209
awesome, ty anon this helps a ton, literally found that bridge I just mentioned in the first 2 seconds of having that page open.

https://wormhole.com/explorer?txId=0x9f2795938afc36214edfcbc79a5fa06e1342566faaf8982f83373cf419a3dd6b

for anyone following along, didnt realize that wormhole was its entirely own thing, txn ids look like eth txns

ok to recap now:
we have the txn that xferred the luna from lunc to ethereum.
https://wormhole.com/explorer?txId=0x9f2795938afc36214edfcbc79a5fa06e1342566faaf8982f83373cf419a3dd6b
Here we have the wallet that received the luna
0xd0686c64334c9277836cb5aed1eef01640ab7e05
In the wallet we can clearly see that there has been no sales, the wallet is hodling.
Going to call this an oracle error.

>>51373256
This is what I thought too. What explains the price discrepancy though? Afaik there's no wrapped version of luna2 yet right?

>>51373288
nice dubs, thanks for clearing all this up anon. i'll stop posting the schizo evidence from now on

>>51373291
No there is not. Which is the strange part. So where was the oracle getting its info. Also there is the weird burns on some of the lunc txns on ethereum so while no one was selling at an instant 4000x gain, theres a lot of things still in question.

>>51372598
Are you talking about InitialSupply?

>>51370173
Guys I bought WLUNC on Osmosis because it's cheap as fuck. If they do something retarded with WLUNC on ETH will they do it on all the other chains including OSMO?

>>51373382
I have a bag there too, They closed IBC transfers which is why its so cheap, you cant move it out of your wallet at all atm. They attempted to pass a vote to reopen IBC, I think it passed but there was a technical issue stopping them from reopening (I think story isnt clear from what I read) Everything I see talking about it says to expect it back open in june of 2023...which seems random and weird. I am guessing that if the price starts to trend back towards the market price they will reopen it, but who knows. I would follow the news closely

so guys I want to point something out to you. this contract 0x6ee1e3a55eff7d6bc84ace9e478920f4beeeae7b
called lunc 2.0, seems like an obvious scam however people are buying in. Ok so check out the holders list.
https://etherscan.io/token/0x6ee1e3a55eff7d6bc84ace9e478920f4beeeae7b#balances
You can clearly see that coinbase has some!! omgz right!? theyre the 2nd largest holder, so go deeper into the txn and check it out, make sure it wasnt just airdropped
https://etherscan.io/token/0x6ee1e3a55eff7d6bc84ace9e478920f4beeeae7b?a=0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43
dope, it says swap, coinbase bougt lunc 2.0!! omgz its not a scam!!! ok so actually go into the txn
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa42a77c008f844d7d75931f1b558a78af55bffe621058d8782e49c428dbb1164
you can see a from address of
0x35137fa2bdd8a98d5b0c05041d0c8b38f17c83d7
NOT coinbase. I believe that whoever this was had a send to on the output of the swap, so they initiated the trade and had the output sent directly to the coinbase wallet so anyone who didnt take a deeper look would think that coinbase was the purchaser. These scams are getting more sophisticated anons, take care...unless I am wrong and this is the new wluna contract, which I nearly 100% doubt.

>>51373472
if you go back into the txns for that last wallet I posted you find this txn
0x358d4a970ffb172cb2fd4b95c8935b018e123733f59499c02336f0cbc59959c7
the genesis txn for this lunc 2.0 contract. This guy has been cashing out hundreds of eth from those unaware, pass this message along to everyone.

how the fuck do I keep getting dubs
>>51373488
>>51373311
>>51373288
>>51373099
>>51370533

>>51373431
But opening the bridge would restore the peg due to arbitrage. I'm more worried they're gonna do something with Luna wormhole to peg it with LUNA 2 and only do it with ETH LUNC
>>51373472
If it was the new LUNA 2 Wormhole address they wouldn't call it LUNC 2.0 Token unless they're trying to trick us with reverse psychology

>>51373510
I think they were worried about the LPs that were tied to lunc originally, if they were tied to it as the price plummeted, all of the liquidity from the osmo system would have been drained along with the money from lunc, so we would have had two dead networks instead of 1, I dont believe they want to open the bridge again until things are stable and there is no chance of draining money from the osmo system.

I have 225,000 wrapped luna from the original crash, I was lazy and just stopped paying attention 2 months ago. Did I make the best move... By making no move????

>>51373572
Unironically yes. You HODL'd without even realizing it.

>>51371761
The fact that these big exchanges are still holding billions of WLUNA is telling.

>>51372858
You might be right. WLUNA seems like an even bigger gamble than LUNC... and if it pays off...

>>51373472
great detective work anon - so just wondering, what do you make of this holders list on the real WLUNA (or wrapped LUNC as they're calling it), which does have Coinbase holding 14b+ coins?

https://etherscan.io/token/0xd2877702675e6ceb975b4a1dff9fb7baf4c91ea9#balances

or maybe i'm retarded and missed something, wouldn't' be the first time kek

>>51373674
its weird, if you try to follow the txns of wluna that come and go to that wallet they move between what looks like regular (investor) wallets and other coinbase wallets, I see coinbase10 (which is the holder) and coinbase 4 so far involved. I dont know what the #s signify if anything. Trying to figure it out is hard because there is no trading going on on coinbase. With binance, we pretty much know whats happening because CZ will close transfers and deposits on the token and then we see a flurry of movement that we shouldnt see with everything shut down. Coinbase hasnt shut anything down but trading. So It is either investors hoping(or knowing) that coinbase will be reopening trading (they will also ask for a minimum to be deposited before trading so liquidity is built) or its actually coinbase accumulating to be able to provide liquidity / capitalize on the price movement as an investment. But there is no doubt that there is a lot of movement in their wallets for wluna.

>>51373737
That sounds extremely bullish for WLUNA holders.

wait so if im getting this right, wluna may be repegging to 2una? If so where do i get a baggie of this badboi just in case?

>>51373737
wild digits kek, and appreciate the insight anon - i only have LUNC, no WLUNA so was curious to the activity - but i think you're right that exchanges are gearing up to either re-list or possibly prep for off-chain burns of some sort - who knows but i can say SOMETHING is definitely going on

>>51373779
I will dig a bit more into the bouncing txns tomorrow but I am thinking that when I do I will find that a lot of those txns have this baked in burn that I kept finding randomly. I dont know about you, but even with eths gas prices being decently low, I do not want to be paying the kind of fees that are involved in sending my tokens from address to address for the hell of it. I have a feeling that CB is testing a burn on their side exactly like you mentioned.
>>51373778
thats what were thinking. One piece of "evidence" has kind of been debunked in this thread however it doesnt change the biggest piece of the puzzle that we can see which, where is wluna2.0 and why are people finding so many references to lunc in luna2.0 stuff and vice versa? Its all very strange.

>>51372642
>That's why you can't buy it anywhere
I can buy some
is anyone interested in how? it's kinda easy

>>51373832
I think I'll buy a small 200-400k bag of WLUNA just in case

>>51373870
where buy?

>>51373864
I'll just say it
>go to coin market cap wrapped luna
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/wrapped-luna-token/
>click the metamask button to add the coin to metamask
>click the added coin
>swap
>click the switchy button to make it buy
>but with eth or whatever
>send to coinbase (optional)
kinda easy
just bought 100k at ~$45

eth fees are gay as fuck but it works to buy if you want wrapped luna (lunc)

>>51373915
I thought you could buy on Uniswap I don't know in at work atm
>>51373864
On Coinbase?

>>51373915
see >>51373926
I might scoop up more

>>51373501
Your being a fucking prophet right now that's why

>>51373932
metamask swap feature
just add the coin from coinmarket cap and click the added coin in metamask and do swap

>>51373926
That's how I did it too.
There shouldn't be a need to keep it in the coimbase wallet, right?

>>51373986
I dunno I actually like coinbase and haven't had any issues in years using it

>>51373986
I had actually moved my wlunc to metamask to swap to native lunc, and then decided to reacquire some wluna. I had some confusion over metamask calling the wlunc, "lunc", even though I had the right contract. So I sent it back to the CB wallet to see if it was correct, and it was deposited into the same wallet I initially had it in, but it was pending status for a long time.

>>51374061
just add from coinmarketcap
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/wrapped-luna-token/
it worked for me at least
sent to coinbase wallet and received it but only took like 2-3min to receive

>>51374083

>>51370628

lmao you will always be poor and you will never be a woman. Kill yourself faggot.

>>51373926
I also got some terraclassicUSD using this method just now
$~25 was like 350 UST so if repegs that's a decent profit but probably not the same as buying wluna if that shoots up

>>51373501
Because you're the Herald of Truth blessed by higher beings

>>51373501
pure chance

>>51373986
I'm sending half of mine to Coinbase just incase it's a Coinbase only deal

>>51373986
>>51374388
But if you have WLUNA in your Metamask wallet; you should be able to send it to your Coinbase wallet at any time?

>>51373501
I appreciate this investigaton anon, very thorough and very spoopy findings.
1) wtf is Lunc 2.0?
2) If they want to do something with wrapped lunc would it not make sense for them to reopen the bridge seeing as wlunc is just a contract on the eth chain in lieu of your lunc on the terra chain? I dont see how they can have one without the other.

>>51374444

Ok I'm new to the whole crypto scene and I'm trying to wrap my head around what's going on. I read through this deep dive twice. (Great fucking work btw) and I still don't quite get it. From the tone I'm getting there's something fishy going on. I just understand money is being moved and "changed"? I see this is related to lunc and big things are happening with that coin. I'm going to guess some manipulation of some sort? Would this happen to have anything to do with the massive dip that happened yesterday?

>>51374516
Hey, I'm OP and I've been tracking WLUNA for months since I bought a stack on Coinbase when it initially nosedived months ago. Coinbase suspended trading on WLUNA soon thereafter. I didn't bother selling or converting my stack since it was so cheap, and recently there was immense FUD about WLUNA becoming completely worthless since a bridge was going to be closed, or disabled, therefore severing its connection to LUNC. There has also been a conspiracy theory that since there is no ERC-20 version of the new LUNA that WLUNC could theoretically get re-pegged to it. And now we have all the strange activity with Coinbase and other exchanges accumulating WLUNA A.K.A. WLUNC.

Best thing to do is try and grab a stack of WLUNA/WLUNC and simply hold.

>>51374548
Oh crap. Ok that was a very good explanation thank you very much. Unfortunately I can't get either of those. (I just have lunc) there's a lot of coins I see everyone posts about but I can't get them. Great find. You not only gave me amazing information and simplified it for me, but a great deal of insight into this whole crypto space. Thank you very much!

>>51374584
You just buy ETH, send it to your metamask wallet, and swap it. If you can get LUNC you can get ETH.

>>51374548
Thanks for your work OP! Just picked up a little 500k WLUNA gamble bag.

>>51374584
If you look a little further up in the thread; it looks like there's a way to buy WLUNA via Metamask swap.

>HE DIDN'T EVEN BUY THE WRAPPED SUPERSIZED V3.3.71.2 PASTRAMI EDITION OF THE COIN XDDDDD

Incredible how out of all the threads on this trash board this is the only one with good discussions when the fudders are sleeping. Keep up the good work boys

>>51374614
>>51374636

Thank you guys. I didn't even have a meta mask wallet so I have to wait a bit I'm assuming to move things to it. I can just buy some eth in the meantime.

>>51374743
Seriously. System won't even let me post because it thinks I'm spamming but I just wanna discuss this with you guys.

Havent read a thread this interesting in a while, imagine the potential for mooning if the conspiracy turns true and it does get a repeg...Thing is i've seen one to many opportunities fly by me over the years on this board. I think its worth a cheeky 500usd

bumping my own conspiracy thoughts, checking throughout the day whenever LUNC pumped WLUNC would always pumped 5-10% higher. If someone wanted to mask buys to not create suspicion they would do it during pumps so it seems "organic"

Was there ever any info on the WLUNA FUD from a few days back where they were trying to get people to convert it to LUNAC? Seems like it came and went within a few days.

could the recent 2una pumps be a preparation for the repeg desu? the pump so the price doesn't go belly up when it happens.

>>51370699
>>Big if big

>>51374775
That's how I'm thinking; I'm willing to take the risk. If WLUNA somehow skyrockets, and I already sold or converted it, I'd never forgive myself.

>>51374920
That might be to do with the circulating supply? I read somewhere that LUNC has 5.5T while WLUNC has 500B.

>>51375058
Yeah, it came and went very suddenly. I thought it was bizarre how there was such intense FUD to convert WLUNC to LUNC or else you'd be left with a completely worthless stack. The thing is, even if the bridge has closed or been disabled, why are there still exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase holding billions upon billions of WLUNA as evident on Etherscan? Surely they wouldn't let their huge stacks become worthless. Maybe they know something we don't?

>>51373926
FUCK SPAM CHECK

faggots you made me buy 60K of WLUNC

wagmi

I swapped my eth on metamask for 200K Wluna, am IGMI?

Anyhow, OP you're a superb faggot, thank you for your investigative work and explained so very well for my smoothbrain.
Cheers.
Woth the gamble.

Brainlet here; when I try to swap ETH for WLUNC on Metamask as per >>51373926
it switches to LUNA. Still the same token?

>>51375613
Yes that's the point, we're all hopefully buying LUNA at LUNC prices.

>>51375613
Seems to be interchangeably called LUNA and WLUNC

what's the WLUNA shizo suicide stack? what's the make it stack?

>>51375866
I suppose 1M suicide-stack, 10M make-it stack... but if WLUNA were to actually peg to the new LUNA then even 2M or 3M would be a make-it tier at the current price USD.

>>51375889
Way too high wtf? That's $6mm and $60mm respectively

>>51375889
i converted 10% of my lunc to wluna. i’d say more like 100k sui 1m make it in case it pegs. lets be real, this is a really schizo gamble within a gamble.

>>51375889
If people suddenly had millions of 2una at market price the coin would get sold into dust kek another Do Kwon rugjob

>>51375938
I meant 1M or 10M WLUNA; current price is $0.0004441 USD

>>51375974
Yes, I agree. If the peg were to actually happen then even 100K of WLUNA could be life changing money. I only said 1M suicide-stack, and 10M make-it stack since they were both relatively cheap months ago when WLUNA and LUNC nosedived. The risk to reward ratio with WLUNA is even greater than holding LUNC, so it's a gamble worth taking in my opinion.

>>51376007
yeah but only shizos hold WLUNA right now. there was a great effort in letting everyone know that WLUNA soon will become worthless. so maybe in reality this is just the path they are gonna take and a few shizos are gonna become rich in the process, which is whatever to them. crazier things have happened.

>>51376007
I don't know if it's going to be that straightforward... the circulating supply of LUNC is supposedly 5.5T whereas the circulating supply of WLUNC is 500B... and I wouldn't be surprised if the closing-the-bridge FUD converted a lot of holders to LUNC. It will be interesting to see what happens. I'm not sure what the circulating supply of the new LUNA is, but I heard before the crash that the old LUNA was 300M. I guess even if it were to be re-pegged; WLUNA would only tank the price of the new LUNA if everyone were to unwrap and sell in a sort of avalanche.

so we all know that metamask and coinbase don't have the best reputation for a good reason. what if they actually peg WLUNA to LUNA but cuck out the WLUNA holders by doing a WLUNA - LUNC - LUNA swap first on the "exchange level"? is there a way to store it more securely, so nobody can touch it? On an exchange, you don't own even own the wallet/keys. Do you on metamask? Is there an alternative?

>>51376075
Yes, on Metamask you own your own keys/seed phrase. That way you have "control" over your crypto rather than by using a centralised exchange. Coinbase say: "Your ability to store, send, and receive WLUNA is not impacted."

>>51376166
figured, thanks. think I'm just gonna leave it on meta for now or do a 50/50 split later as the other anon said.

>>51373572
I hope you become absurdly rich solely for this reason, anon
Because that would be funny

>>51373767
So, what's the schizo name for holders of wluna?
The Wlunc Warriors?

>>51376273
The UnFUDables.

ok lads i'm not sure yet but ok i'll take the risk. The thing is, if the price goes up to 2una's then it's bound to go down again quickly. A limit order on 1 inch between 3 and 6$ might make sense. What do you think, do you have a better idea?

>>51375889
>>51375938

Yeah don’t listen to this tard

100k WLUNA Sui
1mm WLUNA Make it
10mm WLUNA Fuck You money

>>51370924
mybe thats the reason why 2una is going up, they need as much liquidity as possible

>>51376383
correct. this theory is what made me buy a small bag.

Just to add some clarification ... I had a Million plus WLUNA on coinbase. Sucked it down to metamask and then moved it to gemini It's still WLUNA and lists on the gemini exchange as LUNA. I didn't try and move it directly to Gemini because initially I was going to unwrap it. The contract says it's Wrapped LUNA not 2LUNA. If there is an arb out there on osmosis or whatever go for it. But the wishful thinking that WLUNA=2LUNA is degenerate gambler thinking. It would be the funniest shit ever if it were true. However, Coinbase is going to have to relist WLUNA because a lot of their customers don't know how to move it. The whole reason for Coinbase is to make shit easy. It's for people to get into crypto without the fuckery of bouncing around metamasks and DEX's. They are going to have to give people the ETH or relist otherwise I smell a class action.

>they’re catching up

can anyone see if the math checks out here?

>>51376586
>Expecting the trading volume to stay the same when the 1.3% burn fee has been implemented.
Why on Earth would anyone keep day trading this? The volume will dry up, hype will be gone and the same bagholders who watched it go to 0 will watch it go to 0 AGAIN. This is an easy short for anyone who missed the short the first time.

>>51370805
THE VOICES IN MY HEAD TELL ME WLUNA WILL BE PEGGED TO 2UNA.

>>51376333
Czech'd

>>51376648
Read it again. It makes the assumption of 1 billion coins per day not 4 billion. Why would people keep trading it? A lot won't. They would stake it. Why would they stake it? Because it's now a deflationary coin they can earn a few bucks on. They will sell the staked reward coins, swap them for something else or re stake them based on market price. This is a moment is where you screw your courage to the sticking point. This is the moment where you decide you are going to make it or potentially lose a thousand bucks to a dead project. But it's not dead is it? It has more going for it than most coins. A real dev team working their asses off, an active community and it has survived the FUD, red herrings and rampant speculation.

gentlemen,
I am summoning atë, the ancient greek goddess of mischief, to bring us wluna riches
you're welcome

>>51377700
>green id and digits
yeah, I'm thinking she's here with us

>>51377700
checked

>>51375613
it will give you wluna

Wluna needs a general can someone bake it?

>>51377700
fuck, now I have to buy some eth and swap it for WLUNC.

buying wluna now is like buying shib in 2020

>>51376496

Coinbase holds a shit tonne of wluna for a reason. Never underestimate their greed. A peg to luna2 would be great for them.

>>51378215
>Coinbase holds a shit tonne of wluna for a reason.
what are the odds they just didn't unwrap it because they didn't have time or had no info on the bridges closing? I'm not saying the OP is wrong or anything, I'd love it to be true because I have a WLUNA bag as well, but are we maybe underestimating pure human incompetence here? WLUNA's price is so low that maybe the cexes now holding it didn't deem it worthy enough to unwrap? or maybe they have to hold it because moving it would get them sued by users whom those coins belong to?

>>51374548
I knew the WLUNA FUD was sketchy. It just didn't sit right with me; I knew it was BS despite the supposed evidence of the bridge closing.

>>51375058
It was really bizarre, didn't seem organic at all. I remember one thread where the OP had like 40-50 posts trying people to sell WLUNA.

>>51375128
>while WLUNC has 500B
would love to know the real numbers to know if a repeg is viable

>>51375505
There's no certainty about this but the WLUNA situation is really weird so it'd be criminal not to at least hold a small bag.

>>51378266
>what are the odds they just didn't unwrap it because they didn't have time or had no info on the bridges closing?
unironically nonexistent

>>51379016
>unironically nonexistent
well I hope you're right, I could buy a house from my little WLUNA bag if it somehow got synced to LUNA 2's price.

>>51376898
Jesus christ the bagholder bingo words. Im gonna add to my shorts on the next bounce.

>>51379048
We have the same exact goal anon. Funny that we're relying on a magical lotto ticket to make housing affordable.

>>51373665
I transfered my wluna to lunc because of burn hysteria :)

>>51379071
>Funny that we're relying on a magical lotto ticket to make housing affordable.
what can you do, the people in power rob their countries blind and offset their debts to the population. bloated corporatism and oligarchy at its finest. we're priced out of owning real estate despite record-breaking profits being achieved in every industry. it's all rigged. crypto is unironically one of the last ways to make it in this fucked up world.

>>51370838
>>51370924
I called this weeks ago too. Wluna won't depeg because of some technical aspect, because it is literally lunc but in the form of eth, it literally cannot become worthless without eth or lunc becoming worthless first. Always question pajeet fud.

>>51379098
You should give your coins to someone smarter and with a bigger cock so they don't lose it all to scammers and weak fud, maybe they'll even be nice and give you some back when it moons little guy ;)

THE VOICES IN MY HEAD SAY WLUNA IS GOING TO BE PEGGED TO 2UNA!

>>51376671
>>51380017
please make them stop.
>W...LUNA...TUNA
>W...LUNA...2UNA
>TUNA IS W IN LUNA
>W...LUNA...TUNA
>WLUNNNAAAA
>W...LUNA...TUNA
>W...LUNA...2UNA
>ITS TUNNNNAAAA
>W...LUNA...TUNA
>W...LUNA...TUNA
i can't sleep
>W...LUNA...TUNA
i put every penny into wluna
>W...LUNA...2UNA
i fucking hate tuna sandwhich bros
but all i hear is talk of moons and tuna, moons and tuna
>W...LUNA...2UNA
>W...LUNA...TUNA
ITS GOING TO BE PEGGED
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>51380101
I mean, I have WLUNC and LUNC. If WLUNC gets pegged to 2UNA that just means I'll have a shitton more money to buy more LUNC.

You guys honestly think they’ll just magically turn your less than a penny worth tokens into a few dollars worth per coin overnight, just because? It wouldn’t even be possible to sell that shit there would be no liquidity.

>>51380498
Also there are 500b wluna coins and 1 billion 2una coins. It wouldn’t work

>>51370173
Pretty much crazy the kind of information that is publicly visible on block explorers. No wonder there is a growing demand for privacy and shielding of transactions on it

>>51378163
Let's see where we are in six months or so, but I hope you're right.

>>51378215
I agree. These big exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase would have staff researching or figuring out what's best for them, and the higher-ups might even have access to Do Kwon himself via phone or chat, etc. They obviously know something if they are still accumulating and or holding a huge stack.

>>51378266
I don't think that's likely at all. It's not like these big exchanges are just 1 or 2 people; some of them have literally thousands of staff.

>>51378921
>>51378945
Like I said; it came and went very suddenly. Haven't seen any real mention of it in the last few days or so. It was very concentrated FUD for a short period of time. And the strangest thing of all is that seemingly nothing changed regarding WLUNA's price/peg to LUNC.

>>51378957
I'm not entirely sure on those numbers, just what I read somewhere else. To me the most bullish thing is that new LUNA doesn't have its own ERC-20 version yet.

>>51378966
I agree. Can't go wrong holding a bag of both LUNC and WLUNC. They're both lottery tickets but WLUNC has a potentially even bigger pay off.

>>51379071
>>51379106
It's a shame that hard work doesn't guarantee success. If something like WLUNA could buy me a house outright; it would only galvanise my position to never work for a wage again.

>>51379098
You can apparently buy WLUNA still via Metamask swap; just look further up in the thread.

>>51379239
It sort of reminded me of getting the vaccine a couple years ago; where it was a kind of peer-pressure thing. That's why I didn't get the vax, and I didn't convert or sell my WLUNA. Now nobody seems to care about coronavirus, and they even pretend like they never got triple-vaxxed either. It was FUD on a global scale.

>>51380498
>>51381042
Nobody knows what's going to happen. May as well hold a suicide-stack, just in case. The fact that these big exchanges are still accumulating and holding WLUNA is extremely bullish.

>>51372858
i think they will burn, so if you have 200 usd in wluna, they will burn it down to what it's worth as luna2.

>>51376166
The "control" comes into question considering how challenging it is for an average user to manage multiple keys and seed phrases; even worse when it is spread across multiple chains.

>>51376075
>On an exchange, you don't own even own the wallet/keys
I truly believe that identity management systems are underrated. By all means, users should be able to afford a single and secure authorization process for all their assets

Where are you even buying wluna

>>51382505
We all bought it on coinbase before they delisted it. The only place to buy it now is uniswap.

>>51373926
>https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/wrapped-luna-token/

What are the ETH fees now?
I'm new to this, traded shitcoins before but never messed with ETH tokens because of gas fee.

How much would it cost me in fees for transfer from binance to metamask and then swapping ETH for WLUNA?

>>51382505
Sushiswap

>>51383008
We're in a bear market so gas fees will be pretty reasonable. Just add $25-30 extra to what you want to buy just in case.

>>51383008
it was like $2-3 fees last night when I swapped for wluna so maybe try later if they're high now

>>51370628
It already went to zero anon. I know, I have zero dollars of it. It did peg to nula for a sec before they made it peg back to luna classic.

This link was posted in May shortly after the LUNA crash. I haven't seen anyone discussing it since then. Seems like it might be important.

>>51384006
I remember the day it crashed; I was about to buy 10,000 WLUNA for roughly $40 AUD. Then I decided against pulling the trigger, and was away from the PC for a few hours. When I came back; you could have easily bought several million WLUNA for $40 AUD. It all happened so fast, though. Best thing would have been to DCA over the course of several hours, rather than go all-in at the time since it just kept adding more and more zeroes after the decimal point.

>>51370173
>>51372648
I just looked up this guys Twitter account. Looks like he was all over it before I was.

>>51385903

>>51385934

>>51372610
>>51372624
Another one of these from zkDomains Twitter.

When will we know if WLUNA repegs to 2UNA?

>>51386073

>>51386200

>>51374548
yeah but how do you sell it when it goes up?

>>51378266
>they were just too lazy/ didn't know
Nigger this is coinbase they literally have to make as much money as possible at all times to please their shareholders. If they're doing something/anything, it's because they think it can make money. Also I'm sure they knew about the bridges closing. They probably have entire department based on gathering this type of info

>>51386168
There will probably be a big announcement, if it ever happens.

>>51386456
I hold my WLUNA on Metamask, so in theory I could convert it to Ethereum or send it from there back to Coinbase if they ever readded WLUNA back for trading, etc. I'm holding my stack regardless since I bought it for cheap.

>>51386674
so you literally wont be able to sell it? is this a huge joke? lol

>>51386724
There are probably other ways to sell, but I haven't looked into it to be honest. You do know you can sell Ethereum pretty much anywhere, right? And if WLUNC did actually get re-pegged to the new LUNA; then I imagine selling would be a lot easier than it is now.

Bump. This is my favorite thread currently on /biz/

ill throw my hat in the ring. i hold 20m wluna, following all of the twitter shit ive been following from zk and the likes, no one knows whats going on with it. the erc20 contract states it pegs to LUNA. not LUNC. its a reasonable assumption something will come of it. we might not be millionaires, but something will come of it. the contract does state it is tied to LUNA. but what do i know

>>51387848
What is keeping it pegged to lunc is what I want to know

Can someone explain why they think wrapped Lunc will suddenly become wrapped 2una? I feel like half the people in here don’t actually know what they’re talking about.

>>51388049
Because 2una doesn't have a wrapped coin and the code for wlunc still says wrapped luna. Either way if it pegs to one the question is where is the wrapped version for the other. I'm also a brainlet but that's my understanding.

>>51388049
>>51388097
I think it's mostly that the wrapped baboona contract code is written (and set in stone) that its pegged to the baboona token by name and not some form of contract address or code.

Fucking spam filter fuck you.

>>51387848
I agree. I think something will come of it and it seems like that, whatever it may be, it can only be good for WLUNA holders.

>>51388007
That closing-the-bridge FUD may have been to shake out as many WLUNA holders as possible? It is not completely out of the question that WLUNA gets re-pegged to the new LUNA if the contract is immutable?

>>51388049
Why isn't there an ERC-20 version of the new LUNA yet? And why are big exchanges still accumulating and or holding billions of WLUNA which are still currently worth millions of dollars even though they were meant to become completely worthless after the bridge to LUNC was closed a few days ago. If the contract is truly immutable; then they might have no choice but to peg WLUNA to the new LUNA?

>>51388329
This whatever token is using the name LUNA, that should be the price of wrapped LUNA.

>>51388379
This.

How do we make them honor this?

>>51388814
And this. It's on their website WLUNA is not luna but a token meant to track the price of LUNA.

>inb4 they dump everything just so they can merge w/o us becoming millionaires
yiddish tricks

>>51386200
Big if big

>>51374444

>>51388814
>>51388877
Interesting also how on CoinMarketCap WLUNA's ticker is "WLUNC" (with the logo as seen on Metamask), but on Coinbase it is still "WLUNA" (with a version of the old Luna logo) even though they both now call it "Wrapped LUNA Classic" of course.

>>51382352
that would cause a massive uproar since they can only do that in the CEX, they can't do that to all the wluna on peoples personal wallets

How did they change the name of luna to lunac? If you can just change a coin like that then what does it matter if wluna is tied to "luna" per the contract?

>>51382352
Legit fear. What wallet should I send my wluna to that will keep it wrapped and not unwrap it or list it as lunac? Is this wluna shitzo stratagey legit?
>buy wluna on goybase as luna goes to zero
>hodl wluna
>nula gets minted and wluna trading is suspended by all exchanges so goys don't get an easy 1000x
I am here
>move wluna off exchanges
>hodl until the time is right
>its happening
>wluna pegs to nula
>all wluna left on exchanges gets burned to match nula $ amount to prevent guys from getting an easy 1000x
>wluna off exchanges is unaffected
>hodl wluna in wallet
>convert wluna to nula
>move nula to an exchange to sell

>>51390742
metamask seems to be the best bet. less likely they fuck with your wluna than any exchange and you can (hopefully) still swap it if it moons, as opposed to hardware wallets

I am a brainlet, please tl;Dr for me. Who is this bullish for? Wkuna only? All Luna's? Only some of the Luna's?

>>51391328
Metamask it is then.

Is there any way to get WLUNA now? Defi? Anywhere?

I need to kyc my goybase and get my wluna to a metamask wallet. Guaranteed goybase will burn your wluna to a dollar amount matching luna classic when it pegs to nuluna.

>>51391935
Sushiswap and Uniswap worked for me yesterday. Uni had the best price at the time

GEMINI>COM you schizos. WLUNC is trading there.

>>51393427
No its not.

>>51393576
yes it is. the gemini luna is erc wrapped. I transferred to metamask this morning

>>51391935
see >>51373926
you can do ia swap in metamask easy

>>51393665
>the gemini luna is erc wrapped
How can you tell? Also you can't buy luna on gemini. Trading is suspended?

>>51393736

>>51393736
>>51394381

>>51394405
This is what I see. No way to tell if it's wrapped luna and trading is suspended.

>>51391328
What about goybase wallet?

>>51395225
They're goybases coins if they aren't in your wallet
They may decide to burn all held coins in an attempt to match the 2una supply as much as possible

you can buy wluna on coinbase wallet using uniswap or rubic exchange

>>51395349
They are in goybase wallet, not on the goybase exchange.
My question is if they still have access to my goybase wallet through some kikery even though they should be my keys.

>>51395367
You could also just swap on Metamask. Just make sure you have ETH to cover the fee to do so.

>>51395625
they should be safe

>>51390600
From what I understand any crypto or its ticker can theoretically be retitled like say a file or document could; but in the same way, that doesn't change the content of the file or document. It's just superficial. So even though WLUNA was renamed to WLUNC, and thus Wrapped LUNA Classic, the content, i.e. the contract, still uses the original crypto names and tickers.

Hey nice page 1. Would be a shame if somebody bumped an old thread onto it.

>>51370173

Just bought 200k wLUNC have absolutely no idea what I'm in for but we'll see.

>>51401138
well this should be what you have as of this moment if they were to honor the wrapped luna contract as it is written.

>>51394654
Use active trader on a desktop

>>51401138
Where?

>>51401203
dont bother with exchanges unless you wanna get kiked hard. buy from uniswap, just make sure you get the contract from cmc so you dont buy some scam instead.

>>51401203
Agreed with fren above uniswap is best it's sitting on my metamask do not trust any of these kiked CEXs.

>>51401197
Holy mother of baboona I might throw a few hundred into this.

>>51401197

That’s wrapped lunc? Why does it show the 2una logo tho? CA?

>>51401737
No, it's 2una, he just put it in that way to show if wlunc paired to 2una instead of lunc. That's the whole point of the thread, nobody's fucking sure whether wluna belongs to lunc or 2una.

>>51402417

Ahh ok. This shit is confusing af

The voices are still here…and they say…
…they say…
WLUNA WELL BE PEGGED TO 2UNA

Is trust wallet safe as meta maskwallet?

>>51370173
Post link now

so am i retarded or is 0xd2877702675e6cEb975b4A1dFf9fb7BAF4C91ea9 the contract in question

Explain in caveman terms here. We’re possibly getting new expensive coin for old shitty coin price?

>>51402979

Trust is legit. I use it 2nd most to metamask

>>51403083
yeah that’s the one

safe for w luna?

how safu is metamask for hodling - isnt ledger better?

>>51402989
https://etherscan.io/token/0xd2877702675e6ceb975b4a1dff9fb7baf4c91ea9#balances

And looks like parts of this thread are getting shared on Twitter.

>>51404926
zkDomains posting link to this thread.

>>51404926
I just wanna let everyone in here know I bought 1 mill WLUNC when it was still on Goybase and it’s still sitting in my Goybase account. Those 14 billion or so token are just retail investors in my same shoes

well since some twitter tranny faggots are lurking now ITT:

NIGGER FAGGOT NIGGER FAGGOT NIGGER FAGGOT
YOU WILL NEVERBBE A WOMAN
GAS JEWS GAS JEWS

>>51404959
rofl thats hilarious, first time crypto detective work I have done has ended up twitter.

>>51404926
Hey I made the screenshot. I really wish I could have used the actual names but it was triggering the spam filter. However saying baboona never set it off.

>>51404972
I don't know if it's that straightforward. And, as per the opening question and to paraphrase zkDomains: why would Coinbase update the label on the "Coinbase 10" hot wallet you can see on Etherscan, and not the previous hot wallet they used to hold WLUNA?

>>51405216
It’s hopium anon.

>>51405035

>>51405300
I agree.

>>51405300
>>51406809
Hopium or not what happened to code is law? When you bought wluna on Coinbase it clearly states you are not buying LUNA but an erc-20 token tracking the price of it. If DoKwon had been fine with NULA being called anything other than LUNA there wouldn't be any confusion but unfortunately he was not. Code says it should be tracking LUNA price which as of this post is $4.44.

>>51407106
Yes, but it seems too good to be true. I fear that the powers that be will try to fuck over the current WLUNA holders somehow. Nevertheless; I hold.