/biz/ - Business & Finance

Hedera Hashgraph

>>51329529
XRPL

>>51329529
> ICP
they have the best tech out there imo.

I’m not telling. It should be obvious by now. (It is, but mass formation psychosis is alive and well in “crypto”)

>>51332417
just a hint anon? im looking for different projects to research.

>>51332023
>>51332037
>>51332386
what makes these different?

>>51332442
Since you asked so nicely as opposed to sperging out, I would be happy to.
Ask yourself, what is important to the long-term viability of a blockchain?
Alternatively, where have eth and BTC struggled?
And, why have they been the two biggest successes?
Can these answers be reconciled?

>>51332442
>what makes these different?
Great question.

>>51332567
>what is important to the long-term viability of a blockchain?
There are a lot of factors here

>where have eth and BTC struggled?
I would say speed and scalability are the first things that come to mind among other things

>why have they been the two biggest successes?
Probably first mover advantage.

I'm still not getting which one you are trying to hint at, there are so many chains and so little time.

>>51332567
>>51332723
same anon here, I was phonefagging before now I'm at work.

>>51332774
>I would say speed and scalability are the first things that come to mind among other things
nailed it. Scalability (and with it speed) are extremely important and both btc and eth have failed miserably.
>Probably first mover advantage.
Were there digital currencies that tried (and failed) before bitcoin?
Was bitcoin in some way special?
What 'problem' did bitcoin solve that nothing else had done before it?
Here's another hint, anon: is proof-of-work important?

>I'm still not getting which one you are trying to hint at, there are so many chains and so little time.
Right again. Trust yourself, you have more power than you realize.

>>51329529

Filecoin.

>>51332037
>>51332386
>>51333419
notice how every investor in other chains wants people to know what to invest in?
If you really knew the winner with the best technology, wouldn't you want more time to accumulate?
I would...

>>51332442
>just a hint
here is a hint: you are talking to an xrp schizo

>>51333786
wrong.
you must have missed my comments on PoW.

>>51333358
Honestly, you’re just a little faggot who knows nothing about crypto.

>>51329529
everything except BTC ETH and XMR are projects and tokens not needed

>>51329529
Sigh, Oracles.

>>51333997
>not an xrp schizo
so you're just a retarded fag? that's exponentially more embarassing

>>51334103
What makes oracles necessary?

>>51332023
>>51332037
>>51332386
centralized garbage

I’m most bullish on Cosmos, but they don’t have like a unified token

>>51334407
Idk something along the lines of connection I guess

>>51335969
Connections between chains?
I guess sometimes I just wonder if multiple chains are necessary, that is if one chain could scale for everyone to use...but that would require a lot of scaling.

>>51334810
Centralization will win, anon. The masses aren’t smart enough to make BTC work. You know it to be true

>>51329529
Also polkadot

>>51336236
Well I’m thinking you can use other chains to help scale and leverage security assuming the Oracle is also decentralized. But thats just me.

>>51332023
fpbp

>>51329529
Cardano.

>>51333702
>If you really knew the winner with the best technology, wouldn't you want more time to accumulate?

yes. first accumulate then praise. thats why i cant say my favorite. still accumulating.

>>51336926
On the note of decentralized...
btc and eth are decentralized too...in the conventional sense.
But it still seems like the devs have a lot of power over what happens on those chains.

>>51337139

shinja is pretty cool. though they only have an nft collection for liquidity farming, a swap, and bridges with about every major chain out there. it's their future releases that have me hyped

DOT and Hedera fags need no apply by the way

>>51332567
fucking say the name already you absolute autismo ridden schizo fuck

>>51337330
>swap #942183812
>generic nft collection #92184384
>
sucks

>>51337330
>future releases
coming soon™ i'm sure

>>51337330
Feeling hype is bad anon. You should know this.

>>51337357
Less errors and annoyances than Pancakeswap so that's that at least kek
>>51337359
I know. It's moderate optimism more like.

>>51333997
who are you again?

>>51337348
I AM NOT GOING TO SAY IT
Hey basically I'm not gonna say it
I know...UGH I know...
I'm sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's just that I'm not gonna say it is all.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
(but I will keep making it more obvious if anons want to talk about it)

>>51337382
just your avg. autistic fren

>>51337457
is it icy

>>51337630
how big can icy scale right now?