/biz/ - Business & Finance

Literally everything is gaining on BTC. Please check the LINK/ETH pair instead.

>>51230682
Who the fuck look btclink instead of linkbtc

>not even 10% movement
>"gaining heavily"
yup, shills are fucking desperate

>>51230699
Why does it always need to be compared to ETH?

>>51230682
It means a correction is due and you're going to lose your tendies
My linkie is stinky

>>51230868
Fudders like it because it shown weakness
But then again its an erc20 token so evens out

>>51230868
>why does it need to be compared to the top performer?
midwit?

>>51230935
>ETH
>top performer
Don't look at the LUNC chart bro, don't do it.

>>51230935
LINK is up more than ETH today tho

>>51230959
>comparing a run of the mill shitcoin to ETH
don't forget DOGE and SHIB bro
>>51231006
is it "gaining heavily"?

>>51230959
No one's going to buy your bags

>>51231051
>you have to compare to the top performer
>nooooooo not THAT top performer!!

lmao cope

>>51231059
Never bought a lick of LUNC, not sure why you think I did.

>>51231051
Like 4%. Seems pretty good, no? Also OP said gaining heavily on BTC so I don't know what got you all riled up

>>51230705
>spending time in link threads
>trying to shut it down so that he can go back to spamming the board with 6+ fud threads an hour
you're so fucking bad at your "job," and so obvious at going about it that it's comical

>>51231084
nice cope yourself
>>51231099
EOS is outperforming both ETH and LINK
checkmate shill!
>OP said gaining heavily on BTC
factually wrong, and after getting BTFO you move the goalposts to muh ETH
>>51231107
undoubtedly you are even worse
quick, go make another thread for your 5% pump against ETH

>>51231124
You're moving goalposts like it's your calling in life lmao

>>51231142
sure pal whatever helps you sleep at night
meanwhile approximately 40 shitcoins are pumping harder against BTC and like 10 of them are outperforming ETH
keep harping on about nuanced bullshit

>>51231124
>n-no YOU'RE WORSE
wow it's truly over now - just sold 100k
how many hours of your life have you wasted desperate and seething over an allegedly irrelevant token you claim not to hold?

>>51231164
>meanwhile approximately 40 shitcoins are pumping harder against BTC
k
And?

>>51231178
thanks just bought 100k
>>51231184
why don't you make a couple threads for them?

>>51231124
>EOS is outperforming both ETH and LINK
>checkmate shill!
What? So is LUNC, I don't see the point. Nobody claimed LINK was the top performer today
>>OP said gaining heavily on BTC
>factually wrong, and after getting BTFO you move the goalposts to muh ETH
What the fuck are you on about? Look at the thread title. OP said LINK is gaining heavily on BTC, which it is. Someone pointed out >but muh ETH, but LINK is also gaining on ETH. So what got you so upset?

>>51231216
i don't care about whether you buy anything or not though
answer the question
how many hours of your life have you wasted desperate and seething over an allegedly irrelevant token you claim not to hold?

>>51231216
>why don't you make a couple threads for them?
I didn't make any thread lol
I just opened this thread and posted in it because I actually hold Link.
And you?

>>51231226
7% is not gaining heavily, it means absolutely nothing, especially when the entire market is pumping you absolute imbecile
wtf is the point of hyperfocusing on shitlink when it literally moves along with the entire market? anyway, cope harder
>>51231247
>>51231253
look at all these seething replies, do facts hurt your feelings? kek

>>51231274
>look at all these seething replies
t. highest post count of the thread

>>51231274
>n-no YOU'RE seething
nope, just amused at how easy it is to corner an esl cockroach so that all it can do is "no u" at me
here's the question again
how many hours of your life have you wasted desperate and seething over an allegedly irrelevant token you claim not to hold?

>>51231330
>how easy it is to corner
ooooh nooooooes I got cornered!1
>how many hours of your life
20 minutes
how many years have you wasted bagholding a dead shitcoin? 4 going for 5?

>>51231274
>7% is not gaining heavily,
7% in a single day is pretty good for non-meme coins. You're free to think otherwise.
>wtf is the point of hyperfocusing on shitlink when it literally moves along with the entire market?
I hold Chainlink, therefore I'm interested in the moves it makes. Especially as it seems stronger than most of the rest of the market (this has been a rarity the past 2 years). What is more interesting however, is why (You) would care if people focus on LINK during a pump?

>>51231352
>20 minutes
so to be realistic let's say 20 hours a week then, since that's an obvious lie
but what's the point?
you're so shit at what you do it would only make newfags curious and bullish on link
you understand that, right?

>>51230682
>What does this mean?
Major dump incoming.

>>51231364
>why (You) would care if people focus on LINK during a pump
since it isn't pumping on its own, and it is basically following the market, I really can't find a single reason to make this thread
if LINK was pumping against the market it would be valid
makes sense? no?

>>51231573
You could’ve just replied to OP with “all alts are pumping against BTC” or something, or better yet just ignored it.
But instead you had to go full seething fudder mode.

>>51231573
Link is the 6th biggest gainer in the past 24 hours, it's doing a bit more than just following the market.

>>51231661
it doesn't matter what points you make
these bulgarian pseudo-jannies are obsessed with link, and only want to police link discussions
i wonder if he's that retard that makes 50+ replies in the bigger discussion threads, not even aware of how increasingly absurd he looks spending time doing so

>>51231638
that's basically what I did, I dismissed the notion it was "gaining heavily"
you're basically saying
>you shouldn't have replied to all the seething bagholders attacking you
why did you bother replying to me? also you did not answer my question, what is the point of making this thread if the entire alt market is pumping? do you perhaps want to induce FOMO? cause that's what it looks like
>>51231661
oh okay, I guess we're gonna engage hair splitting now
>Link is the 6th biggest gainer in the past 24 hours
not on Binance at least, but I know, that doesn't matter
whatever

>>51230682
it's obvious that link will have a pre conference pump, the question is do we sell the news or not

BTCExclamation1000x

>>51231734
> I dismissed the notion it was "gaining heavily"
Right, you tried to argue semantics like a seething fudder would.

>>51231573
>and it is basically following the market
It's pumping harder than the general market.
>I really can't find a single reason to make this thread
See above. Also, do people really need reasons to make threads? It's a fucking anonymous imageboard
>makes sense? no?
No.
>>51231734
>whatever
Thanks for the admission of being wrong. Could've saved yourself 10 posts.

>>51231734
>I guess we're gonna engage hair splitting now
That's so rich coming from the guy who posted this >>51230705

Being 6th out of 100 isn't "following" by any definition. It's the opposite.

>>51231749

>>51231770
is that so? then you're doing the same rn, congrats
>>51231780
>It's pumping harder than the general market
it isn't
>do people really need reasons to make threads
thank you, that applies to me as well
I don't need a reason to enter this thread at all, just anonymous shitposting
>Being 6th out of 100 isn't "following
the market has literally 20,000 shitcoins, this is the definition of hair splitting
it's useless arguing with cultists, enjoy your exit pump I guess

>>51231820
You're wrong and you know it, enjoy coping and seething the rest of the day.

also thank me for pumping your shill thread

>>51231820
>it's useless arguing with cultists, enjoy your exit pump I guess
lmao yeah see you tomorrow when you make 10+ replies trying to fud and looking like a retard (again)
i'd suggest that you get help but you're clearly beyond that - just kys so that no one has to read your garbage ever again

>>51231820
How the fuck am I arguing semantics?

>>51231820
>>It's pumping harder than the general market
>it isn't
Anon, it's the 6th biggest gainer in the past 24h.

>>51231799
Ace of Spades was fucking tits

>>51230682
All the alts have been outperforming BTC since the last dump in June.
Of course, they also dumped harder. Except BNB, don't ask me why.

>>51230682
Means bigdogg was right.

>>51231864
great advice!

It means we’re in for a mega dump soon

>>51231749
If general consensus is to sell the news, don’t you think that whales would play the counterparty role? Typically conferences are a good way to network etc. but when it comes to tech usually you’d utilize a conference to show off the new shit you’ve built and that is ready for deployment. Let’s think logically here, Chainlink labs has been teasing for the past 8/9 months about finally introducing community participation. The ETH merge is scheduled to happen in the 2nd and 3rd week of this month. The v2 whitepaper states that DONs need to work in a dual use manner. Meaning they also need to be validators on the underlying chain that they service. Enjoy.

>>51235732
I’m calling bullshit on the “nodes need to run a validators” statement

>>51235815
Just go read the whitepaper. It’s a bit of reading but it’s clear.

>>51231440
This, anytime link pumps the entire market will die in the next 24 hours

welp, so much for the 6th biggest gainer...
many such cases

As always, once you see LINK/BTC going up, short the entire market.

>>51230682
Link, and every other altcoun but link in particular, has been shitting the bed against btc for so long it's just making it up now
I was really starting to wonder why I ever bought link instead of using that money to buy more Bitcoin

>>51230935
only the btc/link chart matters, you fucking moron

>>51235732
>>51236825
dual use manner incoming