/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51184106
I'm a XRP holder that constantly has to bitch slap retards in threads. I believe there is some sort of campaign with Ripple members shouting "$37,500!" all the fucking time. I honestly believe David Schwatz jewish goblin ass hops in the threads from time to time. The moment I slap the idiots back to reality with realistic prices of ~$67-300 it becomes undone next month when I return to this hell hole. I see link threads and in reality it is no different, just an air of depression and arrogance from almost making it.
>I know your lore. King David, Council of Nicea, etc.

It's quite simple.
XRP not sneeded, LINK sneeded very much so.

LINK is the standard isn't it

reminder that we, the link nation, have never stooped to such gauche behavior as setting arbitrary price targets or accumulation totals, nor have we repeated nonsensical slogans

>>51184479
I fell for the $1,000 meme, our version of xrp’s 37,500. Feels bad man. I dont think it’ll ever go back up. They hired the google guy and it went down. Something is broken

>>51184106
XRP threads copied the culture of link threads. That's why it feels fake. They even have this 2k eoy meme which blatantly copies the 1k eoy from link.

>>51184106
Lets just be honest for once, both linkies and schizos will make it in the end.

>>51184479
>realistic prices
>anything higher than $1

>>51184532
Do you have any proof to back that claim? I'm nearly certain our monkeys in our containment board came up with it first as the "pegged to gold" talk. On a side note, I do believe there are other coins we should be looking at besides XRP and Link. I feel as if these are all a distraction.

>>51184548
Im out of time unfortunately. I needed it to go right last year. And now w this macro, its hard to sleep

>>51184580
I'm going to assume you know nothing about XRP's lore. I'll humor you, though Linkards are so arrogant and not willing to disclose information easily. SWIFT moves 6.7 trillion daily, with XRP's 100 billion supply, doing simple math you can see it comes out to bare minimum $67. Though other factors could rise this, honestly though. I don't have hope for significantly higher numbers.

>>51184629
This stuff is what Im worried about w Link. All these intergrations and statistics on usage and yet the coin doesnt go up. And you ask 5 different people in crypto and get 5 different answers. One guy tells you x project is the future and the next guy is 100% certain its a complete scam. We are literally just betting on horses, with each horse having its own cult. And unironically my whole life depends on it. What a strange time to be alive

>>51184532
this.

>>51184695
If you study jewish culture, next years is the year to buy. 2026 is the years to sell. Anon, my advice to you is hold on tll that time and diversify. I believe these jews have tricks and it's best to know all projects they have their hand in.

>>51184629
I don't spoon feed anymore after doing it for two years and being relentlessly attacked by fud for fun faggots or niggers who are trying to clese their mental fog by baiting for spoon feeding.
Im sure I'm not the only one who's in this situation.
T: pre sibos baggie

XRP is LINK 2.0
Trust me, I’ve been here for long since bitcoin discussions were on /g/

>>51184775
Yes, but don't you think having multiple people aware of different lores could be beneficial? Attacking others and fudding seem to be tactics to create a sense of division and a sense of community "hur hur I hate these people." Meanwhile you don't get to see how their community is exactly like yours, almost as if they just want to shake dollars out of us. I say take the blinders off the horses and let them conspire against the system.

>>51184479
You really think xrp can go into low three digit prices?

>>51184106
>hodlers have tons of breadcrumb screenshots about all the uses and brand name integrations
Don’t you compare us to fucking linkcels. 99% of their partnerships are erc shitcoins worth 0 while XRP is in the news with central bank partnerships ready to run on ODL.

>>51184629
>I slap retards in threads
>XRP will assume SWIFT's full daily volume at zero discount, even though the whole draw of implementing new technology are the discounts
Self-flagellation is very chic.

>>51184587
ripple was laughed off the board in 2018 and only came back after Link found success as a schizo meme coin in mid 2020. after that, all of a sudden there were boomer bait XRP generals like the ones you know and love now.

>>51185814
Yeah Ill give you that. They think having a guy from DTCC show up to a conference guarantees trillions in value. Its pretty insane.

>>51184531
Yeah, it's called the market took a dump and you forgot to sell at 50+

>>51186217
Oh is that what “its called”?

>>51184776
ICP is XRP 2.0, we're already seeing the formation of a brand new cult of bagholders.

>>51184531
"""Our""" version of $37500 is $81000, not $1000.

>>51185814
>with central bank partnerships

Ah yes, the ever popular 'partnership' which is always just the devs paying some entity to say they're working with them (which will never actually go anywhere). How many partnerships have existed for crypto since 2017 and how many real-world uses of blockchain actually exist right now?

>>51184587
>our
I dont know who you are or what the fuck community we share. If you dont know this board's culture and you have a shitty memory then you are just some dumb goy who will forever be gaslighted and controlled.
Reminder that what got the main character in trouble in Nineteen Eighty Four was his memory. The rest of the human cattle couldnt accurately remember jack shit.

>>51184106
I don't think you could even compare it to XRP. Even XRP has some potential, however small, unlike LINK.

>>51184843
Cheers anon.

Token not needed.

Link
>Backbone of defi
>Token not needed
Xrp
>Backbone of failed bank deals
>Token not needed
Unless link does pic related I wouldn't say they're that similar

Well both are unironically being suppressed before the switch flip so yes.

>>51186392
At least link mooned, I didn't buy link at under 1$ because I thought it would never moon, even tho the anons shilled it so much, now I'm bagholding xrp cause I see it has the same moon potential link had in 2017/18

>>51186948
This whole fagotry of xrp schizos and link marines is retarded cause both tokens are gonna be used in the digital economy, each with their use case (imagine trying to do instant cross border tx using link, a erc20 token, as a settlement mechanism) except link already mooned and xrp did not.

>>51186588
Are you retarded? There’s at least 5 major central banks that have already announced to be onboard XRP use through ODL. Cope harder ERC cuck coiner ywnb ISO20022.

>>51187169
If you really believe that shit about xrp and link, then your position would be that neither of them have mooned, at least not compared to expected future price action.

>>51184592
I know what you mean bro, I was really hoping to make it this year with link. But now the way things have gone I'm starting to think I'm just gonna be some old faggot with money and not enough life left to enjoy it. I'm 31 and starting to lose my hair so it's already mostly over for me already.

>>51187169
That's my point, link actually went up. If you're in crypto with less than mid six figs and number go up isn't your priority you're either too isolated from financial concerns or just never going to make it. Maybe when I'm at $5m I can start having schizo "for the tech" bags

>>51184775
Funny. I was exactly the same, particularly through 2021 when you just could not get a single positive wave of momentum through LINK threads. The reason I stopped though was because the PA was so awful I actually felt guilty for anyone I roped into this mess. I don't know when or how it turns around but I actually don't think we see $50 again until next blowoff top earliest. That's how much of a 180 my sentiment has done. I feel crazy after these past 2 years. Have totally reevaluated my whole perspective on LINK as an investment vehicle.

XRP will go to $37500

>>51186607
And neither can you.

>>51186948
Unironically XRP is the only actually needed token.
Well ICP and CXO too but no one cares for real.

>>51190594
> the only actually needed

You sound dumb.

>>51184106
Comparing Linkies to Cripplets is fud that is literally many years old.
It's brought up every single day.

My biggest problem with Link fud in general isn't necessarily how bad it is, it's more about it being soul-crushingly repetitive, shallow, and all in all BORING.

>>51190613

If you dont know about XRP by now you never will

Why the fuck do you think Americans are barred from buying any?

Yes, dont buy XRP! Its a scam! Its so much of a scam we are taking it off exchanges for Americans to buy it!!!

Retard

>>51190652
>dont buy XRP! Its a scam!
Well the people behind XRP were certainly scammy as fuck.
Any time a project tells buyers they'll make the price go up, it's a massive red flag. And Ripple did this constantly.

>>51190667
yeah better trust the fat russian

>>51190636
Why would it change though? The FUD has been proven relevant for 2 years running. Anyone who was "bearish" or not sufficiently bullish on LINK for 2 years have the returns to show for it. That's why it sticks around, because it's all typically based in reality: core featured undelivered, underperforming, opaque market dumping, now more recently the Celsius and SmartCon ticket prices FUD, etc... All true, reasonable. Sad but meh. Chainlink team does itself no favours at all. Anyone whose ego or faith in LINK has not been JUSTed by the past 2 years is totally blinded by bias, that's a matter of undisputable fact.

>>51190697
/thread
>le fud le fud le fud
fud will cease to have any effect the moment this atrocious price action is reversed, until then, I cannot understand why the fuck you people constantly complain about "fud", just stop entering these retarded threads ffs

>>51190697
>Why would it change though?
Because it's mind-meltingly boring.

>>51184106
Link pumped from cents to like $50.

>>51190741
like the token's price you mean?

>>51190761
>p-pls keep talking to me
No, it's boring.

>>51190787
it's much more entertaining than the non stop delusional hype posting and hopium over absolutely nothing, it almost feels cathartic
>inb4 boooring talk to me about $1000 eoy

>>51190801
>p-pls keep talking to me

>>51190809
so this is what you resort to? shitposting and derailing?
so sad...

>>51190761
>Link price action is boring
>better add more boredom

>>51190741
You obviously have wilfully missed the explicit point made as you don't have a meaningful reply to it. The so-called FUD is closer to reality than your subjective apologist excuses and speculations. If anything should be changing, it's prospects for LINK, that's the part that's so funny to me about people like you who think FUD is some kind of concoction. It's borne out in plain reality.

In the past at least it was made up. Jaso Parser, nail salon, backpacking in SEA, "no one will pay $1k for an oracle call", etc. Now it's just honest observations of the state of affairs, and that state is undelivered promises, feature creep, weird fucking behaviours like the SmartCon prices or Big Mac competition, I mean it's just comical at this stage to suggest the "FUD" is contrived.

>>51190848
yes, usually this is how it goes
price dictates the sentiment

>>51190871
Except the fud was just as bad when Link was booming.
The Google Cloud fud is still going around for instance.

>>51190865
>writing all that in-depth analysis shit about "hurr Linkies are the new xrp schizos"; the stalest fud imaginable
Be more interesting.

>>51190907
Again, the smugness went out the window a while ago, has been for 2 years. You have been running victory laps about the performance LINK put in during 2018-20, years later. It's not about FUD changing or whatever else. It's about your investment, LINK PA = categorically appalling.

>>51190887
I don't remember anyone complaining about "fud" since LINK was outperforming the market regardless
not to mention that most of the so called "fud" was created from marines to keep out r*ddit etc
I mean, you're the one complaining about "soul-crushing" fud right now, I'm only suggesting that the "fud" and the overall negativity is a byproduct of price action and lack of a working product
tl;dr cope
>>51190907
>an emotional meaningless retort
why do you think (You) warrant an interesting response?

>>51190940
>You have been running victory laps about the performance LINK put in during 2018-20, years later
xrp shills correspondingly are gloating over past performance during 2016-17 to this day lmao

>>51190945
> I don't remember anyone complaining about "fud"
Lmao newfag

The Google Cloud thing unleashed a tidal wave of fud that was already tesious beyond human comprehension by the time Zeus capital released their anthology of tedious Link fud in spring of 2020.
And this was all when Link was still on a 2-year beat-the-market winning streak.

Fuck outta here

>>51190945
>I'm only suggesting that the "fud" and the overall negativity is a byproduct of price action
That's the other funny part for me, the anons who keep up this stupid act that you'd have to have ulterior motives to be negative about LINK... how separate from reality can an opinion before you take stock of your convictions? We all look at the same charts. We're all on the same timeline here. So-called "FUD" has been sustainably proven warranted.

The only viable reply offered is the stance people like Sergey, CLG, other so-called community leaders take: "we don't discuss price". For the team, okay, legal reasons, but for PR sidekicks like CLG or the other Twitter tools, and other clowns like "Spoonfeedy", this is just convenient fine print. Everyone cares about price. Again, simply a comical hiding place.

>>51190981
>tedious Link fud in spring of 2020
nobody gave a shit, LINK kept pumping regardless until August of 2020, your point is moot
even after that the overall sentiment of this board was extremely positive up until this year
>inb4 muh fud threads were always here!1!1!
we're talking about the EFFECT fud has over (You), and once again I'm telling you nobody gave a shit up until recently

>>51190991
>Everyone cares about price
it comes down to this, completely agree
>inb4 in for teh tech!11!

>>51190981
We always had the convenience then of pointing to price. Similar to Zeus Capital. The ultimate demolition of that suppositional kind of FUD was price action doing it all for you. Case closed. Now, the shoe is really on the other foot and bulls no longer have that advantage. Furthermore, FUD is no longer suppositional, or preying on ignorance of fundamentals as I pointed out earlier
it is based on common objective and uncomfortable facts, e.g. no core features, sustained poor PA, Celsius shilling, etc. Stripping away any potential disagreements about future performance, that aspect is not up for argument. LINK dominance fell from #5 to #26 or so in 2 years. LINK is no longer a cherub. It's a different situation.

>>51191072
elegantly put, screencapped for posterity

XRP will be the bridge between tradfi and defi. Its guaranteed to become the number one crypto that accounts for at least 50% of the marketcap of the entirety of crypto that all other cryptos follow. All other cryptos will be fighting for a fraction of XRP's Mcap since XRP is the gateway crypto and it's be impossible to have more value than XRP as that value can't exist

>>51184532
>thread title says LINK is XRP 2.0
>this dumb anon says XSG copied LINK
You are a woman.

>>51190996
>>51191072
This discussion was about the tedium of the Link fud. It was always overwhelmingly tedious, regardless of how well or poorly the token price was doing.

Lord knows what the fuck you faggots are even trying to argue at this point. I'll just chalk it up to goalpost moving.

>>51191664
>I was talking about x
>I still don't know what you're arguing for, lololol goalpost moving
the only person moving the goalposts itt is (You)
do better

>>51191735
The argument was about Link fud being boring.

>>51191743
like the token's price, yes

>>51191748
But the fud was just as boring when the token price wasn't boring at all.

>>51191664
The point is how biased you are in characterising the FUD "tedious" as opposed to literally playing out before your very own eyes for two years running to your wilful ignorance. You are trying to come off as though you're in a position of strength to this whacky, irrelevant negative sentiment when that negative sentiment has proven totally reasonable while you're apparently off in some alternate reality where LINK has been defying it. News flash...

>>51191766
but then it didn't bother anybody as much as it does now
congrats, we just half the thread

>>51191774
recapped* half the thread

>>51184106
thats why I dca into xrp, link and now icp
gotta help my brothas out wif heavy bags

>>51191769
>how biased you are in characterising the FUD "tedious"
Anon, the OP of this thread is literally "hurr Linkers are the new XRP schizos".

If this were some hard-hitting new insight, then god yes I'm all for it. But it's not. It's the laziest, most derivative, most stale fud imaginable.

I buyed LINK instead of cripple in 2018, partially thanks to this now 4+ year old image lol

>>51191796
then why don't you ignore it?

>>51191774
So you agree that the fud is tedious, the only difference is its impact. Thanks you just wasted a bunch of time and effort.

>>51191811
Kinda hard to ignore when it's everywhere all the time, every single hour, day, week, month, year, ...

>>51191813
no, I think the fud persists because it is being reinforced by reality, you dismiss the fud completely
>>51191827
there's a thing called "filters", use it
>but then every LINK thread is filtered and I can't see them hurr
make your own "positive" thread
problem solved

>>51191842
>I think the fud persists because it is being reinforced by reality
It persisted for years even though Link spent all that time beating the market.

>>51191796
My point is it's playing out, anon. It is relevant. You consider it tedious because you, evidently, don't want to hear it, but whether you like it or not it is playing out, it's a natural conclusion, so it gets airtime.

>>51191878
>it's playing out
Linkers are the new XRP schizos is playing out?

>>51191862
but it wasn't affecting anybody as much as it does now
>"soul-crushing"
hence why you keep replying to me, arguing in circles
your problem is not the constant fud, it is the actual state of LINK, sooner you realize this the better

>>51191891
exactly, the similarity is uncanny

>>51184106
Link threads are full of FUD you lying faggot literally the entire reason you made this thread.

>>51191914
half the thread is anons defending LINK you retard

>>51191899
You said you think the fud persists because it's being reinforced by reality.
That's wrong because the fud persisted just as badly when it was being contradicted by reality.

>>51191933
the fud back then was bullshit, the fud right now is factual
last reply to you, you're either purposefully trolling me, or you're an actual moron that can't get grasp the underlying argument no matter how clearly stated it is

>>51191950
You said you think the fud persists because it's being reinforced by reality.
That's wrong because the fud persisted just as badly when it was being contradicted by reality.

>>51191842
>there's a thing called "filters", use it

In other words: "if you like Link, then filter Link threads because they're all fud" lmao
Seems about right.

>>51191966
>You said you think the fud persists because it's being reinforced by reality.
yes you dense moron, do you see any of this shit
>2 man dev team 1 philosophy major
>json parser
>shadowfork
>Sergey snorting lines and buying hookers in SF
getting spammed everywhere as it used to? shut the fuck up

I bought Link because the obvious psy-op to make people not buy it in here was a clear indicator it was the one. I'd be lying if I said that was the only reason, but the fud campaign against Link for me really is a big influence in my choice. No one really hates on XRP. They just honestly think it's shit and won't achieve anything

>>51191975
yes, filter them all and then sort them out instead of entering each and every new thread just to argue with le fudders
literal imbecile

>>51191976
The same exact fud from years ago is still being spammed day and night, yes.
>token not needed
>fake partnerships
>they'll just make their own oracles
>linkers are the new xrp schizos
etc. etc.

>>51191926
t. a fudder who happens to have the highest post count itt

>>51191995
>token not needed
true until staking
>fake partnerships
more like "meaningless" partnerships, yeah
out of the 1000 crypto shitcoins LINK has integrated with, only 30-40 of them are not actual vaporware
>they'll just make their own oracles
I haven't seen much of "shadowfork" fud these days, all I see is "down against ETH", "oh fuck we're getting another beta feature", "oh shit the dumps have resumed", "smartcon 2 will probably be a nothinburger" etc
>linkers are the new xrp schizos
indeed
>>51192022
>implying you're not a samefag swapping ids ever since you got called out for your constant 90pbtid bullshit

>>51191950
> last reply to you
Whoops!

>>51192049
>forgetting to swap id
ooopsie

>>51192059
What?

>>51192038
>>token not needed
>true until staking
Tell that to T-Systems.

>>51192099
I just told them and they agree

>>51192038
You're just proving my point fucking lmao
Face it, your fud is tedious beyond belief.

People automatically tune out when they see it, it has zero effect anymore.
It didn't change a thing about the token price when it was booming, and it doesn't change a thing about the token price now it's in the gutter.

>>51192122
>zero effect
>I'll keep replying to you without refuting it btw

>>51192127
Here's the proof: when Zeus Capital created an anthology of years worth of /biz/ fud and distributed it to the masses, Link promptly pumped to rank 5.
The fud doesn't do anything, it never did.

All it does is give you your dopamine fix since you're a degenerate loner and talking to anonymous strangers is the closest thing to human companionship you have.

>>51190748
Hello newfag

>>51192166
then stop complaining about it, allow other people to have a negative view on your investment
it's not like you can even refute anything anymore, it comes down to hope and trust on the team finally delivering
have fun

>>51192099
Checked. T-Systems is also a dot validator. And picrel seems to depict a stink parachain in the future? Is stink becoming a parachain on dot?

>>51192190
>then stop complaining about it
It's tedious, you're shitting the board.

>>51191899
>your problem is not the constant fud, it is the actual state of LINK, sooner you realize this the better
Well summarised.

>>51192237
in my view you're the one who constantly shits up the board
like I said, this won't get us anywhere, your posts won't convince anyone dissatisfied with LINK so far to stop shitposting, the only thing that will reverse the sentiment is staking getting shipped or/and price recovering
you can either choose to ignore the fud, or you can keep engaging and adding fuel to the fire

>>51192266
Buddy, my problem is the massive tedium of the fud, not the fud itself.

>>51192273
>this won't get us anywhere
EXACTLY
So stop posting the same boring shit over and over and over and over
Back when people kept posting "it's happening tonight" I was among the first to ask them to stop. And that was a tiny fraction of a percent as rote as the fucking fud.

It seems you dweebs have finally reached the “doubt” part of fud. Finally believing that your investment may not have been the best decision. The only project in crypto that doesn’t have a competitor, and that underpins it’s entire real world usage and a step function increase in human productivity from a team that works in silence and doesn’t release a product until all security vulnerabilities have been covered, and that have a team of expert researchers that has grown from a 2 man team to well over 300. At this point, link has officially bottomed out, thanks for the general sentiment.

>>51192301
as long as you keep posting your deluded ramblings here and keep @ me, I'll keep responding and there's nothing you can do about it
seethe harder

>>51192304
>fud is bullish, bottom is in
if I had a penny for every time this got posted, I would have made it already

>>51192312
> seethe harder
t. 29 pbtid fudder who promised to stop posting 10 posts ago

>>51192347
I lied it seems
does that upset you?

>>51192319
Kek, you’re right. Just sold the remaining link I have and I’ll go buy some LUNC, maybe avax or matic since those projects are finished and consider themselves perfect. Maybe some dot, or uniswap. I recently like ethPOW a lot. You know, since it’s still POW and miners definitely help improve development.

>>51192301
>Buddy, my problem is the massive tedium of the fud, not the fud itself.
That's just such a nonsense hair-splitting statement.

FUD is mooted by positive PA, in the same way the opposite was validated in 2018-2020. You might call it "tedium" or "relevance" or anything else. The point is, if your starting point was closer to Zeus Capital's than to a LINK bull's for the back half of LINK's lifetime, you're richer for it. You would be "right" by the rules of this game we're all playing, whether you admit it or not.

I qualify this again by saying all this is independent of LINK's prospects. The point here is just to say this bullshit about how "tired" FUD is or these outmoded dismissive reactions, which would work only if we were still in 2019, are ego-driven exercises. Contrived smugness just reveals a divorce from reality by now. Harsh but true.

Consider this: Y/N, if staking had been released a year or two ago, would LINK be trading at $6 today? I have to imagine you think it would be far higher. I would agree. If so, is it therefore so-called "FUD" to say that the team has failed to deliver core features and that this has hurt ROI? Seems important. Seems like the central narrative, unfortunately for you, an entirely natural, thematic observation. I'd say it is in fact validated by the terms of your own bullish expectations for staking alone having not arisen. The FUD is a natural byproduct, much the same manner bullish sentiment persisted early on (beyond the obvious made-up hipster gatekeeping fake FUD of 2018). A mature perspective is that this is all just part of the duality of the market, expectations arising and correcting, narratives taking hold. You just don't want to think in this direction because you are deeply biased. Ironic for a team priding itself on its focus on product development to be as dawdling as every other team on core releases.

>>51192386
kek the hubris

>>51192417
>FUD is mooted by positive PA
The tedium of fud isn't mooted by anything, peabrain.
Neither is the price impact of fud btw, since there never was any.

>>51192443
I don't think you have any point and I think you know it.

>>51192443
>completely avoiding the issue
>repeating the same irrelevant statements
bot

>>51192459
The point is the fud is tedious.

>>51192482
beep boop

>>51192418
Rather, I know what I’ve bought. And your attempts at demoralization don’t work. And to me, this is free money at this point. Thank god, technical jargon doesn’t bother me when I can look up a term or phrase I don’t know when reading papers. Anyways, it’s been 5 years closing in on 6. And what the said in the first, came true and so far what they’ve said in the second seems like it’s going to happen. Not gonna tell you what that is though, I like seeing the fud olympics.

>>51192482
Okay, and what would you like to hear? "Aw, sorry to hear that, sweetheart"? This so-called tedious FUD, e.g. "staking isn't out yet, LINK turning into the next XRP" or any substitute, would of course not be in the biz lexicon had that reality not rung true of late. It's all a product of objective reality, despite your misguided frustrations towards natural, thematic observations about that reality that are bound to arise. Can't be put clearer. You're just acting silly.

>>51192541
You like to say absolutely nothing in a lot of words.
The fud is tedious, it's robotic rote. That is all.

>>51192528
>industry standard
>god protocol
>I know what I’ve bought
>free money
you know what the problem is? I've seen this exact post being posted here word for word so many times I've become immune to it.
>And what the said in the first, came true and so far what they’ve said in the second seems like it’s going to happen
I don't know if you are aware of this, but Chainlink is still missing features promised in the first whitepaper, as well as DECO, Town Crier, Mixicles etc
the only thing they have delivered so far is mainnet, price feeds, vrf, and a limited usage of keepers.
sorry, but your attempts at "remoralization" won't work on me
release the fucking thing already
>>51192556
>You like to say absolutely nothing in a lot of words.
you enjoy doing the same but in a lot of posts instead.

>>51184695
>it all feels arbitrary
hm, almost as if maybe it is and all these people are lying to you to make a quicj buck on the ponzi scheme before moving on because they were always richer than you

>>51192556
That's because you're being purposely dense and evasive. That is just an extremely minor nonsensical point to spend an entire thread vehemently defending, so you sort of betray your own true feelings here. It may be tedious to you, but it's absolutely valid and to be expected because it rings true, so point is you should get used to it until your bull thesis plays out. No one really cares about your personal feelings towards anything meanwhile.

XRP IS BACKED BY GOLD LINK IS BACKED BY BIG MAC SAUCE

>>51192640
>you're being purposely dense and evasive
No, I'm just saying the fud is rote, tedious, derivative, boring, ...
It's been like this for many years.

>>51192670
And has been proven entirely relevant...

>>51192701
How?

>>51192418
The irony of someone complaining others don’t have a crystal ball, then subsequently accusing them of hubris. You should stop discussing link and just sell, free yourself, you’re correct, the token isn’t needed, just forget about crypto for a few years, it will improve your quality of life, fren.

>>51192670
that's because LINK as of now is rote, tedious, derivative, boring you retard
Rory being a cuck wasn't boring, it was hilarious
>>51192708
rote (same fucking slides, same fucking shirt for 5 years)
tedious (need I say more)
derivative (it entirely depends on the rest of the crypto scamcoin casino's success as a whole)
boring (it does fuck all for half of it's lifespan)
>>51192716
I'll do whatever pleases me, thank you very much
you're free to ignore me, filter my id etc

>>51192612
Kek. You’re right. Why don’t they just release products without testing. It’s not like crypto fails if Chainlink has an exploit, I like being able to just buy tokens and BTC. I don’t really care much to “remoralize” you or anyone else. All information has been provided and is easy to access. From the data, to the research. Just call it a day and sell. But you’ve got to come up with good fud. Preferably one that takes us back to fear instead of doubt. I want these fuckers to shake in their boots.

>>51192745
>that's because LINK as of now is rote, tedious, derivative, boring
Then why was the Link fud rote, tedious, derivative, boring back when Link had some of the most exciting price action in all of crypto for two years straight?

>>51192745
No I think you should sell your link, I’m looking out for your best interest baggie.

>>51192757
>just wait for 10 more years until they audit their shit bruh, future of finance 4ir god protocol token bro
>it was a 15 year hold from the start anyway
>>51192761
>Then why was the Link fud
it wasn't, honestly some of it was the most hilarious shit ever
you're clearly a 2020 tourist
>>51192768
gotchu senpai

>>51192786
>it wasn't
Except of course it was.
Just read the Zeus Capital report; it's a literal anthology of years of extremely tedious Link fud that came out during the two years that Link spent beating the markt.

>>51192817
zeus report mentioned sirgay backpacking in eastern asia after burning through the $30 million from ICO?
holy shit

>>51192786
>bro just release the product
>please just release it
> I can’t continue to fud
>please bro just release it my own fud is getting to me
>please bro please just release it don’t test just release let me laugh at all the people who sold
>please bro I spent 6 years in threads convincing people to sell just release the products

>>51192841
>bro trust me, keep on hodling 4ever

>>51184106
No shit genius. Every single general on /biz/ is a bagholder thread except for boomer rocks which are yet to bloom (maybe)

>>51192840
There's some fuddy fud these days too. I'm talking about the shit fud that's been getting carpetbombed on here for many years, like the fud in OP.

>>51192786
Mate just sell, why be a baggie. It’s embarrassing. The team is dumping millions of tokens on your head, maybe if they had clarified this in the original whitepaper or something you could explain it, but these dumps are literally coming out of nowhere, likely because chainlink labs ran out of funding and are exit scamming. In fact I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re a paid shill yourself, instructed to “le fud 4 fun” to trick folks into buying those heavy bags, extremely immoral behavior.

>>51192879
:)

>>51192872
you unironically don't even have a fucking point anymore, you just want to have the last word lmao

>>51184510
Always was

>>51192890
The point is the fud (like in OP) is extremely tedious, and always was.
Even back when Link was beating the entire market for two years straight, the fud was tedious, repetitive, boring, ... so the recent price action has nothing to do with it.

>>51192912
the point is you're probably a bot

>>51192851
>please bro just sell.
>don’t read anything, don’t buy anything else just sell your link and definitely dont buy link
>please bro just sell before they release anything
>bro please just trust me I definitely care about your finances
>please bro just listen to me talk and fud a project for 6 years

>>51192922
>dr;ns

>>51192918
It takes a bot to keep carpetbombing the same stale old fud every single day for years.

>>51192942
beep boop
>>51191933
>>51191966
I think something's off, you might wanna update your script

>>51192927
>bro I’ve been telling u to sell for 6 years now. You never made money
>new dog token just dropped partnered with Chainlink
>buy the dog token don’t buy link it’s better

>>51184629
>thinking transaction volume = market cap
retarded. But dont let me stop you I like watching idiots get rekt.

>>51192996
>black and white
why do you resort in such cheap tactics? where did I imply you should dump your LINK for a dogshit scam?
btw you're obviously seething so I would suggest going outside for a while, take some deep breaths and then come back

>>51193037
>I would suggest going outside for a while, take some deep breaths and then come back
t. 44 pbtid

>>51193051
oh there you are :)

>>51193037
>bro sell ur link it’s best you do that
>come on bro just trust me I have no financial incentive to get you to sell
What tactics? I don’t give a fuck about what someone else does with their money, go buy link or go sell who cares. You’re pushing 50 posts atm, you sure you’re not the one that needs to go outside?

>>51193037
I’ll engage you in good faith for a moment but I’m curious, you seem to be of the opinion that it’s worthwhile to discuss legitimate fud, not the silly stuff from prior years. But you’ve also suggested the token dumps are a new and legitimate fud that need to be addressed, despite being outlined in the original whitepaper 5 years ago. So which is it, are you just a seething demoralized holder intent on making sure no newfag catches on enough to buy a potential bottom? Or a genuinely concerned investor who never even bothered to do basic research on their own investment?

>>51184510
It showed that it's viable to take money from investors without giving them anything in return. It's weird that this works, you only need buzzwords and powerpoint slides. Usually VCs want to see results, but here? Hire 20 HR people, run conventions, who cares, right?

>>51193208
The irony being that if this was links goal, they failed colossally compared to memecoins that spent a fraction and garnered vastly more interest from retail.

>>51193187
Why can’t he be both? A lot of them reguritate the same points.

>>51193184
yeah I'm sure thanks for you concern
>I don't give a fuck
I've been giving you two word responses and you seemed to be going off but I might have misunderstood kek
>the token dumps are a new and legitimate fud that need to be addressed, despite being outlined in the original whitepaper 5 years ago
as long as features are not getting shipped, dumping tokens is bearish
the moment they start shipping things, I'll probably change my mind
>b-b-but it was outlined
I really don't care, and I don't think why you should as well, they have outlined numerous things that haven't materialized yet

>>51190865
>pic
Can't blame the Egyptians, donkeys are much better animals for a contact zoo.

>>51193258
I suppose he could be. My brain just auto filters people when I see certain points brought up and token dumps is one of them, but he’s so insistent on other points like DECO or mixicles not being released that I assumed he was at least attempting to fud in good faith. But anyone who genuinely uses token dumps as a legitimate point of fud, logically never would have bought link in the first place. That would be like complaining about the cheese in your quesadilla.

>>51193276
>two word responses
>proceeds to type out a bunch of shit
It’s okay to admit you’re demoralized anon and it’s also okay to sell and not think about a speculative asset in a speculative economy. You’d be better off just going to the casino and playing blackjack.

>>51193314
>But anyone who genuinely uses token dumps as a legitimate point of fud, logically never would have bought link in the first place
you seriously do not understand how a sentiment can change in a span of 5 years?
>>51193334
it is also okay for you to ignore my posts anon, cause for some reason they seem to be triggering you

>>51193250
You'd have to look at the total value extracted by the devs / company to make that comparison. Are there any figures of how much Chainlink Labs has sold at what price over the years?

XRP is bought by people with extremely low IQs and people with extremely high IQs. LINK is bought by midwits with above average IQ

>>51193371
>Are there any figures of how much Chainlink Labs has sold at what price
hard hitting question anon, prepare to get berated

>>51193276
You’re complaining about things not being released when you probably haven’t the first clue what that process entails, likely everything you’re pointing to is things you were spoonfed on here. Now your brain is attempting to make logical sense of the poor price action but working entirely from the premise that something within the project itself went terribly wrong, ignoring all outside factors, including the attempt to usurp legacy infrastructure, existing in the most irrational and scammy market in history, any potential parties that benefit from price suppression to accumulate before staking, along with the macro environment. Note any one of those things can have a tremendous impact, but you seem convinced the explanation can only come from within, likely because you’re emotionally tied to your investment, maybe you spent money you couldn’t afford to lose, or made plans that have fallen apart.

Reminder that if any anon has something valuable to say it can always be done in 5 posts or less.

>>51193443
>completely avoids giving a proper response
>proceeds to post a patronizing, insulting, arrogant, belittling, long winded response which attempts to dismiss the atrocious price action as some sort of "natural progress" and essentially boils down to "trust the team"
cool man

>>51193371
No you wouldn’t, napkin math would tell you that memecoins spent less than link and achieved a higher marketcap. Ethereum also grossly outperformed it over the past 2 years. Again if the goal was to milk retail investors, then chainlink is a colossal failure compared to a litany of other crypto projects.

>>51193314
You give them too much credit. Just morons that repeat what they see in an anonymous image board.
>>51193353
Haven’t ignored anything, it’s just that nothing you say has substance. It’s not personal. It’s just that while I know I know nothing, you don’t.

>>51193469
>nah transparency of Chainlink's finances is irrelevant, look at le memecoins le ETH!1!
>>51193486
alright man, even more of a reason to ignore me

>>51193495
Cmon anon. I’m having fun here. Being your own boss has benefits. I get to shitpost and go back and forth with retards about why they should sell their assets. Every (you) I get gives me dopamine, and I’m sure you’re the same otherwise you would have ignored me.

>>51193527
>Being your own boss
LMAO ok boss anon
kek

>>51193536
>Another (you)
>more than two words
I must respond. I bet you ask for cheese on the side of your Big Mac. Fatty.

>>51192965
HOLY SHIT AHAHAHAHAH fucking bot exposed

HODL MARINES TWO MORE WEEKS!!!!!

>>51193495
I didn’t say that, the argument is chainlink is some elaborate next level ponzi scheme with a revenue model dependent on retail. How can you agree with that with a straight face when crypto has proven you can make more money with a ponzi with a thousandth of the effort or investment? It makes absolutely no logical sense, just emotional lashing out because you are angry the market doesn’t see what you do, except instead of claiming the market might be wrong, you’re turning on your investment, but holding it to irrational standards. The simpler explanation is legacy finance isn’t fully onboard with crypto yet, and those who control these completely unregulated markets stand to make far more money pumping and dumping scams than waiting for adoption, so they will continue to do so until the 9th hour because they can afford to, while you have to wait around with your 5,6, maybe 7 figures because you can’t afford that level of risk without some type of insider knowledge.

>>51193628
>why don't they rugpull and potentially face legal retributions instead of playing the long game a la XRP, and getting insanely rich in the process?
did that answer your inquiry anon? this is my view, and while I'm not convinced this is the absolute truth, I'm willing to admit it is a possibility at this point
I really don't think you can change my mind on this, I told you, if they ever start shipping shit, I'll rethink about it

>>51193673
Did I hit a little too close to home fat boy? Just go sell. Your investment will never take off. No one cares enough to change your mind. Go sell, u fatty. And do it right this time, buy high and sell low. The /biz/ way.

>>51193736
156 pounds, I'm a skinny bitch :(

>>51193759
Spent all your money on link and now your emaciated? Or are you just a manlet? Either way sell your link and get some food u skinny fuck or sell your link and get limb lengthening surgery. Those would be better than gambling on a speculative investment. You skinny fat manlet.

I have like 150k xrp and will sell after the lawsuit. I laugh at these 2 digit price predictions.

>>51193673
Not really because then you could apply that same reasoning to any investment in history that did not immediately take off within the first few years. You’re also ignoring that unlike the rest of the market, link saw most of its growth asymmetrical to the traditional crypto market cycle, so while other projects are treading water at 2017 ath’s (and many, like xrp, well below), link is currently 6x from there. Which suggests that while it’s still subject to the same volatility as the rest of the asset class, it’s seeing more organic and measured growth. This board understood that buying link was always a leveraged bet against the current state of crypto, and it lost that big time for the last couple of years. It’s fair to reassess, but you also have to ask yourself if you aren’t holding link to impossible standards. Maybe it isn’t them not trying to to lift this market out of the darkness, maybe it’s the market rejecting the idea of growing up. Either way staying in link is a losing play the longer this goes on, but the alternatives are try to swim with the whales and potentially get devoured one day as nothing is based on fundamentals, or abandon crypto altogether.

>>51194083
>link saw most of its growth asymmetrical to the traditional crypto market cycle
what you fail to realize is that plenty of shitcoins have done something similar during these past 10 years in this market, they all have shed a brief light and then faded to obscurity
>it’s seeing more organic and measured growth
and that's literally confirmation bias, how the fuck do you even define "organic growth" in a market that hasn't experienced ANYTHING organic so far?
>link was always a leveraged bet
then act like it's a fucking bet and don't get so offended when other people criticize your bet for whatever reason
>against the current state of crypto
the current state of crypto is still a shitcoin casino, the bet so far isn't looking that good
>but the alternatives are
to stop focusing exclusively on LINK, and finding the next best thing
simple as that

>>51194169
>don't get so offended
t. 54 pbtid

>>51184106
theres no doubt they are the same schizos now

>>51184764
>If you study jewish culture, next years is the year to buy
just reading this sentence made me realize how many mentally ill people there are really here

>>51194169
You hold a lot of chainlink. Don't respond to me I won't read it.

>>51194338
How new are you?

>>51194366
He probably does as does everyone who responds to long boring threads such as this, lets face it, whether anons will admit it or not, link is one of the first cryptos where a lot of retail got in at the actual bottom, so there are people who never held serious money in their lives sitting on 5, 6 or even 7 figure net worths right now, and feeling the heat after that figure dropped by 90% in the past year. Most missed bitcoin and eth early, this is unironically different as many here have actual skin in the game.
>>51194169
>what you fail to realize is that plenty of shitcoins have done something similar during these past 10 years in this market, they all have shed a brief light and then faded to obscurity
Show me the shitcoins that saw exponential growth outside of a bitcoin bull market, then managed to hold those gains after a bear market. Surely there's a bunch of 2019 coins that exploded and are still sitting above their 2019 highs, yes? The reality is the ones that do explode outside of a traditional bitcoin market cycle are scams that disappear into obscurity (anyone remember Statera?), or they're directly tied to link itself and couldn't exist without chainlink (ie aave, yearn). But if you can show me another project that saw exponential growth outside of a general crypto bull market, and maintained that growth into the next bear, I'll concede the point.
>and that's literally confirmation bias, how the fuck do you even define "organic growth" in a market that hasn't experienced ANYTHING organic so far?
Growth that exists outside of traditional crypto market cycles, ie bitcoin hype/mania. Otherwise chainlink should have retraced all of its gains including from 2020/2019, and that hasn't happened yet. Its also not shilled to retail at all outside of here, but this is a hurtbox not a hugbox (evidenced by the fact that you can spam 50+ posts in a thread and nobody can silence you even if almost all disagree).

>>51194169
>then act like it's a fucking bet and don't get so offended when other people criticize your bet for whatever reason
I am and have been, I'm just having a discussion. Meanwhile maybe consider your own advice, as you seem extremely offended at any notion that there is a long term vision with link and you may just have to outlast the irrationality of the market in order to capitalize on that bet.
>the current state of crypto is still a shitcoin casino, the bet so far isn't looking that good
Absolutely, that's why this slide is the one I've always felt most accurately represented the turning point, and why it could be a while longer. The question is all about risk:reward, and each anon has to asses that for themselves. You appear to be leaning towards link's risk outweighing its reward, but without any conviction, praying some anon smarter than yourself can put the nail in the coffin and convince you to finally let go. That, or you are playing the long (fud) con, seething at the idea that some zoomer who lucked out on dogcoins will pick up a bigger link stack than even you were able to accumulate years ago. Which I don't necessarily fault you for, the idea sickens a lot of anons I'm sure, but its no different than early btc buyers seething at people who got in eth or link early and outdid btc's gains the past few years.
>to stop focusing exclusively on LINK, and finding the next best thing
simple as that
You don't actually believe that or you wouldn't waste your time in link threads like this. You know as well as the rest of this board there isn't a next link yet because link has barely even become link yet. You're not a gambler because if you were you wouldn't have bought heavily into link, and you know there's nothing else in the market that compares to potentially crossing the crypto to tradfi finance gap. And if there were, this board would have already been all over it, for the same reason it still obsessively fuds link.

>>51193469
mcap is rather indirect, just because you hold 50% of a $2m mcap token doesn't mean you can extract $1m from it. prolonged selling over a long time is the smart way to do it to not influence the price too much. shitcoins don't operate like that, I think the devs of those can extract much less $ from their victims. so you really need to compare the final $ amounts.

link is probably not a scam, but the whole situation reminds me of star citizen. it's also not a scam, but the system is set up in a way that doesn't encourage ever finishing something, just promising things and extracting money from backers while you can. but at least there they can be held accountable because backers paid for something concrete, here they do it for a return on their money, but that's not the goal at all

>>51195478
>show me projects exhibiting these very specific, cherry picked conditions that best replicate what LINK has done
XRP, up more than x100 from the absolute bottom, despite shitting the bed for 4 years straight, XLM same thing
STEEM experienced a parabolic run against the entire market for 4-5 months, then disappeared completely
DASH experienced a mini bull before the 2017 alt run and then remained a top performer for almost an entire year
LTC experienced a huge pump deep in the 2014 bear market for about six months, and ever since then it's in a perpetual downtrend against BTC
XMR started a run in August 2016 that would last for a year and a half
it's still more than x100 from the bottom today
and the list goes on unironically
>Otherwise chainlink should have retraced all of its gains including from 2020/2019
newsflash, LINK HAS retraced all of it's gains from at least 2019 against BTC/ETH
>inb4 it doesn't matter lol rolf lmao
okay cope harder I guess
>>51195609
>I'm just having a discussion after mocking you and insulting you here
>>51192768
>>51192879
>>51193187
>>51193443
you are a hypocrite but whatever lol
>You appear to be
>That, or
nice assumptions fren, reality is I truly believe the "fud" is justified at this point and I'm genuinely baffled how you people furiously refuse to acknowledge it by burring your head in the sand
>You
>You
>You
I do not hold the same belief as you do, just accept it instead of trying to rationalize it according to your personal world view
>LINK fudders are almost certainly holders/paid fudders/have ulterior motive
>us and them
>there's nothing else in the market that compares to potentially crossing the crypto to tradfi finance gap
from my understanding, this is literally decades away at best, it is extremely naive to assume that these fragile scammy crypto entities will survive these current macro conditions

>>51195985
This is what mental illness looks like. P.S Im never selling AHAHAHHAA
I KNOW I KNOW UGHH
SORRY IM JUST NEVER SELLING IS ALL

>>51195478
>even if almost all disagree
>(((we)))
disgusting astroturfing attempt

>>51195985
I didn't say how much its up from inception, otherwise you can basically include every memecoin ever invented as few ever actually go back to literal zero, or take years to do so. I said what projects pumped outside of a btc bull cycle and then maintained those gains. STEEM disappeared as you said. DASH barely moved until 2017, then exploded like every other ICO scam.
LTC peaked vs bitcoin at the end of the 2013 cycle, and was in a downtrend ever since then.
Monero is a legitimate project with fundamentals (unlike the others you mentioned), although its not going to explode long term speculatively, it has a usecase and I actively use it myself for reasons that don't need to be disclosed here.
Link also hasn't retraced its gains against BTC, it started 2019 at 10k sats, so far it has bottomed at 20k this cycle. Obviously its been destroyed by ETH, primarily because ETH still holds tremendous value in a shitcoin casino environment (though not as much as BNB), while link is attempting to subsidize the shitcoin casino usecase in order to present itself as viable to much bigger fish. You can bet on that never happening and that's fair, but if that's your bet, why are you still holding link? I've conceded some of the fud points, where are your concessions for the reasons you remain a bagholder?
Again though, I didn't say some of the fud isn't justified. My point was you extrapolate and use bad faith fud and conflate it with good faith fud (token dumps, ponzi scheme etc) because you are demoralized. Obviously I can only speculate on your reasons, but you display enough intelligence that I know you aren't doing it out of ignorance.

>>51196204
astroturfing lol, you stupid fucking nigger. This anon did it ten times better than you, he actually made some profit. You're just a whiny faggot.

>>51196272
>show me projects exhibiting these very specific, cherry picked conditions that best replicate what LINK has done
learn to read, nigger
my point still stands despite all of your mental gymnastics
>where are your concessions for the reasons you remain a bagholder
I am not
>I've conceded some of the fud points
>I didn't say some of the fud isn't justified
there's nothing left to discuss

>>51184106
How did the FUD compare?

FUDmetrics is the only reliable trading method.

e.g this thread, good stuff.

>>51184695
Anon, be honest, do you think smart contracts have a future? And why do you think so?

>>51196299
>14pbtid
Get a fucking life you coping, bagholding loser.

>>51196497
>I am not
bullshit lol, post your sells, every nigger like you is the same, I challenge you to prove you sold and made all this money and nobody ever does. When anyone with this much of an ego about their investment would absolutely be making caps of every sell and bragging from now til the end of time and dabbing on baggies. I've seen one anon do it so far, and he actually sort of fucked up because he missed the entire bullrun, only saving grace being that link basically missed it as well.

>>51193208
>it's viable to take money from investors without giving them anything in return
Link has objectively accomplished more than literally any other crypto project in existence, by multiple magnitudes

>>51196637
>rampant projection
>total meltdown
>noooo you have to fit in to my predefined profile to justify your behavior!
kek, you are truly pathetic

>>51196665
go ahead post sells faggot shut the thread down
oh you can't
cause you're still holding and you want someone smarter than you to either give you renewed hopium or finally convince you to let go

>>51196682
it's truly hilarious how you constantly deflect and keep focusing on ad hominems lmao
I'm not a bagholder, never was :)

>>51196710
>I'm not a bagholder, never was :)
nobody believes you kek who are you even trying to fool?
it's much more entertaining than the non stop delusional hype posting and hopium over absolutely nothing, it almost feels cathartic
why would it feel cathartic if you didn't hold link?

>>51196710
Post your sells Jew

>>51196825
because it's a refreshing contrast to shillposting and it feels justified?
you really are dense aren't you?
I truly don't care about what you believe about me, whatever makes you feel better
I got what I wanted, the concession that at least some of the "fud" is justified
this is why I entered this thread in the first place>>51190713
feel free to keep projecting though

>>51196902
>feel free to keep projecting though
again incredibly ironic
>>51196710
>>51190801
>ca-thar-tic
>providing psychological relief through the open expression of strong emotions; causing catharsis.
now why would discussing fud for a project you never held provide psychological relief for you?

>>51196902
>60pbtid
Here we go again. Missed the thread and definitely not going to read all of it back, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that whatever you're claiming, peddling or arguing is 100% wrong.

>>51196933
why are you so angry? you seemed somewhat civil up until now, is it perhaps because of the sudden realization that the "fud" is not fud anymore?

>>51196902
>I truly don't care about what you believe about me
t. 61 pbtid

>>51196991
>Totally normal comment
>Why are you so angry?
12 year old League of Legends chat-tier mind games anon. Don't insult is with drivel like that.

Holy shit, the skinny fat manlet has pushed into the 60+pbtid range.

>>51196991
again ironic and projection considering you entered the thread seething and then attempted to downplay your seethe with keks when anons started to rustle your jimmies. I engaged you in good faith and it looked like you almost wanted to actually have a discussion but it turned into the usual "wah wah why can't I cry about link, but also you have to accept bullshit fud like its an outright ponzi and muh token dumps along with all the rest and if you argue with me you're a bagholder but not me I am too smart to ever touch link even though the anons who did buy are still up 30x from the bottom teehee also look at my cute emoticons that prove how above you all I am ;)

>>51197034
Yeah, and if he only posted once then you'd say "wow, what a coincidence that there's only 1pbtid!!! Must be a paid fud operation!". You people will use anything as evidence for your schizo theories.

>>51198416
>It is only possible to post once and abandon thread or derail thread with whining and sophistry for 60 posts on end
Yes sir, very much so. Surely there are no sensible anons who post a handful of times like a normal person.

>>51191664
Lmao. Spotted the newfag. 2018/19 fud was elder god tier

>>51184531
HAHAHA I was posting that shit like crazy "1k eoy guaranteed" god you stinkie linkies will stay poor

>>51192417
This post looks like Raziel secretely holds a Lot of link and is trying to keep out Kain and other degenerates to hold it.
Not sure if bot or left wing meme creator poster

>>51198611
>post 2 or 3 times in one thread

>LMAO look at how hard the jews are trying to pretend to be one of us!!! We have never had so much FUD!!! We must be getting close to the singularity since THE JEWS are posting FUD on 4chan. Look guys!!! Chainlink is now at $6.66. THE JEWS are sending a message that they already know the meaning of, but they don't want you to know what it means, even though the message is directed to you! The evil master plan can only be fullfilled if Chainlink retraces to $6.66, otherwise they would have been forced to scrap the whole great reset.

>>51200748
Le schizo has arrived

Link and XRP are not the same tech. Link is simply shit.

>>51196650
It has produced literally nothing. Not one thing.

>>51201516
Tell me, what exactly is XRP's tech?

>>51201635
Is /biz/ so trash now that they need to be spoonfed on how XRP fucking works? Jesus christ.

>>51201664
Sshh. I want him to explain what he thinks XRP's tech is. No need to get your panties in a bunch.

>>51201711
>panties
You said panties

>>51201711
>panties

>>51184479
It’s proven how easy it is for price to hit XXXX if everything runs on ledger than it’s over. Your opinion is irrelevant

>>51201727
>>51201874
>panties
>get (one's) panties in a bunch
>To become overly upset or emotional over something, especially that which is trivial or unimportant. Primarily heard in US.
>"Ah, don't get your panties in a bunch, I'll have the car back by tomorrow morning!"
>"In my opinion, people are getting their panties in a bunch over this election."
Don't gaslight me anons, pls.

I can’t believe i read this entire thread

>>51203625
Kek, same.

Jews, Weimar Republic captcha

>>51203625
What was the gist of 60pbtid ramblings?

>>51203802
That the fud is valid and based in reality, exemplified by the price action for the last 2 years, and the lack of feature releases. They also don’t hold link despite their intimate knowledge of the project and said features that have yet to release

>>51184629
i cant believe how many rippletards think swift is using xrp. swift has already got almost all of their 10k+ institutions using their GPI corda chain. is your shitcoin worth trillions yet?

>>51192417
this is the most 115 IQ writing i've seen in some time

>>51204470
Only things I am going to say to you is DYOR and Rosie Rios.

>>51203917
>They also don’t hold link despite their intimate knowledge of the project
that's really a testament to the quality of shilling that has taken place in this board these past 5 years
congrats on that

XRP needs LINK and LINK needs XRP. The two schizo houses will unite.

OP here checking back in. Im borderline suicidal, but lack the constitution to go through with it. Why THE FUCK can they just release staking. I swear the team gets off on watching us suffer. Theyre literally gonna wait until a recession /depression is confirmed and then announce a delay. I really hope the gods inflict the necessary karma onto Sergey and co. A true coward

Chainlink (ticker: LINK) is a scam that has gone too far. What started out as a bit of a prank on /biz/ has escalated to a disaster of biblical proportions. If you hold Chainlink (ticker: LINK) then you should sell your Chainlink (ticker: LINK) because Chainlink (ticker: LINK) is just an elaborate scam. If you’re considering buying Chainlink (ticker: LINK) then I would advise you to stay far away from Chainlink (ticker: LINK) and any trading pairs with Chainlink (ticker: LINK). Chainlink (ticker: LINK) is riding the DeFi hype wave to make it seem like a legit project, but Chainlink (ticker: LINK) tokens don’t actually do anything. The team sells Chainlink (ticker: LINK) tokens every week to keep the clown show running, and the Chainlink (ticker: LINK) team have cultivated a literal cult who will defend the actions of the Chainlink (ticker: LINK) to death. Please, I beg everyone to avoid Chainlink (ticker: LINK) at all costs. If you still hold Chainlink (ticker: LINK) tokens it is not too late to market sell your Chainlink (ticker: LINK) tokens.

HOW THE FUCK ARE WE LOWER THAN 2020 GOD DAMNIT MOTHER FUCKING COCKSUCKER

>>51204615
Yeah, that happens when drinking and trying to convey things carefully... kek. Points stand.

>>51205671
Sell

>>51196204
To any newfags being fudded. Ask yourself is it normal to sit in a thread of an asset you don’t hold and fud it for 12 hours straight?

>>51199938
>2018/19 fud was elder god tier
Pic related came out in early 2020, and is basically a collection of fud that got plastered all over /biz/ every day during 2018/2019.
It's all painfully tiresome and uninteresting, and none of it is "elder god tier".