/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51170487
nodes are not profitable.
crypto is a scam.
chainlink abused the truth and lied.
the project will die once they run out of tokens to dump.
rip anons the dream is dead. i start back at walmart tomorrow.

>>51170487
>"we are distributing tokens quarterly to make sure nodes are profitable."
Source?

>>51170608
blog.chain.link bro :'( its over

>>51170644
It's not in any of the staking blogs, post a link or image.

>>51170656
it is thats the truth see you at your local Walmart, space cowboy

>>51170670
>it is
No it definitely is not. Quote the relevant part.

>>51170487
profitable on some chains with low gas costs, meaning polygon and bsc
but of course now we have fast lanes coming...

>>51170679
>he trusts the official news
Does Chainlink ever release news that might be considered to be bearish?
I want to watch their Bancor and Celsius videos could you link them? I cant find them on the Official YouTube Channel

>>51170729
So post the original source.

>>51170736
pic related
post the Celsius and Bancor Chainlink endorsement videos

>>51170759
Gee that doesn't look like it's from blog.chain.link at all, does it?
The answer is Sergey never said all of the feeds were profitable, he said "multiple" feeds have.

>>51170487
>which is it?
neither
nodes are unprofitable
they're dumping for buying lambos and condos

>>51170802
I noticed that I provided a source while you are still moving goal posts like the crazed fudder you are.

Whats wrong tranny did sir gay fuck your plans right in your axe wound?

how do you put on your bra and panties on in the morning and pretend to be a woman?

You will never be a real woman!

Now post those Bancor and Celsius Chainlink YouTube Videos.

The ones where Chainlink officially endorses Celsius as a CeDeFi were my favorite!

>>51170850
>Now post those Bancor and Celsius Chainlink YouTube Videos.
Why? We aren't discussing that.

>>51170802
That's from blog.chain.link/rorypiantofficial newfag

>>51170868
I fucking knew it you goal post moving tranny fudder

Chainlink do not release bearish news they censor it!

Redacted!

This is not the truth!

Chainlink is a new form of control and manipulation

>nodes are profitable
*some* are but overall the network needs additional funding
>chainlink sent a bunch of LINK over to Binance to provide custody
Binance will be using that LINK as liquidity for their shorts just like Bancor and Nexo and Celsius!


Post the Bancor and Celsius Videos. I need to time travel so I can feel good about my investment.

I hold LINK and my name is Thomas.

>>51170868
>Why? We aren't discussing that.
Post the videos anon this is an open forum everything can be discussed.

>>51170850
>you are still moving goal posts
How the fuck did I move a single goalpost?
I directly answered the question in OP lmao

>>51170879
kek

>>51170868
>chainlink employee refuses to discuss forbidden topics

>>51170487
Nodes are profitable if they're in the hands of bizraelis otherwise the tokens go in the trash. Also staking coming soon

>>51170991
It's called moving the goalposts.

>>51171053
see >>51171086

>>51170487
>now: "we are bribing our node operators with tokens to make sure they don't leave the network"
FTFY

>>51170962
>>51170991
>>51171053
>Nodes are/aren't profitable
>BUT ANON WHAT ABOUT CELSIUS
>POST THE CELSIUS VIDEOS ANON
>YES POST THE VIDEOS WHERE CHAINLINK SAYS CELSIUS AND BANCOR ARE COOL PLATFORMS HAHA
>YES THOSE VIDEOS SOO CRINGE THEY ENDORSED PLATFORMS THAT WENT BANKRUPT HAHA
>AND THEN THEY DID THE SENSIBLE THING AND DELETED THE VIDEOS HAHA HOW CRINGE THEY SHOULD HAVE LET THEM STAY UP AFTER THE COMPANIES FLOPPED HAHA
This is what mental illness looks like. Look how these three clowns (or one dude with a VPN) immediately jump on anyone wondering why this is related to the topic at hand. OP was already low effort, but I guess it was still needed to derail the thread. Can't have any real discussion now, can we?

>>51171086
>>51171045
source was already provided, the discussion changed to Celsius and Bancor. Rory said new tokens are needed because not all networks are profitable.

If you can't provide these videos you prove my point and you also prove how worthless chainlink official communication is.

Imagine if their official communications were written on chain. You would be fucked then wouldn't you shill?

I hope Chainlink marketing learn about immutability sooner rather than later.

>>51171123
when you have as much btc as sergey and ari have, they can easily set a floor price for decades.

>>51171111
>what is immutability vs censorship
>what do chainlink aim to do?
>whose version of the truth gets published?
>chainlink nodes are not all profitable because the truth hurts
discussing the reason for chainlink is important to me.

I know this falls outside your approved talking points. I dont blame you for following orders.

Remember everpedia? Have they used Chainlink since? They also redacted their ties to Chainlink

>>51170487
Trust the circular reasoning.

>>51171123
>the discussion changed to Celsius and Bancor.
>Translation: I shoehorned in something irrelevant because I believe it incriminates Chainlink and embarrasses Linkies
You realize people can just scroll up in the thread right?

>>51171190
how is censorship and pushing a certain version of the truth irrelevant?

Bancor and Celisus and Rory's carefully worded blogpost are both examples of censorship and immutability retard.

If I had access to an immutable record on chain, you know what blockchains are supposed to be all about, with profitability of nodes and Chainlink marketing, there would be no debate, I could look it up myself.

Now I find myself in a relationship of just trust us paper promises with chainlink and it is no different to any other business

>>51171175
>blah blah blah
MOAB, Lady Luck, Celsius, Bancor what else? So embarrassing! My cheeks are bright red in shame for my employer. Rory will take full responsibility and commit seppuku at sunset. Please accept our deepest apologies.

>>51171123
>source was already provided
No it literally was not.

>the discussion changed to Celsius and Bancor
Yes, by you. As a goalpost move.

>>51171233
>Censorship is important to me as an employee of just another business
>you threaten my employer you threaten me because my employer sustains me
Your mind is trapped because you wage. You cannot consider the philosophical ramifications of a marketing powered virtuous cycle and thus you cannot met my talking points. It is not embarrassment it is censorship plain and simple. Everyone makes mistakes but the blockchain records everything. I hope you learn this otherwise Chainlink will fail to change anything then your employer will be unable to sustain you and you will wake up one day to find your skills and experience irrelevant

>>51171258
see >>51170759
Keep censoring Chainlink, that's your definitive Truth.

>>51171281
You moved the goalposts to Celsius and Bancor before that: >>51170729

>>51171292
both are examples of censorship. you asked for source I gave it. I expected the same when I asked for a source but you cant give it. how can I discuss anything with censorship lovers? kek I bet you cant even post nigger in your official capacity can you?

You are a nigger and you should go back to twitter. Source = me I am a licensed nigger you can trust me > Rory Piant

>>51171315
>both are examples of censorship
I asked for source on OP's claim, it has nothing to do with censorship.
If you want to yap about censorship start a different thread.

It's almost as if the token is not needed...

>>51171268
Always enjoyable to read your head canon.

>>51171315
>you asked for source I gave it. I expected the same when I asked for a source but you cant give it.
Provide a source for what REALLY happened during 9/11. If you can't you're a censorship lover. How is it relevant to the discussion? Well, the information is heavily censored and we're talking about censorship so.

>>51171322
>tries to censor you
I am happy here. does that strike fear into your heart wagie, am I threatening your employer? Also my financial interests but I would rather be poor than censored

I note that you have failed to defend yourself or present an argument to any of my points.
>goalpost moving
what is your goal? to answer a question you knew the answer to? to censor? to correct? to redact?
>blah blah blah company makes mistakes
everyone does but the reaction to the mistake is important to me. i know you clearly are just shills protecting what is left of your financial interest and your employer it seems but there are bigger and more philosophical issues at stake here

>>51171344
token is clearly needed to censor or redact things from the blockchain in the future. you would pay a chainlink oracle to delete any claim proven untrue in the present. Literal 1984 propaganda department come to life for crypto kek

>>51171421
I'm watching an actual mental breakdown live on the internet.

>>51170487
>LINK price when first statement was said: 20-25$
>LINK price of second statement: 5-6$

>>51171435
Guess why

>>51170551
Rekt nigger, why will you run nodes for a shit project? Go run nodes on QANplatform when it launches and you will know they are truly profitable. All you need is raspberry pi, a computer and some tokens for buying tickets, then you are good to go.

>>51171390
masons blew up the building for their XIIX tranny ceremony then framed the mud slimes for it. Meanwhile the glowniggers blew up the budget analysts office at the Pentagon to redact a trillion in debt which they recently printed so all square and level and by the compass. No one knows where the money went but I think it went into sustaining globohomo propaganda operations. Lots of cheddar cheese there fren but now with Chainlink they dont even need to put things they dont like onchain. no explosives or masons needed?

>>51171468
Interesting analysis, HOWEVER I SEE NO SOURCE

>>51171390
If you watch Iron Man 3 they show how Osama Bid Laden was really an English actor who loved coke and bussy and it was all basically fake as fuck. Transexuals in society now are the masons doing. One trillion back in the boomer 1990s man imagine how much you could F U N D.
>>51171426
Why dont the masons do something like that for Chainlink

>>51171487
you gotta watch every documentary you can get your greasy mits on and lurk the fuck moar srs

continue about your normie thinking gotta pound some bussy and feed my reindeer

>>51171497
>>51171514
I like this persona better than the one earlier in the thread. Good luck with the bussy fren.

>>51170656
Rory published this statement on Discord

https://discord.com/channels/592041321326182401/592041321787818015/1012708109770301492

>>51170487
Sergey said some DONs are profitable. ETH/USD is so used and has been so vastly sponsored that nodes don't need Chainlink Labs subsidies anymore on that specific feed, they profit from user fees only (e.g: Aave & Synthetix paying for accessing)

>>51170487
kek
users can now earn a portion of the fees paid to node operators. Sylo and ANKR are both doing this for node delegators.
unquestionably comfy and profitable

>>51171111
Checked and debator-pilled

>>51171538
> "published on discord"

>>51172105
???
it's the official server of Chainlink, the team posts there
in fact, rory is almost exclusively communicating through the discord these days

>>51172120
---FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE---
From the desk of Mr. Sergey Nazarov, Head of Chainlink Services:

Dear users,

I am a tranny, a troon.
Buy more now as
Staking is soon.

---MESSAGE TERMINATES---

Not for reproduction

>>51171111
lol quads of truth

Ignore and override.

>>51171344
its collateral

>>51170551
>>51170644
>>51170670
>>51170729
>>51170759
>>51170850
>>51170962
>>51171123
>>51171175
>>51171225
>>51171268
>>51171281
>>51171315
>>51171421
>>51171468
>>51171497
>>51171514
reminder that for every single chainlink you keep out of circulation, a flesh and blood eastern european halfwit just will feel a proportional amount of seethe and make dozens of posts just like these, just to convince you to sell
and that's enough reason for me to keep buying every single week

>>51173589
halfwit will feel*

>>51171514
17 posts by a seething tranny

>>51170802
Haha, you got served the official source and instead of addressing it, you are trying to turn it into a semantic, nitpicky one. Pretty sad

>>51173788
I got "served"?
I asked for source and got it, and then addressed the main question.

That faggot's the one who claimed the source was the blogs, which it wasn't.

>>51173838
You gave excellent customer service. Congratulations. You should get a promotion.

>>51173955
Yeah yeah yeah, go cope in the corner

>>51173788
Stop changing id you clown

>>51173838
And the real issue at hand is that the source is still official, but the URL is wrong, got it. You also claimed that OP is a faggot, do you have a source for that claim? I can't engange with your argument otherwise.

>>51170729
bancor video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2mVaPFFdoE

>>51175304
>the real issue at hand is that the source is still official, but the URL is wrong
Not the URL, the source.
And it's not an issue at all, I just asked for source and he couldn't tell me at first.

Are you ok? You seem pretty triggered.

>>51175304
>You also claimed that OP is a faggot
Here's the thing: no I did not.
I called this guy a faggot: >>51170644

And obviously that guy is OP (and you) or you wouldn't have mixed them up lol whoops!

Lmao I love this thread.

>>51176261
I scrolled through it but it just all looked like salty seething from Link haters. Nothing of any value. I'll continue to purchase Link as often as poss.