/biz/ - Business & Finance

>If SmartCon ends up being a let down, we'll have our confirmation
the last two shartcons weren't confirmation? they had swift come up and say they had no plans to use blockchain technology.

It will be a philosophical circle jerk, and nothing more. Piss poor node operators are not going to buy and stake millions of link and lock them forever. Nothing will change.

>>51004734
I read what you wrote, every word. But I'm not selling any Chainlink. Not before SmartCon, not during SmartCon and not after SmartCon. I'm not selling if it dumps to $0.10, and I'm not selling if it moons to $100.
How does that make you FEEL?

>>51004789
I feel sorry for you. Your ego got in the way of massive profits and you've been bleeding sats/eth ever since exactly 2 summers ago

>>51004762
>>51004776
This is why I say this one is it. They lost a lot of credibility with the first two SC but they were virtual and were given leeway because of the pandemic and a delay to ISO20022. Now, with charging over $1000 for tickets, the Big Mac cringe outreach, and the lack of any updates since Sergey's January 1st video, having a big event like this end in nothing will destroy their remaining credibility.

Tweeting daily about Binance shitcoin casino integrations has already eroded their image enough, but not having any institutions jump in makes it even worse.

>>51004734
thanks OP, what should we invest in then? I'm so fucken sick of waging and need a way out frendo

>>51004928
I would pile into ETH and AVAX right now

>>51004865
I feel more sorry for you, for thinking about me so much.

Look at the pic you retard. The only ones building these massive expectations are you faggots. We got fleeced. Dear god give us one exit pump

>>51004776
/thread

And then all the link marines aka XRP army 2.0 comes up w moarrrr breadkrumbbbzz. Fucking losers

>>51004789
>virtue signals while losing hundreds of thousands
>HODL MAR-ACK

>>51005252
>$7
>Coping about it by lashing out at critical thinking

>>51005252
Expect you dont actually believe this. Ironically enough that is exactly what was happenning w don draper in the meme youre using. Hahahaha

>>51005031
Fucking hell are you retarded?

>>51005363
Except*

>undisputed emperor of oracle services
>every dapp of consequence relies on them
>every chain awaits the arrival of chainlink nodes
>will order transactions on the global L1 and the biggest L2s
>faking it

>>51005364
No but it sounds like you're attempting to project

>>51005333
Checked. Bullish on fudders that /thread and then continue seething for half a dozen posts straight afterward lmao

>>51004734
What's this low level fud?

The switch to ETH2 with the merge is extremely complex and risky.
It doesn't make sense to increase your risk on two different systems when you can wait a few month to launch on the second system and not have to deal with the first and the risk of the transition.

The announcement was made in January because the plan was to release the features in May after the merge.
Unfortunately the delay of this merge caused the delay of the Chainlink feature releases.

Additionally some of the staking income comes from ETH2 changing its model to move some of their MEV to validators which will indirectly flow to Chainlink.
Other changes include a partner growth program, and being funded as a public good by the ETH infrastructure and getting special public good priority and cheaper ETH lanes for reduced fees.
The other part is the reliance of the L2 chains on the merged ETH version to reduce the risk associated with MEV.


And don't forget that Nexo is insolvent after shorting the bottom a second time.

>>51004865
You hold a lot of Link but I hope you lose the rest of it. You don't deserve to make it. Thought you should know.

>>51005031
Is this what you would do or what you have done? I'll pile into these two if you show your trades from link to ETH/AVAX or just whatever your stack size is for these two coins, PLEASE I can't trust people on here after all the fucken LARPS, there's so much fud and shills for link it's hard to know what's what

>>51005485
Thanks anon, that karma will come back for you

>>51005459
Bro you’re just speculating with muh crumbs like every fucking retard here and it never, ever ends up happening. How much more waiting and bullshit do we have to put up with? Why can’t Chainlink themselves be even a LITTLE bit transparent with where they’re at? It’s fucking September soon and we’ve got NOTHING. Honestly getting so sick of their bullshit. And I’m very confident SmartCon is just going to be some circle jerk bullshit around everyone’s aspirations around what they COULD be or WANT to be doing.

>>51005532
Telling toxic fudders they're ngmi even if they get rich has no karmic punishment because it's honest and true.
There are people on this board who will make 8 figures from LINK and look back at 5 years of fudding and just feel completely dead inside. I see them as the anons that will buy a penthouse and a lambo and fuck hookers and just waste their whole fucking life never even coming close to what really fills the hole or gives them true and lasting happiness.
People who make it through evil lose things that they can never buy back with wealth.

>>51005556
>Dear Slim

>>51004734
I'm sure it'll be hyped up, but ultimately none of the stuff they announce (yes, even staking and ccip) will result in the token being used in any meaningful way as to result in a large price increase. At best we'll hit $40 during the next bull run.

>>51005556
Checked status: denied

This thread has chaotic energy

>>51004734
haahhahahahaha

>>51005750
>when the fudders just rip off old shill memes
lmao says it all really

>>51005487
OP? where did u go

>>51005323
How funny would it be if the exact inverse of this text happened?

>>51005666
Honestly getting pretty scared of this being true. People will lose their mind and call me a fudder, but I don't give a shit. Reality is narratives drive EVERYTHING in crypto in terms of big price action. The most recent narrative Chainlink was able to capitalize on was DeFi. But that's been over for a very long time now. So what's next? Some might say CCIP, but I dunno, my gut tells me that even if they end up releasing CCIP the market just won't give a fuck, and instead they'll be pumping the projects that utilize CCIP. Also I hate to be a TA fag but even I think Chainlink looks absolutely abysmal on any chart you pull up. I don't want to believe it and I would love to be wrong, but holy fucking shit it's been 2 years of just constant pain. When do we realize we're fucked? After 3 years? 4 years? 5 years? It's starting to get absolutely insane how much we're putting up with.

>>51006422
>bitch moan whine
You don’t get it. Go sell and buy the flavor of the month coin.

>>51006422
10 yrs, fuck it 15 yrs.

>>51005666
I only have 100k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.

All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump.Link is only going to $50 max. Right now I might make 5MM before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 700K into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 10MM, but more likely 15MM to make it. The upper predictions for Link were about $80 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity. All of that isn't going to happen.

>>51004734
If only you anons knew. I’m nice so I’ll keep it short. Eth 2.0 will fail which will cause massive capitulation in the market sending all alts for a race to the bottom. The Chainlink team knows this and that is why they haven’t released staking or CCIP. Yes they completed it, back tested it and made sure it runs smoothly. It does, they are a competent team. However, it all comes down to Eth. If it shits the bed (which it will) then there really is no reason to release anything. They’re playing their cards right and are sitting back to wait for the dumpster fire.

You’ll probably know who I am but here:
The autumn leaves pierce the ground runs the squirrel to the nest - of broken pines and nettles.

>>51006422
If the CCIP we get this year is a full scale implementation of what it promises then it will be the biggest crypto happening in half a decade. It will eventually be that anyway.
The question simply comes down to whether the CCIP launch we get this year is the "full" product, or a very limited 0.1 version of the eventual goal. If it's the former then we literally make it this year.

>>51006465
If you have over 500 thousand dollars invested in any cryptocurrency you better have already made it. Seriously. 500 thousand dollars invested in play coins? And you’re just gonna throw it away?

>>51005323
chainlinktoday doesn't have insider info, I think.

>>51006480
That gay riddle made your larp so much worse

>>51006432
Explain to me what I don't get? The fact that we've got about 3 months left of the year and there's been no major release from Chainlink this year? The fact that we still don't have v0.1 staking, even though it's such a gimped version that it's kind of insulting that they're even calling it staking? Why does Chainlink keep announcing new services and features that never get past a whitepaper? Remember the military grade cope about how OCR was going to be a huge moment for saving gas and relieving the sell pressure from node operators? OCR came and literally nothing happened, in fact things have only gotten worse since OCR came out and that's one of the last things they've actually delivered. Let's ignore staking and CCIP and even think about where Chainlink is actually headed. It's been nothing but "integrations" with bullshit copy-pasted scams for years now. At what point does Chainlink start to transition to something beyond this? Sergey claims that he speaks with banks and institutions but where's the actual results?
>>51006500
They would never, ever release CCIP with a big bang like that. If we thought the staking release was slow and conservative, then CCIP will be even worse with how they're going to manage the risk of that release. That one I at least understand why they would take care with releasing CCIP. But as time goes on I'm really getting fed up of the wait for staking. It just doesn't make sense, the "they're just waiting for ETH2" shit just seems like complete cope as usual, too.

>>51006604
lot of words cowboy, maybe just stop thinking bout it and it’ll all work out

>>51006626
You faggots are all the same kek. Just refuse to even acknowledge anything that isn't glowing praise.

>>51006652
>Just refuse to even acknowledge anything that isn't glowing praise.
It's the only way to get by. To remain delusional for longer than the market can remain irrational.

>>51006604
Just as I thought. You’re retarded. No more (yous)

>>51006500
>The question simply comes down to whether the CCIP launch we get this year is the "full" product, or a very limited 0.1 version
trying to rush something like that and not make sure it's perfect would be brash of them. I'd expect no less than slowly building it up to integrate, and it likely would need full on staking to be released for the economic security protections to be in place
it's a sure thing, but it's one thing to be sure not to rush

>>51006652
You just spouted out a bunch of nonsense you realistically know nothing about and are now agro. Gtfo and have a smoke or take a nap.

>>51006663
Point out the retarded parts. I know you'll just cop out by saying durr it's all retarded. But try actually argue where I'm wrong.

>>51006666
>it's a sure thing
Checked. That's honestly the part that I worry about. Is it? I have absolutely no doubt that Chainlink are the most capable, professional and talented team in the space, and one of the most talented and well resourced early stage tech companies on the entire planet, but what CCIP aims to do just seems... impossible. So fucking complicated. Reconciling all of those settlement environments with the level of assurance that we expect from their price feeds.
Sometimes I get bullish as fuck and sometimes it seems like they're talking about sending a rocket to Alpha Centauri, it just seems beyond reality.

>>51006666
checked

>>51006730
Agreed, I don't see CCIP as a guaranteed thing. I can admire the technical challenge they're taking on with CCIP, but it does seem unbelievably difficult to pull off. It's not surprising that it's taking a really long time. We've gotten bits of info like the role of the anti-fraud network will play in CCIP, even just focusing on that is a huge piece of work and the more I think about the anti-fraud network the more questions I have. They're taking on a huge problem.

>>51006547
Lurk moar

>>51006727
Everything you mention is wrong and in general stupid knowledge.
>>51006730
CCIP is possible. It is a protocol. Guess what. Chainlink nodes need to be bidirectional. They need to be both validator on a chain and a DON(Oracle). Guess what, if you’re a validator on 1 chain, and a validator on another chain. Then you can send communication from one chain like a read or append to another chain. But before it reaches that next chain, the validity of the communicated info needs to reach consensus. You get where I’m going with this? This also allows for Chainlink to adhere to the consensus of the protocol. If ETH was POW then some Chainlink nodes would also be POW. And that’s an extremely unnecessary amount of energy being wasted. But POS ETH means that there is 1:1 functionality in both directions since we already know Chainlink is meant to be POS.

>>51006817
Another nothingburger post. Well done you retarded faggot.

>>51006817
>the consensus of the protocol
Replace protocol with mainchain.

>>51006801
Larp moar

>>51004734
>the rumor that Eric takes over as CEO
lol
some guy making an insider larp isn’t a runor

>>51006817
kek you know it's a good post when you get a seething tranny to respond within 90 seconds.

>>51004734
>That they've been faking it til they made it
They have already made it. This is like saying Michael Jordan was faking it after he won his 6th championship and proved there was nobody better. Chainlink is already objectively the single most successful project in crypto, they have provided more tangible results than anyone, by a huge margin. kys fag

>>51006850
Suddenly I’m not good enough for the argument

>>51006850
>>51006910
Your brains are so fried where all you can think of is fucking trannies kek. Genuinely need to seek help.

>>51006948
thank you for being so concerned for both my financial and now my mental well being. however i regret to inform you i will not be selling any of my chainlink tokens. have a nice day.

>>51006948
Concerned hodler, thanks for your inquiry into my financial assets. Fortunately, I know more than you and I’ve decided I won’t sell YOU a single link unless you’re willing to pay 100K/LINK.

>>51005778
he eats too many big macs.

>>51006839
>only pretending to be retarded
Good for you

SirGay

>be me
>open link thread
>new chainlink fud thread
>read a few posts
>this is a quality chainlink fud thread!
>scroll to bottom
>post this experience for you to seeth about
>listen to slushwave
>/comfy/ knowing everyone in crypto is focused on fudding me out of my bags
gods damn this is good. i need another drink

>>51005625
>>Dear Slim
Bruh, you just know you is talking to some fattie

>>51007693
two more weeks right marines?

>>51007722
Bruh, checked but smartcon is end of September. Are you a retard?

>>51007693
>Dat filenames
Did you save this from Discord, Bruh?

>>51006666
Nigger it’s 5 years

>>51007731
They will announce the beginning of the start of rolling out staking

>>51006817
Good annalysis. Are you an insider or just a smart guy?

>>51006799
Scoping issues like that (let's integrate all third parties) are often a death sentence for startups, because investors demand visible progress or else they pull funding. Because CL uses their token as funding, they have no accountability here, so they can waste as much money on any impossible task they want. It's a bit like Star Citizen in that way, people just continue to give them money, why rush to deliver anything?

>>51007999
lmao why do you keep posting about Star Citizen >>/biz/?task=search&ghost=&search_text=star+citizen

>>51004734
>The mixing in well known companies into their speaker list, despite it being subsidiaries for companies like SAP and Samsung
... what?

>>51008059
it's not a bad comparison at this point

>>51008085
>t. that guy with the same set of pics and responses in every link thread
source?s4apjv

>>51008098
... double what?

>>51008120
Bruh really? Chainlink dumps fewer tokens than other blockchains. Can you give me a source on this claim?

>>51005459
I hope, I fucking HOPE, that Chainlink is going to release something and in the same breath show a path to FSS, because I can't stand listening to these faggots in the core devs call giving their ass to Flashbots and MEV Boost. Let's fight censorship with... CENSORSHIP, holy fucking retards. How blind are they all. Ari, save us.

>>51008138
Are you having some kind of mental breakdown?

>>51008143
Oh well I guess Chainlink do dump more tokens than Solana...

>>51008139
>MEV
By the way, why is nobody on this board discussing about the implications of MEV BOOST.

>>51008149
Tell me more...

>>51008169
Chainlink have dumped more tokens and you don't have a single picture to refute? Bruh...

>>51008178
Why are you even talking about this to me?

>>51008180
I know you have a picture on standby to change my mind...

>>51008186
I posted a single word in this thread: "what".
Why are you talking to me about Solana token dumps?

>>51008207
Bruh source?

>>51008249
Please just explain this extremely bizarre behavior.
I posted a single word: "what", and you start talking to me about Solana token dumps.

What are you doing, dear anon?

>>51008268
Bruh where is that picture you usually post to refute the claim.

Also BTC dumps have no relationship to Chainlink price points... prove me wrong

>>51008343
>that picture you usually post
What a strange thing to say to someone who only posted the word "what".

>>51008345
>What a strange thing to say to someone who only posted the word "what
Bruh what?

>the pretending to be mentally ill derailers have arrived

>>51008514
>>the pretending to be mentally ill derailers have arrived
Source?

>>51008601
you

>>51004734
Chainlink is going to have to fire a lot of employees. They grew too big too fast and their teams are not well organized.
I could go on but I won’t.

>>51006666
5 years
“Rush”

Pick one. Disengenious faggot

>>51006817
Zero substance w this post. Duuuuuude its soooooo complicated. Exactly, they cant do it, which is is why they release NOTHING

>>51006890
Hahahaha nice bait. Swap out michael jordan for some crackhead that failed out of college and never won anything and then we’re good.

Man its gonna be another great week of vaporware “integrations”. Ill head over to CL’s twitter to see all the EXCITING progress theyre making

>>51009602
Well, more progress than ETH lol

I'm sure it will have a lot of interesting new developments, after all, the team has consistently delivered: DECO, mixicles, offchain computation, corporate partnerships (AWS, Google, SWIFT, Oracle, and more), staking, CCIP...

Oh wait, those were all vaporware kek

>>51009635
Sounds like all of the based integrations and featured ETH promised EEA, usecases beyond shitcoins, industry usage, the future of finance, oh wait we got animal tokens a Vitalik-backed doge clone and nfts woo

>>51009666
You forgot about Lady Luck. That integration is huge.

Seriously the entire company is vaporware. I genuinely do not think they intend to have a product at any point in the near future

>>51009687
Shiba is more of a scam than ladyluck which was a more complex and interesting usecase than a doge clone lmao

>>51009687
Don't forget MOAB.

>>51009733
how many scams has the ETH foundation endorsed? oh right they never needed to back any projects because MEV was their main source of revenue

>>51009635
lmao

>>51009767
Difference is after 5 years ETH had pumped an enormous amount. Meanwhile we're 5 years in and back to single digits kek. Just unreal.

>>51009875
I know man but you are comparing ETH pumping because of animal coins and NFTs alongside LINK which has started a bunch of unique usecases for the industry. Name one thing that ETH has done in the last five years to further crypto as an industry. They want to act like POS is revolutionary I used to stake Reddcoin back in the day kek

>>51009915
> alongside LINK which has started a bunch of unique usecases for the industry.
literally all vaporware.

>>51009931
holy checked and based none of it is SHIT you stupid cults sell your pathetic worthless trash now now NOW NOW NOOOOWWWWWW!!!!!

>>51009931
name one thing that any of the top cryptos have done for crypto as an industry in the last five years

>>51009915
Chainlink is revolutionary, but token are not needed. Eth is needed for gas, wtf is even chainlink is for the retailers?

>>51009687
>>51009635
They delivered Data Feeds, VRF, Proof of Reserves. Everything else has been seldom spoken since and is complete vaporware at this point in time. How many millions did Ari Jules get for all of his vapor scams that Sergey bought? Don't forget Sergey being in bed with Bancor and Mashinsky. I can't believe the later doesn't piss more people off and Sergey / Chainlink gets a pass.The reason Chainlink did so much marketing with Bancor and Celsius is because those were the most legit teams in their ecosystem.

>>51009963
payments collateral read one of their blogposts they have seventy seven usecases for tokens needed. eth? payments to whom? you know merge is removing miners dont you?

>>51004865
I didn't want to talk to you, why are you harrassing me?

>>51009958
Nothing - the entire industry is vaporware and purely speculation on liquidity from the Fed. I'm a profit maxi, don't care about the nonexistent tech. Don't fight the Fed.

>>51009976
>data feeds
Decentralized oracles aren't needed, anyone can write up a program to average over a few exchanges.
>VRF
Only used for NFT scams
>proof of reserve
Lol

>They delivered Data Feeds, VRF, Proof of Reserves. Everything else has been seldom spoken since and is complete vaporware at this point in time. How many millions did Ari Jules get for all of his vapor scams that Sergey bought?
LINK has been involved with a fair number of scams desu.

>>51009976
they used to market aave and synthetix but then anons started attacking stani and asking anti semitic questions re silver on synth

>>51009976
>I can't believe the later doesn't piss more people off and Sergey / Chainlink gets a pass.
Nulinker scum don't know how hard Sergey shilled Celsius back in the day.

>>51009993
Finance is a scam in general anon why do you think they put so many occult symbols on money. jesus threw the money changers out of the temple for a good reason
>desu
this is not 2010 anymore boomer

>>51010013
this. he would have got on his knees for the Ukrainian holhol jew

>>51010013
Newfriends don't remember Confido and JOOOOOOOOOOST

>>51010013
It’s probably one of the biggest things that pisses me off about Chainlink. From day 1 we knew Celsius was a disaster waiting to happen. The red flags were spotted almost straight away. We know they lurk here, there’s absolutely no way they didn’t have any visibility on Celsius’ “Head of Institutional Investing” or whatever the fuck it was. Despite that, not only did Chainlink work with Celsius, they gave them a huge platform and promoted Celsius numerous times, even at their previous SmartCon. I’ll never forget the fucking moronic “CeDeFi” term that Celsius coined. Just the most retarded shit and Chainlink STILL insisted on working with these scammers. Just how much money was wasted on that bullshit? Mistakes will always happen in business, but I struggle to understand how they made THIS mistake. We’re just a bunch of losers who research this shit for free and knew something stunk about them pretty much straight away, Chainlink has paid employees who either didn’t do their own research or for whatever insane reason just didn’t care about the risk of working with Celsius. The worst part is because some people put their trust in Chainlink they saw their work with Celsius as some kind of endorsement that Celsius is a good business to use and now we’ve got people who have lost everything. Now, to be clear you shouldn’t ever trust Chainlink or anyone in that type of thing and should always do your own research, but it’s still just fucking sloppy on Chainlink’s part they did that.

>>51010145
>Chainlink has paid employees who either didn’t do their own research or for whatever insane reason just didn’t care about the risk of working with Celsius.
You misspelled Sergey. Again, why does he always get a pass when he makes every final decision.

>>51004734
Or course it will be a letdown. Every step of the way Chainlink has been about dangling carrots in front of donkeys and seeing how far they can be lead along. 24 hours til arbitrum guys

>>51010145
The arc of
Sergey shills Celsius -> the pornstar debacle (which biz lead) -> their collapsing and almost taking down the whole market
is one of the most underappreciated and hilarious crypto stories of all time.

>>51010184
It is a failure of the entire organization, and yes ultimately Sergey needs to take accountability for the fuck up.

>>51010192
And Mashinsky is MIA, right? Has there been any updates on that fucking dude?

We're getting staking at or before smartcon. We're gonna pump to at least ATH before EOY. Not even memeing.

>>51010223
Hope to see the Machine at SmartCon. When he rants about how irresponsible the central banking kikes are I get rock hard. also nasa is working for him so you just know they are legit :^)

>>51010230
Chainlink will be under $2, probably under $1, this year. Equities will drag the market down. Book it.

>>51010268
kiddo please chainshit will be -0.00 divided by zero

>>51010268
>>51010276

stop shilling you fucking linkers. Everyone knows Link is going below 0, Linkers are actually gonna have to pay to get rid of their coins. Failure to do so and the FBI will have to seize their assets. Such is Sergays hellish pleasure.

>>51010321
bro link is going so low ed felten will NEVER be able to add another zero

>>51006480
I know who you are

The WEF is an international lobbying firm comprised of 1,000 or so member companies. It is based in Switzerland and staffed by predominantly Europeans. It is a vehicle to promote the interests of multi-national megacorps. To become a member, a company must turn over a minimum of $5 BILLION USD every year. In total, their member companies control approximately $5 trillion in assets.

The cumulative liquid ad spend for the member companies goes into the hundreds of millions to billions range. What this means is that if they want to astroturf a trend, person, or idea: they absolutely have the means to do it.

Being an unelected, totally unaccountable global group, they're able to skirt laws of their host countries. They've been referred to as a terrorist organization by experts and citizens of countries all across the globe.

It's time we stand united against terrorist organizations like the WEF that wish to subvert and destabilize our countries. Everyone can play their role by voicing their concerns to their elected representatives, boycotting, sanctioning and divesting from member companies, and applying social and electoral pressure to all their "young leaders" and affiliates.

The "far-right" and "white supremacist domestic terrorists" hoaxes are inventions and products of the WEF. COVID and all the responses to it were a WEF creation. The explosion of in-your-face homosexuality and degeneracy is a WEF creation. The effective poisoning of our food, water, and minds is a product of the WEF.

For extra seethe, sign this petition and have your "automated internet friends" sign it too and let's remind them who is in charge.

https://www.change.org/p/declare-the-wef-a-terrorist-organization

>>51007971
I just read the white paper.
>>51009560
It’s not complicated. If ETH stays POW, Chainlink nodes on ETH must also be POW. And that will basically imply double the energy consumption and waste. Chainlink nodes must be validators and part of a DON.

>>51010342
The zero that’s being added is me, a valueless loser, back into society.

>2020: duuuuuude chainlink is blockchain agnostic. ETH will bend the knee

>2022: broooo everyone know we had to wait for the merge. Duhhhh didnt you read the whitepaper

These goalposts are getting heavy

>>51011289
Seems like you’re moving the goalposts. Chainlink nodes are validators on all other L1s, and soon to be ETH. The seething tranny returns. What’s your price per word posted? You started out as a concerned Chainlink holder but pivoted immediately. Did they tell you to switch the script after I posted that? Did they threaten your pay rate?

>>51011289
Chainlink is literally blockchain agnostic, has been for years now.
But ETH is still the biggest backend chosen by Chainlink users, so major ETH milestones are really important.
Not hard to understand.

>>51008085
Means it’s not SAP, it’s their startup subsidiary. It’s not Samsung it’s Samsung Next which just invests in a bunch of bullshit. It’s not T-Mobile it’s their garage project node operator subsidiary

>>51011352
when if ever will you sell or just stake?

>>51011444
Holy cope lmao.
None of the companies you mentioned have blockchain as their core business, of course a backend innovation goes through the relevant subsidiary. It's still those companies.

>>51011449
What’s the point in selling? You can even see it now, that people want you to sell. Why is that? There are people paying for others to post on an anonymous forum about selling. I’d rather participate and get any amount of link as a percentage of my actual stack. I don’t care if I’m getting 1% on my stack paid in link if it means I’m making money hand over fist.

>>51011509
as someone who worked in a conglomerate i can confirm the general name everyone says they work for and is a household name is just a holding company, everyone works at various branches or separate companies under the umbrella. its done for legal reasons and so that divisions can be bought and sold.

>>51011605
Exactly. For instance: Google itself is a subsidiary of Alphabet, and then Google the subsidiary is in turn further subdivided into subsidiaries. You have to be a literal child not to know about this shit

i'll keep posting this as long as these retarded threads continue to get made. if you're reading this, ignore the rest of the thread, buy more link, never sell your link. that's literally all you have to do to make it.

sage

>>51011709
You are so fucked in the head if you sincerely believe that anytime there are posts critical of Chainlink that it's some psyop kek. Maybe there is some of that, I have no idea. But you're an absolutely clueless moron if you really don't think there are people who aren't quite happy with how their investment is going at the moment.

>>51011734
Trust me, he's not referring to posts that are merely critical lmao

>>51011734
this. We've sat through years of $1000 MARINES HOLD and then it's turned into "Oy vey, why do they persecute me so?" Not saying the link fud isn't getting out of hands but jesus stinkers have thin skin
>t. 600 LINK after losing it all in bancor

>>51011749
>I get triggered when people talk about their investment
lmao and you're accusing others of having thin skin.

>>51011749

>>51004865
STOP IT

>>51005459
one of the devs in the official discord said eth merge had nothing to do with the delay

>>51011769
>hehwe bwoi you're triggered
you caught me I'm literally shaking tumblr bros how can we recover

>>51011814
Ah yes the great conspiracy to push down Chainlink threads on /biz/ because somebody out there is suppressing this $3.3b cap project

>>51008152
everyone is sick of meth heads building in things to skim off the top. We are all waiting for L2 and FSS. Im still suspect of arbitrum cause of the kike on their team. Im bet they are doing the same shit

>>51011847

>>51011847
>you caught me
I didn't catch you, you just told us yourself.

>>51011864
>>51011870
(^:

The mental gymnastics required to make yourself believe theres some giant conspiracy to change the minds of the 50 autists that post on the shithole daily is hilarious. Fucking morons

>people don’t like Chainlink
>people don’t like Chainlink and come to Chainlink threads to post about how much they don’t like Chainlink

top zozz

>>51011919
it's a chainlink fud thread. Why are link holders coming to a fud thread to talk about Link?

>>51011905
yeah there is not nearly enough liquidity here for that. I think it's a vestige from when link was a total shitcoin and link holders were "just fudding their own token because they're bored." I fud everything because I'm bored, but honestly hbaggies have replaced stinkers for most annoying community on /biz/ imho, worse than icpiggers

>>51011905

>>51011962
>Mom im breaking up da fuddder conspiracy!!!!
>hurrr durrr heres an article that explains the “psyops” broooo

What a fucking loser.

>>51011986
just baiting out the replies to archive the fact that whenever i post that article the fudders instantly switch to ad hominems, like clockwork. thanks for contributing.

>>51009999
Checked. What questions were they asking, Id love to know.

>>51012010
>whenever i post that article the fudders instantly switch to ad hominems
kek, like a charm

>>51012010
>>51012135
>post something that is impossible to dispute
>heh fucking owned
I mean I can accuse you of being a shill but that doesn't really get us anywhere else either does it? When you carefully construct your own reality where everyone who says bad things is a fudder, paid shill, or both, then yeah I guess you won the argument in your own frame of reference.

Or -- you can come back to reality and realize that maybe people who are calling you a faggot are calling you one because you are kek

>>51012228
Look how triggered you just got

>>51012281
no u

It's beginning to dawn on me that we've been had. Sergey turned out to be no different than the teams of other vaporware projects, with great ideas but fucking abysmal execution

>>51006626
>>51006663
stop trolling you mutt. You know what anon is saying is right. This smart con is going to make or break sergeys reputation with long term token holders

>>51012371
Now you’re starting to believe. He promised a lot and delivered absolutely nothing, hence $6.99 chicken wing prices instead of the $1000 eoy memes

>>51009268
Go on anon... I think we all knew that was an inevitability

>>51013156
They act like a big company but honestly they can’t afford to be this bloated and slow moving.

They hired a lot of big names and ex-FANG employees and yet their execution is lacking.

Worst of all they are ruthless to the point that they’re fucking up their own up and coming projects with enterprise.

Crypto is unregulated and because of this it leads to perverse incentives between business and client. Due to short sighted greed and a lack of execution they’ve fumbled more than potential integration.


They have the wrong people in the wrong positions and are too big for their own good. Heads will have to roll if the company plans on surviving.

>>51011352
>duuuuuuude theyre running a paid campaign on a pajeet forum w total net worth of $500k

Fucking moron.

>>51011352
5 years later. You can’t stick your head in the sand anymore.

Imagine thinking youre already at FAANG level with ZERO of the revenue. What a fucking idiotic business plan.

>hundreds of millions in expenses w zero working product
>anyone who criticizes that is a fudddder

This is what happens when you let a sociology major start a business

>>51013948
Unironically they would have been better off hiring more link marines and less ex-fang and roasties.

I doubt they’ll swallow their pride at this point and do the needful. I see them doubling down acting like they’re untouchable but mark my words, they’ll have to fire a shitton of their overpaid team if they intend on surviving.

5 years after ethereum was created, the value of the token reflected the usage

5 years after chainlink was created, and you have a bloated company with useless ex-fang employees and roasties.

Time to get real or fail. You can’t afford another 5 years like this.

>>51013858
>Worst of all they are ruthless to the point that they’re fucking up their own up and coming projects with enterprise.
What?

>>51014068
Dollar signs spinning in their eyes leads to them putting the cart before the horse and getting ahead of themselves and fucking up potential integrations by fumbling the bag.

Remember what they did to Andre’s keepers? You can only rip off so many people before others become wary.

They think the programming part is hard but it’s not. Securing the deal with the client and data provider is the difficult part.

>>51014201
>Andre’s keepers
Keepers existed long before Andre lol

>>51014229
Andre was a smartcon darling until they finished using him. I’m no Andre fanboy but what they did was not kosher.

It’s one thing to be ruthless it’s another thing entirely to be ruthless AND clueless. Even worse, they are ruthless, clueless, AND disorganized.

>>51014277
?
Sergey flushed a turd that was already circling the drain. Who cares about Andre anymore?

>>51014277
>Andre was a smartcon darling
pffffhahaha what the fuck does this even mean, he attended one smartcon. So did tons of people.
He probably got uppity, acting like he invented keepers or something.

>what they did
Which is?

>>51013858
how do you assess smartcontract.com and then chainlink funded themselves since 2015?

there were VC funding involved in the ICO in 2017 and it was enough to pay steve, rory and adelyn...
Then they derisked supposedly $1b of their stack in 2021

They can operate forever with a potentional fraudulent non delivering business right? When will we know?

>>51014302
>>51014305
Read my posts. I don’t give a fuck about Andre. I could have given other examples but that’s privileged information so I referred to Andre, a public example.

>>51014305
They’re in denial about this themselves and are living in a bubble. The company has become so big that the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing.

If they can only have meaningful integrations with other blockchain native companies then it should be clear that they’re just spinning their wheels.

There is a lot more I can say but it will have to be left at that. I wish the team well but some of them really need to get their heads out of their asses if they plan to survive as a company.

>>51014423
>I could have given other examples
You haven't given a single one.

>>51014423
wtf are you talking about

>>51005556
Kek they are the most adopted infustructure in crypto and the only team with a real vision to get mainstream adoption how much MORE do you fucking need?? Changing the financial system takes time and the upcoming upgrades are the biggest they've ever released. Price feeds and VRF is child's play compared to what's coming, and it is coming, whether you fud it or not

>>51014568
>Changing the financial system
You sound so fucking delusional lmao. Let me guess you think bitcoin is going to replace banks too right?

guys do not worry i am a young healthy buck with 700links and i will keep transmuting my entropy into link tokens . I got this il keep this company afloat do not worry.

>>51014568
Cope. Arbitrum doesnt use VRF by the way

>changing the financial system

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH…. Wait wait, HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAAHHAHAAH. By doing what exactly???? Muhhhh nigger farmer crop insurance???

Links only lasting impact on finance will be from a regulation standpoint (Link is a small scale enron)

>>51014632
Yep lol. He prob also thinks holding gamestop is killlling daaaaa hedgies!!!

>>51014632
Don't hold any bitcoin sorry. If you really don't think this is world changing tech then you'll never make it

>>51014656
Holy fuck you faggots love projecting. I hold only Link and Linkpool

>>51006691
>anything I don’t like is nonsense! Blah blah blah I can’t hear you!

I'm in the top 1000 wallets holding LINK, why would I care how long it takes. The only ones coping are the linklets who bitch and complain about deadlines that haven't even passed yet. It really must suck being poor and stupid

>>51014661
Duuuuuuuuude its gonna change daaaa system, because IT JUST IS OKAY!!!!

- every crypto bagholder community.

Daily reminder that dog coins have more real world use than Link

>>51014775
For trading yeah ride meme coins whatever. But for a long term hold, I couldn't imagine holding anything else but LINK. Some people just have different risk tolerances. I don't want to get sucked into this shitcoin casino, most of you fuckers probably have a gambling addiction. I feel nothing holding LINK

>>51014758
Yeah that must be the lowest IQ fud in /biz/ history, and that's saying something
>they told us "this year" and it's not out in August waaaaaaah

>>51014934
>>51014758
No one is complaining about the deadline you goddamn retards. We’re calling out the piss poor price action and how none of the “releases” actually did anything to the price.
>y-you’re fudding
Do we look like we’re trying to fud, or are you actually autistic? Maybe you’re in denial or actually retarded

>>51014997
Exactly, only a poor faggot cries so much about price action

>>51014932
Dude this isnt a safe play at all. WTF are you smoking????? They have NOTHING… ETH was the “safe” crypto play last year and it 10x’d, while link crabbed and dumped. This is only a “long term play” bc thats all the cope you have left. Even in the long term, Doge is a better play than this. I will for sure be able to buy a car w doge, whereas half the link team may be in prison.

>>51015021
And even poorer faggots lamp about their stacks lmao

>>51015021
Projection

>just lose all your money and dont complain brooooo

>>51015074
Kek this
>I lost 90% of my net worth. S-so what?

>>51015087
Yep. Linkies virtue signaling how theyre not bothered by their own team shitting all over them is the biggest cuckold/cringe thing on biz

>>51014932
Stockholm syndrome

Bought link in 2017 because of Sibos. And here we are, hoping the next defi vaporware will pump link. I already have written Link off mentally, not planning on selling but I'm looking to make money in other areas in life. It's just pathetic at this point, the big mac announcement was the final straw. The linkmarine community is fucking cringe aswell, and biz is left with deluded bagholders. It gave me a greater peace of mind desu, to stop hoping about LInk finally doing something. I'll see what happens with my bags in the future.

>>51014758
just hold onto your investment till your dead bro

>>51014997
>Do we look like we’re trying to fud
Yes

>>51016100
that is literally my plan. My kids will get 20k LINK.

>>51016115
Do you really want your kids to think that you hated them?

>>51014277
He tried to have his own little scam token to work with his keeper solution and that obviously wasn't compatible with chainlink.

>>51016115
are you trying to make moves on the global stage to actually change the world for the better or just to buy chink luxury goods for you retard kids to just fuck it up in a generation

>>51016280
Option C. Remote off grid organic farming.

>>51016316
you wont be able to just hide out in the woods you get that right? theres a reason that faggot elon is building a global internet grid

yawnnnnnnnn

>>51016431
>>51016449
you can post screen grabs all you want. Fact of the matter is that the team never deliviers. This project has been working from 2k17. Most game devs finish a full fledged game under two years

>>51011962
kek funny how this one word has identified that other guy as a definite mining the chans nigger and reignited my sense of community with LINK and 4chan thank you based anon

>>51004789
It makes me feel sorry for you anon, you could have made it but instead you let memes take control of your life

>>51005252
Anon, in that image the pink wojack is the bag holder and sirgay doesn't give a shit about him. It's not some epic ownage of people who missed out on the rocketship to destitution that is chainlink

>>51016431
>>51016449
>j-just another 5 years of crumbs and crabbing and dumping, HODDDLLLLLLLLLLLL LINK MARINES, sirgay said he'd have a burger with you

Fucking cringe.
Kill yourself bagholder, linkies are more deluded than xrp schizos at this point.

>>51016463
Hell yes brother, I'm going to buy ethereum personally, I heard on reddit that its the internet of money, and all my favorite crypto youtube personalities suggested it due to the Merge, which is going to revolutionize crypto as we know it.

>>51016431
Similar to the delusional HBAR corporate breadcrumbs. Meds, now

>>51016563
As the person who made the meme I can tell you the wojak is fudders constantly screeching. It makes no sense for bagholders to say they feel sorry for Sergey.

>>51005587
>Spelling out the flaws of an ERC20 token I'm invested in is EVIL.

>>51016925
you forgot to post ACK

>>51016975
the -ACKing is yet to come, we've still got 3 months left till EOY after all.
I expect New Years Eve to be a BROOTAL time, a spike of suicides.

>>51016431
So sirgay gave another one of his butt buddy "advisors" millions of dollars to buy his vaporware buzzword project with a faggy name like Space and Time. Kek. Delusional. Where have I seen this before? Oh right, DECO, Time Crier, Keepers.

>>51006480
winter begins, price goes to shit, everyone sells?