/biz/ - Business & Finance

duh

That's not Vitalik

>>50979356
that's not vitalik, schizo

>>50979388
This, op, not even the same name

>>50979356
No shit.

Eip4488.

Don't even need to look at the chart to know this resulted in a 2% dump.

>>50979407
Wtf a somethingburger

>EIP-4844 proposal - by Vitalik Buterin - aka Proto-Danksharding introduces a new kind of ethereum transaction type

https://www.eip4844.com

>Post-merge: A new specialized class, called block builders, bid on the right to choose the (tx list) contents ... and proposer (formerly, miners) need only select the (builder) with highest bid. Only builder can process the entire block (and even there, possible to use third-party decentralized oracle protocols to implement a distributed block builder); other validators and users can verify the blocks.

https://notes.ethereum.org/@vbuterin/proto_danksharding_faq#What-is-Danksharding

>Post-Merge: Miners reduced to "proposers"; authority limited to choosing highest bidder block builders. With danksharding, no one aware of builders tx list. Once builder has been selected to manage a slot, it is their responsibility to process the entire block ... oracles to act as block builders ... primary motivation for design, according to the Eth team, to limit MEV, unfair controls that miners now have

https://news.coincu.com/113352-what-is-blockchain-danksharding/

>EIP-4844 will be part of The Surge upgrade ... could be implemented as soon as Shanghai hard fork, the first post-merge upgrade

https://ethdaily.substack.com/p/the-merge-surge-verge-purge-splurge

>Kain: L222 finally has some momentum ... with EIP-4844 done in reasonable timeframe we’ll be able to obliterate ... transaction costs.

https://mirror.xyz/kain.eth/wstTdM5tz1LqdupcKwBCJBJ-tHNtP-CAITf-ewJqRd0

>FSS ... an oracle network order the txs sent to a contract ... decouples ability to extract MEV from mining blocks

https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-fair-sequencing-services-enabling-a-provably-fair-defi-ecosystem

>VB: if you want, I imagine even Chainlink could do this

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/rwojtk/ama_we_are_the_efs_research_team_pt_7_07_january/

>arb nitro, merge + smartcon calendar, "tx lanes"?, why vb proposed maker oracles
u get it yet?

>>50979546
>u get it yet?

Kek no

>>50979356
Was this updated today?

>>50979638
Yes

>>50979660
Cool
Btw I don’t get your earlier post :p

>Tim Beiko is one of the most prominent figures in the Ethereum Foundation, with his work and Ethereum-related updates often being cited on the largest financial news outlets.
>He’s been working on Ethereum full-time since 2018, and worked at Joseph Lubin’s ConsenSys before switching over to the Ethereum Foundation in 2021.
>As one of the leaders who’s responsible for protocol upgrades and developer meetings, Tim is currently heavily involved in preparing for the Ethereum Merge, which is due to take place some time this summer (if everything goes as planned, of course!).
>By mid-2017, it was clear to me that even if all the current projects failed, there would likely always be demand for Ethereum. That’s when I started diving deeper.
>Because I wasn’t super comfortable going all in any of the specific projects at the time, I figured I’d try to contribute to the protocol directly. It took a while for me to find the perfect role, as I wasn’t an engineer or researcher, but in 2018 ConsenSys hired me to be the PM on their new mainnet client, Hyperledger Besu (Pantheon at the time). I got to go to Devcon Prague during my 2nd or 3rd week on the job, and have been immersed in Ethereum protocol development ever since!”
seems like the type of person they'd send to give vitalik distance
https://cryptostaker.com/tim-beiko-interview/
>>50979546
uniswap oracles

>>50979390
>>50979388
vitalik not needed

>>50979687
This all shows how Chainlink will take over the block building for ETH in the surge stage of its roadmap.

And that Chainlink will have dedicated gas free oracle lanes on all blockchains.

Is this Beiko guy actually significant? Also what does this mean for the link token price assuming this all comes to fruition? I recall anons stating arbitrum release with pump link but it did absolutely nothing.

>>50979728
kek

the guy is 67 and has $25b, there's no way he's becoming ceo
but yeah says a lot that this is the only project he's connected to

>>50979704
>uniswap oracles

>>50979824
Well it's good news for Chainlink, so I'd say about hmmm -6.57%? That's the best I can do sweetydiddums

>>50979824
like most chainlink stuff, the shills were right but a few years early
i don't think they were acting in bad faith but they thought that fss was coming with the arbitrum release when yeah, that clearly hasn't been the case

>>50979728
Lol

>>50979824
Seems like a big shot according to this>>50979704

Holy shit. It's all true. I know nothing ever happens, but I think it's actually happening this time.

>>50980150
All the marines really left 4chan link thread should be full knowing it’s finally our time

>>50979704
>uniswap oracles

>>50979356
Fucking finally. It made no sense at all, with everything going on with PBS, not to have a senior ETH speaker there. I was quietly hoping for a grand Vitalik reveal, but this is more reasonable considering Vitalik wouldn't be seen dead at a Chainlink event.
It just made no fucking sense for ETH not to be represented there at a high level. I can reduce my dosage of crazy pills now.

>>50980215
So was that larp about ETH heavily being reliant on LINK true then? That post seemed way too specific to be a simple larp. To the anons that don't know what I am talking about, there was a larp with a picture of Vitalik that basically stated that ETH was going to turn over it's major functionalities to link, resulting in link capturing the MEV marketshare.

>>50980298
Is this Tim guy a high level ETH guy though? Or is it just a friendly gesture?

>>50980324
He's an ETH core dev working on upgrades and the merge, see here:
>>50979704
He's exactly the right person to talk about EIP4844, PBS, the new block builder role, etc etc. The things that Chainlink look more and more likely to be instrumental in.

>no john wolpert
>no magic bus
>no brantly from ens to talk about ccip read
>no charles
>twenty different chainlink employees

>>50979388
>>50979390
That is the point you fucking retarded niggers

>>50980397
you didn't hear about brantly? he got cancelled

>>50980300
Tons of good info in anon's thread here if you want to deep dive
>>50979546

PBS, or "proposer builder separation" is the new Ethereum structure that is coming in in the first post-merge major update, so maybe in a year or so. The main gist of it is that it takes two different roles that are currently performed by one party in ETH (validators) and splits them so they are performed by two different parties.
The first job is building blocks, which means taking transactions and ordering them. This is where a huge amount of extractive MEV happens, which is a fancy way of saying, this is the part where ETH miners rip users off to the tune of millions and millions of dollars, by ordering and inserting their own transactions to their own benefit.

It's looking more and more likely that the block builder role will be performed by Chainlink DONs running Fair Sequencing Services, which is a provably fair way of ordering transactions. They then submit the already ordered blocks to Ethereum validators, who no longer have the power to fuck with transaction ordering behind the scenes.

This does amount to handing over a central functionality of Ethereum to Chainlink DONs. It is a core role and if Chainlink does take a massively dominant market share in block building then it essentially means that Ethereum is relying on Chainlink to survive (even moreso than it is now with its oracle dependencies).

The thing is, given how substantial and central this role would be to Ethereum under PBS, it made no sense not to have a senior ETH representative at SmartCon to talk about it. It was a glaring gap in the SmartCon lineup that has now been filled.

Disclaimer: There is as yet no concrete guarantee that Chainlink DONs will be block builders. This is still at the hardcore breadcrumbing stage.

>>50980563
ok, I'll bite. how did he get cancelled from SmartCon?

>>50979728
based

>>50980627
Not from SmartCon. He's back from a 6 month twitter ban and is being intentionally shut out of ENS. For "tolerance" of course, that's always a good reason to exclude people.

>>50980300
>>50980366
checked

>>50980660
huh ok, so does this mean that ccip read is cancelled too?

>>50980627
see here:
https://twitter.com/BrantlyMillegan/status/1560294584961437701
he literally got removed from the ens team
as for charles, i dunno if it would be bullish or bearish

Andrew Tate's $50000 Hustlers university got LEAKED.

https://d1scord.gg/8V2UdnmP (replace 1 with "i" to avoid spam)

Learn how to copywrite, make money, ecommerce, crypto, code, trade all for FREE LEAKED NOW..aaastdjd

>>50980733
no already done, nick johnson led it

>>50980563
This is one of the larps I mentioned earlier in the thread; however, there was one more that was even more recent and specific.

>>50980750
Charles at Smartcon would be magnificent for the memes alone

>>50980776
will Nick Johnson attend SmartCon to talk about ccip read?
it seems a more concrete crumb than chainlink might be doing something critical with Ethereum, who hate them

>>50980839
Ethereum is being hijacked by JPM who love Chainlink, get with the program
Vitalik is out and banks are in

>>50980839
>chainlink might be doing something critical with Ethereum
If this was not the case, why would ETH send one of there guys to a Chainlink event? This Tim character also seems to be one of the long time core developers, so he's not just some nobody.

Im pretty blackpilled on this smartcon frankly. I'd hoped to have had some big speakers by this point but aside from DTCC man it's frankly a load of crap.

>>50980231
YESSS!!!! duuuuuuuuude another infographic, woooooo this is EXACTLY what we needed.

>-12% on the week

Probably worth listening to for anyone that is paying close attention to all this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJaCaS0WbIw

>>50980880
believe it when i see it
>>50980914
>why would a crypto guy attend a chainlink event
best oracle network on eth maybe?

>>50980839
dunno but that guy is definitely a fan of chainlink
it's funny actually way back in 2018 he did some freelance work for chainlink and wrote about how good it was of them to open source it
we used to hold onto stuff like that

Also this thread from Tim himself:
https://twitter.com/TimBeiko/status/1560352205978288131
The first part about the merge is less interesting, but the response to Flashbots censoring relays further down the thread is very interesting.

that not Vitalik you donkey

>>50981153
yeah time flies when your a bagholder. what about john wolpert the magic bus memes were pretty good quality or that docusign guy

>>50980914
>why would ETH send one of there guys to a Chainlink event? This Tim character also seems to be one of the long time core developers, so he's not just some nobody.

He's not that important either. There have been hundreds of core developers, if not thousands. No one knows who he is nor cares.

Don't you just love it when stuff like this gets dropped and there's this period of silence from the fudders? You just know they're desperately fumbling about, trying to formulate an angle on it. These are the moments I love best. They're almost like the golden hour when the sun is going down and there's that magical light, except for fud.

>>50981301
He oversees the AllCoreDevs call.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJaCaS0WbIw
He's an extremely senior figure and very relevant to the PBS questions that relate to Chainlink.

>>50981191
https://twitter.com/TimBeiko/status/1560352646061383680
>After @dannyryan commented on the idea of CL teams removing their support for the Builder API. This would simply lead to a lot more forked clients (like mev-geth in PoW) and be a net negative: the mev market wouldn't change, but it would be run with less visible software
If he is talking about Chainlink (CL) here then that is very telling because he has been using the term so much it has become annoying to type out in full so out of habit he intentionally shortens it. It also means that he assumes people know who he is referring to

>>50981250
I remember lol, muh Microsoft

>>50981330
Couldn't have put it better myself. Those little multi-hour windows before the fudders coalesce and descend again. Wish we could have it like this all the time, but alas.

>>50981301
they've arrived! excellent! i think a better line would be to attack the fact that tim doesn't have a strong technical background

>>50981330
even in this thread you can already find some fumbling attempts though
trying to see what sticks, but you're right it is more clumsy

>>50981422
nick szabo follows midhav from that bulgarian apu2 project on twitter. kind of interesting he went dark last year but he had an interesting reaction to chainlink back in the day if i remember correctly he said no get this shit off my timeline

>>50981365
microsoft and their venture fund are attending though so thats something. expected john wolpert again

>>50980880
The only thing JPM loves is suppressing the price of their assets and market manipulation.

>thread dies because marketing wanted to push "big eth dev attends smartcon" angle and not have a genuine discussion
huh really makes you think

>>50981738
We already had the discussion. Almost completely undisturbed, too, it was great. Now you can spam post, waffle and derail with the other retards and it doesn't change the fact the top of the thread if a trove of good info.

why does vitalik actually hate chainlink
did sergey bully him at some point

>>50981737
yep and Chainlink will bring derivatives and big finance into crypto, allowing them to do just that
>he doesn't know about Liink

>>50981783
>his warlock main on WoW was stalked relentlessly by a mysterious orc shaman under the name of Sergor

>>50981769
who did you talk to and what did you discuss beyond "big eth dev attends smartcon" and so they should. Lots more to discuss beyond your orchestrated crumb hunt.
Its been years of noticeable and embarassing absences from the ETH team. Telling that they refuse to support certain projects using their blockchain. I noticed that Kyber have integrated Chainlink. Do you think Vitalik would still shill Kyber if they attended Smartcon?

Maybe Vitalik should attend SmartCon to discuss the new Kyber integration?

What about Nick Szabo? Do you think he has something to do with BTC dumping on Chainlink news? Interesting he follows an apu2 shill. OG bitcorner, he probably works with Jack on Web5 when he is not lurking here and dumping BTC to quell link pumps

>>50981769
What do you think about John Wolpert not attending but Yorke and Microsoft's VC fund attending?

CCIP read was discussed heaps on this board and it seems like really exciting tech. Why do you think no one from ENS is attending SmartCon?

Also what is the deal with so many Chainlink employees. Kind of weird not to expect most of the team to be there. Unless Chainlink want to rub it in our faces that they are spending huge money flying remote workers over to NY?

>>50981871
>what did you discuss beyond "big eth dev attends smartcon"
Nothing. That was the subject of the thread. That Beiko's presence answers a much anticipated question of "How can Chainlink be block building under PBS if ETH won't even send a representative to SmartCon". And now they are. And the representative is a core dev that deals with upgrades aka EIP4844 aka PBS. It's exactly the crumb that some of us have been waiting for.
Which makes attempts to derail by talking about completely irrelevant shit like Szabo or Kyber even more conspicuous and incoherent.

>>50981973
Kek. Well put. Nice little summary.

>>50981973
>Which makes attempts to derail by talking about completely irrelevant shit like Szabo or Kyber even more conspicuous and incoherent
but earlier you posted this rather official looking disclaimer
>>50980613
>Disclaimer: There is as yet no concrete guarantee that Chainlink DONs will be block builders. This is still at the hardcore breadcrumbing stage
so this is really a crumb thread and your refusal to discuss certain crumbs and not others is revealing of your agenda.

And I care more about who is behind BTC dumping because of chainlink news more than some maybe ETH will use Chainlink for blockbuilding because it directly relates to my financial interests in Chainlink

>>50981973
And Kyber was Vitalik's golden goose before Unislop was a thing newfag. Vitalik coming to SmartCon to discuss Kyber's CL integration would be hilarious and a serious kneebend

Your crumb structuring agenda reminds me of those hey (((frens))) let's all discuss the basilisk and when some anon tried to discuss something else as it relates to CL you guys would abandon the thread. inorganic as fuck you should just let the conversation flow and let people make up their own minds

>>50982025
This guy is obsessed with Chainlink kek. Wonder how much he holds? Bit of a dick though..

>>50980613
ETH protocol isn't going to rely on a shitcoin protocol that's on ethereum. They're going to build it as an oracle module part of eth clients
Holy fucking schizo on this board, I swear

>>50982093
Go fuck yourself you dumb nigger kike

>>50982025
>And I care more about who is behind BTC dumping because of chainlink news
kinda pathetic ngl
either Chainlink succeeds and then it doesn't matter
or chainlink fails and then, again, it doesn't matter
TA tier posting, fuck off lol, any serious investor would rather discuss news than muh big bad manipulation

If Btc could really suppress important revolutionary projects forever then it would have done so with ETH as well. No one cares about your temporary anxieties dude, just fuck off

>>50982093
>you are obsessed with CL
yes held for years followed every crumb hunt
>but your attitude bad
why because I suggested crumbs you are not authorized to discuss?

lets talk about bancor and celsius. hope to see them at smartcon. big ccip users!

>>50982116
So you're saying they're going to build something similar to Chainlink from scratch although they never mentioned having such intentions and despite already taking ages doing their many other items on the ETH roadmap just because they don't like Sergey for some reason despite Chainlink having shown its resiliency since it launched mainnet? Yeah that seems a lot more believable

>>50982219
All chainlink news has resulted in dumps for years except in a few cases of a pump then a latter retrace so your analysis is wrong
>eth is the only thing that matters!
chainlink ia blockchain agnostic newfag
>No one cares about your temporary anxieties dude, just fuck off
you do dont you dumb nigger. probably
you are still seething sir gay kicked you square in the axe wound by releasing the staking blogpost announcement early or seething about your bancor haircut or losing your tokens on celsius kek

>>50982247
why do you even entertain this baseless fud with a response but get angry at my questions about who is attending chainlink and who is dumping btc because of CL news?
Are you playing both sides of the debate with another IP?

Staying on topic and following specific crumbs is fundamentally important!

>>50981330
yeah I also love to dissect the /biz/ chainlink fudders metagames, browse /biz/ for years and this is all so obvious

>>50981050
token not needed

>>50980830
I will not watch smartcon until it is confirmed Charles Hoskinson is speaking

My thoughts are Nick Szabo and a few other OG Bitcorners have been working together with the MEV mafia and the bulgarians of nexo and apu2 with a few others to dump BTC to control LINK.
If the news of CL becoming block builders and Arbitrum validators is true then CL may have divided their enemy and destroyed the MEV mafia.

Straight outta sun tzu classic text the art of war and a definite path to victory but it does seem to present a defi web3 and a btc web5 division.
Kind of ill defined philosophically for my tastes but it seems to go back to which coin or token will become the referent unit of account for the entire space LINk or BTC.

I think all markets will become something/link rather than something/btc which is what the web5 nick and jack crowd seem to be counting on.

But these are schizo rambles outside the predefined crumb hunt designated itt kek. I remember back in the day I could speculate freely with other autists and enjoy the ride.

>>50982603
I see fundamentally a designated crumb hunt thread made by aggressive non-INTP Chainlink employees. Their purpose is to drill into our thick autistic skulls that CL are blockbuilders for ETH.

Who didnt know this after reading the Torgin.ETH paper on oracles? CL oracles are faster than anything else and fairer and more decentralized.

The other month I was range banned for discussing this in a mETH thread and asking about CL

Guys… we’re dumping the most again. What the actual fuck

>>50982307
Huh? This thread really has gone full schizo, I guess that's enough biz for the day

>>50982796
umm didnt you read the guy above BTC dumping because of LINK news like this thread is irrelevant. Also I seem to remember Bitboy spoke so some discord trannies back in the day when Apu2 was Chainlink Consultancy Group CLCG and they had a project called Honeycomb which was a complete trainrekt and CL ended up cutting off funding to them. Anyways BitBoy said they planned to dump LINk around Xmas time the resurrection.
inb4 various named groups in the walls schizo
This is how close the discord trannies are to the bulgarians and the OG bitcorner crowd. Delphi niggers probably did it for free BTC because they are immoral as fuck

>>50982874
>he thinks the non-schizos belong on /biz/
where do you think you are you dumb nigger

>>50982796
News such as an Eth core developer attending a conference organized by chainlink as we get closer to the eth merge definitely pissed a couple people off. The war games over the next month and some change are going to be incredible. The only way ethereum is legitimized as a settlement layer is if they eliminate MEV.

>>50982943
Dumps like this are fundamentally irrelevant stick to the designated crumb hunt people do not deviate your mind from the information presented
Simply nod and agree this maybe is bullish and not like the others

>>50981342
Kek it means consensus layer

>>50982943
The great irony of the whole thing is that if ETH remains a little extractive MEV playground then it never gets institutional adoption, or even global legitimacy.
Chainlink is literally saving them from themselves, but they have to be dragged kicking and screaming, because the short term profits from theft are so juicy.

>>50979356
Vitalik has effectively been bullied out of leadership in Ethereum.
One day the story will be told i guess. Perhaps it will be titled Flashboys 2.0

>>50983158
At the end of the day it means one senior eth dev thinks CL are maybe a good solution. great start potentially bullish but chainlink have had many promising developments turn to rot before my eyes.

More pressing for me is to game the web3 now united CL-ETH and various other blockchain projects vs web5 btc maxies, jack and whoever else
remember when there was a push from (((twitter marines))) to go on to twitter because thats where the good conversation is? know who had exec level access to every twitter conversation? guess who left twitter to join web5?
I dont think they were behind it at the beginning but they got behind the push because their egos inflated their importance.
Google records everything we type on Gboard. Twitter knows your every private message. Do you think Big Data can make trades better than someone like the house speaker?
Come to think of it I did not see Allen Day listed for SmartCon. Maybe Big Data will side with Web5?

>>50981342
>if CL = Chainlink
I’m convinced he’s doing this to be half secretive, see pic related
But at other times he reference the”cl team”

You guys have this wrong. Tim Beiko is MEV Mafia. He is not associated with Chainlink.
Vitalik is willing to bend the knee to chainlink now because he finally realized he got swindled by these fucks. But vitalik isn't in the drivers seat anymore.
Don't get duped

>>50983423

>>50983484
>Execution Layer/Consensus Layer

>>50983632
>>50983423
>CL = Consensus Layer
kek so this entire crumb thread was to trick anons. Nice that he is appearing and maybe he will delve into the meaning as it relates to Chainlink but beyond that who cares. And who the fuck is going to use ETH after the MEV mafia ruined shitcoins for everyone?

I am not bullish for the next animal coin nft run fuck off seriously

>>50983632
Ah, thanks

>>50979913
Any coin better than chainlink and ethereum?

https://github.com/ethereum/builder-specs
>latest release is called Dead Man's Switch
>references slashing
>divides validator into block proposing and block building
>respective repositories: mev rs and mev boost
not sure what to what of this... mev boost sounds like they want to increase it. dead mans switch sounds like it was a hidden option prepared by the eth team for this situation as a response to something but the talk about slashing and block building could be promising.
CL consensus layer refers to consensus layer teams / clients not chainlink

Thank you for using Government-approved blockchains and protocols only. Once CBDC is available you will once again be a fully compliant citizen in the international banking system.

>>50984612
reminder that btc and eth are both approved assets for unlimited investment. Chainlink is restricted to 30k per year

>>50984266
There's nothing better than chainlink and ethereum when it comes to technical performance. Eth Merge is coming, and I'm getting ready. I've got my eth staked on Freeway. The link target is $50.

>>50981504
That’s because the person was shilling DAG constellation to him.

>>50984675
What in the world is this?

>>50985113
just new fud, some proposed legislation in canada or some shit limiting how much the cucks up there can purchase at once.

>>50985113
canada legislation
>>50985168
its only fud against assets approved for unlimited goyim investment. the fact that a globohomo hotbed like Canada wants to restrict you from investing in LINK is bullish for LINK

>>50984680
What is your exit point for eth?

>>50979422
Based

>>50984680
I have huge expectations for the merge anon. I'm watching platforms that bridge web2 to web3 too as they would take crypto to the next level.

>>50985168
not fud, it's legit and already implemented. This is from one of the most popular crypto exchanges in canada (newton), I'm from BC and unaffected but who knows how long that lasts

>>50986007
fuck sorry man, canadian gov sounds so fucking gay

>>50986231
Imagine being forced into buying Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash by the government lmao. Did the politicians buy in 2017 and they're trying to unload bags or something?

>>50985639
I'm in for long term bets and I'm not going to sell my eth until it reaches $10K and it will remain on Freeway as I also trust the platform. Its liquidity is enough to deliver long-term rewards.
>>50985715
What do you mean anon?

>>50986782
Why would you ever choose to keep that much money on an exchange when you have the option to keep it in your possession? I don't understand the risk/reward.

If the asset you and everyone else is holding on exchanges really does a 5x in a week or two, do you really expect the exchange to have enough funds to cash everyone out at any given time, assuming they're not pretty close to fully backed in ETH terms?

Why not just hold privately and transfer to an exchange if/when you want to? Why would you want to just hope that your individual exchange will have the liquidity for you when the time comes, even when you know they can halt withdraws at will? Is that massive, uninsurable risk really worth the 2 or 3% you're getting in yield you know isn't even real?

I don't get it, do you just not understand the utility of the tech you've investing thousands into? Why would you exchange your nation's currency for it it if you don't understand what it really allows for at a basic level?

>>50986987
Won’t staking be the same thing?
You’ll be locking your asset up for a set amount of time in exchange for a few percent annually?

I don’t know how Chainlink staking is going to be more trustworthy than say Gemini.
Gemini makes money when their customers are profitable enough to trade regularly.
Chainlink obviously doesn’t give a shit about the people holding Link tokens.
They treat us like goy cattle human ATM machines, and it’s getting fucking irritating to see them waste time with stupid shit like conferences for fat women and ugly niggers.

>>50979356
What the hell is Ethereum

>>50981840
there is zero chance vitalik didnt play a gay as fuck undead male warlock. he basically walks like them!

>>50987419
>I don’t know how Chainlink staking is going to be more trustworthy than say Gemini.
go back and never come here again

>>50979356
QRD? Why is it the fault of the jews this time around? I already know it IS their fault though.

>>50987600
It’s okay to not understand. Some people don’t understand networks or a network of networks.

>>50980300
It's bullshit, Ethereum will never rely on a third party protocol to assume a core functionality.
We got the same hopium with arbitrum validators and it all was a nothing burger.
The current hopium is so bad it makes me legit angry.
We need staking for price feeds and CCIP already for this shit to move and the latter better absolutely dominate cross chain messaging.

>>50987919
Go read the white paper you dipshit.

AND IT'S DOOMPING
SERGEEEEEEYYYYYYYYY

>>50985217
>>50986007
Buy Btc change it to Link
Problem?