/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50952561
The problem with GameFi is that they focus too much on the money aspect and too little on the fun.

>>50953291
That is true, exactly why I said traditional games are still doing better

>>50953330
Of course there should be the earning aspect, but maybe in a more subtle way without hindering the actual fun and competitiveness of the game

>>50952561
Most alts are down, BTC is still around the 23k mark and there are only few projects pumping. This is time to DCA, HODL, Stake and to allow projects with actual utility to keep building

>>50953471
Precisely what I said. A bear market is a builder's market afterall, like someone wise said

>>50953291
This isn't all that true for every project. There have been good ones like GALA, SAND, MANA and according to a CRO report it's going to be a growing market.

>>50953413
What do you mean by subtle way, pajeet. You either play to earn or you don't. yes, it can be more fun though,

>>50953497
Who said that

>>50953551
What report was this, anon. It definitely is a growing market but needs a lot of change.


I'll be honest, I can't remember who the fuck said that. Saw it on some crypto telegram group. Kek

>>50953641
I think it was a crypto.com report about the total market cap of GameFi being 55.38 billion USD dollars in Feb of this year and is expected to grow 10 times more than traditional gaming by 2025

>>50953291
The main shits about their products is the business models aren't even sustainable
>>50953330
At least I've a personal love to my old Mario than Splinterlands

>>50953413
Practically all available GameFi products aren't close to old time games

>>50953471
I would be super careful with anything to HODL or STAKE. lots of rugs
>>50953716
I think this is overblown

>>50953718
Old mario over any of this shit. GTA, NFS. They dont make them like that anymore.


>>50953822
True.

>>50953716
Let's hope something good actually comes out of it so we can enjoy games instead of constantly focusing on actively earning

>>50953878
agreed, better to stick with projects that survived the previous bear.

as for the report, I skimmed it too, does seem too extreme but I have been seeing projects with other use cases from way back in 2018 now entering GameFi, so provided the trend continues, it may be true

>>50954042
Old projects, yes. BTC, ETH, AVAX, OCEAN, LINK, MATIC etc.

Everyone seems to be entering GameFi. Which 2018 project though

>>50954122
When is the LINK staking coming, kek. Been forever

>>50954122
GameFi projects are increasing. I can't say which project from 2018 recently entered, but this is a big win for the team.

>>50954149
Got into this shit because of one of their partnerships, what a fucking mistake.
>>50954122
The avalanche and polygon networks are great.

https://moonions.lol/thepath

anyone know the password?

>>50954122
I recently saw a write-up about Allianceblock getting into GameFi. Although I don't know if it's been there since 2018 pajeet.

>>50954312
Most likely them. They were built during the 2018 bear

>>50954257
Agreed. Let's hope the ethereum network is better in terms of gas after their merge too


>>50954312
>>50954403
Shouldn't they stick to their actual use cases and just bridge DeFi and TradFi, kek.

>>50954403
That's indeed a very long time. Survived the almighty 2018 bear and now planning on building on GameFi space. That's a masterclass in the space.

>>50954446
I think diversification is one of the spice of investment. Expanding above DeFi, TradFi is welcome.

>>50954600
Getting GameFi on board alongside DeFi and TradFi would be interesting. Let's watch how it plays out.

>>50953291
They seldom forget that i am playing the game solely for fun and not for the fucking peanuts they are offering.

>>50954684
Creating an avenue for them to be able to focus on developing their ecosystems by leveraging on third parties while they focus solely of building the product would be perfect.

>>50954446
> Shouldn't they stick to their actual use cases and just bridge DeFi and TradFi, kek.

How does it sound if i said you should stick to breaking alone and forget about walking, dumb ehn? That's how you sound retard they have all this products functioning together to create the perfect DeFi ecosystem

>>50953330
The money isn't bad, but if they take some time to build something thats interesting and fun to engage, then we can talk of the money again, cause this way they bring in relevance.

>>50953551
Good ones of course, but again how are they fairing in this market?
it's similar with most DeFi projects, if only they can focus on adding value, they'd have people engage them even in a dying market.

>>50954312
They not getting into GameFi, they only allowing GameFi projects to launch LM campaign using their Defi Terminal solution, this way they can make the games more interesting as players will be able to stake certain tokens to earn an in-game kind of token which will grant them access to some special features like better weapons, new modes/levels, etc.

>>50955862
I agree with you on this. They would offer the GameFi projects their DeFi terminal campaign so they can utilize it and focus on building their product.

>>50956468
That is true. This is why I like the idea of Fundrs and the upcoming TIDV. Revolutionary.

>>50956678
The idea is a very innovative and creative one that would enable GameFi project more interesting as the DeFi terminal solution would make it more enticing to users.

>>50956230
There's a need for the DeFi ecosystem to be balanced and interwoven. So I like the idea of GameFi projects leveraging on the liquidity mining campaigns.

>>50956859
This would be a win-win for both projects,GameFi projects should be flocking around the ecosystem right now.

>>50957392
This is definitely right. Has any GameFi project started leveraging on the DeFi terminal?

>>50958381
Currently, there's none, but I think it's only a matter of time before they understand how much they need the DeFi terminal.

>>50952561
It's quite commendable to see projects building regardless of what the overview of the market, they have shown they are about delivering quality utilities.

>>50958974
The DeFi terminal is a unique one that existing project utilizing keeps on returning to renew their staking. GameFi projects would definitely love it

>>50959335
Yes. Projects building useable products that would be beneficial for the the DeFi s and the traditional space is one to keep an eye on.

>>50956949
I like the Fundrs platform bmajorly because it's fully decentralized and participatory amongst other funding platform.

>>50953916
Imagine, MArio coming onstream into Gamefi, its gonna be a banger.. WTF

>>50956678
How is this even possible?
would the game developers have this feauture embedded? is it some SDk kinda stuff or something

>>50960527
Imagine Mario game utilizing the DeFi terminal campaign to make it more lucrative for gamers/Users?

>>50960294
I learnt Bonq and Dua token are set to Launch on the Fundrs soon. This is correct right?

>>50960996
That would be insane LMFAO to Alliance block ecosystem. Would add FIFA & PES, deff gonna be replacing the shitty Axies we all playing

>>50961077
Yes. That's correct. It will happen when the TIDV(KYC) goes live. The TIDV help one have control of what information they are willing to share.

>>50961077
Any date released yet? or still just rumour?

>>50961339
How/s that gonna play out in DeFi?
another kek idea

>>50961339
This right here is a proper advancement in the DeFi niche, this would gjve traditional instituton access into the decentralised marketplace

>>50960996
How would they do it? What's that even...

>>50956949
Fundrs is a whole big idea to the space, I mean startups will access funds and expertise needed to provided the required products for the space.
There will be no excuse for poor products.

>>50963281
They can launch a staking campaign where using Allianceblock DeFi terminal and an in-game token will be earned and used for opening new levels and buying more energy, this will make the gaming experience interesting to relate with.

>>50964673
might not be interesting to me, though it's a smart move by the project.