/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50899107
>MUH GME TO M00n!

>>50899107
Anon, it's over...Seriously. It's time to move on with your life.

Sept 28th is the day stinkies fill /biz/ with pink. Nothing will be announced, just like the first two

>>50899107
I had a sad realisation when we were at the bottom. LINK had dropped literally 90%, you would think the fudders would be absolutely euphoric, but they were still completely miserable. Calling for $3, seething at LINKies, consumed with rage.
It made me realise that the fudders will truly never make it. If a 90% drop on the project you're fudding doesn't make you happy, then nothing will.
LINKies on the other hand get absolutely euphoric at every 5% pump, even after dumping 90%. Streams of posts about how happy we are, all being in it together, memes, discussion, breadcrumbs, it's such a positive energy even when things are generally bad.
When you look at it this way you realise the LINKies have won already, maybe won from the very start. Because they're the happy ones, while contrarian, seething fudders just rage non-stop and never know peace.

>>50899107

Bitch, i got dogbat

>>50899139
maybe the lambos were the frens we made along the way

>>50899107
Chainlink needs a market cap larger than ethereum to reach 1k. Last time I checked, last week, the price of link at the then current Eth mc was about $400. $1k is a long way off.

>>50899244
Not when circulating supply is 100MM at most

>>50899244
>Thinks ethereum's market cap will remain constant as link pumps to $1k.
Yeah, no. As link does its 100x towards $1k ($1T mkt cap), ethereum will probably do a 10-20x ($2.5 - $5T mkt cap).

>>50899300
We only need 100B mcap after a (few) year(s) of staking being out due to tokens locked away in staking contracts >>50899265

>>50899300
I didn’t say that, which I tried to convey by saying it was just a recent price. I still think it will take a long time for link to break 1k

>>50899300
Fucking kek. Link never hits $25 again. It’s a dead shitcoin like SIA or ARK. You people will be here in another 5 years praying for $10

>>50899200
Checked an I laughed a little too hard at that.

>>50899200
all my friends are Anons

>>50899107
No we won’t

>>50899107
>This will hit 1k

Meds right now

>>50899419
That is literally the most bullish chart I have ever seen.
>bottom: found
>higher lows: locked in
>hopium: insane levels
>spring status: coiled tight af
How could any human being on the planet look at that and not just go all-in instantly?

>>50899139
You haven't figured out that most of the Fud is coming from disgruntled holders?

>>50899444
Checked. They're gonna get grunted af pretty soon.

>>50899419
>doesnt know this a fractal accumulation pattern

>>50899346
I sold my LINK to stables 4 months ago. I splitted the money into and bagged RIDE and EGLD.
I feel like a real genius, I can't believe that this Link faggots are so delusional

>>50899107
top signal loud and clear

>>50899518
>top signal loud and clear

>>50899107
Why is the token needed though?

>>50899623
The token solves the midwit problem.

40 year old linkmarine reporting.

>>50899505
holy vishnu, congrats on this seriously.

I have also bought Chainlink token again. It is a very good useful token. We will all go onto the moon. WAGMI new friends

>>50899244
absolute classic 2015 retard fud. nice one, really

I am marine

>>50899107
99% of /biz/ holds link

>>50899114
>>50899119
>>50899130
>>50899140
>>50899244
>>50899300
>>50899346
>>50899419
>>50899505
>>50899518
>>50899623
>>50899631
>>50899662

if youre nonwhite, uncircumcised and holding LINK then YGMI

>>50900096
... are slavs white?

>>50899107
>99% of biz didn't already take profits and leave a moonbag
>I'm n-not the r-retard... y-you guys are gonna r-rope!!
You should ask your bags how the weather is up there xDDD

>>50899725
>>50899139

It's true, 99% of /biz/ holds LINK and 90% of them are fudding it, and are extremely miserable.
That's what your "hazing" achieved. You mindfucked your fellow autists into madness. They are like dogs that have been chained in a basement for half a decade, beaten by the hand that feeds them. Whoever came up with it better take a good look at the board and ask themselves if they might have gone a bit too far.

t. bought in early 2018, never fudposted ONCE.

>>50899107
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>50900643
>You mindfucked your fellow autists into madness.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWl6boRgtRs

I ran the math.
If you had bought 1000usd worth in 2021 and sold at about the top you would have made x82 times on a shitcoin
With LINK you would have made x4 at best.
Your "technology" is outperformed by a dogcoin, shitter.

>>50900731
Can you stake your dog coin you degenerate gambling faggot?

>>50900774
No. And you can't stake Link either

>>50900784