/biz/ - Business & Finance

token not needed

>>50855393
Imagine how grim it’s going to be after than post conference dump

>>50855393
Eric Schmidt would not be an advisor if this project wasn’t going to be extremely profitable. Link is in stealth mode right now just like Google was in the early 2000s. They are keeping it secret for as long as possible as to gain a monopoly before the money printers get turned on.

>heard that vitalik's new book about eth is incoming
>go on amazon
>sales begin on the 27th of september
linkbros...

>>50855551
bump
this is a good breadcrumb

>>50855393
Maybe the token not needed fud has a point. This is not how normal investments behave if it’s actually profitable product. I think biz just overestimated the necessity of oracles and no one is actually using them. I’m starting to doubt my investments. I’ll probably trade my last link stacks for Eth Merge. That’s where all the hype is currently. There’s no way staking will pump the price. We don’t even know when the release date is ffsz

Where’s the Hannover guy?

>>50855544
He’s just an advisor bro. There’s no stealth mode or hiding strategy or anything lmao. They announced every single partnerships and development on Twitter. There are no secrets.

>>50855544
>stealth mode right now just like Google was in the early 2000s.
lol what. everyone and their grandma was using google in the early 2000's. you have to be 18 to post here

>>50855946
He is talking about ad rev retard

>>50856025
i dont do computer shit bro dont give a fuck about terminology or whatever

>>50856037
Advertisement revenue isn’t computer terminology wtf how are you this retarded?

>the year is 2030
>your wife wakes you up in the middle of the night
honey, the linkstimates are going up!!

>>50855393
We are the LINK marines, and we are /pol/. We DESPISE niggers, kikes, faggots, spics, chinks, gooks, troons, and most of all jannies. Fortune and great wealth will come to you, but only if you post "niggers, jews...BAD NEWS!" in this thread.

$1488 EOY

>>50855544
Cope, this has been debunked

>>50855406
its collateral

>>50855866
I concur anon, let's both do the right thing and swap for ETH

>>50856329
Chainlink doesn’t even have a working product

>>50856482
pathetic

>>50856245
really? explain then

>>50855393
People aren’t smart, bro.

>>50856523
What can I do with the token?

>>50856037
>i dont do computer shit bro dont give a fuck about terminology or whatever
Based retard

>>50856709
Same thing you've been able to do since May 30, 2019: pay for Chainlink services.

>>50856547
Just because people post a bunch of google/Amazon analogies doesn't make them true. And there are a ton of other useless projects that also have such "advisors" working for them. I believe XRP had a bunch of these former SEC/government people on their team which was endlessly hyped for many years. And we can all see where that went.

>>50856796
>And we can all see where that went.
Yes: Ripple pumped to outer heaven and is still rank 6 to this day despite being under an SEC lawsuit for nearly two years.

>>50855911
> they announced all the partnerships
i actually know for a fact they haven't
.t under NDA....

>>50856796
This
Link is a great project on paper. But reality doesn’t reflect that apparently
>>50856770
Chainlink doesn’t have staking yet.

>>50856841
>Chainlink doesn’t have staking yet.
That has nothing to do with the fact that every single thing Chainlink mainnet has ever done costs Link tokens.

>>50855393
Schmidt - may be ok, we really know fuck all about what he's doing

Yorke E. Cunt - absolute faggot who turns up year after year with nothing to say

Swiftman - Didn't say anything at all last year, so bit ambivalent

Homan Farahmand - VP analyst isn't much of a title

DTCC - probably the only one worth tuning in for but i highly suspect it will be like the swift talk last year. Vague claims about the future economy but no substance.

>>50856037
based tard poster

>>50856855
Wrong
It just means it’s still in glorified testnet.
>>50856832
Xrp never went back to its ath retard

>>50856859
>elbows too pointy, so a bit ambivalent

>>50856919
>secures dozens of billions
>"glorified testnet"

trying too hard

>>50856837
Actually take your meds
>>50856948
>secures billions
Bro, that means jack fucking shit if it doesn’t reflect the price

>>50856859
I hate that yorke guy. Never brings anything of value

>>50856983
Amazon was doing lots of things that weren't reflected in the price of its stock either in the early years.

>>50856994
>muh Amazon
This is the most retarded analogy that was ever used to compare chainlink. First of all, stock =/= crypto. And second, Amazon has actual users, like paying customers. Bezos didn’t have to subsidize these users. And third, I’m not waiting some 30 fucking years just so I can have some decent return on crypto lmao.

>>50856832
Just like LINK pumped from 0.20 to $53, but its days are over. The only difference being that LINK isn't a complete scam unlike XRP. However that still doesn't make the token needed or a good investment.

>>50857103
>And third, I’m not waiting some 30 fucking years just so I can have some decent return on crypto
So don't.

>>50857121
>Just like
Holy shit no

>>50856948
The majority of the value it secures is just defi scams. I'm sure a lot of it just involves wash trading the same shit over and over again.

>>50857161
>Link bad because crypto bad
Are you sure you want to be here?

>>50855878
Probably in germany

>>50856989
This, I am so sick of this retard showing up every fucking year talking vague hypotheticals and last year about gaming. It's such a waste of time

Anyone remember Fidelity guy talking about BTC mining? Or Wolpert talking about the weather? Now that they're charging money for these talks, a repeat of last year becomes criminal

>>50857281
It's almost like you've never seen or heard any crypto conferences (BTC, ETH, ...) ever before in your life.
Or any conferences at all for that matter.
They always talk about general and random stuff.

>>50857178
Bitcoin is great, but yes 90% of crypto is bad. The only reason ETH is also a great investment is because it's actually used heavily whenever there's a bull run, and there's normie hype. But LINK has no normie hype, it will never have normie hype, and its pitiful fee revenue will never be enough to prop up the token price by itself. Hell, all the keeper nodes make under 100 LINK a day altogether, and that's a drop in an ocean compared to LINK's 1bil supply.

>>50857310
One small difference is that those conferences actually made the price go up.

>>50855544
In such stealth mode that they haven't made a single $.

>>50856994
Amazon after 5 years - $2.7 BILLION in sales
Chainlink - One big mac tweet

>>50857331
>Link is used by defi
>"Defi is a scam"

>ETH is used by defi
>"ETH is actually used heavily"

Listen to yourself.

>>50857416
>decentralized protocol
>sales
pick one

>>50856037
holy fucking BASED
stinkmarines utterly btfo. no copium can recover from this

>>50857438
ETH has normie hype. Without normie hype, it would be sitting at $100.

>>50857473
>ETH has normie hype
lol

>>50857438
>>decentralized protocol
>>sales
>pick one
What the fuck is the point of holding link then? Lmao

>>50857310
Strawman, how hard was that reach? BTC and ETH conferences don't advertise "Fidelity, Oracle and SWIFT" coming to their conferences to dupe people into thinking there are partnerships. Sergey has always made it seem like they had institutional partnerships (original diagrams) and the further we get from ICO, the more we see it oversold and underdelivered

>>50857438
eth is decentralized fuel for trustless smart contract execution
link is centralized app currency for centralized oracle aggregator
you guys are literally jerking off over muh partnerships and muh famous names rather than the intrinsic value of the system, and you don't see any problem with it. lmao

>>50857490
What are you even trying to say?

>>50857500
What does BTC "sell"?

>>50857502
>BTC and ETH conferences don't advertise "Fidelity, Oracle and SWIFT" coming to their conferences to dupe people into thinking there are partnerships
BTC and ETH conferences advertise literally all of their speakers lol

>>50857510
>intrinsic value
What do you even mean?
ETH worked just as well when it was sub-$1 as it does now. Arguably better.

>>50857558
Every normie alive knows AP.

Duuuuuuude the AP news partnership!!!!

>-2%

>>50857566
>Every normie alive knows AP.
And yet we are still at single digits.

>>50857490
Normies are not buying Chainlink. Your screenshot doesn't mean what you think it means.

>>50855788
Checked. A good breadcrumb for what?

>>50857581
>>50857613
>>50857696
Pic is Chainlink immediately after the AP partnership was announced.
Guess what happened the very next minute after the last candle in pic.

>>50856837
You’re under an NDA with Chainlink?

>>50857416
Amazon didn't have a small group subsidizing their services to make it free for all. Chainlink did. That's why pricefeeds, the most integrated functionality of all of crypto, is free.

>>50857502
> BTC and ETH conferences don't advertise "Fidelity, Oracle and SWIFT" coming to their conferences
They sure as fuck would if Fidelity, Oracle , and Swift were actually coming.
Fucking retard lol

>>50857732
>muh btc being a meanie and dumping on link!
Kek right on cue.

>>50856859
This is the most realistic perspective to take. Every big corporations discussions literally can be summarized as

>the future is exciting!
>imagine the possibilities
>we are very interested

I still never see any tangible use cases for any of this tech beyond the DeFi and NFT bull shit. It was the same in 2017. So we need to wait for an entire legal system overhaul to happen for real world use cases beyond trading imaginary assets.

>>50857732
Confirmation bias. There are probably hundreds of other shitcoins that this standard could apply to. Not gonna sift through all of them like a schizo though to find some association like that.

>>50857817
Well that's literally the reason Link didn't continue pumping.

>>50857821
>>the future is exciting!
>>imagine the possibilities
>>we are very interested
You know what's worse about this? Even the speakers seem doubtful themselves lmao

>>50857850
>Confirmation bias.
What?
Bitcoin literally dumped the very minute after that last Link candle.
That's literally what happened.

>>50857858
>Well that's literally the reason Link didn't continue pumping.
Who care's about the reason? At the end of the day, it didn't pump. It's like watching trumptards arguing how Bidet stole the election, but he's still president.

>>50857906
>Who care's about the reason?

oh lawd

>>50856948
The “dozens of billions” secured is based entirely on nothing though. It is just more fiat. None of that value is based on real world stuff. It is:

Wow! Retards are paying 10 cents for Doge coins! I have a defi contract that pays me interest on Avax wrapped Doge at 10%, so I have $1,000,000 of “value.”

None of this value is based on anything in the real world except for retards’ willingness to trade their money for digital tokens.

There are NO value-adding applications using any public blockchains and very few using things like hyper ledger.

I’m not saying that the tokens won’t go up in value based on people hyping up utility, but let’s stop pretending any of this value actually currently exists in the real world.

>>50857946
>The “dozens of billions” secured is based entirely on nothing though.
Then the same applies to all of defi and crypto.

>>50857929
What's so funny?
>>50857969
uhh, yes?

>>50858003
>uhh, yes?
So Link bad because crypto bad.
Great insight to make on a crypto board lel

>>50857868
Because the speakers understand the massive undertaking required to make any of this shit useful in the real world. And most people “involved in the space” want to get rich quick off shitcoins, not consider that there are decades old laws in place at every government level that need to be rewritten to enable any of this shit, corporate policies that need to get revised, etc etc.

When you consider the actual scope of all of this, it is going to take many years before even the simplest real world use cases go live.

It’s like we have a car now…but we have no roads, no oil infrastructure to mine and distribute gasoline, etc. so you can have fun driving around in a flat field until you run out of gas but you need to wait for the roads, the gas refineries and gas stations, traffic lights, parking lot space, etc etc

>>50855551
One day after Shemitah

>>50857969
Exactly my point. All very tenuous.

>>50857709
> asking someone on this retard forum to explain their vague, cryptic assertion
first day here, eh?

>>50855393
>how obvious does it have to be before people start to realize
That's what I thought on 9/11

>>50858069
You're the third poster itt to argue that "Link bad because crypto bad".

>>50857814
You're right they didn't need fake partnerships for their value to skyrocket

this entire thread is pic related kek. good work boys

>>50858184
Pic is the EEA announcement roster from early 2017.
How many of these are using ETH?
Would you call all of these fake partnerships?

Meanwhile all Chainlink is doing is announcing speakers.

>>50858211
also whenever that image gets posted in a link thread, it promptly stops getting bumped. like you're now seeing.

>>50858240
Post merge, all of them

>>50858003
>What's so funny?
you are. every post in this thread you say something stupid

>>50858389
>Post staking, all of them

>>50855544
debunked, sir

>>50858427
you're coping and it shows

>>50858427
>>50858465
>>50858487

>>50858642
is this part of the "hiding strategy"

>Link is the next google...because it JUST IS ALRIGHT

>>50858673

this was such an organic, active thread. where'd everyone go?

>>50855866
>>50855911
>>50856087
>>50856482
>>50856709
>>50856832
>>50856841
>>50856919
>>50856983
>>50857103
>>50857333
>>50857500
>>50857558
>>50857613
>>50857817
>>50857868
>>50857906
>>50858003
>17 pbtid
you're going to have to post at least 50 more times in this thread, and make a few dozen more new fud threads before i will consider selling you a single chainlink token for the price of $81000 united states dollars

this was such an organic, active thread. where'd everyone go?

>>50855551
What the actual fuck is about to happen

>>50859021
I left because I have shit to do other than argue on 4chud. I can literally do nothing to escape the shill narrative - if I leave then I've "suddenly left the thread after being BTFO", and if I stay then you'll say "why are you so invested in a project you don't own bro??". There is no winning with you people. Later, loser.

>>50856796
Who do you think has more money: Eric Schmidt or some random suit from the SEC? Of course the suit had a nice job and a good income but I doubt he was a billionaire. Eric has no incentive to do anything that isn’t going to be radically transformative for society and make him a fuckton of money.

>>50856245
>>50856796
>>50857121
>>50857161
>>50857331
>>50857473
>>50857696
>>50857850
>>50859095
>I have shit to do other than argue on 4chud
>9 pbtid about a token he doesn't hold
see
>>50859061

>>50857103
Actually this comparison makes a lot of sense. Just like “books” were the Trojan horse that jump started Amazon, “price feeds” are the Trojan horse that’s jumpstarting Chainlink labs.

>>50858240
“Enterprise abstraction layer”

>>50859095
>I have shit to do other than argue on 4chud.
and yet here you are kek

Holy shit this is going to be another thread with several 30+ pbtid of pure seething trannies isn't it. You are fucking mentally damaged. Absolutely mind broken.

>>50855393
0 based coders, all middle managers that won't do shit for you

>>50855544
>pay millions USD to have a globohomo "advisor" who don't know shit about what you are trying to accomplish, simply here for the free bux
>he just act as a mannequin but for autists, like Channel would hire Angelina Jolie or whatever
>this is somehow bullish
ok..

>>50855551
I refuse to let this thread be derailed by seething fudders. Smartcon starts literally the day after Vitalik's book about proof of stake becomes available. Smartcon's date was changed so that it was after the merge.

THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT.

>>50859575
Pretty good stuff anon, going to buy money skelly's book actually, the date is no coincidence I think.

>>50859575
>Smartcon's date was changed so that it was after the merge
I have seen multiple anons post this, why is this significant?

>>50859667
We know staking/CCIP are coming this year. A lot of Chainlink features have taken forever, we have been waiting and waiting and a lot of people suspect one of the reasons is that Ethereum's roadmap for proof of stake and becoming scalable kept getting pushed back. Basically Ethereum has been hampering LINK's progress, but if we finally get the merge and it is successful they can start releasing features which would benefit from it. Having smartcon right after the merge is a sign that they want the merge to be successful first before doing anything. If it had no relevance, why not just have smartcon much earlier like usual?

Links fags will be BTFO by the GameStop Marketplace

DTCC will lose.

>>50859575
just reported you to the "people coordinator" at chainlink labs HR. Expect a call soon

Prosperi returns from Smartcon back to DTCC offices:

>Boss: There he is, Steve-ooo!!! Our little wolf of blockchain
>Prosperi: I've got some great new developments in the space to ta..
>Boss: That's great buddy (checks watch), but I gotta run to a meeting. Say, now that you're in back in the office, could you make a coffee run for us? Thanks big guy

>>50859415
If you rewrote this in English it would be pretty compelling.,

are +20k linklets making it in the next 12 months?

>>50860645
God i hope so

>>50860645
1k linklets are making it in the next 12 months sir

>>50859081
>What the actual fuck is about to happen
A lot.

>>50859081
Given the past probably nothing

I thought we had broken the trend from BTC guys? Out of the entire top 100, nothing is down more than LInk. Jesus CHRIST. In before:

>just sell

I'm trying to. Just need one last scam exit pump on the "staking" announcement. In quotes obviously because the real feature won't be released for years. I may be sick of this investment but I ain't gonna sell the bottom. Almost there...

Can someone tell me why, if Link is to be chain agnostic with ccip and so doesn't really need the Eth network, we have had to wait for Eth to go PoS?
I've not heard this answered in any way, really

>>50861563
everything plugs into ETH L1, which is about to fork

>>50861563
Ethereum is so far ahead in terms of developers and network effect that even with Chainlink being able to integrate with other chains already it still makes sense to just wait for the merge. It's more of a statement of how infantile the smart contract space is still. Chainlink has been the driving force behind everything.

>>50861563
>he doesn't know

I bought at 13 cents and have never sold. I could care less if it never goes up, I've still made money. But, it's going to.

>>50856216
checked

>>50861889
Fuck you
Whoever you are
Whatever you’re doing here
Fuck you

>>50861398
It’s nothing until it isn’t
I believe in the god candle now more than at any time in the past

>>50858037
>no roads, no oil infrastructure
Could you try harder? Link is the infrastructure.

>>50862182
Niggers, jews...BAD NEWS

>>50858037
I think things will be a lot smoother than you might suspect
Chainlink is the future, the rest of the world just doesn’t see it yet
https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/recode/23001543/eric-schmidt-white-house-office-science-technology-policy-philanthropy-ethical-concerns

>>50856037
based low IQ who makes the same financial moves as the high IQs just because

>>50856200
Underrated and checked

>>50862182
He was checking the 216 digits. Surely you realize why those are worth checking, right?

>>50855393
link is played the FUCK OUT. just buy BAT retards, it hasnt mooned yet and its just about to.

>>50856037

love how this post triggered all the nerds here
lmao

>>50862523
Hmmm maybe I was wrong this time

>>50862606
Checked.

>>50861726
> It's more of a statement of how infantile the smart contract space is still
Thanks for your answer but it doesn't really answer the question. I've heard it said that we've been waiting for Eth PoS and that Chainlink devs had to more or less help them along with it. I don't understand why they would do this at all if they can just operate across any chain.

>>50862690
which chains can they operate on? Solana? Cardano?

>>50862690
Because all of the other chains suck ass too and have way less users. Chainlink DOES operate across every chain but it's important in these early turbulent stages to have a solid foundation on a stable blockchain to release key features like staking. Imagine if LINK launched staking and then the merge fucks up, that *shouldn't* reflect on Chainlink but it would still fuck up their plans a lot more than if they kept things close to the chest and waited.

>>50862744
Ok, thanks.

>>50856037
based

>>50855551
w-why would his book drop when smartcon starts?

>>50862824
Probably nothing

>>50862402
Arbitrum and Link have taken a year to stress test their tech, they let people piggy back and "test in prod" which resulted in massive failures but ultimately strengthens the underlying tech... Kind of genius desu to offload that risky shit to other people, and create demand / awareness for the necessity of critical infrastructure being thoroughly built without hasty release.
>eth merge
>smart contract summit
>eth pos book
People will say we were lucky. God bless a$$bl@ster

>>50855544
>Link is in stealth mode right now just like Google was in the early 2000s.

Even in 2000 everyone knew google was miles ahead of ask jeeves and altavista, it was obvious it would be a giant

>>50863261

>>50863324
That's not what stealth mode means, for the millionth fucking time it is about hiding how profitable their ad services were. It's not about pretending to be a worse search engine.

nothing ever happens but it is interesting threads like these with a strong sense of community that keep me coming back to 4channel. Home is where the heart is

>>50863411
This. They don't understand. Nodes are getting subsidized because they aren't profitable. POS won't change that. CCIP won't change that.

how come ens are not attending smartcon?
what happened to emin?
what about the eth team? the shills gave up on the link is crucial to eth block building post merge angle pretty quick. only vitalik attending smartcon would convince me link is important for the future of eth.

right now it seems like eth will fork constantly and become the new nxt kek

>ccip read will be massive!
>arbitrim nova scotia is H U G E for LINK
>bancor and celsius are confirmed as ccip launch partners
B U L G A R I A N FUDDIES tongue my anus

>>50863550
shut the fuck up you tranny, atleast try and come up with some decent fud if you're gonna waste your time with this shit

>>50863735
>sh-shut up t-tranny
imagine insulting your most dedicated fanbase for posing honest questions about node profitability

>>50863735
>t-tranny

Notice LINK shills can never defend properly. Always resorting to low level insults and attacks like chimps. It's not FUD if the team is ADMITTING they are dumping 500k for it

https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xb9b012cad0a7c1b10cbe33a1b3f623b06fad1c7c

>>50862568
>nerds
>post cuck shit
Kys fag death to pissrael

Also DTCC crumbs proves the whole load

>>50863494
>>50863637
>>50863688
>>50863831
try and remember to change your id next time, ranjesh
>>50864088
what new and exciting fud. you have truly made me and many others rethink our investment in the chainlink token.

>>50863550
The public good fast-lanes and blockchain grants should help remedy the profitability problem

>>50859783
By this logic, why did Sergey even announce staking and CCIP in the first place?

>>50864088
you will have to answer to Him one day

>>50864393
Hard to say. Maybe he had reason to believe this time would be different and the merge would definitely happen this year, maybe he just said "fuck it" and hoped for the best after waiting for so long. I do find it surprising that he announced both features at the start of the year when both of them haven't been released 7 months later, it doesn't really make much sense to do that when usually they just release stuff when it's ready.

>>50864215
who said anything about selling?
I love the content here it is truly remarkable. The GPT4 Chan frogbots from Heroku are fantastic.

it appears that my ownership and custody of chainlink (ticker: LINK) tokens has some "people" quite flustered

>>50864453
you only have to answer to yourself anon you are an aspect of God here to experience his creation. the all is one.

>>50864479
>1pbti
I truly love the enjoyable content. Posts like this keep me coming back. Recycled memes are my new fetish. Please for the love of god keep posting them to give me a strong sense of community.

>>50864466
CCIP came out of the pegswap project when they hired ben chan. They extended the premise to include all blockchains in their blockchain agnostic approach. Pegswap is CCIP alpha version 0.1
https://pegswap.chain.link/

>>50864489
>>50864510
>>50864557
stop double posting and go back where you came from newfag. fucking triple posting now jesus christ

>>50864510
How about this recycled content:

NIGGER

>>50864586
great content excellent post. I will have to stay here it seems
>>50864584
can a bot

>>50864584
respond to

>>50864557
Wait, what does this do exactly?

>>50864584
fractured

>>50864584
thoughts?

>>50864619
convert erc20 link into erc 677 link for use on other blockchains
>>50864584
guess

>>50864584
not

>>50863402

>>50864668
Didn’t realize that was necessary

>>50857850
Confirmed for willful ignorance
You are not arguing in good faith

>>50864709
congrats, the thread is that much closer to the bump limit. great work flooding it

>>50855946
What a coincidence, every defi protocol also uses Chainlink.

>>50864747
It's only necessary because random bridges pop up which blindly just wrap a token and mint an ERC-20 on the other side without accounting for any deeper intricacy besides being backed 1:1. Since the LINK token is very much needed for transfer-and-call they made pegswap, it's pretty neat.

>>50864756
thank you I love holding my LINK and I am never selling.
Why are you so butthurt?
Make another thread. Flood the catalog it literally costs zero dollars to do so ksk

>>50864788
Pic related

>>50864756
the frogbot has successfully been trapped but anon's superior fractured posting technique and the crowd goes wild

>>50864836
why would i make another thread just to get flooded and derailed by discord trannies and pajeets. congrats, you've made the board unusable, really, great work.

>>50864826
Thanks Patrick

>>50864885
No problem, make sure to watch my next tik-tok and like and subscribe if you want more cool solidity videos!

>>50864864
I love this picture can you rename it and post it several thousand more times by eoy?
Imagine if all the content was just the same picture over and over again like a funny banana meme. What would anon do?
Oh wait they tried that years ago on /b/ ylyl threads. Maybe they need to have a collection of the same content like WMXF threads on /gif/ to post over and over again until the the hottest content becomes dull and repeative. Surely that will fuck over the pattern recognizers? Right?

....


Right?

>>50859647
There is no such thing as coincidence in my frame of reference.

>>50864879
Do not blame me, a single anon. Blame the Heroku GPT4 frogbots site is down now though
https://gpt-4chan.com/home

And the researchers from the mining the chans project fucking around in the name of (((science)))
Niggers

>>50864879
I often think that the evolution of slang should evolve faster than what a bot is capable of learning. Memes facilitate that somewhat but then it becomes diluted by spam i.e. the pepe testifying to the presence of frogbots without a doubt this becomes a mechanism to seriously consider when thinking about the state of memetic warfare. influential patterns are dangerous so they want to stop that of course. something for you to consider when you flood the catalog with new LINK threads. I really am not selling so Im just not gonna sell Hahahahahahah sorry if that makes you mad bro but Im just not gonna sell hahahahahahah

>>50855544
Why then does chainlink tweet ten times a day about literal whos, comments “gm” to anons and invites people to bigmac dinner?

>>50855946
I bet this nigga still uses yahoo mail

>>50865013
gm is quality content even the pajeets are saying it now!

>>50864756
sergey is a good dad for link-chan

>>50865024
this is like saying "I bet link threads just have recycled memes in them from years ago when they had quality community members contributing real content to them". In my mind there is no such thing as a pure objective frame of reference I just go off the empirical evidence.
Clear now that the community is as solid as ever contributing quality doubleplus good content and the chainlink project is stronger than ever and crypto as a whole has a distinct purpose and clear progress has been made towards that goal

bumpers looks like I killed the bots again
its all so tiresome. I hold LINK and I am happy with the quality of my norwegian babysitting advice forum

>>50855393
>This shit again
They give zero advice, they took a payday to have there name associated with it.
Thats it.
Literally nothing else.
Wake up.

>>50856200
>new roof
What level of retardism is this, should have picked something else. No one replaces the "roof" like that - it is an entierly new roofline.

>>50856329
you are collateral

>>50858021
>crypto board
Jesus Christ. Until this board is purged of low education "investors" it will literally never be good.

HELLO I AM A RETARDED SCHIZO

I looked into the ICE LINK thing today and it's true that theice.com is a sort of data connections corp that has a post-trade clearing service. Can someone explain to me how ICE link can be considered a "compliance oracle" like what project whitney calls out in their paper? Also, I can't find anything blockchain related on theice.com. Can't find anything related to compliance oracles either.

Also, wtf is Securrency Inc? This is a company I came across today. They are definitely involved in the digital asset/blockchain space, but why is their icon a hexagon just like link? Are hexagons just popular or some shit? Why is the hexagon popping up in so many corporate designs now?

>>50868194
https://securrencyltd.medium.com/securrencys-new-visual-identity-d95455660ae7
>Nov 18, 2021
>In this spirit, we are thrilled to reveal our new brand identity. Our evolved logo is the foundation of our new visual identity, and the logo’s design was a very purposeful decision. Despite our affection for our old logo, we wanted a mark that better reflects where Securrency is going and what Securrency is bringing to the world of finance.
>The hexagon core of our logo represents our compliance core that brings responsibility to this space, as well as a digital token with infinite possibilities.

haha what the fuck

>>50868194
>Why is the hexagon popping up in so many corporate designs now?
fren how are you so dilligent that you've come across this information but still so ignorant of meme magic?

>>50868194
>>50868564
>>50868645
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/securrency-opens-liquidity-lounge-in-davos-cutting-edge-discussions-on-the-evolution-of-capital-markets--the-future-of-finance-301546949.html
>WASHINGTON, May 13, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Securrency, a leading developer of institutional-grade blockchain-based financial and regulatory technology, opens the "Liquidity Lounge" on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos taking place May 22-26.
they are buddies with the WEF. everything i'm reading sounds like chainlink and deco without actually saying chainlink and deco, especially in this transcript
https://news.fintechnexus.com/podcast-375-dan-doney-of-securrency/

>>50868194
>>50868564
>>50868826
Yummy petroleum grade cope cider. I have had my fill for today, see you tomorrow marines

>>50868194
thanks for sharing this btw

>>50868194
>>50868564
>>50868826
>https://news.fintechnexus.com/podcast-375-dan-doney-of-securrency/
been reading this too it's spooky
>soft launch
>compliance tool
>linkage
>identity proofing

>I’ve been working with blockchain, liked blockchain so I built a tool and actually take and tokenize leases where you can bundle them together into a package and issue shares against that securitized package of leases that were dividend-paying currencies, that concept of a security that had the benefits of a currency that it was using to transact, but was a dividend-paying. We got a patent on that way back in the early days and backed security/currency gave rise to the company Securrency.

>I built the tokenization platform in, frankly, just a couple of months, I think and figured it would be easy for us to tackle the compliance problem.

>Four years later, we finally had a solution, but it took a lot of work to build out that core component and then along the way we found other key challenges. You can’t have liquidity without interoperability, you can’t have liquidity without sufficient pricing and that requires sufficient data

>So, WisdomTree is bringing to market several exposures, the dollar-based exposure, a gold-based exposure, treasury exposure and then others. They have a pipeline of anything that is an ETF can be brought into tokenized form

>For example, treasuries are frequently used as collateral in other transactions turns out through blockchain, collateral or processes can be automated in a very efficient way for things like lending. So now, if that asset is in tokenized form, it can be used as collateral efficiently against lending also in tokenized form so you open up all kinds of new business opportunities in the new decentralized world for the assets that traditionally couldn’t have entered these channels.

>>50864864
eric schmidt has his ass pressed up to the other side of that wall

>>50868996
>collateral (i.e. proof of reserves)
>interoperability
>sufficient data
Is CL funding them? Is this another CL whitelabel?
i'm almost convinced that
>>50868194
is spoonfeeding and dropped this crumb in the most subtle/plausibly deniable way that he could. his tone is almost too naive, I really think he's trying to spoonfeed without spoonfeeding. almost like socratic dialogue/questions.
or he just stumbled on it genuinely and we all may or may not be schizos.

>>50868564
ok, fresh breadcrumbs rule
can you smell what Sergey is cooking?

>>50861563
Ethereum is the settlement layer or the main decentralized computer that people will build on. Chainlink serves as the layer 0 and the connectors between Ethereum and its various L1 competitors and L2s and their competitors. Go ahead use another L1 or an L2 it doesn’t matter, Chainlink will relay the information and everything will be settled on Ethereum. I have a theory that vitalik dislikes Chainlink and Sergey not because he helps render Ethereum useless, but rather the only entities that will be using Ethereum in terms of gas fees and block space will be Chainlink node operators. Ethereum will still be valuable, but it will only have “one” user.

>>50868194
>>50868996
There is no fucking way this isn't Chainlink, unless they have secretly been building a 2nd Chainlink independently for the last 4 years.

>>50869122
kek. enjoying the recent off the cuff bants in link threads

>>50856200
So you’re telling me I don’t have to deal with fucking realtors to buy a house in the future?

>>50868194
>>50868996
>>50869147
Nothing ever happens.

>>50869147
>>50869195
it's almost certainly one of many chainlink whitelabel products or maybe one of Jason Parser's shadowforks. Has anyone checked if Securrency's CFO Jason Emery recently changed his last name?
https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/marketplace/apps/securrencyinc1584621712332.securrency-compliance-oracles?tab=overview
https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE4M6F0
https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-25-20/s72520-8569142-230826.pdf

>>50869245
>>50869147
You faggots were hyping Provide up a year ago as white label. Where's that at now? Fuck, I swear you guys have goldfish focus

>>50855544
>advisor

Honestly wasted trips & dubs. Im an engineer for VNQ and whenever we have other well established engineers from big firms on important calls, these “advisors” literal do fucking nothing and don’t even talk during teams or breakouts. Eric Schmidt as an advisor literally means nothing. They probably already had 20 meetings and he’s most likely only spoke in one of those.

>>50869270
Next one he's speaking at is SmartCon

>>50869147
I can assure you I'm just a retard thats been lurking since 2018 and have been holding 15k link since

the compliance oracle is likely ciphertrace's
https://ciphertrace.com/defi-compli-sanctions-compliance-oracle/
https://market.link/nodes/57a9cf23-fc11-45e7-ba5b-18975e4562cf/integrations
no jobs on mainnet but kovan has been quite active
https://kovan.etherscan.io/address/0xfF07C97631Ff3bAb5e5e5660Cdf47AdEd8D4d4Fd
can't really decipher info but I did find this little tidbit of information
>pic related

>>50856216
Hooray for LINK

>>50868645
not diligent, just schizo and good at browsing the internet. I found this after 5 minutes once I got the thought to pursue the icelink thing myself. all I did was google "compliance oracle" and looked at a couple pages of results, then found securrency being shilled on some microsoft azure backpage or some shit

>>50869330
Neet!1!1!1 That’ll probably be the 1 out of the 20 meetings I was talking about.

>>50869395
wagmi

>>50855544
Holy cope
>destroys link

>>50855544
>>50869443
2/2

>>50869330
Can you post the one about Tom Gonser now? Do you even know who he is, newfag?

>>50869265
>what is staking?

>>50869443
>>50869455
Do you newfags think you can compete with satoshi and steal his inventions? You have absolutely no idea whst is really going on.

>>50869501
No I’m too new to know about Gonser, Docusign, Salesforce, OpenLaw, Accord, Kaleido, Bletchley Cryptlets, please fill me in oh oldfag I am humbled in your presence.

>>50869580
Oh good, so you know about the scam artist circus and have fully bought in. Jeff from LinkedIn says hello. Arbitrum mainnet was a long hype cycle ago huh? How about the Office plug in that HAD to be using LINK based off a shape? You retards are amazing, Sept 2022 is the month of the rope

>>50869441
big guy numbers for you and me

the foundation I worked for last summer are selling their 10 million linkies in the morning.

Scam

>>50869620
Yet you're still in LINK threads seeeeeeeeething

>>50869959
I’m just here to see you all implode in real time. Next month is going to be amazing. Once SmartCon ends and nothing comes of it, you’re going to be absolutely butt blasted while ETH gets all the love

>>50869990
And I'm still going to keep holding LINK. Perverse, isn't it? I imagine we'll keep interacting while I come to /biz/ to talk about LINK and you come here to seethe about it.

>>50870002
We’ll be interacting alright. You’re not going to enjoy me next month. You hold your $8 token while I hold the $1800 one

>>50870013
>You hold your $8 token while I hold the $1800 one
OK, that was always the plan.

>>50869443
>>50869455
holy shit sergey is going to get sued and link will go to zero. i need to sell now

>>50869441
This level of hopium can’t be found in event my wildest of fantasies

>>50870076
All the world's verticals. All of them. There has only been a single unifying technology of every financial vertical in history prior to Chainlink, and that was "the internet" itself.
One LINK is literally a billionth of the new hyper-efficient, trust-minimised global internet. $81k is fud.
It is almost impossible to come up with a long term scenario that is too bullish. Our brain rejects that level of change.

>>50855393
those are all nobodies tho...half of them retired my nigga LMFAO

>>50855544
>bro just wait 22 more years

>>50863735
Based retard

>>50859323
>0 based coders, all middle managers that won't do shit for you
just luck us (or at least me) though
they're extremely good grifters. their lack of value doesn't make LINK a bad bet

>>50870016
Well, he will go to prison, mark my words

>>50868194
Isn't the compliance oracle service provided by blockstream?

>>50870109
Especially considering how I’ve never managed to invest in something that has made real money.
Link is the only thing I’ve ever put serious(for me) money into, and so far it’s been a frustrating experience to say the least.

2026 is an extremely aggressive target for those prices.
2030 might be the year a lot of these verticals start using Chainlink, but even that’s a short time to implement such big changes in the financial industry, which is notoriously difficult to alter.

Don’t get me wrong, I hope it hits $1000 this year, but I’m tired of getting my hopes up, only to be met with more defeat time after time.

>>50870245
Imagine if you had a huge inheritance that was due to pay out in 2030. Imagine if you just spent all the 2020s seething about "I want my money now" even though you were in the insanely enviable position of having that money guaranteed to come to you down the line.
Chainlink is inevitable, it just might not be soon. You can either waste time and energy being angry about it or you can chase other goals and improve yourself until one day you wake up and, holy shit, you're rich, but in the meantime you've achieved a bunch of other cool shit as well.
Aim high.

>>50855393
DTCC guy is a nothingburger for this year. Look at how far down they listen him. I' sure they listed the speakers in order of importance/significance/hype.

>>50870325
dont think so. they list multiple chainlink labs employees and they are not important/significant/hype worthy

>Link is the only thing I’ve ever put serious(for me) money into, and so far it’s been a frustrating experience to say the least.
this shows just how much crypto fucks with people's perspective
in traditional markets you used to be very happy with 4-6% a year
chainlink has given a 200x from the ico at the peak, and a 70x even now
crypto is basically a high risk, high reward market segment like biomedical research

>>50870109
People don’t understand that each data point that has been put on chain has a $ value attached. No one does this for free, and each additional data point shows the appetite for this technology. And because of the efficiencies they’ve introduced in terms of financial dynamics you can expect the 3B+ data points put on chain will exponentially increase half way before Q2 2023. And continuously increasing at an exponential rate. Only the Oracle is allowed to control immutability.

>>50870945
>No one does this for free
except neversellers kek

>>50870954
I mean it’s free money for them. Never sell and a future based on Smart contracts gives them infinite collateral.

>>50870945
>Only the Oracle is allowed to control immutability.
this guy gets it

>>50870183
Two more weeks. Trump and Craig to make a big cumback

>>50869443
>>50869455
https://web.archive.org/web/20220507120754/https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chainlink-thieves-inc-craig-s-wright/

>>50871021
An Oracle is good. But a decentralized network of Oracles is better. But a network of Oracles can be used to form just one Oracle. So we’re back at an Oracle. But if each Oracle was incentivized to tell the truth and nothing but the truth or they wouldn’t be an Oracle, then we have The Oracle.

>>50871094
kek creg is a massive faggot

>>50869443
>>50869455
3/2

I know, in this tick-tock world 15 years as an unimaginably long time. When people can’t manage to concentrate for 30 seconds, 15 years must seem an eternity. However, despite the claims innovation is not delayed because people steal and get away with it. Innovation is delayed because the inventors end up having to fight the thieves. In the case of the Wright brothers, other people stealing their innovation is hardly an innovation.

The same thing applies in the digital token and digital cash industries. When people take other people’s inventions without paying licensing, they are merely thieves. In time, all these organisations shall be closed down. Anything stored on them will be worthless. So when you’re told by people that it’s on a Blockchain so it is secure, remember that if it is not legally formed, it is very easy to stop. For those companies using Chainlink and related systems, I would like you to note that there is a patent pool, IPWe.com that allows you to legally create everything that these other people are stealing.

What they fail to tell you is that you can do all of this for fees that are 100 times lower than they are charging and on a system that is legal. That is, in two years it will exist. So, you should ask yourself the question do you want to build on a system built by people who steal? Do you want to build on the system from people who misrepresent and defraud? If you’re using these companies, that is what you’re doing.

>>50871398
Honestly can't tell if you're a Craig disciple or a Bulgarian.

>>50871407
I once was a link faggot like you, but some kind anons showed me the truth. I hope there are still are some smart anons that can see the truth and which have something to give the world when they make it with bsv. The time is running up.

>>50871398
>>50871407

even if that's true, it's bullish

facebook was founded off stealing and look how successful it was
noone gives a fuck you stupid nigger

>>50871470
Craig is not playing games, place your bets vice.

https://www.ontier.digital/post/bitcoin-creator-launches-ip-claims-against-digital-currency-exchanges

>>50856037
absolutely based
i kneel

>>50871468
OK I'll bite. Here's Craig's "smart contract" patent.
>COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE STATE OF A MACHINE EXECUTABLE CONTRACT IMPLEMENTED USING A BLOCKCHAIN
>filed February 23rd, 2022.
Five years after chainlink launched. This is what makes it hard to tell if you're actually serious.

>>50871869
Sorry and a link for anyone who cares:
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/craig-steven-wright

>>50868077
>Thinking anyone but some roofer tradie cares

>>50855393
LMAO. Who? Fucking literally who? At least get a celebrity or something. Not boring, geriatric white boomers

>>50871869
>>50871886
I don't know anon, over 100 patents for getting external data 3 years ago.

Starting 10:10
https://youtu.be/PXOBhLjx7-4

>>50870702
Right, but not everyone who put significant money in were able to do it at the ICO price.
The average price for my 10.5k link is $13.61, so I’ve DCA’d through the highs and lows of the last 3 years, but haven’t seen the same reward ICO buyers have.
I’ve worked construction since I was a teenager and the money I put into crypto is hard earned, so I am guilty of getting anxious about it.

If guys like me could get back into profit on Link at the very least, that would give us the hope to continue for another 4 years.
It’s hard holding something like Link when you’re at a loss and see all the constant fud and manipulation.
I’m constantly asking myself if I was duped into buying this, and the fantasy of having it go into 3 or 4 digits one day is just a big joke.
I still believe in Link fully, but if/when it hits 3 digits, no one will be able to say I had it easy.

>>50872091
>3 years ago
2019. I just don't see how Craig thinks a court will grant him exclusive rights to everything.

>>50872091
And I saw his 2019 "Oracle" patent. It's a box with a line coming out of it. Honestly looks like it was drawn on a napkin. I'm sorry but I just don't believe your man and his 'one chain to do literally everything in the world' idea. Too many diverse interests at play to make that a realistic possibility.

>>50855393
theranos also had a flashy board of directors

>>50872225
how do you still have the patience for cregposters

>>50872225
We'll see. Best of luck pal. I'm all in bsv and I really think craig aka satoj will prevail. IQ 180, invented bitcoin, patented everything necessery to scale blockchains, lawsuits starting, teranode released propably later this year, which makes the tps be in the millions, over 1 million BTC stash and so on, I don't think this ends too well for the rest of the industry.

One global chain.

>>50869245
Did we meme magic Jason Parsers shadowfork into reality

>>50872396
They fascinate me.

>>50872404
Lmao

>>50872404
And to you. If Craig pulls this off it'll be proof that God has a sense of humour. But he's a narcissist incapable of appreciating the notion that anyone other than himself is capable of thought, invention or action. Hence his term "thieves" to describe chainlink, who have had a host of brilliant minds working since the beginning.

>>50855544
It's insane how dumb you people are

>>50872404
If BSV needs megadatacenters to handle its huge blocks then isn't it extremely easy to control, as the govt has a very small list of participants to exert pressure on? How does it keep itself safe from govt interference/censorship?

>>50872786
It was invented to work in current law. It's not anti government. It makes the government truthful and makes corruption hard.

>>50872131
You work construction and have managed to invest $150,000 into crypto? That’s very atypical

>>50872853
Right so you take something that created another estate and balance of power against govt overreach, and turn it into something that cucks itself at the feet of the existing power structure (which is currently working as hard as it can to completely destroy the middle class.)
Thanks Satoshi.

>>50872872
It doesn't cuck itself to anyone. There will be one global ledger, one single source of truth. Everyone will have to knee to the bitcoin equally. The internet will be built on bitcoin.

>>50872945
If it "works in current law" then it bows down to the current system of complete kikery that is controlling the world.

>>50855551
>drops after shemitah

>>50872951
Kikes goes around the law because there's no system that stops them. Bitcoin will change this. You can't change the truth.

>>50872981
this goes back to my previous point about govt having leverage over a protocol that is validated by a small number of huge servers. The corrupt people in charge can control it because it's centralized. Why would they let themselves be held to account?

>>50872998
It's not cenralized when it's set in stone. Read >>50872945 No one can change the protocol. In pic is my favorite craig quote. There's nothing wrong with the law when everyone have to obey it equally.

>>50873063
holy fuck this thread went to shit kek

>>50856216
omg thats sooooo based

>>50873121
Take a rare nigger. When bitcoin bsv scales, it will cost a shitload of dollars to buy one real bitcoin bsv. Waiting for that teranode and shit they have been building on bitcoin.

>>50855393
The same as before.
People will be bullish when Chainlink will be in 3 digits.

There is a reason markets work as they do...

LINK is an unregistered security

>>50869443
Bullish for Chainlink and bearish for Craig.
He may really go to prison after all his lies catch up to him.
Sergey's "partners" just banned Tornado.
If Craig doesn't learn to keep a low profile they will take care of him too.

>>50873219
The wonderful thing is, no matter if they capture or kill craig, bsv will succeed. You can't stop it anymore.

>>50873280
What are those transactions? If millions of users are using BSV why does nobody seem to talk about it?

>>50873280
kek
succeed at being a scam?

Nobody cares about your scam premined shitcoin #18744
It's completely useless and was created by a narcissistic manipulator in order to get him money and power.

>>50873293
It was a stress test on mainnet mainly by one game "cryptofights". Current block limit is 4gb and when teranode comes, it'll be in terabytes. End of decade billions tps.

>>50855393
You're at $9 because Sergey is and has been dumping millions of tokens on the market over the past couple of year inflating the supply and reducing token price. What the fuck do you think would happen? All the extra cash flowing into link on good news goes straight to his pocket as it's just a signal to him to dump hundreds of thousands of tokens (amounting to millions over time) on the market over and over again so HE can soak up all the new money. It's the same with Algo, it's the same with hbar. If the founders have a massive stash the token price is going no where, even if they are using funds to improve the token, new investors and existing ones will pay for it. Right now is a terrible time to be in link; you either get in just after the VCs for fractions of a cent and dump along with them or you get in after they have exhausted their token supply not between. If you get in between those dates you're just a pay pig to funnel wealth from into their own pockets. Also will Link even continue as a concern once they dump their last tokens?

Another thing is why does link need its own token? If link wasn't about enriching Sergey and his harram he would of used ETH as payment; there is no need for his own except to rip wealth from you and give it to him. It's a forced token that unironically isn't needed.

>>50873482
>would of

>>50873379
You'll need a data center to store anything. If you want to put your dick on your table over wash trades then SOL fucking obliterates BSV in terms of total transactions per day. It does 9x that every single day even in a bear market.

>>50873490
You get the point faggot. Perform some mental gymnastics for me monkey. I can't wait to see the shit you come up with to defend Sergey and justify your bag-holding.

>>50873482
>what is sybil resistance?

>>50873482
>because Sergey is and has been dumping millions of tokens
Then explain how Matic, Solana, Fantom, Uni, ... all dumped WAY more tokens than Sergey, yet did incredibly well in the bullrun.
You absolute airhead.

>>50873492
Every transaction is paid to the miners intantly. There is no spam in bitcoin. Give me your bsv address and I'll send you 5 dollars right now. Then set up handcash wallet and go try haste arcade, make yourself to leaderboard and see the future of gaming in a real time.

>>50873522
I get these payments all the time, you can even play high roller $100 games and you can practise for free.

>>50873482
Sergey is a bastard man

>>50873514
They dumped them at the start. 100% of the tokens they had are dumped. Most of the remaining supply is staking rewards for those projects. They didn't drip feed them out like Sergey currently is. Here is an example to help you.
>total token supply 10 tokens for X project.
>release 1 token into the public (10% of the supply)
>let them compete for it, price discovery ensues.
>hold 9 tokens in reserve
>sell 1 extra token when in need of cash at market value
>tanks price of circulating supply as money is now competing for more tokens (100% supply inflation)
>Sold that 1 token at a way higher price than you would of releasing all 10 at once because the same pool of money was competing for a lower amount of tokens.
>rinse and repeat (good news will bring in additional money to compete for the tokens keeping it just as profitable for each dump)
That's how these people rip money from you with releasing low amounts of tokens. It's the exact same concept as money printing just with an upper limit.

>>50873772
>staking rewards
>not being drip fed out

keep bumping the thread please.

>>50870109
Would stuff like this be taken down due to muhhhhh hiding strategy? Oh yeah that right, no one gives a fuck

>>50873830
Is this your mind on link? Seriously? If you can't see the difference between staking rewards and a founder dumping on you, you get what you fucking deserve. Enjoy $50 next bull run, if you're lucky and Sergey doesn't just empty his bags on you.

>>50873772
>They dumped them at the start. 100% of the tokens they had are dumped
Are you some kind of super special retard?
Solana and Matic both dumped way more tokens since that pic than Sergey.

There's no way you're anything but a severely malfunctioning AI bot.

>>50873865
>Is this your mind on link?
What language do you speak at home?

Thank you for your concern. Why are you so concerned about my financial decisions.

>>50872131
believe it or not, link does not exist to get you in profit. it does not exist to give you hope to continue for another 4 years. link does not owe you anything. you're one of the luckiest people who has ever lived to be able to ride the coattails of the smartest people in the world today. show some gratitude fag.

>>50874544
this. hate the entitlement of some anons.

>>50855393
> smart money accumulating

>>50872131
The timeline for an investment is 7 years.
You chose the safest investment in the complete crypto space which means you should have the pay the price with a fitting amount of patience.
There was also a crab market for some time before Chainlink had its big main net pump. The current situation is not that different with the difference that the banking cartel wants to remove us now and is trying to take control of /biz/

>>50855544
>meds
take them now schizo
because it will be useless taking them when the API3 flipping finally happens

>>50874833
wtf is API3?

>>50864917
Go outside man

>>50862617
I had the loudest KEK in the morning, decided to come back now and give You a salute - CHAD KING shit my anon

>>50857709
for Your mom