/biz/ - Business & Finance

It doesn't mean big blocks are the solution

>>50816478
No?

>>50816478
Still no?

https://coingeek.com/bsv-2-5m-transactions-in-a-single-block-puts-all-other-blockchains-to-shame/

>>50816542
was satoshi retarded? I feel like a handful of massive server farms would be easy for governments to shut down?

>>50816875
Why would they shut it down? It was always supposed to work within the existing legal framework. The decentralization of bitcoin comes from the unchangeable protocol, not that every user runs a node. There even can't be over 2000 nodes in bitcoin.

>Is it reasonable that there are fewer than 10 nodes publishing the majority of blocks? Well, the difficulty adjusts every two weeks. So, if we take 'at any one time' to mean a two-week window, you already have an upper bound of around 2,000 nodes, the maximum amount of blocks in two weeks. Similarly, if you haven't produced a block in two weeks, we can say that you've dropped off this network. However, due to infrastructure challenges there are rarely more than around 20 nodes on the network at any one time. The majority of blocks are produced by fewer than 10 of these.

>>50816478
What part of "it never really hits a scale ceiling" do you not understand?

>>50816464
no one on here actually holds bsv right? this is just a very long-running gag here, kind of like locking your btc, right anons?

>>50817739
I wouldn't bet on a segshit coin, anon. I'll bet on satoshi and the real bitcoin.

>>50817802
information like this is useless unless you explain how to exploit it to take all of the "value" in the network for yourself and sell it for cash. and if it's such a clear problem, why hasn't someone done that already, proving they are correct and being paid for it?

>>50817855
What the fuck are you talking about? Bitcoin (bsv) will literally eat the whole digital world. Bitcoin is and always was perfect.