/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50727767
LUNC was worth $100+ a few months ago, its actively being worked on and there's a high chance of FOMO when the burn happens.

With all due respect, it seems that you ignored reality to write this post (bait).

In definitely a crypto expert.

>>50727767
>he is oblivious to the interdimensional reptilian jewish/pajeet alliance to FUD LUNC

ABSOLUTELY bluepilled

they will run it up when there are zero 0 holders. then when they catch even a 10$ fish they will crash it again. They have no way of making money or money input. its a known fraud that got busted. the dude will either die sooner or later but every one of these scum is going to die. just leave it they will rob you like kikes koreans are shit, the capital of south korea is the constitutional capital of north korea. its all one team ripping people off

>they will run it up when there are zero 0 holders. then when they catch even a 10$ fish they will crash it again. They have no way of making money or money input. its a known fraud that got busted. the dude will either die sooner or later but every one of these scum is going to die. just leave it they will rob you like kikes koreans are shit, the capital of south korea is the constitutional capital of north korea. its all one team ripping people off

>>50727869
you're right I thought it would pump the other day, but it crashed faster than anything I've ever seen. Going to stay away. These people are mentally insane.

>>50727912
A few weeks ago, it was hovering at $70 per million and pumped back to $100 per million, its been stable since then.

Listen to their representative HappyCattyCrypto on YouTube. He helped me convince that they aren't all deluded pajeets

>>50727805
lunc was never worth $100 luna was incel this isnt luna. Lunc is a nothing burger.

>>50727767
off topic banter is normal for any general thread. the people holding lunc are expecting a clown-world outcome, so not really schizos, they're more like fantasy-enjoyers

>>50728038
Terra Luna (now Luna classic (LUNC)) was called Luna before there was a new Luna coin. The new coin was only ever worth max, $50.

Do you understand the details of the Terra Luna crash/de-pegging from UST? It sounds like you're just being contrarian honestly.

>>50727767
>What do you think about Lunc?
LUNA was flawed by design, imploded and was destroyed. What remains is just the wreckage that was renamed to LUNA classic.

>>50728132
apparently you dont understand. luna took their shit with them there is nothing on this bs chain

>>50728218
I give up anon, I'll pour out some expensive liquor for you on my yacht

>>50727832
I’ve got 11 mil anon, are you baboona’d aswell?

>>50728132
Do you understand what a market cap is?

>experts

Expert here, lunc used to be worth so much per token because there were quadrillions less tokens in supply. There is no way to burn these tokens unless it means buying them back from users wallets, or users burning them themselves. 1. is far too expensive, and 2. who in their right mind is burning their own tokens?
A lot of lunc holders don't understand market cap or the truth behind burn mechanics, and just how big of a burn this would require (biggest in history x 1m) hence you get $1 eoy $10 eoy posts. The truth is the baggies are the same gamblers talking about the shib burn and the safemoon burn and every other rebase token burn too, just uneducated and hyped.

There is no way enough tokens are burned to reach $1 or $10, no business is going to spend an absurd amount to buy back and burn tokens for no benefit to themselves. Lunc is at fair price now, and will likely hang around this area or a bit lower/higher for the rest of its life

>>50728290
Almost there, less than a milly to go.

>>50728291
total supply * last selling price

>Expert here, lunc used to be worth so much per token because there were quadrillions less tokens in supply. There is no way to burn these tokens unless it means buying them back from users wallets, or users burning them themselves. 1. is far too expensive, and 2. who in their right mind is burning their own tokens?
>A lot of lunc holders don't understand market cap or the truth behind burn mechanics, and just how big of a burn this would require (biggest in history x 1m) hence you get $1 eoy $10 eoy posts. The truth is the baggies are the same gamblers talking about the shib burn and the safemoon burn and every other rebase token burn too, just uneducated and hyped.
>There is no way enough tokens are burned to reach $1 or $10, no business is going to spend an absurd amount to buy back and burn tokens for no benefit to themselves. Lunc is at fair price now, and will likely hang around this area or a bit lower/higher for the rest of its life

>>50728255
DO IT BE FARTING?

>>50727767
>hey were talking about aliens, and reptiles in human skin, and shit like that.
seems like a normal day on /biz/

>>50728355
the smartest rebuttal from a lunc holder ever recorded

>the smartest rebuttal from a lunc holder ever recorded

>>50727767
this: crypto was and still is a parallel system to fiat that's one of the few remaining vectors of danger to the kikes' stranglehold of finance, and by extension their dominance over all other spheres of human endeavor. They can't afford anything to threaten their position as the money masters, which is why they're crashing crypto in an attempt to shake out the normies and scoop up all assets for pennies on the dollar before firing up their media machine and pumping everything back up once they're done robbing the plebs blind (and thus pricing normalfags out of the crypto market forever). A LUNC revival would throw a wrench in their plans because it adds a degree of unpredictability, and lessens their control over the entire space. It would also pump the whole market once more before the kikes are ready, all while moving a portion of financial power into the hands of disagreeable anons who hate their guts and know them for what they are.

These people OWN the money printers, they don't think in terms of $$$, they think in terms of human malleability and decade-long psyops campaigns. They'll fuck over all of crypto if it means disenfranchising the goyim, and they'll make a profit doing it! On the other hand, there's people like CZ and a bunch of pissed off nerds who see what's going on and want a piece of the pie. All of us here are fortunate that we can ride the way to riches, we just have to fill our bags.

Anons, buy LUNC, and hold LUNC! Anything below its ATH is FUD. We'll reach 1-2$ by EOY, it's a given.

Also it'd be good if a graphics-savvy anon could compile that entire list of posts into a single collage for use in future threads. We can nip the FUDders in the bud every time they show their inbred, hook-nosed heads.

>>50728340
>There is no way to burn these tokens
what about the burn tax coupled with fomo multiplier?

>>50728255
youre a clown, same blockchain but thats it thats irrelevant, saying lunc was $100 is asinine and stupid because whats known as lunc was never more than the decimal point and several zeros it now is

>>50727767
Maybe if king faggot didn't fork it, when there was some momentum back in May, whatever I bought at absolute rock bottom and made some nice gains I wanted to let it ride for awhile tho.

>>50728391
gimmicky tokenomics you see from many many rebase projects etc. given the circulating supply and the volume traded it would take centuries for enough tokens to be burned to put it anywhere near $1. you can do up a spreadsheet to estimate how long it would take.

>>50727767
Expert here.

Buy ShibaGrow

>>50728404
If you didn't call me a clown, I wouldn't have used a crayon for you

>>50728350
Ok now run the numbers for say, 50c and tell me what the marketcap would be.

>Inb4 9000 gorillion tokens will be burned

Lol

Lmao

>>50728445
>gorillion
u can't just invent units lol, join us in general lunasisters have already done the math for up to $4 per coin

>>50728476
>lunasisters have already done the math for up to $4 per coin

Ah so I guess all the tokens except the ones you guys hold will be getting burned? KEK and where is the liquidity coming from??? Truly you are incredibly retarded.

>>50727767
The only retard I see here is you OP.

>>50727869
$10 fish you say? That would make me 200 million USD

>>50728442
kek he keeps repeating himself as if I dont know the price of luna which is now called lunc, was $100 before. He seems to think that means something and is obviously implying that because of that it will have a bearing on the future of lunc. You can't be over 17, 21 tops. Someone explain to him Ive tried.

>>50727767
If only you knew how bad things really are

I'll repost images laughing at this thread when LUNC hits a new ATH, over $120, and I'm getting my dick sucked in a Maserati while doing blow off your sister's ass.

>>50728555
>saying lunc was $100 is asinine and stupid because whats known as lunc was never more than the decimal point and several zeros it now is

brother, this is what you said before

>>50728571
>I'm getting my dick sucked in a Maserati while doing blow off your sister's ass.

lol, kek wills it

>>50728340
A small decrease in supply plus a MEGA clown world pump could put half a cent (.005) in the realm of possibility, which would be a 50x from here

>>50728587
What is wrong with what I said. All of things that made luna worth $100 at one point have no association with lunc of today.

>>50728659
>lunc was never more than the decimal point and several zeros it now is

the "was never" bit

>>50727767
I think it's shit, what i do think a worthwhile investment, its VINU, just released it's app and it's doing massive x2 here and there, total investment you should do

wagmi

>>50727767
>>50728003
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxzTbj-S-0g
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfBoWyhaQ3c
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE8LHS5VDaM&t=1901s
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGcjEU8k_4U
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv3qqdubFNI&t=1s
If you want info from a good source then listen to these interviews from the devs. This is the best you'll get.

My LUNC is BABOONC
Cope OP.

>>50727767
I have 70k lunac that I got for free. Just gonna hold it for a few years and hope it's the next shiba or some shit next cycle. In shit like this, any money you put in, consider it gone.

>>50727869
Usual ESL garbage

>>50728375
>the smartest rebuttal from a lunc holder ever recorded

>>50729126
>and it's doing massive x2 here and there, total investment you should do
SIRS DO INVEST IN VINU MY VILLAGE NEED FOOD

>>50728154
Beats me why fags like to get rekt. Projects come and go and luna's time is over. Time to focus on better innovation like payment solutions. real world problems need to be solved.

>>50728439
Stfu if you have no idea of a thing. This isn't meme season. Find some staking rewards like cake pool or xpress, or hfsp

>>50731042
You glow more brightly than the sun.

>>50730306
Glad you got it for free. How long do you intend hodling? I prefer dealing with solid fundamental project with real life application than investing shitty shoddy project.

>>50731042
>real world problems need to be solved
Your judgement is absolutely correct. We are both in consensus.

>>50729126
Sounds like rug. Speaking of apps, cryptoxpress mobile app comes with staking campaigns. Do yourself a favour.

>>50731106
Good anon. Plebs don't get it. Not that I care. If you don't learn anything from rugs, you're worse than a retard.

>>50727767

>>50731209
I don't fucking care. As we all know, adoption is always followed by price movement. This is one of the few reasons I'm keying on Geeq and a few others, because it can easily be adopted.

>>50728340
>it means buying them back from users wallets, or users burning them themselves.

I stopped reading your pretentious dribble here. Are you unaware of the 1.2% burn tax? Go kys you uninformed retard. 1.2% burn tax + FOMO + increasing volume from said FOMO ( we’ve seen post crash Luna reach 5 billion dollars) = burning down the supply to 10 billion in less than 2 months.

Number go up?

>>50731502
Who fucking cares about your shoddy project? I don't fucking care. Once bitten, twice shy.

>>50731759
soon