/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50652780
This guy really is Satoshi, isn't he?

>>50652780
>>50652791
>STILL no signature

>>50652824
What's your point? The signature is completely irrelevant in the face of all the other evidence.

>>50652899
>all the other evidence
such as?

>>50652899
The only evidence that matters is if he has the ability to move the Satoshi coins from one wallet to another one. If you can't do that you're not Satoshi no matter what cult of personality you weave around yourself and no matter how many fools you dupe into believing you. Even if he was Satoshi (which he isn't) why would he have any power over the protcol? It's ran by miners, developers have no power beyond proposing shit to them. Also where is the pineapple? Why hasn't coinbase collapsed like he said it would EOM? If you continue to fall for the bullshit of these charlatans (like him, richard, charles, leemon) hook, line and sinker every single time you deserve to be a goy slave and your money is better off in their hands.

>>50653047
You seem really invested in him not being Satoshi. What do you have to lose if he is? Craig is building the white paper Bitcoin. So even if he isn't the original, he is carrying the torch of Satoshi. You are so focused on the person and not the tech. You are not going to make it.

>>50652791
yes
>>50652824
>>50653047
retards
>>50652972
Do some research, go on youtube and search Craig Wright. There are literally hours worth of videos of him talking about Bitcoin and demonstrating his deep knowledge of it. BSV is the realization of his original idea and it is being demonstrated every day that it can in fact scale.

>>50652899
Crypto isn't about trust, about drama, about excuses, about endless larping, about legal battles, about hearsay, or about private seances ("hurr durr someone said he signed in secret for them in a private meeting"). Crypto is about keys and addresses and coins moving around. Period. That's it.

So sign or move some coins, or fuck off Craig. You can't EVER touch Satoshi's coins because you don't have his keys.

>You are so focused on the person
BSV is an entire cult built around the persona of Craig Wright LARPing as Satoshi. Nobody is more invested in the idea of Craig being Satoshi than the BSV cultists.

>>50653115
>>50653151
How much are you guys paid to shit up this board? Instead of addressing my points you just attack me. Funny that's a common tactic shills employ when they have no legitimate answer. I accept you concessions, you need not reply.

>>50653151
Endless larp and fake drama.
>something is coming, 2 more weeks guys, buy my coin!

Anyone got the screenshot/video from 2 years ago saying he was going to reveal "fatal flaw" in XMR in a few months? Nothing happened, of course.

SEGWIT FATAL FLAW!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wansagfJnbo&t=95s

>>50653209
Related: >>/biz/thread/S16722946

>>50653335
Funny how the shitskins shilling for this guy have now retreated from the thread. Thanks for the info kind sir.

>>50653197
I do this for free

>shit up this board
as opposed to the daily shit coin shill threads, XRP generals, link marines, ICPers, etc?

>Instead of addressing my points you just attack me
What exactly do you want me to address?

>Even if he was Satoshi (which he isn't) why would he have any power over the protcol?
he doesn't, that's the point retard. He actually hates being the center of attention but you faggot smaller blockers keep harassing him.

>It's ran by miners, developers have no power beyond proposing shit to them
as it should be. the protocol is locked, meaning the core functionality of Bitcoin will never change, much like many other protocols in existence today. Developers are free to improve the node software or build on top of the protocol.

>Also where is the pineapple?
same old shit

>Why hasn't coinbase collapsed like he said it would EOM?
it would seem they're well on their way (SEC investigation, arrests of employees, cratering stock price, major changes to their platform, etc)

Why not just hide or ignore these threads? Why make the effort to come in here and spout your tired bullshit? Maybe you're afraid?

>>50653365
I come into these scam threads because people like you prey on newfags so you have someone to dump your useless shit on. You rely on falsities and propaganda to sell them X as Y but when it is in fact Z. You act like the jews, subverting, manipulating to get your hands on others wealth which is the lowest form of human behavior and thus should be attacked and purged on sight. You always mention CW as Satoshi because it implies BSV is undervalued by many orders of magnitude and it implies BSV should be worth $25k per coin when it's sitting in the tens of dollars. You are selling the idea that once enough people think CW is the inventor of BTC people will dump bitcoin en mass for BSV and that their worthless, useless bags will be pumped to BTCs current price and that they are early on the greatest trade ever. What you are implying is malicious to the core and a representation of true evil. Kill yourself. You are worse than vermin, a parasite even and the world will be a better place once you are gone. I'll even donate $10k to a charity of your choice if you stream it.

>>50653047
>The only evidence that matters is
what the network can do
Satoshi is irrelevant to results.

>>50653526
Not reading all that shit, if you can somehow definitively proove that Craig isn't Satoshi then go ahead, otherwise shut up. Craig is the only person on the planet currently who is fulfilling Satoshi's (Craig's) vision of what bitcoin is supposed to be.

>>50652824
No hymen, no diamond.
No signature, no Satoshi.

>>50653526
I'm not telling anyone to buy. I'm not telling anyone BSV will moon or they will be rich overnight. I'm simply expressing my viewpoints on BSV and how, in my opinion, it is the only blockchain that can actually scale. I'm a developer and I've spent the last 5 years jumping from chain to chain to figure out the best platform to build on. BSV is the best by far and will only get better. I simply want to encourage others to do their own research instead of listening to people like you who only serve to distract with irrelevant talking points. I follow the tech and BSV's tech is the best in my opinion.

>>50653561
Not reading any of the senseless and cringe pro-BSV propaganda.
>craig still hasn't signed
>well uhh no, but how about this and that and so and so and oh look over here wow omg check this out
It's just endless excuses and distractions.

If you, Craig, can prove on the blockchain that you are Satoshi, then go ahead. But we all know that's never going to happen, so fuck off.

>>50653767
Why does he need to prove it when there's enough evidence already that he is Satoshi?

>>50653786
it's the only argument they have left at this point

>>50652780
BSV is for poor fags

>>50653151
>do some research
so you're unable to present even a single piece of evidence. gotcha.

>>50653693
what are you developing on BSV?

>>50652972

>>50653786
>more words, still no signature
yawn

>>50652824
>>50652972
>>50653047
>>50653155
>>50653209
>>50653244
>>50653278
>>50653335
>>50653357
>>50653526
>>50653691
>>50653767
>>50653822
>>50654033
>>50654355
>>50654388
1 Shekel has been deposited to your account. Thank you for your service.

>>50653786
Because evidence is not proof. Definitive proof is rare in court cases, it's mostly circumstantial evidence. But the charlatan in his incompetence picked a lie where proof is possible, even painfully obvious. It's so obvious that even children might ask him: "Hey you creepy weirdo, I heard Satoshi has tons of bitcoin, and you tell everyone you are Satoshi, so do you have all those bitcoins? Yes? Can you move them around to prove you aren't just making the whole thing up?" He can't, and his reasons for not doing the obviously very simple thing if he was who he claims to be give me major second hand embarrassment.

>>50654850
if you exist you can bark
prove you exist by barking like a little bitch

your refusal to acquiesce to my demands might be manifold, and they are your reasons alone.
Being a little bitch is contingent upon being at all, but your being is not contingent upon being a little bitch.

In ten years will we still be getting these hilarious qboomer threads while BTC is 500k?

>>50652972
Such as this, still not enuf??

>>50652780
lol he had to get the covid vaccine to enter the US

>>50652791
Sneedtoshi.

>>50655150
Are you saying it is somehow demeaning to a cryptographer to prove his identity by signing a piece of data with his private key? Is that the reason why he doesn't sign it, because it's beneath him? That's literally one of the primitive operations his whole field is built on, it should fill him with pride to be able to prove his identity so publicly without a doubt by such a simple act. Imagine the headlines and attention he'll get, deservedly so, because he proved to clearly and elegantly with the tools of his trade that he is who he claims to be. Such a simple thing for him to do, he does it all day, and yet such a profound effect on the whole industry.

>>50652780
Frens, I have looked into it. Craig is satoshi. Its a long and difficult story, much harder than I would want it to be. For deeper truths you always have to dig.

>>50652780
All good, but wtf is wrong with the price?

>>50655907
But perhaps he is just busy fighting off the collapse of Coinbase and Kraken that is occurring right now, as he predicted. Maybe he can sign the transaction afterwards? Or even use it to stave off the ill effect on the people caused by the imminent collapse of these companies? Poor guy, he must be itching to prove his identity by using his private key to prove that he owns Satoshis public addresses. It's his protocol after all, demonstrating the fundamentals to prove that his invention works and that it is indeed his, it must fill him with childish glee and anticipation.

>>50654057
Just experimenting for now. There's a big learning curve but I've got a few ideas. Micropayments are a game changer for web apps and BSV allows for very tiny payments very quickly. Something like a 4chan clone would be fun to create. Pay 10¢ to create a thread, 1¢ to reply, half going to the author of the thread, the other half going to the developer to pay bills. Twetch is a really good example of a system like this. The idea is to allow users the chance to generate income from their content.

>>50657060

sirs pls buy bsv or my village will starve

>>50653047
you guys say the same crap in every thread, it's all so tiresome to answer it.
he's satoshi and btc is a scam. it's just getting more obvious everyday.

>>50652780
based BSV is the future lmao imagine being into low-cap shitcoins

>>50655907
>>50656088
or it is not merely ancillary to his purposes but counter-productive.

Someone having the means to do something does not demand they must follow through on it.

You don't need "Satoshi" to see BSV. If you do, you're not interested in BSV; you're interested in a proverbial false messiah. It's satoshi's vision, not satoshi's chain. Like the white paper? Good. Which chain best reflects that paper. Satoshi who? He's not relevant.

>>50657060
>The idea is to allow users the chance to generate income from their shit posts.
nice

>>50658999
checked

What's the make it stack?

>>50659668
1

>>50659417
Are you saying that Mr. Wright might not be Satoshi after all and the only thing that counts is that he follows his vision? Then why is he telling everybody that he is, in fact, the person Satoshi? Doesn't that call his ability to follow Satoshis vision in question, when he makes such a bold claim without backing it up? He could say: "I follow the spirit of Satoshi to the letter because I believe in his vision, what an inspiration to us all, an ideal we should all strive to follow." insted of "I follow Satoshis vision, because I actually am Satoshi himself, so all the other devout followers of his vision actually can't be as good as me, see?". It calls his credibility and integrity into question, is all.

>>50654355
Is this a joke? The paper looks like a 5yo tried to make it old, burn marks, really? LMAO anyone believing this clown is a fucking retard

>>50661261
Yes it is a joke that core cucks have latched onto because they're desperate for anything that might help their cause of spreading misinformation.

>>50652780
Someone answer this:
Why would a faggot egomaniac obsessed with titles and recognition ever publish something without his name on it and keeping anonymity for years, them reveal himself with no proof and a total change of personality?
Kinda sus fr

https://www.ccn.com/text-analysis-confirms-craig-wright-not-satoshi-nakamoto/

>>50661318
because he didn't think it would succeed with his name on it originally, but it's been crippled and corrupted and that forced him to come back to fix it
it's just obvious, blockstream et al are dragging their feet with lightning network, making some elaborate layered shitshow that will never work properly, keeping it as digital gold prevents it from competing and replacing mastercard and visa
craig comes in forks it, raises the blocksize and suddenly bitcoin can do more tx a day than all the top 10 combined

>>50653693
Not so fast Goy!

>>50662125
You don't listen Goy. Satoshi is an egomaniac even though he tried to be anonymous and only admitted to being Satoshi after being doxxed by Gizmod and Wired Magazine.

>>50658771
YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND GOY! You need to prove to me within a conceptual framework that I setup using only the evidence that I preapprove and deem valid in advance of our discussion.

>>50652899
If bsv is going to absorb the entire world's wealth and functionality, the signature could have settled this years ago. Instead, I'm still waiting for the rolling iceberg.

>>50661261
yes and no
calvin is sandbagging

>>50662478
>>50662552
Just move the fucking coins, Craig. You move ONE fucking coin, hell you move ONE fucking Satoshi, and everyone is going to jump onto true Bitcoin (ticker BSV). Until then shut the fuck up. We aren’t buying your bags to pay your fucking legal fees. Hal Finney was 99.99999% to be the actual Satoshi Nakomoto.

>>50657060
haich.us was a 4chan clone on bsv. Also had a meme library where every image uploaded would be kept and you could just browse for something to add as your image for a post.

>>50663096
Yes, The Goyim need to shut up. That means STOP TALKING NOW GOYS! It doesn't matter how many times he signed and how many proofs he made!

DELET THIS!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R03ypV9CsTc&t=2632s

>>50653115
Haha. It's the way you say he is not gonna make it for me. Lol.
People are not just accepting to innovations because of skepticism. People are just too scared I understand.

>>50654790
Funny you guys should be getting the reply you made, but you make this post in reply to anyone just asking simply questions. You guys dodge with posts like yours though, never really saying anything besides condescending language, when really you never have said shit and then you want anons to unironically take the rusty-staples (obviously and intentionally aged) white paper as some proof. This guy has everything to gain from this larp, and nothing to lose from giving an actual proof.

I dont have any stake in it one way or another- consider me an unbiased outsider on the matter. but there really is a cult like vibe that is unquestioning and 100% faith-based. You guys immediately sneer when called out. Just looking at the pro shills vs anti shills in this thread gives me all the info I need though

>>50663325
Speaking of innovation, what do you guys think about the AMM and order book features of Equilibrium? It seems those guys have a lot to offer this Q3.

>>50663548
What I heard of was the low collaterization of 105% when one borrows on the EQ platform. It appears there are several other benefits.

>>50653151
Sorry Phil Wilson is Satoshi. The actual bitcoin Dev. Read bitcoin origins.

http://vu.hn/bitcoin%20origins.html

>>50653047
He had 1 million btc.
He can singlehandedly destroy a bullrun for decades

BSV cucks coping hard

>>50657213
>>50657224
>>50657239
>>50657283
Why haven’t the jannies deleted these yet?

>>50663939
>Sorry Phil Wilson is Satoshi. The actual bitcoin Dev. Read bitcoin origins.
>http://vu.hn/bitcoin%20origins.html
I'm currently reading his. He has 0 evidence. At best, he was part of the team and contributed some important pieces. At worst he's a story teller and a bad one at that... he basically makes big claims and then plays it down how easy it was for him to solve it and then he overplays the reaction of the others to oh god how amazing he is for solving it. I struggle believing him. But it's hard to say, if he was indeed an anonymous contributor, but has 0 evidence, then the only way to confirm that would be for CSW to do so. CSW surely was the main part of the system, but even he says others helped him. The question is how much.

You craig cum guzzlers are not even pathetic; you're just a lower form of life.