/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50610874
>What now, fudder faggots?
they will come to this thread and cry kek

Why is big tech so obsessed with race?

>>50610891
>they will come to this thread and cry kek

>>50610874
Now we dump to 1c.

>>50610943
That is all alts right now. Enjoy your shitcoins, this and Link actually have real world use-cases and will flourish.

>>50610943
>>they will come to this thread and cry kek
and there you are

>>50610894
Inclusivity by segregation

>>50610891
HOLY SHIT THE META PARTNERSHIP WE'VE BEEN LATCHING ONTO FOR MONTHS TURNS OUT TO BE A HECKING RACIAL DEMOGRAPHICS SURVEY. TOTALLY NOT PRICED IN. TO THE MOOOOOON. FUDDERS SEETHING.

fr though, I'm fucking seething because I've been holding this shit for 6 months waiting for this and it turns out to be complete irrelevant trash. Holding through a fucking 80% loss waiting for this shit.

>>50610990
lol, lmao, LMFAO even

>>50611011
>cry
kek

>>50610990
>That is all alts right now
Not true. The other alts pumped 100x before the crash. Literally every rose holder is down on their initial.

>>50611031
Rose
>Multiple genetics companies partnerships
>Meta partnership
>BMW partnership

Link:
>Hyperledger
>LexisNexis flight insurance data
>Swift
>Weather reporting / crop insurance

Problem?

>>50611078
>The other alts pumped 100x before the crash.
That's fine. Rose will have it's time in the sun. I know it's a meme on this board, but the project actually has good fundamentals.

king shit coin dropping again lmao.

>Rose will have it's time in the su-ACK

>>50610874
>>50610891
>>50610894
>>50610943
>>50610949
>>50610990
>>50611011
>>50611021
>>50611025
>>50611031
>>50611052
>>50611078
>>50611085
>>50611120
>>50611202
>>50611242
OOOOOOOOO IT'S HAPPENING BROOOOOOOOSE

>>50611296
LOL

its always about race with these people
as soon as you hear the words "fairness" or "inclusivity" or "diversity" it's always always about race, or gender.

and assessing the race or gender (gender being a made up word to include the two actual sexes as well as an infinity of made up sexes) in order to be "fair" to them means making sure "minorities" are getting the preferential treatment they arbitrarily deserve for some reason.

actual fairness would involve not even asking someones race because you don't care because it doesn't matter

>>50611296
Fucking kek. Rosechuds btfo.

>>50611296
ok this made me audibly kek. Well played anon.
>>50611374
I agree but that has nothing to do with Oasis. That is Meta's problem. Oasis is just a business helping Meta with what they were hired to do.

Oh boy, what a big partnership. They are just using Oasis to find out more about niggers, which is worthless.

>>50611553
hired to do what exactly? honest question. reaching beyond the corporate bullshit about "fairness" or whatever what is actually happening here? tell me in actual human language what oasis is actually technically doing here. do you even know or are you just salivating at the thought of a big corporate cock coming into your mouth?

>>50611587
You're a braindead nigger. Who cares what it's being used for? The actual fact is that this is being onboarded into mainstream industry.
>>50611925
It's using Oasis tech to keep research participants' personal info anonymous while still being able to be analysed and provide useful info. The exact details aren't released but I assume it's running on either the Cipher or Parcel paratimes. The operation would use the Rose token as per any other implementation.

>>50610990
this (with supply is basically $50 cent link)
though i dont think the final market cap of ROSE can get near what LINK will do 1/10th may be undervalued compared to LINK but idk
god i just want to get a job offer soon so I can start buying more of all this bottomed out crypto
if it gets cheaper I just benefit at this point

>>50612053
well this would be the first time meta has shown any interest in collecting personal info anonymously. their entire business model is about collecting personal info, linking it to your real identity, and then selling that to the nsa and advertisers.

can they collect info anonymously and deliver targeted ads also anonymously? is that even conceptually possible? if so maybe they could use rose for this. it could represent a shift in their entire business model. but i don't think the nsa (their biggest customer) would like it.

and what does this do the token price? meta needs to buy rose to make this work? at what point would the price of rose rising cut into their profits?

>>50612424
Pic related is the anonymizing process.
It looks exactly as described in Oasis' docs about their privacy paratimes, although desu I am no longer sure if the Meta development actually uses the Oasis network!

>>50612600
thanks for the response. it seems based on this slide that it is technically possible to collect personal information and even perhaps deliver targeted ads without knowing or storing the identity of the peoples involved or their info.

i'm now imagining the following scenario
person a, lets call him bob, watches a video about ford trucks. bob is assigned a number and "video about ford trucks" is assigned another number. these numbers are stored on the meta servers allowing ford to buy targeted ads to send to bob without meta knowing who bob is or that hes interested in ford trucks.

correct me if im wrong but if it could work like that, then rose could be the foundation of a new ad economy. not just for meta but for google perhaps and anyone else that might want to do this.

my only concern is that meta and google etc are absolute pieces of shit who get sick evil pleasures violating personal identity in order to report it all to the satanic government agencies. they don't want to preserve our privacy so why would they do this.

the other thing i dont understand is how i, as a potential rose investor, could profit off this without eating into metas profit margin because they're not interested in sharing a slice of the pie. but i am liking the concept but how does oasis get paid and how do i get paid?

Insider here.
I can finally come out and tell you all that the rest of us insiders have sold our bags in January anticipating this. Thanks for buying our bags. You will never see 60c again.

>>50612967
>person a, lets call him bob, watches a video about ford trucks. bob is assigned a number and "video about ford trucks" is assigned another number. these numbers are stored on the meta servers allowing ford to buy targeted ads to send to bob without meta knowing who bob is or that hes interested in ford trucks.
Yes that is exactly how it works. Actually, the privacy-preserving tech is pretty groundbreaking and opens up a lot of avenues for mainstream adoption. One application is defi; curently you have to be overcollateralised to receive a loan because you can't prove credit history to the defi platform. However, through Oasis you could prove your credit score without having to reveal all your other personal details, which opens up the avenue for under-collateralised lending.

Also, your example reminds me of an example they used on their blog:
https://medium.com/oasis-protocol-project/driving-innovation-with-differential-privacy-620a31e3d61f
(read the section "A Case for Differential Privacy").

Btw, if this reads like a shill/pajeet post I can only say that I'm actually just someone who reads up about this project a lot and follows all their latest postings.

>>50611031
>FOTM meme reply

>>50613567
even if you were a shill i wouldn't mind since most shills can't even answer basic fucking questions about how the product actually works. they just post pepes and tell me to "get in or stay poor". so a shill that could actually explain the technical merits of a project would be a breathe of fresh air from the usual lazy shillery that treats me like a dumbfuck and just demands i hand over money

>>50613683
basically i demand the shills do my research for me and spoonfed me the merits of their project. and i don't believe this is an unreasonable demand because a thousand projects are shilled here and i dont have time to do my own research on all of them. in this thread i have been given a valid reason to look into oasis, thats all i ask. the kda shills also at least try to shill me on the technical merits though i still have doubts about whether anyones actually developing there (when dex?) but so many projects that shill here have fuck all to say about anything and just advertise at me without explaining anything and im not going to make the time to look into them. im just venting my annoyance at this point

>>50613783
That's fine, I've read a lot about the project and happy to explain it and see if other anons can find a reason for me to lose confidence in the project haha.
Pic related is some partnerships that they've elaborated on on their website. In addition to that, there's another genomics company (Genetica, which is the largest in Asia or something) and the newly confirmed Meta partnership.
I recommend checking out their website which gives a pretty good rundown for this project.

I might be wrong about this project though as literally 100% of threads on it in the past weeks have been fud and hate threads hahaha. Anyway, I'm checking out from this thread, have a nice day/night anon.

>>50612967
You understand it. The next thing you need to understand is Meta and Google are well aware of what they need to do to survive the oncoming changes web3 is bringing.

If they don't adapt, they will die. They literally need to hand privacy back to people to survive. If they accept this, they'll be able to make more ad revenue than ever before because people will be WAY more likely to allow them to use highly specific data to target them if those people have 100% assurances that the data is kept private.

For these companies privacy vs. no privacy is irrelevant. It's simply how do they make the most money. As we see this shift, that will be by embracing privacy. This unironically opens up billions if not trillions in revenue opportunity for them.

????????? this is old as fck news

>>50615046
Not really. They announced the partnership a while back, but now they're giving actual details. Considering the fact that Meta had dropped a lot of their crypto partnerships, this is big news since Oasis is still onboard.

whats the easiest way to buy oasis now without going cex?

>>50614356
makes sense and i hope you're right. but its never been entirely about the money. we're in a surveillance state that relies on the cooperation of big tech. if big tech embraces privacy for money does that leave the five eyes blind? they wont take that laying down. if they have to bribe or threaten big tech to keep the private data flowing they will.

but at this point we're still far from a level of adoption that would threaten the surveillance state and plenty of upside before we get there even from partial adoption.

>>50612600
https://www.oasislabs.com/distributed-network
>Oasis Labs’ products are built on top of the Oasis Network, a distributed network with the goal of supporting privacy focused applications and use cases.
The partnership with Meta is an Oasis Labs' product, therefore it uses the Oasis Network.

>>50610874
>users on Instagram to take a survey
HOLY SHIT APEING IN MY LIFE SAVINGS AS WE SPEAK

bloomberg article about oasis and instagram
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-28/instagram-launches-survey-to-study-race-and-improve-user-experience

>>50616255
I can already see an easy loophole
the AI computation generates ads based on responses (which META doesn't know)

Now as META you just make them run an ad computation that basically spells out their responses
>person x needs an ad about KFC
>question was what is your ethnicity

META now has the supposedly private data of the poll. Normies will eat it up.