/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50440637
You don't. Nobody is going to accept rolling blackouts or eating less meat or anything so we will just keep overdoing it until we all go extinct.
Like those bacteria that breed exponentially in petri dishes and then all die very, very quickly.
Just count yourself lucky you got to see humanity somewhere near "the top", even if it doesn't feel that way at all.

long fetal alcohol syndrome research

>>50440643
Are you telling me there are anons out there who don’t follow 4chan hivemind, anon?

>>50440637
gmo research companies.
lots of farmland spread out over wide geogrpahic area.

>>50440637
Green economy

>>50440666
>666
Lucifer's crime was thinking for himself.

>>50440731
sounds very liberal

>>50440643
>You don't.
Absolutely correct, climate change is bearish. Everyone loses in this environment, we aren’t going extinct though. There will be a massive population decline however.

>>50440637
diversify your energy and renewables

>>50440637
Sell bullshit products that are "Good for the environment"

>>50440637
Stake farm land for carbon credits

Invest in a sustainability index

>>50440637
Literally do what Greta's doing.

You profit from this the same way fearmongers provide from terrorizing people saying everything you eat gonna kill you, you become an influential person and start getting money selling books or being invited to talks.

You profit from this the same way fearmongers profit: terrorizing people. Saying everything you eat gonna kill you, the world is going to end, you become an influential person and start getting money selling books or being invited to talks.

>>50440637
>HOW DO I PROFIT FROM CLIMATE CHANGE
HOW DARE YOU

>>50440637
> some liberal costal city is going under water in 70 years im gooooing insaaaaane!

>>50440637
Buy frozen tundra in Russia or Canada and wait a few thousand years for it to melt into almost arable land.

>>50441540
she doesnt even do anything though kek

>>50440637
Can you imagine someone funding a movement to blackball scientific critique or challenging of global warming/climate change? Why would they do that?

>>50441540
Get funded by George Soros and to basically do nothing? Pretty good life.

>>50440637
Theres 2 paths. You either go the morally good route and demonize plastics while promote/push actually sustainable products like reusable metal and glass, or you go pure evil and invest in bullshit carbon credits.

>>50440643
>climate change is totally real and not just a scam to sell unless renewable energy (but not nuclear because nuclear bad and unsafe :^) )

>>50444248
Climate change is real and yes it's also a scam to profit off renewables that at best will allow us to keep using oil a little longer. Nuclear isn't bad or unsafe, but it is massively energy inefficient and not capable of replacing oil any more than "green soultions"

>>50440637
long AC units

>>50440637
>Buy wastewater treatment stocks
>Avoid bug food stocks, it simply isn't going to happen, do buy into some GMO shit.
>Avoid any real estate stock primarily own golf courses/parks/theme parks
>Learn spanish
>Get set up in the bottom tip of south America (Argentina/Chile) and start buying farmland
>Have capital ready for when land in Antarctica goes up for grabs. IGNORE ANY AND ALL FUD AND BUY LAND IN ANTARCTICA, BUY AS MUCH AS YOU CAN.

>>50444295
Climate change has been real since forever. Anthropogenic climate change is a laughable joke yet they sold it to us, along with moon landings and 19 arabs with box knives and never ending experimental injections and all manner of horseshit. Consider it all a test. If you buy it you have failed.

There is always some pie in the sky, distance doomsday apocalypse meme to trick green/environmentalist types into handing over money and power to various interest groups, and the government. It was global cooling then the ozone layer and the Amazon then global warming but that wasn't broad and hazy enough so they renamed it "climate change", don't be a retard. The Earth isn't predictable, we saw a spike in temperature because the human population went from 1 billion to 6 billion in one short century, but that flatlined, as will their temp readings.

This is the equivalent of seeing a stock have a big 10% rise in one day and assuming off of that one derivative that it's going to continue forever.

>>50444295
>Nuclear is inefficient
All of the real obstacles to Nuclear fulfilling the vast majority of our energy needs are regulatory, not technical.

>>50444295
The gall to call nuclear inefficient when compared to solar or wind is impressive. I wouldn't dare be that ridiculous myself.

taint cooling mobile service

>>50446209
Nobody said anything good about wind or solar. They’re all shit. People seriously don’t understand the power of oil. We’ve essentially tapped into billions of years of organic energy deposited in the Earth’s crust and we wonder why it’s fucking everything up. People used to travel for days to get to the next city. Imagine pushing your car by hand 30 miles. Now imagine hiring people to do it. How much would it cost in time and money? Now compare that to a gallon of oil which can do that for you in 20 minutes and cost you $2.40 at current prices.

>>50446209
uranium nuclear reactors are amazingly energy efficient, for the single pellet replacing something like tons of coal
there is the whole "muh only 0.5% of the fuel is converted" that's inefficient, but that's materially inefficient not energy inefficient
but those fast breed high-pressure water generation 1 uranium reactors are retarded
current tech is slow breed low-pressure molten salt reactors that don't go fukashima, since built in safety of the molten salt melting a salt plug that automatically ends the reaction when it gets too hot, so no bullshit of having to have constant power to pump water to prevent it all from fucking up
nuclear is the future and it's so goddamn retarded how unaware of new technology people are about it

>>50446209
The entire meme of progress is based on this. The entire monetary system of perpetual growth. It’s a mythology baked into our very existence since Europeans expanded out to other continents and started extracting wealth from them (not moralising). India was the richest country in the world in 1600 for context, by 1950 it was one of the poorest. After an entire industrial revolution and at the height of the age of oil, the US had to use almost 20% of it’s GDP to get us to land on the moon. We are literally never going to Mars let alone “conquering the stars”. Zoomers’ grandchildren will either know how to cobble shoes and draw well water or die.

>NOOOOOOOOOO WE CAN'T HAVE CARBON IN THE ATMOSPHERE
yet all that carbon underground originally came from the atmosphere itself way back when
if anything we're just returning it to where it was
there's been dozens of ice ages, some literally the entire planet minus a narrow strip near the equator that was literally covered with permafrost
the sun has orders of magnitude more impact on the temperature than anything
most people are retarded and easily led

>>50440742
Maybe, but when governments start treating climate change like full war economy level seriousness... They're going to probably nationalize all green tech stuff idk lol.