/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50421073
Imagine trying to tolerate a conversation with either of them.

>>50421092
I would speak with only my dick. I don't care about what they have to say

>>50421092
Imagine wanting to have conversation with women instead of just using them like the cum dumpsters they are

>>50421102
Sorry fantasy nerd.
You MUST talk to any woman to bed her. Usually for hours unless she is being paid.
I'd sooner kms.

>>50421073
imagine cooming in the valley between those two titties

>>50421109
Another "never had a woman" nerd.
Inevitably these women will be around you. There is no scenario except literal whores that is otherwise.
Some man has to tolerate these women.
It's NEVER worth it.
Men that can't get women imagine that it is, but it's not.

>>50421073
what does boob to boob touching feel like?

>>50421092
No women are actually good conversation

>>50421125
Found the guy that's a horrible conversationalist.

>>50421121
if a woman likes you enough, trust me she's gonna talk your head off. convo is no problem at all. she doesn't just like you....yet

>>50421162
This, a woman who likes you/is into you will talk to you about anything, she will open herself up to you like a clam. Lose her desire, and she'll engage NPC mode 9 times out of 10.

>>50421073
I wonder if their nipples got erect.

>>50421073
I do think we might have some more adoption. new people always enter the space in the wake of a bull run. fomo is the biggest converter

>>50421193
why don't you ask 'em?

>>50421193
That's likely the case, just like your dick.

>>50421073
my assets are in the red and I'm just trying to navigate each day

>>50421308
even fundamental projects are bleeding heavily while the market as a whole is down. You better start staking or dcaing

>>50421379
yeah staking and dca works. I used to stake on binance. but their apys are not that great.

>>50421443
Well, it's pretty secured but i think XPRESS and UTK has better apy. I get hihger apy staking on those platform

>>50421092
It’s the same as having a conversation with your average normie. Just nod your head and give the correct corporate responses until you get what you want.

>>50421443
if the apy is "great" it's a scam. simple as.

>>50421683
It depends on the angle you looking at it from.
I believe the next big thing will be centered around payment projects

>>50421231
Fomo and cry in your sleep. Fundamentals now anon. They are kicking in.

>>50421092
Just have fun dude, don't take them seriously.

>>50421683
try getting 6% apy on bnb where some projects yield as high as 48% for their native tokens. it's not a scam, CZ is just a stingy chink.

>>50421768
It will if only the industry embraces wide adoption it desires. But I don't see it rolling out now.

>>50421768
reason why is very simple. we would be seeing greater adoption in addition to using crypto as a payment method. I'm closely following UTK, Xpress and COTI

>>50421844
it is already happening. that is why the race for the best payment gateways is on.

>>50421531
Apy without real use case is shit dude. When will you plebs learn the difference?

>>50421805
They're innovating fast, and I believe that the cryptocard and its metaverse banking feature will be an addition

>>50421073
>OMG SO MANY PONZI PROJECTS THAT HAVE 0 VALUE OTHER THAN BEING FUNNY DOG MEME
We have a LOT further to fall frfr nocap

>>50421805
Xpress apy is 48% dynamic. you're right binance offers the least apy for a project they own. probably because bnb has become so valuable or something

>>50421882
watching and waiting. but projects that build so many things at once are annoying. like focus on one thing!

>>50421844
Since it's lower market cap, I've seen it all and know what to expect from it in the next circle. Then, let's see what happens

>>50421850
Well said anon, i think these projects look fundamentally solid ahead

>>50421850
Payments with cards or what anon? You must have missed the coming regulation news.

>>50421879
Well, i believe they stand out when it comes to real life utilities, their utility token are used for payment also

>>50421962
these seem to have been around for a while. I'm assuming the next bull run would push them mainstream

>>50421965
it's inevitable. very soon crypto usage as a payment method would become a norm. that's why the regulation is important

>>50422001
What about the metaverse bank anon? Any news about that?

Literally less adoption now than in 2017 when there were food stalls and Amazon accepting payment in BTC and LTC. I've accepted it's all a massive ponzi/GTT but there's still money to be made off plebs.

>>50421865
I doubt if there is much competition in this aspect. Some even work in tandem with others to archive some desired outreach of their service.

>>50421092
It's like /biz/ with crypto and video games, but instead it's family/friends and gossip.

>>50421092
I actually enjoy talking to stupid women though, it's much more entertaining than talking to 'smart ones', they're more likely to have an original thought in their head.

>>50422073
Nope, metaverse is relatively in its early stages. Any investment in it right now is a good one.

>>50421124

Like two bags of sand

>>50422039
And you think sec won't fuck all that up? Wake up anon. It's coming.

>>50421654
>why hello there, niggers. I see you both have nice titties. May I fuck them?