/biz/ - Business & Finance

the SAT pair makes me diamonds

Monty is a scammer.

>>50378755
scams can still pump. if this was a widely known scam why would trades to be willing to trade BTC at higher rates for it?

>>50378775
why would *traders* be willing to trade BTC at higher rates for it?

>>50378775
>scams can still
/thread OP is a retard

>>50378729
>checks volume on the 'exchange'
>inhales
>PAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>looks closer
>NMKR
>the volume on LCX
>inhales for longer
>throws head back
>PAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>50380430
if LCX serves institutional clients via OTC, would these volumes be public to cmc/coingecko? genuine question. it smells like a scam but the BTC looks like a golden ticket.

>>50380781
BTC pair*

>>50380781
Dude no one is doing OTC on fucking LCX of all places when they can just go to binance, ftx, Gemini, etc etc

You guys pick the scammiest most retarded and most of all dead projects for some reason holy shit get it together

>>50380818
what about countries in europe that hate all the firms you mentioned? doesn't LCX only serve EU institutional clients? im looking for legitimate fud and nobody is serving. nothing is stopping me from salivating over that SAT pair.

>>50380920
Nigger you get your ass handed to you every time you post, stop positing here or sell your bags

>>50381148
imagine not trusting a SAT pair after everything youve seen over the last 5 years. NGMI

>>50378729
>convince me to not sell everything i own and go all in on LCX
XCM exists.

>>50381192
>imagine not buying into a literal shit (as in indian shit) coin because price went up

>>50381192
Bottom line it’s an ok bet especially if they get staking up this year and profit from European law restricting use of other cex etc. On the fud side there’s the fact that Monty really employs pajeets and it shows so much, and he keeps going on about his Tiamonds that really nobody cares about. It’s a risky bet but if they get their shit together and the wind turns in the favour of LCX, could be great to buy at these prices.

>>50381327
>>50253539

>>50378729
It's your gem bruv, you choose to sell or buy more.

>>50378738
Now that the chart looks more like it, if this token has solid utilities and is building massively like Sylo, which will soon be listed on Coinbase, thereby causing a positive price movement, of which I'm most definitely part of, then why not give it a big buy?

>>50381236
Well well anon should definitely diversify funds.

>>50381327
>Monty is either a scammer or the absolutely most retarded CEO of all time. Everything he does fails. His team is all Pajeets. He's a rich idiot who almost certainly was born into money and now LARPs as a businessman. If you buy LCX expecting them to make a functional crypto exchange, you're delusional.

> There's a small cult of personality forming around Monty bc he wears nice suits and has lots of money. I think that's mainly what's going on. Also, most people are clueless as to how BAD it is to have your entire exchange built in house by Pajeets who make (we found this out) 8k USD a year! 8k USD! For creating the next gen crypto exchange. Fucking comical

why does LCX fud remind me of pastas from the 2017 run. digits says LCX goes the way of BNB

>>50381603
>fud
> remind me 2017
>digits
you should kill yourself

>>50381628
i grabbed a 100k bag at 6.1 just in case. your fud fuels me.

>>50381701
Invest more you fucking poorfag, buy 1 Million lcx, all I read from your post is "I'm going to pay 6k tax for being a low I IQ idiot". Go all in retard

>>50380920
Anons are always talking about this exchange like it's something special because it complies with some Lux or Liechtenstein or wherever the fuck it is laws, as if that means anything. There are no EU regulations on crypto exchanges - they can't passport their services into another EU country just because they comply with laws in one country that don't apply in any others. If/when the EU implement regulation then exchanges like Binance, Coinbase and FTX will just comply with it, simple as that.