/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50299494
>gaming and social applications
So some useless shit

>>50299494
Shame they never ended up using LINK nodes as validators, would have been great for us linkies. Oh well, maybe next time!

>>50299501
Here's your (you).

>>50299494
>The key technical differentiator is that whereas Arbitrum One puts all transaction data on Ethereum all the time, Nova makes use of a data availability committee. In doing so, Nova achieves significant cost savings by first sending the data to the committee and only falls back to putting data on-chain if the committee fails to do its job.
Link bros

>>50299538
>Firstly, with Arbitrum Nova there is now a minimal trust assumption added to the process of handling transaction data — specifically an assumption that at least two committee members are honest. Instead of the sequencer batching and posting all calldata to L1, it shares data with the committee.
Mev on suicide watch. No linkers are seething.

>>50299494
umm honeychads? phat bros?? shitposting aside any arbitrum bros left should join the tg /dotlol

>>50299538
>>50299553
Nowhere is LINK mentioned man. I hold 10k LINK and even I'm not falling for this copium.

>>50299501
they do you stupid fucking nigger

>>50299624
If they did LINK's price would have elevated from it. We're down 90% against ETH my dude.

>>50299538
wow i wonder who the committee is

where is the on chain evidence of chainlink nodes working for arbitrum in any capacity?
why would I care about arbitrum? the eth team lied about scaling being a significant roadblock to adoption. truth is mev is why eth is number two
vitalik and the long haired mev mafia laugh at arbitrum because they know that if mev is removed eth rapidly loses value

>>50299666
>satanic digits
>that filename
truly pathetic kys

>>50299618
>He doesn't know

>>50299704
no one does man but what has been confirmed is ed felten using linkies for free marketing while I get nothing in return for my efforts
dont like it? too fucking bad kill yourself nigger

>>50299798
>He doesn't know about the million link with the same number on multiple addresses
Also we've known for a long time.

>>50299914
>a bunch of link went into different wallets
>its the same amount anon, the exact same amount!
>*insert speculative leap here*
>this means that arbitrum is heavily involved in chainlink and vice versa!!!
and for whatever reason the market does not give a shit about offchain data, cross chain data, scaling ETH, and layer twos in general
scaling eth without mev is problematic because mev gives eth a definitive value extraction proposition which oracles and layer twos do not.

>>50299965
Seething that mev is no longer gonna work also.
>Eth not needed

>>50299494
>>50299501
>>50299914
>>50299642
>we
>us

>>50299992
Eth not needed

>>50299980
no i am seething that ed exploited linkies like me for free marketing. But he did turn me into a full Luddite so wherever possible I will seek to disrupt.

How does that make you feel?

>>50299494
I like Arbitrum but I wish they marketed with the same serious air that Chainlink does. I guess you need the hype to get people interested in an L1.

>>50300048
>ed exploited linkies like me for free
You know that lying is a sin? You're unironically on the path to hell, same with anons who fud for free.

>>50300058
oh no you are the one that is on the path to hell. remember when ed rick rolled the twitter marines and they had a good laugh about it?
remember when all the expectation was on monetary returns for shilling arbitrum just like every other community driven project in crypto?

no one would know about arbitrum if it were not for linkies screeching about mev. I was like that back in the day but now that viable scaling is here and it did not have much of an impact I know with 100% certainty scaling is a meme

>>50300088
>no one would know about arbitrum
>What is off chain labs
Ngmi

>>50300140
>refuses to answer any questions
>ignores everything
>but anon it is a sin to lie
>just trust me
ngmi.marketing should be the new shill factory. without linkies no one would know or care about offchain labs or arbitrum

>>50299642
>If they did LINK's price would have elevated from it.
That's not how speculation works.

>>50300286
this is an arbitrum thread kek why are you talking about chainlink?
>everything is going right with chainlink
celsius and bancor collapsing as soon as chainlink rempved their treasury says otherwise. what other big launch partners do they they even have for ccip now?

>>50300341
>why are you talking about chainlink?
The guy I replied to was talking about Chainlink.

>celsius and bancor collapsing as soon as chainlink rempved their treasury says otherwise
Celsius and Bancor aren't Chainlink.

>>50300357
do you have a web crawler sniffing for chainlink?
bancor and celsius were major ccip launch partners their failure puts chainlink back a few steps. who else is going to be a launch partner now? aave maybe and snz

>>50300382
>do you have a web crawler sniffing for chainlink?
lol no, I opened a thread about Arbitrum because I think scaling is pretty important.

>bancor and celsius were major ccip launch partners their failure puts chainlink back a few steps
All of crypto are major ccip launch partners.

>>50300394
>I think scaling is pretty important.
scaling has nothing to do with chainlink lmao lol even

>All of crypto are major ccip launch partners.
lol sauce?

>>50300408
>scaling has nothing to do with chainlink lmao lol even
I opened an Arbitrum thread because scaling.

>lol sauce?
CCIP is extremely important to all of crypto.

>>50300422
you opened an arbitrum thread to specifically discuss chainlink and it shows because the only posts you have replied to are chainlink related not arbitrum
>CCIP is extremely important to all of crypto.
again lol source?

>>50300422
>CCIP is extremely important to all of crypto
And the banks and all the other real world stuff. The other guy is seething over.link.

Remeber the Nova Automobile.
And why that name was a bad idea.

>>50300440
but this is an arbitrum thread not a chainlink thread and you have failed to establish any technological relationship between the two beyond marketing and random unmarked wallets having the exact same amounts of LINK in them

>>50300439
>you opened an arbitrum thread to specifically discuss chainlink
Holy shit no. Are you retarded or something?
I opened the thread because it's about scaling.

>>CCIP is extremely important to all of crypto.
>again lol source?
Look up what it is, I guess.

>>50300463
my chevy nova lit up the night's sky, fucking based

>>50299501
based

>>50300495
I know you have made great contributions to the thread in terms of discussing arbitrum, congratulations on this, seriously
>Look up what it is, I guess
lol source?

>>50300508
>I know you have made great contributions to the thread in terms of discussing arbitrum, congratulations on this, seriously
Well you can't stop talking about Chainlink to me.

>>50300517
dude I want to talk about chainlink but you have to lol source me

>>50300528
>I want to talk about chainlink
clearly

>>50300535
give me the lol source fren so far we have wallets with the same amount of link in them
>who paid for these LINK?
>did Ed get them for free?
>how does anyone know what these link are for?
amd a whole bunch of arbitrum marketing with not much tech

>>50300564
Source for what?

>>50300573
source on why chainlink would even be mentioned in an arbitrum thread lol source? I dont see the connection

>>50300585
>source on why chainlink would even be mentioned in an arbitrum thread
I didn't mention Chainlink, I replied to someone who did.

>>50300601
so you wouldn't mind giving me the lol source fren

>>50300605
Source for what?

>>50300615
for what you are discussing with me

>>50299494
Are these waters OK?

Why does this guy get such an privileged spot on the smartcon speaker list hmm

>>50300639
Hey man, just popping up to inform you will, in fact, never be a woman. Hope all is well. Have a good one.

>>50300678
lol hey man but can you give me a lol source?

>>50300639
I wasn't the one who mentioned Chainlink in an Arbitrum thread.
The guy I replied to was.

Take your fucking meds.

>>50300735
lol can you source that?

>>50300692
I don't even know what you're talking to that guy about, just checked your post count and had a nice laugh.

>>50300752
hey man its you again I like when the thread goes quiet then a new ID pops up you guys need to learn how to change IPs faster kek
but srs can you give me a source lol?

>>50300752
Every thread that even tangentially mentions Link summons a 50 pbtid link fudder.

>>50300774
>people are angry
yes but this is an arbitrum thread and arbitrum has nothing to do with chainlink beyond marketing

some would call me a maniac to post this much
DUDE so are YOU

>>50300788
>this is an arbitrum thread and arbitrum has nothing to do with chainlink
t. 24 pbtid about Chainlink

>>50299501
>using LINK
kek

>>50300820
COULD YOU PLEASE STOP SHOUTING SCHIZO YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PEOPLE ABOUT WHAT THEY WANT AND ALL CHAINLINK POSTS HAVE BEEN REPLIES TO OTHER IDS TALKING ABOUT CHAINLINK

>>50300850
stop talking about chainlink in this is an arbitrum thread ser

la la la la arbitrum lol source

>>50299666
Checked. I too, wonder. *wink wink*

bad thread. looks bad for arbitrum

>>50300851
take your meds schizo

>>50299666
heil satan! christ is dead!

schizos

Something something
Scam FULL STOP

>>50300931
>27pbtid screeching about Chainlink
Go to bed. You're embarrassing yourself and derailing the thread.