/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50164437
Claims to provide interoperability between any network. Has a lot of ties to legacy finance.

It's either one of the most elaborate scams in crypto or a goldmine.

>>50164500
So go all in? That's what you're saying?

IBM on the blockchain
<1000 lines of code on their github repo

>>50164511
Should at least be part of your portfolio in case it's not a scam and can deliver.

Ref flags for me are no working product so far, little hard metrics on transaction fees / token utility. The token is fundamental for their services though and supply is 14m, so mcap increas translates into lots of price appreciation.

I will buy some at some point.

>>50164437
Armenian family scam

>>50164437
LatAm digital dollar. There's a possibility that this becomes the TCP/IP of the new financial system.

If you are into glowie coins and ISO 2022 you should have this.

>>50164542
It's proprietary software you idiot.

What you see on GitHub is the SDKs.

Overledger connects enterprises using DLT with each other across networks. It also connects TradFi to crypto.

It's not crypto to crypto interoperability. It's a goldmine.

>>50164673
why would a TradFi company pay Quant to use their shitty middleware when they can directly use open source blockchain frameworks like many corpos are doing already?

>it's a goldmine!
>Husband, Wife, Brother family scam
>Gagik Alaverdian, President Americas at Quant Advance Computer Care Inc, Previous experience his own Computer Repair shop
>https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/glendale/profile/computer-repair/advance-computer-care-inc-1216-528119
>Peter Marirosans - Chief Technology Officer of Quant (previous experience a company with 1 employee)
>Chief Technology Officer Company - MAYFOURTH HOLDINGS LIMITED (past 3 years) 1 Linkedin employee KEK
>https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/glendale/profile/computer-repair/advance-computer-care-inc-1216-528119
>countless scams are associated with this quant address which is just a mail forwarding service address
>https://www.google.com/search?q=20-22+Wenlock+Road+address+scam&oq=20-22+Wenlock+Road+address+scam
>Quant Network achieved Technology Partner status with Amazon’s AWS Partner Network (APN). A move that will enable more than a million active customers to benefit from our Overledger blockchain operating system
>https://aws.amazon.com/partners/find/results/?keyword=Quant%20Network&size=10&start=0&sort=Relevance&view=Grid (no product, now removed from AWS)
>https://medium.com/@quant_network/quant-world-f13f3cd9f317

>>50164735
You mean the shitty Hyperledger projects?

https://twitter.com/JustATechGuy_/status/1541018265539039233

>>50164759
Weak fud

You think the Financial Conduct Authority would collaborate with a scam to create a new digital asset regulatory framework?

>>50164805
they have not "collaborated" you lying shill
>weak fud
debunk it then, incompetent pajeet

>>50164562
>i will buy some at some point
yeah when they have a transparent product that can be audited or at least used by the public.

they also have ties to the british gov and their business model is extremely exclusive fwik. it all sounds a bit hard to evaluate. i dont understand how they can expect retail to be onboard. maybe thats the point.

>>50164815
nah stay poor incel

>>50164854
You can use Overledger with testnet blockchains for free on the developer portal.

it's a scam vaporware

>>50164881
im sure you can do all sorts of stuff but testnet and production are entirely different, check solana. also where is the code? who runs the validators? who are the customers? what is the token distribution?

im am honestly sure this project will do well in the background and make the owners very wealthy but for me it is an unknown that this will translate into meaningful price appreciation due to how secretive they are. look at what happened to hedera and ICP.

>>50164437
According to this faggot on youtube, QNT will be going to 300 trillion per coin in 2 weeks.
https://youtu.be/It8e2Dzxprg

Its a shit ERC-20 coin. That will do extremely well and my 3rd biggest holding.

>>50164995
It's not a blockchain itself. It's proprietary and patented middleware. It's all institutional DLT adoption. Crypto is niche compared to all companies re architecting their business networks on permissioned DLTs.

Europe's biggest financial infrastructure provider that also builds ECB's ESMIG/RTGS is using Overledger for their new DLT based network called SIAChain. Company is called Nexi now after the huge merger between SIA, Nexi and Nets.

QNT is the key to your future.
>working on the Latin American cbdc (live in 2023)
>on the British digital pound foundation
>Partnered with MIT and SIA
>US government expressed interest in working with then.

>>50165832
They're literally building the holy grail with MIT.

"Now, I think that what they really mean in this case is not interoperability, but integration. Can a chaincode in Hyperledger Fabric call out to post a transaction on another blockchain, such as Ethereum or Bitcoin? Of course. Now, do we need something like the Interledger Protocol (ILP) crypto-graphic conditions to ensure that they either both happen or neither? Yes, but this is not necessarily interoperability in my book, it is a connector that presumes that the artifact being exchanged is the same on either side (a payment).
To achieve true inter-platform interoperability the likes of which I suspect some seek, would require developing the “one API/protocol to rule them all” and getting every platform to adopt that, consistently. Even if we could, it would be years in the making. There be dragons."

https://www.ibm.com/blogs/blockchain/2018/10/blockchain-interoperability-i-do-not-think-it-means-what-you-think-it-means/

This is that protocol. To implement it you can build your own API Gateway but it would be very hard to replicate Overledger yourself with the patents in place. Just buy a license or run a limited scale custom implementation and migrate to Overledger once you reach a scale to complex to handle yourself.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-hardjono-secure-asset-transfer-protocol/07/

>>50164735

look i'm feeling nice so i'll tell you

'crypto' in this context is every L1.
so what they are saying when they say it connects tradefi is that it allow tradfi to use whichever blockchain they need to for that single transaction rather than be stuck with all their transactions on one blockchain.

>>50164437

Pump and dump that's already had its run. Bagholders claim that QNT is the holy grail but literally have no data to back it up. Claim massive integrations with banks, governments, no evidence on chain.

Recently the QNT twitter has blocked all replies from anybody its not following. QNT telegrams kick you for asking questions about the gateways that were due a year ago.

The project for all intents and purposes is dead and is just a money machine for Gilbert at this point.

>>50166016
crypto is not even their main focus, they're about connecting enterprises in business consortiums that each run a different DLT. They don't want to use an intermediary blockchain network for that. They want direct communication with said enterprise through an API Gateway.

https://twitter.com/SanNL11/status/1525113799296032773

>>50166062
u mad?

https://www.ledgerinsights.com/sia-integrates-quants-overledger-for-blockchain-interoperability/

>>50165123
>patented middleware
oh look another hbar!

>>50166097
>https://www.ledgerinsights.com/sia-integrates-quants-overledger-for-blockchain-interoperability/

QNT niggers are so retarded all they can do when confronted with a lack of data is post articles from 2 years ago. Nigger, REQ bagholders can post better crumbs than this, and look at them.

It's simple. QNT runs on Gateways. If QNT has half the integration they claim to have, you would have data coming out of your ears. Not only do you NOT have any data (it doesn't exist), the ceo tells you blatantly to stop asking for it.

Next you'll post an article from a year ago from Oracle. Again, not showing any actual evidence that QNT is being used.

On the contrary, I can show you matter of factly the only people trading this shitcoin are market makers.

>>50166224
Nice fud bro,kinda spergy but halfway decent atleast

>>50166224
>>50166097
>>50164500
>>50164437
So here is the basic truth. Interop is very cool. But cross chain interop is a dead end due to security problems that are inherent to the chains you want to interop from and to.
Futhermore, now you also have lots of competition, it's not just QNT anymore, now it's LINK with their CCIP and Layer Zero with their impressive paper on how to do it without oracles. Which is better than link and quant.

I still think the idea is retarded. Interop to legacy systems is a good idea though, maybe those systems can gain some market share. I highly doubt it will result in token growth.

On a side note, a year ago when I was still researching I asked about CCIP in the main quant telegram and got called fudder by multiple people and then insta banned.

>>50166266
CCIP is for Crypto to Crypto.

Quant is for Enterprise to Enterprise across consortiums.

Not even comparable.

>>50166315
In that case quant sounds like a good idea, back when I looked into it, it claimed to do crypto to crypto. Did that change? Do you have a source that claims they do not want to go down that route anymore

>>50166097
Neat. Can you tell me what this does? What is it doing right now?

>>50166339
It was simply the community not understanding the tech. They still do crypto to crypto for enterprises, but that's not DeFi.

Check the USDC private bridge from Circle. They burn and mint tokens through a centralized API. Something Overledger could've facilitated.

So it's all from an enterprise POV. Permissioned to Permissioned but also Permissioned to Crypto.

DeFi would be CCIP, Flare, ICX, DAG etc.

Quant is partnered with Constellation/DAG, so as you can see they are not facilitating that kind of interoperability. They're connecting enterprise with innovative public dApps and marketplaces.

You'd be able to trade TradFi's assets on P2P markets.


>>50166359
They've been busy with Latin America, https://quant.network/use-cases/transforming-cross-border-payments-in-latin-america/

Oracle also relies on Quant to provide DLT interoperability for their clients using Oracle Blockchain Platform. They've certified the technology, no other crypto has ever done that.

I remember when QNT was the same price as LINK in 2019/2020 and a few anons were shilling it relentlessly every single day back then. From single digits to triple digits.

I sincerely hope those anons made it

>>50166455
LACchain is a literal nothingburger and is being used to grift users.

Where are the gateways that were promised LAST YEAR?

You don't have them, I know. Give us ONE update on gateways since then?

You don't have it, I know. Give us SOME data showing people are using gateways, since the team seems hellbent on convincing people that they are in use.

You don't have it, I know.

>>50164500
they have no liquidity available
liquidity is EVERYTHING as we’ve seen in the recent days

There are way better projects like BitDAO that are actually decentralized and have a ton of liquidity backed by the largest treasury in the market

>>50164437
Don't listen to the fud. Get some Quant in your portfolio.
I got over 3000

>>50164437
Oracle pump and dump. People weren't buying chainlink so they pumped QNT from 10 to 400$ then dumped on tards
>token not needed

>>50166573
I-I-its over bros working on the Latin American digital dollar is a literal n-nothingburger......are you a functional retard ?

>>50167038
>Latin American digital dollar
You obviously have no idea what LAC actually is. You just exposed yourself.

Furthermore, where are the gateways, nigger? Where are the updates? Where is the proof that anything is being done onchain? Quit trying to change the subject.

>>50166455
That's another problem with QNT, they partner with provable scam projects and this makes me think the people behind it are better at larping than actually doing that they are supposed to.

DAG is a total joke, the fact that no one over at QNT figured this out speaks volumes

>>50166339
>Did that change?

QNT exists in a state where it's capable of doing everything depending on the bagholder you are talking too.

In reality, it does nothing. SNX, LINK, etc. everybody can show the metrics from their network in use. Where is QNT's? Can a QNT bagholder show us ANYTHING other than a year old article?

They can't. Sad!

Not sure if I make this clear enough in this post >>50167112

If the coins I held were to do ANYTHING with constellation dag, I would INSTANTLY sell.
It's an actual scam and even talking to them or considering them anything other than a scam ruins any trust I would have in QNT

>>50167077
Latin America and the carribeans lil conglomerate on blockchain?

It's simple,they got scrapped you fool.You see the unfortunate truth is the majority of crypto holders are emotionally incontinent, they see a cancellationaand start reeing.The moonboys around QNT ate a fucking disgrace, can you fathom how embarrassing it must be ?Of course you can't because your spending your time fudding on /biz/

Updates like the Integration of XDC ?
Define Onchain? QNT isn't a blockchain, so the transaction through QNT would just be on other blockchains?What do you meed each transaction to have a special little sticker on it just to validate you?

XDC is also a scam on pair with DAG
And don't let me get started on fucking LCX or ICX my god

>>50167303
You're a fucking brainlet lmao.
Have fun staying poor with your incel cryptos.

>>50167260
>Define Onchain? QNT isn't a blockchain, so the transaction through QNT would just be on other blockchains?What do you meed each transaction to have a special little sticker on it just to validate you?

Galaxy-level cope. You ask for some sort of backend dashboard, QNT bagholding niggers act like you're asking for HTML source code. You ask for metrics on chain showing use, they pretend like these aren't immutable ledgers that record every transaction. You are either coping or you are so low IQ that you really don't understand how these things works at a technical level.

I'll make it very simple for you low IQ QNT niggers: If Gateways are in use (which every QNT nigger claims is the case) then there would be something to show for it. You can't just pretend there isn't data to be shown, because this is another promise the team keeps making to the community, that dashboard with metrics will be coming *eventually* (this was promised over a year ago, no updates)

You have nothing to show for it. Put 2 and 2 together.

>>50167303
What makes you so confident those are scams?

>>50166266
>On a side note, a year ago when I was still researching I asked about CCIP in the main quant telegram and got called fudder by multiple people and then insta banned.

This is why QNT niggers act so entitled until they are in an environment where they can be questioned, and then they completely fall apart.

The telegrams will ban you for any questions. The QNT twitter accounts dont even allow for replies anymore unless they follow you. QNT is the most echo-chambered crypto community online right now and when they are confronted they can't handle it.

>>50164437
QNT promises to bring interoperability and real world solutions at low cost to institutions. This is one of the reasons why they are partnered with Allianceblock.... But don't know whether they really offer this ...

>>50166016
Nice one anon this really looks great,These Web3 L1 payments tech wizards enable fast crypto transactions at lower fees to allow merchants to reach a large audience of crypto holders, am sure it freaky horny already

>>50164500
I would still prefer the secret network blockchain over this stupid blockchain.

>>50167622
Simple limitations of blockchain architecture contrasted against the claims they make. For example If you claim to scale while using a fucking single chain DAG then my guy, you are a scam artist. This is first and foremost, not taking into account that ConstallationDAG literally worked, WORKED, with a known pump and dump group, as in, they had the guys on their team and website but removed them after they did their pump and dump. ICX is 2017 era vaporware and LCX is a complete joke, barely a company just a really dumb founder that paid for a pre made exchange. The fact that QNT even considered them and then even partnered with them should scare the shit out of you.
>>50167365
>You're a fucking brainlet lmao.
I am right.

>>50167720
your horny ass needs to be spanked,
>>50167753
I would have rated monero better but they don't have nft support

oh and XDC is pure nonsense tech with a paid twitter shill army to make it seem like there is demand behind it, Tron tier dogshit

>>50166541
Just as the best is to understand some shit before you fucked into it

>>50167807
>Just as the best is to understand some shit before you fucked into it

>>50166339
It's never a good idea gypsy, because they aren't making the interoperability happen as they said which is a key to DeFi going mainstream..

Instead you see Cosmos, Link, Albt etc bringing the actual interoperability through their products... QNT failed us...

>>50167853
>Instead you see Cosmos, Link, Albt etc bringing the actual interoperability through their products... QNT failed us...

For what it's worth, I do think QNT was a legit project once upon a time. The oracle connection 3 years ago was legit. Nothing has happened since, competitors have popped up, and it seems that QNT has gave up on being competitive. Radio silence on gateways for over 7 months for something that was supposed to launch last year begs a lot of questions. Why did they think they would be ready last year? Why weren't they? Why are they not ready more than half a year later?

This doesn't happen for "no" reason.

>>50167365
This is why so many of them remain poor
>>50167801
This is what I agree
>>50167753
still hiring agents, fuck lol

>>50167795
NFTs bridging and support in DeFi is a new development... Using it as a criteria this early seems foolish..

>2022
>QNT threads STILL make biz sperg out
It’s been four years of this, amazing how things stay the same

>>50167896
>Radio silence on gateways for over 7 months for something that was supposed to launch last year begs a lot of questions.

I have more questions for the QNT team. I don't think they have plans at all. They just decided to attach themselves to an interesting USP of interoperability in DeFi. I'm disappointed with my time, investment and everything QNT. The only thing I benefitted from them is getting to know ALBT after their partnership...

QNT CEO is a product of Cum...

>>50167622
>>what's your safe heaven dick head,The rate at which businesses are integrating the web3 payments platform is rapidly increasing, signalling a powerful shift towards Web3 technologies that bring additional growth potential for merchants everywhere.

https://quant.network/people/guy-dietrich/

>Guy Dietrich is a Managing Director at Rockefeller Capital Management.

>>50168057
Glorious ain't it

>>50165054
Yea this shit got some right direction,but during this bearish season The realestate industry, it's getting some renovations done, all thanks to digitalcurrencies. Investments in housing developments are being democratized and multimillion dollar homes are being paid for with BTC EGLD UTK USDT USDC etc .

>>50168183
>https://quant.network/people/guy-dietrich/

Oh wow with a big wig like that surely there is some heavily vetted data showing the usage of the system.

Let's see it.

>>50168183
>is responsible for advising
oh god

Anyone have the pic of Gilbert getting scammed by pajeets for an exchange listing kek

>>50169769
nah but I got this one which is funny

QNT fact: it is actually pronounced 'cunt'.

>>50164437
>Claims to provide interoperability between any network.
I'll rather stick to Polkadot

>>50166016
>'crypto' in this context is every L1.
Good point. The native security that comes with protocols built on L1 is vital. Probably one of the reasons why Railgun stands out among several other privacy enabling solutions.

>>50166620
>liquidity is EVERYTHING
No moron. UTILITY is everything

>>50170303
No dipshits, SECURITY is everything.

>>50167753
Actually, privacy is gaining more relevance ahead of interoperability these days

>>50165832
>latin america
>foundation
>partnered
>expressed interessed

... anon

>>50170320
>Privacy is vital to Security
I wonder how it is difficult to understand that privacy and security are not mutually exclusive. If you leave your ass all exposed without privacy measures, it won't take much time before you'll become a hack target.

>>50170533
kys jeet bot

>>50164437
Quant, quant, quant. Like the sound of one bird that's housed in a pool. So many out there you don't actually know what to get unless you do some research. Cosmos IBC gems are very important to ape in if it is a must in this bear market crash so atom scrt and osmo have been big enough in my portfolio

>>50170320
Utility is like a fucking matrix. It's all interconnected

>>50170403
QNT niggers really think this is convincing.

>>50170562
No cap, retard.

>>50167795
NFT support is not very common to most of them

>>50170587
Tell that to the whores. Maybe they'll get the message better

>>50170533
Put some respekt to privacy coins or get some rekt, jeets

>>50170608
That's not going to be convincing. What exactly is the problem it's solving out there?

>>50170270
Railgun? Last time I checked, it's a subset of the gigantic secret ecosystem

>>50167303
>XDC is also a scam on pair with DAG
i'm not surprised, Bitcoin was once called a scam, and this won't make me to sell my bag, I remember a friend warning me against buying Ride when I bought, i'm still waiting for the first regret on both, except the current dip that's affecting the whole market.

>>50164759
This. Big red flags all round. If it wasn't for the gateway hype starting last year Quant would be sub $10 where it belongs. Trash scam coin. Gilbert is a slimy computer repair shop scam artist.

>>50164437
Quant? Quantum resistant Blockchain related?? Wtf is QUANT? Never heard of this shit before.

>>50170141
It's not targeted to you lol.
ENTERPRISES. Not one enterprise will send their precious TradFi assets over Polkadot.

>>50170792
>NFT
Goddamn NFT creators are lucky to earn passive income through the royalties they’ve received from their content and a low transaction fees have been offered by an L1 hybrid quantum resistant Blockchain which motherfuckers can predict.

>>50171175
Now pajeets can't afford BTC

>>50171895
Sit and watch how morons will enjoy the rapid cloud deployment when installing the private blockchain, where they can cut their deployment time by 80 percent compared to the industry average

>>50170141
Lol shit project.

>>50170270
>The native security that comes with protocols built on L1 is vital
L1 security seems to be the top notch ATM moment with the emergence of quantum security blockchain, transactions are secured for the future with the quantum-resistant security add-on, getting the shit hole ecosystem prepared for the MainNet launch.

>>50166573
LACC chain is subsidiary of the Inter-American Development Bank to create and develop retail CBDCs for 12 Latin/Caribbean governments
>he doesnt know about the Coinbase custodial wallets
OVN uses QRC-20 wrapped assets on its own ledger so your not going to see a lot of data on etherscan.
>no product
https://quant.network/press-releases/quant-empowers-27-million-developers-to-become-certified-blockchain-experts-2/
Kings College in London has an online cert I'm thinking about taking.

>>50173058
Look at how QNT bagholders will do anything and everything to avoid talking about stats.
>LACC chain
Not nearly as big or as important as you imply. A REQ-tier breadcrumb.
>OVN uses QRC-20 wrapped assets on its own ledger so your not going to see a lot of data on etherscan.
Again, QNT niggers doing everything they can to pretend data doesn't exist. First of all, Gilbert promises the data is coming just like he did gateways, so the idea that these retards take this stance is laughable. Furthermore, no one expects to see the bulk of the data on etherscan, though we would expect to see evidence of transactions happening there. They could still report on licenses, requests, jobs ran, etc.
>kings college training course!
Pitiful.

I just hit QNT bagholder bingo with this single post alone.

Show us the data or shut the fuck up. Everything else is copium from overinvested niggers.

>>50172212
Earning passive income in the space is paramount, I'm staking my SCRT & EVMOS to earn passively

>>50172314
BTC is not the only asset to hold, he can buy the ones he can afford

>>50173793
you're obsessed, get a gf

>>50174255
I know you're not used to getting pushback in your special protected groups so you're upset. Bring proof of usage or shut the fuck up and go back to your quamfy groups where you can post recycled memes all day and no one will care.

>>50174377
Fuck off, they cannot reveal lockups yet as this exposes Quant's enterprise pricing to competition.

You will see the data once Community Treasury launches and merges the two treasuries into one, making enterprise fees opaque.

>>50174444
wasted

>>50173793
>Not nearly as big or as important as you imply. A REQ-tier breadcrumb.
We have legitimate banking institution using OVN to build CBDCs with 12 governments central banks and thats 'not nearly as important as you imply' because GV doesn't email you personally with OVN data from government and enterprise usage? Do you think he can just go on twitter and be like "check out this 100 million dollars we just tokenized for Brazil today'. I swear you must be from one of these 3rd world shitholes thats about to get tokenized. Ever hear of SLAs or NDAs or federal compliance regulations like FedRAMP that would prevent such disclosures? Do those exist in your shithole country? QNT isnt a DAO or opensource project, they are a company and they dont owe you shit.

>>50164437
I know of solid gems like QANX but wtf is this and what Blockchain is it built on anon?

>>50164500
The only token I have seen provide good interoperability features between blockchains is AxlToken and even its partnerships with Fintech company Aevapay depicts that.

>>50164511
I suppose not.

>>50174612
Detailed pointers

Sold because it doesn't exist. I've asked hundreds of times for a simple video of the overledger in use, nobody has one. I get told just sign up and use it bro... Ok, YOU sign up and use it. No? Yeah.

It's vapourware. All Gilbert does is talking about regulatory frameworks, that's it.

>>50172553
I think I have been having a deep flair for what L1s like AZERO are building also in terms of solving blockchain trilemma but in terms of data privacy and security then I think Sylo is making sure the metaverse doesn't become a walled garden.

>>50175398
The Egyptian company by Asser Fawazi?
Good to know something is also coming to Axl borders

>>50174444
>>50173793

>>50170303
Choose your own everything wisely but to me both is everything.

>>50166016
Too bad the token is not needed.

>>50171003
I think the only one I know of is ZKP but those tokens are damn complicated.

>>50170587
Sure thing that's why I think RIDE utilities in terms of making everyone involved in the ecosystem profitable are my pick.