/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50091265
No this will never work. If it did it would mean there is now actual unstoppable privacy on every blockchain. Do you really think WEF scam coin would let that happen?? polcels are literally retarded. ICP IS CENTRALISED YOU LOW IQ WHITETRASH

Dang…. ICP is going to be the new dark net live on your browser….guys WAGMI lock up your piss its going to be a rough year or two

>>50091265
This post was sponsored by Chainalysis

sage was posted in all fields because this is the most retarded thing I've seen since ICP launch.

>>50091265
I SEE PEE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHBHHABAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHABAHAHABAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

This may actually have the potential to be big

>>50091440
dfinity didn't launch this
it's a hackathon project running on the IC using threshold ecdsa

>>50091491
no-one cares nor did anybody ask you fucking jeet tier glowie, stop posting inferior nigger tech and act like it's something good

>>50091524
found the xmr cuck

>>50091491
when sdk for dogecoin so I can launder my ill-gotten wealth via doge for lulz and fu to the authorities?

>>50091294
Make up your mind Sam. Is it a WEF coin that is going to take over, or is it an obscure shit coin that no one cares about? I can't keep up with these mental gymnastics.

>>50091524
you seem very upset about all this

>>50091265
Kek, until druggies start using this XMR is, and will be, undisputed King.

>>50093211
>Kek, until druggies start using this XMR is, and will be, undisputed King.
they wont use something, built on top of something that is built on top of bitcoin, imagine the vectors of attack available to hackers and government agencies, too much bloat for a simple private transaction, xmr provides simple to use private way to move capital, xmr is very hard to replace without a similar unified solution. i would go as far as to imply that as long as xmr is around and being developed none can't compete with it

>>50091265
It sounds like Tornado and Tornado failed as a privacy tool.

https://u.today/tornado-cash-mixer-starts-blacklisting-crypto-addresses

How can a so-called privacy tool blacklist addresses?

>>50091265
I mean it isn't much of a contest, Spinner anonymizes txs for any chain whatsoever

>>50091294
I thought it was interesting that Dom took personal interest in the project and asked the dev a few questions himself. Maybe it isn't a WEF scam coin after all

>>50093995
Because their front-end runs on centralized servers, either they blacklist the address or the website gets taken down by Bezos. ICP is a decentralized web server and even though it isn't yet fully decentralized it's definitely getting there.

>>50091320
Except the entire dark web- both front and backend as well as payment processing will be anonymous- and entirely secured by the blockchain.
Maybe Icp is the hero we needed not the one we wanted

>>50093658
It’s not built ‘on top’ of btc. Keep reading keep studying because you sound like an xmr invested retard. And the fact that someone like you has an issue that isn’t addressed by spinner chad or Dfinity is literally insane dunning Krugeresc.

>>50094224
hahahaha enjoy getting scammed again CHUD. do you really think Dominic paid by WEF and SCHWAB will allow you privacy?? hahahahaha. it is so easy taking ur money it's going 2 cents enjoying my short.

>>50094224
you will use your INTERNET IDENTITY to send and receive anonymous transaction lol can't even make this up you are so low iq

>>50095051
>makes new internet ID in literally 1 minute

It's funny watching all the poor 3rd world faggots seethe at ICP because they know it will replace their shitcoin. DO NOT REDEEM SIRS!!!!

>>50095006
It’s the summer of bud chuds so we’re
Going to make it fellow chud bud.

>>50093658
>they wont use something, built on top of something that is built on top of bitcoin

This. You can try all you want to anonymize bitcoin, but the fact that xmr has it all built in by default will always come out on top. Any "bitcoin layer" solution posing as an XMR challenger should be laughed off. XMR only needs to worry if there is another privacy by default coin that offers more anonymity than it, and I don't see that anywhere on the horizon.

>>50095653
let me fud in peace

>>50095777
You're coping so hard rn it's funny hehe

>>50096597
the cope is with the ICP baggies really.

>>50095051
You don't need an internet identity to use spinner XD, SILLY DUMMY

>>50091265
icpee does not add anything new, just a wrapper on btc/eth, lmao this is useless

>>50096653
wrong. in fact it doesn't even wrap btc or eth yet kek

>>50091265
I hold icp but the xmr posts are right, privacy by default reigns supreme, this will the way of tornado cash or even worse a mixer service where everything that interacts with it is flagged by default.
This would only work if icp transactions themselves are private by default, and sadly they are not

>>50096840
it does... anon this chain key cryptography thing is an illusion, that's all. there is no such thing as a container holding a private key yet without revealing it, signing btc txs on its own.

>>50096938
no they are wrong, privacy by default leads to regulatory issues. being able to obscure when you are going private / wash is a lot more valuable.

xmr is already difficult to cash out, will only get more so even though yes in an ideal world it'd be superior

>>50096938
Just sell your monero and stop copin so hard niga, it's bad for your health

>>50091265
>you can anonymously transact bitcoin NATIVELY without any bridges.
You have to wrap your bitcoin on another network no? How is that native?

how much internet computer for a gram of k?

>>50097478
It’s not wrapped Bitcoin you fucking nigger. Bitcoin is integrated into the chain

>>50098232
nope its not. no such thing lmao

>>50098429
Keep coping faggot. Dfinity successfully integrated Bitcoin into their blockchain. No bridges and no wrapped bullshit

>>50098429
Denial is the first step of cope

>>50097478
No, the smart contracts on ICP can sign the transactions *directly* into the Bitcoin blockchain, however this will be as slow and costly as using BTC directly, the pro is that you can now lend and borrow BTC with minimal trust assumptions, which is a big deal. Additionally there will be a trustless bridge in case you need speed and low tx costs, called ckBTC (chain-key Bitcoin)

8 years is not enough staking

>>50091265
LOL BASED

>>50091294
>will never work
>already tested on btc testnet integration
go back to flipping burgers

>>50095051
you probably think that internet identity stores your passport photo huh. kek

>>50098718
my heart goes out to the retards who think this is supposed to lessen the cost of native btc txns kek. sometimes i feel like ICP bagholders really do deserve to lose it all

>>50099472
nigger I already flipped to shilling. not that a low IQ CHUD as yourself would understand the deeper meaning of this

>>50091294

>>50100059
it's just to much for the chud brain to comprehend

Zk tech bring privacy to every chain.

ICP token not needed.

Privacy has been commoditized

>>50099522
No one thinks that, what it can do though is basically function as a better lightning network. Or ofc just do the obvious thing of actually bringing trustless defi to btc.

>>50099522
No one is saying that. You’re just to retarded to understand what’s going on.

>>50100082

>>50100171
As a btc holder I'm looking forward to trustless defi and privacy using icp. Best part is, is I dont have to buy the icp shitcoin to use it.

Monero you have to buy XMR to use the network holy shit what a scam

>>50100226
That's the beauty of reverse gas, it does not matter if you buy it or not. The fees taken out will still be going towards strengthening the ICP network. Your feels are completely irrelevant, you will be pumping my bags and not even know it lol

>>50100244
Honestly im ok with this

WAGMI

>>50100226
But yes, part of the charm about ICP is that you do not need to buy it to use the network, that is what brings the normie and maxi adoption. It's still consuming cycles tho

>>50100269
Except for monero thats a scam

stop giving me hope, /biz/. I'm so comfortable with being a depressed loser, I can't cope with the belief that I might actually make it. someone, please give me some legitimate fud

Im about to buy 10k worth. I also need some fud please.

First mario, now minecraft? Icp bros keep winning. Stay mad virgins.

>>50100878
try spinner

>>50101369
only fud i can think of is that the media and normal people hate ICP, the centralization thing is a non-problem and being worked on.
The "fastest growing ecosystem" meme appears not to be a meme at this moment

>>50098232
Ok, so if it's not wrapped then whatever state transformations you do on your fancy chain, you have to mirror on the Bitcoin chain. And that's not private.
Except if you literally got the Bitcoin devs to modify the Bitcoin protocol itself, which would require a hardfork.
Basically this doesn't make any sense, it doesn't matter if you call it "wrapper" or "bridges" or you use whatever new terminology you just pulled out of your ass, you're doing some L2 stuff independently of the BTC chain itself.

>>50104027
They did modify the Btc protocol, it's called Taproot upgrade

>>50104027
they are replicating the btc chainstate on the IC
canisters on IC will be able to validate and create btc transactions with btc held on the canister
no bridge