/biz/ - Business & Finance

2-3 link is inevitable
but expecting it to hit 200-300 is just cope

it's going to $4 100%

>>50046831
>>50046867
No it wont and you retards are proof

>>50046784
this is why so many people told you to dca in near what looks like a bottom
but for some reason most posters here can only accept sniping the pico bottoms with an all in or nothing
are these bots or is /biz/ really that dumb i just cant tell anymore

I've been through the 16 cents bottom in 2018 and I'm 100% certain that the LINK bottom is already in. You simply have everything TA and fundamentals aligned. Especially the incredible high volume at LINKUSD at exact turning points for LINK/ETH and LINKBTC.
I remember how my friends switched their outlook basically overnight. From $1.40 down to like 30 cents they all were all the time saying "up soon". Then we hit below 20 cents and all of them changed their tone. Suddenly they all wait for sub 10 cents. I see the exact same shit playing out again and I'm irresponsibly long already. Everyone who called for $5-8 range is now calling for $2-3. You can easily spot retail niggas because they all change their fucking targets ON THE GO. They will all be burning themselves hard, again.
90% down due to price and then again another 75-90% cut due to missing the fucking train when the trend is suddenly up, hard. And once the bottom is in, alts (especially link) will go x2 to x3 very fucking fast. People will wanna kys thgemselves and can't fucking stomach "buying this high at $15 now" See it play out and take fucking notes

>>50047341
Link has no bottom if the market keeps crashing. Just like any other token. We all know it dumps the most and pumps the least

>>50047341
this

>>50046952
As easy as this sounds it takes a while to learn how to dca.

>>50047341
This but also for BTC, which affects LINK price obviously. When we were at 30-40k everyone was saying "20k is the bottom, 12k will never happen," and now that we are at 20k suddenly I'm seeing numbers like 10k and even lower from bobos. "This time is different," they say, muh recession.We may get one more dump but LINK will begin recovering on the ratios anyway, $2-3 is a pipe dream.

>>50047689
Links price is shit because of celcius and nexo shorting

>>50046784
I hate when ppl tweet shit like this makes it sound like a ponzi.

>>50047701
What's your point?

>>50047341
Great morale boosting post which is also quite reasonable. However it's also true that last tine the US economy wasn't about to shit itself.

>>50047915
BTC was created as a safe haven asset against recession and inflation, one of these days it will break out.

I am literally doing this right now

>>50047822

>>50047822
>biggest enemies of link are getting destroyed and staking is coming
>what's your point?

>>50048188
>two entities closing their short positions will make up for the total lack of buyers we've had since $50
Why didn't you sell the top you absolute retard?

>>50048101
https://youtu.be/Es1wpGohYB8?t=1442

had to check what jolly guy has to say... The bot is not in. ITS NOT IN I REPEAT, BOT NOT IN

>>50047341
the exact same happened after the summer of defi
so many retards i'll buy link again at 2usd then it rebounded hard at 6.5
right now if i look at the link chart i am constantly reminded of that screengrab about the eth guy that tried to swing at the 10's and then lost his mind when it pumped
so i have been dca'ing in since the second dip to 5.5 don't care if there is another crash and i lose fiat valuation, actually would prefer another crash as my dca would lower my buy in, but on the whole more worried about being left behind at this stage

>>50046784
And if they don't you will finally learn of FOMO and buy at $15 because you were greedy.

>>50048188
You’re talking to a nexo bot

>>50048239
upwards of 50 million tokens have been shorted and you're too fucking stupid to realize how well link has done all things considered due to constant buying pressure. these threats are being eliminated and most of it will have to be bought back upon liquidation. tie into the fact that staking is coming and hurr durr what is your point. and fyi i did take profits in the 50s and have been dcaing back in.

>>50047341
LINK started to decorelate again from BTC and ETH like in the bear market bull run.
The only thing which still keeps it down is Celsius and Nexo shorting it with their user's funds.

This is 1 million LINK Celsius dumped on the Robinhood listing and which they will never buy back and their users lost forever.
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x78443b3e3a03c27ddd2b3ab0790755fc66ceb2a2d3692cd233b722b92ea740d5

>>50048355
How fucking new are you? If someone is closing a huge short position in a bear market, you short the top of the bounce. There's no new money coming in the markets, better luck in 2 years.

>>50048188
I don't disagree but you replied to me like it was some form of rebuttal when it doesn't really add to or change what I said.

>>50048412
>hurr durr an incredible amount of buying that flips the trend i should short it. no new money except for nodes requiring it lol short it

>>50048479
Dont even try, people have been brainwashed into down only and are too stupid to see the light.

>>50047689
>$2-3 is a pipe dream
I've heard that about $10, $8, $5 etc
just shut the fuck up and admit you don't know shit
>>50048508
>brainwashed into down only
the fuck you're talking about, LINK threads for the past 2 years have been filled with
>muh bottom is in
>muh reversal
>muh imminent pump to top 3

>>50048479
>node operators
I am sure the node operators will be buying shitloads of LINK tokens to get the rewards from price queries for the 50 defi projects that are not dead yet.

BTC and ETH nearly took a 50% haircut and LINK nearly doubled on both those pairings. It was the only alt that didn't go down with them in the recent carnage.

I don't see how people lose their mind over a few dollars on their basis entry when they are targeting $300 price point in the future. Its the kind of thing that keeps people from entering at all

>>50048571
I'm talking about general sentiment not link only. Btc will end up as a safe haven asset sooner than later.

>>50048624
they won't, the contracts requiring the feeds will though. chainlinks market metrics show it is profitable btw. wait till network effect happens and smartcontracts are used in real world examples.

>>50048649
considering the current macro conditions I see absolutely no reason for that to happen, why do you think BTC will become a safe haven? le inflation hedge meme is dead and buried
>>50048752
>wait till smartcontracts are used in real world examples
10 more years guys!
I'm all in for speculation about future developments, but they must be based in reality ffs

>>50048831
BTC was created as a safe haven asset against recession and inflation and it will take that role when legacy markets self destruct.

>>50048876
>BTC was created as a safe haven
the only thing it has managed to do is follow the stock market at lockstep and since the beginning, you're literally advocating for something that never happened, exactly like all these retards screaming for a new (bearish) paradigm
the idea that BTC will suddenly decouple from the entire global economy just because, is even more retarded and delusional than permabulls or permabears

>>50047341
>bottom is already in
>TA and fundamentals
>high volume
LMAO @ "high volume"
screencapped for my cringe collection and thanks for the sell signal

>>50046952
This

>>50049082
BTC didn't always follow the stock market newfag, that is an occurrence of the last 3 years.

>>50049082
>follow the stock market at lockstep and since the beginning
no, the nasdaq correlation started in sept then moved into clown world from nov up to the luna collapse
the correlation algos pretty much self destructed in the recent crash and the vc cancer that was causing this is also burned pretty badly so that specific piece of clown world is probably gone

but never go full retard and say a half a year correlation was there all the time

>>50049287
>>50049297
you are so painfully ignorant and new it hurts
it has been following the Nasdaq at a ratio of 1:1, additionally, it has been inversely correlated to the DXY since the beginning, just like every other asset class
stop embarrassing yourselves

>>50049333
checked but your chart literally proves my point you illiterate nigger

>>50049393
>huuurrr I'll just pretend I can't read macro charts
pic rel is 2011 correlation, the weakest it has been yet

>>50049393
here's the 2014 chart, keep denying reality
also I love how you've swallowed your tongue about the inverse correlation to the DXY
did that also occurred for the first time 3 years ago? kek

>>50049393
Yeah once it was listed on the stock market as a tradeable asset it was ogre. That was a few years ago iirc. Probably lines up with what you are saying.

omegalul
fuckwits kek
i mean despite the market there's going to be some retards and some actual progressives like Artlink with their profitable monetization ways for NFT artists

>>50049524
>its the same pattern

>>50049623
do you see how BTC pumps right after the nasdaq reaches an ATH? do you see how BTC bear markets coincidentally line up almost perfectly with stock market downturns?
can you read the fucking chart?

>>50049664
You need to buy some new glasses or a new brain anon

>>50049082
>the idea that BTC will suddenly decouple from the entire global economy just because
>"no one will realize this is a ponzi scheme and dump it"

>>50049711
keep catching these knives anon, see how that turns out for oyu

>>50049664
Meds
I see a straightly line of nadaq up and wild bitcoin movements
The whole bear market nasdaq made new ath

>>50049747
Stay on the Point

>>50046923

lol that is what you linkies said about 5$ and we going there right now

>>50049753
>oh fuck quick I got to change the narrative
>"meds schizo"
>>50049763
I can't do anything if you choose to decode the chart as you please, what the fuck do you want from me, to highlight every single fucking candle for your blind ass?

>>50049795
>>50049753
>I see a straightly line of nadaq up and wild bitcoin movements
>The whole bear market nasdaq made new ath
ARGUE

>>50049795
It just has no correlation dumbass

>>50047674
how do you do it?

>>50049524
This literally proves in 2014-2015 bitcoin moved with no correlation (or even an inverse correlation) to the stock market.

>>50046784
He isn't telling you about how ICP makes oracles unnecessary complexity and worthless

>>50046784
Too much moon fags is reason why it won’t play out like this. The market manupilators will make things as painful as possible.

>Scenario 1: they just have everything crab around current levels for years, maintaining levels too expensive for the moon bois to want to buy back in while they accumulate. This goes on for 3-5 years with a steady supply of fud and demoralizes them and shakes all normies out before an up trend happens.

>Scenario 2: mega black swan, it goes down to the levels the moon bois want to buy back in at but keeps going down and they catch a brutal knife. It stays at rock bottom for years completely demoralizing everyone and shaking out the normies before a very, very slow climb back to reach new ATH’s mid 2030s before immediately crashing again and crabbing for another decade before reaching 100k in the 2040s.

The sad reality is Jews are in market now and they hate us, everything is about keeping us poor and making themselves rich and they can operate on much longer time scales then we can. They don’t care how long it takes, only that we become demoralized and are shaken out.

>>50049333
if you think that is a ratio of 1:1 you might want to go shopping for a new brain there

>>50049802
>>50049816
I literally can't argue with stupid
>nasdaq is a straight line up
see these blow off tops of BTC? if you watch the nasdaq closely, you will notice that each and every time BTC has exploded, the nasdaq had made an ATH mere weeks before, fun fact, Nasdaq and BTC have peaked simultaneously almost every time
now do you see these tiny teeny red candles on the nasdaq? these represent replacements up to 20%, which is huge for the stock market as you already know. now notice that almost every time BTC has experienced some major retracement it coincides with a relatively huge red dildos on the stock market
that holds true for EVERY BTC CYCLE, no exceptions
>>50049881
Nasdaq made a new peak every time BTC made a new ATH, both in April and in November 2013
>>50049948
my bad, that ratio actually applies to the inverse correlation to the DXY
now try arguing with this, retards

It's going to $5 in the near future

>>50046784
This is my accumulation range.

>>50049900
Lmfao they will lose control of it soon.

>>50047341
Reminds me of that one nigga crying about selling ETH at single digits and couldn't bring himself to buy back in at double digits only to see it rocket to 3

>>50049973
Ok my last reply you must be a jew only they shamelessly lie about thing everyone can see
DXY went up in 2021 to novewmber while btc went up aswell just as example
>>50049973
The whole bitcoin bear market nasdaq made new ATHs you braindead retard stop ignoring this

>>50049208
>you are a buy signal
>you are a sell signal
I hate all of you faggot wolf of wallstreet wannabes go back to fucking wallstreetbets you stupid niggers.

>>50050062
>DXY went up in 2021 to novewmber
>it went up
why lie so blatantly though?
>The whole bitcoin bear market nasdaq made new ATHs
nasdaq CRABBED you retard, while experiencing retracements upto 20%, read the fucking chart you gaslighting jew

>>50047341
>They will all be burning themselves hard, again.
god i hope so

>>50047341
I remember I was there at the link bottom and was feeling like shit buying at $0.50 when I could of gotten 2.5x my stack just a little earlier but swallowed my pride and just bought, normies are incapable of this, they always feel like they are being ripped off and too skiddish to buy back in until everyone is fomo’ing

>>50050174
>>it went up
>why lie so blatantly though?
IT LITERALLY WENT UP ALL 2021

>>50049973
>my bad, that ratio actually applies to the inverse correlation to the DXY
thats a much better argument, do make sure you double check your statements before arrogantly calling others retards
i still wouldn't really call it 1:-1 as btc moons and dxy is in a narrow range, but the correlation there is undeniable

>>50050174
>>The whole bitcoin bear market nasdaq made new ATHs
>nasdaq CRABBED you retard, while experiencing retracements upto 20%, read the fucking chart you gaslighting jew
It only crabbed after bitcoin bottomed out

>>50050224
IT LITERALLY DOUBLE BOTTOMED AT HISTORIC LOWS EACH TIME BTC MADE A NEW ATH BOTH TIMES IN 2021 YOU ABSOLUTE ILLITERATE BLIND MORON

>>50046784
that pfp looks so retarded

>>50050235
thanks but you get my fucking point so stop being nuanced like the other retard

>>50050241
DXY DID NOT BOTTOM IN NOVEMBER 2021 LOOK AT YOUR CHART

>>50050258
THE DXY BOTTOMED BOTH IN MAY AND IN JAN AND IN MAY, IT RETRACED IN NOVEMBER YOU ABSOLUTE FUCKING NUANCED NIGGERFAGGOT MORON DERAILER
FUCK OFF AND DON'T @ ME AGAIN

>>50050213
same shit is happening now, and you have this board infested with normie niggers pretending that any sort of sentiment here is a buy or sell signal when /biz/ literally has an opinion for every direction every fucking day just to be contrarian. then when the trend finally reverses some retard will post a screenshot of some post he capped and say "OMG ANON INSIDER CALLED IT" ignoring that someone else called it 100 straight days before and 100 straight days after and this just happened to be the one that got it right. the fact people are still too peabrained to understand this, the only useful metric for sentiment is overall interest, and its fucking tanked now for over a year, so that should give you an idea where we are.

>>50050266
Thats not called correlation if both went up for 6 months retard
If anything it could be a leading indicator

>>50047341
you fail to account for the literal organized DeFi shorts by powerful organizations

>nD+NFVOP
you're that retarded faggot posting your screencaps and arguing in circles all day making 50+ pbtid in every thread aren't you?

>>50048752
chainlink metrics don't show profits, they show rewards and you don't know anything about gas prices and other operating costs so you're just uninformed or dishonest, either way a nigger

>>50046952
people are that dumb
say the bottom is $4.60 and someone bought in at $5, they will be seething that they missed the bottom by 9%
if it goes to $100 they will completely forget that though but they would have equally forgotten it if they bought in at $20 because their orders at $4.50 were never filled

Anyway DXY has correlation but its stupid because DXY is almost 70% dollar to euro and the euro is basically dying

>>50050308
Thats not called correlation if both went up for 6 months retard

>>50046784
My target is 1.xx at $400 ETH, plenty of pain left in the real market and too many idiots on here are screaming about Bulgarian/Israeli conspiracies against LINK again and calling for a short squeeze, which is always a signal that it's about to dump hard

>DXY is stupid
>the leading index which directly influenced the market prices of every other asset in existence is stupid
>because of the euro being slightly more valuable
>the DXY is stupid
I'm literally speechless at the utter stupidity of this poster

>>50050384
Yes it influences it and you can trade it
I just say its clownworld like stupid that it is this way because as i said euro is 70% while yuan rubel and many more are 0%
How is this not stupid
>oh the dollar is gaining worth
No the eutro just lost more

>>50050384
>slightly more
kek
>valuable
weighted not valuable
Im just doubting if you even know the definition of correlation.
>>50050454
>70%
60% "only"

>>50046784
95% drop from ath of 52.7 is 2.6. Entirely reasonable. Most alts drop that much in a bear market.

>>50050375
you realize that shit is literally never going away right? not with how invested this board is. its either going to drag them all up kicking and screaming with it, or the project will completely fail because market sentiment said too many retards own it that's it. sentiment is only one indicator and every retard on here uses it as their #1 indicator because all they know how to do is pretend they're contrarian all the time to feign higher intelligence.

>>50049333
>1:1
>as it dives down as stocks go up
ah, yeah, right, fuck off then

>>50046784
COPE linkies

>>50050557
Sentiment on /biz/ ebbs and flows, whenever /biz/ starts posting about conspiracies against LINK it tends to mean LINK is about to dump again.

>>50047341
Link price depends on btc price. Macro economic environment looks like shit. Calling the bottom at this point is pants on head

>>50050694
except that time in May of 2020 when it pumped from 5 dollars to 20. nothing posted here matters or is a useful indicator to time the market and if it were you'd all be rich by now.

> My target is 1.xx at $400 ETH, plenty of pain left in the real market and too many idiots on here are screaming about Bulgarian/Israeli conspiracies against LINK again and calling for a short squeeze, which is always a signal that it's about to dump hard

to further add, the reason these threads get so much attention and arguing is because most of you/us are intj/p's, you want to perceive the world in a rational way. markets are irrational, chaotic, they cannot be easily explained, so you have everyone here applying their own spin on it to explain what's happening. except none of them truly know either, which is why they're still shitposting here and not sipping drinks on their yacht. inb4 "oh I actually made it already and I just post here for fun"

>>50050788
See you at $1-2 and $400-500 ETH. You should've expected a 95% correction from the top at a minimum.

>>50050818
> See you at $1-2 and $400-500 ETH. You should've expected a 95% correction from the top at a minimum.

>>50050798
you are here forever anon, best to accept it now
you see making it by having line go up on internet magic money doesn't get you a network in real life
old money hates the nouveau rich always but crypto neets are especially hated
the other class of people that can make it from rags to riches are generally entrepeneurs or assorted businessowners who through their rise have acquired a very broad network of people of their own kind to hang out with
but we have nothing like that no matter how rich you get /biz/ for all its retardation is still the best peer group you will ever know

as to the sipping drinks on yacht delusion, how would you go about the acquire the ability to even sail the damn thing anon, nevermind the mindnumbing bureaucracy the get all your loicences in order

>>50047341
>all of them changed their tone. Suddenly they all wait for sub 10 cents
tale as old as time, happens with literally everything in the market

anyone who knows anything about TA knows that $5 is the bottom
waiting for anything sub $5 is stupid
even if BTC dumps to $10k, link will pump in sats to compensate.

>>50050557
true
if sentiment is your top indicator, that means you spend too much time on message boards, kek

>>50046784
Le *Calvin Swindleson who shilled LINK the hardest during the $20 and $50 peaks.*

>>50047701
And they aren't stopping, ever.

>>50046923
if btc dumps 50%+, you don't think link will dumpn at least by the same amount?

>>50052611
well celsius is definitely stopping, that's for sure
kind of hard to short when you're bankrupt

At one point 6-7 dollars was the shitpost and you've had to move the goal post even further. The fact that this is still unthinkable is further bolstering my belief that we have lower to go and are nowhere fucking close to capitulation kek

>>50047701
Cope

>>50047400

I don't read your posts if you're in a link thread with 15+ replies unless you're nfcdl

Fuck I hate you cunts. Why am I still here.

>>50052352
you don't understand, I have no aspirations to jump social classes, I just want to pay bills without having to sell drugs anymore, not sure where you got that out of my post

>>50052663
excluding current crash, only 13 out of the 4362 trading days on btc have seen worse conditions then we are currently in
>we are nowhere fucking close to capitulation
we can debate about the price of the bottom bottom, but saying that we arent even close to capitulation is beyond retarded

>>50052663
if it hits 2 dollars, someone will say there is no way link can go sub 1 dollar again, and you or someone like you will say "hurrr this is bolstering my belief we have lower to go and nowhere fucking close to capitulation kek". and eventually, someone will be wrong, but nobody will remember, it'll just be leaves in the wind, except for the told you so posters with all their capped posts who act like they knew all along when they didn't know shit either.

I'll tell you this though, if you're looking for sentiment on link, on this board, to get to the point that everyone forgets about it, and everyone thinks its over, and it will go lower, and there's no hope, you're on the wrong fucking board cause that'll never happen. And if that's how you plan to time the bottom, you will guaranteed miss it.

>>50046784
there is zero chance that link stays under $2,000 for "a few years"

>>50049841
>spend x amount of dollars each week on the asset you want to buy

>>50053088
>that'll never happen
you NEVER fucking learn, do you

>>50052982
i replied to the second part of your post where you questioned whether or not make it anons would still post here and you used the yacht reference

it has nothing to do with social classes and a desire to jump them
you see by making it from crypto you place yourself entirely out of every social circle in society that exists and cryptos inherent anon internet origin means there exists no crypto circle itself to integrate into irl, thats is also to say nothing about the security risk to yourself by publicly claiming crypto success

but let me spell it out for you even having the ability to pay your bills without worry already sets you apart from most normies and probably from most of your current social circle
you don't believe this now, but watch it will happen to you to: your current normie friends can smell the lack of desperation and calmness and content on you and they will despise you for it
you also alienate yourself from them as you cannot relate to their tales of daily struggle anymore, never forget they are all crabs in a bucket
so then where do you go for social interactions where you don't have to hid your powerlevel, well here of course so don't worry anon no matter how much you make it you will still be shitposting here best get comfy to the idea now

>>50050818
>95% correction from the top AT A MINIMUM

jewish hands typed that comment

>>50046784
>dreams about ETH at 500 usd
>buys LINK instead
What a fucking community this crypto nonsense is

>>50052639
link/btc has plenty of room to pump

>>50049333
the only correlation at ALL is that they both went up over time.

>>50053040
We aren't and it isn't. We are coming off of 10+ years of heavy QE as the fed desperately tries to curb inflation. Do I think there's more upside than downside in the long term? You bet. But there are one too many cryptobros here that are in a bubble and ignoring this reality. I don't think capitulation is anywhere close in the broad market and that's bad news for everyone of us here. The blood is just about to really start because it takes some months for hedge funds to sell off their positions at the request of their clients. Which doesn't seem to be happening quite yet. So yeah, next few months aren't going to be an exciting time for many of us if the fed is gonna keep hiking rates. The worse it gets is the more people are gonna start asking if they really want to hold digital money.

>>50053088
Nah I know delusion is back on the menu. It went away for a while because link did so piss poor that nobody could even smug post. Now that we've seemingly bottomed I've noticed a pretty decent uptick of link shitposting but that's just me.

I don't even mean only link. I mean the broader crypto market is definitely going to go lower at this rate and I don't think the bottom is going to be in until September or October. Strap in.

>>50053143
you really think you're going to time the market with sentiment, don't you. kek the irony telling others they'll never learn, thinking they're immune to their own emotions.

>>50053226
the confidence and hubris this board has, proclaiming a 95% retracement is unthinkable truly baffles me, not even kidding
tell me, what the fuck has even changed in a fundamental way in ETH from 2019? absolutely NOTHING, still unscalable and unreasonably expensive, still way behind their 2018 roadmap, zero innovation, zero progress
what even prevents it from dropping right back down to 3 digit valuation? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
if the last 2 years have taught you anything, is to be prepared for literally EVERY POSSIBLE OUTCOME, if you think that things can't possibly get any worse than this, THEY WILL.
ignore this at your own peril
>inb4 you're telling me to sell my crypto fuck off fudnigger
no, I'm telling you don't put all your eggs in one basket

>>50053351
you'll never admit a bottom because you'll always feel the need to be the contrarian in the room, and this board is perma mumu on crypto whether you admit it or not, even the bobo posting is 90% of the time larping fags trying to manipulate newfags. the truth is you're probably one of them yourself. been on this website too long to know your type, its the same on every board, act like you hate the thing you love because you're paranoid that normies will flock to it and ruin it for you.

>>50053383
no, I'm not trying to time any market, I'm trying to prepare for what is coming, because it is coming no matter what you or I believe/say/do

>>50053442
oh god the same /pol/ tier shit I've been reading for years now, buy your ammo, buy your metals, the worlds going to end. you're not and never will be prepared for shit to actually hit the fan, not by shitposting on here.

>>50053351
>as the fed desperately tries to curb inflation
wrong anon, they dont desperately fight inflation, that would be doing a volcker
what is happening now is pure theater to appease the political class into thinking they are doing something against inflation but they arent
powell is just waiting for the go ahead to print again, we have been over this before countless times: QT, rate hikes and a .gov budget deficit with the current high debt levels are a mathematical impossibility, one of those has to give soon
but please do keep self fudding you'll eat crow soon enough

everyone ITT should unironically go outside and touch grass

>>50053421
95% retrace is entirely possible, but writing that you SHOULD EXPECT that a token retraces 95% MINIMUM shows that you are trying to manipulate people you disgusting jew

>>50053468
I'm not preparing through /biz/ you self proclaimed contrarian faggot, I'm discussing business and finance on the /biz/ board
calm your fucking tits

>>50053442
also you're not fooling anyone, you guys obsessively posting in link threads betrays why you're really here, whatever you claim to be about. you're just stuck waiting like the rest of us, you just want to pretend you're above it all or you have some sort of plan.

>>50053482
agreed on that, thanks for clarifying

>>50053490
I'm a LINK holder you literal imbecile, fuck off

>>50053485
fuck you you contrarian faggot, go post in the other business and finance threads where it actually matters since this is just a shitcoin full of delusional bagholders, why bother here? it would be like walking into an insane asylum and claiming you want to discuss business and finance.

>>50047341
I started DCAing again a few weeks ago because of this
as nice as $5 or sub $5 link would be I'm not gonna try to time it, I just buy once a week now and whatever happens happens, if the global economy shits the bed and crypto tanks 99% more then we have bigger problems anyway

>blew all their cash on HR roasties
>years behind schedule
>enterprises pulling out due to economic circumstances
Link is FUCKED and is unironically going to ZERO!
Get out NOW!

>>50053440
Nigger I'm down as much as the rest of you. I expect an S&P bottom of 3000 or the bottom is in when the fed commits ton stopping rate hikes. Open a fucking book do you think things can't go down because -90 is such a big number? If it goes up then it means I'm wrong but I'm hedged for that already since I have a long enough timeframe to wait it out. Take your meds. Enough of this shit.

>>50053473
Nah this is them desperately trying to fight it because they can't pull a volcker without the government needing to default. Definitely a "who blinks first" scenario still I think but man the fact that there are so many people convinced this is nearly the bottom because it's gone down so much are just way too drunk on copium.

>>50053485
>>50053497
>>50053505
23 posts by this id
he starts off rational enough with posting charts on discussing the presence of a correlation
but now he devolves into pol tier shitposting its the end of the world the fed will make it mad max blood on the streets
>i'm a link holder myself

half this thread is telling you to dca in at reasonable price levels over a long investing horizon, with current prize levels it is definitely an accumulation zone for long term holders
and you degenerate into end of the world doomposting, but then go around and claim you still hold link
that doesn't make any sense at all

you are paid by nexo arent you, hows the weather in bulgaria, been robbed by wild gypsies lately?

>>50053505
>>50053497
>>50053485
>>50053442
>>50053421
>>50053143
>dxy and btc are exactly reverse correlated
>yes both going up for 6 months last year simultanously is proof for that

>>50046784
keep on dreaming dumbass. Invest in something useful like MATIC, Your only home of seeing 100x

>>50053622
agreed that's what I'm getting at, same with this poster
>>50053601
but rational discussion is off the table apparently, its like these fuckwads think if they aren't the most bearish person in the room, they haven't paid the karmic debt necessary for the market to turn around yet. that's not how it fucking works. I was super bullish in 2019, guess what, link went up for a year and a half straight, how did that work out, why didn't my or this boards bullishness indicate we have a lot longer to go until the bottom? because none of it fucking matters, or it does in a minor way that niggers completely blow out of proportion because they need their messageboard dopamine hits.

>>50047701
Yeah but how could you blame them? Link is the perfect token to short. Available across every major dex, cex, lending, and leverage platform. No retail support. And the whales shorting want more link anyway so it's win-win. Make money on the way down to buy more at the bottom.

>>50053622
what exactly is pol tier shitposting to you? the possibility of a global depression? you are delusional
>you are paid by nexo
I could not give a FUCK about bulgarian gypsies going under, LET THEM BURN
and nexo won't be the last to fall either

>>50053678
>but rational discussion is off the table apparently
it would appear so
we will see in 3.5 years at next expected btc cycle peak who is in the right
us who are saying accumulation starts here
or you who will snipe the absolute bottom
you'll never post again, but i am surprised what your average buy in is going to look like, i for one am quite happy if my current 6ish is what its gonna be

>>50053905
before this gets misinterpreted i should have posted them who will snipe the bottom and not you
so people don't think i am accusing the anon i was replying to

>>50053938
nah you're good I think anyone reading can follow along, also fuck that cunt for not checking my dubs earlier.
and to respond to you on the yacht post to clarify, I know we're all here forever, wasn't necessarily implying that, rather that posters here who insist their method for predicting the market is usually barely a step above tea leaves and if it was that successful they'd be using it rather than sharing it because otherwise people will trade against you.
anyways I'm tired of anons acting scared to have hopium or be bullish, just cause they got some skin in the game and saw their first 90% drawdown. be delusional, be crazy, be a fucking MANIAC.

>>50054045
>rather that posters here who insist their method
ah yes of course the overlap of made it anons and ta posting market timers is pretty limited if not to say non existing, fully agree with you there
but don't let that dissuade you from thinking there arent some turbo chads here shitposting for da lulz

>>50054209
nah I know, there are link og's with mid 6 figure stacks, there was at least one with over a mil not sure how much he's dumped, I think he was aiming at being a node operator.
but it does make me question if these people were even here in early 2019, because same fucking deal, market was super bearish and this board was completely irrationally bullish on link, if that was an indicator we have a far way down to go we'd have hit 10 cents, 5 cents, but instead we started up and never stopped. because sentiment doesn't matter, and this board will never stop being bullish on link until there is widespread smartcontract adoption in the real world.

>>50049524
>>50049333
Dude this is not at all a 1:1 correlation

>>50046784
>>50046952
>>50047341
>>50048264
>>50053088
2013-2015
BTC: $1,127 --> $200 (-82%)

2017-2018
BTC: $19,423 --> $3,217 (-83%)
ETH: $1,448 --> $85 (-94%)

Current cycle:
BTC: $67,167 --> $27,682 (-59%)
ETH: $4,815 --> $1,466 (-69%)

-83% BTC from ATH is $11k, if you think that can't push Link to $2-$4 range, under the macro conditions of "permanent inflation" and recession, then idk what to say other than to ask what exactly makes you think this time is different other than your emotions?
>t. 10k link baggie down bad

>>50054943
Its very quite simple. If LINK goes that low. I get to buy more. Verification not required.

>>50055000
Ill take the checked please.

>>50054943
is this considered pol-tier shitposting?

>>50054943
I've posted this before and it usually doesn't get a response, but link sats hit bottom in June 2018. BTC capitulated another 50% from there, but link price stayed the same, sats actually went up around 2.5x. Link is correlated to the market, but it doesn't follow it exactly, that's why it had its bull from Q2 2019 to Q3 2020, while everything else didn't even takeoff until Q1 2021 or Q4 2020 earliest. Suggesting that this breaks and link will now just follow the market like a dead shitcoin is actually the emotional play at this point. Especially since its already shown the same signs as last bear market that it won't be pushed down with btc/eth during the final capitulation.

>>50055074
I'm simply stating BTC can very likely fall much further, institutional bag holders notwithstanding. The overall economic macro conditions are really ugly and crypto has never seen a true recession.

Do I think Link could do its bear market thing and lead the market? Absolutely, I'm just prepared for anything at this point, and the outlook for VC fundraising certainly plays into this perspective.

>>50054943
>Link to $2-$4 range
Obnoxiously salivating to think about.

>>50055109
I'm not disagreeing with the prepare for anything stance, rather just the "obviously link should fall much lower" stance. Maybe it will, maybe it won't, if you're invested in it because of the idea that smart contract adoption is going to change the world, are you ballsy enough to think you can time the ebbs and flows of this market? Because if you're not, then nothing you're saying really matters, cause that's all it is, trying to time the bottom. The time to be smart and take profits was 1-2 years ago, that time is over now. You're either buying or holding, but the people capitulating now are the ones who made zero plans and were playing with leverage or gambling with money they couldn't afford to lose (which I'm sure is some of you as evidenced by the amount of assholes freaking out over losing their money on bancor/celsius/nexo).

>>50055173
Well said anon.

>>50055173
>"obviously link should fall much lower"
Did not say should, rather that it could
>ballsy enough to think you can time the ebbs and flows of this market?
Said nothing about swinging either.

Just step back and realize that people have been saying Link couldn't go any lower, for months now. If I were buying, I'd be buying now and DCA'ing down to catch the bottom, because it ultimately doesn't make a huge difference if I'm buying at $2-$6 in the long run, especially when I have been holding since before the Binance listing.

>>50055109
also
>crypto has never seen a true recession.
this is becoming a meme at this point, no different than tether fud, china bans etc. news does not move the market, market moves are just explained by news after the fact. there is always a narrative that can and will be used to explain what happened regardless if that was the case, if the market was bullish right now with btc nearing or over 100k people would be pushing crypto as a hedge against inflation, its not so "crypto has never seen a true recession" is the narrative instead.
again, I think those of us here who shitpost in these longass link threads every day, at least some of us, still have remorse over being unable to time the market. some of these posters go on long winded hindsight tangents lecturing their past selves as much as current posters because they think next time they'll see it coming. I'm just saying, no, you probably won't, and its kind of pointless to assume you will. And regardless, I don't think the majority here bought link to try to time the market because if they did there were many smarter plays over the last 4-5 years, they bought link because they're unironically in it for the tech, not that they don't want to get rich off it, but that they can see what's coming and its inevitable. The rest of this, dogcoins, mev, luna, its all just noise and distractions that induce fomo.

>>50055248
>If I were buying, I'd be buying now and DCA'ing down to catch the bottom, because it ultimately doesn't make a huge difference if I'm buying at $2-$6 in the long run, especially when I have been holding since before the Binance listing.
this is something I think all anons can agree with, parsing about whether this is the bottom or not and refusing to buy is like refusing to buy 60 cents link 4 years ago, I'm sure some anons regret that decision.

>>50046784

Based. I've been a Svensonite since 2018. He gets some things wrong before the most part he's been spot on.

>>50055319
>becoming a meme at this point
It is objectively, categorically, realistically, not a meme. The macro economic environment has never been this bad since BTC launched as the last recession ended. These actually are new conditions, and a cool off for inflation of food and gas is nowhere in sight.

We're betting on "the hiding strategy" and "enterprise adoption" coming to fruition during nearly catastrophic economic conditions.

>>50055407
You sound like you know what you're talking about with link, so why are you talking about it as if its a completely speculative asset reliant on retail fomo like the majority of the rest of this asset class? This isn't about whether the bottom is a little bit lower btw, but rather about whether a recession really matters for what link is attempting to do in the medium-long term (talking next 2-3 years). Those are the sorts of things that occur regardless of market conditions. People like to compare link to amazon, well amazon began its meteoric ascent in 2008, which coincidentally was the start of the last recession.

>>50055449
>why are you talking about it as if its a completely speculative asset
it's called being conservative, and on that note the corrupt CeFi and VC circus has not been fully burned down/liquidated yet and that is going to be the last act of crypto for now — once this unholy filth is purged we will see the true current state of this market with the masks off entirely.

>>50055506
I agree, and we're in the process of watching it burn now. What actually worries me is that it isn't burned enough and we still get one last cycle of clown market. But that's outside of our control.

>>50055449
Dude I hate to be that guy but it doesn't matter how revolutionary something is if the economy shits itself and people need to sell things to eat. Fundamentals go out the window in times of crisis. That's why gold and silver aren't doing great and will probably go lower rather than higher in the short term.

>>50055407
>We're betting on "the hiding strategy" and "enterprise adoption" coming to fruition during nearly catastrophic economic conditions.
spot on

>>50055526
That's why you position yourself during those times, blood in the streets and all that. I was 23 in 2008 and had jack and shit to invest at the time, with no position in any market, but if I had, I'd probably be retired by now.

>>50055524
Did you know Goldman is seeking two-billion dollars to buy out Celsius? This fallout isn't going to go quite how some people might imagine or want, these companies do have some value and there is interest from bigger fish to swoop in and bail them out.
>>50055526
You can bet one thing for certain, I'm not going to do what would be the equivalent of selling Amazon at the bottom out of an emotional reaction to macro factors, it's called work anon go earn some fucking money.
>>50055553
A lot of people bought Link at double digits, and CeFi gangsters shorted us out of what should have been a longer bull run. It is what it is, the snakes have to be routed out and they will be. Under any other circumstances, link euphoria would be absolutely unhinged considering that we have a timeline for staking and we can see for ourselves the groundwork being laid for the initial phases being rolled out unironically soon.

>>50055646

>>50054943
>>50055109
Well said, anon. The rationalisations are already piling on I see.

>>50055319
The fact you talk like this is a matter of news events shows you have no idea of economic reality, not just for what is to come but how distinct it is from the time you've been in crypto. I can't even be bothered to educate you on how retarded it is to consider a recessionary environment something crypto or LINK can just brush off because it's such an absurdly retarded starting point and clearly another baggie coping mechanism.

>>50055705
kek it's fucking over

>>50055993
lol fuck off retard
>>50056003
how can you be this retarded?

>>50056043
Look at you tie yourself in knots after making a perfectly levelheaded point and having an emotional reaction to it because it's so uncomfy. Nice cognitive dissonance.

>>50056077
you don't have a point, you're cherry picking

>>50054943
the other anon already eloquently explained it
but the posters you quoted never said the market couldn't go lower, if you go up you can see i clearly said i would be happy at another crash as it would lower my average buy in
what half the thread has been calling is: this price is a good point for you to start your dca'ing, if you dca around a perceived bottom you usually get a good entry
we are arguing against the others in this thread we are noooo you cant buy in here its guaranteed to go lower muh recession muh blood in the streets
the danger is there is absolutely no guarantee it will go lower (see link price during 2018) and then you will be fucked with a much high buy in
ultimately it boils down to the specific type of all or nothing black and white autist that this place attracts, this whole thread shows that a sizeable portion of /biz/ simply does not understand dca'ing and risk management

>>50056227
he meant YOUR point
bipolar? wtf?

>>50054943
also why are you using those old numbers for this cycle btc dipped to 17ish and eth to 0.8ish

>>50056227
You made a reasoned take demonstrating objective fact, which is absolutely valid context without even taking into account macro factors. You then start rationalising away and pretending it isn't and calling people who say it's a good point retarded kek. All because LINK couldn't POSSIBLY hit $3. Picrel is you. That is cognitive dissonance, anon. You are emotionally coping with an inconvenient perspective you yourself mentioned.

>>50055646
>bail them out.
Thats not whats happening retard
They want cheap assets to dump, celsius is utterly in itself is utterly worthless

>>50046784
Anyone want the rest of this retarded report? Some of you will remember this fatty analyst from a year or two ago who uses Metcalfe's law to do price analysis.

>>50055526
>>50055993
you see this is the part where you are playing with fire, an asset like link isn't dominate by retail in the fartest possible stance we arent talking about fucking dogecoin here
people that ever need to worry about selling things to eat aint going to move this market
deep pocketed investors looking to buy up irrationally depressed assets with a future growth story are shopping around for the current discount deals
in the very specific case of link it should come out on top especially in a recession, because once link goes fully live its a costs saving solution to make current processes more efficient, during economic booms corps don't care so much about cleaning up their bottom line a percentage point, but in a recession thats precisely whats getting done
now before you begin yes this is a bit too early for all of this to play out, but how many times must we make the comparison to amazon for it to truly stick
i sold in feb on recession and inflation fears when bullard spoke and tanked the markets and i started buying back in here
selling now for recession fears is retardedly late and not starting your accumulation phase is gambling on a better buy in, good luck too you if you succeed but i am not that greedy for missing out on this would be more suicide inducing than not calling the absolute bottom

>>50056588
>fartest
Kek
Cbf replying to the "LINK will actually go UP during a macroeconomic meltdown because companies can cut costs with it!" bs cope. Reminds me of the cope from exchange token hokders pretending their token is immune to crashes because people still need to pay fees on the token, as if the token isn't entirely propped up by speculative value.

>>50056654
>>50056588
>>50056502
>>50056388
>>50056354
>>50056278
>>50056266
>>50056250
>>50056227
>>50056077
>>50056043
>>50056003
>>50055993
>>50055705
>>50055646
>>50055553
>>50055529
Hey retards LINK will never surpass its ATH in bitcoin Ethereum is dead thanks for listening

>>50056654
you either get that link is a bet against crypto being nothing but a speculative ponzi or you don't buy link, there's really no in between there. that doesn't mean the bets a guarantee, its exactly why its risky but still potentially huge reward, but to compare link to an exchange token shows a gross misunderstanding of the value proposition. just say you don't think smart contract adoption will even begin to advance over the next few years, sell your link, and move on. you're free anon, you're free.

>>50056654
how do you still not get this part we are dca'ing in here
none of us is saying link cant crash or must go up, we are saying it can go up here and we spread our risk by accumulating here
as i stated multiple times now another link crash would make me happy as it means more stinkies in my cold storage, how is that possibly cope

>>50056761
The comparison is one about how holders suggest their particular investment has some immunity to the laws of market physics. It's actually a comical suggestion that is already observably false. If the global economy keeps tanking or is recessionary over the next few years you cannot reasonably expect price explosion out of LINK. I won't even get into the fact we're all talking about this when staking still isn't out and when it is it will be the crappy beta version that the last round of coping baggies were saying it wouldn't be.

>>50046784
ONE
DOLLAR

>>5004678
Bruv LINK is a certified piece of shite.

11$ LINK incoming. NEXO completes it's rugpull. Celsius gets saved by the Goldman kikes triggering a relief ralley and a FOMO rally which brings us to $16-20 LINK just before staking in early August.

LPL will at least 10x by EOY.

And so it shall be as it is written.

>>50056278
Top was also 69k for Btc as well

>>50056839
who the fuck is arguing link has immunity to market physics? where is the strawman, point him out. what is your argument, that everyone should exit all markets, time the bottom, and jump back in whenever jaime dimon or joe biden tells you to? you sound emotional anon, like I said just sell your link, you're free.

>>50055705
Dis chart mean Steak in 40days or less.

Anons need to align thier assets accordingly.

>>50056994
no anon, market physics. you must sell all assets and hold only cash until jim cramer tells you to buy again.

>>50056003
This is bullish as fuk, if the majority of positions for link are short then that’s when you buy

>>50056868
How will initial staking impact LPL staking APY, since LinkPool will be staking LINK and earning whatever the mystery incentives are? How would you estimate the additional percentage points?

>>50052387
Don't worry fren kikes will save the market.

>>50056979
The other anon did, you dense cunt. It's everywhere in these threads, "LINK will actually do really well when the global economy is imploding!!!" I really don't care if you exit all markets or what you do, but I think suggesting LINK is going to perform very well in such an environment is provably retarded cope. DCA fine but get a grip because the foreseeable future is grim and LINK is evidently, demonstrably not an exception.

>>50053088
Don't worry fren ftx and Goldman kikes will save the market.

>>5005494
Don't worry fren kikes will save the market.

>>50057067
really well is relative you daft cunt, everything else is just fomo and hindsight bias thinking you can always be in the best performing asset. but shit even if you think you're a pro trader, this is still the time to be building a position back in link, so I don't even know what the fuck you're even arguing about.

>>50057034
LPL apy is essentially guaranteed to be 5% minimum, likely to be several points higher.

>>50057159
Don't worry fren kikes will save the market.

>>50056754
Don't worry fren ftx and Goldman kikes will save the market.

>>50057159
you know i just dont get against what we are arguing here
how is the position of dca here, somehow not understandable to half the board, where in here did anyone make the claim that link cant go down

>>50057239
Fren, kikes will save us all.

>>50057210
and now the forum sliding shills have arrived i see
really /biz/ has degraded considerably in the past 2 years
trolling newfag tourists and fudding them out of gains at the top is all fun and games when it happens for 3 months but doing it for 2 years straight is turning the board into total shit

>>50056354
Fren z kikes to the rescue

>>50056266
Fren relax kikes will save us all.

>>50056502
Yes pls

>>50057264
Fren you will be saved.

>>50057067
Economic collapses are orchestrated by elites, elites always progress their plans by causing shit, whether it be war, “pandemics”, false flags or economic depressions. They need disruptive events so they can implement their plans because under the disruptive event they cause minimal disruption in their implementations as everyone is already disrupted by other stuff that’s going on. This is why paradigm shifting tech like Chainlink is the best thing to invest in when shit hits the fan, this is the disruptive tech they will be setting the ground work for during the shit so when it’s all over they flip the switch with minimal disruption.

>>50055705
lol literally half of circulating tokens got moved of exchange in the past days since the staking announcement, thats pretty brutal
can you update the graph to today or is this a picture you saved?

>>50056502
yes do share, not that i trust those way to smooth graphs but more chart porn is always nice to browse

>>50057239
I think a lot of it is projections, anons that rode link from the bottom to the top and back down again, reflexively arguing against anyone they perceive as a perma bull because they're bitter about their own potential missed opportunity cost. I get it because its human nature to have those thoughts, but you either do something about it or you push them out of your mind, when you let it eat you up inside that's how you get things like people capitulating the bottom, thinking
>this time I'll take my profits and swing and make it
when all they had to do was wait.

>>50055705
what the absolute fuck

>>50055705
wait upon closer inspection this graph is wrong
if you take all 3 bulges of link withdrawals you end up with more link moved off exchange in the past 3 months then there is floating supply and then there is the massive amount of link in cold storage
what the fuck, is glassnode inaccurate or did some exchanges really did do the nasty with their link supplies

>>50057483
last i saw on viewbase before it mysteriously disappeared is that there were 110M LINK on exchanges. either viewbase is a complete scam with the numbers they reported (likely scenario) or there has to be pretty much zero liquidity left on exchanges. if any anons have their shit still on exchanges get it the fuck off asap.

>>50057375
>>50057483
>>50057543
>>50057568
best i can do is a longer timeline

>>50057568
Once staking is live and all the coins move off exchanges it’s going to create such and upswing. Remember all coins on exchanges are IOU’s, so when it is sent off exchange to IOU is redeemed for the real coin.the exchanges use the coins to profit and give you an iou as a promise that you can redeem the coin later.

>>50057568
also, unregulated exchanges notwithstanding I'm not concerned about kraken/gemini/coinbase tier exchanges, coinbase at least doesn't offer absurd leverage

>>50057624
does it give you an actual count of how much link is in those bulges
on the other graph you can manually count the days and get a reasonable estimate, but this graph is not calculable
but those swings are huge how much link was ever on exchanges to even begin with

>>50047341
why do you freaks never account for recession?

>>50057697
before viewbase went down they were reporting 110M but that site was probably a scam

Its my position that link is somewhat negatively correlated to bitcoin and eth. I think that in the last bear market a good part of their capitulation was rebalancing into projects like link rather than cashing out. This also explains why link had a lukewarm bull run as link holders rebalanced into bitcoin and eth, in addition to the known shorting problem that defic and cefi caused.

With that in mind i'd like to explain a scenario i haven't seen many people put forward. Assume the above is correct and link is going to begin its bullrun during the bitcoin/eth bear. At the same as shorts being liquidated, and 25 million tokens being taken out of circulation (75 million locked in staking minus 50 million released in a new round of fundraising). How do you think the market is going to react to a lone green project in a sea of red? I'd say an awful lot of institutional and retail investors would see that and rebalance their portfolios into link.

We have the potential for a perfect storm here.

>>50057737
well thats a number i can believe, we all know massive amounts of link are in cold storage
but lets even double the amount from viewbase and say its 220M even then you cant explain the glassnode graph, the swing are just too big
how accurate is glassnode on alts? maybe they are miscounting exchanges moving coins to different addresses that still belong to the exchange

>>50055248
No offence dude, but you’ve typed a lot of words to basically say
>it could go up but it could go down

>>50057849
>25 million tokens being taken out of circulation (75 million locked in staking minus 50 million released in a new round of fundraising).
this has been discussed before and it isn't fud but due to the setup of early staking where long term holders get rewarded those 75 mil staked link will come mostly from cold storage that hasn't touched an exchange in ages if ever
so there isn't really much link that is removed from trading liquidity with that move

>>50057849
but anon didn't you hear there's a recession assets can't go up in a recession
srsly though everything is aligning, you even have people in every thread telling you every breakout is a sucker's rally

>>50057905
https://archive ( d o t ) ph/MQaVW
>Bull Market Never Ended for Analysts Wedded to 100% Price Rally Calls

is it delusion? We've got the rest of the year, and smartcon, to find out

>>50057888
That won't be the case for the node part of the staking incentives.
Nodes will have their own incentive for staking and this will mean those node will have to get the tokens one way or another.
This should remove some liquidity and we should get a bigger network in Q1 2023 capable of using more than 100 million of staked LINK.

>>50057624
>all the other big exchange removals were at tops

>>50058041
shhh, don't you see, they're already celebrating the upcoming "perfect storm"

>>50058041
and now the inverse is happening. we're 90% down and getting a massive exchange removal, seems significant

>>50058217
Exactly, this is nothing like before, both in terms of volume of withdrawals and the price action preceding them. It's clearly caused directly by the staking announcement details a few weeks ago.

link and every crypto expect bitcoin are going to zero you absolute retards

>>50058466
>link and every crypto expect bitcoin are going to zero you absolute retards

>>50058096
shhh, its just a suckers rally, it will fail like all the rest

My buy order is set to 1 dollar LINK for 100K USD. Good day

>>50047341
Didn't read but 2 lines.
Cope and seethe. Fud posting.

>>50047701
What the fuck does a temperature standard have to do with anything? Fucking retard.

>>50050310

They literally show the gas prices and gas costs on the site.

>>50046952

Never changes. Not even for LINK. For everything. Been in crypto for 8 years. Seen this in normal markets too.

Nobody ever is satisfied with the bottom. Not saying now is the bottom, but even if it hits 3$ people will wait for $1. This happens every single time. Same for BTC, ETH, anything.

>>50060909
They don't show you how much nodes are making from oracle rewards (i.e. subsidies) vs. fee revenue, so we have no idea how profitable they actually are.

>>50054943

Yeah? And if it goes there you will have a new thesis for why $1 is possible and its good to wait. I’ve seen this over rand over you faggots can always have a reason it will go lower. Buying and averaging down is the way to go noob.
If it hits 11k/$3 you’re new thesis will be how the FED this and the delaying of ETH that and the hack of This will and the fact that BTC dominance will rise first and LINK that means $1-2 is going to be the bottom.

>>50057293
>>50057375
Here you are. Will reply with the only other missing page of actual info

>>50061812
As I said, kind of a piece of shit but more info on his price predictions anyway. I think the analysis is worthwhile/interesting at least

>>50046923
>if normies say it won't happen that means it will!!!!
bitcoin is never going to a billion dollars

>>50047341
Literally everything going on is different. Your coin isn't special enough to change the entire macroeconomic situation

>>50061873
>Literally everything going on is different. Your coin isn't special enough to change the entire macroeconomic situation

>>50062011
Linkies used to be chill but you've all turned into real bitter faggots since you missed your chance to sell at $50

>doesn't realize it'll never hit ath again

>>50062032
>projecting this hard
you missed your chance to buy at 20c

>>50062032
>Linkies used to be chill but you've all turned into real bitter faggots since you missed your chance to sell at $50
Who said I was ever selling fag?

chainshit in a nutshell is basically
>same slides for five years
>daily 300+ spoon threads
>blogposts out the yingyang
>the largest shill presence crypto has ever seen
all because niggers cannot understand that data cannot into different systems without decentralized oracle networks
literally a faux Dickens tale of two data worlds: centralized and decentralized and they do not talk to each other unless they are already present in the system e.g. TWAP oracles that already have access.

you know, crypto to me is about equality but not in a muh gender this and that it is about profit sharing your data. so what if a big data company offers you a free product that benefits you. Your data has made them one of the biggest and most wealthy companies in the world. That wealth is built off of the backs of innocent hardworking niggers who have since become completely addicted to the memes and the information stream. The information stream is the means of exploitation in the modern world and everyone exposed to the stream has had their wealth – their value – forcibly extracted from them by means of societal exploitation. Your trust in web2.0, and I am writing from a time before you trusted anything on the interwebs, has led you, me, and every other nigger faggot to become vulnerable to inflation.
If profit sharing of your data, something that everyone naturally generates by virtue of being (you), was something nigger faggots demanded of web 2.0 companies like GOOGLE FACEBOOK TWITTER and their ilk maybe you would have a surf board to ride the eibbs and flows of economic waves.

>inb4 rebuttals and but but maybes

I rest my case.

>>50055173
Very well put.

>>50046784
>price going down is like going back in time

99% of fud is born from this exact same retarded logic.

>>50046784
if this thread stays alive long enough op about to look dum

>>50062456
>>the largest shill presence crypto has ever seen
lol where?
On /biz/ anything Link related is 90% fud.

>>50047341
>You simply have everything TA and fundamentals aligned.
Except 2018 was in a macro/stocks bullrun and now everything is contracting. We've never seen btc nor link in a recession.
>You can easily spot retail niggas because they all change their fucking targets ON THE GO.
We're all retail

>>50064137
but we're not all niggers

>>50064137
>We've never seen btc nor link in a recession.
BTC spent over half a year in a recession immediately after it was born.

>>50046784
doesnt look to good for mr svenson

50x return bad

not buying your shitbags stinkies, maybe at ico price i will consider

Just gonna remind all you delusional bagholders that your token is not needed and no amount of wall of text about staking will change this fact.
There was a speculative pump on the value of chainlink oracle that has already long since happened. It “works”, ignoring the fact that they have failed many times and have been used to syphon money afterexploits.
You may get some of your money back if the general market stops pumping but link is clearly old and dying already.

>>50057568
Viewbase is entirely unreliable. I've been glancing at it over th years and there's consistently 0 changes for certain exchanges for specific time intervals that you can select on the UI.

I would nlt take any data from Viewbase as gospel

>le perfect storm
>le short squeeze
>le bear market coin
>dumps even further
turns out RLC was the one, you literally can't make this shit up

>>50046784
You guys think we’ll get a bounce to 23k-25k or is it gonna be down only from now on?