/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50035876
burn doesn't even matter as much as the hype about it burning

Ok bro. Here's your (You)

>>50035889
This.

>>50035876
Worthless calculation because it does not factor in CEX burn taxes which are key to the moon mission.

Do couldve been a hero; instead he’ll die penniless and alone, suiciding at 40 as the remains of his rekt asshole no longer function after decades of forced sodomy.

>>50035876
I hate Do Kwon so much, this all could have been over months ago if he's just implemented the burn tax.

>>50035903
yes I'm hoping cz adds a 2-3 trillion burn on top of it to get the ball rolling

>>50035876
This assumes that the exchanges (which represent 95% of all the volume) will VOLUNTERILY participate in the burn, since the protocol does not apply to exchange volume.
Now re-run your number with just wallet to wallet transactions....
exact'y

>>50035876
What kind of retard math is this?

>>50036213
they will all opt in because they are huge whales of lunc themselves

>>50036213
Well it’s an interesting idea. Simply because if they do put in the burn tax, it may negatively affect volume, but if they don’t it will absolutely affect hype and kill volume. Maybe they don’t care either way but there is 0 fucking reason for CZ not to implement it. Just that alone may be enough for others to follow suit.

>>50036213
>taking financial advice from someone who can’t even spell
Step your game up, anon. It’s embarrassing.

>>50035876
Is UST still attached or can do kwon sink the whole chain out of spite again?

I dont see any math just a wallah here ya go

>>50036366
>cant attack the logic
>attacks spellingjjk0m

>>50036376
It's June 28th and 30 days ago was around May 28 if t0 then you can easily burn it to 10b especially if starting at 6t last month. If you think in terms of 6 or so weeks ago with the t0 then you can easily get to 1078 as it is with or without burning in the near future to 5 to 12 days ago

>>50035876
I hope they burn the supply down further to 1B; I want to be a billionaire. But if they stick with 10 billion, then I'll have to settle with being a mere multi-millionaire instead.

>>50036631
So you have 25M LUNC?

>>50036425
Bad spelling = logic null and void

>>50036726
I have around 30 million LUNC.

>>50036801
> I have around 30 million LUNC.
Absolutely gmi.

>>50035876
>6,500,000 million LUNC
>getting burned at a rate of 15 tps
>for 3 and a half years

There aren't enough smart contracts in all of defi

So they get rid of a bunch of coins and then they go up in value because ???

How is this not just a reverse-split scam

>>50036898

Because supply and demand. More money chasing fewer coins

>>50036425
Your point was retarded too, but I didn’t feel the need to engage with you on that. You’ll see.

>>50038111
I’m pulling down crazy digits in all these lunc threads too. I can’t wait to see all these fudders in full dilation mode after the will of KEK leaves their nupuccis reamed out.

>>50036366
>>50038111
>>50038200
Checked

>>50038686
Strong meme number vibes on this coin, anon. I hope you have a bag.

>>50037663
>less supply

Why would demand be greater than 0. It's a ponzi coin that has been rugpulled

>>50039150
Speculation

>>50036553
Someone decipher this

>>50036213
Had to get it on

>>50035876
Assuming the same trading volume everyday for ~1000 days, right?

>>50039180
>fools have been reset to 0

Lol. Hope some of yall make it out of this alive.

Did some burn calculations myself, I calculated the chances of my new toaster burning my toast to a golden brown crisp. And let me tell you, I like my chances.

>>50036213
>Exchanges participate in the burn protocol
Is this even a thing? Do exchanges ever do this?

>>50039444
Trips of truth. May KEK bless your toaster anon.