/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50019209
What do you mean? Link please

Did Sergey update the readme?

>>50019322
Great for beautiful looks!

>>50019233
>>50019322
>>50019333
Checked

pcs is using keepers to automate its prediction games. about 0.1 link spent per minute

>>50019209
Good morning, sir! A fellow LINK marine, I see! My name is Dan Christopher from California, United States office of Chainlink Labs. OP is totally right with respect to the GitHub update of LINK you know.
We are only months away from one of the biggest feature releases of the project life. The feature coming out soon which is called “CyberCode 2.0„ testnet version. As an insider I know you folks have no idea what/the importance of CyberCode 2.0 is gonna be for LINK when the alpha releases around the end of April next year (give or take a few months) so I will spoonfeed you out of kindness of heart:

CyberCode 2.0 secures the ledger cryptographically to encode transactions at 20x magnitude of legacy infrastructure. It achieves this by taking blockchain transactions to the BbC-2022 layer and parsing them through the node network incentivized by super linear sequencing which Sergey said is very close to finish line. This activity is incentivized through semi-permeable staking allowing LINK token holders to benefit for verifying data both on main chain and Blockchain Byzantine Consensus 2022 layer.

The obvious benefits of super fast transaction speeds also brings exponential economies of scale! What this means sir is if farmer has 500 Kg cow for sale, he can put the beast to market on the blockchain to verify the weight in a trust less system faster than global SWIFT system. Soon any business who wants to stay relevant will have to buy LINK to have access to CyberCode 2.0 feature. A unique proposition. Those who don’t use this system (powered by LINK) will get left behind.

Scammer motherfuckers want you to think that banks and other organizations are not currently fulling their bags with cheap LINK as we speak. In other words, if you hold more than 50 LINK right now, you already made it. Immediately when we breach the $8 resistance it’ll be too late for you. You have been warned, sir. So go buy many LINK for you dream to come true.

>>50019570
Wrote all this shit text nobody is going to read and nobody is going to buy your useless token. Fuck off

>>50019209
token not needed

>>50019631

>>50019209
I see they have coded $6.40

>>50019580
Don’t listen to this benchode. He is a scammer.

>>50019209
They still use "master" as the name of the main repository branch. Hello, it's 2022, everybody knows using the word "master" is racist.

>>50019580
You're right, chainlink is worthless dead end trash

>>50019843
Sergey mandates no woke shit in his company. He hires the roasties to throw off the press

>>50019888
Checked
Also, not really true, I reached a technical interview stage of recruitment for a position at chainlink labs (I got no offer and those motherfuckers didn't even let me know BTW, just ghosted) and on each step there were disclaimers how they're an "equal opportunity employer" and all that shit

Also, I actually looked at their github and there is real news there, there's new docs for chain configuration, it's another step towards CCIP:
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/commit/853223cfb363a040a16fd52fa40ca332c76e5723#diff-ed97b806cc8d5a740609f925aad9014e8c916832befd26fd8fe632682349c90b

>>50019580
>BbC-2022 layer
Are you really too stupid to recognize when someone is on your side? Chainlink haters really aren't the smartest bunch huh