[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 35 KB, 278x276, 1_-WTl3O02G3P9u5yW7O2LVg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49983174 No.49983174 [Reply] [Original]

LINK is BY FAR the worst asset of the bull run
>hold, team dumping on your head every month, lose
>can’t even participate in the defi that it propels:
>put link in aave, get liquidated
>put link in bancor, lose 50% because their IL protection is a scam that just prints BNT and causes more IL for everyone
>stake on Celsius, get rugged

stinkies, when will they learn?

it truly is the worst asset of the bullrun and /biz/ is in large part responsible for it all

>> No.49983192

What brought all this LINK info to the front of your mind, anon? What has you thinking about Chainlink at this particular time?

>> No.49983194

>>49983174
>>put link in aave, get liquidated
I didn't have this problem

>> No.49983196

>>49983174
Defi and yield farming was a complete ponzi scheme, and I'm surprised any of you thought it was a good idea to get into during a bull market.

>> No.49983212

>>49983196
Yield farming, while pool 1s still existed, weren't ponzis, just unsustainable

>> No.49983252

>>49983174
>put link in bancor, lose 50%
i didn't have this problem

>> No.49983284

>>49983174
>>49983192
>>49983194
>>49983196
>>49983212
Never selling
Just bought 100k more Link tokens
Didn't read btw

>> No.49983298

>>49983174
If this was true, your propaganda would be unnecessary. Nobody makes threads shitting on shitcoins, because their shittiness is readily apparent.

>> No.49983317

>>49983174
>outperforms eth and btc
>worst asset of the bull run
nice fud, retard

>> No.49983349

>>49983298
the jews really really really want biz to sell link before it takes off

>> No.49983399
File: 34 KB, 752x254, Screen Shot 2022-06-26 at 4.15.50 pm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49983399

>>49983349
Did you know that OG LINK wallets have actually been "tagged" with a small amount of AMB token so that they can be tracked more easily? Token can't be sold or traded. This shit goes deep.

>> No.49983409

>>49983349
Why tho? What we own is peanuts to (((them)))

>> No.49983418

>>49983399
What
I also got that (((coin))). Does that make me og?

>> No.49983434

>>49983409
No retail at all was supposed to get on board, let alone a group of smart mouthed politically incorrect incels.
If /biz/ was a rainbow tranny get together that kept its head down and didn't rock the boat, LINK would probably be at $500 already.

>> No.49983436

>>49983317
by what metric? You're down 85 percent on both of those pairs
>YEAH WHILE I BOUGHT THE BOTTOM
Huffing copium

>> No.49983450

>>49983418
It means you hold enough or have been around long enough to have gotten their interest.

>> No.49983451

>>49983174
Rent free
Find a hobby you freak

>> No.49983453

>>49983436
>you’re down huge based on my arbitrary timeline
Zoom out

>> No.49983483

>>49983453
I bought fantom at the bottom and held all the way up and all the way down, but does this mean I'm a smarter investor than linkies?
Your performance doesn't fucking matter if you don't sell anything dipshit. This is how I know linkies are really fucking miserable because we're back to the "zoom out" copium. don't think I read that once until link hit 30

>> No.49983507

>>49983483
I can't imagine having the energy to go into Fantom threads and discuss it with strangers, because I don't own any so why would I give a shit?
So what makes Chainlink so special to you?

>> No.49983513

>>49983450
But I only have 7k and I bought in 2019

>> No.49983523

>>49983513
They know what 7k LINK will be worth. Do you?

>> No.49983537

>>49983523
No. I’m stupid lol

>> No.49983546

>>49983507
Because fantom hasn't spammed their shitcoin since 2017 claiming this is a fantom board while their shitcoin and then launch into full retard mode blaming nexo for their abysmal performance. You fags deserve all of the bullshit you're getting, yet you all have to cope with a fact that you could have sold link for eth early on and done MILES better and rebought 5x your stack. God that must suck. Meanwhile sergey dumped 20% of link on the market last year, how thoughtful of him.

OP hit the nail on the head

>> No.49983553
File: 16 KB, 336x150, Screen Shot 2022-06-26 at 4.30.06 pm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49983553

>>49983537
And they don't want "stupid" people with half a billion dollars.

>> No.49983574

>>49983546
So you're really angry about link posting on this board since 2017. What were some of the projects that you cared about on /biz/ in 2017? Let's reminisce, I was here then too, so I'm sure we will have plenty to talk about.

>> No.49983621

>>49983574
>trying to change the subject this hard
not sure what your end game is stinky, but this is just sad at this point. While you convince yourself your inflationary shitcoin is going to be worth 81k one day. Jesus how hopeless can you be

>> No.49983646

>>49983621
You know I've read some variation of "you linkies have been shitting up the board since 2017" probably 50 different times at this point and not once, not one single time, has one of the people saying that actually been able to describe anything that was happening on /biz/ at that time.
But you were here, anon, so let's talk about it. Remember Signatum?

>> No.49983661
File: 14 KB, 236x180, 8bc59115817f254f8e75449b7ef42093--reading-club-february-.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49983661

>>49983409
they arent concerned with getting the extra money; theyre concerned with keeping the money *away* from people like us, in places like this

>> No.49983711

>>49983436
i did buy the local bottom, tho. very happy with link so far

>> No.49983726

I wonder why someone would come to /biz/ to fud LINK and then, when asked why they are fudding LINK, say it's revenge for LINK's presence on this board since 2017, but then instantly flee the thread the moment they are asked to confirm they were actually here at that time.
What a mystery.

>> No.49983730

It's really stupid to buy any less than 1 million link... 1 million has always been the suicide stack... any less is pointless... you missed your chance! Cope!

>> No.49983733

>>49983646
Ok so your goal is to prove
>nuh uh, we weren't shitting up the board and you're a newfag so there you go!
I'll give you this -- link wasn't really that popular in 2017, I don't think /biz/ really started going after it until after the bullrun. That's when this became a "link board" from faggots who kept spamming to read the whitepaper (when was the last time you read that?) and kept screaming $1000 EOY. This was before BSC though so people didn't deploy as many scamcoins so no wonder LINK shilling was at all time high.

So you can either A) keep trying to catch me as some newfag parroting things or B) stop trying to change the narrative like some jew.
>uhh this is a link board
>but we haven't been constantly talking about it since the dawn of link
pick one and only one, but you're honsetly just doing yourself a disservice at this point

>>49983726
yeah you caught me I'm a paid jew to fud LINK and that's the only reason we didn't hit 1000 EOY

>> No.49983750

>>49983726
Especially as at least 2/3 Link threads are started by fudders and usual consist of
>DUMPS THE MOST PUMPS THE LEAST
>it's over, it's over, it's over
>schwabposting
Even if this weren't the case, sorry to have kicked off one of the millions of BSC shitcoin thread I suppose.

>> No.49983779
File: 700 KB, 862x868, Screen Shot 2019-09-18 at 9.41.31 pm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49983779

>>49983733
>link wasn't really that popular in 2017
Oh dear.
Well it was worth a shot in the dark, wasn't it. You can always come back next thread and pretend this never happened.

>> No.49983793

>>49983733
PS: Coinmetro shilling, V-ID I think was still around, and you had to buy all your shittokens on idex (I believe I bought that ERC-20 BTC that everyone thought would be huge, I can't for the life of me remember the name) So again, stop trying to catch me like a fag

>>49983779
It was 5 years ago, people were too busy losing their minds over things that were going up :)

>> No.49983809
File: 137 KB, 850x446, 2019-04-21-00-47-28-092015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49983809

>>49983779
thats exactly what they and their acolytes have been doing for hundreds of hundreds of years

read this quote?

>> No.49983836

>>49983809
>the jews are simply doing all these things to suppress chainlink while other people become millionaires overnight on doge coins and make healthy gains that beat link
>certainly that nobody wants to buy it
Maybe i should bust out my smug anime folder, paid for by Pfizer

>> No.49983866

>>49983793
You weren't here 5 years ago, anon. You've made that perfectly clear.

>> No.49983888
File: 259 KB, 640x333, 1541718034990.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49983888

>>49983836
the point is to identify a particular type of argumentative style its ubiquitous in link threads

>> No.49983905

>>49983866
Nice dubs, but nice cope too. Is this your argument now? "correct the record?" So what's your argument then? Linkies have been well behaved for 5 years and thus everyone else is wrong? I've seen a lot of people throw this around but of all the jewish tactics I've seen, this really takes the cake

>>49983888
Oh just like gamestop! I'll give you a pass though,checking those trips

>> No.49983941

>>49983174
You're never getting my LINK

>> No.49983962

>>49983905
kek you're the 50pbtid retard aren't you. fuck off

>> No.49983975

>>49983905
I just think it's strange that I often come up against the argument that LINK fud is revenge for LINK holder behavior on /biz/, at a time when the fudder wasn't even on /biz/.
Which leaves the question wide open of why the person is actually fudding, and why they are inclined to lie about their justification for doing so, and why they all seem to be reading from a script or at the very least, guidelines.

>> No.49984001

>>49983399
I have that shit as well, very annoying

>> No.49984033

>>49983409
The governments only job is to keep as much of the population employment and paying taxes as physically possible. This applies to you making it as much as it does Jamal collecting welfare.

>> No.49984043

>>49984033
employed*
Before someone accuses me of being some ESL nigger.

>> No.49984053

Its over stinkies you are the laughing stock of the board

>> No.49984067
File: 166 KB, 355x379, 1656256664163.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49984067

>>49983962
What do you mean? I'm just taking some time to have a friendly conversation with the investors of the best performing asset on /biz/

>>49983975
>be the most cocky asset holder
>perform like shit
>come up with a grand conspiracy as to why you aren't all millionaires
>deflect all criticism by trying to prove someone wasn't on /biz/
>why are you fudding us? Oy vey we peaceful link holders would never do anything like that
I was mainly an /smg/ poster other than BTC on 2017 and didn't get into shitcoins until somewhere in 2018-2019. Sorry I don't know what to tell you bro. You're right. I'm just some dumb newfag and clearly the token down -85% from usd, btc, and eth are smarter than me.
>why are you here
Shitposting gives me life and its Sunday morning. Why else would I still be in this cesspit. Why are any of us?

>> No.49984087

>>49984067
>all those errors in my post
sorry, I swapped to my phone to bust out a smug anime girl. My external drive is in storage. Or my overlords fucked up the script. I'm sure you have your own theory

>> No.49984099

>>49984067
>I was mainly an /smg/ poster other than BTC on 2017 and didn't get into shitcoins until somewhere in 2018-2019
So you're saying you were on /biz/ back then?

>> No.49984117

>>49984099
>still beating this horse to death
Anon, I want you to tell me that you don't believe link posters have been shitting up this board for 5 years now. If you really believe that. I'll admit my lie for you if you tell me that you believe it

>> No.49984150

>>49984117
I'm just trying to pin down your story. Say I had some vendetta against Tesla, and you asked me why, and I said "Oh the Tesla holders were such faggots on the electric car forums back in 2015" but then it turned out I didn't actually use the electric car forums in 2015.
That would be strange, wouldn't it? That my reason for being so angry at Tesla was based on online behavior that I wasn't even around for? Wouldn't you find that highly unusual?

>> No.49984174

>>49984150
Oh like gamestop! makes sense, everyone else who shit talks them is crazy. I see now :)

>> No.49984194

>>49984174
That's not really a reply to what I said, is it anon.

>> No.49984202

>>49984194
he could be a bot

>> No.49984223

>>49984194
Certainly is. You can make that accusation on anybody (including gamestop posters). So it's a bad faith argument to presume that everybody who is shit talking your darling project and references them not being here is talking out their teeth. Why do I bring gamestop up? Because it's a similar level of delusion. I want you to understand this: you're being delusional.

>>49984202
>bots are fudding my chainlink to suppress the price to accumulate it
meds, stat.

>> No.49984240

>>49984223
>talking out their teeth
That's an interesting piece of vernacular. What part of the world is that from?

>> No.49984252

>>49984240
ask to describe how a particular 20sec piece of music feels, ive heard bots cant do it

>> No.49984253

>>49984240
Its a bulgarian gypsy

>> No.49984293

>>49984240
Israeli. I'm playing GBO2, so I'm just posting between spawns. I'm sure you can figure out what I meant to write. So just to bring us back home
>actually, us linkies are being falsely persecuted
>we've been the most well behaved posters in /biz/ history
>how could you know if you can't come up with my curated list of proof that shows you were here since the dawn of man
>you must be a bot or a shill since nobody would ever make these bold accusations against us peaceful and intelligent link posters
Got that right? or something else you wanna try and use?

>>49984252
nigger if I really believed bots are at this level of shitposting on /biz/ then I wouldn't trust a single thing I've read on here and would promptly leave.

>> No.49984315

>>49984293
I'm still mostly interested in this aspect
>>49984150
in that your justification for all of this sentiment is online behavior that you didn't even witness. That just strikes me as extremely unusual. "Oh I hate those guys because of how they behaved on an internet site that I wasn't using at the time".
I just can't make sense of it at all.

>> No.49984327

>>49984315
Really? I'm more focused on your deflection as to why you don't think linkies haven't been shitting this place up for years. Come on, elaborate

>> No.49984338
File: 60 KB, 1256x459, sonic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49984338

>>49984293
well youd better believe it. didnt you see the limited hangout public version of the new bots? theyre def capable of fudding biz

Why? because the people running these bots dont want people who come to places like this to have money

>> No.49984349

>>49984327
>I'll give you this -- link wasn't really that popular in 2017, I don't think /biz/ really started going after it until after the bullrun.
You yourself said that LINK wasn't that popular in 2017. So why would you have a grudge against 2017 LINKies when it wasn't even that popular back then? Surely you should have more of a grudge against the Digimarines, or PosW shills, or REQ holders.

>> No.49984355

>>49984349
Because you started in 2017, and gradually got more obnoxious. Is it that hard to grasp?
>hehe so we didn't start shitting up the board until 2018, I told you that you were wrong
Is this it? This is your angle? Weak argument and you know it.

>> No.49984362

>>49984355
So I need to clarify if you were here in 2017/2018, because I'm really confused now. Are you now saying that yes, you were here at those times?

>> No.49984363

>>49984338
Interesting but I've always thought this shit seemed way off, so I'm not worried. I'm certainly not convinced from this type of shit that /biz/ is being flooded with bots for the sake of suppressing things like LINK, GME, whatever shitcoin of the week we're mad at, but you should probably leave if you think this place has good DD and you're missing out on it because of bots

>> No.49984371

>>49984362
Nope I didn't start browsing until 2022

>> No.49984379

>>49984338
btw what's this site? I keep seing it everywhere and can never find a link to it. If you wouldn't mind

>> No.49984380

>>49984371
Anon...

>> No.49984399

>>49984380
I don't have to keep making the same claim over and over again. Just as a reminder
>actually, us linkies are being falsely persecuted
>we've been the most well behaved posters in /biz/ history
>how could you know if you can't come up with my curated list of proof that shows you were here since the dawn of man
>you must be a bot or a shill since nobody would ever make these bold accusations against us peaceful and intelligent link posters
>oy vey my detective hat is tingling

>> No.49984401
File: 547 KB, 1195x847, 1650009917215.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49984401

>>49984363
leave and go where? this is internet-wide manipulation and one day itll be recognized as a fact just like spying on citizens calls and data used to be considered crazy

>> No.49984429
File: 223 KB, 1024x1024, 20220622_142754.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49984429

>>49983174
>stakes with a 3rd party
>cries

they never learn

>> No.49984431

>>49984399
Don't you think it's strange that you're justifying your animosity towards LINK holders on the basis of how they behaved on a website you weren't using at the time?

>> No.49984433
File: 43 KB, 474x638, comfy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49984433

>>49984401
Outside. I'm one to talk though. I just come here to jerk off about the state of the world anymore

>> No.49984459

>>49984431
But I was here, you just don't want to accept that I was. What's more strange is you refuse to accept or deny the spam of link and how half of the board loved link and the other half vilified it. I know it's hard to accept you're the bad guy though sometimes. Nobody likes to be criticized when they have enough people telling them that the other party is wrong

>> No.49984480

>>49984379
openai playground, its p2w tho

>> No.49984487

>>49984433
linkies are cocky because they're the only large group in crypto that is up massively and at least on the verge of making it. No normies didn't buy doge and shiba before they took off, no they didn't get in btc early only hyper autists did, no they didn't get in eth early either. that's why there's so much energy about link on this board, a huge swath of retail actually fucking got in early for once and are still sitting on a collective 35x roughly from the bottom, which is insane.

there's a battle for the heart of the board though, the ones who actually did buy early only need anywhere from a 10-100x to feel comfy and "make it", meanwhile for the majority of poorfags here who didn't touch crypto until 2020/2021, they still need minimum 1000x to even dream of making it. so for them link is a waste of time, and I think a lot of these types probably fud it for that reason. even though link still probably has a 1000x left in it as well, just you won't see it for at least another few years, maybe 2030.

>> No.49984492

>>49984459
>I didn't start browsing until 2022
Thanks for your time, anon. See you in the next thread.

>> No.49984532
File: 47 KB, 564x400, 1510620977992.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49984532

>>49984492
Sheesh. And I'm apparently the bot

>> No.49984568

>>49984480
Oh damn. I was thinking of putting all the posts in this thread and copying responses and see how far it gets me. Thanks though anon

>>49984487
>on the verge
were on the verge* but well reasoned post considering the state of the thread thus far. I don't believe LINK has a 1000x in it that any other asset doesn't have though. LINK probably will have some room to really grow once we get to the tokenized asset market future, but at that point all parties involved will run. That's a 10+ year hold though for something like a tokenized bond market. Anyways, you'll make it friend. Good luck

>> No.49984630
File: 20 KB, 248x242, 6967A7E7-13EE-4B88-9351-59949ACC839B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49984630

>>49984399
>20pbtid
You’ve posted 20 times in a single Link thread, yet you claim your big gripe is too many Link threads on biz

You know you can filter Link threads, don’t you?
However, you start Link threads and keep bumping them over and over for some strange reason, which is very odd for someone complaining about Link “shitting up the board”.
Funny, everyone who starts these threads uses those exact same words.

>> No.49984631
File: 80 KB, 1398x984, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49984631

>>49984568
kek, god i hope i don't write like this

>> No.49984660

>>49984380
Hes a jew he just admitted it, why are you arguing with it. They absolutely hate when goyim make money so he wants you to sell. End of story

>> No.49984686

>>49984631
Never selling infact in buying more. Im going to need a lot of money to donate to Palestine.

>> No.49984701

>>49984630
Already addressed this, it's sunday morning, I enjoy kicking linkies like a diseased puppy, and thus far I've been arguing with retards who think I started browsing this board in 2022 and am Jewish and/or a bot. It's really fun.

>>49984660
>>49984686
You failed, come on anon. you made it one post

>> No.49984758

Just a comfy marine in a comfy world

>> No.49984790

LINK is a fundamentally misunderstood asset. I will endeavor to purchase more at these prices.

>> No.49984848

>>49984568
*still on the verge, you realize even the poorest of linkies who bought 4 years ago are sitting on 50k+? No normalfag has that in crypto, and while this may not be the bottom for the cycle, it most likely doesn't have more than another 50% leg down even factoring in all the recession boogeyman talk, and that's not factoring in developments this year that are going to directly impact the link token tokenomics along with the fact link actually saw its sats bottom 6 months before btc's cycle bottom last cycle, if you still believe btc has one more good leg down in it, which itself is questionable considering a lot of indicators suggest the actual top was May 2021.

Suffice to say this is a unique situation. But I still think those that run the market have no interest in the success of link because it is anathema to the clownshow ponzi musical chair games where vc's get guaranteed thousand x multipliers off whatever project they back, and no this isn't conspiracy talk this is just a pessimistic and rational look at how the market currently operates.

>> No.49984916

I’m never selling my link but I do wish someone could hit me with the Men in Black memory eraser so I could forget about crypto for the next year or so. Coming to this board everyday and browsing all the coomer pics, arguments and demoralisation posts is rotting my brain.

>> No.49984927

>>49984916
thats by design

>> No.49984972

>>49984701
> I enjoy kicking linkies like a diseased puppy
Are you by any chance also left leaning, politically?

>> No.49985021

>>49984701
OY VEY

>> No.49985060

>>49984972
He probably has never been laid.

>> No.49985068

>>49983436
>by what metric
All of them? Lol look at the chart you fucking blind retard. Link objectively outperformed them both this bullrun

>> No.49985107

>>49984927
Most like, I wish I could stop myself browsing this shit hole

>> No.49985113

>>49984701
So it’s ok when you shit up the board, but when others do it, it’s a problem?

Something about crying out as they strike against you comes to mind here.

>> No.49985123

>>49985107
*most likely

>> No.49985156
File: 75 KB, 888x1024, 1654921692939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49985156

>>49983174
I sold

>> No.49985316

Somebody post this in their telegram or something?

>>49984848
I would like to make a point out that it doesn't matter how up you are if you never sell. As mentioned, I'm still ripping on fantom. But nothing matters at all until you sell. I was reading this same mindset all the way down from ATH on Link
>yeah well I bought at X and I'm still in profit
If this severe economic downturn continues, then all assets have a LOT lower to go. I do not at all subscribe to the "oh well link can't go that low, it's way too low!" mindset. If the floor falls out of defi, we could plumet back down to a dollar. Nothing wrong with being content about being in profit because you got early, but being in early doesn't matter if you're the last one out.

>>49984972
lolbert, I find myself leaning back and forth between it and some weird flavor of classical liberalism though but both are buzzwords. I just don't want to live around minorities

>>49985021
yikes, dropping the incel argument too

>>49985068
>UHHH I'M STILL UP ATH SO IT'S OKAY
oh shit bitcoin is outperforming link for all time too holy shit link bros how will we recover!

>>49985113
yeah, you get what you give. I'm not making threads, Look at the catalog, more positive link threads than the 2 negatives (and the other isn't that bad).Still shitting it up. Now LPL niggers are back too after long being dead

>> No.49985390

>>49983399
Joke's on them, my og wallet was just a metamask wallet that I pulled everything out of into a ledger awhile back. They'll never find me now.

>> No.49985448
File: 538 KB, 1842x1024, descent_into_oblivion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49985448

Chainlink is doomed.

>> No.49985532

>>49985316
Yes but if you invested in link based on fundamentals and not because you were gambling on crypto, that is definitely a factor, as it gives confidence in your investment. If the verdict is that all of crypto is a ponzi and it will only ever remain as such and never see true adoption, then your thesis is correct, but in that case link was a mediocre play anyways because other gambles paid off far more. What I think gamblers (or just straight crypto skeptics) don't understand is that link is a direct bet against crypto only ever being musical chairs. So temporary poor price action directly tied to said musical chairs dominating the market isn't an indictment on link as an investment, its an indictment on the market and that specific play that it will ever be anything more.

>> No.49985548

>>49985532
also
>we
so you hold link as well. yeah, these threads are so tiresome, its just a bunch of link holders arguing over trivial nonsense instead of just living our lives and comfortable with our investments. I'll admit I waste too much time myself here, though my job is largely work from home so its an easy distraction.

>> No.49985620

as someone actually on biz since it was created in 2014 linkies were definitely smug obnoxious faggots until at least 2019-20 before getting their shit pushed in for the better part of 2 years. It's been very satisfying to watch, as if there is some cosmic force in the universe helping to equalize things

>> No.49985675

>>49985620
I'm going to mow my lawn now but before the same fag in this thread asserts that I'm just larping about being around that long, some of the many 2016-18 shitcoins I remember include:

BITB, ANS/NEO, raiblocks (nano), POSW, WTC, DRGN, AMB, DBC, VET, REQ, SIG, DGB (the ORIGINAL marines), RDD, and many many others that don't immediately come to mind

none were as obnoxious as chainlink, especially over prolonged periods of time.

>> No.49985752

>>49985675
that's only because none of them had fundamentals that were key to mainstream adoption of cryptocurrency and faggots that think its all based on memes are going to literally kill themselves in a few years.

>> No.49985757

>>49985675
>>49985620
>been on this board since 2014
>had the god given chance to buy 15 cent linkies
>still hasn’t made it
Absolute Kek at your worthless life.

>> No.49985820

>>49985316
Do me a favor and denounce the Talmud.

>> No.49985848

>>49985820
idk what the Talmud is but sounds like fag muslim shit so yeah i denounce it. Got some more cope linkie? Maybe another bank run on nexo will do it

>> No.49986049

>>49985848
No you’re alright.

>> No.49986180
File: 5 KB, 219x230, D70A8137936343E9926A823C2D294C4C.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49986180

Linkchuds its over..

>> No.49986227

>>49983174
It’s common knowledge that 90% of LINK OG’s came from /pol/, and are thus unironic Nazis and extremely racist. This is evident when you look at the chats whenever Chainlink presents at conferences such as consensus or smartcon. It’s always N word this, N word that.

I personally don’t want to put my money into a project like that and keep that sort of company. Moreover, I question the intelligence of people who shill LINK given their backwards and racist political views.

>> No.49987666

>>49986227
good redditlarp 6/10

>> No.49988187

>>49983436
>1 billion posts by this id
Thats a yikes from me sweatie. If Link threads trigger you so much why not filter them? Why are you spending hours of your time a day posting on Link threads?
>btw you own Link

>> No.49988316

>>49988187
He gets paid to fud it. His villages food rations are dependent on how much link goes down.

>> No.49988328

>>49984532
kek u got annihilated

>> No.49988501

>>49983975
Dude, why are you still arguing with them? I've become lazy. Not that it isn't entertaining watching you destroy their tranny asses lol.
If it's fun for you too, by all means keep going on bro.
Btw, what can one do about those AMB shit? It isn't really detrimental in any way, right?

>> No.49988544

>>49988501
Dust attack. Just leave it. Don't do anything with it.

>> No.49988746

>>49983546
>Because fantom hasn't spammed their shitcoin since 2017 claiming this is a fantom board
Link fudders, I...
>28 posts by this id
>Seething through his teeth

>> No.49988779
File: 275 KB, 1080x1524, 1594564419463.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49988779

>>49983284
absolutely based

>> No.49988785
File: 87 KB, 1080x380, Screenshot_20220627-085139~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49988785

>>49988746
Ooops forgot pic.

>> No.49989216

Imagine if the people who posted relentless Link fud were to have a similar misfortune to Nexo et al?
Wouldn't that be a shame.

>> No.49989247

>>49983174
I’m buying KENSHI the better version of LINK at a sub one million cap you retards

>> No.49989284

>>49985752
how's that been going for you the last two years?

>>49985757
cope

>> No.49989333

>>49984532
Yeah you pretty much comfirmed it.

>> No.49989448
File: 65 KB, 887x1294, OCpostersimeonthenigger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49989448

>>49983174
>hold
Chainlink pumped from 17 cents to 54 dollars. if you didnt take some profits along the way its your own fault.
>team dumping on your head every month
the tokens arent "dumped", they are used to fund the Development of the Chainlink Oracle network.
>can’t even participate in the defi that it propels
you actually can participate in DeFi, no problem. have you tried doing your own research? doesnt look like you did.
>put link in aave, get liquidated
if you are too retarded to manage your loan then this is whats going to happen.
>put link in bancor, celsius
thats CeFi and as Sergey has said many times, Truth > Trust, if you still gave them your money despite knowing this then you are a brainlet who failed the test.

>> No.49989452

>>49983284
Liar.
Your gay fud made me sell me 100 million link tokens. Good job