/biz/ - Business & Finance

no way this generic piece of crap made it into a serious art exhibit

>>49842086
forgot link https://twitter.com/zemotion/status/1531884510064746496

https://today.rtl.lu/news/luxembourg/a/1922813.html

Well which one is the original? And are they both digital/photos?

>>49842086
Is this what fucking china does all the time to everyone elses products anyway. She can get a taste of her countries shit.

>>49842145
Does it matter? Doesn't a person have a right to their image and likeness?

>>49842159
this

>>49842174
no

>>49842086
Let me guess, the guy in question is jewish, correct?

This is what ip laws are meant to do. They are used by the powerful to legally rob the small guys. Good luck paying the legal fees to compete with them goyim.

>>49842086
Posts copy of image the internet for anyone to use.
LUX is a total free for all wild west, no surprises here.

Just part of the free market goy ;^) if u dont like it u can talk to my lawyer who also happens to be my uncle ;^)

should've nft her image

>>49842086
>when youre so bad at art you have to knock off a chink
kek

>>49842086
>muh laws
god i hate americans, they make the internet so much worse

>>49842086
They should've teamed up, the guy is obvious a superior editor and together they could've made more prize winning works.

>>49842112
>Serious art exhibit
No such thing

>>49842086
>manplain
what?

>>49842159
She's an American artist retard

>>49842499
serious as in "well respected". ofc they exist

>>49842229
Everytime

>>49842112
photography is the lowest form of art. Worse than talentless women shitting period blood in the street as performance art.

I dunno, sounds based to me.

>>49842565
a man (lawyer) had to explain his legal opinion, in defense of his client, to her.
manplain just means a man explaining...

>>49842566
>jingna zhang
>american artist
off yourself you despicable scum

>>49842086
I follow her on Twatter kek. Her photos look cool and would smash.

>>49842086
>he copied my art
what was the art?
>a magazine photoshoot she did.
TOPKEK

>>49842086
>where can I find a Luxembourgish speaker
my sides are in orbit

>>49842086
i would mansplain her if you know what i mean

>>49842625
>even removed the degenrate tattoo and cigarette
absolutely based

>>49842616
meh
i like andreas gursky

>>49842699
left is the copycat's work

>>49842086
Now her RAWs not her photo

>>49842699
no the jewish-luxembourgian artist added the cig & tat, really makes you think

>>49842086
In my own life I have made one meme which itself was just a recycle of earlier components which has seen use. That is one silly image that has had an effect larger than zero and even that is minuscule.
This roastie should be happy her art had an impact on the world. I mean it is about the art, right, and not about your own personal bullshit

You don't even need to copy art. Just make a Redbubble account and sell shirts and other normie-magnet trinkets that are branded. All you have to do is find brands that won't take your artwork down (most of them won't, just don't try Rolex) and make some simple edits on Photoshop. You can make a nice little side income from this for practically no effort. Redbubble seems to be quite lenient and won't ban you right off the bat, even if your artwork gets flagged and taken down a few times.

>>49842699
lol

>>49842625
>Removes the tattoo and cigarette
Kek, he probably lurks here

>>49842788
Fr? Lol

little trick on nuance here, /biz/, so listen up.
She can both be correct that her copyright was infringed and also be a worthless cunt who uses buzzwords like 'mansplain'.
He can both be a nasty fucking kike for his theft and also an ungovernable chad by shitting on stupid copyright spooks.
however, OP is always a faggot and posting twitter screencaps is never not a faggot move and there is no nuance there.

>>49842145
The one on the right has more value range. That's likely the original. I'm siding with the roastie tbqh.

>>49842699
Sped

>>49842086
Chinese kinda deserve it though.

>>49843056
She's one of those Americans that think they're in touch with their Asian roots. But they're really just have white women privilege and sensibilities.

best part is that there's no fucking way she even owns the rights to the original photo

>>49842086
this is a conundrum because on the one hand ip law is gay, but on the other hand so are art exhibits. ultimately I hope she successfully sues him and also I hope I can find a hi-res version of his photo (which is better than her original)

>>49842699
retard spotted

>>49843097
oh lmao nevermind then the guy likely bought rights from the mag fuck this bitch

>>49842710
>pic
Is that in the US? everyone is so thin and white

>>49843097
Unless nike stole her image, she is wasting energy with this. I'm still on her side though. Thieves should have their hands cut off.

>>49842939
/thread unless anyone has the nudes

Walt Disney should not get a penny for my Mickey Mouse hentai. Fuck all IP law. Make money on your dumb drawing or I will.

>>49842086
>>49842229
Jewy looking. Luxembourg is very Jew friendly.

>>49842086
Good. We don't need art. We have furry porn and globohomo diagrams of interracial gay couples and that's about what you deserve.

that's one toasty roastie

>>49842086
/ic/ here, this isn’t copying, it’s using a reference image and every semi decent piece of art ever has done this

>>49843168
he didn't, he sent some dumb ass email exhibiting a reddit-tier understanding of this using the "all artists borrow" type justification

>>49842634
Mansplaining is a man explaining something obvious to a woman like she knows nothing.

>>49842086
>muh intellectual property

Try not sucking and you won't have to worry about it

>>49842086
Judging by this one >>49842625
He is taking photos and photo realistically copying them with oil on canvas. So while still stealing (or "heavily borrowing from" or "heavily inspired by" as the kikes like to call it) it isn't like he is importing the pics into photoshop and changing the saturation and then claiming it as his own work.

The paintings are his own work, but he stole the likeness and scene of the original photo.

What the fuck does this have to do with fitness?

>>49843331
then you’re a dogshit faggot of an artist, ive been a painter for years and reference is one thing but if you’re just recycling someone elses subject, composition, style, etc, its objectively not your work

Fuck does she want? She just posed for a photo. He actually put time and effort into making a beautiful piece of art.

>>49843459
>so while still stealing
stealing only applies when one deprives another of property.

>>49842086
>chink
>copyright
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

>>49843564
lol brainlet. he made a painted replica of a photograph. you can buy painted replicas online of famous pieces of art for a few hundred bucks, they pay art students near minimum wage to crank them out. there is no creative talent involved in his work. you probably think photorealistic sketches people post on reddit are the highest tier of artistic achievement.

>>49843615
CHING CHONG DING DONG
taste of your own medicine

>>49842086
>chinkess
>uses the term “mansplaining”
Aaaaand my sympathy is gone. It’s like if cancer got cancer itself, lmao.

>>49842086
>NO YOU CANT USE MY PHOTO AS A REFRENCE!!!

>>49842086
>mansplain
What the fuck is even that word? I never understood it. Is it just a woman's way of coping because she's too pants on head fucking retarded to understand what's being said and instead of admitting fault she just resorts to being dismissive by saying "lol ur a man". There's literally only "explaining" and I'm sorry your a fucking retard and think the world revolves around you.

>>49843177
Yes. It's probably from the 80s or early 90s before everyone got fat.

>>49843727
you're literally mansplaining "mansplaning" right now, fucking moid.

>>49843544
Try doing a realistic portrait without a model for reference and see how well it goes

>>49843832
Kill yourself cunt.

>>49843892

>>49843727
It's when a nerd assumes you don't know their hobby and explains it back to you like a prick. Should probably broaden the term because it happens to everyone.

>>49843727
It's a combination from the words "man" and "explaining". It's a woman's way to express that men often try to explain something to them, as if they wouldn't know, probably because the man expects them to not know because they are women. They invented the word, because they are of the opinion that men don't do this to other men, because men see other men as more competent than women.

>>49842174
not women

>chink moans about copyright infringement
poetic

>>49843399
Ah, yes
The "every man in existence is a telepath and therefore has access to a catalog of all the knowledge of every being he interacts with, so of course he deliberately chooses to explain the stuff his psionic powers tell him the other beings have so he can be annoying to them" term
If only something like the literal impossibility of everyone being interested in the same fields and therefore the need to explain stuff about them to the non-proffessonals of said areas was considered before the "how come literally everyone I interact with donesn't know about what i'm interested in? Are they trying to offend the all-important me?" train of thought people would be happier

>>49842086
B-BASED???????

>>49843892
reading comprehension dumbass, doing a study/gridshit like that is good practice but you have to add SOMETHING original to it that isnt just a lazy fucking hue shift to be able to call it your own work or you’re just a brainless paint monkey

>>49843892
You can have a model reference and not copy an entire photograph and its composition

>>49842086
>mansplain
She lost all my support there. She has a solid case, theres no need to use that bullshit.

lmao unfathomably based

>>49842625
>>49843459
Hes a completely unoriginal artist. Now that people are aware of it, his art will never sell.

>>49842699
Stop. You're retarded.

>>49843459
It becomes a problem soon as he starts earning money with it. Had he been doing this as a hobby then he could get away with it, if he earns money for it then he needs a license of a sort and he doesn't. Same happens with for example 3d models of specific branded items, soon as you use it for commercial use you have to pay the original makers revenue, you can't even purchase some 3D models like cars from Ford for example because you go through an application screening that checks your company's revenue and how much you can pay for using their stuff. This is why if you do use something that has a commercial license you adjust it enough that people cannot recognize it, but in this case the adjustments are very minimal so he can get in trouble for it specially after having a big mouth.

I see the problem here bros but I feel extremely sexist right now bros...do you know what I mean? I feel like saying women are below men so this is a non issue...in fact she should pay him for using her dumb ass photo

>>49843721

but the photo is their intellectual property, of course you need to ask for permission to use it?

obviously there's a big difference between some 12 year old tik tok enjoyer tracing an image they like as practice and some israeli trying to pass it off as their own work for the commercial gibs

>>49842797
If some faggot took your paintings, added a cig and airpods, then sold it for $6000 you'd be pissed too you actual cuck lol

>>49842574
"Well respected" exhibits shiw literal canvas with a bloody tampon stuck to it. Art is a meme.

some white knight simp will pro bono represent her and the other guy will have to pay up far more than he earned from this which will teach him a lesson

also galleries in europe are very snobby and this guy is going to get blacklisted for doing shit like this and essentially he's done

>>49843185
Copyright is horseshit. You don’t have right to own ideas

>>49842625
(((diechsburg)))

absolutely juiced

The world of artists is not THAT big, once word comes out that your work is based on BETTER work from other photographers then your shit will simply not sell and you fade away into obscurity. You're only as good as your last job is what I've been told and those people are right: if you do good work then people will act like it is nothing, make one mistake and they won't call you back ever again cause you fucked up.

>>49842699
what a fucking retard

Great artists steal.

>>49842229
He's worse than a Jew, he's a Benelux fag

>>49844707
No I wouldn't. Imaginary property is a scam

>>49842939
>a worthless cunt who uses buzzwords
Find me an Asian American woman who is not the one

>>49842145
>>49842949
The one on the right is the original, it's actually a photograph. In the twitter thread the roastie says it's from a magazine cover shoot.

>>49844855
No, this is blatant theft, lol.
Good artists lift things from eachother and put their own spin on it. This is the difference between remaking "Nirvana Smells like teen spirit by Slipknot" and Literally taking a slipknot song and claiming it's your own.

>>49845166
How is a complete change of medium not "their own spin"?

The original is literally just a photo.

The other is an oil painting, with modifications to color, hair, make-up, jewelry.

Literally the only thing the painter should have done is add a note that says "painted with ___ as a reference" somewhere. The chick deserves nothing.

>>49842616
Despite the sentiment of that post, I kind of agree. Even painting a picture is creating something new. Making a picture, and I'm assuming you didn't arrange what's in the picture like >>49842710, is just capturing what's already there. The art could be to capture it right and to have some good settings for that specific situation, but that's not art, is it?

A groupie configuring all the audio equipment is not art, is it?

>Oh my god, the pure exquisitry of how the groupie turned the knob to about half-way totally signifies [some snobby academic mumbo jumbo].

>>49843459
>Hurr durr, I copied the files of a game, changed some colors here and there, changed some values of the monsters.
>It's my game now.

That doesn't sound right, does it?

Or:
>Hurr durr, I literally downloaded a song from the internet, changed some of the sounds in a sound editing software.
>totally my own song

>>49842112
the left is a beautiful photo, the editing on the right makes it look stupid

>>49842606
Lol sex id

>>49842086
The corporate commies have been doing this for years.
Intentionally stealing and promoting shit “art” and surpressing real talent, all for money and brainwashing

>>49842625
Burg

the guy is obviously a shit heel who did the wrong thing, and the only reason you would side against the woman is because you are a female-hating incel
simple as

>>49842699
this is your brain on confirmation bias due to echo chambers

>>49843262
Portrait of a subhuman (2022)

>>49842086
I don't care.
Roastie btfo.
I side with the man because the chance of the roastie lying about it is extremely high.

>>49842699
Posts like this are why anyone who rolls a red ID should be instantly permab& from /biz/. It's the universe signalling to you and everyone around you how retarded you are. Make /biz/ great again, ban the red scourge.

>>49843262
his name is Dieschburg, jews often took names referring to cities. Guarantee it's a jew who jewed her out of the copyright.

>>49849826
> the only reason you would side against the woman is because you are a female-hating incel
simple as

>>49845972
Modifying copyrighted material is theft.

In this case, the Benelux retard didn't modify enough the original work and got caught.
Even worse he confronted the original owner.

Yes, he will lose easily if he goes to trial.
But most likely nothing will happen.

Using a picture as reference for a painting is not copyright infringement

Moreover, the rights should belong to the magazine or the photographer,not the model

>>49843185
>i'm still on her side
Go kill yourself you nasty troon

>>49842699
Got it backward. He added the cigarette and tattoo, as expected of the...

>>49842145
>>49842949
>>49846465
is this a fucking bot thread or am I sharing this board with such low IQ individuals who cant even recognize an obvious photo...jesus if you people are actually real then this is fucking surreal

>>49849826
The average /biz/ anon is retarded, what else is new.