/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49640604
>lower than ICO price
JUST

>>49640604
It broke 10c yesterday though.

I am seriously tempted to sell my bags at a 90% loss because of this faggot I swear to god

>>49640604
got 40k, working my way up to 100k

thinking i need 200k to be comfy

>>49640719
He's just trying to pump his bag so he can exit before the unlock in 4 days time.

>>49640680
For how long though. Once those cheap girthies starting getting sucked up it popped right back up

>>49640812
We'll see, the 12% supply increase in a few days with price at ATL should be entertaining.

>>49640875
You do realize markets price these things in. You will be pleasantly surprised as this will be the LAST large unlock that this coin will EVER have again

>>49640914
>priced in
I doubt that.

>>49640604
the FEES are FAKE

>>49640914
>priced in
Ah yes, same as back at $1.
Please shut the fuck up forever.

>>49640604
It's over.

>>49640914
>Priced in
Famous last words.

>>49641164
I made a position about 2 weeks ago with a .15 cent average. My positions are usually very very close to the bottom. Follow me and I’ll lead you

>>49640719
the thought that this low iq faggot is in with us, makes me wanna puke

>>49641221
What makes you smarter then me?

>>49641765
If I see this tranny faggot in one more post, I'm selling at 60% loss.

>>49641914
He abandoned his thread this morning after some pertinent questions he seemed unable to answer.

>>49642224
meds

>>49642224
He always does that. Disappears or just outright ignores you if you as much ask anything about where the fuck he's pulling out his bullshit from.
He's honestly the strongest fud I've ever faced, I seriously reconsidered my investment once this faggot got involved.

>>49642360
Don't let the presence of a misguided moonboy fud you out of your bags. We deal with them from time to time, but they're far from representative of the project. GRT has a way of sobering overenthusiastic speculators.

>>49642224
>>49642360
I don’t abandon anything. I’m usually spending my 30 million in gains throughout the day.

Ask me any questions you might have. I’ll answer them easily

>>49643857
Current queries following projected?
Source for your speed claim?

>>49644018
The speed quote was fed to him by a parsnip troll, and he's been echoing it since because he doesn't verify claims or really understand what he's shilling to begin with.

>>49644292
I would laugh but that's actually quite sad.

>>49644018
Current queries are around 1.4 billion a day.

Speed of the daily queries can be found on their LinkedIn account. The idiot spewing prq troll nonsense is exactly that an idiot who doesn’t do his own research

>>49641765
*than

>>49644499
So, less than half the projected query volume you were trying to insinuate in your last thread?

>>49644499
Do you have any concerns around GRT?

>>49644499
>The idiot spewing prq troll nonsense is exactly that an idiot who doesn’t do his own research
It was you though?

>>49644499
You never answered this one either?

I can't fucking stand the generals these days. If we hit one American Dollar at some point again I'm using my newfound wealth to find and eliminate Omega so we can go back to Carlos-posting in peace
>>49640604
>June 5
At this point I think you're posting outdated graphs on purpose, you insufferable twat
>>49644873
fbpb

>>49645179
If my PRQ gets back over $1 I will join forces? I too detest the fecker.

>>49644499
picrel.

What you and the parsnip both fail to understand is that the point to The Graph is not realtime bulk retrieval of txn data, but the performant custom aggregation of event data attached to those txns for realtime querying.

In short, the parsnip is shilling an oil field, while The Graph is a vertically integrated petrochemicals conglomerate.

Now that OmegaFaggot has shown beyond a reasonable doubt that he as a buck can be broken (otherwise he will suck 300 million cocks).

>>49641765
stop trying to pretend you're the assblaster of grt. It's cringe af. Besides, your posts are full of inaccuracies whenever you pretend to be technical.

Regardless, is it a good time to invest in GRT?

I would like to pick up a big that might go somewhere later on, but I don't know if it bottomed out yet.

Even a modest 2x/3x is good enough for me.
I'm considering either this or ALGO

>>49645495
I actually do understand that. I just came across Omega and had to query his nonsense. DESU, I am mostly looking at how Parsiqs Tsunami will compare to GRT.

>>49645832
It's at its ATL, so
Could also dump to 1c idk

>>49645832
summer is coming. If last year is any indication, the team will go into holiday mode from mid July to September. I wouldn't expect anything until then.
From September onwards, there should be news about L2, substreams, integrations with more chains on decentralised mainnet, and first stage of sunsetting the hosted service will be initiated at the end of Q3.
But autumn is also the time when the macro shit is about to go down. It wouldn't be surprising if we're still in the $0.1-$0.2 range or below that by EOY.

>>49645847
Apples and oranges.

As far as the realm of blockchain data goes, PRQ's value prop in historical data competes with that of CQT, while CQT is attempting to transition into more direct competition with GRT. GRT's use case, meanwhile, has market competition from ALEPH in the Solana ecosystem and SQT in the Polkadot ecosystem, but leads the way in overall adoption, ecosystem participation, R&D momentum.

>>49646138
ETH was supposed to merge in 2018. what makes you think a project that has been over budget and behind schedule will launch this next year? the hosted service was supposed to sunset last year lmao even

>>49646330
Yep, the tsunami overlap with GRT is what I'm looking at. Truth is Parsiq has a lot of other things going on and the historical data isn't the biggest of it. Obviously, as a PRQ maxi I hope we steal some of the GRT customer base but I'm really just looking for an understanding of how all this just plays out really.
It is incredibly difficult to find speed of GRT services though.

>>49646383
I gave >>49645832 this year's roadmap with the implication that even if executed on time, it might not help the price. Ofc it can be worse.

does anyone know why Nader quit?

literally went to 9 cents yesterday retard

Buying an alt coin is like paying for a lifelong research grant to these jackasses to tinker with blockchain bullshit.

>>49643857
Why won't you show hand withnl time stamp?.... I ask every time I see you.

>>49646138
The team's holiday mode followed the delivery of curation, and even then they were closely monitoring the situation and tweaking mainnet infra afterward. There are a tremendous amount of deliverables that need to be rolled out before the ETH merge and hosted service sunsetting. All hands on deck likely until Q2 2023.

>>49646383
Despite the optimism last summer, the way things have played out has been a lot more realistic and pragmatic. Sunsetting the hosted service last year would have been ecosystemic suicide.

>>49646463
If you want to determine the speed of The Graph, deploy subgraphs of varying complexity to mainnet and observe how long it takes for them to sync. Fire off a ton of queries at them and gather statistics on the requests/responses. It still won't be an accurate long-term performance indicator though, since StreamingFast tech will be replacing things in the future.

Given The Graph and Parsiq serving different kinds of data needs, I don't really see them poaching each other except where there's a better match in use cases rather than performance concerns.

>>49646886
we'll see. I've got used to seeing members of the teams posting vacation photos when they were supposed to work hard.

>>49646536
$$$$$

>>49646536
Probably satisfied with his DevRel contributions for The Graph.

It'll be interesting to see where he goes next.

Can someone explain the hosted service and why it exists in the first place? Why is it taking so long to migrate from it? Technological reasons or political?

>>49647726
Hosted service is being used to make the entire crypto rely on the service. Once we have them all relying on us we pull the plug and make them pay. It’s genius really

>>49647726
Imagine offering a service for free that a multitrillion dollar industry absolutely depends on and can't easily or inexpensively replicate and then turning around and charging for it this year, and then distributing the revenue to stakeholders. Just imagine how much money will be siphoned from these clients to the network. Extorted out of tens, hundreds of millions of dollars per year soon.

But because the industry has no other option, they'll pay to keep using it, and because the industry is quickly growing, more people will pay to use it. What choice do they have?

>>49647919
I remember when photobucket tried that.

>>49645495
You mean PRQ provides raw data and GRT processes it?

>>49648100
I'm still waiting to get more info on the new Parsiq suite but between Tsunami, Data lakes, Data hubs and the SDK it seems Parsiq is becoming a one stop data shop. They can interrogate, deliver, process and action from data. Historical or live streamed. Obviously it is still being tested but testing seems to be going well.
I'm still learning about capability of both projects.

>>49648364
Bro can you fuck OFF! You’ve been Shilling that hacked fork of a shitcoin every thread.

>>49648669
You're shilling yours with dodgy info. I'm still waiting for your answers. Evven GRT holders don't like you.

>>49647726
Before it existed, the only thing The Graph offered was graph-node and the subgraph standard it indexed. The hosted service was the next step in the evolution of the project, a centralized solution built around graph-node, offered for free in order to reach market first and establish compounding network effects until mainnet was ready.

The 3.5 years since have been spent iteratively building, testing, and polishing the decentralized network to ensure a smooth transition to it.

>>49647975
Photobucket absolutely gutted its user experience without bringing anything new or improved to the table for the paid service. It was a convenience with mediocre service, a low moat, many competitors, and utter failure to capture its network effects, like Imageshack before it. I'm surprised that Imgur is still going strong, but its UX has been declining in recent years as well.

>>49648100
Pretty much, as far as historical data goes. Parsiq is a centralized entity though, while The Graph is working towards decentralizing its service and operations.

>>49640604
anons please stop buying into shitcoins left and right. Maybe for once in your lives invest in something useful like MATIC.

>>49648775
>Pretty much, as far as historical data goes. Parsiq is a centralized entity though, while The Graph is working towards decentralizing its service and operations.
Aye, Parsiq are moving to a new 'hybrid' model of partial decentralisation but will retain an element of centralisation. There will be a DAO etc. It's an interesting concept and still watching to see where it goes.
I get what you are saying about the differences in photobucket and GRT approach. I was just having a dig at omega who seems to suggest holding an industry to ransom in a similar way photobucket did with users forum photos is a viable business strategy.

>>49648964
Bro nobody cares about that hacked shitcoin that forks at any given notice you idiot

>>49650160
Like I told you last night. Parsiq was never hacked. In fact, as data and security specialists they have been involved in major hack mitigations.
You really are a spacker.

>>49640604
We've done it, we've reached the polar opposite of GRTSux
A GRT fan that posts lackluster shilling in full sincerity, easily torn down by competing shills and even GRT owners themselves, drives away both new and old investors alike, most likely a signal of another price drop
If I weren't already so deep in the red I'd sell my bags because of you

What's a sui stack though?

>>49650734
10k grt

>>49640748
I was u.. and then on Sat morning I decided to get to 100k (bought all remaining stack for .15 per GRT).. we all know what happened right after.. do not be me.. 10c is not the bottom. We are all fcked

Tip of the morning Sirs

>>49644499
what the fuck are you smoking? And can you please share?

https://thegraph.com/explorer/network/epochs

Look guys this shit literally can’t drop below 10 cents it’s in the damn protocol.

>>49654748
please stop

when's the supply unlock?

>>49654862
18th. 12% of supply. 6bn tokens iirc? Another one in Dec I think.

>>49654862
Last major token unlock. Will put us at 8.5B tokens out of 10.3b. Practically max cap.

>>49655116
well why the fuck would anyone touch this before over a billion tokens are unlocked

>>49655159
Because they aren’t given to random idiots that will dump. Unlocks are used to grow the protocol through indexers who lock their tokens. I’ll be surprised if even 1% of those get dumped.

>>49655159
You do also realize 40% of the entire circulating supply is locked for atleast 28 days. Once the free service gets destroyed the supply shock will make this moon so fucking bad.

>>49655194
So who's been dumping all year then lad?

>>49655280
Dumb question. Take a picture of your 100K+ car with time stamp or fuck off poor fag

>>49655313
Post willy.

>>49645765
>stop trying to pretend you're the assblaster of grt. It's cringe af. Besides, your posts are full of inaccuracies whenever you pretend to be technical.

>>49648669
>>49648774
Holy shit it's these two dumb asses again.
Shorting both of your shitcoins

>>49655645
You won't do shit.

Bumping for GRT

>>49655258
Well liquid staking is coming so I don’t think we’ll see a supply shock

>>49657297
I'd argue the opposite, as it allows delegators to access capital that would otherwise be staked, offering an incentive to remain staked. What's your rationale?

Actually this coin was made to go down. Imagine being app owner and needing to pay for queries. Just buy big stack and deegate and cover your payments with the fees. But the protocol would not make any money. So they are dumping the price artificially to keep apps paying the fees with more and more GRT. Cost for app devs stays flat (pegged to dolla).

Slurped 152,000 GRT at .097
Not selling until $5 minimum.

>>49654748
Oh look it dropped below 10c and you're a nigger as usual

lol
the answer is no btw

We will suffer through 2023 and be rewarded on the other side

>>49660448
I will continue to DCA anyway, fundamentals have not changed

I will be buying below 5c as much as I can
Not touching it at higher price though

>>49660251
>BUT MUH PROTOCOL
never have I been so happy to lose money, thank you omegafaggot

i am europoor and i just dca in this nightmare. is there really chances for this to drop to 0,5-0,7 range? i really need couple thousand more but i already burned all i have in this pile of shit. i am too deep in this already to back off. i would want to buy something else with my meager income but this fucker just ruined me. i am at the point i would almost suck a cock at 10k gurts anons. i am ass fucked by this

>>49647961
>and because the industry is quickly growing
not anymore

GRT at under 10 cents is magnificent.

>>49662795
2-3c is the absolute bottom, it will go there eventually

>>49664810
i hope you are right anon, thanks for hopium. i have 100$ and it's all i have left and i will buy this with it

>>49664839
just be patient and don't fomo into bounces. BTC is going to 10k at least maybe even lower

>>49640719
What's the essence? Just stake it and forget about it for the next 5 five years. I'm 30% down already on RFOX but I'm not moved as I staked it for 40% APY.

>>49664996
thanks anon. i will keep cool and just wait for the 2-3c. if it doesn't happen it doesn't. i have 8k delegating and need to accept that's it

>>49658880
You spent over 10K on this very bullish
Just make sure that falling knife don’t cut ya hands too badly