/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49460724
>you should be licking his feet
Already am faggot

>>49460724
What’s the point in having a small group of giants partaking in the alert. Better off letting the dedicated neets do that job and a lot of them will provide security

>>49460724
you sound very upset. sounds like you're the one crying.

>>49460724
Don't care, not selling. Everybody who is profiting from chainlink technology will be living his feet and we will unironically reach new highs when all is said and done. Dare I say, 1000 eoy?

>>49460792
Yeah sure because neets are a beacon of reliability and responsiveness thanks for your input

>>49460724
They will want to decentralize da steaks. Probably ico buyers are early enough. I'd also think steaks are capped to avoid centralization. 25mil is not a lot tho so we'll see. 70mil might be enough to get some 2018 bros in too

>>49460724
>go cry in a corner
says the absolute faggot sperging out over other people's joy
Get ahold of yourself. You're acting like a scorned woman

>horsepool
i'll just use one of their competitors with better returns when they inevitably show up :)

Three womyn (he/she) from the discord have already kys over the staking news. They thought they controlled the entire market, and committed suicide the moment they realized that they were completely irrelevant. Do you think that’s funny or something?

>>49461027
As if Stan will be autistic enough to watch the price feeds for incorrect information like the neets here

>>49460724
>Only current node operators like linkpool and community supporters like Aave, uni etc will have access to the staking rewards

HOLY FUCKING SHIT WE'RE MAKING IT

>>49461186
Yes keep waiting bro, 2 more weeks ;)

>>49460724
Listen retard. Everyone that stakes is v0.1 is literally staking in one(1) DON. The ETH/USD price feed. I’ll let you figure out what will happen as more DONs begin accepting stake.

>>49460724
>Linkpool tards screeching as they're token becomes increasingly useless

You love to see it.

>>49461683
Token not needed meme was meant for lpl all along

Didnt one of the founders quit and market dump all his tokens or you guys dont talk about that anymore? Fuckin poolers man

>>49460724
V.01 is a boring ETH-feed. Staking gets interesting when node revenues start getting shared with stakers. Why? Because revenue spikes with market- (or later informational-) volatility, as in pic related. With a revenue share, stakers will continually be earning, but they will also have the opportunity to 'win big' by gambling on feeds in which they expect there to be a surge in activity. Which will be fun.

Token not needed. Dont need ur middle man scam.

>yeah Uhh you need to buy double of our random useless scam coin of the amount of the actual project, link you want to stake!

So if you have 10k link worth 90k, in order to get 5% apy on that, you need to purchase 90k worth of our shitcoin so you can make 200$ a month on your link staking.

HAHAHHAHAHHA what a ridiculous business model, you really think sergey will allow this?
What sane person wouldn't just use that extra 90k to buy more link, the actual main token which makes all of this possible.

Lpl shills are total idiots, just trying to shill their garbage literal who shitcoin which has 20k daily volume because nobody cares about this irrelevent grift

>>49462393
You hold linkpool

>>49462431
I only hold link, Lpl unneeded, there will be hundreds of node providers in competition with them competing for peoples link since the nodes need link for priority

>>49462491
Still not staking on v0.1 nopooler

>>49460724
Staking probably means you gotta lock in your LINK stack for some time period. Yeah absolutely fuck that. As long as the whole supply hasn't hit circulation, I'm gonna keep swinging.

>>49460724
I'm not sure why you are so upset. I understand that you missed out, no need to take it out on those of us who didn't

>>49462906
Nobody cares. The price will pump. Every $1 increase is $80,000 in the bank for me.

You LP faggots are the dumbest people on biz.

>>49460724
based its gonna be good to be staking from day 1.
>Stakers participating in the v0.1 release will have their staked LINK locked until at least the release of v1, where they will then be able to choose commitment periods of varying lengths.
im excited for sergey to tell me about his varying lengths

>>49460724
>max 5% gain while risking my entire stack in some beta testing phase with absolutely 0 loss protection
>not ONLY that, but I need to almost match my LINK stack to have enough LPL to stake in their system
for 5 fucking percent APY? kill yourself, LPL unironically not needed, my stack is sitting in my cold wallet until I can easily host my own node from my server at home

>>49463536
Forgive me if I'm retarded but isn't the point of v0.1 that there is no slashing and no risk of losing your stack? Or is getting slashed not the only way your stack is at risk?

>>49460724
>YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STAKE WITHOUT LP
>YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STAKE IN V.01
what's next?

>>49464202
No you're right, he's just another seething fuddie

>>49464202
Id imagine if there is no slashing there is no consequence thus no loss of LINK. Good question and i dont know if anyone knows for sure.

I can get 8.5% APY rn in Bancor V3. Can anyone explain to me why this is a bad idea, besides smart contract exploit risk?

>>49460724
why would they describe aave and uni as "long-term token holders"?
is this some new form of fud?
because yeah when people start to see early holders get that 5% there will be a lot more eyes on chainlink
time is running out for you guys

>>49464202
new form of fud, when you point out that there's no slashing in v0.1 then they say well oh there's smart contract risk
i guess there is but can't imagine the team fucking up a deposit and withdraw contract

>>49460724
You sound uncertain, are you ok?

>>49460724
LPL'ers are the biggest and most insufferable faggots. A bunch of autistic midwits trying to 1-up LINK holders through their retarded middle-man token. Those mongoloids really believed they would become the first ones to stake lmao.

>>49460724
Ask me how I know you didn’t read the blog post

>>49466489
>believed
they still do
and they still will after everyone is staking, in a delusional delirium
i can already picture the "how does it feel not being able to stake" threads, with everyone pointing out and posting pictures of staking without LPL, only to be dismissed as liars or copers

they have to cope or rope

>>49460724
>I want to make something very clear to all of you no poolers

Its fine I'll wait. I want nothing to do with Jonny and those horses

>>49461186
>>horsepool

Fucking kek

>>49466529
Imagine having bought a shitton of LPL at a huge premium in the hopes of being among the first ones to stake. Only to now realize it was all for nothing.

>>49460838
This, its chainlink summer op

imagine coping so hard you have to create a chain of replies on why another man's investments are so bad.

Rory is speaking wagmi!!!!!!!!

>>49466814
Who are you talking to buddy?

>>49460724
How much do you need to solo stake?

>>49461128
>nopooler triggered

>>49466489
Do you really have no clue what LPL really is?
If you could buy 10% of the global future network of nodes of the Chainlink network which will be worth trillions what price would you be willing to pay?

>>49460724
I didn’t buy link to stake it, I bought it to sell it.

>>49468935
To sell it?
Didn't we all buy it because we liked the logo of the token?

>>49468861
I rather buy more chainlink lmao

>>49468861
They own 100M link?

>>49463521
How does it feel being 3.4m down from your ath?

>>49466033
stacked protocol risk and the fact that IL payouts are in BNT

>>49470880
Will a company can get a backend team to handle the intricacies of deploying a node, or just get an accountant and an IT guy to use naas.link to deploy a pre-built node with human readable inputs and outputs for a fee to LPL holders? Will you guys learn the intricacies of running a node or just wind up using naas.link or some knock-off some day and still pay us LPL holders or someone else a fee?
Lmao

pool's closed, no poolers rekt

>>49466592
Still not staking on v0.1 nopoolie

>>49460792
Price feed data consumers (Aave, Synthetix, Compound) are the biggest stakers, they are going to pursue the implicit incentives to the limit, simple as

>>49460792
>Better off letting the dedicated neets do that job
That's pretty much what they're going to do, there's a specific "community alerter allotment", and then they explicitly say "Node operators that actively service Chainlink Data Feeds will be provided their own distinct allotments to fill".

>>49476247
Lol