/biz/ - Business & Finance

> + 0.1%

>typo
It's over isn't it

>>49324022
CHECKED

>>49324022
Sandro Salsano, where is my money?

>>49324166
salami sanchez

>>49324166
Eric Schmidt, where is my money?

>>49324022
The Top 3 Possible Chainlink-Staking Outcomes:

1.
>staking finally arrives
>unstaking requires Level 70 VAXXPASS™

2.
>mandatory staking
>lock-in period: 3 years
>may never unstake

3.
>no staking ever comes
>the Great Reset is dead on arrival and Chainlink goes to zero

>>49324199
Dude, you're a MANIAC!

>>49324199
>The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

>>49324199
You vill eat ze logs schwab anon
The great clogging is upon us

Staking an unneeded token is not needed.

WAGMI

>>49324022
is this the new set of slides he's going to be showing off for the next three years?

>>49324570
You just have to wait for a week.

>>49324022
It's literally just the same slides as always.

>>49324022
Cope, cope, cope.

>>49324632
>>49324605
>>49324570
Discord jannies at full force here.

>>49324662
I don't even have discord but whatever makes you feel better buddy.

>>49324022
It's actually going to be announced at consensus isn't it...

>>49324083
Adelyn has been making spelling errors ever since she was hired

>>49324721
I am excited like a kid waiting for christmas. We waited for YEARS for staking. It is unironically happening next week.
>>49324736
Tiger mommy is the queen the world doesn't deserve.

>>49324166
sammy sosa owes me something

>>49324662
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA he bought at $52 and is bagholding this shitcoin ever since keep COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPING AND SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEETHING LATEFAG BUT YOU WILL NEVER EVER MAKE IT YOU ARE JUST EXIT LIQ.

>>49324696
Why the negativity anon? its all love.
I sincerely hope fudding OGs like you will change to meaningful spoonfeeders again after next Friday like the maggot to the butterfly.

>>49324022
I’ll take A1 on my burger

>>49324822

How much APR ser

>>49324895
Yep nexx friday is bigmac time again. FUCKING YES

>>49324764
staking will be the same situation as with mainnet. mainnet is announced, comes out, /biz/ realizes literally nothing changes chainlink is still useless and doesn't do anything.
staking will come out, sergey will say it's currently in beta and you can only stake on testnet, cue 5 years of nothing.

>>49325068
So you're saying staking IS coming out?
WAGMI

>>49324721
>staking is here -sergey
>-11%

literally everyone here holds link and is hoping their bags get pumped, but is acting like a FUDer who hates link
honestly get a life

>>49325163
>literally everyone here holds link and is hoping their bags get pumped, but is acting like a FUDer who hates link
>honestly get a life

>>49325163
I hold link and im down 90% and seething

>>49324022
If stocks are down when staking comes out then LINK will also be down.

>>49324022
so staking is just optional for oracle nodes?

I honestly just want to put a portion of my stack to work. Even a small amount like 15k LINK to get my feet wet. Just give us the chance to make a yield on this shit

>>49324083
Where is the typo

>>49325163
Its odd isn't it? Gentleman like these guys
>>49325191
>>49325195
are most probably either mentally retarded or indian fud groups. However I am coming stronger than ever from the clouds of fud as should you.

>>49325227
biz is dead now after years we get staking and the thread is immediatly filled with indian fudders and retards there is no organic discussion happening anymore sad.
>inbf tnn 90% betray

>>49325195
Literally not possible, Sandeep.

bumpo

No bullshit what are the odds staking gets released next week.

All these hints playing with my emotions

>>49325240
Post your buy orders and bag right now you disgusting stinking bagholder or stfu. I only post in this thread because you faggots keep spamming the catalog with your baggie cope every single day.

>>49325533
checked for sure this time.

>>49325597
Thanks for the Hopium fren

>>49325533
They did this before with ccip and we not in june

>>49325533
It seems like it actually might happen. Id say 70% chance. Too many hints and seems like the quiet period is over.

>>49325711
checked.
they would not torture us that hard if it would be released in september. Also aligns with the decrypt piece where it was the first half year before the edit and the market.link overhaul their doing and some hints in the telegram and so on.
LPL ubermensch will make it not so sure about the non lplers.

>>49325533
Checked

In 2021, serg barely mentioned staking. 2022 1st of January he releases a video of him saying staking, ccip and enterprise layer this year. Then an article of coindesk or cointelegraph comes out which said staking in 2022 Q2. A couple of hours later the article got edited for just 2022. Sergey has been posting about staking a lot of times now. Consensus in 2019 was used for mainnet announcement.

I mean if they don't announce here, then I'm just gonna sell my remaining stack.

>>49324022
Fuck this I just opened a short on BTC.
Dump incoming in 3.. 2.. 1..

>>49325784
based poooler

>>49324632
He didn't say he would release it just that he finalized it.
Staking has been ready for 2 years without being released.

>>49325912
this they waited for the protocol to be matured which it is, still too early to mention staking back then for the sake of the holders.

>>49325360
what? seriously if staking is just optional for oracle nodes then this is some fucking big news, wtf.

>>49326265
They waited or the network to be profitable and scalable with Arbitrum.
Staking only works if the nodes are very profitable and the network big enough.

So what leverage should I use to dump BTC?
I was expecting a big dump after this tweet but it seems they don't care about rehashed news.
Maybe for Consensys?
I remember they like to dump BTC during big events to spread the idea to everyone that BTC always crashes...

>>49326294
yeah its not like you will choose nodes with highest stake that will trigger great buying pressure from existing and future node operators and retailers, nonono it will be very optional sirs.

>>49326426
if i have the choice between bloomberg with 0 LINK or some stinker with a bunch of chainlink he bought in the ICO for schizo reasons then i will surely choose bloomberg for my price data.

>>49326470
Great choice, because bloomberg will use the stinker node while making you pay triple the price pretending to run a node.

>>49326412
Consensys is best bet. 5x leverage short chainlink is better than btc

>>49326594
It's a big event for Chainlink though. This is no longer just some Eric Schmidt or WEF or Citi bank news. This directly impacts the LINK token. Shorting BTC is a safer bet since LINK might hold strong while BTC dumps. This has happened before. Of course what also followed was BTC just doing another leg down at which case LINK finally dumped. Unironically gonna open a 10x leverage short on BTC right before sergey hits the stage. I'll set a tight stop loss just in case something weird happens and BTC doesn't dump. I mean a lot of people still haven't caught on to this bullshittery. It's kind of a nice risk free high alpha trade. CPI number will come out on June 10th as well. It's basically lined up for a massive dump.

>>49326594
Linkies get in here this is a comfy mingle thread now.

https://www.youtube.co/watch?v=zKCrSN9oXgQ

>>49326591
they can run their own oracle node without staking according to the tweet in the OP.

I only have 100 link. Will I be able to stake them or should I just sell them and use thag money to gamble on bsc

>>49326594
agreed, too many staking related tweets for them not to release anything. finally blockchain serves a purpose besides muh dapp

>>49326728
That's not what it says at all. Where are you getting that from?

>>49326808
100 link = 2.1 btc

>>49326728
Why would they do that?
When you have a brand based company you sell trust by gauging your customers with theft level of prices for a shitty service that's externalized so that they don't provide any real service of real value but make a lot of money by pretending they do.

Chainlink with their definitive truth will eat them alive.

Has anyone checked the pivotal since 2019. kek

>>49324917

>>49326706
this. if you're not shorting BTC for Consensus you haven't been paying attention for the past year. we're literally guaranteed to get a big dump if link makes any big announcements

>>49326808
HOW DOES 8.1M SOUND EOY

>>49327294
And even if BTC doesn't dump, LINK is bound to get a pump, because LINK has always started pumping on all the massive news, it's just that BTC was right on time to dump and kill all the momentum.

>>49327294
>>49327362
is a 20$ pump possible? I hope we will increase some ranks and stay there as well. Long term circulating will be locked in nodes but I hope fomo will give us some juicy pa before that.

>>49327362
yep shorting BTC on link news has been a win win for awhile now. either BTC dumps, you profit, and roll those profits into more link or the trend of BTC dumping on link news ends and you get liquidated on your short but more than make up for it with link pumping.

>>49324863
the self-fudders are the ones who were spoonfed, they're not smart enough to be the spoonfeeders

>>49327719
You don't even have to get liquidated on BTC if you go with 5x leverage and set stoploss to 1% which means a 5% loss. Basically lets say BTC has a small rally with stocks rallying and BTC hits $35k by June 9th. Right before Sergey goes on stage, open up a short at $35 000, stoploss at $35 350 5x leverage(you lose 5% if it pumps). Right when announcement hits, wait like 5 mins for the dump. Usually the dumps have happened quite right away. With 10x leverage u lose 10% on the stop.

Is this a good time to buy? About to pull the trigger on a 500 buck purchase(poorfag). Doesn't seem like it goes much lower than it is now, but I've been bogged several times thinking that already.

>>49328010
> should I buy the week before what just might be the biggest announcements in Chainlink history and will drive the price sky high?

no

>>49328010
do it and be ready to buy if it gets lower. These times of cheap linkies will be over eventually.

>>49328010
I seriously wouldn't waste my peace of mind worrying about $500 unless I was 16.

>>49328010
Yes its a good time to buy. No one knows the exact bottom but this is literally a god tier buying opportunity.

>>49328031
>>49328037
>>49328046
>>49328050
Thanks, I'll probably try and slurp up 100 of them for now.

>>49328010
typically LINK dumps after events, so you might consider buying some now and some after consensus.

>t. 6k link victim

>>49324166
Sandy Salami knows where our money is!

>>49324721
i want to believe, but i have this dread that they'll do something like "announce and later anouncement" and we'll have to wait until smartcon where they'll say our implementation is finalized.

I've held since the beginning but if we don't get staking this year i'm going to snap.

>>49328277
With mainnet it was 2 weeks of notice. Probably same with staking so the nodes can prepare unless they have already talked to the nodes.

>>49328401
21/6

>>49328446

>>49328401
Weren't there a bunch of linkies being moved to nodes a few days ago?

>>49328579
there were 14 new addresses that received the same amount of link, in the millions. the hope is that they are node addresses.
also that was a month ago

>>49324166
Smeagol Slytherin where the FUCK is my pay-out

LOOKS LIKE STEAK IS BACK 9N THE MENU BOYZ

Give LINK your energy

>>49328949
>>49328790
sending it. The macs gonna be extra juicy on Friday.

I'm skeptical that anything positive will result from this conference. the market is full of "smart" people who aped into Luna, OHM forks, and dogcoins. Sergey could tell them the current data feed lineup nets $10 billion annual and they'd sell because it's not 20,000% apr

>>49329368
from some point on retail won't matter, that's why we are excited about staking, ccip and the abstraction layer.

>>49329388
ofc but right now retail "VC," early miners, and mev insiders run the show and that's the program.

Where is my money, Enrique T. Salem?

Will there be a livestream for consensus?

>>49325784
what were some of the hints in the telegram?

>>49331065
a community manager on Telegram says that historically big things were announced at Consensus

>>49329388
This. If it was dependent on retail i'd've been out a long time ago. This is why retail not pumping the price doesn't matter. Big money will begin buying when they need to. But we're well ahead of them, not that they'll care.

>>49331432
the bullish case is that 7.11$ is the start even before the official announcement next week for the infinite demand to be kicked off initially by retail. Meaning we could be at the bottom from where link will grow organically into the thousands on. Exciting times take a seat anon.

>>49328010
buy $100 now
and another $100 before consensus
at a minimum.
LINK wont go lower than $5 unless it is a scam wick.
I may put a $1000 order at $4.50 for the lulz
ive been packing my bags this last week

$1000 eoy. We are going to make it boys!

>>49324022
I am unironically the most powerful meme magician that regularly posts on the ch0n, with an active flow of kundalini strengthened by thousands of hours of meditation and ancient yogic exercises/magick techniques my will and intent alone has shaped world events that will echo throughout history. I have deemed that Chainlink will succeed and make many anons insanely rich ushering in a new enlightenment era to save humanity from the forces of darkness that have been working behind the shadows for thousands of years thinking they will seal their plans of global dominance. The dark is extinguished by the light as light cannot exist without the dark by the laws or polarity. You have been graced with a few more months to accumulate, do not squander it and join in the great work of raising up our planetary consciousness/a future worth living in.

>>49324166
You don't know what you're messing around with. Delete this post.

>>49324056
>Hundreds of millions of Link waiting to be staked
>Very little actual demand for decentralized data
0.1% is probably optimistic. If the APY is any higher its because Sergey is subsidizing stakers.
But its a smart move for him. He couldn't sell all the Link he is sitting on anyway, so by introducing staking he lures in more buyers to dump 500k Link into on a weekly basis.

>>49332496
Why do you faggots still do this. Nobody who doesn't have a stack of link browses this board anymore, its fucking dead, its literally just us, some jeets, and glowies. That's it.

>>49324022
>mention staking once or twice a year
>never actually release it
real talk I feel like a fucking donkey while serg is dangling the staking carrot in front of me
I should know better but I keep hoping every single fucking year and yet nothing happens
sunk cost fallacy at its finest and I even know it and yet I can do nothing about it because I am weak

>>49324166
based salsa

>>49324022
Your shitcoin is going back to ICO price $0.11 and once it goes to $0.10 100% of l*nk baggies will be at a loss.

>>49332712
The first step of improving is acknowledging that you've been played.
You can still get out now at above $7 and not at $5 after the nothingburger event next week.

>>49325533
It can't get released next week. It needs two weeks before it's ready.

>>49326808
>should I sell my link?

unironically NGMI

>>49325240
Im literally a day 1 link marine.
Im down like 85-90% from ath, and so are all of you.

Newfags and normies will now get to buy at cheap price feom years ago, years of us holding has been completely neutralized.
My dissapointment is immeasurable and my year is ruined.

>>49333037
Fuck off faggot. This is the 4th time weve been down 80%+. Its nothing new.

>$7.20

>>49324022
IS THAT A MOTHER HECKIN' TWEET? BY PAUL LOGAN AND TOM HOLLAND'S UNHOLY BABY THIS DESERVES A BREW! DADDY SERGEY NEVER LETS US DOWN

>>49333073
It dropped over 90% in price, that has literally never happened before you little gay twink, kinda turning me on. Pics of your begging asshole?

>>49325533
Think about it this way. Why has Chainlink been tweeting so much about staking recently if they are planning to announce staking at Consensys anyways? Its kind of like blowing your load early. And Im not trying to claim they are trying to build hype or pump the price. Im just saying, if staking at Consensys is such a sure bet, why even waste their time slot on a staking announcement? They might as well announce staking on twitter and use their time slot to talk about anything else. Maybe I have become conditioned to be an extreme contrarian due to link dumping on bullish news, thats possible. Im just not seeing staking at Consensys. I think itll be more of the same slides pretty much, maybe some talk about the general crypto industry progress since last year or whatever.

>inb4 dog coins

There has been progress, the dogcoin shittery just distracted you from it.

>>49325533
Checked
I reckon ccip will be released, they'll probably keep staking and enterprise for smartcon

How many slaves will we be able to buy

>>49332905
this meme will never die will it.

Token not needed. Do not fall for notorious scammer sergey navarov and chainlink labs fraud company formed in cayman islands SCAM

>Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates in a rare joint statement announce that they are moving all of their money to Link
>+0.17%

Its honestly wrapped around to being hilarious. Its hilarious that BTC will take a huge fat dump in September during smartcon

>>49333942
If chainlink ever actually dropped good news this might be true. Problem is 3 years of radio silence doesn't give much to work with.

>>49326265
anon, you need to choose the right token to stake not all of them are profitable.

i dont think link is going to pump all that much at all. I mean the network is in effect right now. The only thing that changes is instead of sergey paying for everyone else will.

>>49335781
but staking with KOLnet does, and the exciting part is that they reward pre-sale tokens of the project that they are working with.

>>49324245

>can’t even get the first piece of the chain right
We have fallen so far

>>49333252
What the fuck are you even saying lmao

Scam scam scam
Fat fat fat

>>49336441
Nigger nigger nigger

>>49333960
what

>>49325912
kek, stop hoping just go with NFT after honeyland Genesis Eggs got sold out the staking was open right away. NFT is the future anon.

>>49337541
NFT is still risky almost 90% are scams it's just your lucky day anon. Don't get your hopes too high.

>>49333252
What the fuck does this even mean

>>49332550
They're being paid to. Why wouldn't they?

>>49333960
I would argue that the Jan 1st announcement of staking, ccip and enterprise was good news. Perhaps you think otherwise

>>49333960
>>49340172
Not to mention the AP, Accuweather, Deutsche Telekom news, ...

>>49324166
keyser sozano

>>49325360
>>49325360
Staking doesn't mean shit, it's gonna dump

Just converted some ETH to 6k link
What am I in for? How will link perform in relation to ETH longterm? Was that wise?

>>49340259
You're fr done for no cap RIP bozo

>>49340265
bussin?

Just posting it while I still can

>>49340303
You literally need to pay nodes in Link tokens to use VRF.

>>49340317
And do people use VRF? /checkmate

>>49340259
I have done similarly, I'm gambling that it bottomed vs eth
But it's still getting fucked in sats

>>49340323
>And do people use VRF?
lol yes

>>49340355
That must be why the price of chainlink has been steadily going up then, OH WAIT

>>49340362
We were talking about the token being needed.

>>49340380
The token being needed would drive the price up, dont you think?

>>49340419
But the token is objectively needed.

So your logic is completely bunk.

>>49340425
Ah so the token being needed does not mean the price of said token will go up, great.

>>49340457
The same is true for pretty much all assets.

>>49324022
I'll love to explore these staking features as a LINK marine, kek. But whilst waiting it's a good thing that my SYLO and Rowan are respectively earning me over 40% APY on liquidity mining and staking of the tokens respectively.
Fucking DYOR fags and don't come ranting here. Stating the obvious

Scammers treat chainlink threads like the super bowl, cramming as many shitty ads into them as possible

I feel like Frodo when they were climbing Mount Doom. We're so close but i can't go on any longer. Please, someone needs to carry me that last bit

>>49324022
Staking is priced in. If you cant see that, its over for you.

>>49341042
Why not lend me your linkies, let me carry them for a while

>>49324632
>>49324822
>>49325191
>>49325569
>holding link makes brown people so angry they will come into link threads just to rage about it
lmao

>>49341074
My Linkies are too strong for you, traveller

>>49325533
I don't think so but if it did it'll release to zero fanfare. There would be a lot of 'OH NO NO NO's and then slowly it might gain traction.

>>49340457
It's funny because on a closer inspecting, it's not sufficient for the token to be needed, the demand needs to exceed the supply and without a mechanism taking LINK out of circulation, this couldn't happen. If only nodes needed to keep some of the LINK they earn to stake it as a collateral.
So a more proper fud image would be "TOKEN SUPPLY EXCEEDS DEMAND"
Someone get to it.

>>49324166
Salvator Salami, wheres my money??

>>49341211
If you make it in 2D I will turn it into fancy 3D

>>49341074
Alright anon. I'll just need you to give me your linkies first so I can inspect you are a true marine

>>49325533
3%. They dont need to hint it with breadcrumbs. They will just say when its live.

WHY IS THERE NO CONSENSUS PRE.PUMP YET????

>>49342982
Priced in. Good chance we dump a bit even if the news is bullish.

>>49342982
They’re cratering the global economy to prevent a meteoric link pump

>>49341074
idgi if boromir turned out to be a good guy after all wouldn't it have been fine to give him the ring for a bit?

>>49343737
this but unironically

>>49342982
Maybe there isn't any announcement...

>>49347211
There is...
"Chainlink Labs requires more funds, so we will resume our weekly tokens sales."

lol I forgot the name of that guy who got doxxed for calling some anons unpotty trained niggers

>>49335885
You are retarded

>>49348058
Sean Rutledge

>>49347607
What fud have you got planned if staking gets announced next week? Can we have a sneak preview?

>>49348173
kek thanks anon
I wonder what the lad is up to right now

>>49343737
>(((They)))
When will you stop blaming an imaginary secreet society for your own failures

>>49348278
CANCEL THIS MAN1!1!1!1!1!1

Is it possible LINK prices does not pump after Staking/CCIP are announced?

>>49348638
I personally think this is a likely outcome. No giga pump, just steady growth for years to come

>>49348799
Yeah, steady growth to $25 in 2026

>>49348799
I'm soo tired bros. Been holding since 2017

I just want to quick wage slaving

>>49348058
I'm never helping you offbrand niggers again. Stay poor, stay unpotty trained.

>>49348913
>bought in 2017
>still don't know how staking works

>>49349012
I do know how staking works.

With LINK past performance I wouldn't be surprise the announcement does nothing to the price

>>49325885
>this worked
LMAO

>>49349104
>he thinks announcements are what's pumping the price
No, you clearly don't

>>49349166
Do you see the effects of locked supply to be effective immediatly? My guess is they will limit the stake quantity initially and gradually expand it. With ccip staking should become a game changer hopefully sooner than later.

bump

>>49348233
>imaginary
Anon, I…

>>49349448
Arbitrum sequencer nodes 1.2m identical 12 wallets as full fearured link nodes with fss will be a proving ground

>>49349166
Worked when Elon announced BTC payments for Teslas.
Bullish announcements tend to pump the prices of investments.

But go ahead, gaslight us into thinking this does not apply to Chainlink for some totally legit reason.

>>49351707
>But go ahead, gaslight us into thinking this does not apply to Chainlink for some totally legit reason.
Not him, but there's a pretty obvious reason why announcements for LINK don't pump the price.

>>49351984
Absolutely.
But I'm pretty sure that guy is trying to imply announcements never pump crypto, I've seen people swear it up and down for hours on end (but only in Link threads of course).

>>49349448
>limit
Yes, Sergey actually said that token holders would be able to stake "some of" their tokens. Not many seemed to pick up on that and I figure it means just as you say. Could be a percentage of each wallet's contents or a fixed number. Rather it was the former..