/biz/ - Business & Finance

thanks marine

>>4840142
Outstanding Intel Son. This is some welcomed news!

oh no my links are gone..

srsly tho can someone post screenshot of op's link?

>>4840142

LINK confirmed to be $100 EOY 2018

It's a medium article... Go read it.

huge

>>4840275
No

>>4840142
Thanks anon good one

>>4840142

Is this a legit company? Where can I find more info about signal capital?

Chainlink is my second biggest hodl. I have 2500 tokens, am I gonna make it guys

Guess the cat's out of the bag.

>>4840934
Haha my first thought when I read this article was you! I was a believer. Thanks bro.

>>4840869
me too, I've got 5k

>>4840934
you are a demon, sir

>>4840934
I love you Ass Blaster #nohomo

>>4840934
>>4840945
Boom. Same. Max comfy achieved.

>>4840934
what's the next pick?

>>4840934
No shit that's your firm?
I have been in all your threads and I think you're a cool nigga, but how do we know that you didn't just write this yourself, Signal Capital is real and legit, but this is a brand new account? They've said the same things you have, timezones check out and everything, and the whole paper is factual, regardless.

I don't do picks, I'm not here to shill coins, I've moved past chasing pumps and trying to flip a quick profit. The people investing in LINK right now aren't going to be buying themselves lambos, they're going to be building dynasties.

>>4841270

I can't prove that this isn't all a series of coincidences/carefully orchestrated plans. Likewise even if they are going public with this information I could still in theory get in trouble, there are NDAs that are still technically binding. So I can't explicitly state anything, but I will continue to present the information I have, when I can as events unfold. I will never ever shill you any coins and I gain nothing from you guys buying LINK at this stage.

>>4841376
I'm not attacking you or anything senpai, and even if you are a LARPer, I love a good LARP, I emailed the company asking for verification on the article and the profile that posted it. I'll give you this headsup in case you are
a.) LARPing, to cover your ass
b.) under an NDA with said company and will get in some real shit for writing that, so cover your ass or;
c.) A real nigga, in which case, thanks for your info my dude, I wont forget you when I make it.
For the other anons, I will post my results ITT if I get a response soon, and would suggest NOT spamming their email too much to scare them away.

>>4841284
i want a dynasty! hmm..... crypto-dynasty, dao realms, AI churches... very cyberpunk. i like it.

holyfuck, its over boys, we made it labmbos, who ever had 10 k linkes million'er in q3/q4 2018. this is fucking huge. ofcouse non linkers start fud.

>>4841482
My next memetic campaign will be dynasty warriors in honour of the assblaster

>>4840934

What's your take on this article?

Why did they bother writing this article on normium? I would think a company like that would not advertise to the world what they are investing in by default.

Marketing and supermoon soon?

>>4841376

> $10-$20

Do you agree with their price predictions?

>>4841687
Now that their bags are full, they've started shilling.

>>4841687
It's like fund manager.
You have to says something to money owners how and where you put their money in.
This is clear example of that, so you won't get sued for making to high risk portfolios.

just a friendly reminder that the success of ChainLink != opportunities for ChainLink.

don't all-in.

>>4841472
Son of a bitch, I am losing a bit of faith in the validity of the article (the creator, not the information within)
The profile was recently created, only posted once, today, has a logo that does not conform to any known Signal Capital logos, and is being posted on the slack by a Michael Anderson, who claims to be from Signal Capital, he has said that he is a "top 15 wallet" in chainlink on the 29th of November. I'm not saying that is isn't legit, but I'm having a very difficult time manually gaging if this did, in fact, come from Signal Capital. It is possible that this is a ploy from AssBlaster, Michael Anderson, both (possibly the same people) to pump the price. Certainly AssBlaster would be able to tell us a little more info about this article?

>>4841687
>>4841722

Guys I'm being honest with you because something fishy is going on. I think someone who read through my threads maybe deduced the firm or what group of firms I work with. Because when I skimmed that medium article and read their price targets I became *very* suspicious. That breaks all our protocols. If you recall my previous threads I said my firm was going to be moving in first but that other firms in our groups were also exploring various cryptocurrencies and yes we do discuss LINK occassionally etc. Well one of those firms is called Signal Capital, when I saw the medium thread I just assumed they were going forward with this investment. But closer investigation and I'm thinking this is a fraud, I might ask some colleagues but I might not because it will come off suspicious (our firms are very paranoid about insider trading, so if I ask people who work at Signal 'oh hey btw are you investing in LINK' how will they know I'm not passing that info on to family or friends). Regardless I hesitated until now to say anything because I didn't want to incriminate myself in any way (even acknowledging I work in London narrows the pool of possible candidates for who I am, etc).

Hope this is clear, will answer any questions.

>>4841850
u know y price suppressed until now at 15 cent, accumulation done. now marketing start. to the moon

>>4841850
>>4841889

See my post, I am also skeptical of the validity of this Medium article. I think some turbo autist managed to guess a firm that is closely related to where I work and push it forward in light of the big thread we had recently to make it seem believable. See: >>4841874

Either way do not believe this article, the minute you see price targets you know it's just shilling, and if price targets were discussed it would not be in the same release acknowledging an initial investment. Normally price targets would be discussed at a later date, once a working mainnet is in place.

>>4841874
The OP on reddit linking to this article deleted his account, did anybody catch it?
AssBlaster, I hope for your sake that you aren't behind this, because you may have just fucked your life up trying to pump this coin.
Do you think that your firm will pull out do to these shenanigans?

>>4841874
who cares u retard, link has potential, lot of ppl, firms jumping in to buy. if link does not have potential who will buy it.

>>4841927

No, my firm is not related to signal. Why would I ever take that kind of risk, if I know my firm is investing in it that would inspire more confidence than any pointless medium article.

What has me more concerned is how this guy managed to narrow down my place of employment to like within two degrees of separation. I guess you guys were right about me revealing too much info.

>>4841940

This^ anon seems suspicious as fuck. You should NEVER pump a coin like LINK, that is classic pajeet tactics, short term gains then leave it broken and wasted. LINK is going to be a slow burn.

>>4841975

Clarification: my firm is related to Signal in a professional manner, but not in an oversight sense. My firm isn't going to change course because of some poorly orchestrated LARP as another firm.

>>4841975
OP, I need you to make a throw away email address, I am on to something here, but do not want to post it for a whole bunch of retarded assbergers to fuck up.

>>4841975
>>4841975
except price prediction, rest of the article is pretty much good and informative, if u look at all coins like omg, iota,steem, there are tons of articles about price prediction articles from businesses and individuals. so we cannot control the ppl. if link had strength it will blow up as simple as that. otherwise given fid in the board it would have been wiped out from cmc by this time

>>4842006

nazjsyxc@sharklasers.com

>>4842068

I think it's pretty clear you're a part of this shilling operation.

>>4842148
lol, I am bag holder. i dont care shilling or fud until q4 2018. go ahead with u r conspiracy theories

>>4842068
Chasing those 60% a day? don't ya?

>>4842148
manderson [12:13 AM]
sorry for any confusion, were a new fund focused specifically on cryptocurrencies and do not have any affiliation to the real estate private equity fund in London


[12:14]
ChainLink is our first public position, hence the lack of background but happy to clear anything up

>>4842291
some one posted in slack

>>4842291

Sounds bullshit then, they're copying the name of the private equity firm, I mean really what have they done? Bought 2 link?

Ok guys pack it up, it's all a big nothing.

>>4842291
I am still digging, but I got this information first in DM. He also gave me their website, moresignal.com
And his email michael@moresignal.com
Will keep digging.

>>4842345
WHOIS shows registration in 2013, but has a block on all other dox.

>>4842251
Shouldn't you be somewhere flinging your shit at Pakistanis?

>signal capital
Who? They put some effort into the article but damn its pretty clear this is a shill.

>>4841284
>I'm not here to shill coins
>The people investing in LINK right now aren't going to be buying themselves lambos, they're going to be building dynasties

ass blaster called it

>>4842322
What are the odds that 2 Signal Capitals invest in ChainLink at the same time?
I am more inclined to believe you, that this was another autist's larp, than manderson in slack.
PS, if moresignal.com (careful of your LINKS) is legit, then he will have no problem with me sharing this picture of him :)

>>4842419
not shilling if true

>>4842419

Learn to distinguish between meme-ing and actual shilling.

Shilling = POWR ABOUT TO PUMP! 75 CENTS INCOMING!!! CONFERENCE TMRW!!!

Memeing = What will you do when 1 LINK = 1MM USD?

>>4842494

This is some turbo autists trying to capitalise on my claims by faking some shit.

>>4842520
For what reason would you tripfag up and larp like an attention whore if not for shilling.

>guize im such an insider link is going to be massive i post 20 times a thread and use correct grammar/punctuation so its safe to believe me
These tactics have been used before dude.. You're only giving false hope to the bag holders, not convincing anyone to buy in.

>>4842560
u non linker fuck off. and stay poor

>>4842520
The only thing throwing me off is the sheer amount of research they would've had to do, considering I couldn't find shit on you other than you lived in London, and your past posts under your old trip, and the fact that he is shilling his 4 year old website, which is completely non-functioning by the way, just looks cool. I could even forgive the 2 Signal Capitals investing, because I unironically believe in meme magic, like your double quads.
regardless faith: unshaken in ChainLink, even with the heathens and their tricks.

>>4842560

Because I wanted to have some people to talk about LINK with, I had a lot of fun in that long thread, just discussing stuff with people who already invested.

Do you really believe a coin with 6MM volume will be affected by a single /biz/ thread?

It's lonely at the top.
I truly understand that feeling.

I believe you, AssBlaster. You seem like a cool guy. Hopefully you don't get in trouble in your company and instead we all ride Lambos on the Moon together with Sergey.

>>4842614
>>4842494
Just so you know I didn't pull that website out of my ass, he hasn't even posted this in general yet.

>>4842610

Just to clarify my firm isn't Signal Capital, it's just one of the firms we work with. It wouldn't take that much research, think like this:

>See thread
>Figure out anon is in London
>Look up list of private equity firms in London
>Pick one of a reasonable size to correspond to the one I described working for

From here two outcomes: if it's the firm I work for, the hit the jackpot, I confirm etc.

If it's not the firm I work, all these firms have at least some professional contact with each other, I would assume that this firm was just doing the same shit my firm was and would corroborate the story. They know that because I don't want to get investigated for insider trading I'd be unlikely to actually confront the company directly. Their plan almost worked until they included those price targets. Shills never learn.

But yeah it's an impressive achievement, but certainly doable.

>>4842577
fk u

>>4842614
>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Is what I live by

>>4842674

Maybe it is meme magic and it's a weird a.f. coincidence, fuck. Imagine if I ended up calling up S.C. in London, getting investigated and getting fired over this kind of coincidence holy shit.

>>4842614
i don't care whether larp or not. entertaining stuff.

i do wish there was some kind of update though, some info on recent developments, but i also appreciate focusing on the business / partnerships rather than shilling. actually gives me more confidence in the long-term.

can't wait till launch, should be exciting.

That's what I call good link thread. Thank you guys.
See you later

>>4842712
I don't know what to think. Either he hit the jackpot with a guess.
Or we hit the jackpot in meme magic with double Signals.
Hope I didn't fuck you over senpai, I did accidentally email the OTHER Signal Capital before I grilled him in slack.
I'll send another saying I was mistaken.

>>4842712
only could happen in Biz

>>4841284
how many LINK should i hold for a dynasty senpai?

>>4842931

Pick a number of generations you want your dynasty extending forward. 50k * 2^n where n = number of generations after you.

>>4841472
shit I emailed them too... should've assumed biz would be on this but felt like a go-getter...

noone else email, lets see what they say

will post a new thread if it takes time to hear back

>>4843041
AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH I don't even have 30k yet
JUST FUCK MY DYNASTY UP

>>4843074
Read the rest of my posts, senpai.
Not even the same company. I already sent them another email saying I confused them with another firm in the States.

How old is the article?

At this point I'm inclined to believe the article is an intentional fraud and ASSBLASTER is a committed and articulate LARPer. Fun times either way, desu. I'm already all in on LINK I can't go much all-in-er

>>4843292
at a minimum the fact that this coin's potential can inspire this level of LARPing and work is amazing and a sign in and of itself

>>4843292
Just fomod in fuck if its fake someone really went out of their way