/biz/ - Business & Finance

HAVENT ACCUMULATED ENOUGH YET ITLL DIP R-RIGHT

U CUNT I thought it was a Larp
I was going to get to 100k links tomorrow and now its all Fuucckd

>>4801306
Buying for 30 cents is better than for $1 so act fast

>>4801306

I actually said in my post that I knew no one would believe me, but my goal is to keep posting whatever tidbits I can and hopefully eventually people will trust me. Also I can't reveal how much the other firms put in, but we put down 14MM USD executed when the price was around 16 cents, under the counter negotiations for bulk sum we basically got 100MM of the LINK. In essence the firm I work for PERSONALLY got 10% of all the LINK. Best part is now I can't get in any trouble, especially since the price of LINK went down from when I posted to when we executed the deal. I still can't reveal my firms name (NDAs etc) and because related firms may still want to buy in at a relatively low price.

So in essence you might as well assume almost 30% of currently distributed LINK is now in the hands of ONE (relatively) small private firm, expressly for the purpose of node establishment. Let that sink in. 100MM LINK that will NEVER sell.

I still never get why /biz/ thought I was shilling, especially when there was 0 chance you guys would pump the price. I strongly recommend one of you guys look through the archived thread, some idiot even argued that a 7 figure price injection wouldn't move the price of LINK, kek.

P.S. I propose that we make Dennis Reynolds the new face of ChainLINK, posting some OC myself in support of this.

>>4801534
But that's retarded. These firms could have had LINK literally for free. Because at least 350 M tokens are saved for such purpose and to favour the implementation of the first nodes.

>>4802142

Wrong, I addressed this in my original thread. Sergey has an immense amount of vision and ambition, he is saving those 350MM LINK for the truly BIG firms, like Citibank. All joking aside, Sergey commands an immense degree of respect precisely because he doesn't participate in the skateboard antics of the OMG team and shit. You have to understand that he isn't building LINK for you guys, he is building it for big corporations and firms, people with whom he is meeting with and working with regularly, that's why he seems so inactive to you guys, because he has his eyes on the end game. Anyways firms like mine are hoping to be relatively small node operators (small compared to the big guys obviously), you have to understand that from our point of view 350MM LINK set aside for nodes seems like a lot, but if Sergey achieves even 10% of what he wants to, that 350MM LINK is nowhere near enough to meet the demand. In other words what the fuck is he supposed to tell, say the 10 biggest banks, that he can't give them X amount of LINK because he gave a bunch away for literal pennies to some small firm?

>>4802352
Wtf is this shit. Am I going to get rich or not?

>>/biz/thread/S4246712#p4246792

Hmm, ok. I believe you. I'm considering adding to my position, but I'm waiting for a short term dip. Do you think that's a good idea, or should I just FOMO now?

>>4802471
I think I'll go ahead and add to my position.

In the long run, a .10 cent difference isn't going to matter all that much. And like you said, I think LINK is one of those 1/10 cases where 4chan is really, really right about something.

Thanks

>>4802352
what is your prediction for Link? When is it all coming together?

>>4801212
>groups of firms

>>4801212
I remember you OP, if it's really you

You're trying way too hard, OP

>>4801534
well, there was a movement in devs' wallets, did your firm buy from the devs?

>as if they wouldnt have purchased their tokens directly from smartcontract.com's stash of 350MM
>in which case nothing would be reflected on binance whatsoever

So you're from LinkPool?

>>4802352
Damn, you literally just talk air. Lmao is /biz/ this fucking retarded?

>>4802411

If a) you have over 10K LINK, and b) nothing bad happens to Sergey, you will never *have* to work again in your life. You won't be in Lamboland, and you'll have to be careful with your money, but you'll never have to work again.

>>4802471

No idea, as I explained here: >>4802222 LINK will dip until one day it doesn't, then it will move sideways, then probably pump one more time, then announcement and instant correction to 40x its current price. The way Sergey is working on this, imagine if every single partnership that came out for Ripple over the last two years came out for LINK in a single day. That's the kind of event we're talking, a price singularity.

>>4802646

Personally I believe May 2018 is when it will happen, for three reasons: a) Sergey is a workaholic and ironically always sets himself a huge amount of work but also always gets it done before people expect. b) A lot of firms want this done by the start of summer so they can spend summer prepping/deploying/announcing, thus having everything up and running by start of the fiscal year 2018. (I believe the last big pump and dip before price singularity will consequently be in April).

>>4802721
As in my firm invested 7 figures, but several other firms we have close professional ties with have LINK on their radar. Hence group of firms as in people i have exposure to.

>>4802741
See tripcode, it is me.

>>4802837
I am not trying anything, just answering what people tell me. Just look at the timeline of events if you doubt me.

>>4802915
I have addressed this dozens of times, Sergey is saving this for the BIG FISH. We are small fish in the grand scheme of things, it will look really bad if Sergey sells to us, despite what you believe Sergey plans for LINK to be relevant many years down the line and to have many partnerships.

>>4802923
Nope.

give yourself some persona OP and I'm adding you to our honorary group

>>4803005
>If a) you have over 10K LINK, and b) nothing bad happens to Sergey, you will never *have* to work again in your life. You won't be in Lamboland, and you'll have to be careful with your money, but you'll never have to work again.
hope you're right. how much do i need for lamboland

Assblaster, I remember the first thread, your timeline six weeks was spot on.

I salute you comrade. Do you have a personal holding?

>>4802352

I've also read in sergey's writings that he values the aspect of crypto that it allows the average joe to get into the highly lucrative tech startup investment game that they've been shut out of and normally the exclusive territory of VCs and angel investors, provided the regular joe isn't too dumb to see it of course.

He really does seem like an incredible guy and your posts make that even more clear. I have no doubt we'll hear more from him personally in the future.

>>4803109
sO EASY

>>4801212
What happen if i get 120k link right now

this is awesome, 100 mill link off market, thats 1/3rd of active supply. we're going to rocket

>>4803307
The pump continues

I feel like the fucking cats are holding back this mooning further. If people's ether wasn't stuck in limbo we'd probably see more volume

>>4803119

Depends how much you'd need to buy a Lambo, I wouldn't buy a lambo unless I had 10+ MM.


>>4803198
Personally holding 200k, about to drop another half a Bitcoin on Binance. Just waiting for some transactions to clear. Will post screencap to confirm. Will probably dump a total of 4BTC on LINK over the next week. (Had a leveraged long on Bitmex I'm going to cash in soon).

>>4803209
This

>>4803307
On Christmas day 2020 one of two things will happen: you will look back on how you lost 24000 USD in 2017, or you will be a multimillionaire, literally.

>>4803329
Indeed.

>>4803406
How old are you? How the fuck do you have so much money

>>4803307
You'll get very rich in the foreseeable.
And have your dick sucked plenty.
i.e. you'll be hella comfy

>>4803406
Dude I fucking love you. Here's a free "you" because I have nothing else

>>4801212
What should we invest in next, my lord?

>>4801212
Where can i buy Link safely?

>>4803406
thoughts on REQ?

So is this some elaborate gag to get people to buy your bags your bags or what's up?

>>4803444
>those fucking trips
i'm going all in very soon anon

>>4803592
Yep. that's exactly what it is. LINK is a scam don't buy it

>>4803436

Been on 4chan since I was 14 (2006) got into crypto relatively early (2011), didn't become a multimillionaire because I could only invest the money a 18 year old had. Most important thing I did however was continuously tell my dad and his boomer friends about bitcoin and just in general learned as much about blockchain as possible. Leveraged my reputation in 2014 when I was 22 to get a job in a firm with interest in bitcoin (this is when blockchain was really starting to explode in firms), since then I've worked my ass off along with careful and calculated trading, but through all the years I have never been able to leave 4chan.

>>4803488

Cheers

>>4803515

Honestly trust in /biz/s instincts and overall sentiment, LINK is an ace, there's no denying something like LINK comes once in a blue moon. I personally believe that things generally come in threes, my personal theory is LINK will complete the big three of crypto. Much like most industries have a big 3.

That being said the other coins I strongly recommend are Monero, Req, Vertcoin. OMG is pretty good too. I was invested in CSNO but I cashed it out today. Ark is also good. The key is to trust in the overall sentiments of /biz/ will ignoring obvious shilling (very repetitive style of post, lack of diverse memes etc, e.g. POWR/BCH). None of what I am saying is due to insider knowledge though, just reading the general sentiment. Also a pro tip: catagorise investments as brand based and tech based. Never sell tech based investments. ARK and XMR are tech based imo. REQ and OMG are more brand based. While I really like REQ, most of it's value comes from aiming to be user friendly and convenient, contrast this with XMR which has truly unrivalled technology.

>>4803657
I think you're lying to me.

>>4803694
no no anon trust me i'm an anonymous internet user and I know more than trillion dollar financial institutions

>>4802352
Link to original thread plz?

>>4803686
do you think Ethereum will retain its position five years from? what do you see as far as it solving its scaling problems?

what about iota? i work in iot and am dubious of its value prop

>>4803814
It was posted on this thread, read it.

>>4803862
iotas politics are gonna murder it

>>4803761
Well if you say so how could you be wrong.

Just spent my last penny on Link, OP actually delivered, his prediction was spot on.

Now let's all have faith in Sergey.

Tell us more about Sergey, why is he gaining so much weight? Is he a stress eater?

I'm already a deluded arkie.

I'm unironically tempted to become a deluded linkie as well.

If I dropped $1000 on this right now what could I expect January of 2018?

>>4803814

Original thread: https://yuki.la/biz/4246712

Follow up warning: >>4542708 (You) (Cross-thread)

>>4803862
I am not some sort of oracle, so don't really take my advice on other coins too seriously. I think ETH will grow, and it's market share will as well.

Iota is doomed not because of politics but because Iota is literally 'too good to be true', I personally follow a rule of never investing in something too good to be true. Infinite scalability, no transaction fees, and decentralisation? They must compromise on something and then I notice that the devs always scream about how great the transactions and scalability is but they never really advertise it's decentralisation because that is it's achilles heel.

Iota is like the person who discovers perpetual motion but then realises this one tiny but critical flaw in it, but has already put so much work and energy into it that they can't admit to the world that the entire thing is failed from birth. So what scares me the most about Iota is that unlike other projects that develop and have issues, everything with Iota is going smoothly except they basically know they cannot solve this key issue and are hoping for some deus ex machina to solve this issue.

>>4803516
second this, with binance causing a hissy fit and bitfinex is looking like it's going out in a boom.
I tend to use shapeshift but LINK ain't available there.

>>4803961
Why don't you wait for the ark moon, sell, buy link?

Guys, I‘m actually fucking fucked right now.
I‘m just gonna ask where the Coinbase HQ is.
They are holding 10k Eurobucks and I couldn’t invest into Link for like 3 days.

>>4804001
>Coinbase'd

>>4803694
Nah but seriously don't. It's not like biz has been crazy about this since the start. It's not like Sergey actually working.

You'r ebetter off buying SIGT and MOON and joining pnd groups. Definitely don't invest in one of the booming fundamental technologies of crypto

Life is made of before and afters. This is one now.

"Why didn't I buy BTC back in 2011 again? What was my reason? Fucksake I'm a fool. I'll never let that oppurtunity pass me again."

"Why didn't I buy LINK back in 2017 again? What was my reason? Fucksake I'm a fool. I'll never let that oppurtunity pass me again."

Guys like I said I'm about to buy 0.4 BTC worth of LINK, here's a screencap, I will execute as soon as this is posted, in case people question my confidence.

>>4803961
He just said he is expecting april until price skyrockets.

So you can trade your silly coins until then.

>>4804056
You said 4 btc m8

>>4804081
He said he's hoping to put 4btc in on Christmas

>>4803988
damn where do we go to get exposure to people with experience like you, its a breath of fresh air. I agree w general Biz sentiments which is why im 40k LINK but the shiling/fudding here it gets tiring

>>4804081
Oh my god, learn how to read, he said 0.4 right now and 4 BTC by christmas.

>>4804104
>>4804117
>Will probably dump a total of 4BTC on LINK over the next week

Fucking retards

>>4804048
Yeah always thought those pnd groups looked good. Very polite and inviting guys with nice names like pajeet. Maybe I will do that instead of reading up on LINK.
Thanks for the tips. You've been very helpful.

>>4804056
I highly appreciate your informative contribution to the community, but you should know that screencaps don't prove shit, inspect element is a thing.

>>4804081

I said 4BTC over the whole week, in 0.4 BTC installments, I hold a bitmex long position on BTC I wouldn't cash it all out now. I withdraw and cash out investments slowly, and I invest slowly. As I said LINK isn't about to moon, I am in no rush since I already hold 200k. Imagine if you bought ETH for 10 USD instead of 6 USD, would you be kicking yourself right now?

>>4804106

I agree, during the whole 'operation dragonslayer' is when I decided to be a tripfag, it's unfortunate that today's /biz/ you need to be a tripfag to get reasonable discourse. I still love /biz/ but there's a lot more 'noise' then there was before. The memes are still good though.

>>4803005

>price singularity

anon this phrase gave me a giant, life-threatening erection, you should write PR for coins, seriously

will you please read me bedtime stories about my LINK mooning

>>4804048
"Why didn't I buy BTC back in 2011 again? What was my reason? Fucksake I'm a fool. I'll never let that oppurtunity pass me again."

>insert Ethereum here

"Why didn't I buy LINK back in 2017 again? What was my reason? Fucksake I'm a fool. I'll never let that oppurtunity pass me again."

Fixed it

>>4804146

You can also check the binance buy/sell walls, that's why I posted before I made the order.

>>4804056


Sold some at 2805, was waiting for 2200. I just bought in at 2445 for 11200 LINK.

Sometimes giving into the fomo feels good lol. We're all gonna make it.

>>4803988
Thanks, I'm reading through the threads now. I have a little over 15K LINK, hope it will be enough for me to be comfy.

Also, one more question, what do you make of this LINK node pool that is supposedly coming soon? Legit? https://twitter.com/linkpoolio

>>4803686
what are the big three?

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Link?

>>4803109

Obvs use dennis from always sunny

Assblaster you have a face now

>>4801212
Assblaster. T.me/link_marines we want to speak with you for a few minutes if you have the time.

>>4804184
I'll admit I am merely a shill, but this AssBlaster guy gives me a warm glow in the lower dantian

>>4804149

Dude just read the earlier threads you linked to.

What you are doing is valuable and noble and you are going to really help a few anons who were once like you. I'm weirdly convinced your're not larping. Just be super careful not to slip up and post any identifiable details, all these threads will be saved and archived, and the combined autism of 4chan is truly scary when it is mobilized (see HWNDU for details).

Godspeed brother.

Where are you all holding? I've got mine all in binance, should I be scared?

>>4804149
what are your thoughts regarding cindicator and other predictive market platforms? it seems like there's some sort of dark cloud looming over all of them. something to do with the legality of their tokens? i'd appreciate any insight.

>>4803884
THIS

I have 9989 LINKs bros, almost to that sweet sweet 10k. I want to fucking make it!

>>4801212
I recognize that tripcode.

>>4803109
With your analysis and intel you offer to the fight, you would certainly have a place in the LINK Marine Frontline Command. Nice work Captain Dan.

>>4803406
Nice Choice

>>4803005
>If a) you have over 10K LINK, and b) nothing bad happens to Sergey, you will never *have* to work again in your life.
holy shit I have 10300 link

>>4803686
>XMR

I have quite a few friends buying XMR at the moment. What do you think of it?

I have £3000 to invest. What should i buy?

>>4804197

I'm very excited by this. Again I haven't worked with Sergey directly, and this may start to sound like borderline idolisation, which depending on your point of view might make me more/less credible in your eyes, but he's starting to have very much the reputation of someone who always has something else up his sleeve, by this I mean that he seems to have a very healthy balance of ideas and ambition. Basically if LINK succeeds, (I really hate this buzzword but unfortunately it's the only appropriate term) expect a lot of innovations. I'm going to leave at that because I don't want to come off like I'm hyping LINK.

>>4804320

I agree, thanks for the advice brother.

>>4804345

Personal opinion is that most of these platforms operate on extremely flimsy platforms and will never be able to deliver on their promises. Invest at your own risk.

Going to be up another hour, thinking of compiling some highlights from this thread and others and post it on the weekend. Keep the questions coming if you have them guys.

>>4801212
>tfw trying to sell my initial investment but binance is being a dick

>>4801534
I remember your post but that was a long time ago

>>4803406
Is 200K Lamboland?

>>4804468
Go meditate on that feeling for the next 30 mins sir

>>4804483

XMR is and always has been one of my favourite coins, unironically. MBH, mine it, buy it, hodl it. I first bought some at 15 USD, sold at 40, now I just accumulate. The best strategy with crypto, in my opinion, is to have a sort of funnel, funnel your gains from riskier ventures into safer holdings. Finally I funnel those gains into my stocks (Galaxy Resources and Aphria are my risky stocks, AMZN, LMT, and DIS are my low risk stocks). Basically continuously operate a funnel, and don't get greedy. With this approach instead of 'cashing out' you 'invest out' and you get gains on every step of the gravy train.

I bought GXY at 0.30 cents and Aph at ~4 CAD.

Will I make it with 50k link or do I need more?

>>4804595

It depends, are your wrists made of iron, or spaghetti?

>>4804522
Colonel Damu who is this character in your post from an earlier thread?

>>4804586
What about zencash? Technology is potentially even better than XMR. As far as I'm aware it is the most secure privacy coin now with secure nodes.

>>4804149

You take care of the sweet info, we'll take care of the memes, friendo

I made you OC because I love you

>>4804586
Were you there for the lithium threads feels like years ago? I got in on ALB and GXY as a result of those.

>>4803686
>Been on 4chan since 2006
>>4247041
>Been on 4chan since 2010
As an iron handed link holder I want to believe you. However, the only reason you are telling us all this is to give back to anons. If we all mean so much to you and considering it's your sole reason for posting numerous times and with multiple threads, why the fuck don't you know how long you've been on this site?

>>4804711

screencap this, potcoin will pump in approx 11 hours, get on it linkies

>>4804586
>gxy resources

I remember that company, invested myself and sold at a huge loss hahah

Also bro stop sharing so much damn info on yourself.. I can now guess your country of origin, and trace your wallets based on your buy orders.

You need to stop with the info lol

>>4804646
What do you see LINK's mcap being after the singularity?

>>4804741
Hmm maybe he meant he's been on /biz since 2010/11. You may have got him there though

AssBlaster, you seem like a good guy and between the evidence of your Nov 8th post, your generally well written posts and the somewhat specific details you're giving, I'm inclined to believe. We also share a similar story in that I was also involved back in 2011 but like you, was young and didn't have much money so when faced with the option to withdraw my few thousand dollars or hold it and risk losing it, well, I just needed that money too much and took it.

Now I make a good salary and can risk losing money on a long hold so I'm holding 175k LINK from the ICO that I don't plan to touch for at least a year.

Having said that, I'm not making any decisions based on your posts, I was planning to hold anyway and will continue to do so. But can you please explain this "under the table" trading? If they aren't buying on Binance and aren't buying from the reserve, where is this coming from? Private seller to private seller? How is that possible on this scale? Is there a way we can identify the transaction IDs?

>>4804741
I'm guessing he started on 4chan since 2006 and got on /biz/ since 2010 but either way it isn't that big of a deal

>>4804646
thoughts on ETP?

>>4804874
Also, how does this under the table trading wind up affecting the price since it isn't on the Binance books?

>>4804929
That was my next question

>>4804704

Indeed I was. I was also there when TTNP happened. I was not a victim but the pink wojaks that day was unprecedented.

>>4804711

Depends on how you qualify 'being on the site', I went on for the first time when I was like 12 and browsed /b/ and shit, but I didn't get really get involved or feel a part of the community until about 2010, hence I didn't invest til 2011. I have nothing to gain shilling to you guys, LINKs 6MM volume is going to be affected by biz.

>>4804834
The singularity will be the day all the news drops, on that day it will hit 1% of crypto market cap literally in a day. That's 30x. Then it will climb to 5%. This is the point at which a lot of you may think I'm deluded, so I strongly recommend you screencap this. (pic related will be me when it happens).

>>4804874
This is actually the single best question anyone has asked me, because this is something that I found out awhile ago when I started working a more important position at my job and it blew my mind. Very few people on /biz/ now this and it's one of the reasons I'm extremely bullish on crypto, virtually every major firm right now interested in crypto is employing what are essentially crypto headhunters. You have to remember that a lot of the whales in any coin are the same people who got rich off btc 3 years ago, these same people then become whales in various other coins they like. As a result there are basically 'lists' of people who have lots of crypto, aren't hiding it, and who also subsequently know other people with lots of crypto. Headhunters manage these networks and take a small commission to ensure firms don't have to buy through exchanges. Lots of crypto is traded in board rooms with lawyers and notaries present and NDAs.

>>4804909
This.

>>4804929
Delayed effect of lower supply. I covered this in my first post.

>>4804586
>The best strategy with crypto, in my opinion, is to have a sort of funnel, funnel your gains from riskier ventures into safer holdings

This is exactly my plan, i want to waterfall all the money i make.

>>4804586
>XMR is and always has been one of my favourite coins, unironically

So good tech, but better coins to buy?

And..>>4804586
>MBH, mine it, buy it, hodl it. I first bought some at 15 USD, sold at 40, now I just accumulate.

MBH?

deluded linkies, your token is tied to eth and that shit WILL be replaced. You better hope you up your tech and build your own system or you're going down with it. Also this was a pump and you're still going below 1000 by january.

>tfw only 2000 LINK
Will I still be rich?

>>4805049

The >this was intended for >>4804905
I am unconvinced on ETP.

>>4805077

Investing in the tech will almost always (almost, being key, BTC is an exception) yield better returns in the long run. So if you have the patience buy the tech.

MBH is an acronym for mine it, buy it, hold it.

>>4805096

>pic related

>>4805142

Only if you live in South America or Africa

>>4805167
>Investing in the tech will almost always (almost, being key, BTC is an exception) yield better returns in the long run. So if you have the patience buy the tech.
>MBH is an acronym for mine it, buy it, hold it.

Got you, thanks.

>>4805049
>I have nothing to gain shilling to you guys
Neither do people larping as virgins or chads but it boogles my mind that people still do it. I just don't like a big tease. I hope you're telling the truth anon, we'll all be much richer for it. Good luck.

>>4805142
Let's have lunch in Tokyo sometime.

>>4805167
What about Lisk? basically asking you what you think of my portfolio...

>>4805049
capped
I hope for us all you aren't LARPing, I honestly believe we're all gonna make it brah.

>>4804522
Honestly, I will be happy with 50k from my 5k LINK but this guy is talking about never having to work again with 10k. Meaning my 5k is going to get half a million? wutt? I am guessing over 2+years but still.

So you think LINKs mc will exceed that of ripples? Also, when do you think the singularity will happen? Mid 2018?

>>4805445
XRP will be destroyed.

>>4805049
Appreciate your answer, blaster of asses, it makes sense.

Why are you bullish about that though? Isn't it bad that backroom deals are taking away buying pressure from the open markets?

>>4804711
I NEED THE TRUTH

>>4805167
Only have 5k :(
But I do live in south america:D
But on the most expensive south american country D:

>>4805167
>>4805485
>XRP will be destroyed.

Why?

Do you guys think Binance's outages today were from the large amount of LINK being purchased?

>>4801212
I appreciate your tip anon, I just want to understand a few things.
I remember you saying they bought privately from large holders. There are only a handful of non-dev, non-exchange wallets holding a million plus with none over 10 million. Roughly how many people did they buy from and how did they get in contact?
>>4801534
How are they currently storing this huge amount of LINK? 100MM seems to be a bit much. There would be noticeable restructuring in token holders.

Lastly, you were saying that these private sellers would replenish their stacks from open market, but that would mean they suffer the low liquidity themselves and would be right now buying back at a premium. Is this accurate?

>>4805167
/biz/ didn't exist in 2010...

>>4805606
LINK can do what Ripple does plus many, many other things.

Take SWIFT data, put it into Chainlink which then puts it onto Ethereum which will be fast in the future with plasma/sharding and bam, Ripple's use case is blown out.

>>4805648
It's from IOTA

>>4805677
He covered that they use headhunters to buy direct from large crypto holders.

We need Link wallet bro in here to do some wallet analysis and track this privately traded LINK

>>4805690
>which then puts it onto Ethereum
what if cryptodoggies comes out and this suddenly takes 5 hours

>>4805743
>which will be fast in the future with plasma/sharding

You do know plasma will do 1 million transactions per second +, right?

>>4804711
>>4804741
>>4804867
>>4804905
>>4805490
This >>4805688 is a pretty fucking good point.

>>4803198
>comrade
communists have no place among LINK marines, soldier

>>4805385

I could be wrong, but I'm not LARPing. That being said I'm pretty damn confident and if luck is a real thing, I'd say I'm pretty damn lucky too.

>>4805406

$20 is my conservative estimate for LINK, 200k is enough to never have to work if you're smart about it and pick the right place to live. Also when I say work I mean do a 9-5 job you hate, so you'd probably need to still do something, you'll just be very flexible in what you do. In the end it's all about having options.

>>4805445

Yes. Not only because I think the tech is better, but also because of the fundamentals. Ripple is a very liquid coin, it is literally designed to be transacted. A lot of people don't realise that bitcoins shitty transaction times and high fees actually increases the nominal value of bitcoin as less of it is moved. The value of an asset operating as a commodity is proportional (someone probably has an equation for it) to the purchasing power it represents (i.e. the collective value of goods it is being collectively used to transact for) AS WELL AS the speed through which it can flow through this network, you could run the entire economy using 1 USD if you could perfectly transact it at light speed (I exaggerate to make my point), whereas LINK has been designed from the bottom up to encourage holding for node operation, as a result LINK will vastly exceed Ripple in market cap.

>>4805487
It's good because: a) if you're smart you have a larger window of opportunity as investment between developments and price impacts, since the big movers will move in private before it gets priced in on markets. b) it in general shows that the banks and institutions are interested in cryptos by an entire factor more than we see, the fact that there's an entire fledgling industry dedicated to the efficient accumulation of crypto says a lot.

>>4805490
This was addressed a few posts back

>>4805688
/g/ did, and in general I just got more active then. As opposed to occassional /b/ lurker.

>>4805736
Headhunt over 100 wallets whose owners are anonymous?
Again 100MM is too much to headhunt for and too much to hold without being noticed (unless split across 100s of address as there aren't even 100 address that hold 1+ million). I regularly check the wallets myself and sadly I think this claim is suspicious.

>>4805743
Initial ChainLinks will be developed for Bitcoin, ETthereum, and HyperLedger.

It would be foolish of the team to ignore developing a ChainLink for a significantly better/faster/more utilized blockchain that may develop in the future.

ChainLink is the skeleton key

>>4805813

Would a major bitcoin correction have any impact on link's implementation? I would guess no, but idk

>>4805688
>>4805813
I can vouch for OP's trip being used as far back as 2010 on /g/, he's also a sportsfag.

>>4805869
***
sorry TownCrier ChainLink, not HyperLedger

via https://medium.com/@jonnyhuxtable/smartcontract-test-net-and-technology-evaluation-b5023d750f6f

Everything has been seeing green for weeks, aths being broken and set left right and center, when link finally sees some green it's not just the market it's HUUR THE BIG BANKS ARE BUYING

Dumb fuck bag holders

>>4805953

>3x ICO
>Bagholders

>>4805999
>No one bought at 6k sats to 11k sats
>ico buyers aren't desperate to see the ath once again instead of holding onto a bleeding token
Lol okay

>>4801534
you're full of shit. get help.

>>4804741
he's been on 4chan since 06, /biz/ since 2010 where he found out about crypto that he got into in 2011

>>4805869

Steve also confirmed in gitter that chainlink can be adapted to any blockchain by anyone.

>>4805813
how far out do you see LINK at $20? Can you give an estimate for eoy 2018? Thank you sir.

>>4803005
Screencap making a new personal email address Ken.shamrock48@gmail.com, if you need 10k link to never work again I will eat cow cock and fuck two gay dudes live while singing the national anthem.

>>4805677

Again there are networks of large crypto holders. Consider this, imagine you actually did make millions of LINK, like 10MM plus, you might think to yourself 'oh I'd quit working and do whatever I wanted' but the truth is you'd find you're completely hooked on crypto. Your hooked on the hunt, the rush, the memes, everything about the community. What you'd actually do is use that money to make your trading and accumulation far more efficient. Some of these people accumulate across hundreds of wallets, they get citizenships in tax havens, they change their entire life to be MORE involved in crypto, not less. Once you have 10MM is when the fun really starts, you may think to yourself you'd buy 3 lambos, but more often than not you'll end up with 3 secure terminals in a penthouse in hong kong and several secretaries helping you manage all these assets. You'll have proxy channels and dummy accounts to buy off exchanges, you'll participate in ICOs constantly. I know 'whales are accumulating' is usually a last ditch meme by pajeets to get you to take their bags, but the meme itself comes from a place of truth. Think about how your life would actually be if you had millions of dollars from crypto and you realise how much more fun trading crypto would be. Additionally most of these people are early adopters so they really see the future of crypto, they want to cement an important role in it, as long as there's a demand (and of course there is, firms don't want to buy off exchanges) people will fill that demand. I envy these people, imagine have millions to trade crypto with, whilst increasingly meeting more and more important people.

>>4805857

Be more imaginative, think about what one slightly obsessive person, even from this thread, would achieve with 40MM USD and knowledge that there's a demand for this kind of stuff. Sometimes these people buy into ICOs, sometimes these people are contracted to accumulate with dummy accounts etc.

Less than 7% of circulating supply has been traded yet this larper says one person bought up 100m tokens in the last few weeks?

>>4801212
I made this for you OP so you can use it to call upon us linkies on your next update

>>4805813
Ah ok, thanks. 100k would be more than enough to set me up with 10 Antminers and to put them in a data centre. I would even have enough left for a deposit on a house and maybe a second property to rent out. Hmm, Starting a job in the Navy soon (at 34) so I might hold off on the house and keep it in Monero or something and stick to just the miners. Maybe a basic car to get me about. Which is basically all I want/need right now. Just passed my test and I kind of took a gamble and invested in crypto with the saving I had for my car. Almost doubled my money in a month and a half so I guess it paid off. This LINK prediction could indeed be life-changing for me. If not then oh well. At least I am not a fat neet anymore and have the Navy and training as an Engineer and NCO to look forward to. Just need a car... and miners!

True or not, cheers for this. You write a nice story or tell a good tale. Propper good bedtime reading!

>>4806061

I mean, I'm a small fry in the big picture and even I had 10 wallets ready to go with exactly 7 ETH each in them to rapid fire off for the ICO. Got most of them in.

Can only imagine the convoluted setups people with millions have.

>>4805648
post more Vjuice, especially wearing a bikini

>>4806189

>>4805813
>$20
Only $20? Considering how high BTC and ETH are gonna be? Some ‘Bitcoin Futures’ guy on Bloomberg earlier was predicting ETH will be 5k by EOY 2018. That was admittedly an optimistic estimate, but still it’s very likely it will be at least $1k by then. What’s stopping LINK from reaching $100?

>>4806189
more

>>4806224
The fact it's a fee token and node operators only receive 1/312th of that fee
Also the fact 65% of fhe supply is waiting to be given to big users of the chainlink network, destroying the "huur they will be buying my bags off binance" bullshit

>>4806224
He said 'conservative'.
>>4806284
Smaller businesses will still want nodes, even other tokens and coins may want them. Not to mention any dinosaurs who missed the boat in big business (unlikely but possible).

>>4806029
Learn to punctuate shitskin

>>4806144

Exactly. Now just imagine someone hypothetically gave you 50MM USD to start an accumulation business (this field is basically so new there's no real word for it yet) and you know there's only a narrow window (think a couple of years) where you can do this legally, but not only will you profit off it, you will meet important people and build a reputation.

Imagine how much fun you'd have picking out a flat in Hong Kong, setting up secure terminals, proxies, building networks of dummy accounts, researching ICOs etc. There are two ways of doing it, the gamblers identify ICOs and buy in bulk using dozens of dummy accounts, then further break these down into batches of wallets.The others do it on a per order basis (thus only spending money when the demand has been made, so flat rate of profit, but no risk) and use dummy accounts across exchanges. They then sell, and often when they do sell they simply sell a stack of private keys, each of which gets verified in front of the lawyers. This is why I said it would be several weeks before the company I work for could execute the purchase, and a further several weeks until it would impact the exchanges. Considering the crypto market is unregulated it could even be possible for some of these people to engage in price suppression, though that becomes exponentially more difficult as volume increases. Still it's an amazing job to have for any cryptofag.

>>4806224
Conservative estimate. I'm not trying to shill LINK, just have a reasonable discussion about it.

>>4806284
At the end of the day it's simple arithmetic, there is only so much supply, and the value of the combined market will be divided by the supply. You underestimate how many big players there will be. Token value will not be determined by fee generation only, if the market keeps growing then token supply will become more limited. Remember this is a world where a social network can be worth billions before it even turns a profit, because of future growth.

Well, my autism got the best of me, and best I can say, OP is truthful about being an old-ish fag, and he's kept his LARP, if it is one, pretty consistent over time, so take that as you will, I choose to believe him.
Just google his trip and you'll see.

>>4806284
>the fact 65% of the supply is waiting to be given to big users
But isn’t that just another reason for it to increase in price? As it’s essentially cutting the market supply since those big businesses will be guaranteed to hodl? Isn’t that what AB is saying here? >>4801534

>>4806415

Damn, I can't wait to make it...
There's a whole other world out there waiting for me.

>>4803005
>If a) you have over 10K LINK, and b) nothing bad happens to Sergey, you will never *have* to work again in your life.

>>4805813
>200k is enough to never have to work

starting to have doubts here

>>4806113
UNDERATED OC Meme and idea. Outstanding Marine.

>>4806421
>>4806461

ATTENTION ANONS: I just decided to google my tripfag to see what would come up, because I made it a long time ago I never realised how week it was and that it's basically already in a dictionary crack of 4chan tripcodes, so I am changing it to avoid someone in the future spoofing me.

This is my new tripcode.


Also to continue contributing to the thread, I will mention a use case of LINK that I know a lot of people are excited about. Don't see it mentioned much so I don't know how aware you are of it:

There are a lot of regulatory loopholes to jump through, but there is long term hopes that one day ChainLINK will be used to allow trading of securities and bonds across the blockchain. Securities/bonds can be issued in token form and ChainLINK will be used to determine interest rates/dividends etc. Again a lot of loopholes, but exciting stuff nonetheless.

>>4806523

Notice the emphasis on *have* to work, notice that I then elaborated saying one would need to be careful in choosing where they'd live and their lifestyle. But considering inflation, you're right, it would probably only last 10 years.

>>4806523
Depending on where you live this is true though to an extent. With a float of 200k usd where I am in Canada I could buy a couple rentals and just work for fun and extra cash here and there.

>>4806631
>creates an insecure tripcode after saying his last tripcode was insecure despite being a secure trip that was cracked
You just activated my almonds.

>>4806631
Can you please confirm this by replying with your original tripcode? Thanks.

>>4806638

$200k is pretty much the point where I quit my job, put $20k of that down on a 3-4br house that I rent the extra rooms in and spend my time developing additional revenue streams.

>>4806680
Is this better?

>>4806705
Just look at my ID?

>>4806815

>>4806815

Oh yeah, duh. My b.

>>4806815

$20 is your conservative estimate. What's your optimistic one. If LINK is used as the defacto standard oracle network for trading of stocks and bonds. What's LINK worth in 5 years....10?

>>4806815
in the scenarios where LINK doesn't pan out, what do you think the odds are that there would be the "pop" you describe, in order to sell early gains to reduce our initial investment in order to reduce risk?

>>4806894

Consider the fact that $5T gets moved per year via SWIFT alone and some pretty ridiculous price predictions start to develop. A $100-500B MC ($100-500 LINK) is not out of the question if it becomes a world standard.

>>4807100
what will happen when they run out of links

>>4807136
Uh what? LINK isn't consumed, it's just exchanged. IT doesn't run out, there's always 1B.

>>4807100

This is astrology at this point. We're talking 5 years into the future. Who knows what's gonna happen in the next month in crypto, let alone years from now.

Just HODL your LINK. Anyone getting in now won't need to worry about losing money come next year.

>>4807180
My man!

>>4807151
then why the hell is it worth so dang much

>>4807180

Oh yeah, I don't plan on that happening, I'm just saying if it really takes off, that's within the realm of possibility.

I just need it to go to $1-5 and I'm set, so yeah, I'm not touching shit until it hits that which it will do easily IMO.

>>4806894

If I had to guess, then given a best case scenario where LINK delivers on it's promises I would expect LINK to be worth 5-10% (lets say 7% for arguments sake) of the entire crypto market cap by 2020. Punching in some numbers:

Market cap of crypto in 2020 = 1.5 trillion USD
Market cap of LINK = 105 billion USD
Price per LINK = 105 USD

It's important to remember that the entire market cap of crypto will increase between now hence a market cap of 105 billion USD for LINK is very doable. Consider how many people would have believed you a year ago if you said Ripple would have a 10 billion USD market cap.

>>4807151

Exactly, but the key about LINK is it's designed to have low fluidity (I can't remember the technical word, it's 3 am for me), in other words LINK inherently encourages extended periods of staking, so there will be a high cost barrier to establish competing nodes, this will subsequently drive the price up. Compare to ripple which is designed to be transacted constantly, therefore does not encourage as high a price (the faster you can transact a currency/token, the higher its utility is per token, the less valuable it is).

>>4807245
Gold isn't consumed either, it just changes forms...

>>4804711
FUCKING CHECKED. GTFO Dennis, we know you never made shit in that stupid show.

>>4807260
Isn't Crypto supposed to have a market cap of like 3 Trillion by 2020?

>>4807260
>>4807316
unless you think crypto is a bubble...

>>4807358
In the very same page of the WEF article that mentions like it says 10% of the world's wealth will be on the blockchain by 2025 which would actually be 8 Trillion.

>>4807398
can you link it?

I was already comfy af holding my LINK but after this thread I'm previously unmatched levels of comfort. My comfy scanner just broke.

So thanks for that, mystery ass man, I appreciate it even if it is all an elaborate larp. Going to bed, I look forward to more threads.

Are there any announcements due out or is the pump being driven by above private purchasing?

>>4807260
I can't wait that long, you stupid nigger. When's it going to be $5?

>>4807260
tfw that would make me 1.5MM.
I could literally be a NEET forever. please sergey, do NOT FAIL US AUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>4807461

Sergey announcement and SWIFT PoC results both this month. Bittrex is confirmed to be reviewing it too, they tweeted about the dev wallet transfer rumor. So that could potentially come this month as well (or never)

>>4807477
Where is that post from?

Might consider buying more link with my next paycheque or divesting my stocks into this.

What price do you think it is a good buy up to?

Might have to pay my visa minimum for a month or two. ha!

>>4807427
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf

A great read btw OP, if its true or not, or just in part.

>>4807526
Original pic is a meme, I just photoshopped Sergey into it, dingus.

>>4807260
Velocity of money

>>4807514
>they tweeted about the dev wallet transfer rumor
Link? I couldn't find anything on their page..

>>4807542
WHAT THE FUCKKKK
ARE YOU FUCKING SHITTING ME?
>checks report date
>September 2015

Will this piece of shit go up overnight, or will we wake up to a dumped price? Stupid nigger

>>4807607

anon all of this has been public record for the entirety we've been talking about link and you've been saying we're deluded. did you not dyor?

>>4807597
https://twitter.com/BittrexExchange/status/934126411257823232

>As part of the review process

So they confirmed they're reviewing it, they just say not to read into it and assume it'll be listed.

>>4807607
It's like people don't pay attention.

>>4807526
retarded brainlet

>>4807647
>>4807669
i dont know how i missed that

>>4807665
Fuck Bittrex, I want Cuckbase to add it.

>>4807665

Also notice ENG was another in that test wallet and that just got listed...

>>4807607
Real. Wow.

>>4807607
This is old news no?
You want some more brainlet?
Sergey Nazarov and Satoshi Nakamoto both have S.N. initials. Sergey's website smartcontract.com have been registered under his name since 2008 a couple of day before Bitcoin whitepaper was released. Google it.

>>4801534
Holy shit this is completely retarded
LINK confirmed for no support
SELL SELL SELL
IT'S ALREADY OVER
IT ALWAYS WAS OVER

>>4804647
Hey man missed the post before, I dunno its from 40k I think

Hey OP i remember your old threads, thanks for the heads up.
Interested in your opinion on Wanchain and Elastos. WAN is like a more comprehensive ripple but built on ethereum with monero like privacy and multi blockchain interoperability. Would probably combine well with LINK desu.
Elastos is a decentralized internet OS piggybacking on the BTC blockchain created by the NEO team and incorporating neo smart contracts. You should take a deep look into both imo lad.

>>4807665
Oh nice, thanks anon.
*quietly maxes out credit card*

>>4807724
S is also the 19th letter in the alphabet AND the number of shits I've taken in the last month.

Strangely, each one of those shits were in a toilet. Sergey was also next to toilets at SIBOS.

$19 LINK confirmed by EoY.

>>4803686
I saw your original post,fuck i hoped for it to drop to 195 again fuck man, missed out on Some nice gains, fuuuuu

>>4807787
I've already taken a loan out against my 401K for more LINK...

>>4804647

Sooo why is it dumping now if it’s genuine accumulation?

>>4807958
Every alt is dumping you dumbass. Check blockfolio.

>>4807958
Because bots drove the price up and, unlike /biz/, intelligent investors try to buy low.

>>4807958
This is the aftereffect of their accumulation(if true), and bagholders are dropping their bags, as we all expected, plus bitcoin is pumping after being dormant for a while.

>>4802606
a 10 cent difference at this point is 25~33% value
thats the difference between 750k + nice house or just the 750k

>>4807622
I want it to dump back to .16 or so long enough for me to accumulate, then skyrocket again. Same story as always, really.

>>4808060
yfw it actually does go up to 100 USD per LINK and you feel like a complete dickhead for wanting to buy .10 lower

>>4807260
I take it back mate, read your old threads. Good stuff

>>4805572
CHILE???

>>4808134
>MFW it does go up to 100 USD after I bought .10 lower
I'm trading lunch money, I need this shit.

>>4807958
Sorry, it was me. It's so illiquid I dropped the price by 200 sats with a 100k sell on both BTC and ETH pairs. I had to de-risk after being almost all in since ICO.
It's been painful. I used to margin trade with IOTA being one of my favourite plays, can't believe I missed that.

>>4808235
That's what I said when I sold my 100BTC at $20 each.

>>4808235
Touché.
I wouldn't mind a correction either, need to scoop some more up on payday. Let's just hope we don't end up like >>4808275

>>4808295
>>4808275
>>4808264
>>4808235
>>4808221
>>4808141

Guys, I just got quads twice in like 6 hours...

>>4808308

See: my ID in that post, then look up to see my quads, then see my quads here: >>4802222

>>4804001
San Francisco

>>4808134
Why do robbers in 90s shows always put a screwdriver to stereo systems?

What are they trying to steal?

It looks more like a fomoing retard pump to me.

>>4808342
Shit son, we've got meme magic on our side, we cannot lose.
>>4808364
That's Seinfeld.

>>4804001
https://officesnapshots.com/2016/03/15/coinbase-offices-san-francisco/

Do what you must I've never used that normie scum exchange

>>4808342
Do you think the price could rise to $1 and above before May 2018? Also, do you know anything about LINK getting listed on bittrex?

>>4808393
Holy shit she's ugly, avoid that skank

>>4808408

I would be extremely surprised if the price is below $3 in May 2018.

I don't know anymore than /biz/ collectively does.

>>4804149
good memes? I assure you we have no idea what you're talking about...

>>4808393
But why is he putting a screwdriver to the stereo?

Is he trying to sabotage it or does he have a fetish for putting screwdrivers in stereos?

Usually the strangest coin I never expect to succeed moons so maybe link will work out.

>>4808503
Maybe will work oout? Have you read the whitepaper brainlet? Buy at least 1k and just HODL.

>>4808496
I have no clue, fampai, some anon requested I shoop Sergey's head onto that picture, so I whiped it up in 3 minutes, I never really watched Seinfeld.

>>4808478
>I would be extremely surprised if the price is below $3 in May 2018.
Why? Are annoucnements to be expected by then?

>>4808520
>Buy at least 1k
Man, I'm at 256. I just want to get to 512 and feel marginally comfy.

>>4804207
Bitcoin won't remain a part of the trifecta unless it gets fixed.

>>4808537
OP isn't from the future, nigger, he just has some inside info that gives him faith in the project.

how many links do i need to just retire with a nice home and internet connection next to a costco its all i really want :(

>>4808627

40k LINK, after taxes.

>>4808627
idk, a lot probably. I wouldn't say it'd be more than 100 USD in 5 years. But who the fck knows with crypto. Could be the next big thing, may flop. Might as well buy some when it's cheap while you can.

if everything you said is true...why is the price dropping?

>>4808685
Just realized you're back on your old trip, you dingus.

>>4807768
No worries, I'm harvesting Avatars for a new line of OCM's. Stockpiling for those milestones.

>>4807837
Sweet. Thanx.

any hints on the companies accumulating

>>4808480
This one's pretty good!

>>4808730

Sorry I had to do that to prove my double quads.

>>4808729

Because obviously some people saw the price go up and have decided to sell? Also bitcoin is rallying, when bitcoin rallies it sucks alt money in like a black hole. Besides did you expect that after today Link would go up forever?

>>4808918
How often will you be making these threads?
This was really enjoyable to read through, keep us up to date opie, and use your non-compromised tripcode :).

>>4808918
Are you worried at all anout blockchains building their own oracles?

>>4808918
Give a shred of proof of some of the claims you made.... something that shows you work for a blockchain company.

>>4809004

I don't need to prove anything to you. I don't work for a blockchain company, I work for a company involved in datastreaming. I can't go into more detail than that. I will continue to post predictions when I can, the accuracy of those predictions should be the basis of my credibility.

>>4809066
Proof you're involved with datastreaming and not a NEET roleplay who's obsessed with Crypto.

>>4809079
why the fuck would he?
Just read his goddamned posts. Even if hes an autistic NEET larper hes onto something

Link will fall back to 22 cents r-right?

>>4809130
Hi second acc

>>4809004
you must have missed some of his earlier threads. Maybe it's all coincidence, but I'm willing to gamble money if it means creating wealth for myself. I have an okay paying day-job, and I don't have any kids. Losing a few hundred isn't going to mess with my finances at all. Even thousands. But I can't say I'm ready to make that jump.

>>4801212
I believe OP. I don't have anymore fiat to buy LINK or anything, but everything he said since Nov 8th has been true and logical.

Thanks OP. I will remember this when CL succeeds

>>4809445
how do you search his earlier threads?

>>4809495
He makes links to them every time. here is one
https://yuki.la/biz/4246712

>>4801212
Will it drop again to 2k ?

Fucking damn... even if, hypothetically, chain link was a shitty project the sheer amount of force behind this JUST in the community is enough to take it moon bound. All of you could literally wash trade this shit up several dollars. Think I'm convinced at this point to buy a position.

>>4801534
Thanks dude, listened and went all in

>>4809580
Each passing day more of us become connected, we will be the Oracles™

>>4809617
Always loved the history of communication because it defined the victors of war. Human society tends to go through waves of centralization and decentralization based on the advantages during those periods. As we are entering a decentralized phase again there is an absolute need for trusted data sources. Like the assblaster this is either out a couple thousand or stratosphere project.

>>4809130
He's just a delusional bag holder with way too much time on his hands
If he actually had information worth shit he wouldn't be attention whoring on 4chan, just make a few short posts and forget about it.

Don't be naive

>>4805813
when do you see it reaching this $20?

>>4808548
do you work in audio or something? why do you have to buy in multiples of 256 lool

Why do you only have 200k links then? If this is going to moon hard, wouldn't you go all in?

>>4810084
Are you stupid?

>>4810110
stay in your lane. wasn't talking to you ugly fag

>>4810142
>wasn't talking to you ugly fag
So? You're on a public imageboard, not a private phonecall with OP. Fuck off, faggot.

>>4810084
why would he go all in when he stands to make 4 million USD based on his conservative price estimate? he is almost positive in will moon, but it COULD crash, which seems like a good reason to not go all in. You are a stinky boy.

>>4810084

Opportunity costs. Same reason I only moved 0.4 BTC in today, and kept 10+ btc in long positions on bitmex. Same reason I hold 50% of my position in XMR which went up 30% today.

I am not some sort of oracle that knows precisely when LINK will moon. Neither did I claim LINK is guaranteed to moon. I simply gave you guys access to the insider info I was given access to. I made a nice profit off it, and I will slowly divest my earnings into LINK, but it is by no means risk free. Also as I established, LINK has a binary outcome, either it fails, and I lose 50k USD (not the end of the world) or it succeeds and my 200k is worth 4 million+. By my estimates this is a good risk/reward ration, especially considering I can make money off other coins should LINK fail.

>>4803686
>Been on 4chan since I was 14 (2006)
and yet you're still a tripfag

And all this while I wait to get that fucking 300€ restriction got removed at my blockchain account. Fml

>>4810019
Jokes on you faggot, I'm buying in multiples of 128! Because that's the size of my first stack and it makes the math easier.

>>4810402
nice ha brilliant idea can can can send me. good luck and to the moon! correct me can i buy in 128 multiple as well but i don't want to steal your idea you can have all the credit ill see you on the other side lambo city

>>4810246
makes sense. man I believe you.

thanks for your contribution. post more on your free time...this is really helpful to put things in perspective

>>4810503
of course it makes sense you retard, and you really needed him to answer that?

While I am invested in Link, I am still a crypto noob. Where would you suggest storing my Link? Should I just make the jump and get a ledger? Does a ledger even work for Link? I'm going to bed, but I'll check responses in the morning.

night everyone

>>4810558
lalala :)

>>4810565
MyEtherWallet paper wallet.

killer thread OP.

oc for the occasion

>>4810565
Get a ledger brush.
Order from real ledger site.
Why?
>selling fakes

>>4811138
kek'd & saved

>>4801212
im so new I didn't know what a tripfag was till googling it right now

but I was able to see the value in link and am sitting on a healthy stack. Will definitely buy more if it ever goes back to the teens, otherwise will use REQ or XLM gains to buy more down the road.

Your evidence is pretty much too good to ignore... maybe I'm just gullible tho but fuck yea man this is why I'm on Biz

>>4810565
Google how to secure your wallets. There should be multiple articles telling you different strategies and the pros/cons of each.
My links are sleeping comfy on a ledger ns and waiting for the day where one of them would buy me a meal.

>>4811211
Are you talking about Nano Ledger S? I also need to get my LINK off the exchange asap. I would probably kill myself if binance got mt. gox'd

>>4801212
>Notice how this pump started with no real news?

Link dumped for no real reason either.
Don't try to make sense of this. Just look at the merits and stick to that.

>>4810246
assblaster you going to bed?

im on west coast so should too but ive really enjoyed this thread. convinced me to sell my etp and hold bitcoin too while it pumps right now, and sleep extra comfy knowing I have enough Link to make ~1M USD in 2020.

>>4807136
You pretty much can't.
Link is divisible to 18 decimal places.
Link could be worth trillions a pop, and you'd still be able to pay cents worth of Link.

>>4812565

but I think it is curious how sergey chose a billion coins. I myself made up the argument that he would literally need that many it would be implemented so far and wide but that was just trying to fomo.

It feels like sergey wants to take this company to a level no other coin has ambitions to reach .

For the people thinking link cant be bigger than eth. Think again. Pic related fuckers.

>>4812701
Honestly, the amount of coins is pretty inconsequential. The only thing that matters is market cap.

But yes, this immense amount (1B) does indicate the ambition of the project.

And it's not far-fetched at all either.
If Chainlink does become THE mainstream smart contract solution, look the fuck out.

Check the twitter of swift 1 and 2 days ago. your welcome

bros i only had enough to buy 1k

i feel like i missed out on my chance to lambo

what is the most painless way to off myself?

>>4812790
https://twitter.com/swiftcommunity/status/938042847441358848

Am I dreaming?

>>4812903
not sure if I got fudded but I thought the GPI stuff wasn't related to chainlink. It sounds in the same realm though; if swift has success with blockchain for other things, it'll at least open them up more to adopting smart contracts.

but if I was just Fudded and this really is chainlink then the spike to 1$ could happen before the EOY announcement

inb4 Sergey lets us know they hired developers who are starting in January and thats it...

OMG BIZ, SHOULD I BUY MORE? I only have 1200, will it dip?

>>4812943
>inb4 Sergey lets us know they hired developers who are starting in January and thats it...

I'm generally pessimistic myself. Got to stay grounded in reality. This quote is probably accurate. The tweet doesn't mention chainlink in fact it implies that they are just now seriously looking into blockchain.

>>4812903
Is the December results what everyone is getting excited about?

>>4813049
I think so, if you don't believe this "insider" knowledge crap, then people are buying, speculating on what the announcement will be. We all want swift. But we need to be prepared for possibly something less. Just... be awake and online when they make the announcement then you'll know what to do! I'm going to keep holding no matter what, short term capital gains tax is already fucking me. I honestly have faith that the main net launch will moon us even without swift next year.

What are some good places to buy link?

>>4813215
FBI.gov

>>4813215
Only on Binace and etherdelta sadly.

>>4813244
Jeez the binance website is hardly even loading and can't process my registration :/ just sits there, gooood shit