/biz/ - Business & Finance

>Below top 100 coin

t. bagholder

Hmm the market doesn't seem to agree. They seem to think potcoin is more promising ahahaha

deluded linkies

>>4582765
>>4582774
>>4582783
At first they laugh at you
Then they doubt you
Then they get mad at you
Then they submit

>>4582811
Nah we'll just laugh at you forever until you kill yourself. Even then it will still be kind of funny.

>>4582811

You completely destroyed that quote. Anyway, it is survivorship bias. How many dead coins got to the laughing phase and never left it?

LINK has potential but those saying it will be 100 end of next year are the reason LINK holders are called deluded.

$2 eoy $70 by end of 2019.

>>4582821
>being so poor that a 10000 dollar investment being lost would make you kill yourself
Stay poor lel

it has potential

Linkies pls go. Get justed in silience like a proper bag holder.

>>4582811
Then they try to cash out.
Then they kill themselves.

>>4582964
not everyone bought high you idiot

I actually bought link but not as a investment. It already has a working product and I bought link to dedicate to my own API for my business that will be run by a DAO. LINK is useful. end of story bottom line

>>4582987
feeling /comfy/ buying it at under 2000 satoshi

filled my bags today with LINK. I believe it has potential

LOL you realize the team has completely vanished since sibos right?

There will be no more news, mo more appearances.

You got scammed. They took your 32 million and ran. Have fun with Confido 2.0.

>>4583016
why do you seem to be so worried about us? something's wrong?

>>4583016
they did not vanish chainlink is working I am actually using it right now as we speak. Its not any other kind of erc20 look at the code dimwit

>>4582640

>>4583016
>sibios
you do realize sergey reaapeared in a ethereum tech conference two weeks later and fhats where the fat sergey memes come from?

low quality fud right here

LINK has no speculation potential. Why would it ``moon''?

BTC/ETH are useful for speculation and purchasing. LINK is not. LINKies should all just die.

>>4583151
>Why would it ``moon''?
Because it would provide mainstream smart contracts, generating tremendous demand for the token for payment, staking, and speculation purposes.

You dumbass.

>>4582987
LOL so true. Lots of us were scooping up $0.14 and $0.15 Link all day every day.

Thanks impatient noobs

>>4582811
Then you end up bagholding some fat guy's scam coin

I'm as sure about link as I was about eth

>>4583463
ETH was one of the highest valued coins right from the start, meanwhile LINK is nowhere to be seen.

>>4583184
LINK only provides smart contracts. It does not generate demand by existing. It could remain at very low values for years and still be used for provide smart contracts.

What is the sense in purchasing it outside of speculating?

>>4583499
you could say the same thing about eth desu

>>4582950
>10.000 $ in a shitcoin
>"investment"

>>4583463
me to. I develop solidity contracts and I understand LINK I plan on using it and launching a DAO that uses it next month that will get young people pumping coins like mad cuz it is easy for them to use. easier than buying tickets on ticketmaster

>>4583499
>LINK only provides smart contracts.
Link is the token.
"Smartcontract(.com)" is the company, they provide the smart contracts.

>It does not generate demand by existing.
What?
As smart contracts gain mainstream use, the Chainlink network grows, meaning demand for the Link token for payment and staking grows.

I said pretty much this in the post you replied to.

>>4582987
>>4583011
>>4583368
I think you'll find that you all bought high
But it's alright, right anon?
you wouldn't invest more than you could afford to lose, right anon?
right? anon?

>>4582734
No sorry it will look like this. Because it has already too much traction. Too big to fail

>>4583535
I have enough capital to invest in a promising token and not worry. What about you :)

>>4583570
LINK = Smart Contracts. It is part of the company. It is the company's token. Buying proof-of-stake coins is kin to buying stock.
The company could take USD and you could be buying stock.

This is why it is a poor investment. The demand will only grow if it is used but any company could opt to develop an alternative means for creating smart contracts. It is not the only option and it is pure and foolish speculation to believe that it will be adopted as the only option.

LINK is not comparable to proof-of-work coins that have substantially scaled in price.

>>4583675
Then don't buy it.

>>4582994
>It already has a working product

No it doesn't. It had a one-off demo proof of concept.

Is your API accessible over the LINK network already? No, because they don't have a working network yet.

I'm also waiting to make data available to the network. If it were possible I would be doing it already.

Agreed that LINK's use case is extremely valid though.

>>4582734
Imagine if Chainlink wasn't /ourcoin/. That /biz/ had never picked up on it. It was just some irrelevant coin like DigixDAO or Metaverse ETP or Pura. No one had ever made a thread about it. In other words, imagine Chainlink didn't have all the baggage associated with it on this board.

How would you react if you were hearing about it for the first time now? A coin outside the top 100, with industry backing from the likes of SWIFT, only 2 months since ICO, well below ATH, been in development for 4 years, aiming to open up smart contracts to the wider world. The OP says it's not yet listed on any major exchanges and that the team only have to port their code over to Go and are looking to release a working mainnet early next year.

Sounds like a good deal to me. Try and keep a more long-term perspective.

Or just FUD it for fun despite holding it, that's good too

>>4583629
>invest
>promising

>>4583675
Link is the token used for payment by users, and for staking by nodes.
As the network grows, the demand (for payment and staking) will grow.

This isn't very difficult to understand, I have no idea why you're struggling.

>any company could opt to develop an alternative means for creating smart contracts
Ok?
So invest in those.

Fyi, there have been a number of oracle solutions, but Chainlink blows them all out of the water.

>>4583675
“Buy my coin! It was easier to mine a while back, but now it’s harder, meaning it has more value!”

“But I don’t want it.”

“But it’s valuabke! I WORKED FOR IT!”

“Yeah, I see that. It doesn’t do anything though, it’s not leveraged in any tech. There’s no utility other than the value you’ve given it. Unlike that link token, that has leverage, and thus potential value based off its utility in the oracle network.”

PoW is valuable when you’re the first mover. Lmao not when there’s a million of them and they’re value is given because someone worked for it.

People make shit arts and crafts all day, they value. No gonna buy it though because I don’t want it. You’re forgetting about s and d.

Hold a little bit of LINK at least man. Don’t be daft.

>>4583723
none of us have, "smarter money" have invested in ventures such as PayPie and PotCoin

>>4582734

>>4582734
Eventually people will realize though that someone coming up with a crypto innovation is not a reason to start paying into his pyramid scheme and instead just quietly acknoledge it like any other innovation.

>>4583831
Ah yes, I see. Well, we might not be in top 100 anymore, but I don't think any LINK holder honestly cares anon.

The only thing we care about is living, rent free, in your head.

>>4583960
that's the most disgusting pepe i have seen

Fuck you autistic linkfags, at least bitbeaners had juicy memes

>>4584145
>Fuck you autistic linkfags, at least bitbeaners had juicy memes
Well, go ahead then, make new memes anon. You seem kind of obsessed with LINK anyways, why not channel some of that energy into something productive?

>>4584245
Did you guys have the TV show The Weakest Link in the US?

>>4584905
Americans always rip off UK telly

>>4583757
you are a liar and a idiot

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/79ymy4/chainlink_how_to_start_a_chainlink_node/

you're a bunch of morons, they got their 32 million, now they're just looking for the best way to exit scam. they were partnered with confido for gods sake, joost is part of the same group.

>>4585070
source? thanks.

>>4585070
>they were partnered with confido for gods sake
lmao no they weren't

Confido said they were going to use Link, that's it.

>>4585070
>I'm gonna use Joe's car wash
>hurr we partners and shit

>>4585070
Shut up, idiot.

>>4584905
Not from the US, and I also don't know the show.

>>4585474
Are you from the UK?

"You are the weakest link. Goodbye."

How old are you?

>>4585567
Also not UK. 26.

>>4583090
That wasn't sergey you faggot, that was a fat lookalike. JOOSTED LINKIES

>>4582811
IF by some miracle goes 3x and BTC stays the same for a year long, you will only catchup the missed gains