/biz/ - Business & Finance

0.5 links

>>4363777
Timeline is important.

Make it by EOY next year? 20K

By August of next year? 50K.

2 Years from now? 10K

Assuming making it is 1M

>>4363839
I just want enough to never work again comfortably. Only got ~1K atm, need to scrape together some more

>>4363777
LINK circ supply 350M
ETH circ supply approx 100M
If LINK were to reach ETHs marketcap now it would be worth about $85

>>4363777
0

>>4363887
I'm sorry but it won't moon hard enough to make you retire on 1K. It will make you enough to get on the next moon mission though and really make it.

I cant wait until SWIFT shit actually starts happening and the NOLINKs all neck themselves

Realistically 1k for a wagecucks 1 year salary. 20k lambo and 50k+ you are a millionaire. Screen cap this niggers

I would say 50k, and we will end up with $5-10 price within 6 mo's. That gives you $250-$500k. With that money make your final pie chart and hold long for crypto going mainstream. End up with $10-$50 mill mill.

>>4363939
I hope another opportunity as promising as Link comes along. If this is a pretty set boat, I wanna pump a fuck ton more into it.

1 ChainLink is 0.1935 dollars at $67,739,700 market cap with 350,000,000 circulating supply
Let's bump up the market cap 16 TIMES
67,739,700 * 16 = 1,052,856,000
So if the market cap went up 16 times, you would gain alot right?
Now the ChainLink team releases the rest of the tokens into partners and into the wild, which is 650,000,000 extra tokens, total 1 BILLION TOKENS. What is 1,052,856,000 divided by 1,000,000,000? 1.05!!!!!!!!!
That means 1 ChainLink would be worth 1.05 DOLLARS
That is not even 10x of your investment

kekkekkekekeke

>>4364048
>I can't into basic math

Here's an instructional guide on what to do with your LINK holdings.

>>4363987
Screencapped.

>>4364091
Accurate af

>>4364091
big if true

>>4364078
prove it wrong bitch

ok linkers i have tried to read about it but couldnt find anything usefull
what PURPOSE does he chainlink token serve
it is not needed the network as far as i have read
for me it looks just like shares of a company idk

>>4364048
The maximum that will be released in the next 2 years is 350 million extra LINK for oracle operators and those will be released slowly over time. Even if we assume 650,000,000 circulating supply, at $10 per LINK we would be at $6.5 billion market cap, which is fucking nothing for a project like this when a fucking NEO whose entire purpose is "we ethereum but for china" almost reached that if we assume the full supply. Ripple with 1/3 their supply is over 8 billion and that's a centralized shitcoin.

>>4364169
>Now the ChainLink team releases the rest of the tokens into partners and into the wild, which is 650,000,000 extra tokens, total 1 BILLION TOKENS. What is 1,052,856,000 divided by 1,000,000,000? 1.05!!!!!!!!!
>That means 1 ChainLink would be worth 1.05 DOLLARS
>That is not even 10x of your investment


Ok so 1 billion tokens / 350 mill = 2.85x
When tokens are released into the cirulation we add them into the total market cap meaning that
we multiply 2.85 with this marketcap - 1,052,856,000 x 2.85 = $3,000,639,600
Marketcap / number of tokens - $3,000,639,600 / 1,000,000,000 = $3,0006396 per token

Have you even finished elementary school?

>>4364282
stop posting this you retard

if we reach a stage where those coins make it into circulation the marketcap of LINK will be much more than $1bn

>>4364309
You're right but that's not the point here.
The point is that fudders can't do basic math.

>>4364048
Is this pasta? It sounds like it.

>>4364091
>I have a pajeet-shilled shitcoin, it just dumped on me (Shit I have NO CASH)

I'm poorfag with 10k

everyday I look at price and my head hurts

I went all in into one coin because of the potential this had and I feel the worst seeing how literal shitcoins doing better than Chainlink

This shit ain't logical, it should be at least $1 by now

>>4364341
who needs math when you got link

If you own LINK you will NEVER make it

>1 billion coins
>350 million in circulation
>550 million owned by developer ready to dump
>raised over 100 million dollars for "development", has no developers
>no blockchain
>no company
>github has 1 pajeet who stopped sending commits in June
>fake SWIFT "partnership"

I can't wait for this to pull a DGB so these deluded faggots can stop talking about it

>>4364197
so no of you linkers can answer me this ?
chainlink token is useless confirmed

>>4364546
if this is True i will dump this trash bag. just bought in because of the shills

>>4364589
Read the white paper, idiot

>>4364628
Of course it's not true. Go check their github and see how recently it was updated

>>4364589
Google it big boy

>>4363887
Get 99k more and you’ll be good to go.

>>4364589
Read the whitepaper before asking asking questions about any coin Rajeesh. Its only available in English so you may find it tough to read.

>>4364631
>read the whitepaper meme
im on their website for 15 minutes and i cant find anything that would resemle a whitepaper
all i see is some pajeet github
and a faq

all the website says is what they WANT to do but not how they do it they dont even say why you would need the token

the delusion you links have reached is insane

>>4364649
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/commits/master
there you go, 25 commits since July, from the mentioned pajeet. in a medium sized dev team thats a day, maybe two

>>4364725
>resemle
Poo in the loo

>>4364702
the absolute state of /biz/
everyone that disagrees or is critital is a rajesh or pajeet

go suck the dick of rory maybe he will give you some info soon instead of leaving you all in the dark

>>4364725
So what are you holding? Shill me on your coins. I want to know.

>>4364725
>the delusion you links have reached is insane
quote " the delusion you links have reached is insane" then get the fuck out if you are to dumb to understand it. Go whine somewhere else

>>4364757
The absolute state of /biz/, people asking a question than getting pointed in the direction of where they can find the answer but, refusing to take time to read the information and resorting to crying.

>>4364575
How in any way will it pull a DGB? It is completely different to DGB.

I can't wait until it pulls an ether so you can suck my crypto cock until it hits JUST the right spot.

>>4364197
It’s obvious you failed at trying to understand, sorry brainlet

>>4364757
Its explained in the whitepaper. Discussing a coin with people who can't invest 5-10 minutes to read a whitepaper is a waste of time.

>>4363939
>It will make you enough to get on the next moon mission though and really make it.
you make it sound like it's easy to identify moon missions. and nobody's gonna risk a big amount of money

>>4364725
>>4364589
>>4364197
>>4364757

t. pajeet

>>4364197
>I have tried to read about it
>But not from the Whitepaper, I'm too adhd for that

It's all there.

>>4364534
Was he ok?

>>4363922
this.

it will be long before LINK moons hard enough to make you retire. I hold link btw

>>4363839
This gave me hope and an massive raise in spirits.

>>4365252
like LINK the horse died slowly after being hyped a lot!

Lieutenant Colonel reporting in. Alright you clowns. No lie and no FUD.

I HAVE SERIOUS MONEY ON LINK.

When will we hit:
> $200 per LINK?
> $300 per LINK?

If I hold for 5 years will I see these numbers? And make it holding 50K LINK?!

If you're looking to hold 1m$ worth of link you should buy 2m$ worth of link and hold until next thursday...

>>4366330
WHAT??

>>4364201
/thread

>>4364201
long story short:

WHEN WE MAKE IT FROM LINK YOU CAN TELL EVERYBODY.
YEAH YOU CAN TELL EVERYBODY.
GO AHEAD AND TELL EVERYBODY:
I'M THE MAN I'M THE MAN I'M THE MAN.

>>4366330

This!

>>4366274
$200 in 3 years
$300 in 4 years

>>4367334
And what gives you such hope Marine?

Who knows. Markets are irrational. All I can say with a relatively high degree of certainty is that the price will go up. Anyone who tells you different is talking out of their ass.

>>4367359
Just look at the need for an oracle that can work on the big 3 block chains; BTC, ETH and Hyper Ledger.

The SWIFT leak.

The conferences and how stoic the devs are.

This is going the way of Ethereum. You will retire if you hold until 2021.

>>4367391
Almost like something you can feel in you bones?

>>4363987

Well fine then. I just bought 1ETH worth of LINK just in case!
I dont really want the same thing that happened to me a few years with BTC to happen again!

>>4364589
It's not useless, the entire oracle network operates based on LINK tokens, which equate to trust and security.

Yes, you can launch a node/oracle or whatever without using LINK, but it is untrustworthy. basically no one but scammers will not use LINK.

There's also many ways to come up with a value for a coin, it's function being the biggest revolution in crypto by solving the oracle issue is a start. I suggest reading now about it to understand and realize how massive an impact this will have.

>>4367431
Precisely

Will I make it?

>>4367535
But I'm looking to be a MULTI millionaire after taxes

>>4367535
Gotta Agree - Looking to be a Multi-millionaire.

>>4367622
BONER INTENSIFIES

>>4367359
it's not a matter of "hope"

it's a matter of intelligence and vision. we smart people understand what a network of decentralized oracles means for the future of not only crypto, but the entire fucking human race. this is fucking huge. it is no lie potentially bigger than bitcoin. frankly the majority of this forum is just too unintelligent to get it.

that said, there is risk. the risk is that somebody ELSE makes this system first. but i'm betting on chainlink. they have the biggest head start by far.

>>4364733
Are you fucking stupid? Last update was 5 days ago

https://github.com/smartcontractkit

>>4367622
Yeah I reckon 35K-40K will pay off handsomely in a few years.

If you;ve reached 50K do what you will, dont bother going all in, the oppurtunity cost is high as it has deplorable moonshots. You can make better gains off other coins for the next 4 - 6 months

>>4367391
The man is right

>>4367664
Praying for advice is better than Sorcery anon-chan.

>>4367780
T A L K S C ON F I R M ED

Holy shit, so when the network goes live all those corporations interested in LINK will finally announce their partnership.

>>4367780
>partnerships
Holy shit
He said the magic word
Holy shit

>>4367810
>
If my man, if. Things and life do happen. Not fudding, just be aware.

>>4367810
Yes. It is looking like summer 2018 is when we will be rich. Hopefully the price stays low for a bit so we have longer to accumulate.

>>4367858
>>4367877
I saw this on gitter, it seems they are only reimplementing the network and not creating it from scratch. No wonder Rory said they are pushing for it to go live earlier this 2018.

https://gitter.im/smartcontractkit-chainlink/Lobby

>>4367909
Wow this thread is giving me a huge boner. Let's not repost this stuff, let it die here ssshhhhhhh

>>4367877
is summer 2018 when the network goes live? I'm hoping it can be as soon as spring. Will give /biz/ plenty of time still to accumulate.

>>4367945
Steve also said that once an initial reimplemented piece is out, they will be releasing a roadmap. Anyway just read the picture i posted for more details.

>>4367945
lmao I just took off the rest of my sell orders and bought back in haha. SOld higher than th ebuy in so no biz buy high sell low

Its all coming together Lads!

>>4367978
Seriously, this is HUGE. They are just reimplementing the network and it might go live earlier this 2018. Just like what Rory said they are pushing for.

>>4368296
SSSHHHHHHH!!!

>>4367360
This. LINK is the comfiest hold of all time. You know it will go to fucking pluto, the only question is how soon.

>>4364733
It has been confirmed they are rewriting the core in Go language in private repos.
They will be released to the public later on.

>>4368414
They will also be releasing a development road map as soon as they reimplement an initial piece. That could be as early as EOY 2017. Kek, no news till 2019 my ass. They just didnt think crypto in general would get a hardon for roadmap releases which is pretty pathetic.

>>4368436
Yep things are happening, slowly but surely.
It's just hard to come by this information if you're not in slack all the time.

God I love this experiance.

How is everyone gonna invest, and spend your millions?

>>4363777
If you want to be holding $1 million USD by the end of year next year, then start by buying $3 million USD of LINK today

pic very related

>>4368502
I only have 5k link cause I'm a poor thirdworlder, but if it reaches a decent price I'm gonna cash out 30% to live off of and reinvest, and let the remaining 70% mature and maybe grow in price a bit more.
My ultimate goal in life is to just sit at home playing WoW while my money works for me.

>>4368522
hurr durr good one bro.

>>4368522
Literally shitting on LINK for tanking during the fork mess when almost every altcoin tanked. You'll seriously neck yourself in a year buddy.

cant hold link because its not on bittrex

>>4368502
freedom or not at all - unless the cash out lets me dump it into normie investments that generate enough cash flow to live comfortably off of indefinitely, I won't do it

>>4368525

You're going to make a lot of rupees, Sanjay, don't worry.

>>4368546
>be the great cubic hope of /biz/
>only once EVER even x2
Gonna need a nuke to get that fucker to ever lift more than an ass penny

To make it with link you need to create an ICO and sell a bunch of idiots 32mil worth.

Quick, post toilet meymeys >>4367909 >>4367780 are posting information which might drive the price up
REEEE

>>4368672
Oy Vey!

>>4368786
>>4368672
OK just bought up additional 9500, got 50k LINK now strap me in

>mfw high and drunk af
>hope i wont regret it tomorrow

>>4368561
Just open a binance account and stop being a faggot.

>>4368672
>>4368786
Kek, the linkies that sold their stack waiting to buy back in late 2018 are going to be curbstompped without this information.

>>4368546
And most alts have recovered and even pumped higher than they were before the fork drama
Link still UNDER TWENTY CENTS

>>4363777

The ultimate guide is here!

>>4368672
That "information" is literally worthless
stop trying to dump your bags

>>4368866
Yeah whatever buddy, keep using your charts for a coin thats only been tradeable for 1.5 months. Faggots like you probably bought moon missions like Antshares at 11 and sold at 3 during the July dip. Just dont buy then.

>>4368907
Is that the only response you can muster up bro? "huur ur shit fagget shut up nao"?
Top kek.

You're losing money by holding link. Deal with it you delusional fuck.

>>4368882
>Information that they are only reimplementing the product and not building from scratch
>Information that they are pushing to go live early 2018
>Information that they are releasing a development roadmap as soon as an initial piece is reimplemented

You fuckers have such a hard-on for other crypto releasing development roadmap updates but not LINK kek. You're just pissed because it destroys the FUD that LINK wont be operational until 2 years and that it wont have any news till then at all.

Strap in faggot. Initial piece means the development roadmap could be released as early as Q4 2017.

>>4368879
Proud cuck here,

>>4368879

>tfw toilet

Almost a cocksucker tho!

>>4369085

Also seeing there's apparently smart people in this thread... pls tell me if I will ever make it. This is what I got:

6k REQ
57 WTC
1350 LINK
60 ARK

933€ / 0.1624 BTC

p-pls respond, I need advise.

>>4369173
switch all that WTC to Link and you have a solid portfolio.

>>4369327

Don't you think WTC will go a little higher before LINK starts its moon mission. which should happen next year?

Big news are coming before EOY for WTC right? or so I read...

I did a crapload of reading last night and I just wanted you to all know this is a sure fire moon mission if it gets implemented.

However there is fuck all about how well the project is actually going. From memory SWIFT has been doing testing in their own network with it but no information on how its going. It is a pretty goddam speculative bet but it is a good one

>>4369400
Swift if setting up a fraud detection service Summer 2018. The original release date for the network was Q2 2018.

One of the touted uses of Chainlink was fraud detection.

>>4369487
Noice. Yeah I read about swift and my god companies dont get much bigger than them.

Loads of news about implementing new technology solutions for security and finacial services very impressive stuff

>>4369487
Holy shit is that why rory said they are pushing for the network to go live earlier this 2018?

>>4369400
>>4369510
>>4369487
>>4369529
>mfw still waiting for my FIAT deposit on bitstamp

>>4369546
Trust me you are safe for weeks. I'm pretty confident it won't go anywhere until December at the earliest. Plenty of time to accumulate more.

Also

>mfw link will moon and then property market will be in downturn

Should I dump my 7k Link to buy POWR and later buy more Link?

If ChainLink is blockchain middleware/oracle, what exactly is the point of the ChainLink token?

>>4369605
Pay the node operators that run the network. They won't do it for free lol

>>4369359
>before LINK starts its moon mission. which should happen next year?
nobody knows when LINK will start its moon mission

Link pump n dump is over, only dumb money buying now

>>4369694
thx for the opinion, street shitter

>>4368561
If you unironically use bittrex you are a hyper faggot

Binance + poloniex gives you a much more vast and superior reach on altcoins

>LINK
Who's behind this thread?

>>4369836
Dont I need to give up a ton of information for poloniex? I believe all I have on bittrex is my home address

>>4369979
Lmao what? You dont need to give any info on any exchange as far as i remember

Link is old news won't moon until late 2018... BUY $REQ

>>4369648
>tfw you could just pay node operators in BTC or ETH because LINK has no intrinsic purpose to run the network

who the hell is even selling link. Like i just dont get it. Between all of us at biz do we not own at least 10-20 million of these shit. I have 45k myself

>>4369587
yes buy high sell low

>>4363887
same

>>4369529
I believe we will [find out]

>>4369173
WTC is a chinkfag scam coin

>>4371039
>you have to give your balls to GDAX/Coinbase to deposit from bank

>>4366274
greetings, friend, we will make it, don't worry