/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4111700
https://www.bitcoinsuperconference.com/speaker/sergey-nazarov

>his business name is literally 'smartcontract.com'
what a joke.

>>4111734
Sergey's smartcuntract.com is the pets.com of crypto screencap this...some faggot who isn't even north of 30 yrs old yet is starting his own solution to a blockchain problem. come on. bollocks.

Fuck Sergey he lost me so much money...

>>4111758
>some faggot who isn't even north of 30 yrs old yet

Linux was in his 20s when he created Linux. Vitalik barely needs to shave. Stop being jealous because people younger than you are achieving more success and contributing more to society than you ever have/will.

isnt the term 'smart contract' an ETH thing....

>>4111775
no, you lost yourself so much money

Why does he use that stupid fucking headshot he looks like a supreme autist

>>4111775
LINK is 60 days on the market and you guys act like the project is dead and the token is worthless. What are you thinking? Give it time faggot,I'm sure your bags will get lighter

>>4111924
we can't all afford fashion consultants, you bug chasing faggot. at least you'll die young from aids though. the Lord will spare you the sight of his photo soon enough. amen.

>>4112002
>$32000000million USD Dollars
>can’t afford fashion advice

sergey is a bitch, join this https://discord.gg/tUZVSCv PnD group

>>4112012
get a load of this peasant. she has no idea how much a fashion consultant costs. point at her and laugh/

>>4111989
>just wait until 2027, when there is a possibility that this gets mass adopted, meanwhile miss out on thousands of other moon missions

might as well just hold bitcoin.

>>4111910
no

>>4111700
Which conference? Toilet fest 2018?

Just kidding this coin is going to the moon

>>4111897
Vitalik doesn't need to shave because he's a low test soyboy with narrow shoulders and wide hips

>>4111700
Rory's a fat faggot tbqh they should get someone who actually contributes something to the community to replace him

Sergey has been talking at conferences for years, same thing with that exchange thing he was working on. Lots of talk, big names involved, nothing happened. For example I found this:
AirConf is an entirely online tech conference, hosted via Google Hangouts.
Speaker: Sergey Nazarov
Title: Using the Blockchain
The Bitcoin blockchain is an amazing tools for trustless payments; the next step in the evolution of the decentralized database technology known as the the Blockchain is using it for other types of data, in an equally trustless/cryptographically secure way. Decentralized Exchange for Asset Ownership and Smart Contracts for self-verifying and self-executing legal agreements are the next steps in this evolution. This discussion will focus on Blockchain 2.0 technologies and how they are being used to make trustless/trustworthy web applications.

>no fashion advice
>not >30yo

This arguments are the reason why you are fucking poor wagecucks, desperately hoping to make some bucks out of the success of some other brilliant mind. Because you are morons.

this is already priced in

>>4113001
>Lots of talk, big names involved, nothing happened
>knows people in the industry
>had one of the most popular ICOs in recent times
>is probably going to turn 32mil of investors money into billions
>nothing happened

Pic from Sergeys conference room

>>4113127
Yes I'm talking about hes previous project. And how it resembles what is happening with chainlink. It all seems perfect, but doesn't live up to the expectations. Sergey's genius, but you need more than ideas

>>4113127
ICO was nowhere nearly as popular as other ICOs that were going on at the time.
You only think it was popular because of constant shilling on this board.

>>4111700

>>4111734
What?
Having that domain name is pure gold, what the fuck are you talking about?

>>4113300
Yes it's pure gold but MAYBE he should use the product's name, you know ChainLink?

>>4113001
>Lots of talk, big names involved, nothing happened.
Except for SIBOS, right?
Where Sergey was the only outside crypto dev to do a showcase for SWIFT?
With the involvement of companies like Sony, BNP Paribas, AXA, Barclays, ...?

You are deluded if you can't tell what the fuck is going on right now.

>>4113319
He's not wrong, literally nothing came out of it except some shitty "announcement" that they're in talks but they've been in talks for more than a year.
Maybe updates us if this is actually happening or not?

>>4113318
The product is smart contracts. Always was.
Chainlink is one of the tools used by smartcontract.com to create that product.

Don't be dumb.

>>4113334
>literally nothing came out of it
So you are aware of a project in the development phase, and you're complaining that it isn't ready yet.

Good job on having literal shit for brains.

>>4113337
What? No, the product is middleware for smart contracts.

>>4113353
They've been working on it for 3 years and now it turns out it's on the level od development that even Confido couldn't use it for their alpha.
Everyone thought the product is pretty much finished after all these years but its not even good for an alpha.

>>4113334
>Before conference
They aren't in talks with Swift they won a science fair
>After Conference
We knew they were in talks with Swift about implementing Chainlink. But it doesn't matter until they officially announce it.

Where will the goalposts move next I wonder.

>>4113377
>What? No, the product is middleware for smart contracts.
The end product is smart contracts.
The middleware serves to create those smart contracts.

>They've been working on it for 3 years and now it turns out it's on the level od development that even Confido couldn't use it for their alpha.
Confido was never going to use it for their alpha.
They only decided to go with Chainlink a few weeks ago.

>Everyone thought the product is pretty much finished after all these years but its not even good for an alpha.
Chainlink v1.0 was finished in June of this year, and they started rolling it out a few days after SIBOS.

They're right on schedule.
You are retarded.

>>4113383
>SWIFT officially implements Chainlink
>"But SWIFT didn't change its own name to Chainlink, dead coin!"

>>4112106
Hurr my timeline exaggeration FUD

>>4113319
I'm talking about his previous projects NXT, cryptamail and the there's another one, can't remember the name. He was talking about them at a lot of conferences and putting the products in the faces of huge players. And they were brilliant projects with very clever products, but that's it to this day, nothing happened really. Like I said earlier, I think the guy's a genius, but I'm really starting to doubt if he is capable of DELIVERING.

>>4113383
>/biz/ is one person

>>4113391
Rolling it out where?
Where is the announcement?

And what schedule? There is no schedule, no roadmap, no updates.

>>4113438
>Rolling it out where?
On the front page of their website.
Literally the first thing you see is the button "ChainLink a Smart Contract" with some explanation.

>Where is the announcement?
Lmao.

>And what schedule? There is no schedule, no roadmap, no updates.
Read the whitepaper.

>>4113436
None of those projects had the exposure Chainlink has.

- General of Faggots: General Sergey Nazarov
- Faggot: 500001+ LINK
- Lieutenant Faggot: 250001-500000 LINK
- Major Faggot: 175001-250000 LINK
- Brigadier Faggot: 125001-175000 LINK
- Cuck: 750001-125000 LINK
- Lieutenant Cuck: 50001-75000 LINK
- Deluded: 35001-50000 LINK
- Normie: 25001-35000 LINK
- First Stall: 20001-25000 LINK
- Second Stall: 15001-20000 LINK
X<><><>X<><><>X
- Sergeant Shitter: 10001-15000 LINK
- Master Shitter: 9001-10000 LINK
- Shitter First Class: 7501-9000 LINK
- Staff Shitter: 5001-7500 LINK
- Shitter: 3501-5000 LINK
- Cocksucker: 1501-3500 LINK
- Toilet: 501-1500 LINK
- Charmin: 1-500 LINK
- Smart Money: 0 LINK

he's doing all these conferences because there aren't any actual partnerships with LINK yet, besides SWIFT using it as a proof of concept.

this is the type of marketing that they are doing. conferences every month

>>4113750
>Literally the first thing you see is the button "ChainLink a Smart Contract" with some explanation.
That was there from the start.

>Read the whitepaper.
Please point me to the paragraph in the whitepaper where any kind of schedule or roadmap is discussed.

>>4111700
Priced in

>>4114360
>That was there from the start.
The button used to be "connect smart contract", and it's only since a few days after SIBOS that you can set up ETH, BTC, or Hyperledger nodes.

>Please point me to the paragraph in the whitepaper where any kind of schedule or roadmap is discussed.
Lmao, pic related.
Try actually reading it next time, smart ass.

And this is all technical fine-tuning details; since the major stuff (Chainlink network v1.0) is being rolled out as we speak.
So if you had even the most basic understanding of the subject, you'd know asking for a "roadmap" is a pretty silly question.

>>4111700
That's already priced in m8.

Well, well, well. The plot sure thickens now, my friends, but be honest with yourselves; what else did you think would be the inevitable outcome? Sergey Nazarov, the Savior of Crypto, Hero of the NEETs. Say it out loud, repeat it to yourself, and be honest; it sure sounds silly, doesn’t it? But you knew that. You knew it on September 19th, 2017, and the thought never left your mind, instead you just buried it. Buried it deep inside, where it wouldn’t bother you anymore, the nagging insecurity and the absolute incredulity of the whole thing. You knew this house of cards was bound to collapse, you just didn’t know when, or how bad it would actually get. Now here we are, 1 month and a half later with a coin in absolute shambles. A coin that, you wouldn’t be too far off in deeming the “Digibyte 2.0,” seeing as how it has been more or less confirmed that that’s how we got to this place to begin with. It was a fun ride, an emotional ride, but the time has come. As the crash begins, don’t be hard on yourselves; the Pajeet shilling was palpable to say the least, and for low IQ traders such as yourselves it’s easy to see how you could have fallen for such an obvious ruse. I digress, however. It’s time to let the big boys take charge, it’s time to truly make altcoins great again, by dumping the one coin in the way.

>>4112106

>might as well just hold bitcoin

yes you dumb fucking piece of shit you are suppose to hold chainlink like bitcoin.

>>4114507
t. nolinker

>>4111910
No, the idea is older than Bitcoin.

Regarding the github, those who doubt shall not be rewarded

>>4114507
TOPKEK PASTA FROM POL LMFAO

>>4115567
What does Rory mean by this? Does this mean he’s really a faggot

>rory is not human

>>4115888
>my trips confirm rory's inhumanity